At 12:04 PM 5/9/2008, Karen Coyle wrote:

For example, there is no reason for anyone to have to
key a publisher name for a modern book with an ISBN -- the identity of
the publisher is inherent in the ISBN and that information could be
system supplied (using a barcode scanner). But this would mean giving up
the idea that the publisher name must be transcribed from the piece. It
is that rule that is forcing us to continue to key the publisher name
rather than get that information from a readily available source.

Oh, my goodness.  This is absolutely the wrong direction to be
headed.  This would result in exactly the kind of thing that WorldCat Local
has done with the statement of responsibility, where they use
authority-controlled data to supply a made-up (and often erroneous) "by"
statement.  In order to properly identify a given manifestation, the
publisher name MUST be taken from the item in hand, otherwise the
description might end up automatically changing over time as the publisher
record changes (name change, acquired by another publisher, etc.).

Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Bibliographic Services Dept.
Northwestern University Library
1970 Campus Drive
Evanston, IL  60208-2300
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (847) 491-2939
fax:   (847) 491-4345

Reply via email to