I agree with Marc Stern From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene Sorry to sound like a
broken record, but I wonder how this would have played out in other
contexts. For instance, the abolitionist movement, the civil rights
movement, and various anti-war and other movements have involved political-religious
alliances on controversial public policy questions. (The abolitionist
movement was of course indeed dangerous to the republic in the short term,
though good in the long term.) I assume that many good, smart politicians
would have seen the potential to build and strengthen such alliances, and I'd
guess that they indeed did so. If in 1963, a government official called
on Christian ministers to oppose racism and segretation and support civil
rights, and asked them to assert that good Christians should oppose racism and
segregation and support civil rights, would this really have been
unconstitutional? If the official sought to strengthen the existing
political-religious alliance between civil rights forces in politics and in
churches, by bringing in some other religious groups, would that have been
impermissible? It seems to me the answer must clearly be
no: Religious groups and leaders are important sources of moral
authority. To change people's actions and votes, one needs to appeal to
their moral sense. If one wants the civil rights movement, the
anti-abortion movement, the gay rights movement, or whatever other movement to
succeed, one needs to build alliances with people who can speak the moral
language of deeply religious people, and who can speak with moral authority to
those people. Incidentally, here are a few concrete
examples of other appeals to religious groups to join a political and moral
fight: Nat’l Journal, Dec. 2, 1993: Speaking to black church leaders involved in a growing movement to
address the disproportionate impacts of pollution on low-income minority
communities, Vice President Gore today called on church leaders to join with
the administration in "healing our land." Following passionate
appeals by leaders to Gore to take steps to confront the issue, Gore joined in
condemning "the injustice of dumping on those who are powerless." . .
. . President Clinton offered yesterday to forgive all the debt of poor
countries that work to end hunger and poverty in the next millennium, and
challenged Congress to approve $1 billion to finance the debt relief. . . . At a prayer breakfast this week, Mr. Clinton called on religious
leaders to put the heat on Congress to approve the funding. . . . The
|
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw