RE: Zionist-Occupied Government

[Larry Darby]

“Neoconservative” is another code word for the Zionists (some Jews, some Jewish-Christians) who dominate the US Government. They’re Israel-firsters. The dominant philosophy is Trotskyism.  Dominionists is another term that covers those who put Israel first, as opposed to the US of A.  A sure sign of an Israel-first is the use of hate-based words such as “anti-semite” or “anti-Jew” or “anti-Israel” – those are all terms of semantic terrorism used to silence criticism of Judaism, its adherents or World Jewry, and US foreign policy when the someone broaches the notion that Israel is a terrorist state.   In short, talk of “freedom” and “democracy” is not much different from the “Jewish communism” of Karl Marx, Trotsky, Lenin, etc., all of who were Jewish.  “Godless Communism” was always a misnomer.   To understand the fallacy of calling someone anti-semitic, it’s helpful to understand that “semitic” refers to a group of African-Asian languages, not Jews or any religion. Arabic, Ethiopic, Hebrew are just 3 of several semitic languages.  Semantic terrorists who throw out the hate-based word “anti-semitic” are simply engaging in an offensive maneuver to stifle discussion.   These are good sites to explore:   http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/   http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm (When Victims Rule)   http://judicial-inc.biz/False_Flags_summary.htm   http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm   I suspect most people who are anti-Gentiles can explore the sites without dislodging any bigotry.                   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Dane Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:05 PM To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Zionist-Occupied Government           The problem, though, is that the term "Zionist-occupied government" does not just evoke a factual claim, true or untrue.  Nor is it just an "accusation."  Rather, it is a specific anti-Semitic code phrase, which originated with certain specific, radical, anti-Semitic groups, and has, for them and others, a specific anti-Semitic meaning.   I can easily see an argument for allowing all forms of language into a forum like this, including "kike."  But, if lines are going to be drawn, then ZOG seems to me to be on the same side of the line as "kike."         There is, of course, a larger conversation brewing here about the relationship between literal meaning and contextual understanding.    But I'll let others pick up that baton if they like.                                    Perry P.S.    After I pushed the "send" button, my Eudora e-mail program just warned me that the term "Zionist-occupied government" might be considred offensive, and that I should reconsider using it in my e-mail.  Aha. Mark Graber wrote: The issue is strictly what may be said, not the truth value of assertions and, for better or worse, while I think "kike" clearly crosses the line, my line is not crossed by calling the U.S. Government "Zionist dominated," however mistaken I think that may be, and however ghastly the history of that accusation has been. ******************************************************* Perry Dane                                 Professor of Law Rutgers University School of Law  -- Camden                  217 North Fifth Street Camden, NJ 08102                           [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.camlaw.rutgers.edu/bio/925/ Work:   (856) 225-6004 Fax:       (856) 969-7924 Home:   (610) 896-5702 *******************************************************

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.