On Tuesday, October 04, 2011, Yves Guillemot wrote: > Le mardi 4 octobre 2011 à 22:39:22, Yves Guillemot a écrit : > >I added two new export options (in addition of the current export mode) : > >one with repeat and one with an expansion of the repeats.
Cool! I'll check it out as soon as I get a chance. > I forgot to say that these new export options only make sens if the repeats > exist at the same place on all the printed tracks. I wonder if LilyPond can handle repeats that don't line up, or if this ever really occurs in the literature. I told Niek his MusicXML export should just abort if it encountered a repeat scenario it couldn't handle, and that has me wondering if LilyPond export might not want to do the same thing. There could be some shared code in here somewhere to look at the structure of the composition and ensure the repeats are sane, and both exporters could make use of it. The thing I don't like about that idea is it almost suggests that we want to make repeating be some kind of global thing, like tempo, and that's just a bigger can of worms than I want to open today. It's easier to let it all go, and just more or less ignore the issue. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
