On Monday, October 17, 2011, Yves Guillemot wrote:

> It took me some time but it should work better now.

It does!  I'll have to experiment with this when I get more time, and try an 
example from the real world.

> Conservatively I keep the "old mode" option. But probably it would be
> better to remove it.

How about we remove it as an available option, but leave the code in place in 
case there is some need to bring it back?
 
> I hope I don't break any working feature of the exporter: I don't test very
> intensively.

That's the way we do things around here.  Solve for the test case at hand, get 
it working, and chase down unintended side effects for five years!

What, this is bad?  Why?  :)

> I presume some problems may appear if a time signature change occurs inside
> a repeating segment.

I expect everything would blow up and go completely to hell.  So let's not 
test that case.  :)
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to