Le dimanche 2 octobre 2011 à 18:05:27, D. Michael McIntyre a écrit : >In the old days (I'm 95% sure, but didn't compile an old version of >Rosegarden to confirm), LilyPond export would have expanded that repeated >segment and written all of this out to bar 18, in addition to having the >same sort of \skip problem I had to correct manually in this example. This >"compression" is something new. You could theoretically have a composition >that sounded all the repeats, and yet printed out with correct bar numbers >and no redundant notes put on paper.
What's fun is that I did not only absolutely nothing to get that result but that all my work was precisely focused on getting the opposite effect on RG notation. RG11.02, which come with my current distro, give the same lilypond export (cf. attachement). > >I hope this explanation and these examples make it more clear what I'm >talking about. > Thanks Michael, it's clearer now and I understand where the remaining problem is. I shall try to look at it more deeply in the next days. Yves
anacrusis-reference-2-RG1102.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
