RE: [CentOS-es] Problemas con el bind
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 10:09:20 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con el bind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /var/named/chroot/var/named total 68 -rw-r- 1 root root 1920 may 10 15:14 14.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone -rw-r- 1 root root 561 may 10 15:24 3.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone -rw-r- 1 root root 461 may 10 15:23 94.110.200.in-addr.arpa.zone drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 may 10 11:22 data -rw-r- 1 root root 639 may 10 15:06 escopusa.com.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 198 nov 10 10:22 localdomain.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 195 nov 10 10:22 localhost.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 427 nov 10 10:22 named.broadcast -rw-r- 1 root named 2871 may 10 12:42 named.ca -rw-r- 1 root named 2873 may 10 12:43 named.cache -rw-r- 1 root named 424 nov 10 10:22 named.ip6.local -rw-r- 1 root named 457 may 10 12:56 named.local -rw-r- 1 root named 2878 may 10 11:12 named.root -rw-r- 1 root named 427 nov 10 10:22 named.zero -rw-r- 1 root root 2119 may 10 15:25 red-gye.zone -rw-r- 1 root root 868 may 10 15:26 red-pvj.zone drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 jul 27 2004 slaves Los archivos de zonas tienen que pertenecer a named, tendrias que cambiarle de dueño con chown. Ya lo hice, pero me sale el mismo mensaje que no existen los archivos -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /var/named/chroot/var/named total 68 -rw-r- 1 root named 1920 may 10 15:14 14.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 561 may 10 15:24 3.168.192.in-addr.arpa.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 461 may 10 15:23 94.110.200.in-addr.arpa.zone drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 may 10 11:22 data -rw-r- 1 root named 639 may 10 15:06 escopusa.com.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 198 nov 10 2007 localdomain.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 195 nov 10 2007 localhost.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 427 nov 10 2007 named.broadcast -rw-r- 1 root named 2871 may 10 12:42 named.ca -rw-r- 1 root named 2873 may 10 12:43 named.cache -rw-r- 1 root named 424 nov 10 2007 named.ip6.local -rw-r- 1 root named 457 may 10 12:56 named.local -rw-r- 1 root named 2878 may 10 11:12 named.root -rw-r- 1 root named 427 nov 10 2007 named.zero -rw-r- 1 root named 2119 may 10 15:25 red-gye.zone -rw-r- 1 root named 868 may 10 15:26 red-pvj.zone drwxrwx--- 2 named named 4096 jul 27 2004 slaves -- El contendo del directorio donde esta el archivo named.conf es: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /var/named/chroot/etc total 20 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 abr 16 10:41 localtime -rw-r- 1 root named 1100 nov 10 2007 named.caching-nameserver.conf -rw-r- 1 root root 2752 may 10 12:49 named.conf -rw-r- 1 root named 955 nov 10 2007 named.rfc1912.zones -rw-r--r-- 1 root named 188 may 10 13:11 rndc.key _ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Re: Sitio Web con Php, Apache y MySQL
El Lunes, 12 de Mayo de 2008 10:43, ciracusa escribió: Lista, buenos días. Estoy haciendo algunas pruebas con LAMP sobre Debian Lenny. La pregunta es: Que debería hacer para tener los sources de php alojados en el server Linux (con Apache) y poder conectarme desde algún IDE de desarrollo desde clientes Windows? Muchas Gracias. Saludos. Hola, buenos días, generalmente se instala servicios como FTP o samba, sin embargo, me gusta la idea de usar sistemas de control de versiones como Subversion[1] que tienen clientes tanto para linux[2] como para windows[3]. [1] http://subversion.tigris.org/ [2] http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=26589 http://gnomefiles.org/app.php?soft_id=1059 [3] http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas
Bien claro dice : e2fsck /dev/sdb1 -y Pero si aun el disco carga , te sugiero backup la informacion , existe la posibilidad de riesgo de perdida de informacion slds On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:01:47 -0500, Alexander López Lapo wrote Hola a todos. Tengo un problema con un servidor de correo que esta en producción. Se fue la luz y cuando la reinicio para que empieze a trabajar me sale el siguiente error: EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem check. EXT3- fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended EXT3 FS on sdb2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Ya le he pasado el fsck -y -c -f /dev/sda[1|2]. No se me ocurre nada más. Será que alguien me puede ayudar con alguna sugerencia. Como les cometo, este servidor estaba en producción. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Gino Alania Hurtado Nitcom Labs (http://www.nitcom.com) ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Problemas con bind
Hola amigos de la lista Quiero en pasos escalonados migrar todos mis servicios de window$ para linux. He instalado bind en un centos 5.1 y declarado una zona esclava a la cual se transfiere desde un dns en window$ 2003. He revisado la zona en /var.../slaves/dominio.db y tiene todos los records del dominio master; ademas he revisado los logs y arranca bien. En named.conf tengo un acl para mi segmento de red así como abierto el puerto 53 en iptables. Pero si hago consultas con nslookup (desde window$) no obtengo respuesta y no veo ningun message de error. Mis preguntas son dos: 1. ¿ alguna consideración adicional para consultas desde window$ ? 2.- ¿ algun otro sitio adonde vayan los logs de named o forma de configurarlo? Gracias -- Lic. Abelardo Ramírez Ferrer Especialista en Ciencias de la Computación Representaciones PLATINO S.A. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas
Una pregunta no será lo mismo e2fsck con fsck. Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado wrote: Bien claro dice : e2fsck /dev/sdb1 -y Pero si aun el disco carga , te sugiero backup la informacion , existe la posibilidad de riesgo de perdida de informacion slds On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:01:47 -0500, Alexander López Lapo wrote Hola a todos. Tengo un problema con un servidor de correo que esta en producción. Se fue la luz y cuando la reinicio para que empieze a trabajar me sale el siguiente error: EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous mount: IO failure EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1): ext3_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem check. EXT3- fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended EXT3 FS on sdb2, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Ya le he pasado el fsck -y -c -f /dev/sda[1|2]. No se me ocurre nada más. Será que alguien me puede ayudar con alguna sugerencia. Como les cometo, este servidor estaba en producción. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Gino Alania Hurtado Nitcom Labs (http://www.nitcom.com) ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas
El lun, 12-05-2008 a las 19:28 -0500, Alexander López Lapo escribió:
Una pregunta no será lo mismo e2fsck con fsck.
Hola
Si lees la página del manual fsck(8) con calma, encontrarás todas las
respuestas a tus preguntas: man fsck
Resúmen:
fsck es un front-end para varios de los fsck.tipo. Donde tipo se
refiere al tipo de sistema de archivos: ext2, ext3, reiserfs, etc.
Normalmente fsck trata de determinar que es tipo mirando
en /etc/fstab. De modo predeterminado cuando no se indica y no halla
en /etc/fstab el tipo es de modo predeterminado ext2.
Por experiencia lo mejor es siempre indicar el tipo de sistema de
archivos, por ejemplo:
fsck -t ext3 /dev/sdb1
Es equivalente a escribir:
fsck.ext3 /dev/sdb1
Que es equivalente a:
e2fsck /dev/sdb1
Entonces fsck.ext3/ext2 y e2fsck son el mismo programa.
Mira esto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which fsck fsck.ext2 fsck.ext3
/sbin/fsck
/sbin/fsck.ext2
/sbin/fsck.ext3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -li /sbin/fsck /sbin/fsck.ext2 /sbin/fsck.ext3
40962 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23576 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/fsck
40836 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 148296 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/fsck.ext2
40836 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 148296 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/fsck.ext3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ find /sbin/ -inum 40836 -exec ls -li {} \;
40836 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 148296 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/e2fsck
40836 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 148296 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/fsck.ext2
40836 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 148296 2007-12-07 14:51 /sbin/fsck.ext3
Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado wrote:
Bien claro dice :
e2fsck /dev/sdb1 -y
Pero si aun el disco carga , te sugiero backup la informacion , existe la
posibilidad de riesgo de perdida de informacion
slds
On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:01:47 -0500, Alexander López Lapo wrote
Hola a todos.
Tengo un problema con un servidor de correo que esta en producción.
Se fue la luz y cuando la reinicio para que empieze a trabajar me
sale el siguiente error: EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1):
ext3_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from previous
mount: IO failure EXT3-fs warning (device sdb1):
ext3_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem check. EXT3-
fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended
EXT3 FS on sdb1, internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with
ordered data mode. kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended
EXT3 FS on sdb2, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Ya le he pasado el fsck -y -c -f /dev/sda[1|2]. No se me ocurre nada
más. Será que alguien me puede ayudar con alguna sugerencia. Como
les cometo, este servidor estaba en producción.
Parece que te equivocaste, dice sdb1 = /dev/sdb1, y
*no*es* /dev/sda[12]
--
Hardy Beltran Monasterios
Consultor e Instructor GNU/Linux
LPI Certified (LPIC-1) / RedHat Certified (RHCE)
http://www.hardy.com.bo
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
Jason Pyeron wrote: I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled. Is there a cmd line swith or env var? Why not sign packages you roll? It really isn't that hard. RPM does have issues with large keys, though - Key on the top1000 list aren't usable :) - I think 64kb is the maximum size. And: Setting gpgcheck to 0 in yum.conf should disable global gpg checking, you can turn it on for each repository in the .repo files under /etc/yum.repos.d/. So the choice of how you shoot yourself in the foot with unsigned packages is up to you :) Cheers, Ralph pgphzGqu2QF8l.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys Jason Pyeron wrote: I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled. Is there a cmd line swith or env var? Why not sign packages you roll? It really isn't that hard. RPM does have It's a throw away project on a throwaway vm instance. issues with large keys, though - Key on the top1000 list aren't usable :) - I think 64kb is the maximum size. And: Setting gpgcheck to 0 in yum.conf should disable global gpg checking, you can turn it on for each repository in the .repo files under /etc/yum.repos.d/. So the choice of how you shoot yourself in the foot with unsigned packages is up to you :) But there are no (temporary) options from the command line? Cheers, Ralph -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, purge the message from your system and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote: snip hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical frontend for LVM in your desktop). From your grub.conf we know that it thinks it's installed on (hd0,2), but hd0,2 is hda3 (if I understa nd that correctly) and that is LVM, and grub can't boot from LVM because grub boots the kernel and only that knows about LVM. So, you are probably booting from hda8, but it's not in your fstab as the /boot partition. What does a df say? Does it list hda8 among the partitions? Probably not? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 10696956 4597688 5547128 46% / /dev/hda3 102486 22174 75020 23% /boot tmpfs 257260 0257260 0% /dev/shm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff as your /boot partition? If not mounted, do: mkdir /mnt/hda8 mount /dev/hda8 /mnt/hda8 cat /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf Does this look like the grub.conf that is the *real* one booting your system? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir /mnt/hda8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount /dev/hda8 /mnt/hda8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf cat: /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Kai: Before I got the above data this morning, I let PUP download/install the latest kernel (2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.i686) but after rebooting, it comes up with the original kernel that is on the CentOS 5 Install DVD I used last November. Not surprising that it does not boot this newest kernel. The download/install seemed to go perfectly, so the Subject changed from yum not updating the kernel to where is the proper boot file When it boots Linux, CentOS gives a message something like booting root (hd 0, 7). TIA, Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote: snip hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical frontend for LVM in your desktop). From your grub.conf we know that it thinks it's installed on (hd0,2), but hd0,2 is hda3 (if I understand that correctly) and that is LVM, and grub can't boot from LVM because grub boots the kernel and only that knows about LVM. So, you are probably booting from hda8, but it's not in your fstab as the /boot partition. What does a df say? Does it list hda8 among the partitions? Probably not? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 10696956 4597688 5547128 46% / /dev/hda3 102486 22174 75020 23% /boot tmpfs 257260 0257260 0% /dev/shm [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff as your /boot partition? If not mounted, do: mkdir /mnt/hda8 mount /dev/hda8 /mnt/hda8 cat /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf Does this look like the grub.conf that is the *real* one booting your system? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir /mnt/hda8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount /dev/hda8 /mnt/hda8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf cat: /mnt/hda8/boot/grub/grub.conf: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# The proper location of the grub.conf is: /mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf 'boot' was the name of the mount point which isn't part of the 'boot' file system. Kai: Before I got the above data this morning, I let PUP download/install the latest kernel (2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.i686) but after rebooting, it comes up with the original kernel that is on the CentOS 5 Install DVD I used last November. Not surprising that it does not boot this newest kernel. The download/install seemed to go perfectly, so the Subject changed from yum not updating the kernel to where is the proper boot file When it boots Linux, CentOS gives a message something like booting root (hd 0, 7). TIA, Lanny Kai, is right though, chances are grub from the MBR is looking into a different partition for it's config and shows one of the problems with grub. I think there is a version of grub that will keep it's configs in the remaining sectors (sectors 2-62) of the first track and boot the kernels directly from another partition, but that's non-standard. You could use a single 'boot' partition for all your Linux distros though, but make it bigger, say 256MB (or 512MB if you have a lot of distros installed). I would typically have /dev/hda1 setup as a 256MB 'boot' and reuse it for other distros, just make sure not to format it on install or you'll bork the first distro's kernels! -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gnome-terminal's backslashes look like Ws with a horizontal line through -- how to get a backslash?
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:16:23PM -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: Hello! I've just started trying gnome-terminal (instead of xterm) because of its tabbing facility. However, I note that with it backslashes appear something like a W with a horizontal line through it. Any known way to get a backslash to appear as a backslash? To see what I mean, use gnome-terminal with echo '\' in bash, ksh, etc. Regards, Chip Campbell I have no idea how to cure it, but it sounds like you may be set for a Korean local,... a w with a horizontal line through it is a Won symbol (Korean money). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - pgpFF429jpf1z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box
[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500: Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff as your /boot partition? And this question? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box
[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:52:16 -0400: The proper location of the grub.conf is: /mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf right, if that is the boot partition, there won't be a boot directory. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update did not update kernel on one box
[EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 10696956 4597688 5547128 46% / /dev/hda3 102486 22174 75020 23% /boot I don't understand how this can go together with this partition table: /dev/hda35348 1058639606840 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda837343747 105808+ 83 Linux /dev/hda93748534712095968+ 8e Linux LVM Your /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 might be on /dev/hda9 and the correct boot partition for it is probably /dev/hda8. Then you have /dev/hda3 which is another LVM partition, but which is not used by your installation at all (at least the small size of VolGroup00- LogVol00 suggests this). And at the same time your installation has mounted /dev/hda3 as a normal partition (although it is LVM) and uses it to install the kernel updates and thinks it's the boot partition. However, the /dev/hda3 that your system uses is about 100 MB while the /dev/hda3 of the partition table is roughly half the size of your whole disk and LVM managed. This all doesn't fit together. Ross thinks you have more than one distribution on that disk. That could indeed be an explanation. Did you do a repair or so? The twofold installation of Windows somehow hosed the booting and you tried to repair the system and somehow the boot partitions got mixed up or so? Do an lvdisplay and post some lines from it here, the LV Name and LV Size lines should be sufficient. And the output of pvdisplay. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 WXP
I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and had some strange results. During the install, I changed the default OS to boot to Window$ (because I rarely use this machine, but others who don't have a clue use Wxx), but then while the packages were downloading, I left the machine alone. When I came back, it had rebooted to the DVD, so I pulled it out and rebooted again. It came up in the Windows boot selection screen (W98 or WXP), and never stopped at grub. Should I not have set it to go to Windows by default, or is this something different? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 WXP
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and had some strange results. During the install, I changed the default OS to boot to Window$ (because I rarely use this machine, but others who don't have a clue use Wxx), but then while the packages were downloading, I left the machine alone. When I came back, it had rebooted to the DVD, so I pulled it out and rebooted again. It came up in the Windows boot selection screen (W98 or WXP), and never stopped at grub. Should I not have set it to go to Windows by default, or is this something different? Did you tell grub to write to the MBR, or to the partition where you installed CentOS? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
Quoting David Hláèik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links for CentOS Live CD project (http://wiki.centos.org/Projects) . Where can i find and download it please? thanks ! D. http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.1-i386-LiveCD.iso ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why project pages are not working? D. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Barry Brimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting David Hláèik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links for CentOS Live CD project (http://wiki.centos.org/Projects) . Where can i find and download it please? thanks ! D. http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.1-i386-LiveCD.iso ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mdadm update
Hi, I have uptodate x86_64 CentOS 5 with official repositories. mdadm version is v2.5.4 - 13 October 2006 This version is known to have problems with raid10 configurations. Sadly, I have a 4 disk raid10 on this system. I tried adding Dag's repository but system complains about some packages which are already installed as missing and refuses to # yum update This box also has some modifications so I do not want to change repository settings. I want to update mdadm. Can I use standalone rpm file for this update? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
I have question - why you need live CD for server distribution such as CentOS? For desktop distributions such as Fedora or Ubuntu this is natural, but for server? Thank you for answer ;) 2008/5/12 David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why project pages are not working? D. On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Barry Brimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting David Hláèik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As far as i am searching over internet, i am finding only dead links for CentOS Live CD project (http://wiki.centos.org/Projects) . Where can i find and download it please? thanks ! D. http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/centos/5.1/isos/i386/CentOS-5.1-i386-LiveCD.iso ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:41:59PM +0200, happymaster23 enlightened us: I have question - why you need live CD for server distribution such as CentOS? For desktop distributions such as Fedora or Ubuntu this is natural, but for server? Thank you for answer ;) First thing that comes to mind is to test hardware support. Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] broken GFS
This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc on my cluster. I truly wish they would not do that :). I guess I shall have to not allow automatic yum updates from these machines. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 WXP
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you tell grub to write to the MBR, or to the partition where you installed CentOS? I looked at that screen and took the default, which, IIRC, was to write to the MBR. (I couldn't see the point of writing to the partition) mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a yum update and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). I am not very comfortable with it (indeed I am a pro gentooer for 5-7 years) On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc on my cluster. I truly wish they would not do that :). I guess I shall have to not allow automatic yum updates from these machines. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] broken GFS
This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc on my cluster. I truly wish they would not do that :). I guess I shall have to not allow automatic yum updates from these machines. Use the yum's exclude functionality. Man yum.conf for the syntax. I think it will just be exclude=kernel. You also might want to remove the non gfs kernels from your installation and get a staging environment for patching set up (if this is a production system). Best Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a yum update and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your own setup. Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to mount the XFS filesystem. I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpoqJrT1KNlf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
Tru, I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work? On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:48 +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a yum update and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your own setup. Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to mount the XFS filesystem. I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS... Tru ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
David Hláčik wrote: Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why project pages are not working? D. David, the machines that host projects.centos.org were moved a few days back, and were not totally back into production as yet. It should all be sorted now ( https://projects.centos.org/ ) . So if you still have issues with the projects.centos.org site, please let me know. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] GFS + quotas
I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client machine to check a users quota? Standard quota command on client machines do not work like they do when checking a non-gfs nfs mounted file system. The quotas do work however, when a user exceeds quota and tries to write a file, it tell them that quota has been exceeded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
Karanbir Singh wrote: David Hláčik wrote: Thanks i firured it out , sorry for stupid silly question, but why project pages are not working? D. David, the machines that host projects.centos.org were moved a few days back, and were not totally back into production as yet. It should all be sorted now ( https://projects.centos.org/ ) . So if you still have issues with the projects.centos.org site, please let me know. - KB Karanbir, I'm sure you're aware, but the certs don't match for https://projects.centos.org/ giving a warning. The cert is for w2.centos.org. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is centos live cd?
Ned Slider wrote: I'm sure you're aware, but the certs don't match for https://projects.centos.org/ giving a warning. The cert is for w2.centos.org. I did see it, but did not fix it yet. Will get it done soon. SSL does not seem to like me today :/ -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
Upstream updates cluster packages about a week after OS patches. I found that out when putting in a new cluster and 4.6 came out. The cluster packages lagged behind a week deliberately for stability's sake. Scott On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tru, I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work? On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:48 +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a yum update and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your own setup. Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to mount the XFS filesystem. I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS... Tru ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote: Tru, Hi Doug, I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Sure, but they could probably understand if it's 'critical' ;) Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded CentOS can't rebuild if upstream hasn't released the corresponding src.rpm. Upstream's GFS is often released later than the kernel RHSA... with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work? No idea. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpBkO33c4XUl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS + quotas
Use gfs_quota command. man gfs_quota *gfs_quota* list|sync|get|limit|warn|check|init [*OPTION]* ** On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Doug Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client machine to check a users quota? Standard quota command on client machines do not work like they do when checking a non-gfs nfs mounted file system. The quotas do work however, when a user exceeds quota and tries to write a file, it tell them that quota has been exceeded. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... I did a yum update and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your own setup. Indeed that was my low-value testing machine. But I cannot afford a third machine just for testing with the same hardware. Besides, if you suggest a VM testing, it is not a real testing, not better than you people do... Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to mount the XFS filesystem. What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, show me a way to prove. I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS... Neither I am a troll, nor do I know its meaning. And I do not have an intention to blame CentOS for anything. I have to use CentOS because it's the best of the choises CPanel requires. I am not keen on CentOS way of eating yoghurt. [1] This log is after update reboot: May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode And this is the last yum.log beginning from a month before: --- Apr 02 23:40:03 Updated: krb5-libs.x86_64 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:40:04 Updated: cups-libs.x86_64 1:1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6 Apr 02 23:40:04 Updated: openldap.x86_64 2.3.27-8.el5_1.3 Apr 02 23:40:05 Updated: dbus.x86_64 1.0.0-6.3.el5_1 Apr 02 23:40:11 Updated: ghostscript.x86_64 8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:40:12 Updated: tk.x86_64 8.4.13-5.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:40:13 Updated: kpartx.x86_64 0.4.7-12.el5_1.3 Apr 02 23:40:13 Updated: device-mapper-multipath.x86_64 0.4.7-12.el5_1.3 Apr 02 23:40:23 Updated: cups.x86_64 1:1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6 Apr 02 23:40:23 Updated: autofs.x86_64 1:5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.3 Apr 02 23:40:23 Updated: krb5-libs.i386 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:40:24 Updated: cups-libs.i386 1:1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6 Apr 02 23:40:33 Updated: ghostscript.i386 8.15.2-9.1.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:40:33 Updated: dbus.i386 1.0.0-6.3.el5_1 Apr 02 23:40:33 Updated: openldap.i386 2.3.27-8.el5_1.3 Apr 02 23:40:34 Updated: tk.i386 8.4.13-5.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:41:13 Installed: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 Apr 02 23:41:23 Updated: tzdata.noarch 2007k-2.el5 Apr 02 23:41:24 Updated: krb5-devel.i386 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:41:25 Updated: krb5-workstation.x86_64 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:41:26 Updated: krb5-devel.x86_64 1.6.1-17.el5_1.1 Apr 02 23:41:30 Updated: kernel-headers.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 Apr 02 23:41:30 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.14.el5 May 11 00:34:48 Updated: ImageMagick.x86_64 6.2.8.0-4.el5_1.1 May 11 00:34:52 Updated: ImageMagick.i386 6.2.8.0-4.el5_1.1 May 11 00:34:57 Updated: kernel-headers.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.19.el5 May 11 00:35:04 Updated: squid.x86_64 7:2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3 May 11 00:35:04 Updated: sos.noarch 1.7-9.2.el5 May 11 00:35:36 Installed: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.19.el5 May 11 01:28:19 Installed: hddtemp.x86_64 0.3-0.14.beta15.el5.centos May 11 01:40:35 Installed: apt.x86_64 0.5.15lorg3.2-1.el5.rf May 11 17:13:03 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.19.el5 According to this, there is a mystery in May 11 16:06:03 because there WAS a kmod_xfs but it was 53.1.14, not 53.1.19 as updated kernel. By the way, sorry for stealing some GFS thread but I see something parallel in deep. Thanks. [1] There is a proverb like Every knight has his own way of eating yoghurt which means you can eat yoghurt in different ways and also envied people can eat it differently, which none of them is wrong. In the end, yoghurt, a very useful nutrient, is eaten anyway. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote: What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, show me a way to prove. /var/log/messages ? This log is after update reboot: May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode nothing more? Apr 02 23:41:30 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.14.el5 kmod-xfs for 2.6.18_53.1.14.el5 May 11 00:35:36 Installed: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.19.el5 ... May 11 17:13:03 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.19.el5 and the corresponding kmod-xfs module (2.6.18-53.1.19.el5) According to this, there is a mystery in May 11 16:06:03 because there WAS a kmod_xfs but it was 53.1.14, not 53.1.19 as updated kernel. too bad you rebooted 1 hour before the kernel-xfs module update. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp33QZqvymE7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote: What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, show me a way to prove. /var/log/messages ? Only a small part of it. This log is after update reboot: May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode nothing more? Well, that is the only unexpected part. Just to show that XFS module was loaded for WRONG kernel. As you said, you newer saw before. According to this, there is a mystery in May 11 16:06:03 because there WAS a kmod_xfs but it was 53.1.14, not 53.1.19 as updated kernel. too bad you rebooted 1 hour before the kernel-xfs module update. When was kernel-xfs module updated in repository? Just that time? If so too bad CentOS folks do not update every piece of kernel as a whole in repositories. Where is integrity? If not, yum update does not update everything at once. I have to run yum update twice maybe more. First it will load kernel then see that a new kernel is available, will go and bring its modules... Still, it is a bit annoying and confusing. I am beginning to think whether XFS is really supported in CentOS :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
on 5-12-2008 5:54 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:55 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys Jason Pyeron wrote: I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled. Is there a cmd line swith or env var? Why not sign packages you roll? It really isn't that hard. RPM does have It's a throw away project on a throwaway vm instance. issues with large keys, though - Key on the top1000 list aren't usable :) - I think 64kb is the maximum size. And: Setting gpgcheck to 0 in yum.conf should disable global gpg checking, you can turn it on for each repository in the .repo files under /etc/yum.repos.d/. So the choice of how you shoot yourself in the foot with unsigned packages is up to you :) But there are no (temporary) options from the command line? I haven't found any. Something like --nosign or --ignore-nokey would be great. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Reseted net statistics
on 5-11-2008 2:56 AM happymaster23 spake the following: Hi all, sometimes I�m checking status of my server with phpSysInfo, always is all right, but at May 8 I was experienced a big deviation. My machine was online for 12 days, but net statistics are reseted. I was checked /proc/net/dev and there are reseted net statistics too. How is this possible? Just before I was experienced this problem I was updating two packages with yum (perl-HTML-Parser.i386 3.56-5.el5 and epel-release.noarch 5-3). In /var/log/messages is nothing about it. At the same day someone attemped to log in to ssh (attack was about 10 hours long, but its impossible to break my server - Keep fooling yourself. Difficult to breal into-- maybe, but impossible -- I really doubt it. Every server can be broken into. Just some of them aren't worth the time it might take. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 WXP
on 5-12-2008 10:17 AM MHR spake the following: I got half way through an installation of CentOS on a box that has Window$ 98 in the first partition and Window$ XP in the second, where CentOS was designated for partitions 3 (/boot - 128MB) and 4 (/) and had some strange results. During the install, I changed the default OS to boot to Window$ (because I rarely use this machine, but others who don't have a clue use Wxx), but then while the packages were downloading, I left the machine alone. When I came back, it had rebooted to the DVD, so I pulled it out and rebooted again. It came up in the Windows boot selection screen (W98 or WXP), and never stopped at grub. Should I not have set it to go to Windows by default, or is this something different? Thanks. mhr It might not have finished the install, and something made it reboot before it had written the grub records. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: broken GFS
on 5-12-2008 2:20 PM Doug Tucker spake the following: Tru, I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work? Then don't turn on automatic updates. That way you can verify that the new modules are in place before setting that kernel as default and re-booting. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Curiosity when installing CentOS 5.1 in addition to W98 WXP
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 5-12-2008 10:17 AM MHR spake the following: It might not have finished the install, and something made it reboot before it had written the grub records. I figure I'll just start over and sit there to watch while I read a book or something. (sigh) Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Partly OT: Is there a DVD (or other) firmware flash download program for CentOS/Linux?
All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: broken GFS
on 5-12-2008 3:47 PM Linux spake the following: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote: What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, show me a way to prove. /var/log/messages ? Only a small part of it. This log is after update reboot: May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode nothing more? Well, that is the only unexpected part. Just to show that XFS module was loaded for WRONG kernel. As you said, you newer saw before. According to this, there is a mystery in May 11 16:06:03 because there WAS a kmod_xfs but it was 53.1.14, not 53.1.19 as updated kernel. too bad you rebooted 1 hour before the kernel-xfs module update. When was kernel-xfs module updated in repository? Just that time? If so too bad CentOS folks do not update every piece of kernel as a whole in repositories. Where is integrity? If not, yum update does not update everything at once. I have to run yum update twice maybe more. First it will load kernel then see that a new kernel is available, will go and bring its modules... Still, it is a bit annoying and confusing. I am beginning to think whether XFS is really supported in CentOS :) XFS is an add-on module that the CentOS developers added because people wanted it. The official filesystem of CentOS is the same one that upstream has in RHEL -- EXT3. To see if a filesystem is truly supported by a distro is to see if one can select it at install time. Everything else is added on for someone else's benefit. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: OT: YUM, RPM and PGP keys
on 5-12-2008 5:54 AM Jason Pyeron spake the following: -Original Message- Behalf Of Ralph Angenendt Jason Pyeron wrote: I was just about to ask the same, but for packages I just rolled. Is there a cmd line swith or env var? Why not sign packages you roll? It really isn't that hard. RPM does have It's a throw away project on a throwaway vm instance. issues with large keys, though - Key on the top1000 list aren't usable :) - I think 64kb is the maximum size. And: Setting gpgcheck to 0 in yum.conf should disable global gpg checking, you can turn it on for each repository in the .repo files under /etc/yum.repos.d/. So the choice of how you shoot yourself in the foot with unsigned packages is up to you :) But there are no (temporary) options from the command line? I haven't found any. Something like --nosign or --ignore-nokey would be great. I generally copy /etc/yum.conf to /etc/yum.localinstall.conf and change the gpgcheck flag to 0, then use yum -c /etc/yum.localinstall.conf localinstall package to install any unsigned packages. I've only used it with packages from a know good source (mostly locally built). Cliff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Partly OT: Is there a DVD (or other) firmware flash download program for CentOS/Linux?
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only Okay, I found dfutool - does anyone know if that is as generic as it sounds and can, in fact, update a DVD burner's firmware? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Partly OT: Is there a DVD (or other) firmware flash download program for CentOS/Linux?
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only Okay, I found dfutool - does anyone know if that is as generic as it sounds and can, in fact, update a DVD burner's firmware? It depends on the type of DVD burner. Most on the market these days the answer is no. Some probably can be but require using the software the hardware company uses to do so... in most cases that would require a windows software approach. Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 04:20:46 Doug Tucker wrote: Tru, I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that matter) and be lucky enough it would work? From my experience, if the production server is running OK, and the update is not security-related, then there is NO NEED to update in your situation. If you DO want to update for whatever reason, test it first in a testbed. Trust me. It comes from a traumatic experience :) -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 07:51:43 up 54 min, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Somewhat OT:
Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from network switches, I'd like to configure one only port of a given switch and that is used as templates for the rest of switch ports and the rest of the switches. I'd like to use some open source software that meet that features, and I want to avoid Nagios :) Could you recommend me someone? Thanks in advance -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from network switches, I'd like to configure one only port of a given switch and that is used as templates for the rest of switch ports and the rest of the switches. I'd like to use some open source software that meet that features, and I want to avoid Nagios :) Could you recommend me someone? Thanks in advance Have you looked at zenoss? www.zenoss.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:
2008/5/12 Ross Cavanagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from network switches, I'd like to configure one only port of a given switch and that is used as templates for the rest of switch ports and the rest of the switches. I'd like to use some open source software that meet that features, and I want to avoid Nagios :) Could you recommend me someone? Thanks in advance Have you looked at zenoss? www.zenoss.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos It's one of candidates... -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Somewhat OT:
Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a monitoring system that support snmp v3. I want to monitorize linux servers and network switches. Currently, I am trying to use zabbix, but sadly, it lack at present features that I need. For example, I want to get reporting screens with data and graphs from network switches, I'd like to configure one only port of a given switch and that is used as templates for the rest of switch ports and the rest of the switches. I'd like to use some open source software that meet that features, and I want to avoid Nagios :) Could you recommend me someone? OpenNMS will do most of this automatically if the snmp setup is the same on all the devices. Http://www.opennms.org. Installing from the yum repo that includes Sun java is the easiest approach. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Partly OT: Is there a DVD (or other) firmware flash download program for CentOS/Linux?
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:27 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I can see with google is sfdnwin.exe for Window$ only Okay, I found dfutool - does anyone know if that is as generic as it sounds and can, in fact, update a DVD burner's firmware? It depends on the type of DVD burner. Most on the market these days the answer is no. Some probably can be but require using the software the hardware company uses to do so... in most cases that would require a windows software approach. I haven't doen it for awhile, but last time I did it, a DOS based floppy (or CD if you prefer) did the job. I believe that Windows has become a generic term, vis-a-vis variorou prom/BIOS updates, really meaning DOS V7 or such. NB: This also seem to apply to HD diags/repair. I had a Seagate SATA drive that developed a couple bad sectors. I downloaded the dos diags and it successfully repaired the bad sectors. Smartctl tests now report no bad sectors. It was only two to start with, so the efffort seemed worthwhile. Been about a week now - results good so far. Thanks. mhr snip sig stuff BTW, there is a freedos version available which I've not used. But I do have DR DOS images available that I've used. WFM. HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Partly OT: Is there a DVD (or other) firmware flash download program for CentOS/Linux?
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 23:21 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:27 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:21 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:49 PM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip NB: This also seem to apply to HD diags/repair. I had a Seagate SATA drive that developed a couple bad sectors. I downloaded the dos diags and it successfully repaired the bad sectors. Smartctl tests now report no bad sectors. It was only two to start with, so the efffort seemed worthwhile. Been about a week now - results good so far. Thanks. mhr snip sig stuff BTW, there is a freedos version available which I've not used. But I do have DR DOS images available that I've used. WFM. HTH P.S. The Seagate software includes its own DOS OS for those of you contemplating any HD repair. It seems to be generic and it may be that other utilities would work with it as well. YMMV. -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] samba PDC
how to configure samba server to only authenticate the users. Means all the users profiles should be stored on the local PC itself. It should not be stored on the server. i am a beginner to linux i have installed Centos 5.1 Please help me out. i searched in google its no use. Regards, Gopinath M Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd. Smile... it increases your face value! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
