[CTRL] Who Knew? Israeli Company Mum About WTC Pullout

2002-09-03 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

Who Knew?

Israeli Company Mum About WTC Pullout



WTC investigators should follow the money trail. It could provide critical
information about the Sept. 11 terror attacks.



Exclusive to American Free Press

By Christopher Bollyn



While an Israeli real estate magnate from Australia insured his 99-year
lease on the retail space of the World Trade Center against terrorism, one
of Israel's biggest companies pulled out of the north tower just days
before Sept. 11.

AFP has learned from a reliable source in the shipping industry that Zim
American Israeli Shipping Co., Inc. broke the lease when it vacated the
rented offices on the 16th and 17th floors of the north tower of the World
Trade Center shortly before the Sept. 11 disaster.

According to the source, Zim's WTC office space had been leased until the
end of the year and the company lost $50,000 when it suddenly pulled out
in the beginning of September.

The parent company, Zim Israel Naviga tion Co., is nearly half-owned by
the state of Israel, the other half held by Israel Corp. Zim is one of the
world's largest container shipping companies, operating an international
network of shipping lines.

AFP repeatedly contacted Zim American Israeli Ship ping Co., Inc. at its
new American headquarters in Norfolk, Va., to inquire about the company's
pulling out of its WTC lease early.

AFP was told that the only person who could discuss the matter was the
company president, Shaul Cohen-Mintz, who was said to be unavailable until
Dec. 4.

AFP also contacted the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the
original owner of the World Trade Center, and was told to contact
Silverstein Properties, owner of the World Trade Center since July 24.

Silverstein passes all media related questions to the public relations
company of Howard J. Rubenstein, which also represents the state of
Israel.

Steve Solomon of Rubenstein told AFP that the company had no information
on the leases and advised AFP to contact the tenant directly.

Calls to Ezra Bentob of Zim's legal department were not returned.

An Israeli businessman from Australia, Frank Lowy, had recently acquired
the 99-year lease for the 425,000 square foot retail portion of World
Trade Center before the WTC attacks of Sept. 11, reported The Jerusalem
Post on Sept. 12.

Lowy is chairman and founder of Westfield Holdings, and the manager of
Westfield America Trust, which has a 57 percent stake in Westfield America
Inc. In April 2001, Westfield America agreed to pay $400 million for the
lease on the complex though only $133 million was paid; the rest was to be
made in ground lease payments.

Lowy is the second wealthiest man in Australia and was recently ranked as
the 209th wealthiest man in the world by Forbes magazine. Westfield is the
fourth-largest shopping mall owner, with operations in Austral ia, the
United States, the United Kingdom and New Zealand.

Westfield was insured against terrorist attacks and its earnings will not
be materially affected.

In a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange the retail chain said that
investment in the retail component of the World Trade Center is fully
insured for both capital and loss of income, adding the insurance
coverage includes acts of terrorism.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] How Israeli Terrorism and American Treason Caused the September Attack

2002-09-03 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.christianparty.net/israeliterrorism.htm

How Israeli terrorism and American treason caused the September Attack


If Osama bin Laden is the man behind the September 11 terrorist
attack on America, he obviously should suffer the ultimate punishment
for his crime. No person or nation that commits terrorism against
America should escape punishment.

But now I will make a statement that may shock you. If you agree that
those who commit terrorist acts against America should be punished,
then America should also put Israel at the top of our hit list --
because Israel has committed deliberate acts of terrorism and
treachery against the United States. I will also reveal strong
evidence indicating that Israel is responsible for the terror attacks
of September 11th.

This article will show that Israel has committed more terrorism in
the last half century than any other nation on earth. Increasing
numbers of people are aware of the fact that hundreds of thousands of
Palestinians, Lebanese and other Mideastern people have suffered from
Israeli invasion and terrorism. However, few people are aware of the
deliberate acts of Israeli treachery and terror committed against the
United States of America.

I will prove this charge against Israel and expose the long-running
treason against America that penetrates the highest echelons of the
U.S. Government.

Why was America attacked?

No one would argue that whatever his motivations, if bin Laden was
behind the horror of the WTC attacks, he deserves punishment for
killing so many innocent people. At the same time, it is vital that
we know why bin Laden and millions of others around the world have
come to hate America. Why are so many willing to risk or even
sacrifice their lives to get at us? I certainly hope no one reading
this is so naïve as to believe that the growing millions who hate
America do so because we are free. That canard has to be the most
ridiculous idea sold to the American people since the pet rock.

To end the threat of terrorism against the American people, we must
know the true reason why we are so hated. Modern technology makes
mass murder and terrorism so ridiculously easy that just about anyone
can do it. It cannot be stopped by military might. In fact, even the
brute force we are using in Afghanistan supposedly to wipe out terror
-- already shows signs of whipping up enough world wide hatred
against America to give rise to a thousand new terrorists for every
one terrorist we might kill.

Perhaps we should have enough courage to consider the possible
reasons why so many millions of people hate us. Only when we have all
the facts, rather than cute little clichés like They were attacking
freedom, can we decide the best way to protect our people in the
future.

And, perhaps we should ask the media how they define an attack on
American freedom? I would say that a real attack on freedom is
trashing the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United
States. The Ten Amendments are the very core of what American freedom
actually is. George Bush and the U.S. Congress, armed with the
Orwellian U.S.A. Patriot Act, did infinitely more to take away our
Constitutional freedoms than bin Laden ever could.

The real reason we have suffered terrorism

The real reason US has suffered the terrorism of the WTC attack is
shockingly simple.

Too many American politicians have betrayed the American people and
their true interests by blindly supporting the leading terrorist
nation on earth: Israel.

The American mass media and the government cannot have it both ways.
If they are motivated to attack Afghanistan for giving aid and
comfort to terrorists, then some Palestinians naturally find
motivation to attack America for giving aid and even military support
to Israel, a nation that has committed unrelenting terrorism against
them.

Traitors to the United States have allowed a terrorist foreign nation
to control the United States Government. Some readers might think it
preposterous for me to assert that a foreign nation controls America.
But, consider the fact that the former head of the United States
Senate Foreign Relations Committee, William Fulbright, said precisely
that. He asserted on ABC's Face the Nation television program that
Israel Controls the United States Senate. And, Senator Fulbright
was no dummy; it is in his name that the brightest students scramble
after the so-named Fulbright scholarships. Senator Fulbright is not
the only one to make this indictment; many other important members of
the U.S. Government have made such charges. Here's what General
George Brown said when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

We can say we can't possibly get the Congress to support a (Israeli)
program like this. And they say don't worry about the Congress. We
will take care of the Congress. This is somebody from another
country, but they can do it. They own, you know, the banks in this
country, the newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish 

[CTRL] For your attention

2002-09-03 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

-Caveat Lector-

Euphorian spotted this on the Guardian Unlimited site and thought you should see it.

---
Note from Euphorian:

More abuse by the Church
---

To see this story with its related links on the Guardian Unlimited site, go to 
http://www.guardian.co.uk

LA cathedral stirs wrath of the faithful
$200m wasted as city's poor suffer, say Catholic protesters
Duncan Campbell in Los Angeles
Monday September 02 2002
The Guardian


The first cathedral built in the United States for three decades opened yesterday amid 
protests from Roman Catholics who say that the $200m cost of the building should have 
been spent on the poor.

All-night vigils were held by protesters describing the building as a fat cats' 
cathedral and by others critical of the church's handling of the sex scandals 
engulfing it.

The dedication of the cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels comes at an awkward moment 
for the church. Seventy-two current or former priests from the LA diocese alone are 
under criminal investigation and the church is embroiled in costly settlements with 
abuse victims. The city's Catholic archbishop, Cardinal Roger Mahony, has been widely 
attacked for not acting more speedily.

We think it is totally inappropriate to spend $200m on a building like this, said 
Catherine Morris of Catholic Worker, which has been working with the poor in LA since 
1970. The protesters claim that the cost of building has led to cuts in church social 
programmes.

The cathedral is situated in LA's civic, business and entertainment centre, close to 
what is possibly the largest Skid Row in the US, with around 4,000 people, many 
mentally ill, sleeping on the streets. The city and the church have been accused of 
ignoring them and the thousands of others who live in homeless hostels in the area.

Ms Morris said there were nearly 300 other churches in the archdiocese which could 
have been converted into a cathedral and the $195m thus saved could have been spent 
in more productive ways.

She added: We have layers and layers of poverty in this country and layers and layers 
of poverty in this city that could have been addressed. There are so many needs. It is 
unconscionable to make a spectacle out of the spending of money on a building.

The cathedral is being built in the part of the city associated with government, 
business and culture but the church's founder, Jesus, lived in the margins.

Alice Callaghan, of Las Familias del Pueblo, which works with the homeless, agreed. 
They are spending $200m on the cathedral but how much on God's poor? In response to 
the criticism, they have hired one nun - one nun - to do outreach. It's ludicrous ... 
I think it's very appropriate that they have built it in the entertainment district.

The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests also attacked the lavish nature of 
the opening ceremony which was attended by 3,000 guests.

Money for the cathedral has been raised with the help of high-profile donors including 
Rupert Murdoch, who gave $10m, Bob Hope and Roy Disney. Money will also be raised by 
selling resting places in the crypts for $50,000 each.

Cardinal Mahony said yesterday that he hoped the cathedral would be the new people's 
church, representing a new beginning that would outlast scandals.

Designed by the modernist Spanish architect Jose Rafael Moneo, the new cathedral has 
taken five years to build. The previous cathedral was damaged by the 1994 earthquake.

Visually, the new building has won some plaudits. The 25-tonne bronze doors and the 
sculpture of Mary above them have been widely praised. But some critics have nicknamed 
the building the yellow armadillo.

Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] A washingtonpost.com article from: alamaine@uffdaonline.net

2002-09-03 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

-Caveat Lector-

You have been sent this message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a courtesy of the 
Washington Post - http://www.washingtonpost.com



 To view the entire article, go to 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27535-2002Sep2.html

 Al Qaeda Gold Moved to Sudan

 By Douglas Farah
 Financial officers of al Qaeda and the Taliban have quietly shipped large quantities 
of gold out of Pakistan to Sudan in recent weeks, transiting through the United Arab 
Emirates and Iran, according to European, Pakistani and U.S. investigators.

 The sources said several shipments of boxes of gold, usually disguised as other 
products, were taken by small boat from the Pakistani port of Karachi to either Iran 
or Dubai, and from there mixed with other goods and flown by chartered airplanes to 
Khartoum, the Sudanese capital.

  Although it is not clear how much gold has been moved, U.S. and European officials 
said the quantity was significant and was an important indicator that the al Qaeda 
network and members of Afghanistan's deposed Taliban militia still had access to large 
financial reserves.

 European and U.S. intelligence officials said the movement of gold also highlighted 
three significant developments in the war on terrorism: the growing role of Iranian 
intelligence units allied with the country's hard-line clerics in protecting and 
aiding al Qaeda; the potential reemergence of Sudan as a financial center for the 
organization; and the ability of the terrorist group to generate new sources of 
revenue despite the global crackdown on its finances.

  The sources said Sudan may have been chosen because Osama bin Laden, the Saudi-born 
al Qaeda leader, and other members of the network are familiar with the country and 
retain business contacts there. They said traditional havens for al Qaeda money on the 
Arabian peninsula such as Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates were under intense 
international scrutiny, while transactions in Sudan could more easily pass unnoticed.

 Gold has for years been the preferred financial instrument of the Taliban and al 
Qaeda. Most of the Taliban treasury was kept in gold when the militia ruled 
Afghanistan, and taxes were often collected in gold. Just before the Taliban and al 
Qaeda were driven from Afghanistan last year, the two groups shipped large amounts of 
gold to Dubai, and from there to other safe havens, according to U.S., European and 
Arab officials.

  Senior U.S. intelligence officials said they are investigating the information about 
the new gold shipments and had opened a case on the matter but had no further comment. 
We know they are looking at new sources of revenue and are finding new ways to raise 
and move funds to where they are accessible, a U.S. official said. The bankers are 
the ones that move the money and the bankers are not sitting in caves in Afghanistan.

  European and U.S. sources said they became aware of the shipments after they 
occurred, and have asked the Sudanese government to take measures to halt the flow. A 
spokesman for the Sudanese Embassy in Washington said he had no official information 
about the shipments and found the information hard to believe.

 Sudan is not going to allow anything like this to come in knowingly, the official 
said. We are concerned about terrorism. We are on a high level of alert since 
September 11.

 But European intelligence sources said one of the hubs of bin Laden's organization 
continues to be Sudan, where he lived from 1991 to 1996, when he was forced to move to 
Afghanistan.

 Although the United States and other countries have praised Sudan for its cooperation 
in the war on terrorism, European and U.S. officials say that bin Laden, who invested 
tens of millions of dollars in the country when it harbored him, continues to have 
economic interests there. While living in Sudan, bin Laden operated a large 
construction business, bought extensive land holdings and helped found a bank.

  A senior European intelligence official said there was growing evidence that 
Khartoum was again serving as a sort of hub for al Qaeda business transactions. He 
has banking contacts there, he has business contacts there and he is intimately 
familiar with the political and intelligence structure there, the official said. He 
never fully left Sudan despite moving to Afghanistan.

 The gold appears to be the fruit of what one Pakistani businessman knowledgeable of 
Taliban financing called a commodity for commodity exchange, with the Taliban and al 
Qaeda trading opium and heroin for gold. When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, according 
to Pakistani intelligence officials, it actively engaged in opium and heroin 
production, and allowed al Qaeda to raise funds through taxing the cultivation of 
poppy, the raw material for heroin.

 The Pakistani businessman said that over the past two months Pakistani intelligence 
has picked up numerous reports indicating that al Qaeda and the Taliban were sending 

[CTRL] What War Looks Like, by Howard Zinn

2002-09-03 Thread A Progressive Reader

-Caveat Lector-

A visitor to our website (see reply to above) sent you this e-mail in order to share 
the following item from

The Progressive magazine
http://www.progressive.org

August 2002

What War Looks Like
By Howard Zinn

In all the solemn statements by self-important politicians and newspaper columnists 
about a coming war against Iraq, and even in the troubled comments by some who are 
opposed to the war, there is something missing. The talk is about strategy and 
tactics, geopolitics and personalities. It is about air war and ground war, weapons of 
mass destruction, arms inspections, alliances, oil, and regime change.

What is missing is what an American war on Iraq will do to tens of thousands or 
hundreds of thousands of ordinary human beings who are not concerned with geopolitics 
and military strategy, and who just want their children to live, to grow up. They are 
not concerned with national security but with personal security, with food and 
shelter and medical care and peace.

I am speaking of those Iraqis and those Americans who will, with absolute certainty, 
die in such a war, or lose arms or legs, or be blinded. Or they will be stricken with 
some strange and agonizing sickness that could lead to their bringing deformed 
children into the world (as happened to families in Vietnam, Iraq, and also the United 
States).

True, there has been some discussion of American casualties resulting from a land 
invasion of Iraq. But, as always when the strategists discuss this, the question is 
not about the wounded and dead as human beings, but about what number of American 
casualties would result in public withdrawal of support for the war, and what effect 
this would have on the upcoming elections for Congress and the Presidency.

That was uppermost in the mind of Lyndon Johnson, as we have learned from the tapes of 
his White House conversations. He worried about Americans dying if he escalated the 
war in Vietnam, but what most concerned him was his political future. If we pull out 
of Vietnam, he told his friend Senator Richard Russell, they'll impeach me, won't 
they?

In any case, American soldiers killed in war are always a matter of statistics. 
Individual human beings are missing in the numbers. It is left to the poets and 
novelists to take us by the shoulders and shake us and ask us to look and listen. In 
World War I, ten million men died on the battlefield, but we needed John Dos Passos to 
confront us with what that meant: In his novel 1919, he writes of the death of John 
Doe: In the tarpaper morgue at Chalons-sur-Marne in the reek of chloride of lime and 
the dead, they picked out the pine box that held all that was left of John Doe, the 
scraps of dried viscera and skin bundled in khaki.

Vietnam was a war that filled our heads with statistics, of which one stood out, 
embedded in the stark monument in Washington: 58,000 dead. But one would have to read 
the letters from soldiers just before they died to turn those statistics into human 
beings. And for all those not dead but mutilated in some way, the amputees and 
paraplegics, one would have to read Ron Kovic's account, in his memoir, Born on the 
Fourth of July, of how his spine was shattered and his life transformed.

As for the dead among the enemy--that is, those young men, conscripted or cajoled or 
persuaded to pit their bodies against those of our young men--that has not been a 
concern of our political leaders, our generals, our newspapers and magazines, our 
television networks. To this day, most Americans have no idea, or only the vaguest, of 
how many Vietnamese--soldiers and civilians (actually, a million of each)--died under 
American bombs and shells.

And for those who know the figures, the men, women, children behind the statistics 
remained unknown until a picture appeared of a Vietnamese girl running down a road, 
her skin shredding from napalm, until Americans saw photos of women and children 
huddled in a trench as GIs poured automatic rifle fire into their bodies.

Ten years ago, in that first war against Iraq, our leaders were proud of the fact that 
there were only a few hundred American casualties (one wonders if the families of 
those soldiers would endorse the word only). When a reporter asked General Colin 
Powell if he knew how many Iraqis died in that war, he replied: That is really not a 
matter I am terribly interested in. A high Pentagon official told The Boston Globe, 
To tell you the truth, we're not really focusing on this question.

Americans knew that this nation's casualties were few in the Gulf War, and a 
combination of government control of the press and the media's meek acceptance of that 
control ensured that the American people would not be confronted, as they had been in 
Vietnam, with Iraqi dead and dying.

There were occasional glimpses of the horrors inflicted on the people of Iraq, flashes 
of truth in the newspapers that quickly disappeared. In mid-February 1991, U.S. 

[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Was Robert Kennedy's Assassin Brainwashed?

2002-09-03 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---
-Caveat Lector-

The key pattern in  1. the Robert F. Kennedy assassination 2. the 911 WTC attacks 3. the 911 anthrax attacks  is an effort to frame and stir up violent hatred against Arabs.  Can you spell O-C-T-O-P-U-S?  The 911 anthrax attack letters were so crude and obvious in the forgery and  set-up department that they were jokes. The government has been pulling  out all the stops to conceal the true author of the letters.  Oh, and let us not forget the DELMART VREELAND letterblaming Iraq for  911. Who forged that letter and why? It fits the pattern.  Just connecting the obviousdots...  -BEGIN ARTICLE-  WAS ROBERT KENNEDY'S ASSASSIN BRAINWASHEDby Gordon Thomas  California' Supreme Court is considering ordering a new trial into one of  the most sensational crimes in America - the assassination of Senator Robert  Kennedy, brother of the murdered President, John F Kennedy.  The Court has been given explosive new testimony that Robert Kennedy's  assassin, Palestinian-born Sirhan Sirhan, was "programmed through hypnosis and  brainwashed to carry out the crime".  A new trial will seriously embarrass both the CIA and FBI - under  increasing fire for the cover-up of their failure in last September's terror  attacks.  The most likely date for the trial would fall during President Bush's  run-up to re-election.  His own father was Congressman during the murder of Robert Kennedy and  later became CIA director. Its files on the assassination have never been made  public.  Sirhan's attorney, Lawrence Teeter, a respected Civil Rights lawyer, has  spent eight years gathering evidence which he described last week, "virtually  proves that powerful branches of US government were behind the murder".  In an exclusive interview at his office on fashionable Wilshire Boulevard  in Los Angeles, Teeter said:  "When a powerful branch of government commits such a murder it only makes  sense if top people are involved. In the case of the programming of Sirhan those  involved, either directly or indirectly, are the Los Angeles police department,  the FBI and the CIA together with the Pentagon.

"There were good reasons for them to have wanted Robert Kennedy eliminated.
He wanted to end the Vietnam war. He wanted to get to the bottom of his
brother's assassination. He wanted to break the power of the Teamsters Union. He
wanted to end the wild adventurism of the CIA", said Teeter.

That "adventurism" included the notorious MK-ULTRA programme - designed by
the CIA to see if it was feasible to use drugs and hypnosis to create a
"programmed assassin".

Among the doctors secretly involved in the work was Dr Louis West, chairman
of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California in Los Angeles
and director of its Neuropsychiatric Institute.

West's work for the CIA included using hypnosis to try and programme minds.
But his case files were shredded in the wake of Robert Kennedy's murder on June
5, 1968. Kennedy was in Los Angeles to gather votes for his nomination as the
Democratic Candidate for President when he was killed.

West died earlier this year before Teeter could question him.

"That is very convenient for those who are trying to block the truth
emerging", Teeter said.

While some 50,000 documents relating to the murder of Robert Kennedy are
now stored in an archive at the University of Massachusetts, they do not contain
still-closed FBI files. A number of documents were also destroyed after the
investigation by the Los Angeles police.

Lawrence Teeter revealed that, when Sirhan was a jockey in 1966, he
received a head injury while riding. It happened two years before he
assassinated Robert Kennedy.

"As a 

[CTRL] International Criminal Court: No to US campaign against international justice

2002-09-03 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:00:36 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: International Criminal Court: No to US campaign against
international justice

* News Release Issued by the International Secretariat of Amnesty
International *

3 September 2002
IOR 30/007/2002


The international community must reject the US campaign against
international justice, Amnesty International said in a new report
released today.

  The USA has approached many governments requesting them
to sign agreements not to surrender or transfer US nationals to
the new International Criminal Court (ICC). It has already signed
such bilateral agreements with Israel, East Timor, Romania and
Tajikistan. The USA is exerting extreme pressure on states to
meet their demands, in many situations threatening to withdraw US
military assistance.

  Governments should refuse to sign agreements which would
give impunity to US nationals should they be accused of genocide,
crimes against humanity and war crimes.  The USA is demanding an
exemption for its nationals should they commit these crimes on
the territory of states that have ratified the ICC.

  These agreements seek to undermine and weaken the ICC
which was created to end impunity for the worst crimes known to
humanity, Amnesty International said.

  When legal advisers from the 15  European Union members
meet tomorrow, they should take the lead in stopping this
campaign by asking its member states to refuse bilateral
agreements.

  Amnesty International's report concludes that any state
that enters into an impunity agreement with the USA will violate
its obligations under international law.  The USA claim that the
impunity agreements are in accordance with international law is
wholly without merit. In fact, the agreements seek to manipulate
provision included to ensure that people accused of these crimes
are brought to justice.

Background
The Rome Statute of the ICC entered into force on 1 July 2002. As
of 30 August 2002, 78 states had ratified it; 139 states have
signed it.  The ICC is in the process of being established to
investigate and prosecute people accused of genocide, crimes
against humanity and war crimes, when national courts are unable
or unwilling to do so. It is expected that it will become fully
operational in the first half of 2003.

  The USA has been the only state actively to oppose the
establishment of the ICC. Since the adoption of the Rome Statute
in July 1998, the USA has sought an exemption for US nationals
from the jurisdiction of the Court.

  Amnesty International, other NGOs and governments have
repeatedly demonstrated that USA fears that the Court could be
used for politically motivated prosecutions against USA nationals
have no basis since the Rome Statute contains substantial
safeguards and fair trial guarantees.

  Countries that have ratified the Rome Statute are obliged
to comply with requests by the International Criminal Court to
arrest and surrender persons accused of genocide, crimes against
humanity and war crimes. Signing an impunity agreement with the
USA is contrary to a state's obligations under the Statute and
goes against the very purpose of the Statute which is to end
impunity for the worst crimes under international law.

  States that have signed the Rome Statute are obliged by
international law not to take any steps that would undermine the
Rome Statute.  Signing an impunity agreement with the USA is
clearly against the object and purpose of the Statute which is to
end impunity for the worst crimes under international law.

  All states -- regardless of whether they have ratified,
signed or not signed the Rome Statute -- that enter into impunity
agreements with the USA or refuse to arrest and surrender persons
accused by the ICC may violate their obligations under
international law to bring to justice those responsible for
genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.


For a copy of the report International Criminal Court: The US
efforts to obtain impunity for genocide, crimes against humanity
and war crimes, visit: www.amnesty.org/icc



You may repost this message onto other sources provided the main
text is not altered in any way and both the header crediting
Amnesty International and this footer remain intact. Only the
list subscription message may be removed.

To subscribe to amnesty-L, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with subscribe amnesty-L in the message body. To unsubscribe,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe amnesty-L
in the message body. If you have problem signing off, contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. [EMAIL PROTECTED] handles
only messages concerning list administration. Past and current Amnesty
news services can be found at 

[CTRL] The Patriotist - Alan Caruba

2002-09-03 Thread IGGY

-Caveat Lector-


http://www.patriotist.com/caruba.htm

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Title: The Patriotist - Alan Caruba
-Caveat Lector-














Alan Caruba






The Missing Towers



One gets a very strange feeling as they drive the looping curve of road that
leads to the entrance of the Lincoln Tunnel from the New Jersey side. From
here, particularly when the traffic was going slow, you could always look
over to your left and see the whole of lower Manhattan laid out in all its
splendor.



These days, one searches for the two gleaming towers that dominated the tip
of the island. Surely it is a dream. Surely, this time they will be there.
They are not.



As September 11, 2002 approaches, I keep thinking we should build those same
two towers again.



I keep thinking of lunches and dinners in Windows on the World, the splendid
restaurant that topped out one of the towers and, from which, walking the
full perimeter of the floor, one could look out at the extraordinary urban
landscape that is New York City and its boroughs, and across the river, New
Jersey. Down below, one could see the Statue of Liberty, looking very tiny in
the harbor.



It makes me angry.



It makes me angry to think that two planes, filled with innocent people, were
turned into flying bombs that literally decimated these two great structures,
these monuments to the economic vitality of this nation.



I want those towers back!



Forget about the new designs. They have already been dismissed and an
international search is on for still more. I say, take out the architectural
plans for the Twin Towers and rebuild them! Tell the crazed Islamists that
they did not achieve anything and will not achieve anything. They have signed
the death warrant for fanatical, fundamentalist Islam.



Many years ago, I visited the Arizona Memorial in Pearl Harbor. I was a child
when the Japanese sneak attack awoke a sleeping nation, an isolationist
nation, to the reality that it had real enemies. Ironically, the boat I took
to get out to the site was filled mostly with Japanese tourists. What struck
me, once we got there, was that they would pause to pray in front of the
names of those who died that day, December 7, 1941, 'a day that will live in
infamy.'



The Arizona Memorial is a place of silence broken only by the waters that lap
at the twisted, rusting metal of the ship below and the beautiful arching
structure above.



I want the new Twin Towers to be a bustling, noisy place, filled with people
coming and going. Most will have been born after 9-11 and perhaps some will
pause to look at a wall filled with the names of the more than 2,800 who died
there on a long ago day in 2001.



I want the Towers back! I want them because this is America and we will not
be defeated.






For More Caruba Commentary, Click Here!





SEND THIS PAGE! | 
HOME | BACK TO TOP



The man who loves his country on its own account, and not merely for its trappings of interest or power, can never be divorced from it; can never refuse to come forward when he finds that she is engaged in dangers which he has the means of warding off.
 --Thomas Jefferson










 Site search
Web search


powered by 
FreeFind







Subscribe!



Get the Weekly Update!












ABOUT: THE PATRIOTIST | TERMS OF USE | SUPPORTSITE MAP | CONTACTS
Copyright © 1998 - 2002 PG/Media
This site built using Notepad!





A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not 

[CTRL] Saussy: Useful Knowledge About the Attack On America

2002-09-03 Thread Dale Stonehouse

-Caveat Lector-

Part 1. Continued at:

http://tuppersaussy.com/HTMFILES/index.htm

Abiding in Religious War:
Useful Knowledge About the Attack On America

by F. Tupper Saussy

Rulers of Evil was published by HarperCollins just weeks before September
11, 2001. None of the big papers reviewed it. I'm told this is because I
look at history a little too eccentrically.

Well, okay. The standard approach is to regard history as so many persons in
control of themselves doing what they think is the right thing.

My approach is to look at history as so many persons under religious oath
doing, whether right or wrong, what their superiors are divinely authorized
to command them to do.

The different approaches yield different pictures. Many readers believe that
mine, call it the ROE filter, yields the true one.

The ROE filter screens out emotionalism and bigotry. It grinds no axes. Nor
does it judge or condemn. It builds peace, security, and confidence on a
foundation of complicated forces understood.

The ROE filter reveals what individuals are authorized to do. If a woman is
authorized by a legitimate power in pursuit of justice to conspire or
assassinate or steal or deceive, the ROE filter presumes she does her job
well. If a man has taken an oath to suspend his own values in order to obey
those of a legitimate superior in pursuit of justice, the ROE filter credits
him with fidelity.

Writing about September 11, Andrew Sullivan declared in the New York Times
This Is A Religious War. Bravo, Andrew!

And how's this for religious war as policy? NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W.
BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority
vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby
proclaim Friday, September 14, 2001, as a National Day of Prayer and
Remembrance for the Victims of the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.
I ask that the people of the United States and places of worship mark this
National Day of Prayer and Remembrance with noontime memorial services, the
ringing of bells at that hour, and evening candlelight remembrance vigils.

The President has repeatedly termed government's response to 9/11 a
Crusade.

The ROE filter credits the President with correctly understanding that the
term Crusade defines religious war undertaken by the Roman Papacy in the
11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to win the Holy Land from the Muslims. Bravo,
Mr. President!

Every oathbound official deserves the presumption that he means what he
says. The President deserves no less. Therefore, how can I but conclude that
the American people are funding a Roman Catholic military venture?

If this strikes you as odd, then perhaps you can make use of the following
pages. They may help you abide the next few years of crusade...

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Mexicans growing opium poppies

2002-09-03 Thread ab
-Caveat Lector-





Farmers turn to opium poppies in Sierra Madre 


Monica Medel, EFE - 9/3/2002 

BASE VELASQUEZ, Guerrero - The western Sierra Madre 
Mountains, long a source of inspiration for writers and an area synonymous with 
gold prospecting, now offer a new found wealth: opium poppies. 

Hidden among the farthest reaches of the mountains' 
pines, cypresses and brush, opium poppies, the raw material for heroin, has 
become a fast ticket to prosperity for the area's impoverished residents. 


Poppy fields have sprouted up "in most of the 
highlands of (the states of) Guerrero, Durango, Sinaloa, Chihuahua and Nayarit" 
in western Mexico, regional army commander Gen. Audomaro Martinez told 
reporters. 

The seedpod of the Papaver somniferum is the source 
of opium, as well as all its derivatives, namely heroin, morphine and codeine. 


Poppies are being planted throughout the region in 
tiny plots measuring less than 3,000 square meters (32,000 square feet) at 
altitudes of between 1,500-2,500 meters (4,900-8,200 feet), together with corn 
and marijuana to camouflage the blooms. 

The small poppy fields, which are tucked away in 
hard-to-reach areas amid difficult terrain, must be spotted by helicopter or 
plane and then reached by foot, since spraying from the air is not feasible. 


To destroy a small crop, anti-drug agents have to 
walk long distances along footpaths while bearing the equipment needed to kill 
the illegal crops. 

The army conducts 45-day poppy eradication 
campaigns every two months, with the help of 385 bases employed exclusively for 
that purpose. Another 450 bases work to prevent the crops from coming down the 
mountains and being distributed. 

This year alone, 106,698 poppy and 122,299 
marijuana fields - spread over 17,852 hectares (44,000 acres) of land - have 
been destroyed. Authorities have also seized 45 kilos of heroin, 404 kilos of 
poppy pods, 35.3 kilos of opium gum and 342.4 tons of marijuana. 

Although Mexico plays a small role in the global 
opium market which is controlled primarily by Afghanistan, Burma, Laos and 
increasingly Colombia, the rapid proliferation of poppy fields here, as well as 
the increasing use of the extensive northern border to smuggle opium-based 
narcotics into the United States, have anti-drug authorities concerned. 


The majority of the world's opium poppies are grown 
in the dry, warm and narrow 4,500-mile stretch of mountains extending across 
southern Asia from Turkey through Pakistan and Laos. Seeds planted in July and 
August there yield poppies ready for harvest in December. 

But the temperate Sierra Madre Occidental climate 
in the southern state of Guerrero makes opium harvests possible year round, 
providing producers with a continual source of the raw material needed to make 
heroin. 

A hectare (2.5 acres) of poppies produces eight 
kilos of opium gum, which in turn can produce a kilo of heroin that can be sold 
for several thousand dollars, a virtual fortune for the area's farmers. 


About three months after the poppy seeds are 
planted, brightly colored flowers bloom. As the petals fall away, an egg-shaped 
seed pod is exposed which when cut open produces an opaque, milky sap that 
quickly turns black, dries and forms opium gum. 

Mainly women and children due to the delicateness 
of the process perform the harvest, army officials told the press. 

The opium gum is later processed in labs hidden in 
central Mexico. 

The same criminal organizations that control 
Mexico's cocaine trade also smuggle heroin into the U.S.: the Tijuana, Juarez 
and Gulf cartels, all of which grew in strength following the demise of 
Colombia's Cali and Medellin cartels. 

The U.S. State Department fact sheet on drug 
production issued last March said Mexico had become one of the main sources of 
heroin, amphetamines and marijuana for the U.S., as well as the corridor through 
which more than half of the cocaine sold on U.S. streets is smuggled. Send this 
page to a friend

This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available 
for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm

http://www.thenewsmexico.com/noticia.asp?id=34345
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

Re: [CTRL] Mexicans growing opium poppies

2002-09-03 Thread thew
Title: Re: [CTRL] Mexicans growing opium poppies
-Caveat Lector-




Good news

With a good enough Mexican crop we can bankrupt Islamic fundamentalism






on 9/3/02 1:04 PM, ab at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

-Caveat Lector- 

 
Farmers turn to opium poppies in Sierra Madre 
 
Monica Medel, EFE - 9/3/2002 
 
BASE VELASQUEZ, Guerrero - The western Sierra Madre Mountains, long a source of inspiration for writers and an area synonymous with gold prospecting, now offer a new found wealth: opium poppies. 
 
Hidden among the farthest reaches of the mountains' pines, cypresses and brush, opium poppies, the raw material for heroin, has become a fast ticket to prosperity for the area's impoverished residents. 
 
Poppy fields have sprouted up in most of the highlands of (the states of) Guerrero, Durango, Sinaloa, Chihuahua and Nayarit in western Mexico, regional army commander Gen. Audomaro Martinez told reporters. 
 
The seedpod of the Papaver somniferum is the source of opium, as well as all its derivatives, namely heroin, morphine and codeine. 
 
Poppies are being planted throughout the region in tiny plots measuring less than 3,000 square meters (32,000 square feet) at altitudes of between 1,500-2,500 meters (4,900-8,200 feet), together with corn and marijuana to camouflage the blooms. 
 
The small poppy fields, which are tucked away in hard-to-reach areas amid difficult terrain, must be spotted by helicopter or plane and then reached by foot, since spraying from the air is not feasible. 
 
To destroy a small crop, anti-drug agents have to walk long distances along footpaths while bearing the equipment needed to kill the illegal crops. 
 
The army conducts 45-day poppy eradication campaigns every two months, with the help of 385 bases employed exclusively for that purpose. Another 450 bases work to prevent the crops from coming down the mountains and being distributed. 
 
This year alone, 106,698 poppy and 122,299 marijuana fields - spread over 17,852 hectares (44,000 acres) of land - have been destroyed. Authorities have also seized 45 kilos of heroin, 404 kilos of poppy pods, 35.3 kilos of opium gum and 342.4 tons of marijuana. 
 
Although Mexico plays a small role in the global opium market which is controlled primarily by Afghanistan, Burma, Laos and increasingly Colombia, the rapid proliferation of poppy fields here, as well as the increasing use of the extensive northern border to smuggle opium-based narcotics into the United States, have anti-drug authorities concerned. 
 
The majority of the world's opium poppies are grown in the dry, warm and narrow 4,500-mile stretch of mountains extending across southern Asia from Turkey through Pakistan and Laos. Seeds planted in July and August there yield poppies ready for harvest in December. 
 
But the temperate Sierra Madre Occidental climate in the southern state of Guerrero makes opium harvests possible year round, providing producers with a continual source of the raw material needed to make heroin. 
 
A hectare (2.5 acres) of poppies produces eight kilos of opium gum, which in turn can produce a kilo of heroin that can be sold for several thousand dollars, a virtual fortune for the area's farmers. 
 
About three months after the poppy seeds are planted, brightly colored flowers bloom. As the petals fall away, an egg-shaped seed pod is exposed which when cut open produces an opaque, milky sap that quickly turns black, dries and forms opium gum. 
 
Mainly women and children due to the delicateness of the process perform the harvest, army officials told the press. 
 
The opium gum is later processed in labs hidden in central Mexico. 
 
The same criminal organizations that control Mexico's cocaine trade also smuggle heroin into the U.S.: the Tijuana, Juarez and Gulf cartels, all of which grew in strength following the demise of Colombia's Cali and Medellin cartels. 
 
The U.S. State Department fact sheet on drug production issued last March said Mexico had become one of the main sources of heroin, amphetamines and marijuana for the U.S., as well as the corridor through which more than half of the cocaine sold on U.S. streets is smuggled. Send this page to a friend
 
This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
 
http://www.thenewsmexico.com/noticia.asp?id=34345
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/www.ctrl.org/A" DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. 

Let us 

[CTRL] The Order of Skull Bones is the Wizard of Oz!

2002-09-03 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-

A book review:
Secrets of the Tomb
Alexandra Robbins@2002
Brown  Little
230 pages

by
Kris Millegan
www.ctrl.org



The Order of Skull  Bones is the Wizard of Oz!
Presidents are just assassinated!
There is no conspiracy!

It’s just nec-essary for us barbarians to be able to make sense of the
world!

Whitewash, Smokescreen, Disinformation and Modified Limited Hang-out

Recent Yale graduate, Alexandra Robbins’s new book, Secrets of the Tomb –
Skull and Bones, The Ivy League, And The Hidden Paths of Power portends to be
an exposé, but in reality is a response by Bones to its critics, an apologia
and… more skullduggery. Ms. Robbins, claims to be a member of one of Yale’s
seven senior secret societies (she never reveals which one) writes:

 The rumors and conspiracy theories about Skull and Bones,… are widespread
and deep-rooted.… the most fascinating thing I learned through my interviews
with members of Skull and Bones is that the majority of rumors were carefully
planted by the Bonesmen themselves.
And,
Skull  Bones is at its core, equivalent to the Wizard of Oz, the puny but
cunning man hidden behind a curtain of mystique, projecting images that
inspire awe and terror in order to expand himself into something great and
terrible.
And,
If the Wizard of Oz can represent Skull and Bones, then one must point out
that, for a while, Oz needed its Wizard to provide balance and a constant
current of reassurance. [emphasis in original]

According to Ms. Robbins, The Order of Skull  Bones is all just a façade and
the conspiracy theories are created out of a psychological need of us
barbarians. It’s just a frat house that taps into the power of the Ivy
League old boy network. Just a bonding thing, Skull and Bones isn’t
cultlike but its critics are.

The Bonesmen cannot see the outside world without first looking through the
Bones-constructed prism; at the same time, the outside world cannot see into
Bones headquarters—instead, barbarians can only project their own imagery
onto the, blank, brown walls of the tomb. Which they do. Often. At great
length. The attention paid to Skull and Bones is cultlike, and it has grown
exponentially in recent years because of the Bush dynasty and the expansion
of the Internet, which has provided a most convenient medium through which to
discuss and expound on conspiratorial ties. Skull and Bones is not a legend
just to those who live it. To barbarians also, it is more than merely an
institution; it is a concept onto which people project the images necessary
for them to be able to make sense of the world. However sinister the notion
of an all-powerful secret society might be, the existence of a Skull and
Bones also brings us some measure of relief. The secret soci-ety allows us to
believe that things don’t just happen: genocide isn’t just caused by one
crazy individual, presidents aren’t just assassinated, family political
dynasties aren’t just born. Even chaos, the society’s con-spiracy theories
tell us, has causality. The secret society—like the power of the elitist,
old-school colleges, the small groups of mogul networks, and the political
dynasties—survives because people like to believe that seemingly random
events are orchestrated by someone or something in control. We’ve all done a
good job of keeping the quintessential mystery alive, one patriarch said to
me, because people don’t believe this is all we do. Perhaps one of the
reasons people are so fascinated with con-spiracy theories, particularly the
far-reaching networks associated with secret societies and old-school power,
is that they need causality in much the same way as they need a God. People’s
need for the Skull and Bones conspiracies to elucidate an underlying order is
similar to the need for religion to explain death and purpose. Underground
control suggests order and order implies reason. Explanations, however
implausible, are somehow reassuring.


The psychological underpinnings, the rhetoric and the techniques used to
massage the message in this book I find very interesting. Also, her use of
the term barbarians to refer to non-members and her use of Bone’s terms of
deference to older members, I also find interesting.

Ms. Robbins takes a swipe at the sinister views of Bones with an
exaggerated and shunted version of many of the allegations about Bones in an
introduction titled The Legends of Skull and Bones. By mixing reality with
known myth Ms. Robbins clumsily tosses aside many historical tragedies
brought about by the elite deviance of Bones and its cohorts.  She then
proceeds to tell us What follows, then is the truth about Skull and Bones.
But by simply not addressing many of the allegations against Bones that she
brings up in her legends she lays down more smoke and mirrors on the whole
subject of what is real and what is fiction, even ending her book with more
of the same:

Whether the legend of Skull and Bones reflects a sinister veracity or a
prismatic distortion depends almost entirely on 

[CTRL] Russia to Ratify Kyoto Protocol

2002-09-03 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

U.S. Environmental Protection Administrator Christie Whitman said Tuesday
the United States supported other countries' ratification of the deal. But
she said the agreement was not appropriate for the United States, which is
taking other action to limit climate change.  (Chemtrails? --SW)

Russia to Ratify Kyoto Protocol

Tue Sep 3,12:07 PM ET

By ALEXANDRA ZAVIS, Associated Press Writer

As negotiators finished a global plan to tackle poverty and save the
environment, Russia said Tuesday it will soon ratify the Kyoto Protocol (
news - web sites) — a move that would bring the key climate change agreement
into effect.

Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov was among a series of leaders at the
World Summit urging action on Kyoto. He said his country planned to ratify
the agreement in the very near future, but did not specify when.

Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien said Monday he would submit the
protocol to his Parliament to consider ratification, and China announced
Tuesday it had already ratified it.

Different countries have different conditions, however, we should all
endeavor to take responsibility for the whole world, said Xie Zhenhua,
China's minister of environmental protection.

The United States has been relentlessly criticized for its rejection of the
1997 Kyoto deal, which requires industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse
gases blamed for global warming ( news - web sites). But the accord can still
come into effect if Russia joins the European Union ( news - web sites) and
Japan in ratifying.

Once the accord is in effect, the nations that have signed on — more than 70
so far — will be obliged by law to implement the emissions cuts it sets. The
United States, which rejected the accord last year, would not be so required.


U.S. Environmental Protection Administrator Christie Whitman said Tuesday the
United States supported other countries' ratification of the deal. But she
said the agreement was not appropriate for the United States, which is taking
other action to limit climate change.

The movement on the Kyoto Protocol came after negotiators in Johannesburg
late Monday reached agreement on their nonbinding action plan for sustainable
development. In one provision of that plan worked out in a compromise with
the United States, nations backing Kyoto strongly urge states that have not
done so to ratify it in a timely manner.

On the sidelines of the summit, Iraq said it was ready to discuss a return of
U.N. weapons inspectors, but only in conjunction with ending sanctions and
restoring Iraqi sovereignty over all its territory.

If you want to find a solution, you have to find a solution for all these
matters, not only pick up one certain aspect of it, Iraqi Deputy Prime
Minister Tariq Aziz said after a 20-minute meeting Tuesday with U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan ( news - web sites).

Annan urged Aziz to comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions, which call
for the unconditional return of inspectors, his spokeswoman said.

Fifty heads of state and other dignitaries were addressing the World Summit
on Tuesday. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell ( news - web sites) was to
address the summit Wednesday — closing day — on behalf of President Bush (
news - web sites), who has been criticized for not attending.

Late Monday, negotiators resolved the last main sticking points in a 70-odd
page action plan covering energy, clean water, biodiversity, health and
sanitation. Most of the items were geared to helping the world's poorest
people without polluting.

Summit Secretary-General Nitin Desai praised the plan as a strong blueprint.


The test is whether governments, along with civil society and the private
sector, can pursue the commitments that are in the document, he said.

After losing its push to set targets in the plan for increasing the use of
wind and solar energy, the European Union said Tuesday it would form a
coalition of like-minded countries and regions willing to commit to such
timetables.

EU Energy Commissioner Margot Wallstrom said the initial response from
countries in Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean had been positive.

Many developing countries had sided with the United States and Japan against
including the targets in the summit's plan, arguing they were a rich
country's luxury.

After more than a week of tough bargaining, the agreed text includes a
commitment to urgently increase the use of renewable energy sources but
says cleaner use of fossil fuels is also acceptable.

The text also urges countries to reform subsidies that favor industrialized
countries or are harmful to the environment and commits to halving the 2
billion people living without proper sanitation by 2015.

The plan emphasizes the need for good governance to achieve sustainable
development but does not make it a condition for receiving aid as advocated
by the United States, diplomats said.

It may seem on the surface that the text does not do as much as some people
would 

[CTRL] The Order of Skull Bones is the Wizard of Oz! (edited)

2002-09-03 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-


A book review:
by
Kris Millegan
www.ctrl.org
-
Secrets of the Tomb
Alexandra Robbins@2002
Brown  Little
230 pages
-

The Order of Skull  Bones is the Wizard of Oz!
Presidents are just assassinated!
There is no conspiracy!

It’s just nec-essary for us barbarians to be able to make sense of the
world!

Whitewash, Smokescreen, Disinformation and Modified Limited Hang-out

Recent Yale graduate, Alexandra Robbins’s new book, Secrets of the Tomb –
Skull and Bones, The Ivy League, And The Hidden Paths of Power portends to be
an exposé, but in reality is a response by Bones to its critics, an apologia
and… more skullduggery. Ms. Robbins, claims to be a member of one of Yale’s
seven senior secret societies (she never reveals which one) writes:

 The rumors and conspiracy theories about Skull and Bones… are widespread
and deep-rooted… the most fascinating thing I learned through my interviews
with members of Skull and Bones is that the majority of rumors were carefully
planted by the Bonesmen themselves.
And,
Skull  Bones is at its core, equivalent to the Wizard of Oz, the puny but
cunning man hidden behind a curtain of mystique, projecting images that
inspire awe and terror in order to expand himself into something great and
terrible.
And,
If the Wizard of Oz can represent Skull and Bones, then one must point out
that, for a while, Oz 'needed' its Wizard to provide balance and a constant
current of reassurance. [Emphasis in original]

According to Ms. Robbins, The Order of Skull  Bones is all just a façade and
the conspiracy theories are created out of a psychological need of us
barbarians. It’s just a frat house that taps into the power of the Ivy
League old boy network. Just a bonding thing, Skull and Bones isn’t
cultlike but its critics are.

The Bonesmen cannot see the outside world without first looking through the
Bones-constructed prism; at the same time, the outside world cannot see into
Bones headquarters—instead, barbarians can only project their own imagery
onto the, blank, brown walls of the tomb. Which they do. Often. At great
length. The attention paid to Skull and Bones is cultlike, and it has grown
exponentially in recent years because of the Bush dynasty and the expansion
of the Internet, which has provided a most convenient medium through which to
discuss and expound on conspiratorial ties. Skull and Bones is not a legend
just to those who live it. To barbarians also, it is more than merely an
institution; it is a concept onto which people project the images necessary
for them to be able to make sense of the world. However sinister the notion
of an all-powerful secret society might be, the existence of a Skull and
Bones also brings us some measure of relief. The secret soci-ety allows us to
believe that things don’t just happen: genocide isn’t just caused by one
crazy individual, presidents aren’t just assassinated, family political
dynasties aren’t just born. Even chaos, the society’s con-spiracy theories
tell us, has causality. The secret society—like the power of the elitist,
old-school colleges, the small groups of mogul networks, and the political
dynasties—survives because people like to believe that seemingly random
events are orchestrated by someone or something in control. We’ve all done a
good job of keeping the quintessential mystery alive, one patriarch said to
me, because people don’t believe this is all we do. Perhaps one of the
reasons people are so fascinated with con-spiracy theories, particularly the
far-reaching networks associated with secret societies and old-school power,
is that they need causality in much the same way as they need a God. People’s
need for the Skull and Bones conspiracies to elucidate an underlying order is
similar to the need for religion to explain death and purpose. Underground
control suggests order and order implies reason. Explanations, however
implausible, are somehow reassuring.


The psychological underpinnings, the rhetoric and the techniques used to
massage the message in this book I find are very interesting. Also, her use
of the term barbarians to refer to non-members and her use of Bones’ terms of
deference to older members, I also find interesting.

Ms. Robbins takes a swipe at the sinister views of Bones with an
exaggerated and shunted version of many of the allegations about Bones in an
introduction titled The Legends of Skull and Bones. By mixing reality with
known myth Ms. Robbins clumsily tosses aside many historical tragedies
brought about by the elite deviance of Bones and its cohorts.  She then
proceeds to tell us What follows, then is the truth about Skull and Bones.
But by simply not addressing many of the allegations against Bones that she
brings up in her legends she lays down more smoke and mirrors on the whole
subject of what is real and what is fiction, even ending her book with more
of the same:

Whether the legend of Skull and 

[CTRL] NYTimes.com Article: 8,000 Forced to Flee Fire in California

2002-09-03 Thread Tenor Love

-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



8,000 Forced to Flee Fire in California

September 3, 2002
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS






AZUSA, Calif., Sept. 1 (AP) - A fire that forced 8,000
campers to flee with little more than the clothes on their
backs raged out of control today in a national forest near
Los Angeles, threatening more campgrounds.

The fire, in the Angeles National Forest, grew to 11,500
acres, and no one could say when it might be contained,
said Gwen Smith of the Forest Service.

The blaze was moving southeast toward two private
campgrounds with year-round residents, Ms. Smith said. No
evacuations were ordered.

Erratic winds were pushing the flames while helicopters
dropped water to help firefighters struggling through steep
terrain in temperatures well over 100 degrees.

The fire started on Sunday afternoon about 30 miles east of
downtown Los Angeles and spread rapidly, forcing the
evacuation of five campgrounds. Tents, food and even shoes
and clothing were left.

They told us we had 10 seconds to get out, to run,
Lisette Cardenas told KABC-TV in Los Angeles. You could
see the smoke right behind us.

Ms. Smith said humans apparently caused the fire, but
whether it was deliberately set was not clear.

Elsewhere in the region, firefighters working in 105-degree
heat and erratic winds made progress on a 977-acre blaze
near Castaic, about 40 miles northeast of Los Angeles.

The fire was 60 percent to 70 percent contained and was
expected to be surrounded by evening, Capt. Brian Jordan of
the Los Angeles County Fire Department said.

About 550 firefighters battled flames that leaped from
ridge to ridge, Captain Jordan said. Three firefighters
were treated for heat exhaustion, and one was treated for a
minor knee injury.

About two dozen firefighters were protecting a mobile home
park in the fire's path.

In San Bernardino County, a 554-acre fire was burning near
Wrightwood, about 55 miles northeast of Los Angeles. It was
about 61 percent contained, the authorities said.

Investigators found a body in the fire and determined that
a device found nearby was equipment for a mobile laboratory
used to make methamphetamine, a Forest Service spokeswoman,
Karen McKinley, said.

Investigators worked to determine whether the charred body
and the device were connected to the blaze, which started
on Thursday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/03/national/03FIRE.html?ex=1032083491ei=1en=c87cab23e80e9194



HOW TO ADVERTISE
-
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NYTimes.com Article: China Blocks Google Search Engine

2002-09-03 Thread Tenor Love

-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



China Blocks Google Search Engine

September 3, 2002
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS






Filed at 8:52 a.m. ET



BEIJING (AP) -- China has blocked access to popular U.S.
Internet search engine Google amid government calls to
tighten media controls ahead of a major Communist Party
congress.

Attempts to look at the site through Chinese Internet
services on Tuesday were rejected with a notice saying it
couldn't be found. Users and technical consultants who
monitor the Chinese Internet said the site has been blocked
for several days.

There was no immediate explanation for the blocking and
representatives for Google, based in Mountain View, Calif.,
were not immediately available for comment.

The government is preparing to hold a congress in November
that is expected to begin shifting power to a new
generation of leaders. China routinely tightens controls on
news and information around politically sensitive dates,
and state media quoted President Jiang Zemin in August as
telling propaganda officials to create a ``sound
atmosphere'' for the meeting.

Google is hugely popular among China's 45 million Internet
users because of its wide-ranging search capacity. A search
in English for Jiang's name turns up links to 156,000 Web
sites mentioning him.

By contrast, a search on Sina.com, another portal that is
popular in China, turns up just 1,600 mentions of Jiang.
The Chinese-language service of American search engine
Yahoo! turns up just 24 results.

Nor does Google weed out material that the Chinese
government blocks as subversive.

A search for Jiang on Google turns up a Web page posted by
the banned Falun Gong spiritual movement entitled
``Exposing the crimes of Jiang Zemin.'' The group accuses
Jiang of killing its followers in the course of a crackdown
aimed at eliminating the group, viewed as a threat to
communist control.

China promotes the Internet for economic use and to spread
the communist government's views. But it has worked hard to
muzzle the Internet as a forum for free information and
discussion.

Authorities apply blocks to prevent Internet users from
viewing sites run by Falun Gong, human rights groups and
some foreign news organizations.

Police monitor chat rooms and personal e-mail and erase
online content considered undesirable. Internet portals
have been warned they will be held responsible for sites
they host.

Nevertheless, many users find ways to get around the
blocks, said Duncan Clark, a technology analyst for
consulting firm BDA China.

They often involve using ``proxy servers'' -- Web sites
abroad that let users reach blocked sites. Such techniques
are routinely posted online in China or exchanged in chat
rooms.

``The restrictions only make people more creative,'' Clark
said.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-China-Google.html?ex=1032083609ei=1en=4ebb4867c4f06995



HOW TO ADVERTISE
-
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] ASHCROFT DOES NOT EQUAL FREEDOM

2002-09-03 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.stratiawire.com/



TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 03, 2002

ASHCROFT DOES NOT EQUAL FREEDOM

SEPTEMBER 3. There is wisdom in the law. One piece of that wisdom? You don’t start walking down a path, even timidly, that could lead to an abridgement of the Bill of Rights, because each step can take you toward a blanket denial of freedom. 

What starts out as a seemingly rational course of action can, later on, show its ugly fascist face in full bloom. 

Take Attorney General Ashcroft’s decision to institute prison camps for “enemy combatants.” Sounds reasonable. If people are plotting against America in a time of war, they should be detained. And if these people are American citizens, so what? They are traitors. They should be held by the authorities. 

Ashcroft has declared that such American prisoners can be jailed without specific charges being leveled against them, without the right to an attorney, without the right to communicate to anyone, INDEFINITELY. 

Of course, he, Ashcroft, or Bush, can decide who is an “enemy combatant.” 

Well, we say, Ashcroft won’t just order the arrest of Joe Smith who lives in Ohio, has a family, and runs a dry cleaning shop. Ashcroft will only order the arrest of a man with a funny-sounding name who has converted to Islam. 

Yes, well, even if that is true, Ashcroft has taken the first steps down the path to perdition. And three years or five years from now, there may be a Joe Smith in Ohio who DOES find himself behind bars without a lawyer, because he showed up at an anti-war rally. 

It’s the gradual erosion of the Bill of Rights. 

Step by step. 

Which is why there are laws against the detention of an American citizen, unless charges are filed, unless that citizen has the right to an attorney and a trial. 

The point is NOT whether you happen to think Ashcroft looks like a reasonable man. “Reasonable looking” is not part of the law. 

If tomorrow a reasonable looking scientist appears on a national news program, and if he says that a new genetic marker has been found that can predict future criminal behavior, then you might think, “Let’s test everybody and isolate all possible criminals.” 

Children often think this way. They see what seems to be a solution, and they fall in love with it. They think Utopia is just over the horizon. 

But we are not children. We have the wisdom of experience. We know what some people are capable of, even if they pretty much comb their hair the way we do, even if they wear the same suits other people wear, even if they smile the way others do, even if they “look like loyal Americans.” 

Children confuse protection with freedom. If states pass laws that say everyone must take vaccines as prevention against biowar plagues, children might think this is a good idea. 

Children might even snitch on their parents if their parents refuse to allow all the vaccines designed for kiddies. 

Children also tend to like uniforms. They might want to don black uniforms with insignias and march down the street in support of “the national effort against terrorism.” 

But we are not children. 

We are supposed to be able to see the more subtle shades of distinction. 

At the very least, we are supposed to call for the resignation of a public official who tries to scrap all the safeguards against a fascist court system. 

“But he looks all right.” 

I don’t care if he looks like Mickey Mouse in a Disney parade




A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] AMEC Destroys Evidence in WTC Cleanup Scam

2002-09-03 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/index.cfm



AMEC Destroys Evidence in WTC Cleanup Scam
 by CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN

A foreign company - headed by a Knight of the British Empire - managed the controversial clean-up of the rubble at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. 

Although the terror attacks of September 11 were clearly criminal acts of mass murder, no effort was made to preserve the integrity of the crime scenes and the essential evidence was disposed of like garbage. 

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was made a Knight of the British Empire - after he hired two large British construction management firms - both headed by Knights of the British Empire, to oversee what many experts consider to be massive criminal destruction of evidence. 

DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE 

The editor-in-chief of Fire Engineering magazine, William A. Manning, issued an urgent call to action to America s firefighters at the end of 2001, calling for a forensic investigation and demanding that the steel from the site be preserved to allow investigators to determine what caused the collapse.

The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately, Manning wrote. 

Such destruction of evidence, he said, shows the astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of the largest fire-induced collapse in world history. 

For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. 

Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, Manning says, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car. 

I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall, Manning said. 

Clearly, there are burning questions that need answers. Based on the incident's magnitude alone, a full-throttle, fully resourced, forensic investigation is imperative. 

Three months later, the Science Committee of the House of Representatives reported that the WTC investigation was hampered by the destruction of crucial evidence. 

The committee report of March 6, 2002 says, Some of the critical pieces of steel were gone before the first [investigator] ever reached the site. 

The investigation Manning called for never happened, and never will, because the essential evidence is now destroyed: Valuable evidence has been lost irretrievably, Chairman of the Science Committee, Sherwood L. Boehlert (R-NY) said. 

The [FEMA-sponsored] building performance assessment currently being conducted of the World Trade Center is just that: an assessment, not an investigation, Prof. Glenn Corbett of John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City told the Science Committee in March. 

Corbett had previously called the FEMA-led investigation uncoordinated and superficial. 

The World Trade Center disaster demands the most comprehensive detailed investigation possible. 

No event in our entire fire service history has ever come close to the magnitude of this incident, Corbett wrote in the January 2002 issue of Fire Engineering. 

You would think we would have the largest fire investigation in world history. You would be wrong, he wrote, We are literally treating the steel removed from the site like garbage, not like crucial fire scene evidence. 

WHO'S IN CHARGE? 

The New York Times was unable to find out who was behind the destruction of evidence. 

On Dec. 25, 2001, the Times reported, Officials in the mayor s office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three-day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation. 

I must say that the current investigation, some would argue that review is the more appropriate word, seems to be shrouded in excessive secrecy, Chairman Boehlert said. 

There are no clear lines of authority, he said, No one is in charge. 

Before the dust had settled on September 11, the mayor of New York City, Rudolph Giuliani, and Kenneth Holden of the city s Dept. of Design and Construction (DDC), contracted 4 major construction management companies to begin the removal of the debris from the World Trade Center. 

Three of the four major companies involved in the clean-up are foreign owned: AMEC, Bovis Lend Lease, both headquartered in London; and Turner, a subsidiary of Germany's Hochtief. 

Only Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, is a truly American-owned company. Peter Tully, president of the company, was, notably, the only person willing to speak openly with AFP about his work at the WTC site. 

The mayor s office and DDC called us on Sept. 11...I was there every day," Tully told AFP. "On the site we had at least three meetings a day with Ken 

[CTRL] JFK vs. The Federal Reserve

2002-09-03 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.friendsofliberty.com/



JFK vs. The Federal Reserve 
by Anthony Wayne
Lawgiver.org

On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 0, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business.

The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.

When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage - signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency - money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 0 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the united States of America.

United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 0 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 0 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:

1) war (Viet Nam); and,

2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 0 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.

---
Executive Order 0

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 

[CTRL] Israel Could Commit Terrorist Act in U.S. to Urge Iraq Strike

2002-09-03 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2002-09/03/article19.shtml



Israel Could Commit Terrorist Act in U.S. to Urge Iraq Strike: Baghdad

BAGHDAD, September 3 (IslamOnline  News Agencies) - Israel could commit a terrorist act in the United States and make it look like by Iraq to spur Washington into a military campaign on Baghdad, the Iraqi newspaper run by Saddam Hussein's eldest son, Uday, said Tuesday.

“With the U.S. administration having failed to find the slightest link between Iraq and the events of September 11, the Zionist entity could act by carrying out a terrorist act in the United States conforming to its desire to see Iraq attacked,” Babel paper warned, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported.

“The Zionist entity wants to involve the United States in an insane war from which it will benefit by settling its account with the Palestinian people and imposing its hegemony on the region,” the daily said.

Babel urged Arab states to realize the “inherent dangers to these plans” and to take “decisive steps” to defend their interests, AFP said.

The administration of U.S. President George W. Bush has repeatedly threatened to launch a military strike to topple Saddam Hussein's regime, which it accuses of harboring terrorists and developing weapons of mass destruction. Baghdad denies the charges which were not confirmed by any source.

The U.S. plans to attack Iraq to topple the Iraqi regime faced world opposition that increased in the Earth Summit held in Johannesburg.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Naji Sabri said while visiting Russia that the arms inspectors might return to Iraq if the UN sanctions crippling the Iraqi economy were lifted.

“First of all the sanctions which reduced the majority of Iraqi population to misery must be lifted. Respect for our country's national security is also important, as well as ensuring its sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Sabri said in an interview televised on Russia's ORT channel early Tuesday, AFP reported.

The White House reacted by saying it doubted Baghdad was sincere about the return of the UN inspectors.

The American Vice President, Dick Cheney has said weapons inspections cannot ensure Iraq has disarmed and Washington has no plans to abandon its policy to topple Saddam Hussein even if the inspectors are allowed back.

Meanwhile, a spokesman for Iraqi Air Defense Command said that the U.S. and British warplanes, supported by an AWACS, carried out on Sunday 34 sorties from bases in Kuwait, Iraqi News Agency (INA) reported.

“Iraqi missile force and anti-aircraft artillery drove the enemy planes back to their bases in Kuwait”, the spokesman added.

Since December 17, 1998 up to September 1, 2002, the U.S. and British warplanes carried out a total of 41998 sorties from Saudi, Kuwaiti and Turkish airspace, of which 15218 sorties from Kuwaiti airspace, INA said.

Meanwhile, the British Defense Ministry dismissed as speculation reports that the deployment to the Mediterranean of a 20,000-ton aircraft carrier, alongside warships from nine other nations, showed London was getting ready for war with Iraq






A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] 26 Reasons Why White Collar Terrorists Are To Blame for America's NewWar and

2002-09-03 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/apocalypse/26_reasons.html



26 Reasons Why "White Collar Terrorists" Are To Blame for "America's New War" and the Impending World War III


1) The "terrorist" attacks were completely predictable and, in fact, predicted. Forewarnings were issued by many patriotic and heroic individuals to government and military officials well in advance of Sept. 11, 2001. For instance, in August, Drs. Garth Nicolson, Ph.D., and his wife Nancy Nicolson, Ph.D., among the world's most esteemed Mycoplasma researchers and Gulf War Syndrome investigators, reported to Pentagon officials that they had confirmed intelligence that on Sept. 11, 2001 a terrorist strike against the Pentagon would be made. Their sources included individuals in key intelligence positions, the mob, and one high level African diplomat. Their "information was passed on to the Director of Policy of the Department of Defense, the Inspector General of the US Army Medical Corps and the National Security Council," Dr. Nicolson wrote. "Unfortunately, it was ignored." Likewise, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the award-winning author of the prophetically titled book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, (http://www.tetrahedron.org; http://www.prophecyandpreparedness.com) released three months before the attacks on Washington and New York, correctly predicted such a first strike on New York. For three years, based on government documents and intelligence reports, he had been warning "Metropolis" residents, "It's time to move."

2) On Friday, September 7, Florida Governor, Jeb Bush, brother to the President, issued an Executive Order in which members of the Florida National Guard were activated, "for the purpose of training to support law-enforcement personnel and emergency-management personnel in the event of civil disturbances or natural disaster." Perhaps the president and his brother received Dr. Nicolson's warnings or were the source of the warnings? 

3) Numerous reports have surfaced alleging that Bush administration, military, and intelligence officials’ close associates had suddenly, and inexplicably, sold all their airline stock just days before the terrorist attacks. The F.B.I. is reportedly investigating these reports and such “inside traders.” 

4) FEMA sent the Urban Search and Rescue Team to New York City THE NIGHT BEFORE the attacks occurred! One FEMA official, Mr. Tom Kennedy told Dan Rather on Sept 11, "We're currently one of the first teams that was deployed to support the City of New York in this disaster. We arrived on late Monday night [that is, on September 10, the NIGHT BEFORE] and went right into action on Tuesday morning." 

5) Osama bin Laden and his band of "Terrorists" could not have pulled off the "sophisticated" operation of four simultaneous air hijackings, and precision directed attacks, without the support of one or more "intelligence organizations." This was the expert testimony provided by past CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin Laden's American intelligence aficionado, Milt Bearden, interviewed by Dan Rather on September 12, 2001. In fact, when pressed by Dan Rather to endorse the theory of bin Laden's culpability, Mr. Bearden stated, "if they didn't have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one."

6) On October 31, 2001, the French daily Le Figaro reported that Osama bin Laden had met with a high-level CIA official in July 2000. At that time, bin Laden was already being sought for trial for his involvement in two U.S. embassy bombings and the U.S.S. Cole attack. The meeting was held in bin Laden's private suite in a Dubai hospital. Though he was eligible for extermination, according to President Bill Clinton's intelligence findings, on July 14th he was let go and left Dubai on his private jet. 

7) Every expert in the field of terrorism, up until Sept. 11, 2001, routinely explained the fact that certified terrorist organizations operate in an effort to garner worldwide attention and support for their political cause(s). In the case of pro-Palestinian terrorist organizations, their attacks had been traditionally against American military facilities and personnel. This was obviously neither the intent nor outcome of the attacks on the World Trade Center.

8) For weeks preceding September 11, 2001 international opinion regarding Israel and the United States had plummeted to an all-time low. Alternatively, pro-Palestinian attitudes had rapidly increased to an all-time high, particularly following the United Nations Conference on Racism wherein the U.S. and Israel had been chastised for their racist policies. Any intelligent pro-Palestinian terrorist group, such as Osama bin Laden's legions, or intelligence organization(s) supportive to the Palestinian cause, would not have jeopardized the significant gains achieved at that time.

9) Osama bin Laden took his direction and money from the CIA for ten years. During this time, approximately $5 billion was 

[CTRL] Fighting for Dignity - W$$D

2002-09-03 Thread aniMAL

-Caveat Lector-

Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002
From: earth shimmer
Subject: Fighting for Dignity

This is the second in a series of articles by independent media writer
Rodney Vlais, concerning non-corporatised perspectives on events stemming
from the World Summit for Sustainable Development.  The third article, to
come out over the next two days, will briefly summarise the outcomes of
the summit, and then outline alternative visions towards a better world
made by the diversity of people and communities who have gathered in
Johannesburg to breathe life into the sustainability debate.  Rodney can
be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FIGHTING FOR DIGNITY DESPITE THE WORLD SUMMIT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Rodney Vlais, 3rd September, 2002

It was a massive, pulsing sea of red.  Red headbands highlighted by
“Phanzsi NEPAD, phanzsi!” (“down to the New Partnerships for Africa’s
Development” – a neoliberal plan to entrench Africa more deeply in the
corporate-led global economy).  Red t-shirts by the Anti-Privatisation
Forum (APF), symbolised with a fist for justice emerging from the
continent of Africa.  Red t-shirts by the Landless Peoples Movement (LPM)
calling for land, food and jobs for the roughly one-half of South Africa’s
population who are landless.

The march, by far the larger and more radical of the two on August 31,
opposed the World Summit for Sustainable Development rather than trying to
influence it.  It lasted four hours in a winding route from the
impoverished township of Alexandra to Sandton where the summit is taking
place.

The contrast between the two areas makes it seem as though they belong to
separate universes, rather than being part of the same quadrant of
Johannesburg.  One dominated by tiny tin shacks separated by laneways only
a metre or two wide … the other with plush shopping malls, towering hotels
and luxury cars.  Despite its simplicity, this contrast made it difficult
not to join in on the shout “stop the war on the poor, make the rich pay!”

A collective of grass-roots movements organised the rally under the
umbrella of the Social Movements Indaba (SMI).  Including the APF, LPM,
Jubilee South Africa, the Rural Development Services Network and the
Environmental Justice Networking Forum, the collective split off from more
mainstream non-government organisations earlier this year in the process
of organizing the civil society presence at the WSSD (named the Global
Forum).  The SMI believed that the Global Forum was being co-opted by the
South African government, deciding to take a stance against the WSSD
rather than legitimizing what was seen as a means to only further
impoverish the poor to corporate rule.  As in Durban last year in
KwaZulu-Natal Province, when 20,000 protestors marched to delegitimise the
farce of the World Conference Against Racism, the rally demonstrated the
rising anger in South Africa that the end of apartheid has not seen better
conditions for the poor.

The rally was joined by hundreds of overseas activists representing a
diverse range of issues, from the protection of the rights of small-scale
fisherfolk to the survival of indigenous cultures.  Numerous banners
expressed disgust with corporate-led globalisation and with Washington’s
arrogance and imperialist outreach throughout the world.

While this international solidarity threaded through the long march that
stretched for at least a kilometre from front to end, it was largely a
rally for basic justice in South Africa.  Thousands of South Africans came
from numerous impoverished townships, complete with large banners against
water privatization, forced evictions, electricity cut-offs and
capitalism.  Young socialists danced and sung alongside grandmothers and
old men.  Cries of “Amandla!” (“power”) were belched over the
speakerphones from the two leading trucks, from which participants roared
in reply “Ngawethu!” (“to the people!”).

Despite being flanked by dozens of tanks, armoured personnel carriers and
thousands of rifle-carrying police, and buzzed by helicopters overhead,
the march saw no repeat of the police violence of the week before … where
candle-holding, singing demonstrators were met with concussion grenades
that injured three people.  Fortunately, the government reversed its
decision to refuse permission for the march, under pressure that such
refusal would resemble the apartheid era crackdowns on any signs of
dissent.

For the thousands of poor who took to the streets, little has indeed
changed since the 1994 elections that swept the ANC into power.  For part
of the long march I had the privilege to stride along aside Joyce, one of
many elderly women who participated.  Joyce ran out of food three days
ago, and survives on assistance from a non-government organization.  Her
son died of AIDS at the age of eight, when she was unable to afford the
anti-retroviral medication that could have prolonged his life.

“I’m here fighting for freedom.  We have no freedom now.  Things have
gotten worse since 

[CTRL] George W. - Master of Disguise

2002-09-03 Thread iNFoWaRZ

-Caveat Lector-

Conservatives are waking up to the fact that Bush is a flaming Liberal.
-

George W. - Master of Disguise
by Gary Benoit
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2002/09-09-2002/vo18no18_disguise.htm

Spouting patriotic rhetoric and enjoying the support of fellow Republicans, George W. 
Bush has masqueraded as a conservative while actually advancing a liberal agenda.

When Bill Clinton boasted that the era of big government is over, there were 
probably more belly laughs than nods. After all, Clinton was widely recognized as a 
big-spending liberal. He was seen by many as a dangerous demagogue with an insatiable 
appetite for power, an appetite that might have consumed our liberties if not for 
public and congressional resistance.

But with the election of supposed conservative George W. Bush, the public vigilance 
that helped keep Bill Clinton’s lust for power in check appears to have waned. Many 
Republicans and conservatives — who were quick to challenge President Clinton’s every 
power grab — fail to recognize the hypocrisy when President George W. Bush challenges 
Congress, as he did with a straight face during a radio address on August 17th, to 
show spending restraint lest the president enforce spending restraint. Promising 
that his administration will spend what is truly needed, and not a dollar more, Mr. 
Bush zeroed in on the Senate for ignoring fiscal discipline: I requested $2.4 
billion for public housing; the bill moving through the Senate includes $300 million 
more. I requested $2.2 billion for agricultural research; again, the Senate wants to 
spend $300 million more. But such statements beg the question: Why is George W. Bush 
requesting billions of dollars for unconstitutional welfare stat
e activities in the first place? How can an allegedly conservative president be so 
free with the taxpayers’ money?

Unfortunately, although Bush enjoys the reputation of a conservative, his own record 
shows that he is a liberal. In fact, his liberalism may be more dangerous than that of 
his immediate predecessor. Bill Clinton, a lifelong Democrat with a far-left pedigree, 
often provoked resistance from congressional Republicans and conservatives in general. 
Yet Republican congressmen who refused to support Clinton’s liberal policies have 
willingly supported similar policies when offered by fellow Republican George W. Bush. 
Consequently, Bush has been more effective than his predecessor, in many ways, in 
advancing Clintonian liberalism.

Bush’s Bloated Budget

A month after becoming president, Mr. Bush explained in a press conference (February 
22, 2001) that his budget would reduce the rate at which spending is increasing — but 
without cutting spending in the absolute sense. We’re going to slow the rate of 
growth of the budget down, he said at the time. It should come to [sic] no surprise 
to anybody that my budget is going to say loud and clear that the rate of growth of 
the budget, for example, from last year, was excessive. And so we’ll be slowing the 
rate of growth of the budget down.

Bush, in other words, didn’t promise to shrink the size of government, but merely to 
slow the rate of big-government expansion — to put the brakes on the car speeding 
towards the precipice, but not to stop it, much less change its direction. But in the 
end, Bush didn’t even put on the brakes, but hit the accelerator instead. In the 
budget he submitted in April 2001, Bush proposed spending $1,961 billion in fiscal 
2002 as compared to an estimated $1,856 billion in 2001 — a 5.7 percent increase. 
That, of course, was before September 11th. In a midterm budget summary released in 
July, the Bush administration estimated fiscal 2002 spending at a whopping $2,032 
billion as compared to actual fiscal 2001 spending of $1,864 — a nine percent 
increase. The July budget document also proposed spending $2,138 billion in fiscal 
2003, a 5.2 percent increase over 2002. During the Clinton presidency, the rate of 
increase in the federal budget from one year to the next never exceeded 5.1 percent (1
999 to 2000), and it was as low as 2.6 percent (1996 to 1997). The bottom line: 
Federal spending is increasing at a faster rate with George W. Bush in the White House 
than it did with Bill Clinton in the White House.

Presidential bookends: Publication of these two presidential portraits prompted very 
different reader reactions. While the January 18, 1999 cover shot of Bill Clinton 
didn’t raise a stir, some Republican readers expressed outrage over the nearly 
identical picture of President Bush featured on the August 13, 2001 issue. But the 
similarities between the Clinton and George W. Bush presidencies are much more than 
skin deep.

Other budget trends also make the Clinton era appear more fiscally conservative by 
comparison. When Clinton was president, the annual budget deficits as calculated by 
the federal government became successively smaller and were eventually replaced 

[CTRL] Fwd: [GATA] Sinclair and Schultz on why the gold cartel can't stop a bull market

2002-09-03 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

Why the Gold Cartel Will Fail
to Prevent a Primary Bull Market in Gold
-- and the Real Reason They're
Trying to Prevent It Anyway

By James Sinclair
and Harry Schultz
September 3, 2002

1. J.P. Morgan/Chase appears to be, by
accident or intention, the main member of the
gold dealers' short seller's club.

2. In our opinion central banks have given
JPM lease agreements whereby JPM receives
physical bullion by paying three-quarters of
a percent annual interest. JPM and/or its
clients are free to use or sell this gold
however they want. JPM or its clients appear
to have used this gold to sell violently at
key technical  points -- $312.50 to $314.80
(today) and $315 and $329.50-$330, thereby
depressing the gold price.

3. Moody's credit rating service recently
downgraded Morgan/Chase. Then Standard 
Poor's rating service downgraded Morgan/Chase
based on specific derivative positions.

4. The total derivative positions of
Morgan/Chase can be found at the U.S. Office
of the Controller of the Currency. The
Controller of the Currency reports to the
International Monetary Fund, which shares its
data with the Bank for International
Settlements.

5. So the positions carried by Morgan/Chase
are public, but the public has no real idea
on where to find the data.

6. The total of all derivatives on the books
of Morgan/Chase on all underlying assets is
$74 trillion. Yes, $74 trillion.

7. The size of the gold derivatives on
Morgans/Chase's books is $46 billion to $60
billion, depending on valuation methods.
Yes, $46 billion to $60 billion.

8. All gold derivative dealers use risk-
control programs to manage their gold
positions. These programs maintain the risk
of the gold derivative to the dealers at the
degree chosen by the trading management at
the inception of the transactions.

9. All the gold derivatives on the books of
Morgan/Chase are short spreads -- short of
gold. If they were not short spreads,
Morgan/Chase would be extraordinarily PLEASED
by the rise in the gold price and bullish
about gold.

10. The total of the international position
of short spread gold derivatives is $300
billion, according to IMF and BIS reports. If
you convert $300 billion into ounces of gold
at the present price, you get more than 900
million ounces.

11. When the gold price hit $305, it
triggered the risk-control programs of gold
dealers to buy gold to maintain the risk
exposure of the gold derivative short spreads
for the dealer cabal/cartel, of which, in our
opinion, Morgan/Chase is the major if not the
main player. As gold, with the help of the
cartel, dropped from the high $320s, the
risk-control programs triggered selling of
gold for the same reason. At $302-$305, risk-
control programs returned to neutral. Now
you can clearly understand the action of the
gold market.

12. If gold closes above $330, the risk-
control programs of gold dealers will start
to demand that for each ounce of gold sold
short in the short gold spreads, the dealers
must own long about .623 ounces of gold.

13. At a gold price close at/or above $354,
the gold dealer cartel's risk-control
programs will call for approximately .986
ounces of gold long for each ounce short on
the gold derivative short spreads.

14. That would be practically a 1-to-1 ratio,
one ounce short to one ounce long required to
maintain solvency under risk-control programs
at $354 gold.

15. The demand in gold ounces that would be
created among commercial banks, gold banks,
and gold dealers under risk-control programs
by a gold price at or above $354 would be
about 886,325,000 ounces. That number exceeds
all the gold that all the central banks have,
including all the gold they 

[CTRL] Fwd: [corp-focus] Thirsty for Justice

2002-09-03 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

Thirsty for Justice
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Shown the folly of over-reliance on markets even in the world's richest
country, the market fundamentalists at the World Bank are continuing
their push for privatization of services -- with the provision of
drinking water at the top of the list -- in the developing world.

Water works plagued by poor service and underinvestment can be
rejuvenated by private water operators. That according to the World
Bank, a compromised consulting industry and the private water industry
-- dominated by the French firms Suez and Vivendi -- itself.

But citizen movements across the planet are rising to challenge the
World Bank and corporate schemes to wrest control of now-public water
systems. Perhaps the hottest flashpoint in the conflict between the
people and the Water Barons is in Ghana. There, the National Coalition
Against the Privatization of Water (NCAP of Water) is aggressively
opposing a Bank-advocated privatization scheme that would lease out the
country's urban water systems for a song. The scheme was hatched in
1995, and may be implemented next year, unless NCAP can thwart it.

(A newly released International Fact-Finding Mission assessment of the
Ghanaian privatization proposal is available at: 
http://www.citizen.org/documents/factfindingmissionGhana.pdf)

To make the system generate enough revenue to pay the operator -- a
handful of international operators, including Suez and Vivendi, are in
the running to take over the system -- the privatization scheme would
require persistent rate hikes. The goal is to achieve cost recovery --
tariff revenue sufficient to meet operations and maintenance costs,
without any public subsidy to keep prices in check. This, even though
systems in the United States, among other industrialized countries,
routinely rely on support from general tax revenues.

Compounding the rate hikes, the privatization scheme calls for the
inclusion of an automatic tariff adjustment -- with rates rising
automatically to offset inflation and, most importantly, currency
devaluations. That makes sense from the viewpoint of the foreign
operator -- they will want to maintain constant profits in
dollar-denominated terms, not in cedis, the local currency. But it is a
disaster from the point of view of Ghanaian consumers -- their cedi
income does not go up just because the value of the cedi declines.
Assuming future devaluations, Ghanaian consumers will find themselves
paying a higher and higher proportion of their income to the water company.

In exchange for certain, ongoing rate hikes into the indefinite future,
Ghana is supposed to benefit from a more reliable and efficient system,
and from expansion of the piped water system to reach the millions of
urban consumers who are not connected to water pipes. But almost all of
the evidence suggests these promises will turn out to be illusions or deceptions.

First, the record of private water company operation in developing
countries is very poor. There is little to suggest that private
companies deliver efficiencies in this area, though they are clearly
skilled at extracting enormous profits.

The details of the Ghanaian privatization plans offer little comfort
that things will be different in this case.

There are some incentives built in the proposal to increase the amount
of water delivered -- many lower income Ghanaians may get water from
pipes only once every two or four weeks -- but the proposed leasing
terms would encourage the private operator to improve service for
high-volume richer consumers, rather than low-volume poorer ones.

Achievement of water delivery and other