Re: trying to understand assemble option in mdadm please help.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote: On 16/07/12 08:12 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: apart from my question i know what does assemble mean but most of the time it create conflict with the option add. for example. if raid is broken then i can just re-add the the broken partition if my HD fails then i will add the new drive, recreate the partition and add it to new array and cat /proc/mdstat will show me the sync status. but now the next question coming in my mind is why assemble. i also observed that some time when i restart the computer contain RAID1 after 2 or 3 months it start to test or (maybe)assemble one of the partition by saying that (more or less) that the raid has not been tested for this this days so now reassembling (sorry if i am wrong since i can not recall the whole message) so the point why assemble is necessary? if assembling is that necessary then why should i wait to restart. i can do this manually every week or can schedule a task for it. Thanks, Assemble builds the arrays based on the information contained in the superblock. The testing you are talking about is more likely fsck checking the file system(s) on the arrays. if Assemble builds the array then what is the purpose of --create option. sorry if my question is a bit annoying but i am confuse in this. is there a difference in creating and building the array? Thanks, It is possible for arrays to get out of sync due to a power outage or improper shutdown but in practice this is unlikely. Nonetheless, mdadm should also check for the consistency of the arrays periodically. If it doesn't do this and a drive fails, it may not be possible to rebuild the array. The /etc/crontab.d folder on my Wheezy system contains an mdadm entry which was put there by the package maintainer or developer. It includes the line: 57 0 * * 0 root if [ -x /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray ] [ $(date +\%d) -le 7 ]; then /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray --cron --all --idle --quiet; fi which checks all the arrays once a month. This is a trade off since you don't want to spend too much time checking arrays. If possible, you may want to run checkarray before your drive has failed to ensure that your array is consistent before pulling the failing drive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50041992.7020...@rogers.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkf4zxrojv5j+lhgcodh7grbqqgq745a8gyo+a60ss...@mail.gmail.com
Re: trying to understand assemble option in mdadm please help.
or just one thing if you please explain these commands. i think my confusion will be cleared mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/hda1 mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 /dev/hda3 mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdb1 mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hdb3 what is the difference in both command thanks. any help will be highly appreciated. On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote: On 16/07/12 08:12 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: apart from my question i know what does assemble mean but most of the time it create conflict with the option add. for example. if raid is broken then i can just re-add the the broken partition if my HD fails then i will add the new drive, recreate the partition and add it to new array and cat /proc/mdstat will show me the sync status. but now the next question coming in my mind is why assemble. i also observed that some time when i restart the computer contain RAID1 after 2 or 3 months it start to test or (maybe)assemble one of the partition by saying that (more or less) that the raid has not been tested for this this days so now reassembling (sorry if i am wrong since i can not recall the whole message) so the point why assemble is necessary? if assembling is that necessary then why should i wait to restart. i can do this manually every week or can schedule a task for it. Thanks, Assemble builds the arrays based on the information contained in the superblock. The testing you are talking about is more likely fsck checking the file system(s) on the arrays. if Assemble builds the array then what is the purpose of --create option. sorry if my question is a bit annoying but i am confuse in this. is there a difference in creating and building the array? Thanks, It is possible for arrays to get out of sync due to a power outage or improper shutdown but in practice this is unlikely. Nonetheless, mdadm should also check for the consistency of the arrays periodically. If it doesn't do this and a drive fails, it may not be possible to rebuild the array. The /etc/crontab.d folder on my Wheezy system contains an mdadm entry which was put there by the package maintainer or developer. It includes the line: 57 0 * * 0 root if [ -x /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray ] [ $(date +\%d) -le 7 ]; then /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray --cron --all --idle --quiet; fi which checks all the arrays once a month. This is a trade off since you don't want to spend too much time checking arrays. If possible, you may want to run checkarray before your drive has failed to ensure that your array is consistent before pulling the failing drive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50041992.7020...@rogers.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmhtdfr04zjjig+jxnpahqsbpt844cb-kgyw0_1mqf...@mail.gmail.com
Re: trying to understand assemble option in mdadm please help.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote: On 17/07/12 03:48 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: or just one thing if you please explain these commands. i think my confusion will be cleared mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/hda1 mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 /dev/hda3 mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdb1 mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hdb3 what is the difference in both command thanks. any help will be highly appreciated. The first set of commands should give you error messages unless the disk devices are actually part of the array. Assemble normally doesn't need to know the disk partitions that form the array, but you can list them. This could be done if the superblocks were damaged, for example. You need to get the order right in that case or the device may not be readable. The normal command would be just mdadm --assemble /dev/md1. The alternative would be to relist all the constituent devices. The second set of commands should give you error messages if the disk devices are already part of the array. Add puts a new drive into the array. The drive will be assumed to be dirty and a re-syncing operation will commence. just one last question what do you mean by build. do you mean the sync which shows in cat /proc/mdstat and show the sync status b/w the two partition. does this called build? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5005c43a.4090...@rogers.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk+5t7d7o0k25somngbk5a6pgdhi6rokgguud1jamm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: trying to understand assemble option in mdadm please help.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote: Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: Gary Dale wrote: Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: or just one thing if you please explain these commands. i think my confusion will be cleared mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/hda1 mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 /dev/hda3 The first set of commands should give you error messages unless the disk devices are actually part of the array. Assemble normally doesn't need to know the disk partitions that form the array, but you can list them. This could be done if the superblocks were damaged, for example. You need to get the order right in that case or the device may not be readable. The first command assembles an array using only one of the devices. This emits a degraded array of only one of the two mirrored devices. This is useful in specialized instances. It isn't the typical thing to do. It is sometimes useful to create a degraded array with one disk now and then later add a second disk. This appears to be what you are doing across the two sets of commands. If you assemble an array with only one disk then there is no redundancy. If you assemble an array with only one disk then the array will be marked degraded and later when a second disk is added then the array must be sync'd in order to bring it into normal operation. That sync'ing process may take a long time. The normal command would be just mdadm --assemble /dev/md1. The alternative would be to relist all the constituent devices. Agreed. Assembling the array with a single disk into a degraded mode isn't typical. But it is useful for recovery data from a failed disk on a second system used for data recovery. mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdb1 mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hdb3 what is the difference in both command thanks. any help will be highly appreciated. The second set of commands should give you error messages if the disk devices are already part of the array. Add puts a new drive into the array. The drive will be assumed to be dirty and a re-syncing operation will commence. Yes. But by the combination of the two sets of commands: mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/hda1 mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 /dev/hda3 mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdb1 mdadm --add /dev/md3 /dev/hdb3 That appears to be a less efficient way of doing this: mdadm --assemble /dev/md1 /dev/hda1 /dev/hdb1 mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 /dev/hda3 /dev/hdb3 If you have two disks that you are trying to assemble into a RAID1 mirror then you should assemble both devices together at once so that the raid array may remain in sync. Let me guess... If you are recovering a single disk from a two disk mirror but with one disk failed onto a second machine then (and pretty much only then, no other time) would the combination of commands make sense to me. just one last question what do you mean by build. do you mean the sync which shows in cat /proc/mdstat and show the sync status b/w the two partition. does this called build? I went looking for that build you referenced: Gary Dale wrote in a previous message: Assemble builds the arrays based on the information contained in the superblock. Build and assemble are very similar in meaning in that context. An array must first be created. After an array has been created then at future system boot times it will only be assembled (or built) and not created again. Create zeros data and starts a clean empty block of data with any previous data destroyed. Assemble or build does not destroy data but activates an existing array with existing data and makes the existing data available. Bob Thanks you :) Bob and Gary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=wwh2_uojxte2smra8ulfqtfmuhbfbptmdmu_omkk...@mail.gmail.com
pam authentication issue
i am using a kvm-qemu proxmox front end as GUI. recently i installed ocsinventory-agent packege to update my inventory server my base machine successfully sent the inventory but now when i try to login to gui it browser refuse and give me an error You could not be logged on. Make sure your user name and password are correct, and then try again i am getting this log in the error uID 17378 DateToday 16:30:02 Hostlion Messagetype Syslog FacilitySECURITY SeverityERR Syslogtag lion Checksum0 Message worker: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /lib/libnsl.so.1: symbol __libc_clntudp_bufcreate, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference uID 17376 DateToday 16:19:34 Hostlion Messagetype Syslog FacilitySECURITY SeverityERR Syslogtag lion Checksum0 Message worker: PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_unix.so here is the version detail of specified module in the log. (i think old version has been replaced with new and the base machine has lost the authentication specifications) problem machine (where ocs agent packege has been installed) - # dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i386 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: 32-bit shared libraries for AMD64 old machine 1 ( haven't installed ocs agent and working fine) dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i3862.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM old machine 2 (haven't installed ocs agent and working fine) -- dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.13-27 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i3862.13-27 Embedded GNU C Library: 32-bit shared librar Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkeaclpwdo-dtzej5x8lmdyrp6cne2vuh9xzt_ohwa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: pam authentication issue
i am trying to scan google for the solution for the said error since morning and i learn that this error is a bug and the issue has been occurred because the new version of library has replace the old one. and now i can not sort out which file could be replaced and how :( any advice / recommendation /suggestion would be highly appreciated. Thanks, On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i am using a kvm-qemu proxmox front end as GUI. recently i installed ocsinventory-agent packege to update my inventory server my base machine successfully sent the inventory but now when i try to login to gui it browser refuse and give me an error You could not be logged on. Make sure your user name and password are correct, and then try again i am getting this log in the error uID 17378 DateToday 16:30:02 Hostlion Messagetype Syslog FacilitySECURITY SeverityERR Syslogtag lion Checksum0 Message worker: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /lib/libnsl.so.1: symbol __libc_clntudp_bufcreate, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference uID 17376 DateToday 16:19:34 Hostlion Messagetype Syslog FacilitySECURITY SeverityERR Syslogtag lion Checksum0 Message worker: PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_unix.so here is the version detail of specified module in the log. (i think old version has been replaced with new and the base machine has lost the authentication specifications) problem machine (where ocs agent packege has been installed) - # dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i386 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: 32-bit shared libraries for AMD64 old machine 1 ( haven't installed ocs agent and working fine) dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i3862.7-18lenny7 GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM old machine 2 (haven't installed ocs agent and working fine) -- dpkg -l | grep libc6 ii libc6 2.13-27 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i3862.13-27 Embedded GNU C Library: 32-bit shared librar Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmnddt650eehkac1vy_ellhs78kq89hzvyx2t1pd5e1...@mail.gmail.com
LVM creation methods
i was reading a document where a person has configured physical volume and didn't use fdisk he just directly created the partition by pvcreate /dev/sda and there are some documents which shows the utilization of fdisk and converting sda1 to 8e type which is LVM. so the question is what is the difference b/w creating it directly on disk by pvcreate command and by using fdisk. actually i have just created the partition via direct command pvcreate /dev/sda it is fully functionally and i can use it as a partition but when i fdisk -l /dev/sda it shows that the disk is empty. so i am worried that is it the proper way to do it or else i may not end up with consequences. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMme=r7mxbqpcujp7xtn-3uxzpurd5fnh6cvouxn1nx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: LVM creation methods
thanks it is very clear, yes, i am using the second disk just for storage purpose. so i am not worried about the booting since it is already been handled via /dev/sdb so no issues for me. Thanks both Meike and Darac On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:35:03PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i was reading a document where a person has configured physical volume and didn't use fdisk he just directly created the partition by pvcreate /dev/sda and there are some documents which shows the utilization of fdisk and converting sda1 to 8e type which is LVM. so the question is what is the difference b/w creating it directly on disk by pvcreate command and by using fdisk. With one, you're using the whole disk, with the other, you're using a portion of the disk. If you want to use the disk with non-LVM-aware operating systems, then you'll need to partition the disk and give them a partition. Bear in mind that non-LVM-aware probably includes your BIOS, too, so a whole-disk PV is unbootable. That said, if you only want to use that disk for LVM, then there is no issue with using the whole disk. In fact, for Advanced Format disks and SSDs, it may be preferable as you're more likely to get the alignment right on them. actually i have just created the partition via direct command pvcreate /dev/sda it is fully functionally and i can use it as a partition but when i fdisk -l /dev/sda it shows that the disk is empty. so i am worried that is it the proper way to do it or else i may not end up with consequences. fdisk only reads (as far as I'm aware) PC-style partition tables. If it says the disk is empty, what it's saying is that there's no partition table there. If you had a GPT on there, you'd likely get the same message (actually, newer versions DO detect GPT and print a complaint). Use the right tools for the job. If you have a partition table, read it with fdisk. If you have a PV on there, use LVM tools. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQCVTMAAoJEKB7YbRsd8TGWPsP/2/mEFndeci7aOlwSEgnrv/e mL1f5431IuH8g78BVP/DYDrRfDt5OJqqmPdMIuteZKdfA9QcmciOgyfrlpqnh0l1 fgQbbJDgItHoHOpYiCowAXvn2qFZM/s+1NHW4qBxLSn2A2jQTOfC58dg47ML5FC5 UsrtiN3h7Mo5DKnHG61m9VZUTt0KtplQbDp9mT2oOhJf8pk2mYmI9b7+tYh/NBSY erg0X5lxeBp7D7hHmfr25fbYP5++2r7jZ7oPKx9j42+X9vT4zZ+XH/2wVA1QaEBY XeswtEQ9wayzyzwuTAk85kijAy2xY0QYCMdVEH5G420D8gOx+pUCiZ7G4RUPby05 /6fPXMunkkADlHSszhJNRJ+0vaTSwUUXKU41+lVY1ipMAXhNjAib7IitDV9EBVwY corv0kheqG+p765InbCSR3l/IGl5ExyPNd93twp2k2F+xDqDl8ybY02A9ruyMHxD BrtCuGTMkY6pPzFijddbzC6vFhZKnfUlSXzaChUg8MrDGImWYbvZGX9n4ldQA3za o4EyJ1siqOwpwqZ8FPVMr3SHSz0Rc+YnTv96lyP2jgBfHoKz/uj9pMBzd+zqut7g C6pfYACDutg/NtPPDm09ZyRedjf8mV/LMPifw5/ZGbEmYlHD+8Adh1/dt0gcFVmC hBGBAsR1hnSHAmJTkLkS =esrX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=837eaexrp5npxmdgs0o-jzlac4jfszf91yn66mng...@mail.gmail.com
mail server
need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like postfix, sandmail etc out there. here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable, web base console etc. btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think debian is not natively supporting it. any help would be appreciable. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk21bvtuvzbxgzvtjgpu-1tscegl-uzgluuupktban...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:21 PM, ew e...@carry-her.com wrote: On Jul 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like postfix, sandmail etc out there. here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable, web base console etc. btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think debian is not natively supporting it. any help would be appreciable. Thanks, For a simple feature rich mail server check out citadel. There are packages in Debian. I will easily meet all your needs. It is lighter weight compared to Zimbra with many of the same features. I'm able to run Citadel on a very modest VPS (384MB RAM) along with several hosted websites/email domains. what is the perpuse of this package are you using it for local office or as a service provider? for how many users you are using this package. if VPS then how you cater the security issues. like open smtp relay. spam control and other security related matters. Good Luck, Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk21bvtuvzbxgzvtjgpu-1tscegl-uzgluuupktban...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f1ff7563-ec35-4888-b0b9-b8555ca83...@carry-her.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmm7+-gu3lqcvcnbkb1sl633fh8qz9rxckmg7w3ynrj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Denis Witt denis.w...@concepts-and-training.de wrote: On 25.07.2012 13:52, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable, web base console etc. btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think debian is not natively supporting it. Hi, you will need at least two things, an SMTP Server (like postfix) and an IMAP/POP3 Server (like dovecot). Over the years I have used many different programs for that, starting with Exim. But now I always use Postfix and Dovecot together with LDAP, Amavis (Spamassassin, ClamAV) and Postgrey. Dovecot is quite easy to set up. Postfix might be a bit trickier, but it is very well documented (and the mailing list is very responsive). Anyway, regardless which server you will choose, please do a lot of research before you launch the server for public use. It is rather easy to set up an open relay anybody could use for sending SPAM. Your IP will be show up on Blacklists and you will have a lot of trouble removing them from those lists. Also it is important not to use a dailup IP, instead you will need a proper static IP with correct rDNS settings. If you don't have that in your office you will have to use a relay server to send mails (external). Thanks for letting me know these matters but i am not using it publicly i will be downloading my emails from my hosted mail server. To have a web based access to your mails I would recommend roundcube. Which is very easy to set up and not too bloated so your users will be fine with that very quickly. If you want a web based console for all the Admin stuff you can use webmin, but usually there is no need for that once the server is up and running. The advance setting up your mail server by hand is that you will get a deeper understanding of what happens in case of problems. Zimbra is more like a black box doing some magic stuff inside. (As fas as I know Zimbra is based on Postfix.) Zimbra is also much more than just an Mailserver, it's more like a collaboration tool like Microsoft Exchange/Outlook. Bye. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/500fe8a9.5000...@concepts-and-training.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnCnU=J=7t2XNdePF9LZG=jq7pdkdphdmvq0dxnwef...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:25 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like postfix, sandmail etc out there. here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable, web base console etc. btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think debian is not natively supporting it. Ugh... I would avoid Zimbra as much as I can (nothing against it, is just I don't like all-in-one solutions for mail services I prefer small pieces of software performing a brilliantly work) :-) any help would be appreciable. My ingredients for the recipe: - Fetchmail (or getmail) for polling e-mails form your remote provider - Postfix (for local/remote lmtp/smtp services) - Cyrus (for local/remote pop/imap services) - Spamassassin (anti-spam) - ClamAV (antivirus if using windows stations) - Amavisd-new (I call it the glue because I use it to join all the pieces) I have no webmail (forbidden), e-mail users are stored in a separate database (sasl2db) and are not system users which means no login shell. how you perform basic tasks like mail-ques checking, logs, mail box create, delete, mail restriction .etc.? This setup has been serving me very well during many years and is very flexible and powerful (though not easy to setup) because as it can be expanded to support more users and a different user database backend (e.g., SQL, PAM...). Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jup1ga$ot7$9...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMm7nAeuGsBmeUWcRtcKKnb=Y8Xan1PPt=nvgpyulkm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:20 AM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:58:39 +0800 Umarzuki Mochlis umarz...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/7/25 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com: need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like postfix, sandmail etc out there. here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my office too. secure, stable, web base console etc. btw, i have heard that there is a mailserver called zimbra. but i think debian is not natively supporting it. any help would be appreciable. check iredmail. Easy to install. zimbra mail server ispmail server I wouldn't run zimbra unless you have pretty powerful hardware. I ran zimbra on a p4 with 1.5gb of ram and was rebooting it weekly. The java processes would deplete memory in that time. I have since replaced it with a much lighter vm running postfix + dovecot (imap/pop server) + roundcube (webmail). --b is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools -postfidx -dovecot -postfixadmin (web interface) -roundcube -spamassassin -clamv btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why we have to add several other tools like mentioned above (dovecot,spamassassin etc) ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakmzw+btd1noagkdi30mhrns2cypamrgcugap8ggeqmsz9n...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=3-994=ybp1tbhvk3zy7qb3pjna34y_jvgc+nk25l...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux. there is lot to learn. but your individual help i have learn alot. Thanks, On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: -postfidx -dovecot -postfixadmin (web interface) -roundcube -spamassassin -clamv btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why we have to add several other tools like mentioned above (dovecot,spamassassin etc) ? Postfix (and sendmail and it's ilk) are actually known as Mail Tranport Agents (MTAs). They are responsible for getting the mail from point A to point B. The other pieces are responsible for routing the mail locally (the mail user agent -- MUA), classifying and eliminating SPAM, etc. Think of the MTA as the airport. The MTA's responsibility is only to get you from one airport to the other, you (or the MUA) are responsible for getting from home (composing the message) to the originating airport, and from the destination airport to your final destination. Make more sense? --b -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMn9OzFBpwrOByvFqiAaB6Sy0aOL97H-KcfWLbpKkh=e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: -postfidx -dovecot -postfixadmin (web interface) -roundcube -spamassassin -clamv btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why we have to add several other tools like mentioned above (dovecot,spamassassin etc) ? Postfix (and sendmail and it's ilk) are actually known as Mail Tranport Agents (MTAs). They are responsible for getting the mail from point A to point B. The other pieces are responsible for routing the mail locally (the mail user agent -- MUA), classifying and eliminating SPAM, etc. Think of the MTA as the airport. The MTA's responsibility is only to get you from one airport to the other, you (or the MUA) are responsible for getting from home (composing the message) to the originating airport, and from the destination airport to your final destination. Make more sense? thanks, good example. if i say ISPs which provide SMTP relay. are using MTA where they dont want to store emails (unlike i have to do in office) rather just relay all the messages to destination. Correct? --b -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmRjY6spQCK3j_6GmQNXKPTztc9gB=9sjcsucoypbn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux. there is lot to learn. I first switched -time ago- from MDaemon (v3.2) when I installed a Linux system and had to select a good replacement for it. Hint: write down in a paper what's your current mail system data flow (user's mailboxes, incoming/outgoing messages, filter needings, anti-spam/ malware needings, local/remote connections...), what are your current requirements and what are the tasks that MDaemon is doing right now. This will help you to get the big picture for a better understanding. sorry i think i explain a bit wrong. i was using Mdeamon in my last company my current company is fetching emails from mail server from our service provider. since we fetch the email via pop and sent via smtp the problem is i need to make backup of individual PST. therefore i presented the idea to management for IMAP. so i think my basic need are. POP emails from hosted server. IMAP for local users, ldap for AddressBook/contents update. spam filter and antivirus scan. and obviously Web access for clients. and i dont know if SQL database is better then local mail folders. because mdeamon use to store data in a folder. but i think SQL is much more better then that. Zimbra can be seen as a tool more in the line of what MDaemon is (an all in one solution providing pop3/imap/smtp/webmail/AV/filtering/ multipop...) but that can be an advantage only for the first days when you setup but as time passes, it will reveal that using separate tools for each task has more benefits that relying in just one service for the mail system. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jv0qp9$108$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmvbh2ex5jdxuxce9j6xhdxnnpfcwhpn9feyonhpey...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:52:48 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when ever some one say a name mail server unintentionally mailer daemon comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux. there is lot to learn. I first switched -time ago- from MDaemon (v3.2) when I installed a Linux system and had to select a good replacement for it. Hint: write down in a paper what's your current mail system data flow (user's mailboxes, incoming/outgoing messages, filter needings, anti-spam/ malware needings, local/remote connections...), what are your current requirements and what are the tasks that MDaemon is doing right now. This will help you to get the big picture for a better understanding. sorry i think i explain a bit wrong. i was using Mdeamon in my last company my current company is fetching emails from mail server from our service provider. Ah, okay :-) since we fetch the email via pop and sent via smtp the problem is i need to make backup of individual PST. What? I don't get this... you mean you need to migrate the e-mails and other stuff from Outlook clients to the new e-mailing service? ok our 20 users fetching their emails from our hosted server. which is maintained by our service provider. and we are keeping 3 months of emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can not recover it since we have no backup. so my proposal to my management is if we place a centralized mail server we can make backup of users email from our mail server and old mail can also be restored. you can call it migrating or shifting :). but the purpose of the whole idea is to backup all emails and to provide more options to the users like web access and our users will be independent from our service provider and will be coordinating directly with me in any problem.. therefore i presented the idea to management for IMAP. Well, yes, IMAP is good for migrating messages but can be slow if there are thousand messages to move or copy and/or if the IMAP server is accessed over Internet (I mean, not locally). so i think my basic need are. POP emails from hosted server. If you mean to fecth POP e-mails from your server to place them in your own server, Fetchmail or Getmail can do the jobs as I already told you. Once the messages are in your server, they can be accessed locally via POP, IMAP or directly put into the user's home. IMAP for local users, Good. ldap for AddressBook/contents update. OpenLDAP can hold this but it can take you some time to configure it. For a bunch of users maybe you should reconsider it. spam filter and antivirus scan. Antispam is necessary, the AV only when supporting windows clients. and obviously Web access for clients. Then you have to add a web server and a webmail service :-) and i dont know if SQL database is better then local mail folders. because mdeamon use to store data in a folder. but i think SQL is much more better then that. A SQL datadase for storing 20 users is a bit overwhelming, IMO. It will require an extra component (MySQL, PostgresSQL or SQLite) and the benefit of having a database for that small amount of users can be unnoticed. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jv3eni$vb5$5...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmnpebjy4dj1_gyn77+sb+1bbg6dtqjngmnhl7ywnxo...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mail server
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:21:53 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: (...) since we fetch the email via pop and sent via smtp the problem is i need to make backup of individual PST. What? I don't get this... you mean you need to migrate the e-mails and other stuff from Outlook clients to the new e-mailing service? ok our 20 users fetching their emails from our hosted server. which is maintained by our service provider. and we are keeping 3 months of emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can not recover it since we have no backup. so my proposal to my management is if we place a centralized mail server we can make backup of users email from our mail server and old mail can also be restored. you can call it migrating or shifting :). but the purpose of the whole idea is to backup all emails and to provide more options to the users like web access and our users will be independent from our service provider and will be coordinating directly with me in any problem.. Then I guess the recipe I provided before it suits your needs. To migrate the current messages to your new-owned system you can use a dummy IMAP account to copy/paste (or simply move) the e-mails between the remote server and your which will work regardless the MUA in use. Once all of the accounts are created in your own e-mail server and working you can start polling the new messages from your remote server using fetchmail/getmail and configure your users e-mail clients to contact your e-mail server (via imap/pop3) instead your hosted one. Thanks, its been very helpful. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jv67f3$ltk$7...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk0fry6hcphxb+76sokke0o0amcsuddcdjwyogszy3...@mail.gmail.com
MS office communication server substitute in linux
is there any substitute of office communication server in Linux for inter office communication, voice, video, chat file transfer (support centralized environment not just work on broadcast for e.g unlike outlook messanger). Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkq9u-u-zhdeslj6zis0xhl79jajyp8lv5u-mwv4pa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian showing less RAM
i was using i686 kernel now i just updated amd64 it worked aptitude install linux-image-2.6-amd64 root@lion:~# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 8134920 833728051548 0 2272 17392 -/+ buffers/cache: 637088071212 Swap: 15623088 0 15623088 but my second question about disk space is still a confusiong. please help On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i am using debian 6.0.4. i have 8GB of ram installed in a server 2GB x 4. bios also shows 8 GB. however top only shows 2gb or RAM top - 15:48:29 up 16 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 Tasks: 90 total, 1 running, 89 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.6%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2273280k total,79768k used, 2193512k free, 2292k buffers Swap: 15623088k total,0k used, 15623088k free,45456k cached root@lion:~# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 2273280 797682193512 0 2292 45456 -/+ buffers/cache: 320202241260 Swap: 15623088 0 15623088 Secondly. root@lion:~# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/pve--vg-root 442G 550M 419G 1% / i dont know if its normal but things are confusing me a bit. i have working space of 442G used 550MB and available 419MB there almost 22GB is missing. please help. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmm_pvwxn9ddsq3vvbs9vsmtu96kjnfgejkpicsob_k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian showing less RAM
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:52:49PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am using debian 6.0.4. i have 8GB of ram installed in a server 2GB x 4. bios also shows 8 GB. however top only shows 2gb or RAM top - 15:48:29 up 16 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 Tasks: 90 total, 1 running, 89 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.6%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2273280k total,79768k used, 2193512k free, 2292k buffers Swap: 15623088k total,0k used, 15623088k free,45456k cached What kernel are you using? Either you have one that isn't enable to see the extra ram or, as has happened on the list in the past, you have bad modules :) Thanks ... kernel was the problem. Secondly. root@lion:~# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/pve--vg-root 442G 550M 419G 1% / i dont know if its normal but things are confusing me a bit. i have working space of 442G used 550MB and available 419MB there almost 22GB is missing. 5% of 442GB = 22.2GB. So that's your reserved portion. can i recover this reserved portion ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQIlgVAAoJEKB7YbRsd8TGcBAP/17JL7wT8QwVrW/r3WjNtTkY y89URwZ7F07PUIYjlXr0QvbR6Xc9Qonesm05IYuKkrCcZsi952/6sRLxsNcEESzP PyodN+nWBYulIHoWOVAHiFvlGrhXrpRB5YyTjpyFs/3U5nAF0F3+kh46S0HeWBYp tf+1hyuFjGvE4erUBZfvLr11bDzjEnweKujk8wMCvCPrIBODxti65bYhrb2J6qYH a5VNFw9BG8446huJPuR4jxqZQMA7J2iPDArpfNWx3W1DDSIbrjAFJb+TX7XiNC+0 xwVzsFHk4UkG3bLXcaLFmL0m4KJonXljPIC0Ngupq9YfjKHCVA8kC7GlquWh844f AOEDuNSPvs7re6wsXDfDTj//pK9qOuvkvSLrUUBw1i3e9zK0ajclALM6BInYzWYd lR7w6MAdH6A7nTTRe37aaa/HW6re1B4aHD6A24DvyNA8e/Ivza4u78p/fG6pO37T mL+TafsDrCFyK19Ko/aneL1n3rIPc20mcn3+EJseL07kOw7FH8fwJ08qlrjdM3Pi 419+fglQ9767vlS/loYJabfWf0Rx9uYSbWiSa5ewevWNXZ9lER7SBzYv3Inrsbih /Cun9vdh1BPpo8j2gyRFZFnz8yDbQ9eum021GSLdtEUEluZ9CrmgiB1FOhCzVx6Z epwIGh+oU4za5BgZiEdI =DkyW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=ys6dktfrwsrjgtms+yn_myiba3fnphxaxbolg2eb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian showing less RAM
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote: On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:18:18PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i was using i686 kernel now i just updated amd64 it worked aptitude install linux-image-2.6-amd64 root@lion:~# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 8134920 833728051548 0 2272 17392 -/+ buffers/cache: 637088071212 Swap: 15623088 0 15623088 but my second question about disk space is still a confusiong. please help Many Linux file systems (ext2/3/4, definitely. I'm not sure about others), reserve 5% of the space for root. That means that when the disk is showing 100% full, root can still, say, compress a run-away log file and then delete it. You can either live with that safety net, or use a tool such as tune2fs to adjust it. Thanks it worked :) tune2fs -m 2 /dev/mapper/pve--vg-root On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i am using debian 6.0.4. i have 8GB of ram installed in a server 2GB x 4. bios also shows 8 GB. however top only shows 2gb or RAM top - 15:48:29 up 16 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 Tasks: 90 total, 1 running, 89 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.6%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2273280k total,79768k used, 2193512k free, 2292k buffers Swap: 15623088k total,0k used, 15623088k free,45456k cached root@lion:~# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 2273280 797682193512 0 2292 45456 -/+ buffers/cache: 320202241260 Swap: 15623088 0 15623088 Secondly. root@lion:~# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/pve--vg-root 442G 550M 419G 1% / i dont know if its normal but things are confusing me a bit. i have working space of 442G used 550MB and available 419MB there almost 22GB is missing. please help. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmm_pvwxn9ddsq3vvbs9vsmtu96kjnfgejkpicsob_k...@mail.gmail.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQIlrnAAoJEKB7YbRsd8TGouUP/i0RCr/vmWQVeV5y1frGqpyx eTBJJnzBPr6HuIW2wKHDoRRU09Lexx0AhBMvtiMrh6i6fZCV+/Fb6zMvKzlz4RCF lPy5Oz2/3kxkFiqSObnrG94/Vq+nn85x2nfszf8AqX9YXeTVICrjrIuvkH+5hTFu AkVY2mgWtgRUl9pnMr+Aa1DdJqAEQQhtOceRRvZmenXqf/qbWGeFgQdWg1pNO7m9 V7NXiMrnnwOgq5e4mCMjcKFWW9vpx+vPeMAURWK+9WwHIGORXE49281F+f3+w3eT ZWvP8vFxRuBSMBAcZQ3eJNz8P0N5UCk/xGKXejdNXPmUbQSH3A70rUONw+HRdYRP saEggjKLFx4aDltOUIP6sKMf0A4KZIHqJLzydT+DkvaTEv+STvranIatZ9uDcNeJ ejLcCS8XaAB6by8wWefCnquUhY0iQ8SJd9XGrHGOhGi5ZW424oQMbIznDYI7rDjT gVpa0twg5TI2yq5U1aLYKZy+eDJ6rgg/2MKu3KyzmBQ7HdFp7Cps9VP7HZR+Ie9c +n9u3IqAnv4jmac3hH7eZAS3QnbuifqKwZVe036Fvx3E2Hr1Vt41XqKJT4+BECKc fU2bvLSjP4ot45HeDOM2p99agA08VMGProy4j9XFQAJKHlIbCSXt6jRQmHjxGpVr BwDpjZZ4n7XjZYkVyKTB =SS92 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkoe4vyssoqfij088l9vdt3nejngu7xkrvvjuhprng...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian showing less RAM
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan: i was using i686 kernel now i just updated amd64 it worked aptitude install linux-image-2.6-amd64 root@lion:~# free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 8134920 833728051548 0 2272 17392 -/+ buffers/cache: 637088071212 Swap: 15623088 0 15623088 Do you have 32-bit user space? file /bin/ls tells for example Using a 64-Bit kernel with 32-bit user space can create problems. I had it once that X.org with Intel drivers tended to crash badly which was gone after I switched to a 32-bit kernel again. So I suggest you either use 32-bit bigmem kernel or reinstall with 64-bit. I´d recommend the second option considering that your machine has 8 GiB. thanks for sharing your experience, i am doing it right aways since i can not take any risk becuase this system will be put in production. Thanks... -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208082157.57350.mar...@lichtvoll.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmn_vcwvnipzrnpuo5qk6ty5vgxypsxb8cp1tnbbpxr...@mail.gmail.com
debian 6.0.5 ISO installation issue. GRUB .. file not found
i just installed debian from 6.0.5 amd64 net CD. with basic options. installation went fine but in first boot. shows me this Welcome to GRUB error : file not found grub rescue and now i dont know what to do in rescue mode. since this is my first time that i am facing this issue so kindly help. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=k4cf_wb00evgxxqzwappjotfj9xlv1dkqvyvq_kn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.5 ISO installation issue. GRUB .. file not found
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk wrote: On Thu 09 Aug 2012 at 16:55:23 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i just installed debian from 6.0.5 amd64 net CD. with basic options. installation went fine but in first boot. shows me this Welcome to GRUB error : file not found grub rescue You installed GRUB to the MBR of the first hard disk? if you mean the grub installation ask to install grub in /dev/sda . then yes i did and it was installed with no errors. and now i dont know what to do in rescue mode. since this is my first time that i am facing this issue so kindly help. Please post the output of the command 'ls -l' ok ill post that next day from office. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809120633.GK6660@desktop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmrdsBJfH+yrMsz6-L8Rdo7P=k2aCF=F7v=6_m6jem...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.5 ISO installation issue. GRUB .. file not found
ok ill perform the the said instructions next day in office. but let me share you guys some of my partitions settings. that might help to understand the scenario more clearly. i have 2. 500GB of HD with raid1 set.fail-over to each other with boot support. 1. /boot (raid1) 2. Swap (raid1) 3. root on LVM on raid1. so i have 3 raid devices and on 3rd one root Partition is on top of LVM i am using the same procedure that i use to install with debian lenny and old squeeze but this is the first time that it showed me this error. i think about the same as you suggested about using debian live CD and install the grub manually. but there is no such command grub-install. i found a command grub-installer. so i didnt knew how to use it. please correct me if my limited knowledge leading me to a wrong direction. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Arno Schuring aelschur...@hotmail.com wrote: Muhammad Yousuf Khan (sir...@gmail.com on 2012-08-09 16:55 +0500): i just installed debian from 6.0.5 amd64 net CD. with basic options. installation went fine but in first boot. shows me this Welcome to GRUB error : file not found grub rescue If memory serves me right, you need to rescue set root=(hd0,1) Assuming that /boot is a separate partition, created as /dev/sda1. Season to taste. The grub shell has tab-completion, not sure if the rescue shell has the same. If the installer created one single partition, you may also need rescue set prefix=($root)/boot/grub rescue insmod normal rescue normal And from there the regular grub commands (linux, initrd) should work. There may also be a command to start the menu from there (insmod gfxmenu?). An easier but slower solution is to boot again from the installation disc, start a rescue shell and re-run grub-install and update-grub. Regards, Arno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809165340.4d3f0...@viper.intra.loos.site -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkADTQ=uqm2xvptzv9m4b7hsivwftphpqi7ysuypvr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.5 ISO installation issue. GRUB .. file not found
ok it is resolved, here is what i did. since the grub has mistakenly installed on RAID drive (md0) and not on /dev/sda or /dev/sdb MBRs. however i could not understand why is that happen. i am following the same linux installation that i used to with old version it just happen to me with 6.0.5. anyways this is what i did. Grub rescuels (which showed me all the devices including RAID ones) Grub rescue ls (md/0)/ (and i found grub folder on root of md/0) Grub rescueset root=(md/0) (/ was their so i add it) Grub rescueset prefix=(md/0)/grub Grub rescue insmod normal Grub rescue normal when i reach the prompt after root password. i run grub-install /dev/sda and grub-install /dev/sdb so both devices could be used as failover. i hope this helps others. Thanks for the support Arno and Brian. Thanks, On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: ok ill perform the the said instructions next day in office. but let me share you guys some of my partitions settings. that might help to understand the scenario more clearly. i have 2. 500GB of HD with raid1 set.fail-over to each other with boot support. 1. /boot (raid1) 2. Swap (raid1) 3. root on LVM on raid1. so i have 3 raid devices and on 3rd one root Partition is on top of LVM i am using the same procedure that i use to install with debian lenny and old squeeze but this is the first time that it showed me this error. i think about the same as you suggested about using debian live CD and install the grub manually. but there is no such command grub-install. i found a command grub-installer. so i didnt knew how to use it. please correct me if my limited knowledge leading me to a wrong direction. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Arno Schuring aelschur...@hotmail.com wrote: Muhammad Yousuf Khan (sir...@gmail.com on 2012-08-09 16:55 +0500): i just installed debian from 6.0.5 amd64 net CD. with basic options. installation went fine but in first boot. shows me this Welcome to GRUB error : file not found grub rescue If memory serves me right, you need to rescue set root=(hd0,1) Assuming that /boot is a separate partition, created as /dev/sda1. Season to taste. The grub shell has tab-completion, not sure if the rescue shell has the same. If the installer created one single partition, you may also need rescue set prefix=($root)/boot/grub rescue insmod normal rescue normal And from there the regular grub commands (linux, initrd) should work. There may also be a command to start the menu from there (insmod gfxmenu?). An easier but slower solution is to boot again from the installation disc, start a rescue shell and re-run grub-install and update-grub. Regards, Arno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120809165340.4d3f0...@viper.intra.loos.site -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmm48wfms2r8k1qcide18am5fdvw6kd4kaesdzqpq1z...@mail.gmail.com
iscsi debian. suggestion needed
Dear All, i am looking into HA (or in other words to minimize restoration process time) for virtualization in linux. i am using debian as a base system KVM-Qemu as virtual environment. now i am exploring different methods of HA. like DRBD, Rsync or ISCSI. so that if main server hardware fails then other system would serve the purpose. with out wasting my time in restoring backup. so is there any one who is using linux ISCI SAN box for their virtualization rather dell, or any other vendor. so just wanted to know the pros and cons / stability / complexity . since i am already dived into Linux so study wont be an issue. and of course i know that LAN card can only give me around 1GB throughput. but my data transmit is not that huge. we are a small company with 25 nodes and i think more or less 1 GB would be more then enough. any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmne7dvquntecrpjeehcjw+2twnzmktyniaxueu1tky...@mail.gmail.com
Re: lvcreate throws error : device not cleared
http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=1206 This might help On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list, I'm with debian wheezy with lvm2 2.02.95-4. whenever I try to execute lvcreate it fails. Here is the output of such a command `` #lvcreate -v -n root -L 80G mygroup Setting logging type to disk Finding volume group mygroup Archiving volume group mygroup metadata (seqno 7). Creating logical volume root Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 8). Found volume group mygroup activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking only host tags for mygroup/root Creating mygroup-root Loading mygroup-root table (254:1) Resuming mygroup-root (254:1) Clearing start of logical volume root /dev/mygroup/root: not found: device not cleared Aborting. Failed to wipe start of new LV. Found volume group mygroup Removing mygroup-root (254:1) Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 9). semid 7340034: semop failed for cookie 0xd4ddd6c: incorrect semaphore state Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore identified by cookie value 223206764 (0xd4ddd6c) to initialize waiting for incoming notifications. ` Am I missing anything ? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817153019.07ad8...@shiva.selfip.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkucwtfdz4grh7mowbnsperooc_0snp3sf1yckt0wl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: lvcreate throws error : device not cleared
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:28 PM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, [-Z n] only works with a warrning -Z, --zero y/n Controls zeroing of the first KB of data in the new logical volume. Default is yes. Warning: trying to mount an unzeroed logical volume can cause the system to hang. so be careful. i haven't tried this either. for further reference check this http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl8_lvcreate.htm [...] WARNING: root not zeroed Logical volume root created [...] What does it mean and will it create any issue in future ? TIA On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:18:41 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=1206 This might help On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list, I'm with debian wheezy with lvm2 2.02.95-4. whenever I try to execute lvcreate it fails. Here is the output of such a command `` #lvcreate -v -n root -L 80G mygroup Setting logging type to disk Finding volume group mygroup Archiving volume group mygroup metadata (seqno 7). Creating logical volume root Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 8). Found volume group mygroup activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking only host tags for mygroup/root Creating mygroup-root Loading mygroup-root table (254:1) Resuming mygroup-root (254:1) Clearing start of logical volume root /dev/mygroup/root: not found: device not cleared Aborting. Failed to wipe start of new LV. Found volume group mygroup Removing mygroup-root (254:1) Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 9). semid 7340034: semop failed for cookie 0xd4ddd6c: incorrect semaphore state Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore identified by cookie value 223206764 (0xd4ddd6c) to initialize waiting for incoming notifications. ` Am I missing anything ? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817153019.07ad8...@shiva.selfip.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=lfbmhak7htt3aqgcoilmmbgll6yzbrsw1fo7rog2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: lvcreate throws error : device not cleared
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:28 PM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, [-Z n] only works with a warrning -Z, --zero y/n Controls zeroing of the first KB of data in the new logical volume. Default is yes. FYI it is just a work around. let see if others might help with some detailed suggestion. Warning: trying to mount an unzeroed logical volume can cause the system to hang. so be careful. i haven't tried this either. for further reference check this http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl8_lvcreate.htm [...] WARNING: root not zeroed Logical volume root created [...] What does it mean and will it create any issue in future ? TIA On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:18:41 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=1206 This might help On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, J. B baksh...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list, I'm with debian wheezy with lvm2 2.02.95-4. whenever I try to execute lvcreate it fails. Here is the output of such a command `` #lvcreate -v -n root -L 80G mygroup Setting logging type to disk Finding volume group mygroup Archiving volume group mygroup metadata (seqno 7). Creating logical volume root Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 8). Found volume group mygroup activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking only host tags for mygroup/root Creating mygroup-root Loading mygroup-root table (254:1) Resuming mygroup-root (254:1) Clearing start of logical volume root /dev/mygroup/root: not found: device not cleared Aborting. Failed to wipe start of new LV. Found volume group mygroup Removing mygroup-root (254:1) Creating volume group backup /etc/lvm/backup/mygroup (seqno 9). semid 7340034: semop failed for cookie 0xd4ddd6c: incorrect semaphore state Failed to set a proper state for notification semaphore identified by cookie value 223206764 (0xd4ddd6c) to initialize waiting for incoming notifications. ` Am I missing anything ? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120817153019.07ad8...@shiva.selfip.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnkTMzBBBWAWMEfvCf=von5pwrh82sj_k9bp0p5rle...@mail.gmail.com
Re: iscsi debian. suggestion needed
Any help please ? :) On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, i am looking into HA (or in other words to minimize restoration process time) for virtualization in linux. i am using debian as a base system KVM-Qemu as virtual environment. now i am exploring different methods of HA. like DRBD, Rsync or ISCSI. so that if main server hardware fails then other system would serve the purpose. with out wasting my time in restoring backup. so is there any one who is using linux ISCI SAN box for their virtualization rather dell, or any other vendor. so just wanted to know the pros and cons / stability / complexity . since i am already dived into Linux so study wont be an issue. and of course i know that LAN card can only give me around 1GB throughput. but my data transmit is not that huge. we are a small company with 25 nodes and i think more or less 1 GB would be more then enough. any suggestion would be highly appreciated. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMk1yQeQCTmMLKUjxXwbN7aovQv5YtKsah=iv69zjfw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Xen vs KVM
i am using proxmox KVM.. on 3 base servers for more then 2 years. i do migrate, backup and all the process intensive task and every thing. till today i havent found any issue related to stabitliy. once i remeber i havent started my virtual machines for 4 monts,and my base, i never found a reason to restart the base server for about a year. but then my HD died :(. my virtual base is running more then 15 VMs. i haven't tried Xen yet so nothing to add about stability in Xen. Thanks, On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:23 PM, francis picabia fpica...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: Unless there's a fedora-devel thread where this was discussed, there's probably no way to know why RHEL6 switched to kvm except to assume that kvm's in-kernel and xen isn't. This has changed in the latest kernels so xen support might very well be re-added, and possibly favored, in RHEL7. This is uninformed. I don't know why you bother to write it. Please visit the Redhat web site and search for information on virtualization. Here is one of the many news items one can google showing Redhat has dropped Xen in favour of KVM. KVM is the cornerstone of Redhat's attempt to compete with VMware solution. Xen support in Redhat is set to expire in 2014. http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/red-hat-drops-xen-in-favor-kvm-in-rhel-6-498 Here is the 2008 announcement regarding Redhat's purchase of Qumaranet, which may answer some questions about xen and kvm in Redhat's future (now the present). http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+akb6goujtbdmmzbaeezc-fyqk_-6cnu4s6fo-peh74o+b...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmklfqofkqg_stktrk6+pguet0qef2xzldoaxl+ahvx...@mail.gmail.com
Windows 2003 AD to Samba4 Migration
i wanted to migrate Windows 2003 AD to Samba For DC with out rejoining the clients and down time.Such as Additional Domain Controller actually, i am Planning migrating my microsoft infrastructure to linux gradually. i successfully migrated Fileserver, Virtualization, Proxy. now my goal is to replace my domain controller holding 2003 server. i have a mix client (33 nodes) infrastructure including, WindowXP, 2003 Memeber server and Windows 7 while all are memeber of domain with default GPO, though i wanted to use GPOs in future via samba4, here is the detail of my domain controller, 1. 2003 Active directory 2. active directory integrated DNS with DNS forwarder. 3. DHCP. so my questions are. As per my understanding with DC . i can use ADC for failover. - is it possible to install samba DC as an ADC and later promoted to DC? - is there any one has migrated windows DC to SAMBA DC. what was his/her strategy/experience (any suggestions would be appreciated). - can anyone please tell me about the stability of SAMBA4. with his personal experience , since it is in beta stage? because my 2003 DC server is in production and i don't have a clue that beta is a better way to go in production or not. my requirement with samba4 after migration are. 1. DC 2. Integrated DNS so that when ever host join's. DNS records and other updates in AD should be done by it self. (same ad windows AD) 3. DHCP 4. Group policy implementation. BTW, i am using 2.7 SAMBA as file sharing server integrated with 2003 AD. so is it going to effect the migration or not? or samba 2.7 with consider SAMBA4 machine as an old DC. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=rnx3xs7admfaea-0q+fgkfnrq8k_wxlmcffb7jdw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Windows 2003 AD to Samba4 Migration
any help please? On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i wanted to migrate Windows 2003 AD to Samba For DC with out rejoining the clients and down time.Such as Additional Domain Controller actually, i am Planning migrating my microsoft infrastructure to linux gradually. i successfully migrated Fileserver, Virtualization, Proxy. now my goal is to replace my domain controller holding 2003 server. i have a mix client (33 nodes) infrastructure including, WindowXP, 2003 Memeber server and Windows 7 while all are memeber of domain with default GPO, though i wanted to use GPOs in future via samba4, here is the detail of my domain controller, 1. 2003 Active directory 2. active directory integrated DNS with DNS forwarder. 3. DHCP. so my questions are. As per my understanding with DC . i can use ADC for failover. - is it possible to install samba DC as an ADC and later promoted to DC? - is there any one has migrated windows DC to SAMBA DC. what was his/her strategy/experience (any suggestions would be appreciated). - can anyone please tell me about the stability of SAMBA4. with his personal experience , since it is in beta stage? because my 2003 DC server is in production and i don't have a clue that beta is a better way to go in production or not. my requirement with samba4 after migration are. 1. DC 2. Integrated DNS so that when ever host join's. DNS records and other updates in AD should be done by it self. (same ad windows AD) 3. DHCP 4. Group policy implementation. BTW, i am using 2.7 SAMBA as file sharing server integrated with 2003 AD. so is it going to effect the migration or not? or samba 2.7 with consider SAMBA4 machine as an old DC. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=0xqpetynr4yb9cumcu22l7oh1nv2g9ubvuyer1gp...@mail.gmail.com
rsyslog not sending message to remote syslog.
i have deployed logAnalyzer and been using it for about 4 months. things seems to be working find but today i found out that my /var/log/syslog contains this Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372478] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372487] ata1: EH complete Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059325] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059413] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x4 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059514] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059620] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:08:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 tag 0 dma 4096 in Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059621] res 51/40:00:0a:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 Emask 0x9 (media error) which is a hardware badsector notification. and i could not see this on log analyzer. however other logs from this server are showed as expected. i am using *.* @@logserver.test.com which means everything and this error is very critical , this must have showed in to the remote server. can anyone please help me to make it sending these types of critical error to log server. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkxnxsk+k2wzjq+5b4f5j6tavs6wcrfmehwfvqcsqh...@mail.gmail.com
how to fix logical bad sectors
i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that. root@lion:~# smartctl -A /dev/sda 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051Pre-fail Always - 1 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0027 152 150 021Pre-fail Always - 3375 4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 59 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 072 072 000Old_age Always - 21113 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0032 100 253 000Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 253 000Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 57 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 48 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 177 177 000Old_age Always - 70694 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 117 099 000Old_age Always - 26 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 199 199 000Old_age Always - 154 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 253 000Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 100 253 000Old_age Offline - 0 root@lion:~# smartctl -A /dev/sdb 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0027 150 148 021Pre-fail Always - 3475 4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 55 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 081 081 000Old_age Always - 14265 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0032 100 253 000Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 253 000Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always - 53 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 45 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0032 189 189 000Old_age Always - 34955 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 117 099 000Old_age Always - 26 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 253 000Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x0032 200 200 000Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 100 253 000Old_age Offline - 0 this is the first time i am dealing with this, is this some thing that i have to be worried about? Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk4j7mv-k1yxxdcrf+uxuttywudrusbg3wrqnrkzwu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: how to fix logical bad sectors
but my /var/log/syslog showing this Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372478] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372487] ata1: EH complete Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059325] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059413] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x4 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059514] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059620] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:08:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 tag 0 dma 4096 in Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059621] res 51/40:00:0a:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 Emask 0x9 (media error) do i have to worry about this? On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Sthu Deus sthu.d...@gmail.com wrote: Good time of the day, Muhammad. You wrote: i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that. I also did not have such a problem. But I think, that You have not to worry about this unless huge amount of sectors will become bad in short period of time. - The HDD will relocate it itself, marking the primary ones as bad and that's it. Sthu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503b4bba.c31c700a.4625.1...@mx.google.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnjNqpxKeG_QUSNL2wFrDhwuKChK=nsojmhtvy3xqv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: how to fix logical bad sectors
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:21:41 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Sthu Deus sthu.d...@gmail.com wrote: Good time of the day, Muhammad. You wrote: i am using RAID 1 on 2x500GB harddrives. and one of my drive shows Current_Pending_Sector 154. how can i fix that. You can't. Modern hard disks handle this by themselves in a process that is transparent for the user (they mark the bad sectors so they are not used again). You have to worry though if this value (Current_Pending_Sector) starts increasing very quickly. After all, as you are using raid 1 you are covered by this (i.e., a hard disk failure), right? ;-P I also did not have such a problem. But I think, that You have not to worry about this unless huge amount of sectors will become bad in short period of time. - The HDD will relocate it itself, marking the primary ones as bad and that's it. Exactly. but my /var/log/syslog showing this Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.347932] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.348008] ata1.00: error: { UNC } Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372478] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [6.372487] ata1: EH complete Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059325] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059413] ata1.00: BMDMA stat 0x4 Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059514] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059620] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:08:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 tag 0 dma 4096 in Aug 27 12:11:37 lion kernel: [9.059621] res 51/40:00:0a:78:1b/00:00:00:00:00/e2 Emask 0x9 (media error) do i have to worry about this? Sure you do. What's connected to ata1.00? (dmesg | grep -i ata1.00) These errors are usually derived not from bad sectors but a hardware issue (e.g., bad/loosey cabling). Just to be sure, you can run a full SMART test to diagnose any problem from the disk and better if you use the hdd manufacturer's test disk tools which are usually run from a small live-cd iso. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1g0ig$9nj$1...@ger.gmane.org here you go. [2.920604] ata1.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) [2.955968] ata1.00: ATA-8: WDC WD5000AVVS-63M8B0, 01.00A01, max UDMA/133 [2.955972] ata1.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) [2.961570] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 would you please tell me one more thing. i am using rsyslog server but i can not see this critical error on that rsyslog server. i am using this in /etc/rsyslog.conf *.* @@MySyslogServer which is working fine however it suppose to show this msg also. any experience person would like to throw some light on that plz. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk1ojoopt_+lxxo457ffnyqawqohuvkth7runmx1wp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: how to fix logical bad sectors
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:52 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: (...) do i have to worry about this? Sure you do. What's connected to ata1.00? (dmesg | grep -i ata1.00) These errors are usually derived not from bad sectors but a hardware issue (e.g., bad/loosey cabling). Just to be sure, you can run a full SMART test to diagnose any problem from the disk and better if you use the hdd manufacturer's test disk tools which are usually run from a small live-cd iso. here you go. [2.920604] ata1.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) [2.955968] ata1.00: ATA-8: WDC WD5000AVVS-63M8B0, 01.00A01, max UDMA/133 [2.955972] ata1.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) [2.961570] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 That's one of your hard disks so you definitely have to worry for the above errors. You can get WD diagnostic tool from here: Data Lifeguard Diagnostic for DOS (CD) http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?groupid=610sid=30lang=en If both SATA drives pass the tests then open your computer case and reseat/ reconnect the SATA cables (or better yet, replace them with a set of quality SATA cables). Another test you can perform is getting the ISO image for SystemRescueCD (livecd) and boot with it. From here you can check if the errors are gone or still present (by doing so you can discard/confirm a problem coming from the raid 1 layout that you have set in your main system because the livecd will see/treat both disks independently, not raided). would you please tell me one more thing. i am using rsyslog server but i can not see this critical error on that rsyslog server. (...) Sorry, but this is not the proper thread to talk about that. Anyway, I already read the other post you sent about the issue but I have no idea on rsyslog and remote logging, sorry ;-( No problem :). thanks for all the support Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1ikac$ik9$7...@ger.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=5vrdnywhilv9y29gxhmlfwcawde0wx-epj0+rtkf...@mail.gmail.com
Re: internet speed
For me what work is DNS, most of the time i face slow net issue it is oftenly problem with my primary DNS. it takes time when DNS query shifts from primary to secondary if primary timed out. so better you check the response from DNS too. my be this would help. IMO ykhan On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:38 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Recently I notice my laptop's internet connection speed is really slow. and sometimes seems no connection. I don't know how to start to examine, any suggestions? Thanks with best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5069aae2.2030...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=6Q0MB6p=OTQ_w-JP076a6DnngzCiAnrKjiHm=_yg...@mail.gmail.com
resolve.conf missing
i just installed Debian squeeze 6.0.4 with net install CD. everything went Ok but the problem is i could not find resolve.conf file in /etc/. so i have to create the file manually however still i can not use the file because whenever i place my internal DNS like nameserver 10.X.X.8 and try to ping google.com and it faild eventually. Note : my DNS is reachable and successfully pinged from the mentioned machine. root@cheetah:~# ping google.com ping: unknown host google.com root@cheetah:~# cat /etc/resolve.conf nameserver 10.x.x.8 root@cheetah:~# kindly help me to resolve the issue. Thanks you, MYK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkzooms0pgl+c_pte19pi9zc7o2ptnwdy9embm-qbz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: resolve.conf missing
Sorry! my mistake i created a file with wrong file name the correct spelling is resolv.conf i mistakenly add the e. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just installed Debian squeeze 6.0.4 with net install CD. everything went Ok but the problem is i could not find resolve.conf file in /etc/. so i have to create the file manually however still i can not use the file because whenever i place my internal DNS like nameserver 10.X.X.8 and try to ping google.com and it faild eventually. Note : my DNS is reachable and successfully pinged from the mentioned machine. root@cheetah:~# ping google.com ping: unknown host google.com root@cheetah:~# cat /etc/resolve.conf nameserver 10.x.x.8 root@cheetah:~# kindly help me to resolve the issue. Thanks you, MYK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmYG=WZs7WVugNjs=c41_tse10sudmgaxk_4mjecvf...@mail.gmail.com
command history via Web-console.
Hello everyone, I am using few web front end tools in debian and other destros and for learning purpose i would like to know the command history that has been ran via Web console. does linux provide any option by which i can check the history of commands. Thanks, MYK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmngqzhouhxec38ntddc+udq9s1jofeerqeufvp1umd...@mail.gmail.com
*URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
i resize the LV from 300 GB to 400 GB then i ran the listed commands e2fsck -f /dev/mapper/vg--800-Archive400GB resize2fs -p /dev/mapper/vg--800-Archive400GB now when i reboot the system ata3.01 : status: { DRDY ERR } ata3.01 : error : { UNC } ata3.01 : exception emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata3.01 : BMDMA stat 0x64 ata3.01 : failed command : read DMA my system is not booting up.giving me lots and lots of above erros. no matter what i do it doesnt give me the prompt. it is continuesly giving me this error. i tried recovery mod NO LUCK. it worked when i unplug the 800GB drive, things start working fine via default boot drives. however, i tried bootable CD. it shows the same error and i # all the partitions mount point that has been located on the said drive. but still can not get the prompt. PLease help, data is very important. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmniu6uxyvaar973edfygpaextlcfghuvh1zvmct1x1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
sorry, if i am miss leading with the error . actually i belive that this must have happen. by the lvresize command. actually every thing was working nice and smooth. here is the quick story. first i ran the command. 1. i resize the old partition lvresize -L 400GB VG-NAME with PATH 2 then i ran resize command resize2fs -p /dev/mapper/vg--800-Archive400GB but gives me error and tells me to run e2fsck -f 3. so i rant e2fsck -f /dev/mapper/vg--800-Archive400GB which was fine and even vg display and df -h showing the same size so i got relaxed that things are fine. 4. then i created another one for quota assignment to all the users lvcreate -L 245GB VG-NAME AND path-n name then i transfer the ext4 file system to it. i dont remeber the command but it was something.ext4 lv complete path 5 and i enabled the quota in fstab alog with the UUID to mount it on boot. 6. then i enabled kernal moudule. modprob qutoa_v2 echo qutoa_v2 /etc/modules (do you think it could be the module issue?) 7. for testing i mount the drive by mount usrquota source path mount point so it worked find . .. now next reboot problem started. thats the whole story.. Thanks On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:45:25PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i resize the LV from 300 GB to 400 GB Exactly what command did you type, and what feedback did you get? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502154926.GA6770@debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=Tq_oTKZd5S4Sf3a80kXTqP5GhFY1i5Z4=abxajcn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
i tried every single possibility regarding cables i have 3 HD i tried the smaller HDs cable it gives me the same error. actually i also installed quota module by modeprobe qutoa_v2 and echo qutoa_V2 /etc/moudels in fstab i added the UUID and ursquota keyword to for quota support. and the next start was very unfortunate . actually it is showing me the error on the point where RAID md devices are checked when i unpluged the problem drive it shows me md1 md2 and md0 status and after few logs it give me the problem but when plug the drive back, on the stage where it suppose to show the SW raid1 status it shows me this error. is there any possibility i can at least get the data back. i am 100% sure it is not a hardware problem. it has some configuration related problem. Thanks On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote: Hello Muhammad, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: ata3.01 : status: { DRDY ERR } ata3.01 : error : { UNC } ata3.01 : exception emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata3.01 : BMDMA stat 0x64 ata3.01 : failed command : read DMA This looks as if either the hard drive or the connection thereto is faulty. Try to connect the HDD to another SATA port. I don’t think it has anything to do with your resizing. Best regards good luck, Claudius -- Like I always say -- nothing can beat the BRATWURST here in DUSSELDORF!! http://chubig.net telnet nightfall.org 4242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=mZy29_s0cUyv3GDZA=czvmxg4h_q6dbukrnbxvvz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
at least there should be a way to reach the command prompt. is there any way to ignore this error and reach the command prompt so i can just copy the necessary data. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk8gjw_rolcbzyav9zk2c4+xtjjqrpguvyoev3w+ke...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2012 22:07:14 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message CAGWVfM=mZy29_s0cUyv3GDZA=czvmxg4h_q6dbukrnbxvvz...@mail.gmail.com: i tried every single possibility regarding cables i have 3 HD i tried the smaller HDs cable it gives me the same error. ..good, means hardware failure. Try another machine. actually i also installed quota module by modeprobe qutoa_v2 and echo qutoa_V2 /etc/moudels in fstab i added the UUID and ursquota keyword to for quota support. and the next start was very unfortunate . actually it is showing me the error on the point where RAID md devices are checked when i unpluged the problem drive it shows me md1 md2 and md0 status and after few logs it give me the problem but when plug the drive back, on the stage where it suppose to show the SW raid1 status it shows me this error. is there any possibility i can at least get the data back. i am 100% sure it is not a hardware problem. it has some configuration related problem. ..yes, and it could even be both. If your data is important, keep it safe and away from that machine until you know it is ok. E.g. flaky grid power can eat your power supply enough to e.g. kill a file system journal or leave it running on a read-only fs, force feeding you interesting challenges. can you please make it easy what you have :P i am not that good in english :-D what do you mean by readonly FS. and what do you mean by kill a file system. i am a newbie can you make it easy please but right now the problem is command prompt. is there any way that Debian just ignore the error and continue the boot and at least give me the command prompt where i can just copy all the stuff to USB or another drive. but let me shre you. i tried PXE boot via with clonezilla and different OS drives but keep giving me the same error and not letting me use the command prompt. any idea? Thanks Thanks On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote: Hello Muhammad, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: ata3.01 : status: { DRDY ERR } ata3.01 : error : { UNC } ata3.01 : exception emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata3.01 : BMDMA stat 0x64 ata3.01 : failed command : read DMA This looks as if either the hard drive or the connection thereto is faulty. Try to connect the HDD to another SATA port. I don’t think it has anything to do with your resizing. Best regards good luck, Claudius -- Like I always say -- nothing can beat the BRATWURST here in DUSSELDORF!! http://chubig.net telnet nightfall.org 4242 -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502200712.18a59...@celsius.lan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmXUZHb-wD=drr0as-pmyig8qqsofxy+ucnsmbsed-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote: Hello Muhammad, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: at least there should be a way to reach the command prompt. is there any way to ignore this error and reach the command prompt so i can just copy the necessary data. Probably not, because this error means that accessing whatever is attached to the third SATA port is somehow broken. You did not answer my previous questions: 1) Do other HDD work at this SATA port? actually i didnt check the SATA port however i change the working HD SATA port as i already share i have multiple drives in a box so the drive is showing the same error which shows that problem is not with sata 2) How does this HDD behave at another SATA port, preferably in another computer? You could also try to get an external enclosure and connect the HDD during runtime. ok ill try this external case suggestion However, I highly doubt that you can ‘just copy’ the necessary data of this drive. lets hope for the best. however i do have the copy but have to do lots and lots of work. which i hate now :( Best regards, Claudius PS: Please do not CC me. -- There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full. -- Henry Kissinger http://chubig.net telnet nightfall.org 4242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMk2tYsCejSA6ZemZE2O1W2jJ2Ymºnpvocb7b1nbt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: command history via Web-console.
ok, Thanks for the nice info. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I am using few web front end tools in debian and other destros and for learning purpose i would like to know the command history that has been ran via Web console. does linux provide any option by which i can check the history of commands. The operating system is simply a framework on which applications run. The operating system will not keep track of what your web administration interface runs. That will be up to your administrative interface and/or any utilities it's calling directly on the server. For example, if your utility calls the dpkg command in the background, that will be in /var/log/dpkg.log file. If it is doing things without calling operating system utilities, then it will have to have its own logs (probably, again, in /var/log). If it is not logging anything, then there is no way to retrieve a history of what it's doing. -- Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caoevnyvw050whbu5owmrl0rzqckyj4ona75vz80yxj67ssy...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmgkdhbjm9frkanb685hquswn1nzqquu5arzjdv+bz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
ok finally, recovering the data from old drive :(.. recovering data is not a big deal however creating the same directory infrastructure . rights assigning and stuff is pain .. Thanks for the support. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote: Hello Muhammad, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: at least there should be a way to reach the command prompt. is there any way to ignore this error and reach the command prompt so i can just copy the necessary data. Probably not, because this error means that accessing whatever is attached to the third SATA port is somehow broken. You did not answer my previous questions: 1) Do other HDD work at this SATA port? actually i didnt check the SATA port however i change the working HD SATA port as i already share i have multiple drives in a box so the drive is showing the same error which shows that problem is not with sata 2) How does this HDD behave at another SATA port, preferably in another computer? You could also try to get an external enclosure and connect the HDD during runtime. ok ill try this external case suggestion However, I highly doubt that you can ‘just copy’ the necessary data of this drive. lets hope for the best. however i do have the copy but have to do lots and lots of work. which i hate now :( Best regards, Claudius PS: Please do not CC me. -- There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full. -- Henry Kissinger http://chubig.net telnet nightfall.org 4242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmxgfatjwsvpqdfaku5koih+sujyctkrgdboapnena...@mail.gmail.com
Re: *URGENT* plz need help system not booting after lvresize command
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2012 23:56:06 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message CAGWVfMmXUZHb-wD=drr0as-pmyig8qqsofxy+ucnsmbsed-...@mail.gmail.com: On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2012 22:07:14 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message CAGWVfM=mZy29_s0cUyv3GDZA=czvmxg4h_q6dbukrnbxvvz...@mail.gmail.com: i tried every single possibility regarding cables i have 3 HD i tried the smaller HDs cable it gives me the same error. ..good, means hardware failure. Try another machine. actually i also installed quota module by modeprobe qutoa_v2 and echo qutoa_V2 /etc/moudels in fstab i added the UUID and ursquota keyword to for quota support. and the next start was very unfortunate . actually it is showing me the error on the point where RAID md devices are checked when i unpluged the problem drive it shows me md1 md2 and md0 status and after few logs it give me the problem but when plug the drive back, on the stage where it suppose to show the SW raid1 status it shows me this error. is there any possibility i can at least get the data back. i am 100% sure it is not a hardware problem. it has some configuration related problem. ..yes, and it could even be both. If your data is important, keep it safe and away from that machine until you know it is ok. E.g. flaky grid power can eat your power supply enough to e.g. kill a file system journal or leave it running on a read-only fs, force feeding you interesting challenges. can you please make it easy what you have :P i am not that good in english :-D ..like I said above, try your disks in _another_ machine. what do you mean by readonly FS. ..mount each of your disks with e.g. mount -vo,ro /dev/bad-disk.part0 /mnt. and what do you mean by kill a file system. ..you can _destroy_ _all_ of your data if you do a fsck or if you do a normal mount, which is usually a read-write mount, where you risk having your possibly bad file system journal try to repair your file system. ..I've had this happen twice on my own, and once on a client fs in the early days of ext3. No, I have no experience with lvm. i am a newbie can you make it easy please ..you asked for advice here on d-u@dlo. A wise start. but right now the problem is command prompt. ..no. _If_ you want to use that machine with your disks, _first_ take your disks out of that machine, and _then_ use a LiveCD or LiveUSB or some such to verify your machine is working ok, check ram, cpu, power supply _etc_, you probably have an hardware problem that caused your disk failures. is there any way that Debian just ignore the error and continue the boot and at least give me the command prompt where i can just copy all the stuff to USB or another drive. ..yes. Use a _working_ machine, one without bad hardware. You will find that _much_ easier, and _much_ cheaper than trying to mess with bad file systems on a blown up piece of junk. right now i didnt had enough time to troubleshoot so i just started recovering it from the backup disk. however i thought that it could be the partition level issue. (i mean logical) but i was wrong i deleted the partition via windows XP boot CD but still giving me the same error which means that there is some thing with the hardware.anyways bad luck. now constructing the whole thing again :( Thanks, but let me shre you. i tried PXE boot via with clonezilla and different OS drives but keep giving me the same error and not letting me use the command prompt. any idea? Thanks Thanks On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Claudius Hubig debian_1...@chubig.net wrote: Hello Muhammad, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: ata3.01 : status: { DRDY ERR } ata3.01 : error : { UNC } ata3.01 : exception emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata3.01 : BMDMA stat 0x64 ata3.01 : failed command : read DMA This looks as if either the hard drive or the connection thereto is faulty. Try to connect the HDD to another SATA port. I don’t think it has anything to do with your resizing. Best regards good luck, Claudius -- Like I always say -- nothing can beat the BRATWURST here in DUSSELDORF!! http://chubig.net telnet nightfall.org 4242 -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502200712.18a59...@celsius.lan -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come
Windows domain user in Linux
i am using winbind for samba to fetch users from windows domain. now i want to add a windows domain user administrator a member of group root. however when i run the command it gives me an error. #useradd -G root administrator useradd: user 'administrator' already exists Please Help. Thank you, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnA8=0kvxlpmmrbzatqrupqq65zwnn1g2cnm1u+9wj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Windows domain user in Linux
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Daniel Koch koch.daniel...@googlemail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 04.05.2012 09:32, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan: i am using winbind for samba to fetch users from windows domain. now i want to add a windows domain user administrator a member of group root. however when i run the command it gives me an error. #useradd -G root administrator useradd: user 'administrator' already exists Please Help. Thank you, What about: # adduser administrator root wwwowww It worked Thanks mate :) can i ask a question , why it worked by adduser and why not useradd as both commands works for a same purpose AFAIK Thanks, ? - -- Daniel Koch -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+j7GIACgkQOy1+jxP0nDmZ9ACeJpcOZYq1a6pcDDp9Brc1qpNz NcsAn1B8laCryqQH3yMQ3pgAMToOLUby =Gyuk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkvgtNv7qQUFCgY8Wh=P=sfkyryo9mawk3p_fprxk2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Windows domain user in Linux
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 12:32:31 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am using winbind for samba to fetch users from windows domain. now i want to add a windows domain user administrator a member of group root. however when i run the command it gives me an error. #useradd -G root administrator useradd: user 'administrator' already exists Is the user already in an external database? From man adduser: *** CAVEATS You may not add a user to a NIS or LDAP group. This must be performed on the corresponding server. Similarly, if the username already exists in an external user database such as NIS or LDAP, useradd will deny the user account creation request. *** In addition, if the user administrator already exists locally, you have to use usermod instead. Note: adding a user to the root's group can be dangerous. Thanks for the informative email, however administrator is me so thats the reason i added that. Thanks any ways, Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jo0rhj$3du$7...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkkubl0udlahfnznjumyejl6brn9px5jspt6qmvuju...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Windows domain user in Linux
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 21:06:58 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 04 May 2012 12:32:31 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am using winbind for samba to fetch users from windows domain. now i want to add a windows domain user administrator a member of group root. however when i run the command it gives me an error. #useradd -G root administrator useradd: user 'administrator' already exists Is the user already in an external database? From man adduser: *** CAVEATS You may not add a user to a NIS or LDAP group. This must be performed on the corresponding server. Similarly, if the username already exists in an external user database such as NIS or LDAP, useradd will deny the user account creation request. *** In addition, if the user administrator already exists locally, you have to use usermod instead. Note: adding a user to the root's group can be dangerous. Thanks for the informative email, however administrator is me so thats the reason i added that. Yes, but that's still dangerous. Why do you need to be in root's group? Because, there are few folders stored on samba storage where me as a administrator need to write files very often. so it seems easy to me that i have to just chmode 770 to the folder/file and things starts working accordingly. by the way , what kind of security consequences you are talking about? note : i am using this only for samba share Thanks any ways, You're welcome. Anyway, a quick note on your first one-liner: by re-reading man useradd I think you should use -g instead -G. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jo1fe4$3du$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmvpccg5mqrh01w5zj9wqcdv3wtu0dkdcochay703z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Windows domain user in Linux
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2012 16:19:52 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the informative email, however administrator is me so thats the reason i added that. Yes, but that's still dangerous. Why do you need to be in root's group? Because, there are few folders stored on samba storage where me as a administrator need to write files very often. Then you can adjust the share owner and permissions in a proper way. so it seems easy to me that i have to just chmode 770 to the folder/file and things starts working accordingly. Easy, can be (I can't tell because I don't know the details of your samba/ shares layout). Secure, not. mostly share are like this. [Library] comment = Shared Directories path = /hdxxx/100xx/libxxx/ read list = @all write list = nhasnain, admin read only = yes create mask = 0774 directory mask = 0774 by the way , what kind of security consequences you are talking about? An impersonated user that can access/read/delete your system files. note : i am using this only for samba share More reasons to avoid exposing your system security. Thanks , i got your point ... and i like it too. ill change the right infrastructure accordingly. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jo355m$4gr$4...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmwvnkdmtuwpfbw0t_0gn5-erodbtfjjgncz-m8kv8...@mail.gmail.com
samba / winbind and console loggin confusion
Dear All, i have been using Samba for almost 6 months but now there is a problem which i realize and now looking farword to resolve it. in files /etc/pam.d/common-auth and /etc/pam.d/common-account i put this line at the end of the file auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so now things are working fine ans per the expectation but one thing which i can not understand, when i try to logging to console screen it ask the password 3 times. 1 time it accepts doest give any error. second time login server not found and third time it accept the password. now when i commint(#) the said line from common-account it ask me the password only two times however things are working fine even if i commit the line in common account. here is some more setting detail over my samba server. [lobal] workgroup = ASSURETYCONSULT realm = ASSURETYCONSULTING.COM server string = %h server security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes pam password change = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . unix password sync = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 dns proxy = No panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: compat winbind group: compat winbind what can i do to make things back to normal. it suppose to ask the password only one time. note : via putty it works fine (ask the password only one time) Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=cypuygucw8gsiimrenyl6cns_g_grfhtonf+exvi...@mail.gmail.com
RAID broken .... /dev/sd? drive name changed
i have got 4 drives. /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd /dev/sda raid mirror with /dev/sdc and /dev/sdb was raid mirror with /dev/sdd now this time i unplug the /dev/sdd for some problem diagnostics now /dev/sdb becomes /dev/sdc and /dev/sdc becomes /dev/sdb and my whole raid got massed. help please. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmnmty9374oiamf8yobkogpozs4_9bndnqbbzgy5d4v...@mail.gmail.com
Re: samba / winbind and console loggin confusion
# /etc/pam.d/common-auth authsufficient pam_winbind.so authrequiredpam_unix.so use_first_pass do you mean above ? On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Rob Owens row...@ptd.net wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:35:04PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: Dear All, i have been using Samba for almost 6 months but now there is a problem which i realize and now looking farword to resolve it. in files /etc/pam.d/common-auth and /etc/pam.d/common-account i put this line at the end of the file auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so now things are working fine ans per the expectation but one thing which i can not understand, when i try to logging to console screen it ask the password 3 times. 1 time it accepts doest give any error. second time login server not found and third time it accept the password. Total guess here, but I've seen the words use_first_pass in pam files before. Maybe that could be applied to your case. -Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120507155055.ga20...@aurora.owens.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmegey6bjvgytdkobp3hdom-nwdqiceefx7pz8uarq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RAID broken .... /dev/sd? drive name changed
yes , i was using software RAID and it give me the error and told me to run fsck at the boot and when i did fsck it delete the whole data. and i am lost . On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jon Dowland j...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:13:14AM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i have got 4 drives. /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd /dev/sda raid mirror with /dev/sdc and /dev/sdb was raid mirror with /dev/sdd now this time i unplug the /dev/sdd for some problem diagnostics now /dev/sdb becomes /dev/sdc and /dev/sdc becomes /dev/sdb and my whole raid got massed. help please. What RAID technology are you using? Linux software RAID (mdadm) does not care about the specific naming of your drives. It uses records stored on the drives itself to identify which are RAID members. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120508080354.GA28964@debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmJN=34hk0-cpcam8anax5mzaetsttwxcyff7eavtv...@mail.gmail.com
debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk-zyddoquczzmgk+t7q6aay3ohibsvefqrhxrax3_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the partitions doesn't reflect in installation it is showing the old partition structure however when i go to shell and check things via FDISK it showed me the new created parttiion with boot flag on which i have create via commandline. Please help On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmmgbswr+zt1sha8wrdv0wtmdc6_c00i2+k4msdh48...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
by the way when i am creating partition via fdisk on 2TB HD . it showed that my starting block is 2048. instead of 1. i dont know why. however when i create the partition. via FDISK it gives me an error when i fdisk -l /dev/sda. like Partition does not start on physical sector boundary it happens when i create partition via installation CD. however when i create via fdisk via clonezilla CD and try to installed debian on these partition. installation doest recognize the partition. it shows drive is empty. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:20 PM, dage...@free.fr wrote: I had a similar problem recently with a SATA 3, 2 TB harddrive. Squeeze installed properly, grub installed properly. But when updating to wheezy (with a new grub version), grub didn't wanted to install on the MBR. Try to make a free partition at the start of the HD. - Mail original - De: Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com À: debian debian-user@lists.debian.org Envoyé: Mardi 8 Mai 2012 14:08:10 Objet: Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed. ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the partitions doesn't reflect in installation it is showing the old partition structure however when i go to shell and check things via FDISK it showed me the new created parttiion with boot flag on which i have create via commandline. Please help On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmmgbswr+zt1sha8wrdv0wtmdc6_c00i2+k4msdh48...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1585645016.116170685.1336483206019.javamail.r...@zimbra33-e6.priv.proxad.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkvtcyzsh+b79xe_luc_-cztxlzv3o7qzczjoxd+zv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. None of my boxes have a partition with the boot flag on. Did you use a GPT label? sorry i am not aware of GPT label, i am not that good. just using the default stuff What do your partitions look like? i am using Raid 1 3 partitions 1 gb for boot 4 gb for swap 200 gb for root and i left rest of the space for further configuration. after installation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=SzkYgOxNrvKUgZkj9jU=ven5J=SQco7or=qypeofhu...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmjkmhm6g0bvaiso-a-0mrb9f4nshaqagc8p5ihr3c...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
cfdisk to 2tb Drive give me this Warning!! Unsupported GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected. Use GNU Parted. since things were not booting up with 2TB so i just installed 320 GB HD so that things start well however after installation and after successful boot. when i cfdisk the primary partition it give me this error . FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition ends in the final partial cylind Press any key to exit cfdisk On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:08:10 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message cagwvfmmmgbswr+zt1sha8wrdv0wtmdc6_c00i2+k4msdh48...@mail.gmail.com: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. Thanks ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the partitions doesn't reflect in installation it is showing the old partition structure however when i go to shell and check things via FDISK it showed me the new created parttiion with boot flag on which i have create via commandline. Please help ..try cfdisk, it gives you eyes. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120508165048.08568...@celsius.lan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmjkanbr1uoytweh-ivhw4txktedoex1wl4xpanusv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: cfdisk to 2tb Drive give me this Warning!! Unsupported GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected. Use GNU Parted. since things were not booting up with 2TB so i just installed 320 GB HD so that things start well however after installation and after successful boot. when i cfdisk the primary partition it give me this error . FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition ends in the final partial cylind Press any key to exit cfdisk FYI : things are working normal no issues at all. On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:08:10 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message cagwvfmmmgbswr+zt1sha8wrdv0wtmdc6_c00i2+k4msdh48...@mail.gmail.com: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. Thanks ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the partitions doesn't reflect in installation it is showing the old partition structure however when i go to shell and check things via FDISK it showed me the new created parttiion with boot flag on which i have create via commandline. Please help ..try cfdisk, it gives you eyes. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120508165048.08568...@celsius.lan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkwpk7ccfk1dpf+u6dcdkxs8uvohpq_2oy3v16jdjy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
ok i used the parted command by mklabel gpt i created the partition but i want it to be linux raid. please help me to convert it to raid since i can not find option in parted to make it a fd linux raid type nor i can find anything related to this topic on google. and fdisk is not supporting the GPT . so i am stuck kindly help! On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:02:10 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error any idea why this? i never face this type of error before. please help. The error (at least the message because the underlying problem can be of a different nature) is documented here: http://wiki.debian.org/GrubRecover Check if the suggested steps help (take care of adjusting the commands for your GRUB version). Besides, if you are using raid 1 don't forget installing GRUB in both disks which are part of the array so the system can be automatically booted in the event one of them go down. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jobkg5$vio$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmn2nivocw4m7otcqzto4j8sdo9fzjymzgmy+ugzm3o...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
yes i got that , but first i thought. it is related to something LVM over RAID. which means more complexity thats why i didn't read thoroughly , thanks for the hit. On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darac Marjal mailingl...@darac.org.uk wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:15:43AM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: ok i used the parted command by mklabel gpt i created the partition but i want it to be linux raid. please help me to convert it to raid since i can not find option in parted to make it a fd linux raid type nor i can find anything related to this topic on google. and Really? I searched for parted raid (without quotes) and the first result I got was section 7 of the parted manual. That seems quite self-explanatory. fdisk is not supporting the GPT . so i am stuck kindly help! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPqj/8AAoJEKB7YbRsd8TGZy4QAIrBXH1Y8b4A2hwuYl6+21G8 FnjEfK/qvtBOVJrqWFF4ibRUHHj9MMc+iTObayFxAymp55mgS8kc6tRuYUlGjffw GSOE1kD+zvRemDA/PK5gPOTWVxm9tHSf6uXEEQg3lUBOkR1m32UQ/0FUB6gep7y9 /dMQffL185MEHBJNbwP/IlRHm9v4nRaEf+RbNSWCyjk+IBegQF5tOIGWtP/nXcJZ tOkSEisAWNFlnjYqf8ZcUVY3BhsZOyXaDyQeRnkG1h8Zb5f8ri+fF7D7HQPw4OiF Kf/eIPSx8+jDL2fNqR8ojhDNXOLi1uoYEvVyKZkBB8TWSzge0nq7/bTxJhhk+Rtw JxsOqak/mGzTaz0YamMYjyzQmBjY/wJQJ8BeQHwFeREq77sjC6o2KmaXuKDVQbRQ dNujLccTkt6pqFLcCDiCp8Ft5zBa51dOwIYec48NkoPgtlzt+tYHGmHqNaiZ94cC G0RI+EE+KlrRqMGFETyekJJt8oKrbsBnMpLxaodbxfL6GqVRk20yhMizdcprANS7 99TOlgui7G8cXo81Okelm8MDJX/KhXH+at6lltFi0FfsBoZoCQUNb6bhKqqN1rqr 1lXTjmhwA1/Dqz1TtQE/89F9BHn5u6V0l0f+muHWT3KPq6FDPb0xl/ACPYZ64cIE mb1UeGUDRsHzSu4AuJ1z =W4+V -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkeXw8_ug4tSCnf5R4+Sn_Av1=7OBCWbsT=1fS=cd3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
Thanks everyone for the kind support after long RD and your tips help me to went through the situation. Thanks every one. :) just FYI : i am using 320 GB HD for booting the system and 2TBx2 drives are just for RAID and backup the stuff things are started well. Thanks God :) Thank you all, On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:02:10 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not change the boot flag to on it was off and i hit several enters but it stays off. so i just continued with off. now when installation completed . setup stops at grup installation and throw an error grub-install /dev/sda failed its a fatal error The error (at least the message because the underlying problem can be of a different nature) is documented here: http://wiki.debian.org/GrubRecover Check if the suggested steps help (take care of adjusting the commands for your GRUB version). Besides, if you are using raid 1 don't forget installing GRUB in both disks which are part of the array so the system can be automatically booted in the event one of them go down. ok i used the parted command by mklabel gpt i created the partition but i want it to be linux raid. please help me to convert it to raid since i can not find option in parted to make it a fd linux raid type nor i can find anything related to this topic on google. and fdisk is not supporting the GPT . so i am stuck kindly help! Please bottom post. You don't need to set your partitions to linux raid because the default metadata for squeeze doesn't need it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caodoszncwnq-i8mxi1fwr-f5nvs9aytw7gu-q2zxn8uww...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMnBBT7QG62U=nm-my-7lapfubujvrto7ip53fo_bhy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: how to config network in squeeze
DHCP or STATIC? share the output ifconfig -a? On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Long Wind longwind2...@gmail.com wrote: in early debian distro, I set two PCs' IP (192.168.0.x) then they can ping each other now I install squeeze, with step above performed, I can't ping a PC running lenny ping says sth like destination unreachable What should I do? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAB-gxZBLCYKn=g7y0rm5umxw2rb9fwkefptuqxssfwvfuoy...@mail.gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkkzqeD6Q3Q23iwU=c1Kwix=vneee_aot_6pf5vpur...@mail.gmail.com
data recovery tools for debian (command line)
if i mistakenly delete any partition or OS or HD corrupted. what is the best tool that i can use to recover the data in these situations. just wanted to test this stuff in my test environment. note : i work with command line only. so preferably tool should be command line supported. since i don't like to use mouse :-) Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmnvxp7dgjn8lojhgtfnny83tcjp1feitxhvdczrfy1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, J. Bakshi baksh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:49:28 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: if i mistakenly delete any partition or OS or HD corrupted. what is the best tool that i can use to recover the data in these situations. de-rescue for corrupted HD. But don't know about recovering deleted data. I'm also interested in the same topic. testdisk http://www.howtoforge.com/data_recovery_with_testdisk seems good but haven't tested yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120510113108.6b49a...@shiva.selfip.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmktsv5s_lnamtcjuwowt_xwgs0a2hn3xzeoy-yp31j...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:34 AM, J. Bakshi baksh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:27:30 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, J. Bakshi baksh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:49:28 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: if i mistakenly delete any partition or OS or HD corrupted. what is the best tool that i can use to recover the data in these situations. de-rescue for corrupted HD. But don't know about recovering deleted data. I'm also interested in the same topic. testdisk http://www.howtoforge.com/data_recovery_with_testdisk seems good but haven't tested yet. How can I recover myfolder which I have already deleted by rm -rf myfolder sorry friend as i said i haven't tested this yet. see the howto, the link which is already shared Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMk++A26bH2vcUhQzJ=oJKrwhH2Xi9cJ=xtclajz5vr...@mail.gmail.com
mount fail via fstab but working with command line
i have 2TBx2 Drives with RAID 1. here is my RAID partitions layout and size is 500GB each made on GPT. /dev/md1 /dev/md2 /dev/md3 /dev/md4 i can mount the partition via command line very easily just by giving this command mount /dev/md4 /test/users however i can not mount them via fstab. it is giving me below error. Thu May 10 15:31:28 2012: /dev/md4: clean, 11/30547968 files, 1967930/122167518 blocks Thu May 10 15:31:29 2012: done. Thu May 10 15:31:29 2012: Mounting local filesystems...mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md4, Thu May 10 15:31:29 2012:missing codepage or helper program, or other error Thu May 10 15:31:29 2012:In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try Thu May 10 15:31:29 2012:dmesg | tail or so no matter i tried UUID and also /dev/md1/test/users ext4 default 0 2 nothing works here is my fstab proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # / was on /dev/sda3 during installation UUID=a2cb7b4e-1dac-422d-b5f0-f5aeb6c69cdf / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /boot was on /dev/sda1 during installation UUID=00219a44-4ce5-414a-b44f-c56405b60f9d /boot ext4 defaults0 2 # swap was on /dev/sda2 during installation UUID=4aaad274-fe6a-486a-a127-29d4584bee6e noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 my configuration portion # #md1 500GB for backup #md2 500GB for projects #UUID=5a6a7a11-1b9d-4681-a398-d4c86aabd89a /test/projects ext4 default 0 2 #/dev/md2/test/projects ext4default 0 2 #md3 500GB for office #UUID=b0047ee5-084d-44a8-b7f1-f7e040ec5c31 /test/officeext4 default 0 2 #md4 500gb for users /dev/md4 /test/users ext4default 0 2 my UUIDs #/dev/md4: UUID=23d47b04-18fd-4d65-8792-647bd5016a3f TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md3: UUID=b0047ee5-084d-44a8-b7f1-f7e040ec5c31 TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md2: UUID=5a6a7a11-1b9d-4681-a398-d4c86aabd89a TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md1: UUID=35cb0e66-f0cb-4895-ad9f-5101c88c3739 TYPE=ext4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=ED0oASHnpoFigbOvR0jgrF9ug+Dxn85tJmBZU=rp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mount fail via fstab but working with command line
Thanks for pointing out the error. yes it was a typo. Thanks alot. On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote: On Thursday 10 May 2012 12:57:07 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: here is my fstab /dev/md4 /test/users ext4 default 0 2 my UUIDs #/dev/md4: UUID=23d47b04-18fd-4d65-8792-647bd5016a3f TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md3: UUID=b0047ee5-084d-44a8-b7f1-f7e040ec5c31 TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md2: UUID=5a6a7a11-1b9d-4681-a398-d4c86aabd89a TYPE=ext4 #/dev/md1: UUID=35cb0e66-f0cb-4895-ad9f-5101c88c3739 TYPE=ext4 What about changing default to defaults Thierry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205101306.53066.tchate...@free.fr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmnp+gcfjyr+gghy1vbbplrwpvjd+chccsdpy2y0te7...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 10:49 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: if i mistakenly delete any partition or OS or HD corrupted. what is the best tool that i can use to recover the data in these situations. just wanted to test this stuff in my test environment. note : i work with command line only. so preferably tool should be command line supported. since i don't like to use mouse :-) Thanks For what file systems? any, ext2, 3 or 4 . just asked in general perspective. so instead of reading all the material on the net and filter out the garbage which is very time consuming. so just to make my studies time efficient and other like me also get some help as well. Thanks - Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336651423.2307.6.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMn3khO+6z9wqjwKEZELH=tb5cng+z87mwpqbhykv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
Thanks, Ralf and all, you guys have given me a solid info to study on. Thanks On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:32 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: For what file systems? any, ext2, 3 or 4 . just asked in general perspective. so instead of reading all the material on the net and filter out the garbage which is very time consuming. so just to make my studies time efficient and other like me also get some help as well. Parted Magic is a good live media to use. On Parted Magic there are command line tools such as ext3grep and extundelete and others. Mount the partition, where you deleted files as read only first. The recovered data will be written to another partition. Any writing to the partition with the deleted folders and files can overwrite important directory entries and/or data. Note, even reading can cause a write, IIRC e.g. if you don't mount with noatime, the last read access will be written to a file. I don't have all those commands and options in mind, but take care to use options that will recover the data in a human readable/usable format. IOW you'll get /my_dir/my_file_a /my_dir/my_file_b etc. and not no_dir_cryptic_filename_a no_dir_cryptic_filename_b. They also have got options to recover data that is from a special time etc.. All those tools for ext3 come with patches, they are usable for ext4, theoretically. In practice 99% of your data will be lost. I still have 2 unmounted ext4 partitions since December 2011. I nearly couldn't recover anything, but sure, I got back some data. if that is the case do you mean i should shift from ext4 to ext3. since i am using ext4 however there is no specific reason of using ext4. I experienced recovering partition tables as working 100% perfect. If there are errors on a HDD I experienced fsck -fcyv, fsck -f -y etc. as working properly too. You should read howtos. Use links e.g. given from an updated Wiki, the home page of the current version of your recovery live media you're using etc.. You never know if there won't be new tools or important changes. Hth, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336655317.2307.43.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk9q_se3jj86qv70kawyr1oz614b4ay34cymoo_d92...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
sorry ignore the last paragraph it was due to Email-Draft in Google. Thanks. On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, Ralf and all, you guys have given me a solid info to study on. Thanks On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:32 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: For what file systems? any, ext2, 3 or 4 . just asked in general perspective. so instead of reading all the material on the net and filter out the garbage which is very time consuming. so just to make my studies time efficient and other like me also get some help as well. Parted Magic is a good live media to use. On Parted Magic there are command line tools such as ext3grep and extundelete and others. Mount the partition, where you deleted files as read only first. The recovered data will be written to another partition. Any writing to the partition with the deleted folders and files can overwrite important directory entries and/or data. Note, even reading can cause a write, IIRC e.g. if you don't mount with noatime, the last read access will be written to a file. I don't have all those commands and options in mind, but take care to use options that will recover the data in a human readable/usable format. IOW you'll get /my_dir/my_file_a /my_dir/my_file_b etc. and not no_dir_cryptic_filename_a no_dir_cryptic_filename_b. They also have got options to recover data that is from a special time etc.. All those tools for ext3 come with patches, they are usable for ext4, theoretically. In practice 99% of your data will be lost. I still have 2 unmounted ext4 partitions since December 2011. I nearly couldn't recover anything, but sure, I got back some data. if that is the case do you mean i should shift from ext4 to ext3. since i am using ext4 however there is no specific reason of using ext4. I experienced recovering partition tables as working 100% perfect. If there are errors on a HDD I experienced fsck -fcyv, fsck -f -y etc. as working properly too. You should read howtos. Use links e.g. given from an updated Wiki, the home page of the current version of your recovery live media you're using etc.. You never know if there won't be new tools or important changes. Hth, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336655317.2307.43.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmm-gk23wkttel5dvpd4a2mpq8kj0lu6kzu4v_ufif1...@mail.gmail.com
mounting local filesystem ..... FAILED
i am running debian 6.0.4 i am getting this error on boot mounting local filesystem failed. however things are working fine like squid is working in firewall mode etc.. even i can see the same directory structure but df-h showing some thing like this filesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs 31G 1.3G 28G 5% / none 118M 124K 118M 1% /dev /dev/disk/by-uuid/4649883f-cece-4599-b117-e2ceb2dd3ebd 31G 1.3G 28G 5% / tmpfs 25M 120K 25M 1% /run tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 50M 0 50M 0% /tmp tmpfs 50M 0 50M 0% /run/shm here is FDISK result Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1405432558080 83 Linux /dev/sda240544178 9932815 Extended /dev/sda540544178 993280 82 Linux swap / Solaris blkid /dev/sda1: UUID=4649883f-cece-4599-b117-e2ceb2dd3ebd TYPE=ext3 /dev/sda5: UUID=617a2ecd-1c86-45b5-905f-ff3c6804a098 TYPE=swap here is my fstab # / was on /dev/sda1 during installation UUID=4649883f-cece-4599-b117-e2ceb2dd3ebd / ext3 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation UUID=617a2ecd-1c86-45b5-905f-ff3c6804a098 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkofky=pfmNYoxcgXOefsmvb=-uz-jcjrmgpdj8t1+...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mounting local filesystem ..... FAILED
is there anyone can help plz? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=pmbzv+vfvi-p1hqa0_0hibqf+kmqqfyn81lmjtgh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mounting local filesystem ..... FAILED
What you've posted there looks OK... What error message did you receive about mounting local filesystem failed? shared output is way much different then normally when i give the df -h command it gives me output like this /dev/sda3 289G 774M 274G 1% / tmpfs 500M 0 500M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 496M 236K 496M 1% /dev tmpfs 500M 0 500M 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 1.1G 48M 932M 5% /boot /dev/md1 459G 33G 403G 8% /nas/backup /dev/md2 459G 198M 435G 1% /nas/projects /dev/md3 459G 985M 435G 1% /nas/office /dev/md4 459G 198M 436G 1% /nas/users this is the whole message that i get at boot mounting local filesystem failed (in red color) so i thought that some thing is went wrong. secondly i never saw a UUID in df -h command so combining the new output of the df command and the error at start up i thought some thing more worst is about to unveil. Kind regards -- Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding answers to questions about Debian:- https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/Scott_Ferguson/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fae06dd.6050...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmngjz3tjvymspm-why_o4ppywmmlamr8wxa2nkbc-s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mounting local filesystem ..... FAILED
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 21:18:28 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am running debian 6.0.4 i am getting this error on boot mounting local filesystem failed. And besides the error, are you experiencing another problem/issue? Is the system booting as usual or are you facing any unexpected behaviour once the system has booted? however things are working fine like squid is working in firewall mode etc.. even i can see the same directory structure but df-h showing some thing like this filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs 31G 1.3G 28G 5% / none 118M 124K 118M 1% /dev (...) What that none means here? :-? hope this can explain you better. because i also dont know why its showing none Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1405432558080 83 Linux /dev/sda240544178 9932815 Extended /dev/sda540544178 993280 82 Linux swap / Solaris root@proxy-prod:/var/log# blkid /dev/sda1: UUID=4649883f-cece-4599-b117-e2ceb2dd3ebd TYPE=ext3 /dev/sda5: UUID=617a2ecd-1c86-45b5-905f-ff3c6804a098 TYPE=swap Are you missing something, for example, an external USB disk that should be recognized but it's not present? BTW , i am using Proxmox a KVM base virtual environment. so i am not sure about it however i think virtually they are mounting CD drive on USB as this log shows note the resume from disk failed msg [1.012097] usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 [1.168454] PM: Starting manual resume from disk [1.168457] PM: Resume from partition 8:5 [1.168458] PM: Checking hibernation image. [1.168856] PM: Error -22 checking image file [1.168858] PM: Resume from disk failed. [1.205291] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0627, idProduct=0001 [1.205295] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=3, SerialNumber=5 [1.205303] usb 1-1: Product: QEMU USB Tablet [1.205305] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: QEMU 0.15.0 [1.205306] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 42 [1.205379] usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [1.213087] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [1.213098] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [1.232655] usbcore: registered new interface driver hiddev Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jolerg$s0$7...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkt7u0i5yyokswdyfir7mh71xfya38x7+gbusfjtcr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: mounting local filesystem ..... FAILED
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 12 May 2012 16:56:04 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: (...) What that none means here? :-? hope this can explain you better. because i also dont know why its showing none (...) Nope, sorry, I'm afraid the above outputs add no more useful information. Are you missing something, for example, an external USB disk that should be recognized but it's not present? BTW , i am using Proxmox a KVM base virtual environment. so i am not sure about it however i think virtually they are mounting CD drive on USB as this log shows note the resume from disk failed msg [ 1.012097] usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 [ 1.168454] PM: Starting manual resume from disk [ 1.168457] PM: Resume from partition 8:5 [ 1.168458] PM: Checking hibernation image. [ 1.168856] PM: Error -22 checking image file [ 1.168858] PM: Resume from disk failed. (...) Wait, wait... was the error coming up after resuming or from a cold boot? it is on boot, And do you have any additional storage volume that you usually mount under /dev? It seems something pointing to /dev but I can't guess what. no only one virtual drive 32 gb. thats all. ok next working day ill delete the CDrom from VM and then ill check. and let you know the update Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jolk1q$s0$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmoafRbY_DZNjSyq8R-q6uyFaxFUovujLwb29L=jd5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: data recovery tools for debian (command line)
Thanks mate, so kind of you, thats going to be very helpful. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote: Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:01 AM, J. Bakshi baksh...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:49:28 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: if i mistakenly delete any partition or OS or HD corrupted. what is the best tool that i can use to recover the data in these situations. de-rescue for corrupted HD. But don't know about recovering deleted data. I'm also interested in the same topic. testdisk http://www.howtoforge.com/data_recovery_with_testdisk seems good but haven't tested yet. First of all, make backups regularly. Make the process automated. As for the testdisk, I have used it before and it is AWESOME. The short story is that I screwed up the partition table of my laptop which resulted in an unbootable system. I used testdisk to restore the partition table. All the gory details, screenshots and what not are at my blog http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/2010/08/recover-accidentally- overwritten.html hope that helps -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jouu3b$861$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmdjvxevt7yt6jm2lbohzeykaixfpfubqfyk3ewjhn...@mail.gmail.com
how to practice.
Ok I have been working in IT network field since 7 years and just one and half year back i have started exploring Linux and I believe, someone said to me lately that if you start loving black and white terminal then you will never look back to Windows GUI. I literally can experience this thing at the stage I am standing with Linux. As I consider myself a newbie in Linux but according to my previous experience if i don’t practice I will forget things very easy (as there are tons of commands to remember which I will forget with less or 0 practice). so i am here to ask all the old Pros that how you guys manage to remember all the commands and practice all the previous work. Since after the deployment of some Linux services there is only the log which i have to see for further errors. So how it is possible to keep in my mind all the old stuff and along with that I can move forward with the new goals. Thanks
Re: how to practice.
thanks guys , learned new things and Good tips also. :) On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2012 17:18:20 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: Ok I have been working in IT network field since 7 years and just one and half year back i have started exploring Linux and I believe, someone said to me lately that if you start loving black and white terminal then you will never look back to Windows GUI. I literally can experience this thing at the stage I am standing with Linux. As I consider myself a newbie in Linux but according to my previous experience if i don’t practice I will forget things very easy (as there are tons of commands to remember which I will forget with less or 0 practice). so i am here to ask all the old Pros that how you guys manage to remember all the commands and practice all the previous work. Since after the deployment of some Linux services there is only the log which i have to see for further errors. So how it is possible to keep in my mind all the old stuff and along with that I can move forward with the new goals. Some good ideas in this thread. I too have a search-able directory of notes. Forgot about the flash cards; so, reading this list helps refresh memory. I like to use dwww, which does a good job of searching a term in all installed docs and manuals, of which I install many. -- Regards, Freeman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120520165548.1d44a6f1@Deneb.office -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMk9LNbjgQyAN4K5up89fz1PNgp+N_Zm=vynzala35a...@mail.gmail.com
UID GID issue mapping issue
My OS boot drive was malfunctioning due to which i need to replace it with new one. but now i am facing a problem after configuring my whole NAS box. here is the old gid for a share. 10016 = admin-grp (domain group) now after installing everything when i list the directory it showed me 10016 instead of admin-grp so i thought i can change it by wbinfo command so i remap the 10016 gid to the old sid for admin-grp and set many other like the same way. but after a day. i can see different names as a owner and owner groups like instead of admin-grp i can see developers as an owner of the folder. and i believed that my gid and uid mapping start conflicting. so i tried to reset all the GID and UID and in order to do that i change 1-2 to below idmap uid = 2-4 idmap gid = 2-4 it didnt work. i remove the tdb winbind file. which also didn't resolve the issue. i remap the gid and even tried to remove the mapping still with no results. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmvowwuv61xxsdecn_66ru2qfwbphbbmex6st31kh2...@mail.gmail.com
Re: UID GID issue mapping issue
ok, i manage to reset the gid uid by reinstalling the samba and winbind Thanks. On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: My OS boot drive was malfunctioning due to which i need to replace it with new one. but now i am facing a problem after configuring my whole NAS box. here is the old gid for a share. 10016 = admin-grp (domain group) now after installing everything when i list the directory it showed me 10016 instead of admin-grp so i thought i can change it by wbinfo command so i remap the 10016 gid to the old sid for admin-grp and set many other like the same way. but after a day. i can see different names as a owner and owner groups like instead of admin-grp i can see developers as an owner of the folder. and i believed that my gid and uid mapping start conflicting. so i tried to reset all the GID and UID and in order to do that i change 1-2 to below idmap uid = 2-4 idmap gid = 2-4 it didnt work. i remove the tdb winbind file. which also didn't resolve the issue. i remap the gid and even tried to remove the mapping still with no results. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=g0nwl8tgqaf_z4kcjc_-tz2ntfgw6q7wirzp1pax...@mail.gmail.com
FS rights error with Samba share
i know this is not a place to ask samba related questions but i think File system rights has some thing to do in this problem that is the reason i am asking this question here. please bear with me. Thanks OK, my samba server was working fine i have 2TB RAID1 drive as a storage and had 300gb sata drive for boot the Debian OS 6.0.4. unfortunately my sata boot drive faild and i had to reinstall the OS in new drive. now when i plug the old Raid drives the data was still there. but permissions were a bit messed, it was showing numbers like 100015 or 100016 instead of owning user name or groups. so i did chown root:root * -R i thought that i will reassign the FS rights to every individual folder again. so i did. but now the shares in smb.conf that were working previously now they are throwing error in log files and the same share was working perfectly before. here is the error smbd/service.c:988(make_connection_snum) canonicalize_connect_path failed for service Filesharing, path /nas/backup/Filesharing now i created a new folder on new driver which is the new OS drive. i created a test folder at root my users and i can access either we can create folders and delete here is the folder at /test (we can access it with full rights) drwxrwxrwx 4 admin admin-grp 4096 May 23 19:30 test this folder is on /nas/backup/Filesharing (this is the problem part and many other share like this are not working) drwxrwxrwx 3 admin admin-grp 4096 May 23 19:34 Filesharing [test] comment = test for All path = /test read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 [Filesharing] comment = Filesharing for All path = /nas/backup/Filesharing read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 you can see both shares have same FS rights and same share rights but my users can access /test but not /nas/backup/filesharing and generating this error. smbd/service.c:988(make_connection_snum) canonicalize_connect_path failed for service Filesharing, path /nas/backup/Filesharing however i as admin user can access things in filesharing so i thought that admin is the owner of this folder so i change the ownership of Filesharing folder to a another user and i tested it with that user but still no luck. even thought it doesnt make any sense as 777 is already given to the folder. now i am handicap and nowhere to go. i look for the said error on google on so many places. which shows that it is a File system rights related issue. and according to my knowledge there is nothing to do with FS rights it is some thing different as 777 is already given to both of the folders. here is my [global] workgroup = X realm = X.COM netbios name = nasbox server string = %h server security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes pam password change = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n*Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supd$ unix password sync = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 dns proxy = No panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap uid = 1-4 idmap gid = 1-4 winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes Thanks, MYK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkbfX0WZJ3MbapkNB+Bw-FdcrkTY=6h__2_vd8t96w...@mail.gmail.com
Re: FS rights error with Samba share
Finally Solved.. !!! it is sooo relaxing i have been working on this for 2 days. even i knew it too but mind was not going that way. but now i will remember it till death :) as i have over-googled this matter. Thanks a million :), On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Juan Sierra Pons j...@elsotanillo.net wrote: 2012/5/23 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com: i know this is not a place to ask samba related questions but i think File system rights has some thing to do in this problem that is the reason i am asking this question here. please bear with me. Thanks OK, my samba server was working fine i have 2TB RAID1 drive as a storage and had 300gb sata drive for boot the Debian OS 6.0.4. unfortunately my sata boot drive faild and i had to reinstall the OS in new drive. now when i plug the old Raid drives the data was still there. but permissions were a bit messed, it was showing numbers like 100015 or 100016 instead of owning user name or groups. so i did chown root:root * -R i thought that i will reassign the FS rights to every individual folder again. so i did. but now the shares in smb.conf that were working previously now they are throwing error in log files and the same share was working perfectly before. here is the error smbd/service.c:988(make_connection_snum) canonicalize_connect_path failed for service Filesharing, path /nas/backup/Filesharing now i created a new folder on new driver which is the new OS drive. i created a test folder at root my users and i can access either we can create folders and delete here is the folder at /test (we can access it with full rights) drwxrwxrwx 4 admin admin-grp 4096 May 23 19:30 test this folder is on /nas/backup/Filesharing (this is the problem part and many other share like this are not working) drwxrwxrwx 3 admin admin-grp 4096 May 23 19:34 Filesharing [test] comment = test for All path = /test read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 [Filesharing] comment = Filesharing for All path = /nas/backup/Filesharing read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 you can see both shares have same FS rights and same share rights but my users can access /test but not /nas/backup/filesharing and generating this error. smbd/service.c:988(make_connection_snum) canonicalize_connect_path failed for service Filesharing, path /nas/backup/Filesharing however i as admin user can access things in filesharing so i thought that admin is the owner of this folder so i change the ownership of Filesharing folder to a another user and i tested it with that user but still no luck. even thought it doesnt make any sense as 777 is already given to the folder. now i am handicap and nowhere to go. i look for the said error on google on so many places. which shows that it is a File system rights related issue. and according to my knowledge there is nothing to do with FS rights it is some thing different as 777 is already given to both of the folders. here is my [global] workgroup = X realm = X.COM netbios name = nasbox server string = %h server security = ADS obey pam restrictions = Yes pam password change = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n*Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supd$ unix password sync = Yes syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 dns proxy = No panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap uid = 1-4 idmap gid = 1-4 winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes Thanks, MYK -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMkbfX0WZJ3MbapkNB+Bw-FdcrkTY=6h__2_vd8t96w...@mail.gmail.com Hi in new drive. now when i plug the old Raid drives the data was still there. but permissions were a bit messed, it was showing numbers like 100015 or 100016 instead of owning user name or groups. This ids are normal as you have your Samba server authenticated against a ADS. as you can see in your configuration file: idmap uid = 1-4 idmap gid = 1-4 I think your problem is not with the Filesharing folder permissions but with the path to your Filesharing folder. Have a look to your config file: [test] comment = test for All path = /test read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 test folder is in the root no so problems with the path can happen [Filesharing] comment = Filesharing for All path = /nas/backup/Filesharing read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770
Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc/proc proc defaults0 0 here is my fstab # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # / was on /dev/sda3 during installation UUID=42c02fba-5d23-44d6-b510-5967f61809de / ext3 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /boot was on /dev/sda1 during installation UUID=52f78bea-8afd-4bee-a3b9-2498abceb55f /boot ext3 defaults0 2 # swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation UUID=6baabb6e-ab2d-4bfc-a21a-05ee8a0af001 noneswapsw 0 0 #/dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 the problem line is proc mounting. when i comment this line error disappear.. i haven’t created proc partition during installation. i just created 3 partitions boot, swap and root However the error is gone by commenting the line but i am worried how it going to impact my system and what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmkl9invbtdl8+a5en8pmefphygvduqhowax14spst3...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:40 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 This can't be the cause. The line is correct. what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. The proc file system is a pseudo-file system which is used as an interface to kernel data structures. It is commonly mounted at /proc. - http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc There's an entry in fstab, when /proc is NOT on it's own partition. You also can try proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 ok, after changing it, still facing the same error. however my system is running formal. beside from this failed error. dev / nodev Interpret/do not interpret block special devices on the filesystem. exec / noexec exec lets you execute binaries that are on that partition, whereas noexec does not let you do that. noexec might be useful for a partition that contains no binaries, like /var, or contains binaries you do not want to execute on your system, or that cannot even be executed on your system. Last might be the case of a Windows partition. suid / nosuid Permit/Block the operation of suid, and sgid bits. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fstab Perhaps this prevents against something fishy. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337864550.2247.44.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=_Nhsi43=+kGCybD1S_+CYgu4VRQ=pikoswjjjcsq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:40 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 This can't be the cause. The line is correct. what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. The proc file system is a pseudo-file system which is used as an interface to kernel data structures. It is commonly mounted at /proc. - http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc There's an entry in fstab, when /proc is NOT on it's own partition. You also can try proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 ok, after changing it, still facing the same error. however my system is running formal. beside from this failed error. sorry for the typo, i mean to say my system is running normal. instead of this failed error dev / nodev Interpret/do not interpret block special devices on the filesystem. exec / noexec exec lets you execute binaries that are on that partition, whereas noexec does not let you do that. noexec might be useful for a partition that contains no binaries, like /var, or contains binaries you do not want to execute on your system, or that cannot even be executed on your system. Last might be the case of a Windows partition. suid / nosuid Permit/Block the operation of suid, and sgid bits. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fstab Perhaps this prevents against something fishy. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337864550.2247.44.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=jgL6yziQtq7nV28h4zNpYcPv3+vLiaJrarfUGYƒa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:40 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 This can't be the cause. The line is correct. what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. The proc file system is a pseudo-file system which is used as an interface to kernel data structures. It is commonly mounted at /proc. - http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc There's an entry in fstab, when /proc is NOT on it's own partition. You also can try proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 Kindly check this also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425199 there is some thing with proc mount ok, after changing it, still facing the same error. however my system is running formal. beside from this failed error. sorry for the typo, i mean to say my system is running normal. instead of this failed error dev / nodev Interpret/do not interpret block special devices on the filesystem. exec / noexec exec lets you execute binaries that are on that partition, whereas noexec does not let you do that. noexec might be useful for a partition that contains no binaries, like /var, or contains binaries you do not want to execute on your system, or that cannot even be executed on your system. Last might be the case of a Windows partition. suid / nosuid Permit/Block the operation of suid, and sgid bits. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fstab Perhaps this prevents against something fishy. Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337864550.2247.44.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=tadsl88z8nbgdz97qthhlhaicsye6-+mwkod645p...@mail.gmail.com
Re: FS rights error with Samba share
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2012 09:30:52 +0100, keith wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:14:08 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: Finally Solved.. !!! it is sooo relaxing i have been working on this for 2 days. even i knew it too but mind was not going that way. but now i will remember it till death :) as i have over-googled this matter. Thanks a million :), Don't forget to write it down so that you can find it in 5(?) years time. :) Nah... that never works. By that time the samba team will have completely rewrote their smb stack which will be radically different from the current implementation so the tip you have saved as a treasure will be of no effect and you will be forced to ask all over again, an again, and again... that's known as the curse of the sysadmin secure-saved-tip loop. (just joking ;-P) Greetings, this is more then a treasure to me and specially when you even aware of the problem but you are thinking in a different direction then tips like this are life saving :P being system admin its like life = 24/7 tension you may receive a call from your bosses at night that VPN down or any support call, specially when your customers lives in different time zones and at the top of them all you are the only resource who can resolve the issue. so i am not tense at all even if it is going to happen what you have said, then i will be saving another precious tip from some one. may be, it could b your tip :P -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jplj29$a15$1...@dough.gmane.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmd8LMrXYSM4M=n_wozyesybhz8mof7dfvpqmcn7_4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:57:32PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:40 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 This can't be the cause. The line is correct. what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. The proc file system is a pseudo-file system which is used as an interface to kernel data structures. It is commonly mounted at /proc. - http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc There's an entry in fstab, when /proc is NOT on it's own partition. You also can try proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 Kindly check this also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425199 there is some thing with proc mount This depends on which distribution you are using? Are you on stable, testing, unstable, or something else? If you're on testing or unstable, this bug /should/ be fixed. If it's what I'm thinking it is, the mountkernfs script (and now also the initramfs) mounts proc with the same parameters as are by default in /etc/fstab. If you're on testing/unstable, you could also try initscripts/sysvinit from experimental. The proper solution is to get debian-installer to not create this (useless) /etc/fstab entry in the first place. The only reason the bug is open is because I haven't had proper confirmation it's fixed, so knowing which distribution you're using will be important to know. ok here are the details, root@abc:/etc# cat debian_version 6.0.4 root@abc:/etc# uname -a Linux abc 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmmpb3ombcga6dr4hqopnuvp9nm-lg+75dkowcxujzv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 19:57 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: Kindly check this also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425199 there is some thing with proc mount Subject: Re: Bug#425199: Mounting local filesystems... Failed! Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:04:55 + Is it an issue with initscripts in current testing/unstable? I've updated the mountall shell functions to merge initscripts defaults with matching fstab entries, so both should be supported equally well now, and this should have solved this bug. So there was a bug in January? It was solved? And appears now again? :( You should file a bug report. i am not sure if it is a bug or my mistake as i am new to linux. i think i should verify at my end first instead of reporting false bug :) - Ralf -- PS: For me it's ok, if you carbon copy, but it's not wanted for the mailing list. You should sent replies to the list only. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337926071.2251.6.camel@precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfMmbhGhy8dEXb_TDuHFcNrZRjgen_N=mopjqpfqp4wz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mounting local filesystem failed on boot
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:38:08AM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 07:57:32PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 17:40 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: i am getting Mounting local filesystem failed on every boot. and the problem line in fstab is proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 This can't be the cause. The line is correct. what this proc mount is for. as i haven’t created it. The proc file system is a pseudo-file system which is used as an interface to kernel data structures. It is commonly mounted at /proc. - http://linux.die.net/man/5/proc There's an entry in fstab, when /proc is NOT on it's own partition. You also can try proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 Kindly check this also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425199 there is some thing with proc mount This depends on which distribution you are using? Are you on stable, testing, unstable, or something else? ok here are the details, root@abc:/etc# cat debian_version 6.0.4 OK, so this is stable. It should be fixed in testing and unstable now. I also filed a bug to remove it from fstab for new installs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674481 thanks, so does it means that, i should comment the proc mount in /etc/fstab, and it is safe Thanks, Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAGWVfM=1qbugbenbwtgun49nbca5eok5x_kf6pmcsqhjio7...@mail.gmail.com