Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Matej Horvat
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:44:52 +0100, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@twc.com  
wrote:

 from Rugxulo:

 One of the big problems (not counting HTML5 or Javascript or Flash) is
 HTTPS. Not just for DOS but for any OS that isn't top tier (big three:
 Mac, Win, Linux).

On DOS, Dillo and Links support HTTPS.

 Even the lighter-weight graphic web browsers for Linux/Unix support
 Javascript and HTTPS, Mozilla Firefox and Seamonkey, and maybe some
 others, also support HTML5, but Flash is a big problem.

I do not understand why everyone is so deathly afraid of HTML5. HTML5  
pages do not magically stop working in HTML 4.01 browsers. HTML5 just adds  
some new elements, many of which are semantic and can be ignored when  
rendering a page.

Usually when people say HTML5, they mean the audio and video elements,  
which currently no DOS browser supports. They are a _good_ thing. They  
make it possible to include audio and video without relying on proprietary  
technologies such as Flash (which fortunately hardly any site requires  
anymore, probably because of iOS's popularity).

In fact, I am sure Arachne could easily support them by just rendering  
them as a link and then downloading the audio/video file and starting the  
appropriate program, like it already does. The audio and video  
elements pretty much are just an extended version of the old a element  
that support specifying multiple formats so the browser can choose one  
depending on what it supports.

Of course, the bigger problem is that nobody really works on Arachne  
anymore (and I'm not blaming anyone).

 I've thought of buying a cheap refurbished SATA hard drive, maybe 80 GB
 or 160 GB, to install FreeDOS and ReactOS, and maybe OpenBSD in the
 remaining space, using MBR, but FreeDOS and ReactOS might be bitchy
 about having to be on the first partition, and then there is the
 limitation on FAT32 partition size; 4 KB cluster size goes up to 8GB.

I don't know for ReactOS, but FreeDOS is perfectly fine with not being on  
the first partition. I have it installed on a disk which also has an NTFS  
and a BFS (Haiku) partition and everything works as it should.

Why is cluster size a problem? If you have such a large disk then you  
probably don't care about wasting more than 4K on a small file. And it's  
not like [Free]DOS really requires more than a few megabytes anyway.

According to Wikipedia, FAT32 can support partitions up to 2 TB with  
512-byte sectors, or 16 TB with 4K sectors, but I think Windows won't let  
you create a partition of that size.

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Don Flowers
I have used the boot manager from XFdisk or Grub 2 and have installed
FreeDOS on the 2nd, 3rd and/or last partition following the three (root,
home  swap) that the ubuntu derivatives require. The the minimum FreeDOS
FAT32 partition I have used is 4GB, the max is about 40gb (on a 320gb
drive) the average installation is 2gb for a DOS/WIN 3.1 installation, 12GB
for FreeDOS (on which most old DOS downloads are stored). I am sure as long
as you have some manager that is capable of the 3-4 primary partitions,
that your desired setup will work fine.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Matej Horvat matej.hor...@guest.arnes.si
wrote:

 On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:44:52 +0100, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@twc.com
 wrote:

  from Rugxulo:
 
  One of the big problems (not counting HTML5 or Javascript or Flash) is
  HTTPS. Not just for DOS but for any OS that isn't top tier (big three:
  Mac, Win, Linux).

 On DOS, Dillo and Links support HTTPS.

  Even the lighter-weight graphic web browsers for Linux/Unix support
  Javascript and HTTPS, Mozilla Firefox and Seamonkey, and maybe some
  others, also support HTML5, but Flash is a big problem.

 I do not understand why everyone is so deathly afraid of HTML5. HTML5
 pages do not magically stop working in HTML 4.01 browsers. HTML5 just adds
 some new elements, many of which are semantic and can be ignored when
 rendering a page.

 Usually when people say HTML5, they mean the audio and video elements,
 which currently no DOS browser supports. They are a _good_ thing. They
 make it possible to include audio and video without relying on proprietary
 technologies such as Flash (which fortunately hardly any site requires
 anymore, probably because of iOS's popularity).

 In fact, I am sure Arachne could easily support them by just rendering
 them as a link and then downloading the audio/video file and starting the
 appropriate program, like it already does. The audio and video
 elements pretty much are just an extended version of the old a element
 that support specifying multiple formats so the browser can choose one
 depending on what it supports.

 Of course, the bigger problem is that nobody really works on Arachne
 anymore (and I'm not blaming anyone).

  I've thought of buying a cheap refurbished SATA hard drive, maybe 80 GB
  or 160 GB, to install FreeDOS and ReactOS, and maybe OpenBSD in the
  remaining space, using MBR, but FreeDOS and ReactOS might be bitchy
  about having to be on the first partition, and then there is the
  limitation on FAT32 partition size; 4 KB cluster size goes up to 8GB.

 I don't know for ReactOS, but FreeDOS is perfectly fine with not being on
 the first partition. I have it installed on a disk which also has an NTFS
 and a BFS (Haiku) partition and everything works as it should.

 Why is cluster size a problem? If you have such a large disk then you
 probably don't care about wasting more than 4K on a small file. And it's
 not like [Free]DOS really requires more than a few megabytes anyway.

 According to Wikipedia, FAT32 can support partitions up to 2 TB with
 512-byte sectors, or 16 TB with 4K sectors, but I think Windows won't let
 you create a partition of that size.


 --
 Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
 from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
 with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
 Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE

 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Dale E Sterner
FAT16 is limited to 8 gigs but FAT32 goes much higher. I kinda remember
Wikopedia saying 2T but could easily be wrong.
DOS might have problems with SATA drive. DOS reads from the harddrive a
lot.
Since SATA is serial (just one bit at a time) The data ransfer rate might
be too
slow for DOS to live with. I know I can't get it to run on a SD card
because
one bit at a time is just too slow. You won't know until you try it.

cheers
DS

On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:44:52 + Thomas Mueller mueller6...@twc.com
writes:
 from Rugxulo:
 
  One of the big problems (not counting HTML5 or Javascript or 
 Flash) is
  HTTPS. Not just for DOS but for any OS that isn't top tier (big 
 three:
  Mac, Win, Linux).
 
  It has recently come to my attention that many popular websites 
 are
  now requiring it, which makes it very hard to operate unless your 
 web
  browser can support it. And, in case it wasn't obvious, there are 
 only
  a handful of modern web browsers (and host OSes) that work for 
 such
  modern needs. Thus, anything that isn't top tier (Firefox, 
 Chrome,
  IE, Safari) is practically ignored / banned. And even some of 
 those
  are struggling.
 
  We're lucky just to have anything that halfway works anymore 
 (mTCP,
  Dillo, Links, Arachne).
 
 Even the lighter-weight graphic web browsers for Linux/Unix support 
 Javascript and HTTPS, Mozilla Firefox and Seamonkey, and maybe some 
 others, also support HTML5, but Flash is a big problem.
 
 Mozilla Firefox and Seamonkey run on BSD as well as Linux.  FreeBSD 
 ports also includes Netsurf, Qupzilla, Midori and Epiphany; KDE 
 includes Konqueror; Javascript and HTTPS are supported.
 
 I never downloaded the newest Arachne from March 2013 for lack of 
 ability to run it.
 
 I notice Net-Tamer for DOS hasn't been updated since 1999; even 
 Netscape and Internet Explorer from that time would be very limited 
 in function.
 
 from Dale E Sterner:
 
  According to wikopedia GPT is a king sized version of  MBR.
  Can you try a smaller hardrive that uses a MBR? If your bios can 
 still
  boot a hard drive with a MBR.
 
 I've thought of buying a cheap refurbished SATA hard drive, maybe 80 
 GB or 160 GB, to install FreeDOS and ReactOS, and maybe OpenBSD in 
 the remaining space, using MBR, but FreeDOS and ReactOS might be 
 bitchy about having to be on the first partition, and then there is 
 the limitation on FAT32 partition size; 4 KB cluster size goes up to 
 8GB.
 
 Tom
 
 

-
-
 Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
 from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and 
 Dashboards
 with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  
 more
 Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, 
 FREE

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clk
trk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
 
 Protect what matters
 Floods can happen anywhere. Learn your risk and find an agent today.
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3165/547dca98c3c564a955165mp05duc
 


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Tom Ehlert
 DOS might have problems with SATA drive. DOS reads from the harddrive a
 lot.
 Since SATA is serial (just one bit at a time) The data ransfer rate might
 be too slow for DOS to live with. I know I can't get it to run on a SD card
 because one bit at a time is just too slow.


back in the good old times, when DOS was popular, PATA disk drives used PIO
for transfer, which is limited to (less then) 8 MB/sec.

currently, SATA hard disks transfer up to 120 MB/sec and SATA SSDs
transfer ~500 MB/sec.

this should be fast enough even for DOS.

 You won't know until you try it.
I don't have the faintest idea what you are doing wrong, but you are doing
it the wrong anyway.

Tom



--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread dmccunney
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com wrote:
 FAT16 is limited to 8 gigs but FAT32 goes much higher. I kinda remember
 Wikopedia saying 2T but could easily be wrong.

FAT16 is limited to a 2GB volume size.  FAT32  goes up to 8TB.

In FAT*, the basic unit of space it the cluster, and there will be a
limit on the number of clusters.  Each cluster must have a unique
address.

FAT16 uses a 16 bit cluster address, so there are 65,536 possible
clusters.  The maximum size a cluster can be is 32KB.  65,536 x 32KB =
2,097,152 bytes

FAT32 uses a 32 bit cluster address, so there are  268,435,445
possible clusters.  Again,  the maximum size a cluster can be is 32KB.
268,435,445 x 32KB =  8,589,934,240 bytes

If you are trying to format the drive as FAT32 from within Windows,
there may be limitations on volume size imposed by the MS format
utility.

 DOS might have problems with SATA drive. DOS reads from the harddrive a
 lot. Since SATA is serial (just one bit at a time) The data ransfer rate might
 be too  slow for DOS to live with.

You really need to update your knowledge.

While it seems counter-intuitive, current SATA drives are much
*faster* than IDE drives, with higher data transfer rates.  *Getting*
that throughput was a major reason behind the shift to SATA.

 I know I can't get it to run on a SD card because  one bit at a time is just 
 too
 slow. You won't know until you try it.

SATA != SD.

There is no reason inherent to the card why SD should be slower than
CF.  In fact, the reverse is generally true.

Variables will include native card speed (some SD cards are faster
than others), the adapter you are using, and the host hardware and OS.
I've run stuff from SD cards here just fine.

 cheers
 DS
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Mateusz Viste
This is getting highly off-topic, but I couldn't resist commenting on. :)

On 12/02/2014 05:02 PM, dmccunney wrote:
 FAT32 uses a 32 bit cluster address, so there are  268,435,445
 possible clusters.

The above statement might sound confusing for the occasional reader. To 
straighten things up: FAT32 actually uses 28 bit cluster addresses (that 
it stores inside 32 bit blocks, but this is irrelevant for the subject 
discussed), which gives us 2^28 possible clusters (268'435'456).

Mateusz

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread dmccunney
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
 This is getting highly off-topic, but I couldn't resist commenting on. :)

 On 12/02/2014 05:02 PM, dmccunney wrote:
 FAT32 uses a 32 bit cluster address, so there are  268,435,445
 possible clusters.

 The above statement might sound confusing for the occasional reader. To
 straighten things up: FAT32 actually uses 28 bit cluster addresses (that
 it stores inside 32 bit blocks, but this is irrelevant for the subject
 discussed), which gives us 2^28 possible clusters (268'435'456).

True, and thanks for the correction.

 Mateusz
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] Quickview 2.60 (digressions)

2014-12-02 Thread Jose Antonio Senna
 On the matter of browsers for DOS, Lynx, which I am using now,
supports https and has done so for 10+ years. What is not 
available in any DOS browser is javascript. Much of javascript
in web pages is to load and reload advertising, which I don't
miss at all. However, the (action) in many html forms nowadays 
is not a remote URL but a local javascript, that checks and
reformats the data before submitting it to the remote. This is
where I really  miss javascript support.
JAS


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Dale E Sterner
Serial devices are always slow; I don't know how they get around it.
SD cards are serial like SATA and they really are slow. The hard drive
clock must be super fast to get those speeds. They also have to transfer
handshakes serially. I wonder how its done. Some really great
engineering there.

cheers
DS


On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 17:00:49 +0100 Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de
writes:
  DOS might have problems with SATA drive. DOS reads from the 
 harddrive a
  lot.
  Since SATA is serial (just one bit at a time) The data ransfer 
 rate might
  be too slow for DOS to live with. I know I can't get it to run on 
 a SD card
  because one bit at a time is just too slow.
 
 
 back in the good old times, when DOS was popular, PATA disk drives 
 used PIO
 for transfer, which is limited to (less then) 8 MB/sec.
 
 currently, SATA hard disks transfer up to 120 MB/sec and SATA SSDs
 transfer ~500 MB/sec.
 
 this should be fast enough even for DOS.
 
  You won't know until you try it.
 I don't have the faintest idea what you are doing wrong, but you are 
 doing
 it the wrong anyway.
 
 Tom
 
 
 

-
-
 Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
 from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and 
 Dashboards
 with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  
 more
 Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, 
 FREE

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clk
trk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
 
 $1,200 Instant #34;Dividend#34;
 This woman collects $1,200 instant dividends with just a few mouse 
 clicks
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3165/547e5da564e3f5da53787mp06duc
 


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Dale E Sterner
Tranferings 1 bit at a time is always slower than 8 bits at a time.
if the clock stays the same for both. How SATA beats this 
is something I don't understand. SATA doesn't have seperate
handshaking outputs so handshkes have to travel the same serial lines.
Quit a feat of engineering there. When I try to format very large SD
chips 
with DOS; the software just gives up. Small sd chips do format but
slowly.
Large CF chips format in a few seconds.

cheers
DS..


On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:02:56 -0500 dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
writes:
 On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com 
 wrote:
  FAT16 is limited to 8 gigs but FAT32 goes much higher. I kinda 
 remember
  Wikopedia saying 2T but could easily be wrong.
 
 FAT16 is limited to a 2GB volume size.  FAT32  goes up to 8TB.
 
 In FAT*, the basic unit of space it the cluster, and there will be a
 limit on the number of clusters.  Each cluster must have a unique
 address.
 
 FAT16 uses a 16 bit cluster address, so there are 65,536 possible
 clusters.  The maximum size a cluster can be is 32KB.  65,536 x 32KB 
 =
 2,097,152 bytes
 
 FAT32 uses a 32 bit cluster address, so there are  268,435,445
 possible clusters.  Again,  the maximum size a cluster can be is 
 32KB.
 268,435,445 x 32KB =  8,589,934,240 bytes
 
 If you are trying to format the drive as FAT32 from within Windows,
 there may be limitations on volume size imposed by the MS format
 utility.
 
  DOS might have problems with SATA drive. DOS reads from the 
 harddrive a
  lot. Since SATA is serial (just one bit at a time) The data 
 ransfer rate might
  be too  slow for DOS to live with.
 
 You really need to update your knowledge.
 
 While it seems counter-intuitive, current SATA drives are much
 *faster* than IDE drives, with higher data transfer rates.  
 *Getting*
 that throughput was a major reason behind the shift to SATA.
 
  I know I can't get it to run on a SD card because  one bit at a 
 time is just too
  slow. You won't know until you try it.
 
 SATA != SD.
 
 There is no reason inherent to the card why SD should be slower than
 CF.  In fact, the reverse is generally true.
 
 Variables will include native card speed (some SD cards are faster
 than others), the adapter you are using, and the host hardware and 
 OS.
 I've run stuff from SD cards here just fine.
 
  cheers
  DS
 __
 Dennis
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
 

-
-
 Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
 from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and 
 Dashboards
 with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  
 more
 Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, 
 FREE

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751iu=/4140/ostg.clk
trk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
 
 Buffett#39;s Top 5 Stocks
 Go here to get Buffett#39;s Top 5 Stocks, plus his 16 latest buys, 
 FREE
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3165/547e5da58ec6f5da53787mp06duc
 


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread dmccunney
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com wrote:
 Tranferings 1 bit at a time is always slower than 8 bits at a time.
 if the clock stays the same for both. How SATA beats this
 is something I don't understand. SATA doesn't have seperate
 handshaking outputs so handshkes have to travel the same serial lines.
 Quit a feat of engineering there.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA

Did you stop learning about the technology once you learned enough
about DOS to do what you wanted?  A lot of what you post here seems to
be based on 25 year old ideas about how this stuff works.  The
technology has progressed a bit, and you seem to be making assumptions
that may not be true for current hardware and OSes.

 When I try to format very large SD chips with DOS; the software just gives 
 up. Small sd
 chips do format but slowly. Large CF chips format in a few seconds.

That's an OS and old hardware issue,  It's not inherent to SD.

And it's not clear why you would *need* to format an SD card of any
size.  Depending on volume size, they come formatted as FAT16 or
FAT32.  I've formatted them for other reasons, like using a Linux ext3
file system or NTFS.  I put the card into an SD adapter and do the
format from my desktop machine.  It's quite quick, thanks.

 cheers
 DS..
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread Dale E Sterner
I can think of only 2 ways an engineer can get those speeds out of a
serial device.
A very fast clock or big external buffers. I think DOS could handle a
fast clock
but if they use buffers; DOS may not know how to use them like windows or
Linux.
I never used SATA so I can't say. You would be in good position to know.
As far as formating an SD chip; sometimes the format gets corrupted and
you need
to redo it. DOS just doesn't do well on the big stuff; no problem ever
with cf chips.

cheers
DS



On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:54:49 -0500 dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
writes:
 On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com 
 wrote:
  Tranferings 1 bit at a time is always slower than 8 bits at a 
 time.
  if the clock stays the same for both. How SATA beats this
  is something I don't understand. SATA doesn't have seperate
  handshaking outputs so handshkes have to travel the same serial 
 lines.
  Quit a feat of engineering there.
 
 See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_ATA
 
 Did you stop learning about the technology once you learned enough
 about DOS to do what you wanted?  A lot of what you post here seems 
 to
 be based on 25 year old ideas about how this stuff works.  The
 technology has progressed a bit, and you seem to be making 
 assumptions
 that may not be true for current hardware and OSes.
 
  When I try to format very large SD chips with DOS; the software 
 just gives up. Small sd
  chips do format but slowly. Large CF chips format in a few 
 seconds.
 
 That's an OS and old hardware issue,  It's not inherent to SD.
 
 And it's not clear why you would *need* to format an SD card of any
 size.  Depending on volume size, they come formatted as FAT16 or
 FAT32.  I've formatted them for other reasons, like using a Linux 
 ext3
 file system or NTFS.  I put the card into an SD adapter and do the
 format from my desktop machine.  It's quite quick, thanks.
 
  cheers
  DS..
 __
 Dennis
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
 

-
-
 Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
 from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and 
 Dashboards
 with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  
 more
 Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, 
 FREE

http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clk
trk
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
 
 Are YOU Dumb?
 Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? 79% Of Users Failed This Quiz!
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3165/547e6e549e1766e5422demp01duc
 


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview 2.60 (digressions)

2014-12-02 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Jose Antonio Senna
jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br wrote:

  On the matter of browsers for DOS, Lynx, which I am using now,
 supports https and has done so for 10+ years. What is not
 available in any DOS browser is javascript. Much of javascript
 in web pages is to load and reload advertising, which I don't
 miss at all. However, the (action) in many html forms nowadays
 is not a remote URL but a local javascript, that checks and
 reformats the data before submitting it to the remote. This is
 where I really  miss javascript support.

It was reported recently that SourceForge has changed the way they
allow subscriptions to their email lists. So one guy with an old setup
suddenly couldn't subscribe because his (old Opera) web browser
couldn't validate certificates (or something weird like that). And
then I went way down the rabbit hole trying to help him find a lite
Linux liveCD for his old Athlon computer, but it doesn't sound like
there's a perfect answer since even Firefox requires SSE2 these days.

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread TJ Edmister
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:13:59 -0500, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com  
wrote:

 I can think of only 2 ways an engineer can get those speeds out of a
 serial device.
 A very fast clock or big external buffers. I think DOS could handle a
 fast clock

It is a very fast clock, 1.5 GHz and beyond. It uses differential  
signaling (two wires to transmit one bit) which is less vulnerable to  
noise.

The IDE interface could not run at such a high frequency because it uses  
5V TTL signaling, like an old motherboard bus (or parallel printer port).  
Except where a motherboard has multiple layers with a ground plane and  
whatnot to control noise, a ribbon cable doesn't. The 80-conductor ribbon  
cables have extra ground wires to improve signal integrity and allowed the  
speed to increase from 16.6MHz (ATA 33) to 66MHz (ATA 133). The original  
speed for the IDE interface was 1.66MHz (PIO 0).

Hypothetically, they could have used high-speed differential signaling AND  
a connector with multiple bits in parallel for even more speed. This is  
basically what a PCI-express graphics slot is.

 but if they use buffers; DOS may not know how to use them like windows or
 Linux.
 I never used SATA so I can't say. You would be in good position to know.
 As far as formating an SD chip; sometimes the format gets corrupted and
 you need
 to redo it. DOS just doesn't do well on the big stuff; no problem ever
 with cf chips.


The DOS format utility is kind of an anachronism at this point. Usually it  
takes a long time to format a partition because it's iterating through  
every sector of the disk. It's completely unnecessary these days. All it  
really needs to do is write a boot sector, FAT, and root directory.


--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Quickview ver 2.60

2014-12-02 Thread TJ Edmister
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:55:59 -0500, Matej Horvat  
matej.hor...@guest.arnes.si wrote:

 On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:44:52 +0100, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@twc.com
 wrote:

 from Rugxulo:

 One of the big problems (not counting HTML5 or Javascript or Flash) is
 HTTPS. Not just for DOS but for any OS that isn't top tier (big three:
 Mac, Win, Linux).

 On DOS, Dillo and Links support HTTPS.

 Even the lighter-weight graphic web browsers for Linux/Unix support
 Javascript and HTTPS, Mozilla Firefox and Seamonkey, and maybe some
 others, also support HTML5, but Flash is a big problem.

 I do not understand why everyone is so deathly afraid of HTML5. HTML5
 pages do not magically stop working in HTML 4.01 browsers. HTML5 just  
 adds
 some new elements, many of which are semantic and can be ignored when
 rendering a page.

According to wiki, HTML 4.01 dates back to 2001, so technically there are  
huge number of HTML 4.01 browsers when including the various versions  
released since 2001. CSS is probably the biggest reason for websites not  
working right in any case. Some sites are completely reliant on Javascript  
and are useless otherwise, but I have seen a few that will still work  
right in an old browser. Tons and tons of sites don't render properly or  
at all, with or without JS, because of CSS issues. Sometimes I go into a  
page's source code and delete or edit sections to make it display.


 Usually when people say HTML5, they mean the audio and video  
 elements,
 which currently no DOS browser supports. They are a _good_ thing. They
 make it possible to include audio and video without relying on  
 proprietary
 technologies such as Flash (which fortunately hardly any site requires
 anymore, probably because of iOS's popularity).

 In fact, I am sure Arachne could easily support them by just rendering
 them as a link and then downloading the audio/video file and starting the
 appropriate program, like it already does. The audio and video
 elements pretty much are just an extended version of the old a element
 that support specifying multiple formats so the browser can choose one
 depending on what it supports.

Haha. A simple link to an audio or video file? But that's exactly what the  
site operators don't want, or they could have done it in the first place.  
It would be way too easy.

In Opera version 4, one could click a link to an AVI file and it would  
download and play in the browser window. Of course, since an AVI file has  
the index chunk at the end, the whole thing had to transfer before  
playback could begin.

--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration  more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user