RE: [NTSysADM] Added second IP to NIC, Radius fails
I pointed my AP's at the new IP (old one is still there and they can ping it) and it started working. Thanks From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 12:47 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Added second IP to NIC, Radius fails I wish my memory was better. hazard of getting old. I've seen this before, and I believe it had to do with the fact that the IP address that Windows uses for IP transmissions is non-deterministic and was no longer working because the new IP address wasn't recognized on the source device. But your problem may be completely different. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 10:35 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] Added second IP to NIC, Radius fails Any idea why this would happen? I've checked all the policy rules, there's nothing tying them to a specific IP. I've bounced the IAS service.
[NTSysADM] Suggestions for small Industrial Switches
Looking for Moxa type industrial switches for use in weatherproof outdoor enclosures where temps can be subzero to baking in the sun. SM/MM fiber back hauls to Cisco switches. Managed 802.1q, POE, 10/100/1000 or at least option for 1Gb fiber backhaul. Mainly used for AP's and Camera's. If you tell me Moxa is the best I can do then fine, I'll spend the $.
RE: [NTSysADM] XP issue after Forefront update
Microsoft released a botched update, it killed every XP workstation we have and wasn’t nice to 2003 servers either. We are running SCCM and SCEP 2010. Go figure the week after support ends they decide to break it. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Lemmiksoo Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:08 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] XP issue after Forefront update After last nights ForeFront update our XP machines will not work. Have anyone else experienced this. -- T. Todd Lemmiksoo
[NTSysADM] RE: Lync Wireless phone question
We have a bunch of 8440's and before those we had older model PTX150's. But we don't use Lync, at least not with these yet. I have them as standard SIP devices on my Mitel 5000. Once you get a tftp server properly set up with the phone configs you can config and launch them as fast as you can copy and paste. Our only bad experience with them is the fact we are a manufacturing environment with a lot of metallic dust and shavings. The phones didn't have any kind of protective cover over the ringer/speakerphone speaker and the ear speaker. We were killing the speakers with magnetic particles within weeks. Spectralink worked with us and came up with a fix to protect the speakers and replaced all our phones. We had the same problem with the older 150's and I can't believe they designed a new phone and totally forgot to fix that problem. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Greg Olson Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:15 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] Lync Wireless phone question Hi All, I was wondering what experiences any of you have with Wireless phones for Lync (2010 or 2013)? I only seem to be able to find one Certified phone, the Polycom Spectralink 8440 series. It's a bit pricey though at 550.00 plus with a charger kit. I do see some other phones that seem to work with Lync, but have to have a server and usually other access points to translate between them and Lync, or there is something like the Snom M9 which seems to be like the Polycom 8440 type of phone, but not certified? None of these also seems to be Optimized for Lync either, but I guess that's just a limitation we'll have to live with for now. Anyone have any good or bad experiences with these, or other wireless phones for Lync? Thanks for your thoughts and advice in advance. -Greg
[NTSysADM] RE: Folders without access visible again
Thanks guys, my googlefu was failing me. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 9:31 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Folders without access visible again http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd772681(v=ws.10).aspx From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 10:20 AM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] Folders without access visible again Over the weekend I robocopied a share to a new volume on an 08r2 server. Now folders that users don't have access to are populating for them. Security is fine, users can't get to them but why would they show back up? Did I miss a switch in robocopy perhaps? Thanks
RE: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?)
I have a TS-659 Pro II home and at work. I've used them for SMB (AD authentication) and ISCSI targets. I just moved iSCSI off the one at work now that we have another EQ. It's mainly used as a backup target now and for any kind of bulk storage users need. I still use the one at home for my VMWare iSCSI target and file storage. One NIC dedicated to iSCSI traffic and the other to LAN. Also use the built in twonkey media server for streaming movies to google tv devices, etc. The latest firmware totally re-did the dashboard. It's much faster. I would suggest you get a model with an intel CPU, it's a significant speed increase. Even with browsing files. And make sure you pick HD's off their compatibility list. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] NAS SMB server (QNAP?) SHORT VERSION Anyone here used the QNAP appliances as an SMB file server (Windows File Sharing) in an Active Directory environment? How'd it go? (Not as an iSCSI target or other block-level protocol.) LONG VERSION I'm looking for what will basically be a network-attached disk drive. Non-critical file storage for things like ISO images, hard disk images, archives of old user files, installation sources, that sort of thing. SMB will be the protocol. Clients will be Win 7, XP, and that one Win 2000 computer I just can't get rid of. Permissions will be pretty simple, basically a couple of groups, read-only/read-write/none, pull from and authenticate to our Active Directory. No interest in running any applications on the box, nor doing anything more than file copies to/from it. We're not going to be running application off it (unless you count installers). No block level protocols like iSATA, ATA-over-Ethernet, etc. Hardware will be twin mirrored 4TB disks, maybe a third sometimes gets attached to make an offline backup. Rack mount. One option would be a Dell R210-II running CentOS Linux, Linux kernel software RAID, Samba, etc. I've done that before. It works. But management here is concerned that good Linux people are harder to find than Windows people. They don't like that my minions don't have expertise with such systems. So I'm considering something that comes with a bit more hand-holding, a bit more ready-to-go, out-of-the-box. And NAS hardware can be cheaper than general-purpose server hardware. Specifically, I'm looking at the QNAP TS-412U. Four bays, what looks like a decent web UI, claims to do Active Directory integration. All sorts of flashy bells and whistles we'll never use, but oh well. It's significantly cheaper than most rack-mount general-purpose servers will be. But if their SMB stuff is borken (I presume they're using Samba, but how you configure Samba matters a lot), it's no good to me. Thoughts/suggestions/experiences/etc. welcomed. -- Ben
[NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2
Following up with some results and another question. I added a second CPU, it helped but didn't solve the problem. After some more digging with Process Explorer it seems the culprit is the SMB 2.0 driver. It's chewing up the CPU but only with my Win7 clients. This article suggests in mixed client environments try disabling SMB 2 on the server and clients. Haven't done it yet. Anyone else experience issues related to the SMB 2 driver? It would explain why my Win XP clients don't experience the same issues as my Win 7. http://www.petri.co.il/how-to-disable-smb-2-on-windows-vista-or-server-2008.htm# -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:35 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 Capturing a dump of the system when the problem is occurring or collecting an xperf trace would be my approaches to start. 1 CPU is not really a great setup here. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:07 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 Only questions I didn't already answer are ~100 sessions 5 shares Virtual (same config as other file servers that don't experience this) 1 CPU Something else to add is I am snapping for previous file versions but CPU spikes never seem to coincide.I tend to agree it's something with the NIC because when System is spiking the CPU it's also the process with the highest network activity. And then it's only 2-4% utilization. There's not much I can do about that other than change the NIC type of the VM, but again it's using the same virtual adapter as my other file servers. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Rink Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:45 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 what version OS is the server? nothing at all running on it other than a couple folder shares? how many users are hitting the box? how often is the spiking occuring? is it a virtual or physical box? how many cpu's or vcpus? have you tried updating the NIC driver on the server? does the cpu spike settle down on its own after awhile or do you have to reboot the client(s) and/or server? Just thinking out loud... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of N Parr [npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:24 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] System process 100% CPU 08r2 I've been troubleshooting this for months now and I'm not getting anywhere but more confused. I have one file server that keeps spiking the system service at random times. Nothing else is running on the server, no AV or other apps. When this happens my win7 clients trying to access files on that server will come to a screeching halt. That's the really strange part, my XP clients keep working like nothing is wrong. I've done all the trouble shooting I can find for this problem, it's very hard to narrow down exactly what's causing the system process to spike. I noticed that one of the win7 clients in particular was moving a lot of data (receiving .5 MB/sec steady) but they had no apps running off the server, weren't searching, search service was turned off. But on that client it was the system service that was receiving the data from that server. I rebooted the client and the server cpu immediately went back to normal. My googling can't find anything that links the two together. Just hoping someone else has encountered this. Both client and server are patched but this has been going on for a long time, at least the last couple years. Thanks
[NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2
It's VMware. On Dell 620 hosts -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Glen Johnson Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:52 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 Also, if Hyper-V you might want to check the host network adapter, disable Virtual Machine Queues. We saw horribly slow network transfers if they are enabled on the host nic that is used by the VMs. This was on Server 2012 host OS, nic is Broadcom. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Rink Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 5:49 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 just out of curiosity, you mention the VM is virtual.. is it hyper-v or vsphere? if hyper-v, are you doing any kind of port-bonding (aggregation) using the HP Networking Team configuration on the host itself. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of N Parr [npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:06 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 Only questions I didn't already answer are ~100 sessions 5 shares Virtual (same config as other file servers that don't experience this) 1 CPU Something else to add is I am snapping for previous file versions but CPU spikes never seem to coincide.I tend to agree it's something with the NIC because when System is spiking the CPU it's also the process with the highest network activity. And then it's only 2-4% utilization. There's not much I can do about that other than change the NIC type of the VM, but again it's using the same virtual adapter as my other file servers. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Rink Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:45 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 what version OS is the server? nothing at all running on it other than a couple folder shares? how many users are hitting the box? how often is the spiking occuring? is it a virtual or physical box? how many cpu's or vcpus? have you tried updating the NIC driver on the server? does the cpu spike settle down on its own after awhile or do you have to reboot the client(s) and/or server? Just thinking out loud... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of N Parr [npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:24 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] System process 100% CPU 08r2 I've been troubleshooting this for months now and I'm not getting anywhere but more confused. I have one file server that keeps spiking the system service at random times. Nothing else is running on the server, no AV or other apps. When this happens my win7 clients trying to access files on that server will come to a screeching halt. That's the really strange part, my XP clients keep working like nothing is wrong. I've done all the trouble shooting I can find for this problem, it's very hard to narrow down exactly what's causing the system process to spike. I noticed that one of the win7 clients in particular was moving a lot of data (receiving .5 MB/sec steady) but they had no apps running off the server, weren't searching, search service was turned off. But on that client it was the system service that was receiving the data from that server. I rebooted the client and the server cpu immediately went back to normal. My googling can't find anything that links the two together. Just hoping someone else has encountered this. Both client and server are patched but this has been going on for a long time, at least the last couple years. Thanks
[NTSysADM] System process 100% CPU 08r2
I've been troubleshooting this for months now and I'm not getting anywhere but more confused. I have one file server that keeps spiking the system service at random times. Nothing else is running on the server, no AV or other apps. When this happens my win7 clients trying to access files on that server will come to a screeching halt. That's the really strange part, my XP clients keep working like nothing is wrong. I've done all the trouble shooting I can find for this problem, it's very hard to narrow down exactly what's causing the system process to spike. I noticed that one of the win7 clients in particular was moving a lot of data (receiving .5 MB/sec steady) but they had no apps running off the server, weren't searching, search service was turned off. But on that client it was the system service that was receiving the data from that server. I rebooted the client and the server cpu immediately went back to normal. My googling can't find anything that links the two together. Just hoping someone else has encountered this. Both client and server are patched but this has been going on for a long time, at least the last couple years. Thanks
[NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2
Only questions I didn't already answer are ~100 sessions 5 shares Virtual (same config as other file servers that don't experience this) 1 CPU Something else to add is I am snapping for previous file versions but CPU spikes never seem to coincide.I tend to agree it's something with the NIC because when System is spiking the CPU it's also the process with the highest network activity. And then it's only 2-4% utilization. There's not much I can do about that other than change the NIC type of the VM, but again it's using the same virtual adapter as my other file servers. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Rink Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:45 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: System process 100% CPU 08r2 what version OS is the server? nothing at all running on it other than a couple folder shares? how many users are hitting the box? how often is the spiking occuring? is it a virtual or physical box? how many cpu's or vcpus? have you tried updating the NIC driver on the server? does the cpu spike settle down on its own after awhile or do you have to reboot the client(s) and/or server? Just thinking out loud... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf of N Parr [npar...@mortonind.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:24 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] System process 100% CPU 08r2 I've been troubleshooting this for months now and I'm not getting anywhere but more confused. I have one file server that keeps spiking the system service at random times. Nothing else is running on the server, no AV or other apps. When this happens my win7 clients trying to access files on that server will come to a screeching halt. That's the really strange part, my XP clients keep working like nothing is wrong. I've done all the trouble shooting I can find for this problem, it's very hard to narrow down exactly what's causing the system process to spike. I noticed that one of the win7 clients in particular was moving a lot of data (receiving .5 MB/sec steady) but they had no apps running off the server, weren't searching, search service was turned off. But on that client it was the system service that was receiving the data from that server. I rebooted the client and the server cpu immediately went back to normal. My googling can't find anything that links the two together. Just hoping someone else has encountered this. Both client and server are patched but this has been going on for a long time, at least the last couple years. Thanks
RE: [NTSysADM] September MS Patches
I usually verify against this before I roll out updates. http://www.askwoody.com/ From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Glen Johnson Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 8:36 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] September MS Patches Humm. I'm not see those particular issues, but so far, the issue I described is for Server 2012, not office installed. I did however notice that a couple 2008 R2 terminal servers with Office 2013 installed took about 15 or 20 minutes to reboot after installing the 14 office 2013 updates. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:20 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] September MS Patches Yep...lots of issues this month... http://windowsitpro.com/microsoft-office/more-windows-update-issues-emerging From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Glen Johnson Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:11 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] September MS Patches Anyone else seeing this months MS updates requiring two reboots, or more specifically, all updates selected, install, reboot and then 4 of the previously selected updates being re-offered. 2nd try seems to work ok. Not a problem, just takes a bit more time than usual. Also a bit of a hassle when we patch systems and schedule a reboot in the middle of the night. This month some systems will take two days to get fully patched. Please excuse if this has already been discussed. I tried to send earlier but found I had been unsubscribed from the list. I though the list was unusually quiet.
[NTSysADM] RE: EqulLogic or EMC
My personal opinion is EQ, not knowing your requirements it's just a personal preference. We have and PS5000 and PS6000 in a pool running all our SQL DB's, 40 VM servers and 50 View desktops and not even making them sweat. And we are getting ready to order a new 6100E 72TB. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David McSpadden Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 12:10 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] EqulLogic or EMC I am down to EqualLogic 6500E or VNX5300. Anyone have any favorites? Ups or downs regarding either of these? Thank you David W. McSpadden Begin Planning Arrange for Reconnaissance and Coordination Make Reconnaissance Complete Plan Issue Order Supervise This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
[NTSysADM] RE: Looking for Hyper-V server hardware
Look at an older precision workstations, they have pretty much the same guts as servers. I'm running T5400's at home with 24GB and dual quad core 2GHz Xeons. Can be found pretty cheap on ebay. Last one I picked up was around $300 a year ago. They use the same RAM as Poweredge 2900's. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:57 AM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: Looking for Hyper-V server hardware I'd think whiteboxing would not be viable since a Xeon proc and 32GB of RAM will just about consume your $500 right off the bat. Why does it have to be a Xeon? A quad core i5 whitebox might be doable for $500. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Lum Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:19 AM To: NTSysADM@lists.myITforum.commailto:NTSysADM@lists.myITforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] Looking for Hyper-V server hardware My old home lab PowerEdge 840 server is giving me issues so I'm looking to upgrade, looking to spend ~500 (can be used, obviously!). Ideally I'd like a tower server populated with 32GB RAM. I'm not picky on brand (partial to Dell because that's what my clients run, but not a requirement) but do want Xeon instead of the AMD equivalent. The closest I can find is a Dell T300 populated with 24GB RAM for about $500 shipped, which would work (the 840 has only 8GB RAM!). Since this is for my home lab I don't mind building a white box system either. Suggestions anyone? Dell Outlet prices are out of my price range... * Tower * Xeon proc * 24+GB installed * HDD's / optical drive not necessary, I have my own David Lum Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764
[NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback?
300 and up https://www.barracuda.com/products/spamandvirusfirewall/models From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Humphries Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:57 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback? The lower end barracuda boxes don't do individual user quarantines, do they? I know you used to have to step up to the 400 maybe? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:44 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback? +1 on the Cuda. Been running them for 10 years. Not sure on the dist list quarantine. But you can get a free demo unit/vm from them and their support is top notch. They will tell you how that part of it works. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of N Parr Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 1:42 PM To: 'ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: [NTSysADM] RE: FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback? I've been running Barracuda's appliance in a VM for a couple years now and it does everything you require. But I don't allow user access to quarantine. I set it in global mode and generally forget about it. Once you get it tuned right for spam and ham it's pretty dead on. Every week or so I'll take a look at my quarantine just to see if anything legit has been caught. I guess you could give users access to a shared mailbox that contains the quarantine. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Brutsche Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:15 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.commailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [NTSysADM] FortiGate FortiMail email security boxes - feedback? We are currently using a Dell SonicWALL Email Security VMware appliance and The Boss Man(tm) would like to evaluate alternatives. One of the appliances that meets our requirements is the FortiGate FortiMail Email Security Appliance. Is anyone using one of these boxes, and, if you are, do you have any feedback you would like to share? In case anyone is wondering, these are the requirements: * LDAP support (believe it or not, there are actually boxes that don't support that!) * Available as a virtual appliance so we can run it in the VMware cluster * Support for quarantine delegation - we need to give specific users access to the quarantine folder for distribution groups -- Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.commailto:p...@optimumdata.com
