Re: [Ql-Users] TFS

2008-03-26 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] TFS


I haven't seen Quanta but I gather it says I have left the QL scene.
 I haven't!  Read QL Today for the true position.


The QL Today article does give an accurate description of Tony's situation, 
but in one way we have contributed to the misunderstanding.

The headline TFS bows out does give a misleading impression and Tony's 
suggestion to me of TFS takes a back seat or similar would have been 
better. I take full responsibility for this misleading headline and will 
apologise to Tony in the next issue.

Tony's email to QL Today explaining his decision in some detail was very 
clear and from it I could fully understand his reasons and respect him for 
it.

As a QL trader Tony has a distinguished record of innovation and 
trustworthiness that probably no other trader, past or present, can rival. 
It would have been remiss of me not to have paid tribute to him in QL Today,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] New web page

2008-02-16 Thread gwicks
I have now added the promised maps page to the Just Words! website. 

At the moment it is not really usable. You will have to wait until issue 3 of 
QL Today - due in the middle of March - to load the data in Hugh Room's mapping 
program.

I have also taken the opportunity to make one or two cosmetic changes. The 
Downloads page is now called Freeware. I have also changed the position of 
the page links to minimise problems caused by the pop-up adverts.

http://members.lycos.co.uk/geoffwicks/justwords.htm

Best Wishes,


Geoff 
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Portable computers - experiences

2008-02-04 Thread gwicks
And dare I say it for fear of being expelled from the QL community, the 
email was perfect in Outlook Express!

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread gwicks
Just a reminder that the QL Today deadline is a week away, 10th February.

We have some good, varied and interesting material in, but probably not quite 
enough to fill an issue. As we have two lengthy articles short contributions 
would be welcome.

At the moment the news section look like being a little sombre, so some more 
news items to lighten the news pages would be welcome,

Best Wishes,

Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches

2008-02-03 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Deadline approaches


 gwicks wrote:

 At the moment the news section look like being a little sombre,
 What is sombre?
  so some more news items to lighten the news pages would be welcome,


You are part of the sombre news, although you are not leaving the QL 
community. There will be a tribute to and a potted history of TF Services.

Another is John Mason's last Quanta Magazine editorial that members have not 
responded to Quanta's pleas for new committee members. (Should there now be 
better news, please let us know Quanta committee.) There are also one or two 
more minor stories that are a bit negative.

What I am a little concerned about is that we could recreate some of the 
atmosphere in the first half of the 1990s when DJ Software closed down 
followed a year later by QL World. The screams that we heard then The end 
of the QL is nigh were more than a little premature.

In fact there is still a lot happening on the QL scene  and we need to 
publicise this. It's just that we need to be flexible in thinking of the 
future, just as we had to be flexible to survive the early 90s.

 I am afraid I cannot lighten the scene.  I am having to stop any active
 QL work (and adverts) as I am far too busy.  I will still be doing the
 usual behind the scenes but not promoting it as there are long delays in
 anything I do QLwise.  Actually it will probably not reduce my workload
 at all as there has been very little QL trading activity in the past few
 years!


Fully understood. In fact we have spoken about this situation many times at 
shows. Your contribution has been much appreciated and has been far wider 
that just TF Services,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC

2008-01-04 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Windows, Linux and QPC


 David McCann wrote:
 Could your software run under QemuLator? That works fine with Linux and
 I think it accepts SMSQ now.

 Since when is there a Linux version of QemuLator?


There must be one since Simon Goodwin demonstrated it at the Birmingham 
Show,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] QL Today apology

2007-12-19 Thread gwicks
The QL Today team would like to apologise to our UK subscribers that we have 
been unable to keep our promise to deliver issue 2 shortly before Christmas. 
Although the magazine was ready at the end of November it was not possible to 
print the UK copies immediately.

These are now at the printers and will be shipped to the UK tomorrow. We hope 
you will receive your copy early in the New Year,

Best Wishes,


Geoff

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Short deadline

2007-10-28 Thread gwicks
This is just a reminder that the QL Today deadline is in a week's time, 5th 
November.

We have already started work on the issue as we want to have it out well before 
Christmas.

Please note that the deadline is 5th November and not 15th November as I 
incorrectly told one or two people some time ago,

Best wishes,


Geoff

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Punters

2007-10-10 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Loguidice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Punters


 Is there more information somewhere about the QL-on-a-stick?


We also hope to have a review in QL Today and I see from another message on 
the list that the Quanta Magazine are planning a review as well. However 
that will mean a little patience in both cases,

Best wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Punters

2007-10-10 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Arnould [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Punters


 I don't know, I have a VERY hard time taking this subject
 seriously at all.

 Wolfgang


Same for me: there definitely must be some differences in the brains
on the Island vs continent! (no offense meant: without the big island
we would not have the QL!)

There is no offence. This really concerns the finer nuances of a word and 
therefore is of little concern to non-native English speakers.

I have a a stock of phrases to completely confuse foreigners about the state 
of British brains. This one even had the English foxed at the Hove AGM, but 
not a Welshman at Birmingham:

In Bristol they call them Cardiffs.

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Punters

2007-10-08 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Punters


 Hi Geoff,

 Just a word of caution. Please be careful in your assumptions about
 the person who raised the matter with me. It is someone I have known
 for many years and for whom I have a good deal of respect. This is
 the reason I have raised the matter on this list.

 Well, hopefully I didn't make any assumptions in my assorted rants - I was 
 ranting in general and not at any one person in person. I do not know who 
 the 'objector' was and certainly cannot make any assumptions about that 
 person at all.

 If, on the other hand, my email(s) were taken to have assumed something 
 about the person, then I apologise unreservedly as that was not my 
 intention.


Also on my part there was no intention to accuse you or anyone else of 
personal critcism of the person in question. I just thought we could be 
going in a dangerous direction in which some readers might just draw this 
conclusion.

I would repeat yet again. My main purpose is to raise this as a serious 
matter, and on the whole the discussion has had the right balance of serious 
comment, humour and passion,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Punters

2007-10-08 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Punters


I have been severely rebuked by a gentleman who wishes to be known as an
 attendee at the Birmingham Workshop. He assures me that his nautical
 ambitions are zero and that he has never been on a punt in his life.

 Pity he is not a reader of this list, nor of dictionaries it would seem.

 There is nothing nautical about a punt, dangerous on the briny.


Any grammatical fault is mine - a bad precis of what was written to me.

 This is a serious matter. Over the years the term punter has been used
 for the non-traders, non-Quanta committee members who attend workshops. It
 does have derogatory connotations, but I find attendee far to formal a 
 word.

 If there is anything deprecatory about the term it is of the traders,
 suggesting as it does that anything on offer is a bit wager, will it work
 or not.


Good point. I think this is one reason why I have doubts about the term.

 At 14:16 08/10/2007 +0100, you wrote:
An important part of the planning of QL is 21 was a lady's programme. On
the website I wanted to use the term partner programme, which I felt was
the better modern usage. JM objected to this. Sarah Gilpin held us
figuratively apart and tactfully suggested guest programme, which is 
what
we used,

 Suggests to me she or the guest of indeterminate gender was on their own, 
 a
 game of patience perhaps ?

 Or was partner programme a dating game ?


What a good idea for a future workshop! In an email last week I described 
the attendance of the complete Quanta committee as The Full Monty. I was 
amused to read on the hotel's website today that the room we had can 
accommodate 15 people for a cabaret performance.

BTW a pity you could not make it on Saturday. It is always interesting to 
meet someone with whom you have occasionally sparred. And thanks to all 
those people who did attend. You gave both Quanta and myself a huge morale 
boost,

Best Wishes,


Geoff
 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] QL on a stick

2007-10-07 Thread gwicks
Dilwyn has kindly provided QL Today with a review copy of a QL on a stick.

This is just the CD which you have to copy to your own USB memory stick.

Would anyone be interested in doing a review for QL Today?

Ideally we would like to publish in issue 2, which has a deadline of 15th 
November,

Best wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Punters

2007-10-07 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Punters


 It isn't very often that Quanta agrees with Geoff Wicks:

Is this a subtle Quanta plot to destroy my reputation?

Actually I am not being facetious about the use of the word punter. I wote 
in a light-hearted way, but I think the person concerned is making a fair 
point, and we should be sensitive to it.

The problem is I cannot think of a suitable alternative that also conveys 
the sort of atmosphere we have at shows,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Tea for two?

2007-10-04 Thread gwicks
Good, this will mean 4 traders and 2 semi traders - the best trader attended 
show for some years.

Thanks also all the other people who have responded. The reason I would like 
this information is that Simon is a perfectionist and would like to know at 
which level he should pitch his presentation.

Simon will be kicking off the presentations at 12.00 and I hope there will 
be time for them all. It will be very much trading am and presentations pm,

Best Wishes,


Geoff
- Original Message - 
From: Derek Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Tea for two?


I have not been to  QL Show/Workshop  for  a  while, so it will be
 interesting to see any development if any.

 I would be interesting in seeing any applications software developments
 for the QL.

 I am going to attend the workshop with a selection of low price Black
 Pentium 4 PCs and small hard drives suitable for the QL.

 Derek

 Tony Firshman wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Richard Kilpatrick wrote:

 On 4 Oct 2007, at 13:28, gwicks wrote:


 Just a reminder that the Birmingham workshop is this weekend.

 We have some distinguished guests:

 The full Quanta committee (Dare I say the full Monty?)

 Three traders: Tony Firshman, Roy Wood and Rich Mellor

 Two semi-traders: Dilwyn Jones and Just Words!

 Three first rate presenters:

 Best wishes,

 Two here planning to attend, Jennifer  myself. We'll want to join
 Quanta if possible there, as I'm useless at remembering otherwise ;)

 We've met Tony, and I've dealt with Rich before (I can nag about
 Enterprise membranes!. I think we must own all the ones in the wild
 though).

 .. and I challenged him to get to 7500rpm in his Wankel powered car when
 driving off.  Did you get to that, Richard?  It sounded very impressive
 (and quiet). He bought an OPD monitor off me.

 Derek Stewart and John Hall will also be there.

 Tony

 - --
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://firshman.co.uk
 Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman
 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHBOe0M3RzOs8+btoRAgPKAJ9ZUqkmE9EH5XJmoBb5bhTvXUEyPACeJlDT
 7hEnxGbcBez4A/uv6slBZg0=
 =S9m+
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

 --
 This email has been verified as Virus free
 Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net



 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Birmingham Workshop update 2

2007-09-24 Thread gwicks
Dear All,

I now have details of Simon Goodwin's presentation. In his own words:

 Simon's talk will be a demonstration of creating a fast modern Qdos
set-up, using entirely free software, and how it works, which others
could follow using free or very low-cost 'surplus' hardware; several
operating systems and Qdos emulators will be demonstrated in the
process, along with familiar applications and perhaps a few more 
esoteric or obscure ones.

There will be a competition with a fully-configured Qdos-compatible
system with high-resolution graphics, sound and Internet capability
as the 'prize' - and Simon's talk will explain how that works.

Simon has asked if he could have the 12.00 noon slot and I intend to honour 
that request.

I think you will agree that Simon's contribution in itself would be a good 
reason for attending the workshop, but we are also offering a good attendance 
by traders and other good presenters,

Best wishes,



Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Quanta Birmingham workshop update

2007-09-21 Thread gwicks
The Quanta Birmingham workshop is now taking its final shape and is looking 
very promising.

We shall have a good attendance of traders Tony Firshman, Roy Wood and Rich 
Mellor. This will be the first time that Rich has been able to attend a show 
for some years.

The two semi-traders Dilwyn Jones and Just Words! will also be present.

We have three presenters booked - Dilwyn Jones, myself and Simon Goodwin.

Dilwyn will be demonstrating his QL on a Stick which last week and this week 
has produced quite a few mailings on this list. If there is time he will also 
demonstrate Launchpad.

I shall present an item Mapping Ancient and Modern. Hugh Rooms has brought us 
to the brink of a major breakthrough in QL map drawing technology. I shall 
present a history of QL map drawing programs leading up to a sneak preview of 
what we can expect in the future.

At the moment I can't give any details of Simon's presentation. This is because 
we are still negotiating and investigating the technical facilities we can 
offer him. Suffice it to say that he has put a lot of time and effort into his 
contribution. I hope to tell you more before the show.

Simon would like to have an idea who intends to be at the show. If you expect 
to come perhaps you could let me know via this list or privately. Obviously 
this is not intended as advance booking or an irrevocable commitment.

See you on the 6th October!

Best wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Change of venue for Birmingham Workshop

2007-08-31 Thread gwicks
Quanta members will probably have received their notification of the change 
of venue by now. There is just a little extra information for public 
transport users.

Unfortunately Solihull station will be closed for engineering maintenance 
work on 6th October. There is a replacement bus service from Birmingham Snow 
Hill (but NOT calling at Birmingham Moor Street) leaving 3 times an hour. 
You should allow an extra half an hour for your journey.

 The hotel is easy to find from the bus and rail station. Go to the end of 
the Station Approach, cross over to Homer Road and then follow the signs to 
the Police Station or the Magistrates Court. The Holiday Inn is just a 
little further on the right hand side,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Just a week to go!

2007-08-08 Thread gwicks
Just a reminder that the QL Today copy date is 15th August, a week today.

We already have some good and varied copy for what looks like a promising 
issue, but as always more is welcome.

We also already have a good news section, but again more is always welcome,


Best Wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] West Midlands workshop

2007-07-29 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Church [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Repeat message


 Geoff,

 Thank you for the invite, yes I would be interested in coming.  If you 
 would
 let me know the venue.

 Tony Church
 Tele 01707662791
 Fax  01707662791
 Mob  07886567786
 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the message. We shall all be pleased to see you on 6th October. 
All the details we have at the moment are in John Gilpin's email under the 
above subject heading.

And now a couple of messages for John Gilpin:

At the moment there is no mention of the show on the Quanta website.

If I can do anything to help West Midlands organising the show, bearing in 
mind my experience, I shall be pleased to do so. As I mentioned this will be 
the first show in the Midlands for about 10 years and I would like to see it 
be a success,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] West Midlands workshop

2007-07-29 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] West Midlands workshop


 The Shows page on my website has a modest map showing how to get to
 Steelhouse lane - look spretty straightforward from the M6, though
 I've never actually driven in central Birmingham.
 www.dilwyn.uk6.net/gen/shows/shows.html

 Looks like A38(M) from M6 to the junction with A34 and a couple of
 local streets thereon.

 Anyone know what parking's like there, and any train stations nearby?


Really a question for the Birmingham people, but I suspect parking will be a 
nightmare. Snow Hill station is just up the road. New Street and Moor Street 
stations are about 10 - 15 minutes walk away. Snow Hill is also the end 
station of the Birmingham Metro. Public Transport could not be better. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] West Midlands Workshop

2007-07-28 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Repeat message


 The reason for holding our Summer Workshop in October is that due to the
 fixed date of the AGM, we were unable to hold the Summer during that
 fortnight in April which we all agree was as near to Summer as we're
 likely
 to get this year. This is an OFFICIAL Quanta Policy Decision unless we
 start
 to name our Workshops after the event then study the weather/climatic
 conditions in order to satisfy some purists (mole or otherwise!!) {;-)


Seriously this time John. Why not just Spring and Autumn. Quite a lot of
people like to forget their QLs in the Summer. (Although one enthusiast
takes his QL with him in a camper van so that he can still write for QL
Today!)

Even more seriously I hope everyone will pencil in 6th October in their
diaries. As far as I know this is the first Midlands show for about 10 years
and that one was in the East Midlands not the West Midlands. From all
accounts the West Midlands has an active sub-group although we know little
about them. 6th October is a good chance to get to know them better.

Can you let us have more details, such as times etc.,  ASAP? E.g. post on
this list if the information comes in long before the publication date of
the Quanta Magazine. (Not forgetting that QL Today will need the details for
an issue coming out in mid September.)

At last a show that is easy to get to from the Derby sin bin!

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Repeat message

2007-07-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] [ql-users] Repeat message


 Hi Tony,

 You, along with any others who have an interest in the QL would be very
 welcome at the Quanta Summer Workshop being organised by the West Midlands
 QL User Group in Birmingham on Saturday October 6th. I'm certain that they
 would welcome you all in support of their efforts.

Summer in October?

Do we take it that Quanta has some secret information that Autumn and Summer 
have been swopped over this year?

Those damn moles have let me down again!

Best Wishes,

Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Testing (new email system) please ignore.

2007-07-04 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Testing (new email system) please ignore.


 BT are very cavalier, they buggered me around when Orange stopped my BBand
 through incompetance. Led to five weeks without coutesy of BT 
 incompetance.


I had lots of problems with BT when I went over to broadband in April. First 
they disconnected my telephone line when they enabled it for broadband. Then 
they (or the courier company) sent the router to the wrong address. Then 
when I ordered a wireless router they typed in the wrong code and said it 
was out of stock. Before it was all finally sorted out they sent me two of 
everything. However I now have a faultless and fast system.

A quick word with customer services

 I never had a quick one of those till I got through to high level
 complaints, number from OFCOM.


My experience of customer services throughout this saga was very good. They 
were very sympathetic and helpful whenever I had to contact them. (Partly 
the reason  I got two routers and two wireless routers.) Technical help was 
50/50. One very thorough Indian girl who was a bit schocked when I asked to 
speak to her supervisor so that I could praise her good work. One idiot 
Indian man whose technical knowledge was less than mine.

My problem is not BT but Royal Mail. Out of 5 recorded delivery and 1 
special delivery letters sent this year they can prove delivery in only one 
case.

  Best Wishes,

  Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QL compatible printer

2007-05-31 Thread gwicks
I am currently doing a little upgrading and have a few goodies on offer free of 
charge. I am making them available to the QL community in the first instance:

CANON BJ-200ex bubble jet printer. I normally would not offer this as it is 
very elderly and the cartridges are getting pricey, but the advantage is that 
it is fully QL, including black box with parallel cable, compatible.

PLUSTEK SCANNER: This is a good scanner for anyone still using Windows98, but 
it is not XP compatible. Comes with OCR and graphics software.

PARALLEL PRINT SWITCH: Allows you to use 2 parallel printers from one computer. 
Comes with special computer to switch box cable. 

As I mentioned each of the items is completely free. The big snag is that you 
need to be within easy travelling distance of the Derby sin bin. Too heavy and 
costly to use post.

Please email privately if you are interested,

Best wishes,

Geoff 
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Any old iron.

2007-05-24 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Any old iron.



In a similar vein, if USB ever becomes a reality for us, USB pen
drives are getting dirt
cheap at the moment. cclonline.com advertised 1GB ones for just £5.99
in Micro Mart fairly recently, for example (a very effective advert,
showing the little pen drive alongside a big pile of 711 equivalent
floppies!). Time to revive the idea of
QL On A Stick again perhaps!

A forlorn hope. The last time this idea came up everyone was 
super-enthusiastic, but equally everyone had good reasons why they were the 
person not to do it. Things only get done when someone is prepared to get 
their hands dirty.

Obviously, if USB hardware came along, things like this would need
software drivers. I'd probably go as far as to suggest that these pen
drives should get the first QL drivers! After all, many QLers did
without hard disks and quite happily used an 8MB RomDisq!

Incidentally there was some discussion about this at the Quanta AGM, both in 
the formal meeting and in informal discussions.

If someone comes with a good reason for funding (a) USB software driver(s) 
and a good plan, I suspect they would get a sympathetic hearing from Quanta. 
We have people in the QL community who have the skills to write to driver, 
but the programming challenge seems to be a greater motivator than financial 
rewards.

Another surprise announcement at the AGM was that Quanta has financed, by 
means of a loan, the manufacture of 200 keyboard membranes available from 
RWAP. I extracted a promise from the chairman that this would be publicised 
to non-members, but so far it has not been done.

Remember QL Today told you it first!

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] New QUANTA web site launched

2007-05-12 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Tony Firshman 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] New QUANTA web site launched




 Looks very good.  I though would *never* use mailto: on any site I run -
 invites spam.
 CGI link to  form is infinitely better.  Spammers *will* harvest the
 emails and you cannot change to different email addresses, ever.

Indeed a good site and well worth a look.

Quanta has used mailto for years without too many problems. When I was on 
the Quanta committee I received very little spam via my Quanta tag. The 
funny thing was I not only got my own spam, but also that for the chairman, 
but I only once got his genuine emails. (Pity it would have saved me a lot 
of time and expense training moles!),

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QL wiki review

2007-05-12 Thread gwicks
We are still short of general copy for the next issue of QL Today.

Would some kind person like to do a review during the next seven days of Rich's 
wiki site? Or even of Quanta's new website.

Both items are in our news section, but it would be nice to have a more 
detailed account of both,

Best wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Deadline looming

2007-05-08 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Deadline looming


 Not sure if I'll have much for you - still in the process of moving house 
 and most of my 'life' is currently residing in cardboard boxes all over 
 the place. :o(

 You do have a small update to the last article on conversion to long from 
 Ascii, and I might have an answer to George's comments (I have his email 
 here at work) and Simon N Goodwin has contacted me also with an email (as 
 yet unread) on the subject too.

Thanks for the message. Your house move is more important. At the moment we 
still have your update plus two articles and a letter from George. What we 
are short of is more general articles,

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Deadline looming

2007-05-07 Thread gwicks
Just a reminder that the QL Today deadline is just a week away.

We have quite a bit of copy over from the last issue, but not enough for a full 
magazine. More welcome.

We would like to have issue 5 ready for the Eindhoven show,

Best wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Workshop and Quanta AGM - 15th April 2007

2007-04-19 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 10:27 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Hove Workshop and Quanta AGM - 15th April 2007


 Hi,

 Enjoyable event ... :-)


What made it especially enjoyable was the degree of interactiveness, 
especially on the website and in the AGM. Let's hope Quanta learns from 
this.

We now have an interesting committee. Probably for the first time in years 
we have a full committee of hard workers, which promises well for Quanta's 
future. Just a pity they still have to learn the word sorry, so in my book 
they remain on probation.

As you can see I am back on line,

Best Wishes,

Geoff





___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show


 ...demonstrating programs written by other people, but well worth
 seeing some
 of the progress made in QL garphics (that's a typo, but what a nice
 word!).
 Corrupted graphics, eh!

But then I'm very corruptable. Used tenners in a brown envelope under the 
toilet door in Hove very welcome.

 Although I can't be there, I'd suggest a demo of the pictures on my
 wallpapers CD to show what is possible. You should be able to use the
 BMP program as a viewer to show what the pictures will be like and
 perhaps demonstrate their use as simple wallpaper with just a BGIMAGE
 command. I seem to remember my background images generating a lot of
 interest when I was demonstrating Launchpad at some shows.


I can see what I can do, but I don't seem to have saved the disc I made up 
for Byfleet.

 Curiouser and curiouser. Must reprogram the moles.
 QL Terrorist Wicks strikes again. Must remember to include more
 pictures of him in QaLendar 2008 so people know exactly who to watch
 out for ;-)


Corrupt and a terrorist. I could be organising the first QL show in Cuba 
before long,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-26 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show


 Just tried to check the details for this show but most of the websites
 (Quanta, JMS, QLT) only refer to last year's one or mention this year's
 dates as provisional and give no detail. Since Quanta's doesnt even
 show the year, I was initially confused into thinking the next Hove show
 would be on 28th May!


I have to plead guilty. I believe I am the provisional one. I had 
forgotten to update,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-26 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Roy wood 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show


 Geoff Wicks' talk - he has not really told me what that will be (if he
 has changed it from before)


Since no one has suggested anything else, it will be a live version of the 
Perfect Partners article from QL Today volume 11 issue 2. I am really 
demonstrating programs written by other people, but well worth seeing some 
of the progress made in QL garphics (that's a typo, but what a nice word!).

 Quanta's website demo (I don't recall and can find no email telling me
 this would happen)


Curiouser and curiouser. Must reprogram the moles.

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-26 Thread gwicks
Thanks John. Always a good idea to publicise things like this beforehand, 
even if it took you 10 days to reply to my message. No doubt all the 
committee were away attending a mole hunting course ;-).

Also good to see that it will be an interactive session.



- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show



 Did you think of this one yourself, or did your mole tell you that it was
 already planned?

 Roy has been asked to add it to the presentations list.


 I understand that there are a number of alternatives to choose from and
 the
 Web Master would value the membership's preferences.



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-17 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Derek Stewart 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show


 Why all this mole business at the heart of Quanta, have you got a
 vendetta against them

 Derek



Don't forget that it was a member of the committee who described me as a 
terrorist on this list.

And the mole is not who everyone thinks it is.

First law of spying. Confuse the opposition.

Yours subversively,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-15 Thread gwicks
I have had another idea about the activities at the Hove show.

For some time now we have been promised an all new, whistles, bells and 
ribbons, updated Quanta website. This is near to fruition as Quanta has 
found a webmaster, although he will only officially take up his duties at 
the AGM. However I understand from my mole in the heart of Quanta that work 
on the site is well advanced.

Surely Hove is a good opportunity to give us a live preview. Much more 
interesting to see the thing in practice than having to listen to promises 
during the AGM.

It is also a good chance for Quanta to show off some real gains that are 
being made. Quanta's publicity for the electronic version of its magazine 
has been abysmal - QL Today has given better coverage - and let's not repeat 
poor publicity with the website.

MESSAGE FOR ROY: Could we please have more details over the Saturday night 
dinner? Starting time, for example. Thanks in anticipation,

Best Wishes,

Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hove Show

2007-03-13 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hove Show


Obviously price will be a consideration to all those intending to stop
overnight for this year's AGM. Quanta have found that the Travelodge Super
Savers at £15 per night at Gatwick Airport (within easy striking distance 
of
Hove) to be the best deal so far. (Google search for Travelodge will take
you to their booking site.)

Is that the one south of Gatwick? If so, Quanta members could be personae 
non grata. That was the place where I profusely bled over the reception desk 
on my way to the last Hove AGM,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Request for speakers

2007-03-11 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Roy wood 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:19 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Request for speakers

A slight change of subject.

I have a big problem, which is a big mouth. When Roy asked me to give a talk 
at the Hove show I said yes. Even worse, my moles deep in the heart of 
Quanta tell me that I am advertised as a star performer in the next Quanta 
Magazine.

In general I have been working on an idea of giving a live presentation of 
articles that have appeared in QL Today. Not necessarily my own work, but 
for example demonstrating other people's software. We have a good issue of 
QL Today coming up for publication at Hove, but unfortunately it does not 
have any suitable material for a live presentation.

I can fall back on the presentation I had prepared but did not give at 
Byfleet, but if anyone has anything they would like presented at Hove - or 
other ideas, please let me know. I can't promise, but I shall look at all 
suggestions,

Best wishes

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] This list: Rrepeat postings

2007-02-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: hitchies 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: [ql-users] This list: Rrepeat postings


 Hi everyone!

 Anyone else getting duplicate/triplicate copies of some list mailings
 lately, please?

 John in Wales


I had this problem some time ago, but that was because of problems at my 
server. Do the duplicates come in at the same time or at different times?

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff

2007-02-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Rich Mellor 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff


On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:03:19 -, Jan Palenicek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Ah, but if Quanta made all this free, what reason would there be for
Quanta to exist?  It would offer no different benefits to its members than
the general public (apart from the magazine).

Some authors placed their programs in the Quanta library on the condition 
that they were only to be available to Quanta members, and so cannot be more 
widely distributed.

Even Quanta can be naughty at times. Some authors, including myself, have 
put material in the library on the strict condition that only a nominal 
copying fee can be charged. I, tongue in cheek, threatened to sue Quanta for 
£15,000, their then capital for charging £10 for a CD that cost about 50p to 
produce.



However, if someone wants to scan in the QDOS Reference Guide (with
permission from Tony Tebby of course) and the Jan Jones handbook (with
permission from Jan Jones), then feel free.  Both Tony Tebby and Jan Jones
are around and contactible, therefore feel free to ask for their
permission.  I doubt you will get it, but you never know.

Just in case the Jan Jones debate starts again I understand that she is very 
reluctant to see further publication of her work. It was only with a great 
deal of diplomacy and patience that Quanta was able to get her permission 
for their two reprints.

As to motivation - what greater motivation do you need - the QL has a very
small user base and you would get the undying thanks of every one of
them.  The main problem is that even when software does come out, so few
copies are actually sold (even at £5 a copy) that both traders and
software authors lose interest and the feedback is nil - this is all due
to the size of the market which is ever diminishing.

Total sales (in order of publication - see how the market has got smaller):

Solvit-Plus84
QL-Thesaurus97
Style-Check85
QL-2-PC Transfer53
QL-Rhymes10
Auto-Graph10
Vocabulary Database3
Pindown1


Best Wishes,


Geoff




___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] This list: Rrepeat postings

2007-02-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Roy wood 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] This list: Rrepeat postings


 Since this thread is about this list can someone tell me the current
 method for subscribing?

 I have a new user who wants to sign on but the list has changed many
 times since I subscribed and I have no idea what to tell him.



Tut, tut Roy. This was published in the last QL Today, page 4 QL NEWS LIST 
Closure.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

with the word 'subscribe' in the body of the text,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee

2007-02-24 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Wolfgang Lenerz 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee


 gwicks wrote :
 Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
 not
 have needed a request. There are times when Quanta needs to take an
 initiative,

 Best wishes,

 Geoff

 I'm not so sure I agree with you there.
 You can't expect Quanta to contact all those with potential projects.
 Surely it would be more reasonable for that person to contact Quanta?


Sorry, this is going to be a long email.

Can we go back to first principles?

It the last few weeks there has been an enormous amount of criticism of
Quanta for its failure or unwillingness to fund the Goldfire project.
Quanta has been told, sometimes by non-members, that it is its duty, if
necessary, to use up all of its capital on the Goldfire project.

Quanta has been unfairly and unjustly maligned.

In 2004 a group of us were prepared to present a business case to Quanta for
funding of the project. This never happened for the simple reason that Nasta
himself was not enthusiastic about Quanta involvement.

I do not know what Nasta's present attitude is, but I have no reason to
believe it has changed. I can also see good reasons, partly because of the
links between his work situation and Goldfire, why he took this attitude.

In the circumstances Quanta cannot have any involvement in the Goldfire
project.

For all that muchof the criticism of Quanta over its capital is justified.
Nevertheless I believe Quanta has changed a lot of the last two years. The
huge protest we had on this list at the end of 2004 when Quanta chairman 
John Mason threatened to close it down, not realising that it was not his to 
close
down, was an enormous shock to Quanta and changed a lot of attitudes. Among
other things I think Quanta is now more willing to make use of its capital
than it was three years ago.

Unfortunately some of the old thinking tends to persist and Quanta still
gives the impression of being a bureaucratic body resisting change and
expenditure. Even more unfortunately this has been combined with a tendency
for this committee to give more power to itself and less to the members. I
have had a lot of experience of constitutions and I have never seen one
which gives the executive so much power and the members so little as the
Quanta Constitution. It is a most unhealthy situation when that executive is
safeguarding £12,000 of members' money. (Please note I am talking
structures, not people here. I am not implying a lack of integrity by the
committee.)

Other worrying features of Quanta are that it has lost 86 members in two
years, and that it is proving more and more difficult to service the vast
majority of members.

Frankly, if I did not have QL Today responsibilities and attend shows, I
would not be a member of Quanta.  Quanta means very little to me. I don't
read the most of the magazine, the website hasn't been updated in over a
year and I use download libraries, not Quanta. I hear many people saying
similar things, but who remain in Quanta as a form of loyalty.

Quanta more than anything else needs to look at its image and in particular
at the bad financial reputation it has. I am not suggesting that Quanta
embraces every harebrained scheme that appears on this list, and I also
fully agree that a detailed business plan is necessary for major
investments. At the same time it is also important Quanta keeps an eye out
for projects for which it could be involved, and itself takes an initiative,
because this will show a great willingness to be an active partner in the QL
community.

The USB project was a good example of this. It concerns a major need of the
QL community, it was not expensive and it involves an established trader
with a proven track record. As it happens Tony Firshman has intervened
effectively, but now he will rightly get the kudos and not Quanta.

This next bit is going to hurt.

John Gilpin is being dishonest and disingenuous in his financial and other
objections.

 In 1995 Quanta made an expenditure  of  £576 of members' money after just 3
telephone calls to 4 of the 6 committee members. (The other two were on
holiday.) One of the four, me, said no, but it was a democratic decision.

If the committee want to do it the machinery is in place for quick decision
making. Within 24 hours its is possible for an email exchange to take place
between all committee members. We did it several times when I was on the
committee. Quanta also has an efficient secretary and Sarah Gilpin has
ensured that telephone decisions are confirmed by email and the emails
recorded in the minutes,

Best Wishes,


Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee

2007-02-22 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee

{The point as I see it is that NO ONE who wanted some QUANTA money bothered
to pick up the phone!! You are absolutely correct that following such a
phone call, all that is needed is a couple of emails (to get the approval of
the majority of the committee), a cheque, a receipt for the goods purchased
and a record of the email committee decision by the secretary.}

Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should not 
have needed a request. There are times when Quanta needs to take an 
initiative,

Best wishes,

Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee

2007-02-21 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin 
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee



What my Audited Accounts do tell me is that QUANTA still has an Accumulated 
Fund of over £12,000 (all will be disclosed in the next issue of QUANTA 
Magazine) and we have a committee who are prepared to listen to specific 
requests for loans or grants for QL Development.

This has been the situation since I joined the Committee in 2000 (just at 
the end of a very successful arrangement with D  D and their work in 
supplying Q40/60s). We have extended our offer on a number of occasions but 
have had no takers to date. Let me repeat, on behalf of the QUANTA 
Committee, If you have a project which you think would be valuable to the 
QL fraternity but which needs some development support, PLEASE write to us 
with as much detail as you can give, including your business plan, to 
enable us to consider your request.

Bye the Bye, don't expect a chat line comment like If QUANTA were to 
sponsor someone to the tune of $100 US + postage to produce immediate 
financial support. Come on you guys, tickle the keyboard ivories and ask us 
properly for what you think you need!! The worst you can expect is for this 
traditionalist committee to say  Not this time.

I have returned to this mailing, because I realised overnight that you have 
unwittingly defined the difference between a radical and a 
traditionalist.

The last time a Goldfire type expansion card was seriously discussed by the 
QL community was in 2004. This radical was not sitting on his backside 
waiting for a piece of paper. He was out there in the field talking to the 
potential developer (and other developers) at QL2004. He was also talking to 
the trader who would have marketed the card about preparing a business plan. 
(Now what were the Quanta team at QL2004 doing? - oh sorry, I forgot - 
Quanta boycotted the first international QL show for 4 years.)

We know the Dear Leader is never happier that when he has a few pieces of 
paper to play with, but surely you can see the difference between a Goldfire 
project with an investment of £5,000 and a USB project with an investment of 
about £100.

That is a fifth of the cost of the AA signposting at QLis21, less than the 
cost of the beads for the natives Phone Trees and less that the cost of 
the Gay T-shirts.

Do we really have to wait for the great Quanta beast to arise from its 
hibernation and slowly creak into bureaucratic action? This is something 
that could have been settled over a weekend with a few telephone calls or 
emails. The only paperwork that was necessary was a receipt for the cost of 
the boards and a record in the Quanta minute book,

Best wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee

2007-02-20 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin 
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee


Over the past few months officers of the QUANTA Committee have monitored 
the ql-users list (as they do) and, from time to time have discussed its 
content. They have recently been referred to by a known radical terrorist 
as traditionalists  (Which was what the membership voted for) but that 
doesn't mean we are sitting on our backsides doing nothing.

Just because I described the committee as traditional, it does not mean 
that I say you are not working hard. In your particular case your work has 
lead to considerable improvements in Quanta.

Since I am now being described as a terrorist, perhaps I should tell you 
that one of my slogans is:

If I assassinate John Gilpin tonight, Quanta will cease to exist tomorrow.

Someone wanted to know why a number of past members had resigned. I, as 
Membership Secretary know why a number of them resigned because they 
politely wrote and informed me of their decision and their reason(s).

Thanks for the effort. I shall be interested to hear the full results.

You have to accept that 86 people in two years is not just natural wastage. 
It is not happening elsewhere, and the alarm bells sounded at QL Today when 
people thought that if things are going badly for Quanta, then they must 
also be going badly for QL Today. In fact our loss of circulation last year 
was well under double figures.

Another thread I've noticed recently has been the suggested need for QUANTA 
to finance development of this or that bit of Hardware or software or 
driver or
 snip
What my Audited Accounts do tell me is that QUANTA still has an Accumulated 
Fund of over £12,000 (all will be disclosed in the next issue of QUANTA 
Magazine) and we have a committee who are prepared to listen to specific 
requests for loans or grants for QL Development.

This terrorist is on record as saying this committee has show a greater 
willingness to make use of Quanta's capital

Bye the Bye, don't expect a chat line comment like If QUANTA were to 
sponsor someone to the tune of $100 US + postage to produce immediate 
financial support. Come on you guys, tickle the keyboard ivories and ask us 
properly for what you think you need!! The worst you can expect is for this 
traditionalist committee to say  Not this time.

I can't agree with you on this one. The specific proposal was for a 
miniscule amount of money for a project that, if successful, could vastly 
improve QL possibilities. Quanta did not have to wait for a request, it 
could have responded straight away. You have taken money from traders who 
are making a substantial loss for years, while you are sitting on £12,000 in 
the bank. Surely a little something in return is not too much to ask.

Returning to the traditionalist theme. Quanta's great weakness is that it 
remains much the same in organisation, structure, finance and thinking as it 
did when it had 2,000 members. It is time to adapt to being a much smaller 
organisation.

Indeed within 12 to 18 months Quanta could become totally paralysed by its 
own constitution,

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff

2007-02-20 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Roy wood 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff


 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Phil Kett
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think we have to face the fact that the QL is a dying breed - we're
not going to get any new hardware due to costs, and new software is only
going to be developed by those already developing software. Partly
because of the cost of getting a 'modern' QL system and partly because
learning how to program such a system seems to be very, very difficult
due to a lack of tutorials or available documentation.

snip
Roy Wood's reply:

 True, many articles in QL Today which demonstrate programming techniques
 etc. are scattered throughout it's 11 volumes. I believe that all of
 these still exist in electronic form so maybe there is  some possible
 mileage in gathering all of the articles of each series together and
 either printing them off as a single volume or putting them on a CD as
 PDF files. I have no idea how much work this would be but it would be
 work so there would have to be a charge. Nevertheless it would be
 worthwhile if it got some people writing software again.
 -- 

It is also worthwhile getting hold of Dilwyn's Documentation CD. Some old QL 
Today material is on it and apaer from that it is a useful reference 
document,

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff

2007-02-20 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: George Gwilt 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff



 On 19 Feb 2007, at 19:08, Malcolm Cadman wrote:


 Can someone write an article for one of the magazines - Quanta or QL
 Today - around how to use Turbo and TurboPTR ?

 Beginning from the easy to the expert level of use.


 Sounds a good idea.

 Any volunteers apart from me?


Easier said than done. You could not describe how to use EasyPtr or QPTR in 
one article. I have had more experience of TurboPTR than most people on this 
list as I was a, not very good, beta tester. All I can say that George coped 
with almost every challenge that I threw back at him. But even I would baulk 
at the idea of writing articles on how to use it.

Good to know, however, that someone else is prepared to try.

In the meantime I don't think I am giving too too many secrets away by 
saying that George has just written an interesting article for QL Today over 
how he adapted the QPTR demo program for compilation with Turbo,

Best wishes,

Geoff




___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] USBwiz USB to serial device

2007-02-17 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] USBwiz USB to serial device


 If you Tony would help with the connectors  the list would like to  club
 together or dare I say Quanta to sponsor someone the $100 US  dollars + 
 postage
 we could find out if it will work when driven  through a serial port.


Good suggestion, Duncan. This is just the sort of thing where Quanta could 
take an initiative even if it means losing the  money.

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons

2007-02-16 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Roy wood 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons



But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only
laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one,
but I do mainly because of my QL experience of looking for solutions to
problems,
 That is easy - there is a specific bale to do it or a USB port
 replicator. I have both even though my laptop has a parallel port.


I mentioned this to raise the point that it is not only in the QL world that 
you sometimes have unusable hardware. The largest PC company in the country 
is not interested in solving problems like that as they would rather sell 
you a new printer. More usable products being dumped in landfill. At least 
we QL-ers have been good recyclers.

I just reasoned that if SH could produce a serial to parallel interface with 
all the electronics in the cable, then some bright spark could do something 
similar for a potentially bigger market.

On the specific point of USB to parallel interfaces, Maplin's are currently 
selling these as a special offer. They are obviously old stock as the 
installation information is for Windows98, but they work perfectly with XP 
once you have figured out how to install,

Best Wishes,

Geoff. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership

2007-02-16 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:05 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta membership



 Yes, it obviously very difficult to get a response back from members who
 have left.


Quanta is small enough for most of the departed to be known names. If I 
were chairman I would be wanting a list of those names for clues to why 
they have left.

Unfortunately Quanta has never really made the effort to find out anything 
about its members. The only people to do it in recent years have been John 
Southern and myself. I was on the committee at the time and neither of our 
surveys were discussed in any detail. (Mine was totally ignored, John's was 
just the reporting of the results.)

A smaller Quanta is not necessarily a bad thing. If it was more homogenous 
it would be easier for the committee to serve the members. A Quanta of just 
50 people could contribute greatly to the QL community provided they were 
active members. (And there are probably at least 50 people who attend shows 
and/or are active in subgroups.)

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons

2007-02-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Hardware and software - new horizons



 To keep an old computer going you need a reasonable user-base and a
 perceived function. The Spectrum gets continued support because it had
 masses of users to start with and it's easy and fun to write games for
 it.

Indeed. The Spectrum was a success right from the start, but the QL was seen 
by the experts as a failed computer practically from day one. It was the 
peripherals industry that turned it into a practical computer. In other 
words the QL has only survived for 23 years because people developed new 
hardware at an early stage in its life.

Those of us who went to the Sinclair show in Norwich a couple of years ago 
had a very strong impression that the Spectrum has not moved on to the same 
extent as the QL. We saw stall after stall selling Spectrum hardware and 
software that we remembered using in our Spectrum days. The only QL stall 
selling similar vintage QL software was Simon Goodwins.

 The QL
no longer has enough users to make commercial products viable,

Just as Quanta has to change if it wants to survive, so too have the 
traders.

 Then there's the lack of USB and printer support.

But just a provocative thought. Have you ever tried to connect a USB only 
laptop to a parallel printer? PC World don't know the answer to that one, 
but I do mainly because of my QL experience of looking for solutions to 
problems,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?



Well ... 2 years is a long time in computing ... :-) ... so may be some
optimism that new ideas can take seed.

And in those 2 years 86 members (28% of the membership) have said goodbye to 
Quanta. I would love to know who they were and why they did. What have the 
officers done to find out?

Best wishes,


Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?

2007-02-13 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: P Witte 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?


 As a final thought Quanta could stimulate this by making a prize (£s
 X-prize) for the first team to say design and make a  prototype processor 
 upgrade
 add on board or USB driver  or whatever,

Id vote for Quanta to fund hardware developments, that would be good for
the general ambience, even though Im unlikely to buy another piece of QL
hardware kit myself.

Much as I would like to see Quanta using its capital to fund QL development, 
I think you have to remain realistic.

At QL2004 I spoke to Nasta over how you could finance a new expansion card 
with the possibility of Quanta financing in mind. His reply was not 
encouraging.

Basically you are in an all or nothing situation. You have to first of 
design your board on paper and try very hard to make sure it will be a 
working board. Once you start to actually build the hardware, then you 
cannot talk in terms of an initial prototype and then later full production. 
This is, among other things, because the availability and price of chips in 
in constant flux.

If your paper design proves to work in practice, fine. If it doesn't you may 
be able to get it to work by a bit of tweaking. You can also be in a 
situation in which you get now return whatsoever on the capital.

In other words Quanta could give £5,000 of members' money to develop a card 
and see no return on that money whatsoever.

It would be a very brave committee who would be prepared to take that risk. 
It certainly would be grossly unfair to expect a committee of just 4 people 
to take such an important and risky decision,

Best Wishes,

Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] PC to QL transfer

2007-02-09 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dave Walker 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] PC to QL transfer



 Strange - all my PC's running XP have no problem using DD disks.


Running is not the problem. Formatting is impossible - try it and you will 
see why.
Formatting still works with QPC however,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] PC to QL transfer

2007-02-09 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David McCann 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] PC to QL transfer


 On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:59 +, Dave Walker wrote:
 There is also some software (cannot remember the name off-hand) that can 
 be
 run on a PC to handle QDOS format floppy disks.

 That's qltool: http://www.zen35309.zen.co.uk/misc/qxltool.zip
 The only catch for some QL users might be if the QL only accepts DD
 disks and the PC (like mine) HD ones.

There is a little known PE program by Wolfgang Lenerz - QLIBM - which if I 
remember correctly can handle both DD and HD disks. (Most of the other QL/PC 
disk transfer utilities cannot. It is in the Quanta library and probably 
elsewhere,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QSpread problem

2007-01-26 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QSpread problem


 Are there any people on this list who use the latest versions of
 these
 (PTRGEN 2.02, WMAN 2.05, HOT_REXT 2.29) and, if so, what are the
 experiences?
 Never been able to get v2.02 to work with any degree of reliability.
 On QDOS systems, I've always used the v2.01 set.


Thanks to everyone who helped with this problem.

I have followed Dilwyn's advice and tried QSpread with the v 2.01 set. It 
now loads and works without difficulty,

Best wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QSpread problem

2007-01-20 Thread gwicks
This is an unusual request but is there anyone who has experience of running 
a recent version of QSpread (v. 4.04) under QDOS?

The background is that one of our loyal QL Today readers has asked for help 
on this problem. He has a simple, but business QL use. His systems are the 
original mother boards and dual floppies built into cases. Tony has recently 
serviced his hardware and has everything in working order.

His software use over 20+ years has been restricted to the Psion programs, 
but about a year ago he thought he should learn more about the pointer 
environment and bought QSpread. He has been unable to get it working.

I asked him to send me a copy of his working disk. This works perfectly on 
QPC2 and Minerva and JM systems using SMSQ-E, but crashes under QDOS. On 
both of my black boxes either the machine freezes showing the padlock icon 
or resets. I have checked all the PE files and they are the latest versions.

This man is a loyal QL-er and a faithful QL Today reader and I am anxious to 
help him. Any suggestions welcomed,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] All free now, folks!

2007-01-01 Thread gwicks

As of midnight last night Just Words! ended all commercial activities. Full
versions of the last remaining commercial programs, QL-2-PC, QL- Rhymes,
Auto-Graph and Pindown can now be downloaded from the website software page.
(These programs are now freeware and not public domain.)

I have also added a simple data base of UK dialling codes to the page.

Please note the difference between ending commercial activities and closing
down. The change is in line with current QL developments. In the last few
years the commercial sector has become less important and internet support
increasingly important. This was one reason I rewrote the Just Words!
website last year.

Just Words! will still continue to set up a stall at QL shows, where the
programs will be available at nominal cost. The main visible difference will
be the disappearance of advertising in QL Today at the end of the present
contract.

http://members.lycos.co.uk/geoffwicks/justwords.htm

best wishes,

Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Copy for QUANTA Magazine.

2006-11-26 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Copy for QUANTA Magazine

At least that will leave the rest of the year free for other
 activities like PC Hurling - must challenge Dilwyns Gold medal next year!
 and Wine glass smashing, anyone want to take on the chairman?, Napkin
 stealing surely noone can beat the Other Editor and finally Vegitarian
 Duck Breeding - any guesses which Branch holds this gong?


Oh dear, John, how very dull. The Other Editor lives a far more exciting 
life.

After the Byfleet show at the beginning of November I ate in a Japanese 
restaurant in Piccadilly, and we all now know what happens in those 
establishments!

This day also had its strange happenings. I noticed the manager and my 
waitress having a whispered conversation and looking conspiratorially in my 
direction. She then asked me if I was happy to eat raw fish, and if so would 
I kindly test a new menu item for them.

Even more bizarre when I left the restaurant I noticed there was an extra 
stamp on my loyalty card. This was not the usual smiley, but the japanese 
character meaning the power to command respect.

Am I just paranoid or do I detect a link with the fact that the Chairman 
attended the show disguised in a false beard and accompanied by an aide 
carrying the Quanta nuclear case?

MI6, the KGB and the CIA are rank amateurs compared with the intrigues of 
the QL world,

Best Wishes
007¼ 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Copy for QUANTA Magazine.

2006-11-25 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Copy for QUANTA Magazine.


 John Gilpin wrote:
 Prompted by a short news item from David McCann, can I remind anyone who
 has
 anything to go into the December 2006/January 2007 Issue of QUANTA
 Magazine
 that the closure date for copy is Tuesday December 5th. 2006 - less than
 a
 week away.

 December 5th is less than a week away? Hmm, what date is it currently
 in England?


Simple explanation. When you edit a magazine, time goes a lot quicker that
it does for other people ;-)

As it happens John not only edits the magazine, but also lays it out. If I 
was in his shoes I would probably be saying that the deadline was only 3½ 
days away!

Under his management the Quanta Magazine is probably the best it has been in 
about 10 years,

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Byfleet 5th November

2006-11-01 Thread gwicks
Sorry I missed Tony's mailing about Byfleet, and thanks to Tony for 
including my details.

Just Words! will be at the show, although about an hour late as I shall be 
travelling directly from the Sin Bin.

We have a special offer at the show. All Just Words! products, including the 
commercial ones, will be available for  just £1 each. However stocks will be 
small,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Back to normal - I hope

2006-10-09 Thread gwicks
Apologies to anyone who has attempted to email me over the last two weeks 
and found I either did not reply or the email bounced back.

About a fortnight ago the email service on my server collapsed under the 
volume of spam. Emails were coming in days late and then in multiple copies. 
At times the email service was closed down completely and it was impossible 
to send out emails on my main address.

Even worse 10 days ago the server refused to give me an estimate of how long 
the problems would last. I was about to go over to another server this 
weekend, when suddenly normal service was resumed.

Beeb.net has now done what it should have done years ago and set up 
effective spam filtering. Yesterday I received just 3 spams instead of the 
normal 70 - 90. Mind you I shall miss the occasional mailing from Christmas 
Island addressed to Godlike gwicks and telling me that 900 Japanese women 
are waiting with longing in their hearts for contact with me.

Best Wishes,


Geoff



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Serious email problems

2006-09-24 Thread gwicks
Apologies to anyone attempting to email me privately. There are serious 
problems on my server at the moment.

Incoming post is subject to a delay of up to 48 hours, and that means that 
some messages could bounce back. When they do come in they often come in in 
triplicate at different times.

I am not sure if there is any effect on outgoing post,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] I'm back (to stay)

2006-09-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Phoebus R. Dokos 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: [ql-users] I'm back (to stay)


 A few messages to QLers individually...

 Geoff: My articles will resume shortly (once I unearth them from my 116
 boxes ;-)

Thanks. Jochen and I were just debating which of the two of us would remind 
you ;-)

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers

2006-09-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Alex Wells 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QLer ages - Membership numbers


 On Thursday 14 September 2006 20:43, John Gilpin wrote:
 You are quite correct (as usual) Geoff.

 Volume 23 Issue 2 April/May 2006 page 15 shows the updated total figure 
 as
 219.

 Hi John,

 I am delighted you are not letting G Wickes rattle you.

 AND

 There is no justification in extrapolations, or nasty shocks.
 More members would still be good, however!


Never forget one thing. Three or four years ago, when I was warning about 
the way shows were deteriorating, everyone ridiculed me including the 
traders and Quanta.

I was the person who got my hands dirty and did something about it. Without 
me there would have been no QL2004 and no QL is 21. They certainly would not 
have been held if it had been left to Quanta.

If people had listened to me three or four years ago we would have a larger 
and stronger Quanta today.

So Alex don't just say you want more members. Go out and get your hands 
dirty!

Best Wishes (and I mean that)

Geoff

PS. I know you don't do this Alex, but others in NEMQLUG have done. Don't 
think you can fob me off by invoking the ghost of Phil Jones. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Updated web site - postscript

2006-09-02 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Updated web site




 PS ... Are you able to make to the Byfleet Show on 5th November 2006 ?


This question was asked to Marcel, but could apply to most of us. What are 
the chances of some lectures/activities at Byfleet?

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Updated web site

2006-09-02 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Marcel Kilgus 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Updated web site


 Malcolm Cadman wrote:
 So ... what in particular is painful about IE ?

 Mainly it's inherently unsafe to use it on the internet. No IE user
 should be surprised if they catch some virus, worm or whatever. Apart
 form that it's usually slower, it doesn't have proper keyboard
 navigation, it lacks browser tabs, it doesn't recognize mouse
 gestures, the bookmarks are inferior, it doesn't allow site specific
 settings, the popup blocker is lacking, it doesn't have an ad filter,
 it doesn't include an RSS client, it doesn't maintain state (opened
 URLs) between sessions, when it crashes you cannot just continue to
 work where you left off, there is no proper cookie management, it
 renders pages wrongly and doesn't comply to most standards, it's not
 very customizable.

 Okay, those were just the things that I could immediately come up
 with. I guess with some effort the list would be longer ;-)


You missed out the most important one. Opera can pretend to be IE, but IE 
cannot pretend to be Opera! ;-)

 I use both IE ver6 and Opera ver6, and usually IE is much the quicker at
 finding sites and downloading ... despite Opera's claim to be the
 fastest thing in West .

 Opera 6 is how old? 5 years? Unlike IE, Opera HAS been improved in the
 meantime. They're at version 9 now.


I should perhaps have mentioned my statistics were for 2005. There is some 
evidence that there are now about 4% Opera users. There were a surprising 
number of different versions in use:

Opera 5  0.1%
Opera 7.1  0.5%
Opera 7.4  0.2%
Opera 8.0  1.0%
 Opera 8.5 0.4%


Best Wishes

Geoff
 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Updated web site

2006-08-29 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Rich Mellor 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Updated web site



Geoff - just for any newbies who read this list, maybe you should have
included a link :-)

Oh shame! Oh shame! I am always rebuking other people for not putting their 
links in their emails and now I have done it myself!

http://members.lycos.co.uk/geoffwicks/justwords.htm

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Updated web site

2006-08-28 Thread gwicks
The Just Words! web site has been completely rewritten and is available for 
your inspection.

When you enter the site you are given a choice of 4 pages:

Downloads speaks for itself.

Dictionaries allows you to download any of the Just Words! range of QTYP 
dictionaries.

Help and advice covers some of the most frequent questions I have been asked 
over the years.

QL shows gives the latest details and links I have for workshops.

This is a start of a reshaping of Just Words! to bring it into line with 
present QL trends,


Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Byfleet '06

2006-08-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Ken Bain 
To: ql-users list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:31 AM
Subject: [ql-users] Byfleet '06


 Remember remember
 There will be a QUANTA Workshop on Sunday 5th of November,in Byfleet 
 Village
 Hall,presented by the London Group and Surrey Group.


This is a date to be put into your diary. The last two Byfleet shows were 
badly attended by both traders and punters. One or two of us had to do a bit 
of arm twisting at Hove to persuade Ken to try another show this year.

It is likely to be the only autumn UK show this year and the chances are 
that if you miss this you will have to wait until March/April next year.

 Please advise us if you are descended from Guy Fawkes.


As it happens there were fireworks at a Byfleet show two years ago, but 
for commitee members only. ;-)

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] BMP second release

2006-08-20 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] BMP second release


Like a PIC, but with a 14 byte header instead of 10 bytes. The extra
long word is usually a zero before the $4AFC flag.


Just out of interest, why did TT think it necessary to have both _psa and 
_pic formats? Most of us had never heard of the former until George Gwilt 
released SVSCR, although both are documented in the QPTR manual.

Officially the extra bytes are for the programmer's own use, but has anyone 
actually done this? In what circumstances would you make use of the extra 
bytes?

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Easel graphics

2006-08-07 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Rich Mellor 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Easel graphics

 Start QPC2 in QL colour mode. Start Xchange and Easel. Press F3 D(efault)
 and 4 for a 40 column display. This is then mode 8,


 Yes it is MODE 8 - but it still only handles 4 colours does it not??


Try it for yourself. Set up a bar graph in Easel, which in my case gave a 
default colour of green. Now modify that colour and one of the choices is 
yellow. If I remember rightly not all the mode 8 colours are used,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Programs using colour themes

2006-07-21 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 1:42 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Programs using colour themes


 I'm preparing an article about colour themes and intend to try to
 build a list of programs available which use System Palette colour
 themes. I'd appreciate any input from authors and suppliers if anyone
 is aware of programs other than these which can use system palette
 colour themes:


Hi Dilwyn,

Just Words! are strictly house style so use GD2 colours, but not system 
palette,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Today v10

2006-07-01 Thread gwicks
Thanks Dilwyn,and also Brian Kemmett.

I wondered what would happen after the change of editor. 
Good to see that Brian is loyal.

This is a strange experience replying from an internet cafe 
on machine that has a badly working space key.

Hope to be back in full action at the end of next week,

Best Wishes,

Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QStripper

2006-06-14 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David McCann 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject: [ql-users] QStripper


 Implementing T87 support would be a nightmare. QL2PC tries to convert
 T91 files to rtf, but the process is very uncertain. For fonts, T87 just
 puts a NUL wherever a font change occurs, and then lists the changes at
 the different offsets in the formatting information. Unfortunately, when
 you alter a file, stray NULs get left behind: T87 ignores them, but they
 confuse QL2PC terribly. When I converted my T91 files to OpenOffice, I
 had to take them over as plain text and reformat. And that's just fonts
 -- heaven knows what T87 does with its paragraph and page information.
 And don't bother to ask Fred!


Indeed a good explanation of the problem and exactly the reason that QL2PC
has limited functionality with Text87 files.

Basically the file formatting of Quill and Perfection are very similar.
There are control codes for Bold On, Bold Off etc. etc. These are very easy
to find in a file.

Text87 works more like a PC word processor. When it comes to a font change
(and things like Bold On and Bold Off are regarded as font changes), a
little flag goes up to say there has been a font change. This must then be
recorded somehow in all the formatting information at the end of the file.

Dave Walker wrote an extensive guide to the fomatting of all types of QL
files, but even he appealed for help on Text87 formatting.

BTW Norman, I assume you have the accented characters translation codes,
but, if not, I can let you have the ones QL2PC uses,

Best wishes

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-13 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

 I can't understand your comment about Manchester always being a difficult
 location for a show. It has a brilliant transport network of motorways, 
 long
 and short distance bus routes and a high speed tram service. It is the 
 very
 hub of the rail network and the International Airport is well within
 striking distance of the chosen venue..


I am sorry but you are looking at this from the point of view of a 
Manchurian and not an outsider.

But before I continue let me make it clear that I fully support shows in 
Manchester and if you can think back 3 years when were talking of a 
prestigious international event (QL2004) I was highly in favour of 
Manchester for the event and practically everyone else against.

I have been to the last four shows in Manchester and as far as both 
accommodation and transport are concerned all have been on a scale that 
started with difficult and ended with total nightmare. The nearest 
hotels to the venue are usually fully booked and two years ago I was quoted 
£60 for 2 star accommodation. I know other people who abandoned plans to go 
to Manchester that year for just that reason. I know this is not NEMQLUG's 
fault, but it is a handicap for you in organising the show. Perhaps the best 
you can do is try to pick away game weekends. Remember is practically the 
only venue for the regular shows where more people need overnight 
accommodation than don't need it.

I will concede that you have good motorway connections both to Manchester in 
general and the Endeavour in particular. Probably the best with the 
exception of Byfleet. However for some travellers the presence of those 
wonderful hills in the Peak District stuck on the west of Manchester can 
lengthen some journeys.

Public transport is not as rosy as you say. Manchester may be a major rail 
head, but the long distance operator is Virgin, notorious for its high fares 
and unreliability. Don't forget the two Scottish attendees abandoned plans 
to come by train and came by air instead. People coming via Sheffield soon 
find that both Central and Northern Trains only run 3 coach trains and often 
just 2. Last time I couldn't even get on the first train and only managed 
the second by sitting in the vestibule.

Public transport within Manchester is also good, but not to the Endeavour. 
If you don't agree with that, how come you have never been able to tell me 
how to get to the scout hut by public transport?

I stress again this is not a reason to stop holding shows in Manchester. 
Indeed I would insist that you continue to do so, but I think you should 
realise it is not just a case of apathy --- although that plays a part in 
the poor attendance --- it is also a matter of people having to make an 
extra effort to get there,

Best Wishes,

Geoff

 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Wkshop locations

2006-06-13 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:49 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Wkshop locations


 Where is the centre of gravity of members or possible attendees ?

 Certainly Manchester is not as peripheral as Portsmouth or Hove, but from
 outside the only useful spots would be London or Brum.


The difference between you and I,  Mr. Tubbs, is that you are a theorist and 
I am a pragmatist.

The thing that determines the actual location of shows is that some poor 
bugger has to organise them. and present shows are where people are prepared 
to do the work.

Running a show is much more complicated than people think and a good deal 
more than just a hall with tea and coffee.

Look at the requirements of a hall alone:

1: It should be within easy access of a motorway.
2: It should be accessible by public transport.
3: It has to be a reasonable price.
4: It has to have adequate parking facilities.
5: It has to have easy access for loading and unloading.

(The last three of these rule out many inner city locations - you should 
talk to Malcolm Cadman about the problems he has had trying to find suitable 
halls in London.)

6. There have to be at least two rooms - one for the main event and the 
other for lectures.
7: There has to be an adequate number of electrical sockets to avoid 
irresponsible daisy chaining.
8: There have to be adequate catering and toilet facilities.
9: There has to be an adequate supply of tables and seating.

All the above means that it is very difficult for Quanta to organise shows 
centrally as they need people with local knowledge and enthusiasm to find 
suitable locations.

After the hall there are numerous other logistical problems including the 
catering provision and insurance.

Personally I would love to see a show in the Midlands, but it is up to the 
people in the Midlands to make the first moves,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-07 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] get back on topic


 I still don't understand the caption about 'hanging two dwarves' -
 could one of you enlighten me?

Neither do I!


 How did the Hove show go on the 28th May?


Quite a good show. Attendance about 30 with a good deal of mixing. Two 
welcome faces were Bill Richardson and Roger Godley. Bill has practically 
sold all his stock and half his stall was dedicated to anti-EEC propaganda.

Roger didn't give the promised talk, but was kept quite busy with informal 
groups looking at his work.

Hugh Rooms gave an interesting talk on GSP via the QL with a practical 
demonstration and Roy was able to demonstrate the QDT file manager. This 
lead to an informal discussion on who wants to use QDT and who not and a 
suggestion that it could have the potential to take over from QPAC2.

Catering up to the usual high standards. We also discussed with Ken Bain the 
possibility of a London/Byfleet show in the Autumn,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] get back on topic

2006-06-06 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] get back on topic


 must...

 Having just got back and seen the latest QL today, who have I upset,
 seeing as Roy and Geoff seem to have taken every opportunity possible
 to have a go at me???


Actually I thought you got off rather lightly. The Senior Statesman was 
meant seriously and was a compliment. The other title took me a good half 
hour's research in Chesterfield Library.

I was more worried about upsetting others. The first paragraph must have 
lost us all our Manchester readers. I thought Roy would object to being 
described as an ANCIENT rocker. Sarah is not yet back from holiday, but 
she will remind me once again that she is a southerner and not a northerner.

The one person who did complain, although he assured me that an apology was 
not necessary was Tony. He tells me that he always sings innocently, but 
this time it was in a chamber orchestra and not the church choir.

BTW there is still time to subscribe to QL Today to get the gripping account 
of the Hove Show,

Best Wishes,
Geoff

PS Those of you who are members of Quanta will notice that the last QL Today 
advert was months out of date. This was a mistake by Quanta and not Roy who 
prepares the advert. He had sent a new one, and received an acknowledgement, 
but Quanta still used the old one. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Jochen - Private Message

2006-06-06 Thread gwicks
Sorry to use the list to convey this private message.

For some reason emails to Jochen are bouncing back, in my case with messages 
that I am on a database as a spammer.

I have replied to your email about Quanta with a copy to Roy. Perhaps Roy 
could forward this,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quill to PDF convertor ?

2006-05-06 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quill to PDF convertor ?


 It can't be that difficult ... I have a freeware program on RISC OS
 called appropriately enough AntiWord.  Which takes any M$ Word file
 and converts it in to plain text or HTML.

 Very useful it has proved to be.

 It seems to cope with any version of a Word.doc too.

 Anyway, with QPC2 it is easy to copy over a Quill_doc into a Quill.doc
 or a plain text file to the DOS C: Drive, and import it in to M$ Word.

 The version of M$ Word that I have, dated 2002, has a file converter
 that requests how to treat imported formats.


It is fairly easy to transfer text between different word processors 
including between PC and QL ones. However not everyone is disciplined and a 
lot of PC users just assume that everyone can read Word files and import 
them into other programs.

If a Word.doc contains graphics or unusual formatting such as columns, these 
can be quite difficult to import into other (even PC) programs.

Dare I say it, but one of the worst offenders was Quanta who seem to have a 
love affair with MS Word - the committee must sleep with a copy of it under 
their pillows.  We have embarked on a program of re-education, some of us by 
gentle persuasion and others by brute force,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] printer problem (OT)

2006-04-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] printer problem



 - Original Message - 
 From: Robert Newson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 8:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [ql-users] printer problem


 According to the bottle I have it contains the following:
 Virgin Caster Oil BP 2.5%v/v, methyl salicylate BP 0.5%v/v, Diethyl
 Phthalate BP 2.0%v/v, industrial methylated spirit BP 95%v/v.

 So it's mainly Industrial Methylated Spirit.


Actually you can also drink it (but don't try that at home!) One of the 
first jobs I ever had was in an experimental residential project for skid 
row drunkeness offenders. It was a crazy job. One moment you were dealing 
with a violent drunk and the next helping a government minister with a 
speech. I even got a mention in an official House of Commons report. I was 
the most junior member of the team that mainly consisted of top 
psychiatrists and other experts. I learnt a lot in 18 months in that job 
that was valuable in later life.

I still remember coming back from holiday to find my colleagues had placed 
all the confiscated bottles of  jack, as it was known, by my bedside,

Best Wishes,
Geoff

PS Try diluting it with water - then it looks just like milk. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Tut! Tut! Quanta

2006-03-19 Thread gwicks
Could we have a little consistency over the Manchester workshop and
AGM please?

In your last Quanta Magazine advert and in your next QL-Today advert the
show times are:

Sat: 10.00 - 5.00
Sun: 10.00 - 5.00

In your advert in Tony's Eindhoven email and on the Quanta website the times
are:

Sat: 12.00 - 5.00
Sun: 10.00 - 4.00

I assume the latter is correct, but it's a bit hard on the members and
non-members who have no email or internet contact,

Best wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL disk transfer

2006-03-16 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones 
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL disk transfer



 4. Once you've transferred the archived QDOS Unzip to QL system, how
 to unpack it when you don't have an unzip (the Chicken and Egg
 situation)! (i.e. explain Jonathan's
 self-extract routines in simpler terms and what to do when it stops
 halfway through self-extraction when you have to type in commands to
 get it going again)


Just another point on this discussion. No disrespect to Jonathan intended, 
but his is the last site I would send someone to who knows nothing about QL 
unzipping. It is just too technical for most of us. That is why I prefer the 
old fashioned method of just sending the enquirer a disk. Once he has that 
unzipping is usually no problem at all - just a couple of commands to learn.

The big problems come, as Dilwyn says, when the enquirer has a system that 
cannot read and write to PC disks. This is a nightmare situation and you 
almost have to tailor your advice to the individual according to technical 
knowledge, apparatus and available software. Fortunately most people who 
download have upgraded to QPC2 and this is much less a problem than it was 
formerly,

Best Wishes,


Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL disk transfer

2006-03-15 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones
To: QL Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL disk transfer


 In terms of the sort of query I was raising, most people in this
 situation seem to manage handling Unzip reasonably well, where people
 seem to get stuck seems to be:

 1. Getting the downloaded software to a QL, whether it be via floppy
 disk, serial link or whatever.

 2. Having downloaded Unzip onto a PC, how to get it onto a QL,
 unpacked (without an existing copy of Unzip, the catch 22 situation)
 even before you get to the point of unzipping something!

 Jonathan Hudson has documented how to self-extract Unzip, even to the
 point of explaining what to do when it stops half done as it does on
 some systems.

There is quite a simple solution to the chicken and egg problem with unzip.
Just send the enquirer a disk with it on. Most of us have a stock of old DD
disks we no longer use. Just wrap one in bubble foam, put in a  cheap
envelope with a second class stamp. I've done it many times.

I have also successfully sold many copies of QPC2. When someone asks for my
help in transferring files to a PC because they are abandoning the QL, I
send them a copy of the QPC2 demo disk. Often the next stop for them is Roy
or Jochen.

Sometimes the old fashioned solutions work best,

Best wishes,

Geoff

 PS What about a nice little challenge for Quanta? Investigate the 
possibility of a telephone line at all shows and then offer a download 
facility for those members who cannot access the internet!


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Nightmare scenario

2006-02-22 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Nightmare scenario



 How about making the program and toolkit available somewhere so we could
 take a look at it? Id be willing to have a go, and so may others.


Thanks to all of you for your offers of help. I may come back to you at a 
later stage. I think the best way of helping the person is to steer him 
towards other more modern programs. The big problem is whether I can convert 
his files into a readable form for other programs. In theory I think this is 
possible, but until I get a few sample files to try I can't be sure in 
practice.

Also at this stage I am not sure of the extent of his QL and PC knowledge, 
but I can enquire into this when I have seen if the above is possible,

Best Wishes,

Geoff Wicks 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Nightmare scenario

2006-02-21 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Nightmare scenario



 Supercharge was the early version of Turbo, I believe.

 The user probably needs to ensure that a version of the relevant Toolkit
 is also installed and present which may be the one supplied at the time
 the program was charged or compiled.


A kind suggestion, but unfortunately it does not help. Supercharge had its 
own extensions rather like the Turbo Toolkit, but when you attempt to load 
these you get an error message not found. Strange but if you then type 
CONTINUE, the program appears to work, but you cannot load, save or print.

The person concerned is a black box user who has made the effort to upgrade 
to QPC2 so you make the extra effort to try to help him,

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26

2006-02-21 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: François Van Emelen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26


Here is my list of most used programs:
  Qspread v. 4.03
  QD v.b.01
  QPAC1 v. 1.00
  QPAC2 v. 1.42
  Easyptr 4.09
  Agenda v. 1.09
  Basic Linker v. 2.07
  QPC2 v. 3.30
  Wined v. 1.26
  Fifi v. 4.30
  Suqcess v. 2.03
  Qtyp2 v. 2.04
  QDT  v.1.00r
  DataDesign
  LineDesign
  QL2PC  and STIJL check
  Multi sprite viewer and Menu viewer P. Witte
  ProwesS/Proforma
  QLDBAS v 1.11

This could be the start of a very long list.

I think this could apply to all of us. Frankly I would find it very 
difficult to decide which are the 10 programs I use most - it all depends on 
whether my main activity at any one time is writing articles or program 
development.

Now that nice Mr. Gates gives us this information in Windows XP. My most 
used PC program is called QPC2. Is there anyone out there who also uses it?


 5: Don't be naive enough to think that you will get replies to emails if 
 you
 send them out. Tony Firshman has been doing email shots advertising shows
 for almost 6 years and I have been doing snail mails for 2 years. Some
 traders, including software traders, have never given us a single reply to
 our emails asking for their copy. (Quanta used to be one of the worse
 offenders until you came along, John. For your efficiency we are very
 grateful.),

I didn't know we (users) were supposed to comment react or reply
to those.

Users are not necessarily expected to reply to emails, but traders are. 
Before QL is 21 Tony Firshman sent out his usual email and Quanta fully 
funded a snailmail to the rest. In other words traders had the opportunity 
of free advertising to every known QL-er in the UK. We got a better response 
than usual, but still not all traders replied,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26

2006-02-18 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26


 We are all aware of the failings of the various QUANTA committees, Geoff.
 Why not send me a list of your popular software (showing latest versions 
 of
 each package, whether there are different versions for differing QL
 platforms, where they can be obtained and how much etc.) and see if this
 will start off my new feature.

 I note what you say regarding the changes of topics/subjects on this list. 
 I
 had hoped to be in contact with the authors or tinkerers themselves rather
 than have to extract confused info off the list.


1: I am not going to send you the details, but here are the statistics.

On my hard disk I have 46 programs installed. 31 of these are used 
regularly.

14 are commercial programs. This is the easy bit as there are only two 
traders involved. (Actually 3 but Jochen and Roy sell the same range.)  6 of 
the programs are technically commercial, but now no longer available.

8 are Just Words! programs, either commercial or freeware.

5 are my own programs, of which 2 are in PD libraries.

19 are freeware/ public domain programs with 14 different authors.

That is a total of 17 people you would have to contact in my case.

2: I doubt if I am a typical QL user. There are many more commercial and 
freeware programs in common use.

3: The tendency in the last few years has been a move away from commercial 
software into public domain/freeware. This is especially so of much GD2, 
sprite and PE development software. In other words it would not be a matter 
of contacting a few traders, but instead a lot of individuals. Realistically 
we are talking of a full time QL task for someone.

4: Suppose we restrict our choice to only popular software. Try a little 
test. Ask 20 people to send you a list of their 10 most popular programs and 
see what the final total comes to.

Even better let people on this list give their 10 most popular programs.

5: Don't be naive enough to think that you will get replies to emails if you 
send them out. Tony Firshman has been doing email shots advertising shows 
for almost 6 years and I have been doing snail mails for 2 years. Some 
traders, including software traders, have never given us a single reply to 
our emails asking for their copy. (Quanta used to be one of the worse 
offenders until you came along, John. For your efficiency we are very 
grateful.),

Best Wishes,

Geoff

 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26

2006-02-18 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26


 I don't routinely keep a list of what versions of all programs I'm at,
 but I'm sure given a day off I could come up with a list of my
 software versions.


I don't either and it would take me quite a time to compile a list of the 
latest JW versions. Now think of the problem traders like Jochen and Roy 
would have. This makes it even more likely that you wold not get replies to 
emails.

This is a suggestion that crops up quite often, but it has never happened in 
practice, perhaps with good reason.

Of course, Quanta could set a good example by publishing in the magazine the 
version numbers of every program in the Quanta library ;-).

Best wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Nightmare scenario

2006-02-18 Thread gwicks
This is a very long shot.

I have been contacted by a Quanta member who has just upgraded to QPC2 and 
he asked for help in running a very old program.

The program is so old that it was compiled using Supercharge and the author 
tells me the source code is no longer available.

The problem seems to be that QPC2 does not recognise the Supercharge 
extensions. As I wrote this really is a long shot, but has anyone experience 
of running Supercharged programs on QPC2?

Best Wishes,

Geoff Wicks



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Software versions was Sedit 2.26

2006-02-16 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Sedit 2.26


I am getting hopelessly lost and confused regarding what the current 
version
 of which programme is the latest and which platform(s)  it runs on.

 Would it be an idea to include a Software Updates Page in the QUANTA
 Magazine listing all the popular applications, what their latest version 
 is,
 the platform(s) it runs on, where it's available from and how much it 
 costs?
 Clearly this will mean some regular correspondence between the 
 tinkerer(s)
 and the editor but may help a number of people who do not have 
 www.access
 from their Black box QLs and therefore rely on hard written publications 
 to
 keep their interests alive.


A fine idea in theory, but I suspect it will not work in practice. I am now 
writing my third news section for QL Today, and have discovered there are 
only a handful of people who send their news items to the magazine. At one 
stage I thought I would have to make up the news for the last issue:

Bill Gates ate my hamster (Sorry an in-joke few will understand)

In practice most of QL Today news is gleaned from this list, but I also have 
to do a little spying at shows etc. Given that many discussions on this list 
are rambling and off topic or the topic changes it can be quite difficult to 
decide what is relevant and what not.

I wonder how well Quanta can learn to sniff out the important news. I 
stopped sending Just Words! news to Quanta some time ago because it just did 
not get printed. I also never send review copies of programs to Quanta. Of 
my last four new products Quanta has produced a review of only one. And that 
was an initiative from someone who had bought it at a show. I don't waste my 
time on unproductive work,

Best Wishes

Geoff

PS If any one is wondering if the above is personal or official, it is 
neither. I resigned from all my Quanta duties a fortnight ago. 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Today 20 years ago...

2006-01-23 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Ralf Reköndt 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Today 20 years ago...


 Hi Geoff,

 This raises the point that I raised in my last personal statement. Two
 members of the present committee are retiring and unless Quanta gets new
 blood on the committee - and there are only 10 nomination days left - 
 then
 it could be too small to be viable.

 Seems to be the most important point to me, isn't it? I think, QUANTA is 
 too
 much overloaded with jobs and election jobs.


I am not sure what you mean by election jobs. When you handle almost 
£5,000 of members' money per year, you have to have official things like 
elections, reports and auditors. Otherwise you have hit the nail on the 
head. Quanta has to get down to determining its core tasks and stop 
indulging in fantasy schemes for which it has neither the skills nor the 
resources to implement.

When I read the chairman's report last year, I was shocked by the number of 
things he promised that Quanta couldn't deliver and hasn't delivered. To be 
quite honest I was relieved not to be elected chairman, and when I 
congratulated the winner I had the hypocritical politician's smile on my 
face, but underneath I was smugly thinking You silly bugger - now you've 
got to implement your promises.

I have not enjoyed sitting on the committee and hearing all the wild ideas 
about a revamped website, with passwords and restricted areas and ideas for 
a chat room for Quanta members only, knowing the committee were unable to do 
a simple thing like keeping the site up to date,

Best Wishes,

Geoff (privately)



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QPC Print - Document CD

2006-01-10 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Cadman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection, QPC2 and QPC Print


 Could be worth collating all this information that is coming through
 about printer drivers for publication in the Quanta magazine ... it is
 an issue that seems to exercise everyone.


This is a good way of raising a matter that Jochen and I had already decided 
to sound out in the group.

We have had a request from a QL Today reader for a QPC Print troubleshooting 
article. We would really like to do this, but we have a problem that neither 
us have had much experience of QPC Print problems. Jochen has had just two 
requests for help and I have received only one via Quanta. I also offered to 
organise troubleshooting sessions at both the Eindhoven International and 
the Portsmouth QL is 21 shows last year, but not a single person reacted.

In general I have the impression that QPC Print has been a remarkably 
trouble free program.

We would like to hear from anyone who has had a comment to make, either over 
installation or use. Have people who used to use HP codes had problems 
switching over to Epson?

Also we would like to hear about any modifications you have had to make to 
printer drivers to get then to run under QPC Print. Obviously one area that 
needs attention is printing from Archive, but I don't know of any others.

Please send any comments direct to QL Today using the email address inside 
the front cover.

On the separate matter, Dilwyn need not apologise for faults in the QL 
Documentation CD. It has been very much appreciated by the readers and there 
is so much information on it that it was inevitable there would be a few 
faults.

Can I just add that there was no work for me in producing the CD? All the 
hard work was done by Dilwyn, Jochen and Roy.  (Just think of how much time 
it took to copy a CD for every reader!) As far as Roy is concerned I don't 
think people always realise how much work there is for him on the 
distribution side of QL Today. Also thanks to Bruce Nicholls who proof reads 
every issue,

Best Wishes,

Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] sudoku

2006-01-09 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Norman Dunbar
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] screenshoots


SNIP


 In addition, Geoff, I have *almost* got a working Sudoku generator giving 
 the options of easy, medium, hard and bloody hell - I even generate an 
 unsolvable grid with only 4 blank spaces :o)

 Watch this space .


I warn you I am a very harsh taskmaster when it comes to Sudoku generating 
programs. There is one on the current issue of Computer Active which uses 
Excel. I have had a look at it and am not impressed. It uses techniques for 
generating grids that I had experimented with for the QL and rejected as not 
be true Sudoku. It also determines difficulty level by the number of numbers 
left in the grid although this is only one of the factors.

Most Sudoku puzzles I have seen have between 25 and 35 numbers on the grid. 
The Computer Active one had 45 Easy; 36 Medium ; 27 Difficult.

I shall look forward to receiving your Sudoku generating article before the 
deadline date 19th February 2006 ;-)

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QL Today Sudoku

2006-01-03 Thread gwicks
I have had a complaint from a reader that the last line of Ian Pine's sample 
input file is missing.

For those who need it, it is:  010407030,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] screenshoots

2006-01-01 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Michael Grunditz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] screenshoots



 - Original Message - 
 From: Michael Grunditz
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 6:24 PM
 Subject: [ql-users] screenshoots


 Hi

 Is there a way to convert q40 screenfiles to any other format,
 jpeg,bmp,etc either on linux or on qdos ?


 To answer this we really need more information on the type of files, but
 I  am assuming they are mode 4 or mode 8 screens in _pic format.

 It is truecolor hires snapshots taken with the launchpad util.


Thanks. If you are a QL-Today reader, you will find some help on the Insider 
Disk that came with the last issue. Go to the folder gd2conv for a basic 
program to convert mode 32 screens to bmp. In the text are suggested, but 
untested, changes you can make to the program to convert mode 33 screens to 
bmp.

Just a word of warning. There is an error in line 270. Amend this to:

270 GET #3, temp% : ql_bpl=temp%

Best wishes,
Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Enhanced Pop

2005-12-26 Thread gwicks
Even better news. We have another article from Per coming up in issue 4 on 
using digital sound in your programs.

Please let me know of there are other topics on some of the newer 
programming possibilities you would like covered. Then I can start twisting 
a few arms,

Best wishes,
Geoff

- Original Message - 
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Enhanced Pop


 The Hinting article was excellent. Thank you very much for that. I
 hope to use hinting in my programs next year, now that I know how to!
 Where hinting excells is in programs which make heavy use of icons
 (e.g. QD) which you don't use often enough to get to know what they
 do. Rest the pointer over the icon for a little while and the 'help'
 bubble (or 'hint') magically appears to tell you in *words* what that
 icon does.
 -- 
 Dilwyn Jones



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] [RE] Psion PC Four (XChange on PC)

2005-11-27 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: P Witte
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] [RE] Psion PC Four (XChange on PC)


Sadly, they dont appear to be entirely file-compatible with the QL 
versions,
so rather pointless to have them..

There was a way of transferring files between Xchange for different systems 
rather like a simple form of RTF. In Quill you could save or load a file via 
F3 F3 (for the second command screen) T for Transfer and then either save or 
load. The extension for transferred files was _qlt.

Has anyone any experience of using it?

I first heard of this some years ago when someone suggested it as a way of 
transferring files from a PC to a QL. It is one of the many things on  my 
to do list that has long been forgotten.

If you knew the format of a _qlt file it might be possible to write a filter 
to convert rtf or html files into _qlt and then load them via Quill into any 
QL word processor. IIRC conversion of rtf or html commands into _qlt would 
probably have been fairly simple, but that the main problem was that a _qlt 
file had information about the file size that was only applicable to the 
Psion programs,

Best Wishes,

Geoff 


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


  1   2   3   >