Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Could you please provide sipp’s trace message too? -trace_msg : Displays sent and received SIP messages in scenario file name_pid_messages.log On 19 Oct 2014, at 17:55, kaan.dan...@gmail.commailto:kaan.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am building a testbed with IMS-Bench - OpenSIPS - OpenIMS . In the call scenario, I am building an ACK message and sending it from IMS bench to OpenSIPS. But in the ACK message from IMS bench to OpenSIPS, route part is truncated . Related part of the script and wireshark log of ACK message is below. It seems a limitation in IMS Bench. Are there any workaround for this limitation? Kind regards, Kaan related part of ims bench ims_uac.xml script == !-- By adding rrs=true (Record Route Sets), the route sets are -- !-- saved and used for following messages sent. -- recv response=200 rrs=true /recv send ![CDATA[ ACK [next_url] SIP/2.0 [last_Via:] Max-Forwards: 70 [routes:] From: [field0] sip:[field0]@[field1];tag=[pid]SIPpTag00[call_number] [last_To:] Call-ID: [call_id] CSeq: 1 ACK Content-Length: 0 ]] /send ACK from IMS bench to OpenSIPS = No. TimeSourceDestination Protocol Info 2255 32.328365 192.168.2.11 192.168.2.141 SIP Request: ACK sip:subs002590@192.168.2.11:9590;transport=UDP Frame 2255 (635 bytes on wire, 635 bytes captured) Ethernet II, Src: Vmware_d2:6a:2a (00:0c:29:d2:6a:2a), Dst: Vmware_22:e0:4c (00:0c:29:22:e0:4c) Internet Protocol, Src: 192.168.2.11 (192.168.2.11), Dst: 192.168.2.141 (192.168.2.141) Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) Total Length: 621 Identification: 0x5204 (20996) Flags: 0x04 (Don't Fragment) Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: UDP (0x11) Header checksum: 0x6093 [correct] Source: 192.168.2.11 (192.168.2.11) Destination: 192.168.2.141 (192.168.2.141) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 9048 (9048), Dst Port: dsmeter_iatc (4060) Source port: 9048 (9048) Destination port: dsmeter_iatc (4060) Length: 601 Checksum: 0x3460 [correct] Session Initiation Protocol Request-Line: ACK sip:subs002590@192.168.2.11:9590;transport=UDP SIP/2.0 Method: ACK [Resent Packet: False] Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.11:9048;branch=z9hG4bK-3672-12-4 Transport: UDP Sent-by Address: 192.168.2.11 Sent-by port: 9048 Branch: z9hG4bK-3672-12-4 Max-Forwards: 70 [truncated] Route: sip:192.168.2.141;lr;ftag=3672SIPpTag0012, sip:m...@pcscf.open-ims.test:4060;lr, sip:m...@scscf.open-ims.test:6060;lr, sip:m...@scscf.open-ims.test:6060;lr, sip:m...@pcscf.open-ims.test:4060;lr,sip:192.168.2.141;lr;f From: subs002048 sip:subs002...@open-ims.test;tag=3672SIPpTag0012 SIP Display info: subs002048 SIP from address: sip:subs002...@open-ims.test SIP tag: 3672SIPpTag0012 To: subs002590 sip:subs002...@open-ims.test;tag=3672SIPpTag0113 SIP Display info: subs002590 SIP to address: sip:subs002...@open-ims.test SIP tag: 3672SIPpTag0113 Call-ID: 12-3672@192.168.2.11mailto:12-3672@192.168.2.11 CSeq: 1 ACK Sequence Number: 1 Method: ACK Content-Length: 0 Windows Posta'dan gönderildi -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users Bu e-posta mesajı ve ekleri gönderildiği kişi ya da kuruma özeldir ve gizlidir. Ayrıca hukuken de gizli olabilir. Hiçbir şekilde üçüncü kişilere açıklanamaz ve yayınlanamaz. Eğer mesajın gönderildiği alıcı değilseniz bu elektronik postanın içeriğini açıklamanız, kopyalamanız, yönlendirmeniz ve kullanmanız kesinlikle yasaktır ve bu elektronik postayı ve eklerini derhal silmeniz gerekmektedir. NETAŞ TELEKOMÜNİKASYON A.Ş. bu mesajın içerdiği bilgilerin doğruluğu veya eksiksiz olduğu konusunda herhangi bir garanti vermemektedir. Bu nedenle bu bilgilerin ne şekilde olursa olsun içeriğinden, iletilmesinden, alınmasından, saklanmasından ve kullanılmasından sorumlu değildir. Bu mesajdaki görüşler gönderen kişiye ait olup, NETAŞ TELEKOMÜNİKASYON A.Ş.’nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. --- This e-mail and its attachments are private
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Please try in following way that is worked for me,
recv request=INVITE crlf=true
action ereg
regexp=([a-z0-9]+[.][a-z]{3}$)|([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
search_in=hdr header=Contact:
check_it=true assign_to=5/exec command=echo Contact header
IP/FQDN= [$5]from_list.log/
from_list.log
first run with -Contact sip:sipp@10.54.80.7, log file content as follows.
Contact header IP/FQDN = 10.54.80.7
2nd run with -Contact sip:s...@sonusnet.com, log file content as follows.
Contact header IP/FQDN = sonusnet.com
I think SIPP support for regular expressions is not as powerful as python.
Best Regards,Sakharam Thorat.
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:14:15 +1200
From: idkpmil...@sip2serve.com
To: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi Sakharam,
Thank you for the suggestions but the regex I am tryiung to construct is one
that works in sipp for both cases not only one case at a time.
using your IP address regex and stripping away the unwanted port match I added
that to the regex and it did not provide and error when an IP address is
presented as the hostpart of the URI but neither did it provide a match :-(
here is what I tried:
!-- Check host is example.com OR an IP address --
ereg
regexp=@(example.com)|([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
search_in=hdr
header=Contact:
case_indep=true
check_it=true
assign_to=discardR15,cHostR1
/
log message=REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST = [$cHostR1]/
warning message=REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST = [$cHostR1]/
Here are the log files and the error.log as you canb see the entry is blank.
sipp: The following events occured:
2014-07-0718:55:25.3262221404716125.326222: REGISTER 1 TO URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3265361404716125.326536: REGISTER 1 TO URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3266461404716125.326646: REGISTER 1 FROM URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3267241404716125.326724: REGISTER 1 FROM URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3268381404716125.326838: REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST
= .
2014-07-0718:55:25.3270071404716125.327007: REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI USER
= 93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3308561404716125.330856: REGISTER 2 TO URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3309871404716125.330987: REGISTER 2 TO URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3311091404716125.331109: REGISTER 2 FROM URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3311861404716125.331186: REGISTER 2 FROM URI USER =
93531265.
and next the log file generated:
REGISTER 1 TO URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 1 TO URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 1 FROM URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 1 FROM URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST =
REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 2 TO URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 2 TO URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 2 FROM URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 2 FROM URI USER = 93531265
Thanks
Paul
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
___
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft___
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Problem is not with your regular expression, you accessing wrong variable while
printing/storing log.
ereg
regexp=@(example.com)|([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
have only one capture group
(example.com) or
([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
You assigning this value as assign_to=discardR15,cHostR1 ,
whatever you extracting is assigned to discardR15 not to cHostR1, cHostR1 will
be empty. But you using cHostR1 to print in log. that's why you getting blank.
Best Regards,Sakharam Thorat.
From: sakharam.tho...@outlook.com
To: idkpmil...@sip2serve.com; sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:14:48 +0530
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Please try in following way that is worked for me,
recv request=INVITE crlf=true
action ereg
regexp=([a-z0-9]+[.][a-z]{3}$)|([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
search_in=hdr header=Contact:
check_it=true assign_to=5/exec command=echo Contact header
IP/FQDN= [$5]from_list.log/
from_list.log
first run with -Contact sip:sipp@10.54.80.7, log file content as follows.
Contact header IP/FQDN = 10.54.80.7
2nd run with -Contact sip:s...@sonusnet.com, log file content as follows.
Contact header IP/FQDN = sonusnet.com
I think SIPP support for regular expressions is not as powerful as python.
Best Regards,Sakharam Thorat.
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:14:15 +1200
From: idkpmil...@sip2serve.com
To: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi Sakharam,
Thank you for the suggestions but the regex I am tryiung to construct is one
that works in sipp for both cases not only one case at a time.
using your IP address regex and stripping away the unwanted port match I added
that to the regex and it did not provide and error when an IP address is
presented as the hostpart of the URI but neither did it provide a match :-(
here is what I tried:
!-- Check host is example.com OR an IP address --
ereg
regexp=@(example.com)|([0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3}[.][0-9]{1,3})
search_in=hdr
header=Contact:
case_indep=true
check_it=true
assign_to=discardR15,cHostR1
/
log message=REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST = [$cHostR1]/
warning message=REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST = [$cHostR1]/
Here are the log files and the error.log as you canb see the entry is blank.
sipp: The following events occured:
2014-07-0718:55:25.3262221404716125.326222: REGISTER 1 TO URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3265361404716125.326536: REGISTER 1 TO URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3266461404716125.326646: REGISTER 1 FROM URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3267241404716125.326724: REGISTER 1 FROM URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3268381404716125.326838: REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST
= .
2014-07-0718:55:25.3270071404716125.327007: REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI USER
= 93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3308561404716125.330856: REGISTER 2 TO URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3309871404716125.330987: REGISTER 2 TO URI USER =
93531265.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3311091404716125.331109: REGISTER 2 FROM URI HOST =
example.com.
2014-07-0718:55:25.3311861404716125.331186: REGISTER 2 FROM URI USER =
93531265.
and next the log file generated:
REGISTER 1 TO URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 1 TO URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 1 FROM URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 1 FROM URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI HOST =
REGISTER 1 CONTACT URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 2 TO URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 2 TO URI USER = 93531265
REGISTER 2 FROM URI HOST = example.com
REGISTER 2 FROM URI USER = 93531265
Thanks
Paul
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
___
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
___
Sipp-users mailing list
Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Yes, that should be enough - SIPp handles SIP Digest authentication by itself without requiring regexps.It might be worth logging in with an ordinary softphone (Jitsi, X-Lite, Blink) just to make sure that your username and password are correct, before you start trying to log in with SIPp. Best, Rob On 3 April 2014 16:39, Crnjanski Milos milos.crnjan...@yahoo.com wrote: hm...I am not sure, becouse I am doing as told in this document, but still getting 401... So you are saying that is should be enough just like [authentication username=foouser] ? I dont need to fix some regexp top read 401 message and to respond to nonce? Thanks Rob for everything! Regards Milos Hi Milos, http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#SIP+authentication has the documentation on this feature, and an example. Does that give you what you need? Best, Rob On 3 April 2014 16:12, Crnjanski Milos milos.crnjanski@... wrote: I have some problems with registration... First I need to understand how registration process works...First I am sending REGISTER request to my Registrar...then Registrar send 401 with nonce, encryption method, So in order to send proper registration we need to respond to this 401, especially to nonce and encryption, right? If that is correct, I would like to know do we need to specify that in scenario(with regexp e.g.) or the sipp do that by himself (recv 401 auth=true e.g.). Thanks for all the help regards Milos -- ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi Robert; Thank you for your response. Release: sipp-3.3.990 OS: GNU/Linux (Red HAt with kernel release 2.4.21-47.ELsmp) Scenario xml: uac.xml from http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#Integrated+scenarios Execution: ./sipp -sf uac.xml 47.168.76.75:5070 -r 100 -trace_stat No openssl installed. When I started with default call-rate, cumulative call-rate is still goes down starting from 10. Seems that there are some dead call msgs in the begining but when it reaches to the value of 52, do not increase anymore. I hope these are helpful. Thanks in advance. Demir. From: Robert Day r...@rkd.me.uk To: Demir Yavas demir.ya...@yahoo.com Cc: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 11:53 PM Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject) Hi Demir, Can you share the XML scenario file you're using, as well as more details about your setup (SIPp version, OS, etc)? This isn't something I've seen before but I can try and reproduce it with more detail. Thanks, Rob On 28 Feb 2014, at 21:49, Demir Yavas wrote: Hi All; I have started SIPp with call-rate 100. Cumulative call-rate is continuously decreasing as started from 100 to I think to 0(?) (after 1hour 4secs, it is 3.440). I think this is not expected behavior. I would like to learn about the reason of this behavior. Thanks in advance. Demir.-- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi Demir, Can you share the XML scenario file you're using, as well as more details about your setup (SIPp version, OS, etc)? This isn't something I've seen before but I can try and reproduce it with more detail. Thanks, Rob On 28 Feb 2014, at 21:49, Demir Yavas wrote: Hi All; I have started SIPp with call-rate 100. Cumulative call-rate is continuously decreasing as started from 100 to I think to 0(?) (after 1hour 4secs, it is 3.440). I think this is not expected behavior. I would like to learn about the reason of this behavior. Thanks in advance. Demir. -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:42 AM, manaswini.m...@gmail.com wrote: i tried using softphone instead of sipp, its working perfectly. as per ur i captured the traces, its as below INVITE sip:bob@10.50.26.207:49152 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.50.26.207:6067;branch=z9hG4bK-3356-1-3 From: alice sip:alice@10.50.26.207:6067;tag=33561 To: bob sip:bob@10.50.26.207:49152 Call-ID: 1-3356@10.50.26.207 CSeq: 2 INVITE Proxy-Authorization: Digest username=alice,realm=myvoipapp.com ,uri=sip:10.50.26.207:49152 ,nonce=66bc428c26a770205d047a5b767e450a,response=9f1c08d87105bae5be1a846b92c83e98,algorithm=MD5 There is a strange space in front of header Proxy-Authorization. I believe it is being caused by you error in aligning the message properly: INVITE sip:bob@...] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch] From: alice sip:alice@...] To: bob sip:bob@...] Call-ID: [call_id] CSeq: 2 INVITE [authentication username=alice password=alice] Contact: sip:alice@...] Max-Forwards: 70 Subject: Performance Test Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: [len] Try aligning [authentication username=alice password=alice] properly with the headers. -- Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:39 PM, raju veer raj6...@gmail.com wrote: hi all Can anyone tell me how i can send sipp messages to remote machine Just read the docs: http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Its system dependent I guess, can u check the same in a different machine ;I assume its a linux machine On a Xeon server I was able to push to almost 120 cps once On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:48 AM, vibha dear vibha_de...@yahoo.co.inwrote: Dear all, I’m using sipp as a beginner. When I make calls at cps 40 or more maximum calls get failed. Like for 40 cps I get only 7-8 successful calls. I am not able to find out why calls getting failed and how to solve out the problem. Can anyone please help me on this issue? -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Regards, SriNarayanan -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:18 AM, vibha dear vibha_de...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Dear all, I’m using sipp as a beginner. When I make calls at cps 40 or more maximum calls get failed. Like for 40 cps I get only 7-8 successful calls. I am not able to find out why calls getting failed and how to solve out the problem. Can anyone please help me on this issue? SIPp it is just a tool. It is saying the system your are testing cannot cope with this call rate. You don't blame the speedometer when it says the car cannot go as fast as you want. -- Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
hi, Check the RTP/RTCP ports and capture the UDP traces on the linux box and wireshark Thanks, Abinash On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Shalu Dhamija [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using SIPP to generate a call with RTP media. But the problem is that packets are not reaching the network as RTP packets are not seen in Wireshark. I have installed both libnet and libpcap libraries which are essential for sending the RTP packets. I have compiled SIPp to enable it with PCAP play using the following: make pcapplay But still the issue is not resolved. It would be a great help if somebody can tell me the solution for this and Please find attached the scenario file also. Regards, Shalu Dhamija - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi, It's strange. Maybe you got CPU overload on the computer running sipp? I don't see any other reasons for it. BR -- Tomasz Radziszewski Senior Software Engineer Ericpol Telecom sp. z o.o. Madalinskiego 9, 30-303 Krakow, Poland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ericpol.com/ Thank you Tomasz, but I forgot in my last post to say that I've already set -l 0.I think it should mean there's no limit to active calls, isn't it? Anyway I have made two tests using different configuration files for my SER. In the first case SER is slower than in the second and SIPp performances change. Starting SIPp with -r 1 -l 0 parameters, I've noticed in the first test an average rate of 4844 cps, in the second 7392 cps. How is it possible? Best Regards Elisa - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
For media support pcap is certainly required. I don't know what libnet is. I don't know where to get them for Solaris anymore, but sunfreeware.com may be a start. It used to be the place to get all the extra packages that you needed. Charles Monica Sam -X (monsam - WIPRO at Cisco) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/2008 06:42 AM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject [Sipp-users] (no subject) Hi , I have a Solaris server : SunOS sbc-auto5 5.8 Generic_117350-34 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 I do not have libnet or libpcap packages installed: pkginfo | grep *libnet* No match Has anyone installed SIPp with media support successfully on Solaris?If so, can you please guide me on how to install SIPp on Solaris with pcap support.Are these packages(libnet and libpcap) required?.Can you point me to the site from which I can dowload theses packages? Thanks in advance, Monica. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hi , Can u refer http://www.tech-invite.com/ I hope this will help you.. On 10/24/07, Алла Нилова [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you help me,i don't know what i should put in the field P-visited-network-id...may be you give me some examples...i just work with it?can you help me with REGISTRAR... - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Mobile: +919880696590 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
If you need to run both instances simultaneously, yes. Regards, Olivier Boulkroune -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 26 septembre 2007 20:05 À : Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : RE: [Sipp-users] (no subject) Thank you, Is that means that each instance will not monitor on the same port ?(ie : 5060) then Client must have to send each message handling on different port. Regards, PY Selon Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The call-id in the OPTIONS message probably differs from the one in the REGISTER. You may probably use two different sipp instances to achieve what you need, one for each message handling. Regards, Olivier Boulkroune -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 26 septembre 2007 10:07 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] (no subject) Hello, I would like to test SIP client with the below scenario. The problem is that SIPP doesn't capture OPTION message and then there is the following message in trace_err log : 2007-09-21 17:55:51: Aborting call on unexpected message for Call-ID 'yPMLXi-EoIf7EN7W7Cc40MW6vAMMij': while expecting 'REGISTER', received 'OPTIONS I don't understand why SIPP is waiting for REGISTER whereas OPTION is expected ? Thanks for your help. PY scenario name=TEST OPTION recv request=REGISTER /recv send retrans=500 ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK Content-Length: 0 [last_Via:] Route: sip:192.168.1.5;lr [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] Contact: sip:192.168.1.10;expires=3600;+g.3gpp.cs-voice ]] /send recv request=OPTIONS crlf=true /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 501 Not Implemented Content-Length: 0 [last_Via:] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] ]] /send /scenario -- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Hello Martin, We are aware this change brought a few problems, including broken key press handling. We are currently working fixing it. Thanks for your report, Olivier Boulkroune De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Klier, Martin Envoyé : mercredi 8 août 2007 11:35 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] (no subject) After following correction from 2007-07-12 Fix:waitpid error when using a combination of external commands and interrupts the scenario works properly, e.g. the messages are send correctly, if the combination of external commands and interrupts is used. But in the screen, where the message flow is displayed, from that point were the first message, which use that combination in the scenario, under the slot Message stays 0, while there must be 1, the result is failed call, and a message Unable to send UDP messages: Broken Pipe comes. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject)
Martin, I fixed my key press problem in the latest unstable version (2007-08-08). Could you check if yours is fixed too ? Regards, Olivier Boulkroune De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Boulkroune, Olivier (Non-HP:Atos Origin) Envoyé : mercredi 8 août 2007 12:20 À : Klier, Martin; sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [Sipp-users] (no subject) Hello Martin, We are aware this change brought a few problems, including broken key press handling. We are currently working fixing it. Thanks for your report, Olivier Boulkroune De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Klier, Martin Envoyé : mercredi 8 août 2007 11:35 À : sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : [Sipp-users] (no subject) After following correction from 2007-07-12 Fix:waitpid error when using a combination of external commands and interrupts the scenario works properly, e.g. the messages are send correctly, if the combination of external commands and interrupts is used. But in the screen, where the message flow is displayed, from that point were the first message, which use that combination in the scenario, under the slot Message stays 0, while there must be 1, the result is failed call, and a message Unable to send UDP messages: Broken Pipe comes. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
