[Bug 779109] Re: F-Spot reference hard coded
I filed a ticket upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3588 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3588 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3588 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3588 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779109 Title: F-Spot reference hard coded -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773629] Re: shotwell 0.9.2 crashes when removing a tag
Thanks for the log file and debug output. The stack trace reveals that this is related to the global menu. Unfortunately I can't reproduce this on Ubuntu Natty either in 0.9.2 or in trunk. Do you see this crash every time you remove any tag from any picture? Could you try the following? First make sure that auto-import is disabled. Start Shotwell with an empty library - you can do this by running, for example, 'shotwell -d ~/foo'. Now import a single photo. Add a tag to the photo, then remove it. Does Shotwell crash? If so, could you attach the photo here, and also tell us what the text of the tag is? ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773629 Title: shotwell 0.9.2 crashes when removing a tag -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773629] Re: shotwell 0.9.2 crashes when removing a tag
Thanks for the picture. I just tried to reproduce this again on Ubuntu Natty, but was unsuccessful. Here's what I did: 1. Start Shotwell with an empty library: SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell -d ~/foo. 2. In Nautilus, find the photo indicator_mockup.jpg that Jan attached above and drag it into Shotwell. Choose Import in Place. 3. Select the photo and press Ctrl+T. Type these tags: Gimp, Mock-Up, Indicators. 4. In the sidebar, select the Gimp tag. 5. In the main view, right click on the photo and choose 'Remove Tag Gimp from Photo'. 6. Repeat steps 4-5 for the Mock-Up and Indicators tags. When I did this, everything worked normally. I then tried the above steps again, but in step 5 instead of right clicking I chose 'Tags-Remove Tag Gimp From Photos' from the top-level menu. Again, everything worked normally. Jan, if you perform the steps above do you see the crash? If not, can you provide a sequence of steps that crashes? Are you sure you've applied all software updates to your Natty installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773629 Title: shotwell 0.9.2 crashes when removing a tag -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775512] Re: Shotwell zooms image slow and lag
I think the reporter is saying that zooming into images in general is slower in 0.9 than in 0.8. Someone already filed a ticket upstream saying he thought JPEG loading had slowed down, so let's consider this another symptom of that: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3536 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3536 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3536 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3536 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775512 Title: Shotwell zooms image slow and lag -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771841] Re: Update natty to 0.9.3
We at Yorba have tested the GNOME 3 background fix to make sure that works on Natty as well as on GNOME 3 systems such as Fedora 15. But, still, it's up to you whether to take Shotwell 0.9.3 in its entirety. By the way, we are considering another bug fix release (0.9.4) in the next week or two, so if you want to take 0.9.4 but exclude the GNOME 3 background fix you'll also need to cherry pick there as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771841 Title: Update natty to 0.9.3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770051] Re: Bad translation to Spanish visible in tree at left
Thanks to all for their attention to this. I'll now close the upstream bug. We're still undecided about whether to release a version 0.9.4, but if we do we'll merge this fix in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770051 Title: Bad translation to Spanish visible in tree at left -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770051] Re: Bad translation to Spanish visible in tree at left
Yikes: this still occurs in 0.9.3 and in trunk. I'm surprised that noone pointed this out before. I've filed a bug upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3540 . We'll fix this for 0.10. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3540 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3540 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3540 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770051 Title: Bad translation to Spanish visible in tree at left -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745002] Re: exited on abort in editing_host_page_replace_photo()
Sebastien, At Yorba, if try to reproduce a bug and are unsuccessful, we generally close it, especially if only one user has reported it. If we kept such bugs open, our bug database would grow larger and larger with lots of bugs which we can do nothing about. I do think, however, that we should start running Shotwell in valgrind as part of our testing before every release. We haven't done that much so far and I think it might reveal bugs. If we do that, perhaps we'll find a way to see this bug again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745002 Title: exited on abort in editing_host_page_replace_photo() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760399] Re: Untranslatable strings in import directory format popup
Sebastien, We recently released Shotwell 0.9.3 including a fix for this bug. I don't understand your question about blocking this fix - was it intended for Shotwell developers, or for Shotwell packagers at Ubuntu? Can you clarify? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760399 Title: Untranslatable strings in import directory format popup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770459] Re: Shotwell saves edited png with jpg extension
Thanks for the bug report. I've ticketed this upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3547 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3547 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3547 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3547 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770459 Title: Shotwell saves edited png with jpg extension -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767983] Re: Set as desktop background fails on Natty
Turns out the GConf mechanism *does* work on Natty/Unity; this was our error. We'll fix this upstream right away. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767983 Title: Set as desktop background fails on Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 767977] Re: is it a bug, shotwell taking over my places? i cannot access my folders anymore!!!!
This bug is not reproducible, the original reporter found a solution and it's not clear that it ever occurs with current versions of Shotwell (the reporter was using 0.7). Marking as invalid. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767977 Title: is it a bug, shotwell taking over my places? i cannot access my folders anymore -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 766946] Re: Shotwell should put cached thumbs in either ~/.cache or $XDG_CACHE_DIR
Storing in XDG directories is ticketed upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/421 . As noted there, Shotwell isn't yet smart enough to automatically regenerate missing thumbnails (that's http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2889), and we can't store thumbnails in a cache directory until that functionality is implemented. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #421 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/421 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2889 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2889 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/421 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766946 Title: Shotwell should put cached thumbs in either ~/.cache or $XDG_CACHE_DIR -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745831] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745831 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in raise() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745245] Re: Seahorse cannot set up SSH keys for login servers
I'm seeing this too (on Fedora 15, actually). I've filed a bug upstream here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #648224 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745245 Title: Seahorse cannot set up SSH keys for login servers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760978] Re: Shotwell's desktop file contains English translations for all languages and cannot be translated
lucas@yorba, can you investigate and comment on this? Is this a Shotwell bug or an Ubuntu packaging bug, in your opinion? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760978 Title: Shotwell's desktop file contains English translations for all languages and cannot be translated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 759011] Re: Filter on rating does not work
Thanks for the bug report. The filter options in the menu are supposed to show the search bar automatically. Unfortunately, it seems that this is broken if the search bar has never been visible in the current Shotwell session. I've ticketed this upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3490 . We'll fix this for the upcoming 0.9.2 release. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3490 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3490 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3490 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759011 Title: Filter on rating does not work -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 759011] Re: Filter on rating does not work
@Daniel: Yes. We (the Shotwell developers) are in touch with people at Ubuntu and we believe there will be time to include Shotwell 0.9.2 in Ubuntu 11.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759011 Title: Filter on rating does not work -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665006] Re: Corruption of files on export
I've marked the upstream ticket as worksforme since Michael has said he can't reproduce this in Shotwell 0.9 and since we have enough to do trying to fix the bugs we *can* reproduce. :) If this rears its head again then we can certainly reopen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665006 Title: Corruption of files on export -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756592] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in publishing_rest_support_session_construct()
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756592 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in publishing_rest_support_session_construct() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706703] Re: build fails with very recent gcc 4.6: unused-but-set-variable error
Here's a patch that fixes the build errors, assuming that you want to stay with GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS(maximum) and fix all these errors in place. ** Patch added: patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/706703/+attachment/1978027/+files/fix_unused_variable_errors.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706703 Title: build fails with very recent gcc 4.6: unused-but-set-variable error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749893] Re: Filter actions from menu or keyboard shortcuts do nothing
I can't reproduce this. I tried upgrading from Shotwell 0.8.1 to Shotwell 0.9. After the upgrade, filtering worked just fine. - You're using the filter menu on the new Find toolbar, right? - You said that the filter actions do nothing at all. So this means that Shotwell always shows all photos, no matter what you select? - Is Shotwell showing rejected photos? - If you close the Find toolbar and open it again, does that help? - If you restart Shotwell, does that help? - Is the search box working normally? Do the other buttons on the Find toolbar work normally? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749893 Title: Filter actions from menu or keyboard shortcuts do nothing -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 749893] Re: Filter actions from menu or keyboard shortcuts do nothing
OK. Not a bug. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/749893 Title: Filter actions from menu or keyboard shortcuts do nothing -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746697] [NEW] panels come forward when any fullscreen application opens a new window
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: compiz On Natty, if any application in fullscreen mode opens a new window, then the Unity panel and launcher will come to the foreground on top of the fullscreen view. To see this, open gedit, choose View-Fullscreen, then press Ctrl+F for Find. As the Find dialog appears, the Unity panel and launcher will appear too. I've also observed this behavior in Gimp and Shotwell. It probably occurs in other applications too. This also happens when logged into the classic desktop: there, the gnome-panels come to the foreground. It does not, however, happen when running Metacity instead of Compiz in the classic desktop. So it apppears that the behavior is related to Compiz. ** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746697 Title: panels come forward when any fullscreen application opens a new window -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746754] Re: no global menu for shtowell
I don't see this: on my Natty machine, the Shotwell menu appears in the global menu. I installed a daily build recently. Shotwell used to be blacklisted (i.e. excluded) from the global menu due to some compability problems, but is no longer on the blacklist. It looks like you upgraded from Maverick to Natty. Perhaps the blacklisting was somehow left in place when you upgraded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746754 Title: no global menu for shtowell -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744942] Re: not easy to get back where you were after displaying a photo
We have a ticket for this upstream: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2719 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2719 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2719 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2719 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744942 Title: not easy to get back where you were after displaying a photo -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741465] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()
Can you reproduce this crash? Does it occur every time you start Shotwell, or did it only happen once? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741465 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743465] Re: shotwell assert failure: *** glibc detected *** shotwell: double free or corruption (out): 0x0000000003b72f60 ***
Ticketed upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3413 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743465 Title: shotwell assert failure: *** glibc detected *** shotwell: double free or corruption (out): 0x03b72f60 *** -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 741967] Re: shotwell assert failure: *** glibc detected *** shotwell: corrupted double-linked list: 0x0a7aa6f0 ***
Ticketed upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3413 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3413 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741967 Title: shotwell assert failure: *** glibc detected *** shotwell: corrupted double-linked list: 0x0a7aa6f0 *** -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744959] Re: sometime displays two icons for the same date in the events view
We have a ticket for this upstream: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2748 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2748 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2748 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2748 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744959 Title: sometime displays two icons for the same date in the events view -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744949] Re: the red eyes function use is not obvious to use
When you open the red eye tool, it displays a small circle which you can move around the image to choose the spot where you want to fix red eye. Unfortunately, when the photo is dark, the red eye circle can be hard to see or practically invisible, which is confusing. I've ticketed this upstream here: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3434 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3434 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3434 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3434 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744949 Title: the red eyes function use is not obvious to use -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744946] Re: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog
You've reported two problems: 1. The adjust dialog [can't] be moved if you don't know about alt- left_click-dnd. You can simply click anywhere in the adjust dialog and drag the mouse to move it. Does this not work for you? 2. The adjust dialog appears partially off the screen. This is a problem. I've ticketed this upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3436 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3436 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3436 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3436 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744946 Title: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745002] Re: exited on abort in editing_host_page_replace_photo()
Ticketed upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3438 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3438 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3438 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3438 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745002 Title: exited on abort in editing_host_page_replace_photo() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744946] Re: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog
We didn't give the adjust window a title bar because we want it to feel like a lightweight tool window that floats on top of the main window while minimizing visual distraction. At some point we may move the adjustments into a sidebar on the right like in some other photo apps, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744946 Title: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744946] Re: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog
Oh, yes, I now see in this classic Ubuntu as well if I enable Compiz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744946 Title: the adjust dialog should be a real dialog -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744950] Re: the video display should be on by default
When you say the small icon in the right side view, I assume that you mean the Videos icon in the Find toolbar at the top of the photos view - yes? I believe that we do show videos by default. If you run Shotwell on a clean machine (e.g. after running 'gconftool --recursive-unset /apps/shotwell'), you'll see that the Find toolbar does not appear by default and that videos are shown. So I think you probably enabled the Find toolbar, pressed the Photos button (which filters the display to show only photos) and left it on by mistake - right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744950 Title: the video display should be on by default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 742225] Re: Photos published to Flickr have the wrong date/time.
Ticketed upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3426 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3426 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3426 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3426 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742225 Title: Photos published to Flickr have the wrong date/time. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 744575] Re: Thumbnails are not able to maintain the resolution of pic
I'm not quite sure I understand. Do you mean that when you click Events to see one image for each event, the images don't have quite the same resolution as the original image? That's this Shotwell bug: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2613 Or do you mean something else? ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2613 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2613 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/744575 Title: Thumbnails are not able to maintain the resolution of pic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 740274] [NEW] on Natty, resize grip overlaps zoom icon
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: shotwell On Natty, windows contain a resize grip in the lower right-hand corner. (This is actually a GTK 3 element which has been backported to GTK 2 in Natty). Because Shotwell has no status bar, this resize grip overlaps some visual elements. In particular, in the main window the resize grip overlaps the icon to the right of the zoom slider, and when a photo is viewed in full-window mode the grip overlaps the right arrow button. This might not be an issue if the resize grip were drawn with a transparent background, but it seems to draw over everything in its bounding box. (There's been some more discussion of the resize grip at bug 704105). I recommend that Ubuntu disable the resize grip in the Shotwell packaging for Natty. You should be able to do this by calling gtk_window_set_has_resize_grip() shortly after the main Shotwell window is created, which should be easy to find in the code. ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740274 Title: on Natty, resize grip overlaps zoom icon -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723465] Re: auto import of photo's hangs infinately
Yes. The fix was already present in Shotwell 0.8.90. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723465 Title: auto import of photo's hangs infinately -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734714] Re: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser
Normal Ubuntu software updates provide only critical bug fixes and minor improvements. If you want the latest versions of Shotwell or other applications on the Ubuntu desktop, you'll need to upgrade to a newer version of Ubuntu. You can do this through System-Administration-Update Manager. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734714 Title: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734714] Re: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser
Yes - that version is pretty old now. We're made 3 releases since then and are about to release 0.9. I'd recommend that you upgrade! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734714 Title: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631864] Re: shotwell doesn't find facebook existing albums
Booxter, just curious: Yorba's PPA already contains Shotwell 0.8 which includes this fix, so why did you package 0.7.2 plus this fix for your own PPA? I'd encourage anyone on Maverick who needs this fix to simply upgrade to 0.8 using Yorba's PPA. https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631864 Title: shotwell doesn't find facebook existing albums -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733920] Re: Shotwell crashes on some (bw) jpg files
The attached picture works fine in Shotwell on Natty with libexiv2 0.21.1 and libgexiv2 0.3.0. There were some crashing bugs in earlier versions of libexiv2 that affected Shotwell users - see http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/show/739 http://dev.exiv2.org/issues/show/752 I believe if you update to the latest libexvi2 and gexiv2 then everything will be fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733920 Title: Shotwell crashes on some (bw) jpg files -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734714] Re: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser
- Are you sure that you have read permission on the images in question? - What happens if you find the images in Nautilus and drag them into Shotwell? - If you double click on them in Nautilus, what happens? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734714 Title: Shotwell: Cannot import any image file - they all appear grey in the data browser -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734297] Re: when export image file on desktop with grab
I don't understand this bug report. Did you export an image from Shotwell by dragging it to the desktop? What happened differently from what you expected? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734297 Title: when export image file on desktop with grab -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733920] Re: Shotwell crashes on some (bw) jpg files
OK. If you're having trouble upgrading libexiv2 and libgexiv2 feel free to ask for help on the Shotwell mailing list (http://lists.yorba.org /cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733920 Title: Shotwell crashes on some (bw) jpg files -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579804] Re: Store/read tags inside photos
Michael, I've updated the Wikipedia page you mentioned to include Shotwell as you suggested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579804 Title: Store/read tags inside photos -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732710] Re: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen
Omer, we thought the newly expanded Shotwell preferences dialog would be OK because it's not as tall as the Nautilus preferences dialog. Does that dialog not fit on your screen either? ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #536187 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536187 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732710 Title: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732710] Re: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen
Aha - I see that's considered a Nautilus bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536187 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3320 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3320 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3320 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732710 Title: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 732710] Re: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen
I've ticketed this at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3320 Possibly too late to fix this for 0.9, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732710 Title: shotwell preference window is a little high for a netbook screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 731007] Re: Update to 0.9
Changes from Shotwell 0.8.1 to 0.8.90 include the following: - a search box that finds photos by name - buttons that filter photos by type (photo, video, RAW) or flag state - support for photos in TIFF format - support for plugins, which can add publishing destinations or new slideshow transitions to Shotwell - printing multiple photos at once (including multiple photos per page) - the user can now specify a pattern (e.g. Year/Month-Day) indicating the folders where imported photos will be placed - improved rendering for underexposed RAW photos - all drawing now done with Cairo instead of using older GDK functions - numerous small improvements and bug fixes The upcoming 0.9 release will contain bug fixes for 0.8.90. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731007 Title: Update to 0.9 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 724780] Re: shotwell crashed yesterday 24.2.2011 on importing from home directory
Robin, thanks for the bug report. Are you able to reproduce this - in other words, can you make it happen again? If not, then unfortunately there may not be much we can do since the crash report you attached doesn't give us enough information to proceed with. If you can reproduce this, could you upgrade to Shotwell 0.8 and see if the crash occurs there as well? You can upgrade by installing from our PPA as described on our Web site: http://yorba.org/shotwell/install/#binaries ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724780 Title: shotwell crashed yesterday 24.2.2011 on importing from home directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723465] Re: auto import of photo's hangs infinately
Note log file attached to the upstream ticket and continued discussion there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723465 Title: auto import of photo's hangs infinately -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720975] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify()
Thanks for the backtrace and log file. It looks like some RAW file is causing libraw to crash, but unfortunately the files you attached don't reveal which RAW file that is. As a next debugging step, let's try the following. You'll need to be able to reproduce the crash again. If necessary, you can run Shotwell with an empty scratch library (e.g. shotwell -d ~/foo) so you can import again without affecting your main library. 1. Start GDB: $ gdb shotwell 2. Run Shotwell within GDB, passing any arguments as necessary: (gdb) run -or- (gdb) run -d ~/foo 3. Import photos so that the crash occurs again. 4. From another terminal window, run this command: $ lsof -p `pidof shotwell` lsof.out 5. Attach the file lsof.out to this ticket. I hope this will reveal which RAW file is causing the problem. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720975 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723001] Re: no screensaver capability
There is no Shotwell screensaver. This is a documentation bug. The page with the wrong information is here: https://help.ubuntu.com/10.10/musicvideophotos/C/photos-slideshow.html I suspect that an older version of this page used to describe F-Spot, and someone simply replaced the word F-Spot with Shotwell without checking that this capability existed. It would be nice to have a Shotwell screensaver at some point - see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1112 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #1112 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1112 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1112 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723001 Title: no screensaver capability -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720975] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify()
I've ticketed this upstream here: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3224 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3224 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3224 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3224 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720975 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 686066] Re: system monitor applet should have appindicator support
I'm also sorely missing a system monitor applet for Unity. An indicator applet might be OK. As another approach, perhaps System Monitor could show a graph indicating CPU activity inside its icon in the Unity Launcher. (That's how it works on a Mac, by the way.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686066 Title: system monitor applet should have appindicator support -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 720975] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify()
Thanks for the bug report. Are you able to reproduce this crash? If so, could you possibly follow the instructions in the Shotwell FAQ (http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/Shotwell/FAQ) to generate a backtrace and log file and attach them to this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720975 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGFPE in LibRaw::identify() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573312] Re: Wrong resolution in GDM when using external monitor connected to laptop - Intel chipset
Louis, you said that this bug is very low on anyone's priority list but it affects me too and is a major nuisance. At home, I always boot up my laptop with the lid closed and an external monitor on. GDM fails to set the correct resolution, and the resolution is still wrong after I log in: I have to run xrandr to correct it. I believe that GDM (or the X server?) is failing to realize that the lid is closed and that the laptop display should be ignored (at least, that's the behavior I would like). Instead, GDM (or the X server) is choosing the highest resolution common to both the laptop display and the external monitor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573312 Title: Wrong resolution in GDM when using external monitor connected to laptop - Intel chipset -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717680] Re: Shotwell always crashes when changing metadata
Jan, thanks for the bug report. Could you follow the instructions in the Shotwell FAQ (http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/Shotwell/FAQ) to generate a stack trace and log file and attach them to this bug? That will help us track down what's wrong. Thanks! ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717680 Title: Shotwell always crashes when changing metadata -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665602] Re: Incorrect sorting of photos
Dmitry, Shotwell is known to not work with dates before 1969 - see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3040 . I think that's probably the cause of the sorting problems you're seeing. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3040 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3040 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665602 Title: Incorrect sorting of photos -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 717680] Re: Shotwell always crashes when changing metadata
Jan, ah, yes - I see the log file now. Thanks. 1) there's a known metadata writing crash which was fixed in the very latest release of libexiv2 - see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3104 . If possible, could you build and install libexiv2 0.21.1 and also gexiv2 0.3.0, and then see if the crash goes away? (If it's not obvious how to build these libraries let us know and we can help you.) 2) If step 1 doesn't help, we'll need to see a stack backtrace as well to let us debug further. The Shotwell FAQ explains how you can generate one. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3104 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3104 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717680 Title: Shotwell always crashes when changing metadata -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 716264] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set_variant()
gokhanakat, what did you do to make the crash happen? Does it happen every time you run Shotwell? Can you reproduce the crash at will? ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716264 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in dbusmenu_menuitem_property_set_variant() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709516] Re: import hangs on certain video files
Jan, this fix will be included in Shotwell 0.9, which we're planning to release some time in March. You'll be able to install Shotwell 0.9 from the Yorba PPA at that time. Glad you're excited to have this fix! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709516 Title: import hangs on certain video files -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714230] Re: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full
Matt, thanks for this latest information. Actually, I think what we need to be able to reproduce this bug is to see the *exact* dimensions of the Shotwell window in its maximized state on your machine. So could you possibly do the following? 1. Start Shotwell and maximize the window. 2. Check that the flickering bug still occurs. 3. Take a screenshot of the Shotwell window in its maximized position. (The screenshot doesn't actually need to be taken at the moment the flickering bug is happening.) 4. Attach the screenshot here. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714230 Title: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 715647] Re: image thumbnail not updated
I can confirm this behavior. To make the above steps a bit more precise: 1. Double-click a JPEG file on your desktop (or in any other Nautilus window). Eye of GNOME will appear and display the image. 2. In Eye of GNOME, click Edit Image. The Shotwell image viewer will appear. 3. Crop the image in Shotwell and save. 4. The thumbnail on the desktop will briefly change to show it's refreshing itself, but will then revert to showing the full image, not the cropped image. 5. Meanwhile, Eye of GNOME will display a message The image foobar.jpg has been modified by an external program. Would you like to reload it? Strangely, if I open the photo directly in the Shotwell image viewer and then crop and save, everything works fine. The problem occurs only when I open the Shotwell image viewer via Eye of GNOME. This is not, however, a Shotwell bug. To see this, modify the shotwell- viewer.desktop file (you can find it in /usr/share/applications) to point to GIMP rather than Shotwell. If you then repeat the above steps, you'll see that the exact same behavior occurs when cropping using GIMP rather than Shotwell. So this is actually a bug in Eye of GNOME, in the Nautilus thumbnailing system, or in the interaction between those components. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715647 Title: image thumbnail not updated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701737] Re: Shotwell SIGSEGV in LibRaw::sony_arw_load_raw()
Yesterday I asked Robert Ancell from Canonical to update libraw to 0.13 in natty and he went ahead and did that. (I'm not sure whether the Debian update you mentioned is related to that.) Because libraw is statically linked into Shotwell, Ubuntu will also need to rebuild Shotwell for Natty now that libraw has been updated. So I've asked them to rebuild Shotwell as well. Once that happens we should be able to close this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701737 Title: Shotwell SIGSEGV in LibRaw::sony_arw_load_raw() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 715089] Re: [Maverick] Can't select multiple photos and print
This is a reasonable request. I've filed a ticket upstream here: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3159 Glad you like Shotwell! :) ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3159 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3159 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3159 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715089 Title: [Maverick] Can't select multiple photos and print -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714230] Re: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full
Matt, thanks for the additional information. One more question: what is your display resolution in pixels? (You might be able to see it in System-Preferences-Monitors, or by running 'xrandr' on the command line.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714230 Title: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665602] Re: Incorrect sorting of photos
I can't reproduce this problem in the current Shotwell trunk with the test database posted in #7. Dmitri, can you update to Shotwell 0.8.1 (or even the current trunk) and confirm that you still see this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665602 Title: Incorrect sorting of photos -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714296] Re: RAF files shows uncorrect
This has been reported upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2246 for different cameras. It would help us if you could attach a RAF photo either to this ticket or the upstream ticket - that will help us make sure that when we fix this bug we'll correctly support your camera as well. The upstream bug tracking system (Trac) doesn't allow large attachments, so you might need to upload your photo to a file sharing service and attach its URL instead. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2246 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2246 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2246 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714296 Title: RAF files shows uncorrect -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701737] Re: Shotwell SIGSEGV in LibRaw::sony_arw_load_raw()
Timo, thanks for this latest ARW file. With this file, I can reproduce your crash when Shotwell is built with libraw 0.9 (the version currently in Ubuntu 11.04). When I build Shotwell with libraw 0.13 (the latest release), however, your photo imports without a problem. So I believe this bug has been fixed in libraw. We have an upstream ticket (http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2583) for updating the Shotwell build in the Yorba PPA to use the latest libraw. We will also ask Ubuntu to update their libraw version as well. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2583 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2583 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2583 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701737 Title: Shotwell SIGSEGV in LibRaw::sony_arw_load_raw() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705667] Re: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen
Phyrenze, I'm not sure why you wrote thanks - to be clear: 1) we still aren't able to open your latest screenshot. As Omer pointed out, it has an unusual name which might be the problem. 2) as I pointed out in #8, we still don't really understand what you're experiencing. Perhaps the screenshot will help if you can post one that we can download. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705667 Title: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714230] Re: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full
Matt, 1. does the flicker happen only while the progress bar is advancing, or even after the progress bar is complete? 2. If the flicker does stop once the progress bar is complete, are you then able to select images and import them, or must you click another entry in the sidebar as you described above? 3. Could you possibly upgrade to Shotwell 0.8.1 and see whether the problem occurs there too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714230 Title: Shotwell flickers during import when thumbnail area full -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711294] Re: Shotwell crashes a second after launch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 675068 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675068 OK, so this bug is definitely a duplicate of bug 675068. I'll mark it as such. Sorry to hear you've had trouble installing Shotwell 0.8. It sounds like you may have a permissions problem with /etc/sudoers. I don't understand what you mean by I'm not going to launch in protected mode. We don't have a .deb available for Shotwell 0.8, so if you want to upgrade you'll either need to install from the PPA or build from source as described on our Web site. In any case, the right place to ask questions about building/installing Shotwell 0.8 is on the Shotwell mailing list or an Ubuntu forum, not on this ticket. So please post any followup questions there - thanks. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 675068 Shotwell crashes if linked to files over ssh with ERROR:DirectoryMonitor.vala:510 * You can subscribe to bug 675068 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/675068/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711294 Title: Shotwell crashes a second after launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697436] Re: [Natty] Problem with the Crop function: nothing happens
I can't reproduce this with Natty Alpha 2 and the current Shotwell trunk. I built Shotwell in Natty Alpha 2 and the crop tool seems to work normally. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697436 Title: [Natty] Problem with the Crop function: nothing happens -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711294] Re: Shotwell crashes a second after launch
Eden7c, ok - you were confused by the command in the Shotwell FAQ. It looked like this: % SHOTWELL_LOG=1 gdb ./shotwell 21 | tee shotwell.gdb You weren't supposed to type the % character! That was merely an indication of a shell prompt. Some older UNIX shells used a '%' instead of a '$'. I've now edited the FAQ to use a $ instead of a % to avoid this confusion in the future. So could you run the command again without typing the % at the beginning? I think that should work better. :) Once you're done, please attach the resulting shotwell.gdb and shotwell.log here. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711294 Title: Shotwell crashes a second after launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 649340] Re: in Unity, top-level Shotwell menu does not change when user switches views
Great to hear about this progress! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649340 Title: in Unity, top-level Shotwell menu does not change when user switches views -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711294] Re: Shotwell crashes a second after launch
It's OK - we've all been there. :) Here's what's going on. The command line in the FAQ looked like this: $ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 gdb ./shotwell 21 | tee shotwell.gdb . means the current directory, so ./shotwell means the shotwell program in the current directory. Evidently when you ran that command you weren't in the directory where Shotwell is installed (probably /usr/bin), so gdb wasn't able to find shotwell. In our FAQ, there's really no reason to specify ./shotwell since most people running this command will have Shotwell in their PATH anyway. So I've just changed the command in the FAQ to look like this: $ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 gdb shotwell 21 | tee shotwell.gdb If you'd like to try that I suspect you'll get better results. Thanks for helping us debug the FAQ. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711294 Title: Shotwell crashes a second after launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711294] Re: Shotwell crashes a second after launch
OK, great - we finally have a stack trace (i.e. shotwell.gdb), which lets us see what's going on. This now looks like a duplicate of bug 675068, which occurred in Shotwell 0.7 whenever the Shotwell library contained files remotely accessed via ssh. That bug was fixed in Shotwell 0.8. So: 1. Are some of your library files on a network drive? 2. Whether they are or not, can you try upgrading to Shotwell 0.8 to see if the problem goes away? You can install Shotwell 0.8 from the Yorba PPA following the instructions on the Yorba web site at http://yorba.org/shotwell/install/#binaries . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711294 Title: Shotwell crashes a second after launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669263] Re: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color
Omar: We are not planning an 0.7.3 release at this time. (Our development efforts are currently focused on 0.9, which we plan to release in time for Ubuntu 11.04 this spring.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669263 Title: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669263] Re: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color
Omer: oops - I spelled your name wrong in my previous comment. Sorry for the typo! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669263 Title: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711294] Re: Shotwell crashes a second after launch
Thanks for the bug report. Could you generate a GDB backtrace and log file following the instructions in the Shotwell FAQ (http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/Shotwell/FAQ) and post them here? That will help us investigate the problem. Thanks! ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711294 Title: Shotwell crashes a second after launch -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709516] Re: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?!
I've looked through the log file and I don't really see any signs of trouble. It looks like Shotwell was importing photos from 8:14 until 8:48. Then there are 10 minutes of silence in the log file and after that, at 8:58, Shotwell reported that a camera was detected. Did Shotwell hang during this import and, if so, do you know when? Was it hung from 8:48-8:58 and then it woke up after that? Or did it hang after the cameras were detected at 8:58? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709516 Title: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711427] Re: Shotwell crashes after moving photos between albums
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 623029 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623029 This is a duplicate of bug 623029. The crash is a bug in the GNOME global menu plugin you're using. See bug 623029 for more details. You might have better luck using the new Ubuntu global menu. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 623029 Shotwell crashes when moving pictures from one event to another * You can subscribe to bug 623029 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/623029/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711427 Title: Shotwell crashes after moving photos between albums -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669263] Re: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color
The fix was in this commit http://trac.yorba.org/changeset/2370 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669263 Title: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709892] Re: shotwell crashes on startup, symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZTVN5Exiv25ErrorE
Hm - this looks like some sort of library versioning problem. What does this command print? $ dpkg -l 'libgexiv2*' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709892 Title: shotwell crashes on startup, symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZTVN5Exiv25ErrorE -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709892] Re: shotwell crashes on startup, symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZTVN5Exiv25ErrorE
It looks like you have libgexiv2 0.2.0 installed, but the library is missing a symbol for some reason. Odd. - Have you built Shotwell and/or gexiv2 yourself, or only installed binary packages? - Have you used the Yorba PPA, or have you gotten packages only from the Ubuntu repositories? - Could you post the output of these commands? $ ls -l /usr/lib/libgexiv2* $ strings /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.0 | grep ErrorE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709892 Title: shotwell crashes on startup, symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZTVN5Exiv25ErrorE -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709516] Re: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?!
Jan, the entries considered invalid errors are harmless - see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1872 . They should go away once you update to a newer version of the libexiv2 library. The hang you're experiencing is a bigger problem. Could you try importing again while generating a log file as described on this page? http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/ShotwellArchLogging Please post the log file here - that may give us a better idea of what's going on. Thanks! ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #1872 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1872 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709516 Title: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709516] Re: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?!
Actually I misspoke: the entries considered invalid errors won't go away merely as a result of updating libexiv2. They are harmless, though. We're working on making them go away in a future Shotwell release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709516 Title: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709516] Re: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?!
Jan, you asked if that was correct - that depends on what you did, exactly. This is incorrect: $ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 $ shotwell If you want a UNIX shell to pass a variable to a command, you need to do either of these: $ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell or $ export SHOTWELL_LOG=1 $ shotwell -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709516 Title: Shotwell import hangs always at the same point?! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 669263] Re: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color
OK - our engineers have looked at the patch and it looks OK. I'll emphasize that we haven't built or tested it, however - we do lots of testing on our official releases but if you guys want to cherry pick individual bug fixes then you should do some testing yourselves. I doubt this is a particularly high-risk change, but testing is still always a good idea when pushing to millions of users! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669263 Title: backgroundcolor left pane does not match GTK Theme color -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 662304] Re: Shotwell has no burn to CD/DVD feature
Rogério, Thanks for your suggestions. I've added your comments to the upstream ticket as well. By the way, for some information about how to back up your Shotwell library, see the Shotwell FAQ at http://trac.yorba.org/wiki/Shotwell/FAQ . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662304 Title: Shotwell has no burn to CD/DVD feature -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707934] Re: Duplicate warning when file being imported always in missing files list
I agree that Shotwell should do this. In fact, I thought we had already implemented this, but I was wrong. I've ticketed this upstream here: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3132 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3132 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3132 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3132 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707934 Title: Duplicate warning when file being imported always in missing files list -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 708375] Re: Shotwell doesn't remember Hide photos already imported tickbox
Thanks for the suggestion. There's already a ticket for this upstream: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3090 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3090 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3090 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3090 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708375 Title: Shotwell doesn't remember Hide photos already imported tickbox -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705667] Re: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen
Which model of Nokia phone is it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705667 Title: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631759] Re: Error message: Unable to unmount the camera at this time
Brett, I doubt that your bug is the same as this one, since this one only occurred with memory cards, not when attaching a camera. I still don't see what trouble you're having with Shotwell. When you attach a camera, Shotwell says that it needs to unmount the camera in order to access it; that's normal and expected. If you choose Unmount, can Shotwell read photos from the camera? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631759 Title: Error message: Unable to unmount the camera at this time -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705667] Re: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen
I'm not sure I completely understand. You have several different cellphones, and you're not able to import photos into Shotwell from any of them? Also, unfortunately I can't open the screenshot you attached to this ticket - when I click it, I see a message There’s no page with this address in Launchpad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705667 Title: problem with open fotos : no encuentra el archivo de origen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644125] Re: Date information not imported with jpg files of scanned negatives
Michael, Shotwell 0.8.1 will run on Lucid, but neither the Ubuntu repositories nor the Yorba PPA contain Shotwell 0.8.1 for Lucid - you need to build it yourself. See the instructions on the Yorba web site, and feel free to ask on the Shotwell mailing list if you're having trouble building. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644125 Title: Date information not imported with jpg files of scanned negatives -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
