Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu.

2013-11-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:13:21PM +0800, Ben Tinner wrote:
 On Mon Nov 4 12:41:29 UTC 2013, Daniel Holbach wrote:
 Are you planning to get the necessary packages into Ubuntu itself? That
 might help make maintenance a lot easier.
 
 The guys at MATE are currently attempting to upload the packages to Debian 
 but as of now there is little progress into it.
 
 The MATE repository have MATE packages for Ubuntu available, so I included 
 the MATE repo for the packages.
 
 Shall we pull all the MATE packages into the Ubuntu repo directly or we build 
 the sources ourselves?

It would be far superior to fix the problem with uploading to Debian
rather than working around it by uploading directly to Ubuntu or by
maintaining a separate repository.  Unless there is a *lot* of effort
available to deal with Ubuntu-local packaging, having the packages in
Debian as well generally yields better results.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu.

2013-11-07 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:13:21PM +0800, Ben Tinner wrote:
 On Mon Nov 4 12:41:29 UTC 2013, Daniel Holbach wrote:
 Are you planning to get the necessary packages into Ubuntu itself? That
 might help make maintenance a lot easier.

 The guys at MATE are currently attempting to upload the packages to Debian 
 but as of now there is little progress into it.

 The MATE repository have MATE packages for Ubuntu available, so I included 
 the MATE repo for the packages.

 Shall we pull all the MATE packages into the Ubuntu repo directly or we 
 build the sources ourselves?

 It would be far superior to fix the problem with uploading to Debian
 rather than working around it by uploading directly to Ubuntu or by
 maintaining a separate repository.  Unless there is a *lot* of effort
 available to deal with Ubuntu-local packaging, having the packages in
 Debian as well generally yields better results.

And there is in fact a team working on packaging MATE for Debian:
pkg-mate-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething
   Debian Developer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-06 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ben Tinner bentin...@yahoo.com.sg wrote:

 Hello

 I am planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu which will have the GNOME 2
 look and feel. For those of you who are subscribed to ubuntu-users, you
 would have heard about my plans to create this (Anyone interested in a
 GNOME 2 look and feel remix?).

 Officially called Ubuntu MATE Remix, this will integrate the MATE Desktop
 Environment to the power and stability of Ubuntu. In fact, I already had a
 working prototype based on Saucy Salamander. You can download the
 prototype at https://shared.com/unqjauvtrj

 Currently, there are a few issues with the prototype.

 1. I do not know how to implement a GUI bootmenu in the Live CD (like the
 one used in the Ubuntu Live CD).
 2. I do not know how to make the system to autostart the GUI, so the only
 way to start the GUI is to type 'startx' on the command line.


Have a look at /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/ which determines which
environment to load.
Apparently the default is still configured there (user-session=ubuntu ?),
and since those packages are not available, you get the CLI prompt.


 I will be generating another prototype based on Trusty Tahr soon.

 After testing out my prototype, can you give me a few suggestions to
 improve the distro? I hope that this will be officially recognised and
 supported by the Ubuntu community.


I am totally new to MATE; I notice that the MATE packages exist in a
separate repository. Do you know of any effort to get them to 'universe'? I
think that would help tremendously.

Simos
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-05 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Benjamin Kerensa bkere...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 It is unclear why Linux Mint disables all of their security updates although
 to some degree they have tried to justify their disabling of kernel updates
 by suggesting that such updates could make a system unstable and that normal
 users shouldn't get these kinds of updates.

Sounds like bad maintainers justifying being bad if you ask me.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-05 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:11:45AM -0600, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
 Sounds like bad maintainers justifying being bad if you ask me.

Please be respectful. The Ubuntu Code of Conduct applies on this list.

It's fine to call out their security policy. That appears to be based on
fact. But I don't think it's reasonable to speculate by attacking them,
especially in their absence and without having an understanding of their
rationale.

Please can we keep this thread constructive?

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-05 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Robie Basak robie.ba...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 It's fine to call out their security policy. That appears to be based on
 fact. But I don't think it's reasonable to speculate by attacking them,
 especially in their absence and without having an understanding of their
 rationale.

In no way did I personally attack anybody, I stated an opinion and an
opinion that will be iterated by anybody who cares about security.
And in no way could that ever be considered speculation because it is
not theoretical that the policy is bad, it is well known that any
policy that leaves a user in a state of bad security is bad.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-05 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,

Am Dienstag, den 05.11.2013, 07:32 +0200 schrieb Nik Th:

 I'm don't watch the conversation from the beginning , but I assume (in your 
 distro) you will keep the original repositories and official packages , 
 correct ? 
 I'm not a developer, thus I cannot help you with coding, but if you decide to 
 release this distro of yours, I would like to participate as a tester. 
 Drop a note in this list or my e-mail when you are ready. 
i am not the person wanting to build a new distro, but as ubuntu
developer i would be happy to give a hand with the few harder steps it
takes (creating seeds and metapackages, making regular image builds on
cdimage work etc) to create a proper derivative...

before this can happen the mate packages need to go into the ubuntu
archive proper though ... (or even into debian so we can just sync them
from there and they can benefit too) 

ciao
oli


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-05 Thread Daniel Hollocher


  Do you think that Linux Mint is a vulnerable system ? Really ?

 https://github.com/linuxmint/mintupdate/blob/master/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintUpdate/rules

 this is the list of packages it will never update, instead of just
 integrating changes properly with the packagaes in the ubuntu archive
 they instead suppress doing (security) updates at all for them.


 It looks like that is not quite the case.  Packages that are marked as 4
and 5 are not updated by default, whereas 1-3 are.  This is a setting which
can be changed:
http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=47t=111929

Still probably insecure, but I understand they are trying to balance
between security and regressions.
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-04 Thread Nik Th


02.11.2013, 20:00, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com:

 It might for exmaple allow security updates (which are explicitly hacked out 
 of Linux Mint for Xorg, the kernel, Firefox, the bootloader and various other 
 packages)
 so that you dont have to go online with a vulnerable system ;)

 ciao
 oli

 ,
 --

Do you think that Linux Mint is a vulnerable system ? Really ? 

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
Am Montag, den 04.11.2013, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nik Th:
 
 02.11.2013, 20:00, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com:
 
  It might for exmaple allow security updates (which are explicitly hacked 
  out of Linux Mint for Xorg, the kernel, Firefox, the bootloader and various 
  other packages)
  so that you dont have to go online with a vulnerable system ;)
 
  ciao
  oli
 
  ,
  --
 
 Do you think that Linux Mint is a vulnerable system ? Really ? 
https://github.com/linuxmint/mintupdate/blob/master/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintUpdate/rules

this is the list of packages it will never update, instead of just
integrating changes properly with the packagaes in the ubuntu archive
they instead suppress doing (security) updates at all for them.

i would say forcefully keeping a vulnerable kernel browser or xorg in
place instead of allowing the provided security updates to be installer
makes it a vulnerable system, yes

i personally wouldn't do online banking with it ;)

ciao
oli


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-04 Thread Daniel Holbach
Hello,

On 02.11.2013 16:52, Ben Tinner wrote:
 I am planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu which will have the GNOME
 2 look and feel. For those of you who are subscribed to ubuntu-users,
 you would have heard about my plans to create this (Anyone interested in
 a GNOME 2 look and feel remix?).
 
 Officially called Ubuntu MATE Remix, this will integrate the MATE
 Desktop Environment to the power and stability of Ubuntu. In fact, I
 already had a working prototype based on Saucy Salamander. You can
 download the prototype at https://shared.com/unqjauvtrj
 
 Currently, there are a few issues with the prototype.
 
 1. I do not know how to implement a GUI bootmenu in the Live CD (like
 the one used in the Ubuntu Live CD).
 2. I do not know how to make the system to autostart the GUI, so the
 only way to start the GUI is to type 'startx' on the command line.
 
 I will be generating another prototype based on Trusty Tahr soon.
 
 After testing out my prototype, can you give me a few suggestions to
 improve the distro? I hope that this will be officially recognised and
 supported by the Ubuntu community.

Are you planning to get the necessary packages into Ubuntu itself? That
might help make maintenance a lot easier.

People from the other Ubuntu flavours might be able to help out with
some of the issues you mention above.

Have a great day,
 Daniel

-- 
Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging
Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-04 Thread Nik Th


04.11.2013, 13:45, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com:
 Am Montag, den 04.11.2013, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nik Th:

  Do you think that Linux Mint is a vulnerable system ? Really ?

 https://github.com/linuxmint/mintupdate/blob/master/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintUpdate/rules

 this is the list of packages it will never update, instead of just
 integrating changes properly with the packagaes in the ubuntu archive
 they instead suppress doing (security) updates at all for them.

 i would say forcefully keeping a vulnerable kernel browser or xorg in
 place instead of allowing the provided security updates to be installer
 makes it a vulnerable system, yes

 i personally wouldn't do online banking with it ;)

 ciao
 oli

 ,
 --

Thank you for clarifying this. Do you know the reason ? Why they don't update 
those packages ? 

I'm don't watch the conversation from the beginning , but I assume (in your 
distro) you will keep the original repositories and official packages , correct 
? 
I'm not a developer, thus I cannot help you with coding, but if you decide to 
release this distro of yours, I would like to participate as a tester. 
Drop a note in this list or my e-mail when you are ready. 

Good Luck. 


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-04 Thread Benjamin Kerensa
It is unclear why Linux Mint disables all of their security updates
although to some degree they have tried to justify their disabling of
kernel updates by suggesting that such updates could make a system unstable
and that normal users shouldn't get these kinds of updates.

Anyways it is something that might be better researched on their forums
since people have asked a few times over the past couple years, and they
probably have a better idea than us.

I can say that it took them many months to get a fixed version of Firefox
packaged while Ubuntu and Debian had already had security fixes in their
package. This puts Linux Mint users at risk and is one of the key reasons I
never suggest Linux Mint to anyone as an alternative to Ubuntu.



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Nik Th nikt...@yandex.com wrote:



 04.11.2013, 13:45, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com:
  Am Montag, den 04.11.2013, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Nik Th:
 
   Do you think that Linux Mint is a vulnerable system ? Really ?
 
 
 https://github.com/linuxmint/mintupdate/blob/master/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintUpdate/rules
 
  this is the list of packages it will never update, instead of just
  integrating changes properly with the packagaes in the ubuntu archive
  they instead suppress doing (security) updates at all for them.
 
  i would say forcefully keeping a vulnerable kernel browser or xorg in
  place instead of allowing the provided security updates to be installer
  makes it a vulnerable system, yes
 
  i personally wouldn't do online banking with it ;)
 
  ciao
  oli
 
  ,
  --

 Thank you for clarifying this. Do you know the reason ? Why they don't
 update those packages ?

 I'm don't watch the conversation from the beginning , but I assume (in
 your distro) you will keep the original repositories and official packages
 , correct ?
 I'm not a developer, thus I cannot help you with coding, but if you decide
 to release this distro of yours, I would like to participate as a tester.
 Drop a note in this list or my e-mail when you are ready.

 Good Luck.


 --
 Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
 Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss




-- 
*Benjamin Kerensa*
*http://benjaminkerensa.com http://benjaminkerensa.com*
*I am what I am because of who we all are - Ubuntu*
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Planning to create a new distro of Ubuntu

2013-11-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 13:28:32 -0400
Daniel Hollocher danielholloc...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 
  Officially called Ubuntu MATE Remix, this will integrate the MATE Desktop
  Environment to the power and stability of Ubuntu. In fact, I already had a
  working prototype based on Saucy Salamander. You can download the
  prototype at https://shared.com/unqjauvtrj
 
 
 What's the difference between this and Linux Mint MATE?

It might for exmaple allow security updates (which are explicitly hacked out of 
Linux Mint for Xorg, the kernel, Firefox, the bootloader and various other 
packages)
so that you dont have to go online with a vulnerable system ;)

ciao
oli


pgpFMNtmDenlW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss