RE: [WSG] IE img border padding error
Hi Bert Thanks for the suggestions. I'm not quite a CSS expert, but I'm not sure that images, being replaced elements can officially have padding, since padding goes inside the element I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0208.htm So it is possible to style an image to have padding and a border. Just not sure why my version isn't working in IE Win. Any other thoughts welcome. Thanks Sarah :) -- XERT Communications email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +61 2 4782 3104 mobile: 0438 017 416 http://www.xert.com.au/ web development : digital imaging : dvd production ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] accessible image form buttons
Hmmm... I have tried to hide the border of an input field in Opera, but it flatly refused: input{border:0;} This is Opera 7.23 oh, that bug. Fixed in 7.50 or 7.60... For Opera 7.2 use: input {border: 0 solid;} -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] IE img border padding error
G'day I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0208.htm So it is possible to style an image to have padding and a border. I don't see image padding mentioned, at least not on that page. Just not sure why my version isn't working in IE Win. Could be that IE doesn't support it padding on images. See below. These issues may have been fixed in later versions of MSIE and Opera but why not try padding the container instead? Should work in almost anything *According to http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/css/properties/padding/padding.htm : MSIE4+: Padding properties do not apply to images NS4:Applying padding values to a replaced object (my test was an IMG element) really messes with document content flow Opera 3.5: Padding is not applied to replaced items (IMG, form field widgets, etc.) Regards -- Bert Doorn, Web Developer Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
OMG...I'm not worthy. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 12/17/2004 5:44 AM Leslie Riggs said the following: Now THIS is what makes designing with CSS fun!! I just love this. Leslie Riggs http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down! Russ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] IE img border padding error
Hi again I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0208.htm So it is possible to style an image to have padding and a border. I don't see image padding mentioned, at least not on that page. The CSS code on Russ' tutorial highlights the padding as per below: .floatright { float: right; width: 102px; margin: 0 0 10px 10px; background-color: #ddd; padding: 10px; /* This line uses the padding */ border: 1px solid #666; } Could be that IE doesn't support it padding on images. I have used Russ' technique here: http://www.xert.org/ and it works well in IE Win. Still a mystery to me why it won't work here: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/ Thanks Sarah -- XERT Communications email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +61 2 4782 3104 mobile: 0438 017 416 http://www.xert.com.au/ web development : digital imaging : dvd production ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Site review plz - Thank you.
The url: http://www.azapi.com/ Just a quick thank you to all that gave comments and suggestions! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 2004/12/15 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] IE img border padding error
G'day again. The CSS code on Russ' tutorial highlights the padding as per below: .floatright { ...snip... padding: 10px; /* This line uses the padding */ border: 1px solid #666; } As I've been saying, that's the container, not the image: div class=floatrightimg ... brCaption here/div ..not... divimg class=floatright .../div I have used Russ' technique here: http://www.xert.org/ and it works well in IE Win. Still a mystery to me why it won't work here: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/ Seems an overly complex and totally different setup to me (background images, lots of spans and classes, no img element with padding). Anyway, it's up to you what you do :-) Regards -- Bert Doorn, Web Developer Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Nav bar rounding error problem
Hi Folks, I'm creating a simple vertical nav bar using a styled list. Should be pretty easy as it's something I've done a hundred times. However this time I've run into problems with browser rounding errors. I've come up with another way of doing it, but it's not as elegant as the initial version. I've posted up an explanation with a couple of test cases and I'd be grateful if the CSS geniuses on the list could have a look and suggest a better way of achieving the desired results. http://www.message.uk.com/test/nav/ As always your help in much appreciated. p.s. I have to come clean and admit I've also cross posted this to css-discuss. Hope nobody minds. Andy Budd http://www.message.uk.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Nav bar rounding error problem
On 17 Dec 2004, at 8:45 pm, Andy Budd wrote: Hi Folks, I'm creating a simple vertical nav bar using a styled list. Should be pretty easy as it's something I've done a hundred times. However this time I've run into problems with browser rounding errors. http://www.message.uk.com/test/nav/ #firstAttempt ul#mainNav li a { /* rest of styles */ line-height:normal /* - this fixes it in Mozilla */ } Use padding (in px) to create the height of the line box. http://dev.l-c-n.com/Gecko/moz_spacing.php for some background. Philippe ---/--- Philippe Wittenbergh now live : http://emps.l-c-n.com/ code | design | web projects : http://www.l-c-n.com/ IE5 Mac bugs and oddities : http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Netscape 4 - let it die
Talking about NN4, it seems that the updated OptusNet Helpdesk (for those O/S - Optus is .au's 2nd largest Telco) has started (not fully - still some layout tables) to move to Web Standards and not bothered with NN4 prettiness (the header fails). But the site seems to be doing something a little-funky to get the nav accessible. Seems without the 'nav_ns4.css' in the header the links are not useable. There gonna have fun with that front page. http://www.optusnet.com.au/help/dsl/homepage - Original Message - From: Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:19 PM Subject: [WSG] Netscape 4 - let it die Why do you let 8-year-old browser to stop you from making good pages? I agree that webpages should be accessible to all - they should work without CSS and JavaScript. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors. Christie Mason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:18 +1100, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down! Russ Thanks Russ, but as for myself, I believe I like the unpretentious http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://lyuanqing.freeprohost.com/verdure/css.css by his young man: Name: Lim Yuan Qing ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors. Christie Mason I am absoultely sure you did not see real wow factors with IE - for the very simple reason - lack of PNG opacity support in IE. I guess many did not use correct url: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenocean.css URL must end with zenocean.css. Regards, Rimantas ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Netscape 4 - let it die
Kornel Lesinski wrote: Why do you let 8-year-old browser to stop you from making good pages? I agree that webpages should be accessible to all - they should work without CSS and JavaScript. I don't :) I just use the @import; rule to prevent NN4 from loading the stylesheets, and a bit of server-side trickery to display a message for NN4 users, urging them to upgrade (or when thats not possible... just a simple div (with display: none; specified in the style-sheets) with the upgrade message inside it) HTH -David R ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Site review plz - Thank you.
Very nice! Nice colour scheme also. And Azapi sounds like a great product also. One feature I particularly like is the ability to easily resize the screen font size. As it nears dawn (about 12:30am now) and your eyesight starts fading that is a really nice touch. I tried it with FireFox 1.0 under WinXP HE SP2 and it works really well. I'm off to start writing a major e-commerce site and yours is great inspiration! Peter Tilbrook ColdGen Internet Solutions Manager, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group 4/73 Tharwa Road Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620 AUSTRALIA WWW 1: http://www.coldgen.com/ WWW 2: http://www.actcfug.com/ Telephone: +61-2-6284-2727 Mobile: +61-0439-401-823 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of my external emails are scanned for viruses using the latest available Norton AV signatures. Also I do NOT maintain an Address book or Contact list to minimise the risk of infecting recipients of my messages for viruses. I also prefer plain text emails for speed and efficiency. Powered by Lookout: Lookout is lightning-fast search for your email, files, and desktop works with Microsoft Outlook. http://www.lookoutsoft.com/Lookout/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacobus van Niekerk Sent: Friday, 17 December 2004 9:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Site review plz - Thank you. The url: http://www.azapi.com/ Just a quick thank you to all that gave comments and suggestions! Kind Regards Jacobus van Niekerk -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 2004/12/15 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] IE img border padding error
Just have time for a quick glance, but I think it looks nice, it validates, and it doesn't have unintelligible markup so my screen reader doesn't struggle with it. Just to make sure, you're not going to keep the Heading Two, Heading Three, etc. right? Because in my screen reader it says Heading Two Heading Two and Heading Two Heading Three, respectively. Otherwise I think it's good! Charlie Sarah Peeke (XERT) has created a disturbance in the Force. I felt its presence on 12/17/2004 2:41 AM. Its substance was as follows: Hi all Was wondering if someone has some time to check out this *in progress* page I'm working on: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/ I have validated the XHTML and CSS and it appears to be OK on Firefox, Safari, NS 7.0, Opera 7.5, IE Mac 5.2.3, but NOT in IE Win 6. The problem is that the 5px padding around the images does not show in IE Win 6.0. Not sure how it looks in IE Win 5.5. Any ideas etc greatly appreciated. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column Layout
On 17 Dec 2004, at 03:29, Hugh Todd wrote: Anyone come up with, or implemented, a 3-column layout of this sort in which the left and right columns also stretch as a percentage of the page width? I refer you to Zoe Gillenwater (http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?page=1cid=AFC58). I am surprised that she hasn't made comment. -- Paul Connolley SQL/Systems Programmer Egocentric - http://egocentric.co.uk ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
The diver doesn't show up in my version of IE6. I'm thinking that's by design. Rimantas Liubertas has created a disturbance in the Force. I felt its presence on 12/17/2004 8:44 AM. Its substance was as follows: On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors. Christie Mason I am absoultely sure you did not see real wow factors with IE - for the very simple reason - lack of PNG opacity support in IE. I guess many did not use correct url: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenocean.css URL must end with zenocean.css. Regards, Rimantas ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
Yes, I did use the correct URL, you may want to use something like Tiny URL for future links. I may have missed some opacity in IE but I didn't really feel like I missed anything, the page was still very wow. Unfortunately, I'm not fond of wow. Christie Mason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rimantas Liubertas Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors. Christie Mason I am absoultely sure you did not see real wow factors with IE - for the very simple reason - lack of PNG opacity support in IE. I guess many did not use correct url: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css URL must end with zenocean.css. Regards, Rimantas ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column Layout
what if you want one of the columns to have a border around it, say the right column. How can this be done? Bruce Gilbert webmaster DPS-Original Message- From: Mani Sheriar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Dec 16, 2004 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column LayoutClean Clean DocumentEmail MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Hi Everyone! This is my first post to this group after reading it for a while. I must say, Im kinda scared to post to you guys! However, I really need your help. I think I may have found the Holy Grail that 3-column css liquid layout that allows for different colors and/or backgrounds for the body, the header, the footer, and the three columns NO MATTER WHICH COLUMN IS LONGEST. What I need help with is this: I have checked this out on Mozilla, FireFox, Netscape, and IE all on the pc. Can anyone who is interested please check it out on some other browsers/platforms? Also, I read the usual css blogs as much as I have time for, but Im not sure if someone else (or even several people) have already beaten me to the punch here. If not, I would take the time to write something up about it. Heres the link: http://www.ManiSheriar.com/holygrail By the way, I know that the code for the content comes after the code for the sidebars, but for accessibility concerns I could just put a skip to content link at the top, no? Anyway thanks for any feedback, and please be gentle with me. ;~) Mani (like Bonnie) Mani Sheriar Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
I'm getting weird things in Safari 1.2.3 OS X.3.5. Safari either shows no flashlight turning on *or* the bg to the diver is a tall column, almost the reverse of the ocean gradient, and the flashlight works. FF 1.0 Mac works great. Anyone else?? Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist mlinc.com russ - maxdesign wrote: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down! Russ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] [OT] Link wrapping [was: Another amazing css zen garden entry]
Christie Mason wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors. I am absoultely sure you did not see real wow factors with IE - for the very simple reason - lack of PNG opacity support in IE. I guess many did not use correct url: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css URL must end with zenocean.css. Yes, I did use the correct URL, you may want to use something like Tiny URL for future links. I may have missed some opacity in IE but I didn't really feel like I missed anything, the page was still very wow. Unfortunately, I'm not fond of wow. Tinyurl really isn't necessary if all you want to do is prevent line wrap breaking it in pieces. Just prepend a quote char to the link thus: http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenocean.css -- I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.John 14:6 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column Layout
what if you want one of the columns to have a border around it, say the right column. How can this be done? If you want one of the columns to have a border, then you just apply the border property to the column and your 200x1 pixel gif can have that border on it as well. Should work fine. One of the main reasons that I struggled to create this layout is so that you could have different colors for the background, header, footer, and all three columns (none of the colors are shining through from underlying elements). This can be extended to different backgrounds as well ... which is the REAL reason that I worked on this design. If you wanted some sort of fancy background for the side columns (or any element) then you would just apply that background to the column and the wrapper div. IE 5.2 OS X (Mac): extra padding added to the width of the left and right columns Screenshot: http://www.motive.co.nz/temp/041217-hoygrail.gif (could be a known CSS bug related to IE implementation of box model-padding and border added to width) See: http://tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html Call for help: Does anyone have any ideas about this problem in IE 5.2 OS X (screenshot: http://www.motive.co.nz/temp/041217-hoygrail.gif). I have already implemented the box model hack, so I'm not sure what the issue could be. Anyone come up with, or implemented, a 3-column layout of this sort in which the left and right columns also stretch as a percentage of the page width? I haven't tried it yet, but one theory is to make the background repeater very long (horizontally), and set it to repeat-y, but set its x-axis start position as a percentage. I haven't tried it yet, but one theory is to make the background repeater very long (horizontally), and set it to repeat-y, but set its x-axis start position as a percentage. I actually started working on an all-liquid layout at first. I ended up going to a single-column liquid layout just because this would work better for a project I'm about to embark on. What you suggest is exactly how I planned to try to implement the backgrounds (I didn't get that far yet, though). However, I might try to follow up on the all-liquid layout just to see if it can be done. If I get to it and get it to work, I'll post it here. Quick Note: Dejan - Wow ... THANK YOU for your help. I'm sure those screen shots will be very helpful and I really appreciate your time. Mani Sheriar Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com 925|914.0741 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
Hi, Creating a product catalog/blog for client. It will serve as a site for posting used construction equipment. In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: CK __ Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do. ---Bruce Lee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:41:12 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes, I did use the correct URL, you may want to use something like Tiny URL for future links. URL123 (http://url123.com) is really handy for posting long URLs in email. It even allows you to save links you've shared, edit them, etc. It's a great free service. Hope that helps. Francesco ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: I'd probably use a definition list: dl dtMy Product/dt ddProduct Number: 123456/dd dd pProduct Description:/p pThis is my product... Ain't it perty?/p /dd ddMSRP: $1 Bazillion (will trade for 4x4 in good condition)/dd /dl How about a table? They're not always evil... table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody trthProduct Number/thtd12334/td/tr trthProduct Description/thtdpretty/td/tr trthProduct Cost/thtdbazillion/td/tr /tbody /table ..and Lynx WILL render that table! :D -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
It's not beautiful if you zoom your text. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
Hi, Both are viable solutions, would the dl be more scalable for floating an image with caption beside it. With the table you mentioned Lynx support, does Lynx choke on dl? C On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 09:09 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: I'd probably use a definition list: dl dtMy Product/dt ddProduct Number: 123456/dd dd pProduct Description:/p pThis is my product... Ain't it perty?/p /dd ddMSRP: $1 Bazillion (will trade for 4x4 in good condition)/dd /dl How about a table? They're not always evil... table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody trthProduct Number/thtd12334/td/tr trthProduct Description/thtdpretty/td/tr trthProduct Cost/thtdbazillion/td/tr /tbody /table ..and Lynx WILL render that table! :D -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** CK __ Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do. ---Bruce Lee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
Everything has a weakness -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vaska.WSG Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry It's not beautiful if you zoom your text. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
Todd Baker wrote: hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground Thats amazing. those bubbles own :) seriously, awesome job. But, its not balanced at all. Until i got to the bottom i was like ok, what's the big deal?. Perhaps thats a feat in and of itself... http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down! ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
That so rocks. Too bad it won't get listed on there, because it causes IE problems. On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:01:30 -0500, Brian Cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Todd Baker wrote: hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground Thats amazing. those bubbles own :) seriously, awesome job. But, its not balanced at all. Until i got to the bottom i was like ok, what's the big deal?. Perhaps thats a feat in and of itself... http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc ean.css Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down! ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Mathias Bynens aka MaThIbUs http://mathibus.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column Layout
I was able to achieve the border on my right column with adding a border to by bgimage, thanks Mani. One problem I am having though. I have a header image that is exactly 800px, so I want my whole page to be no more than 800px wide. I have set my #wrapper to 800px. In IE my right column overlaps the header to the right a little bit. It doesn't do this in moz, ff, netscape. Is there way to compensate for this IE irregularity? (no padding or margin on wrapper) Bruce Gilbert webmaster DPS -Original Message- From: Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Dec 17, 2004 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid Three-Column Layout what if you want one of the columns to have a border around it, say the right column. How can this be done? If you want one of the columns to have a border, then you just apply the border property to the column and your 200x1 pixel gif can have that border on it as well. Should work fine. One of the main reasons that I struggled to create this layout is so that you could have different colors for the background, header, footer, and all three columns (none of the colors are shining through from underlying elements). This can be extended to different backgrounds as well ... which is the REAL reason that I worked on this design. If you wanted some sort of fancy background for the side columns (or any element) then you would just apply that background to the column and the wrapper div. IE 5.2 OS X (Mac): extra padding added to the width of the left and right columns Screenshot: http://www.motive.co.nz/temp/041217-hoygrail.gif (could be a known CSS bug related to IE implementation of box model-padding and border added to width) See: http://tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html Call for help: Does anyone have any ideas about this problem in IE 5.2 OS X (screenshot: http://www.motive.co.nz/temp/041217-hoygrail.gif). I have already implemented the box model hack, so I'm not sure what the issue could be. Anyone come up with, or implemented, a 3-column layout of this sort in which the left and right columns also stretch as a percentage of the page width? I haven't tried it yet, but one theory is to make the background repeater very long (horizontally), and set it to repeat-y, but set its x-axis start position as a percentage. I haven't tried it yet, but one theory is to make the background repeater very long (horizontally), and set it to repeat-y, but set its x-axis start position as a percentage. I actually started working on an all-liquid layout at first. I ended up going to a single-column liquid layout just because this would work better for a project I'm about to embark on. What you suggest is exactly how I planned to try to implement the backgrounds (I didn't get that far yet, though). However, I might try to follow up on the all-liquid layout just to see if it can be done. If I get to it and get it to work, I'll post it here. Quick Note: Dejan - Wow ... THANK YOU for your help. I'm sure those screen shots will be very helpful and I really appreciate your time. Mani Sheriar Sheriar Designs | www.ManiSheriar.com 925|914.0741 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
Yes both are viable. I would use the dl when I was expecting to have a few per page type layout that would be more like a brochure layout. I would use the table when what I wanted was - you guessed it - a table layout. My own personal guideline for table VS anything else is simply asking myself the question Is this a table?. If the answer is Yes then I use a table. Otherwise I use an appropriate tag. In the case of a set of products (or similar, Contacts, Events, News, in fact mostly any single entity that you may have a collection of with a name) I regularly use dl because you can say all of those have a This generic term (e.g. Product Name) equates to this specific instance (e.g. CSS Stylesheet Editor) relationship. That is - this equals that. (Which is basically what a definition list is semantically). But I would use it differently to the original suggestion... dl id=cssed1 dtPhoto:/dt ddimg src=csseditor.gif/dd dtName:/dl ddCSS Stylesheet Editor/dd dtDescription:/dt ddGreat editor for CSS stylesheets/dd dtPrice:/dl ddFor you... $10/dd /dl That markup has many possibilities (including being able to style each product individually if you want) I have also used the exact same markup to provide different views of the information depending on the context of the surrounding container tag (e.g. a main page body versus a side bar). Regards Gary On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:19:22 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Both are viable solutions, would the dl be more scalable for floating an image with caption beside it. With the table you mentioned Lynx support, does Lynx choke on dl? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column scope. On a table as small as this it is not really essential, but once the table grows (or if served from a database where it could be any size) good column and row headings with scope attributes are essential. table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody tr th scope=rowsProduct Number/th td12334/td /tr tr th scope=rowsProduct Description/th tdpretty/td /tr tr th scope=rowsProduct Cost/th tdbazillion/td /tr /tbody /table Graham Cook -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski Sent: Saturday, 18 December 2004 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: I'd probably use a definition list: dl dtMy Product/dt ddProduct Number: 123456/dd dd pProduct Description:/p pThis is my product... Ain't it perty?/p /dd ddMSRP: $1 Bazillion (will trade for 4x4 in good condition)/dd /dl How about a table? They're not always evil... table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody trthProduct Number/thtd12334/td/tr trthProduct Description/thtdpretty/td/tr trthProduct Cost/thtdbazillion/td/tr /tbody /table ..and Lynx WILL render that table! :D -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
Hi, Any browser idiosyncrasy with dl? I'm hoping none exist with tables. CK PS Thanks for the many viable solutions On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 01:49 PM, Graham wrote: And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column scope. On a table as small as this it is not really essential, but once the table grows (or if served from a database where it could be any size) good column and row headings with scope attributes are essential. table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody tr th scope=rowsProduct Number/th td12334/td /tr tr th scope=rowsProduct Description/th tdpretty/td /tr tr th scope=rowsProduct Cost/th tdbazillion/td /tr /tbody /table Graham Cook -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornel Lesinski Sent: Saturday, 18 December 2004 4:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Kennon wrote: In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic mark-up. Product Name: Product Number: Product Description: Product Cost: I'd probably use a definition list: dl dtMy Product/dt ddProduct Number: 123456/dd dd pProduct Description:/p pThis is my product... Ain't it perty?/p /dd ddMSRP: $1 Bazillion (will trade for 4x4 in good condition)/dd /dl How about a table? They're not always evil... table summary=pretty bazillion product captionMy Product/caption tbody trthProduct Number/thtd12334/td/tr trthProduct Description/thtdpretty/td/tr trthProduct Cost/thtdbazillion/td/tr /tbody /table ..and Lynx WILL render that table! :D -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** CK __ Knowing is not enough, you must apply; willing is not enough, you must do. ---Bruce Lee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Semantic Mark-Up for Product Catalog
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column scope. What is the default scope? -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] IE img border padding error
Hi Charlie RE: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/ Just have time for a quick glance, but I think it looks nice, it validates, and it doesn't have unintelligible markup so my screen reader doesn't struggle with it. Just to make sure, you're not going to keep the Heading Two, Heading Three, etc. right? Because in my screen reader it says Heading Two Heading Two and Heading Two Heading Three, respectively. Otherwise I think it's good! You're right the headings (and paragraph text) are just temporary. Thanks for the feedback though, as I have not done much testing with screen readers. Sarah ;-) -- XERT Communications email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: +61 2 4782 3104 mobile: 0438 017 416 http://www.xert.com.au/ web development : digital imaging : dvd production ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool (even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that... Comments like I'm not worthy are somewhat surprising; but hey, to each their own :) Andrew. --- http://leftjustified.net/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool (even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that... I have to agree with your post, Andrew. This is quite interesting toy for playing, but the overall look'n'feel really doesn't seem wow to me... -- Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
Some of us are pretty impressed and even mystified at the guy's technical creativity at utilising standards-based techniques to achieve the effects of the diver and the light and the bubbles and the crab. It is that sense of seeing art at the cutting-edge of science that makes us go wow. Sure, we've all seem much more impressive deep diver ocean scenes, but using only HTML and CSS? Could the people who think it is so non-wow, please explain to us in a few simple words, how it is done? Then I am going to do something similar by afternoon-tea time John At 11:57 AM 18/12/2004, JohnyB wrote: I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool (even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that... I have to agree with your post, Andrew. This is quite interesting toy for playing, but the overall look'n'feel really doesn't seem wow to me... ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:58:11 +1100, J4Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: When I first saw it, I thought ooh this is a nice color scheme and use of animated gifs and that was about it. It is quite creative. Francesco Sanfilippo, Developer / Designer --- Blackcoil Productions - http://blackcoil.com URL123 Link Service - http://url123.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] accessible image form buttons
On 17 Dec 2004, at 10:01 am, Kornel Lesinski wrote: divinput//div div {background: darkcolor url(darkimage);} input {opacity: 0.5; -moz-opacity: 1; background: lightcolor url(lightimage);} As far as I know currently it is quite safe, but it will start to cause trouble when Opera implements opacity and/or Gecko drops -moz- variant. Gecko browsers support the opacity property correctly, without the -moz prefix, since Gecko1.6 (meaning: Firefox1.0 supports opacity). What is wrong with solution 3: input type=image src=Searchbutton.gif alt=Search title=search / adding a title attribute for good measure and increased accessibility, providing your image doesn't use tiny text, and has good contrast between text and background ? All my Mac browsers display the 'title' as a 'tooltip'. Philippe ---/--- Philippe Wittenbergh now live : http://emps.l-c-n.com/ code | design | web projects : http://www.l-c-n.com/ IE5 Mac bugs and oddities : http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] accessible image form buttons
-Original Message- From: Philippe Wittenbergh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 18 December 2004 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] accessible image form buttons What is wrong with solution 3: input type=image src=Searchbutton.gif alt=Search title=search / adding a title attribute for good measure and increased accessibility, providing your image doesn't use tiny text, and has good contrast between text and background ? I prefer giving my users the ability to increase font, if possible. Not everybody with a visual disability has got a screenreader to read out the alt text. Pure text can't go wrong. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
It is that sense of seeing art at the cutting-edge of science that makes us go wow. Good point John, I can't argue with that :) The backgrounds are great, the css is cutting edge. That doesn't make it a great design though. Could the people who think it is so non-wow, please explain to us in a few simple words, how it is done? Then I am going to do something similar by afternoon-tea time I haven't looked at the css, but if I was trying to achieve this it would be setup something like: diver : top layer (z-index), fixed positioning, 24-bit png. gradient: second layer, attached to top, 24-bit png. light: bottom layer, fixed positioning, 24-bit png. Everything else would be animated gifs on :hover states, two reasons the effect doesn't work in IE. The ocen floor is either a photo or render, treasure chest added after the fact. Crab is animated gif, drawn over the sand but cut back to binary transparency. That said, the conception of such a technique is usually more work than the application, and this technique is pretty damn slick. What I should have said is that while the 'diver trick' is cool, I don't rate it amongst my favourite zen entries. Andrew. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **