Re: [XFree86] Xserver crash, i810

2006-10-30 Thread jayjwa

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Mark Vojkovich wrote:

-Were the GLX or DRI modules loaded in this case?  I still suspect
- a DRI or GLX bug, mostly because I haven't seen this with NVIDIA drivers
- which don't use the XFree86 dri or glx modules.



Yes, as this machine (the i810 one) didn't have problems previously. Nothing 
about the glx module in this one, unlike the S3 crash. The problem could have 
been around for some time, as it's rare that I leave an X session up for more 
than a day (I usually exit back out to command line when I'm done), and that's 
when this seems to happen: when X is left running over a day or so.



I'll see what happens without the suspected modules. Wine complains with glx 
missing.



-  *** glibc detected *** X: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08d30de8 ***
- 
-  waiting for X server to shut down === Backtrace: =
-  /lib/libc.so.6[0xb7df4cf3]
-  /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0xb7df81b0]
-  X(FreeGC+0x61)[0x80cf8b1]
-  X(FreeScratchGC+0x3f)[0x80cf90f]
-  [0xb79a9e85]
-  [0xb79ae41c]
-  [0xb7b97229]
-  [0xb7b98341]
-  X(FreeClientResources+0x6b)[0x80d406b]
-  X(FreeAllResources+0x4a)[0x80d413a]
-  X(main+0x439)[0x80d2899]
-  /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd8)[0xb7da2f38]
-  X[0x806f101]


Thanks


___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Xserver crash, i810

2006-10-29 Thread jayjwa
Here's the same type crash as was happening with the S3 VirgeDX chipset, only 
this time on i810. No mention of glx module, but it was loaded. Two different 
machines, same XFree86, 4.6.0. Both crashes only happen if X is left running 
for over a day or so, then shut down. Once the server closes, the console is 
never restored. This crash didn't produce a log, only the follow when I got 
hold of the console back using svgalib's restoretextmode util.



*** glibc detected *** X: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08d30de8 ***

waiting for X server to shut down === Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0xb7df4cf3]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0xb7df81b0]
X(FreeGC+0x61)[0x80cf8b1]
X(FreeScratchGC+0x3f)[0x80cf90f]
[0xb79a9e85]
[0xb79ae41c]
[0xb7b97229]
[0xb7b98341]
X(FreeClientResources+0x6b)[0x80d406b]
X(FreeAllResources+0x4a)[0x80d413a]
X(main+0x439)[0x80d2899]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd8)[0xb7da2f38]
X[0x806f101]
=== Memory map: 
-000a rwxs  00:07 98305  /SYSV0002 (deleted)
000a-000c rwxs 000a 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
000c-000f rwxs 000c 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
000f-0010 r-xs 000f 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
08048000-081d3000 r-xp  03:01 2193636/usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
081d3000-08206000 rwxp 0018a000 03:01 2193636/usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
08206000-097e5000 rwxp 08206000 00:00 0  [heap]
af50-af521000 rwxp af50 00:00 0
af521000-af60 ---p af521000 00:00 0
af689000-af734000 rwxp af689000 00:00 0
af734000-af76d000 rwxp af76d000 00:00 0
af7a4000-af7b4000 rwxs 000a 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
af7b4000-b77b4000 rwxs f000 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
b77b4000-b77f rwxp b77b4000 00:00 0
b77f-b787 rwxs ffa8 03:01 556569 /dev/mem
b787-b791 rwxs  00:07 98305  /SYSV0002 (deleted)
b791-b7d8d000 rwxp b791 00:00 0
b7d8d000-b7ecb000 r-xp  03:01 654805 /lib/libc-2.5.so
b7ecb000-b7ecd000 r-xp 0013e000 03:01 654805 /lib/libc-2.5.so
b7ecd000-b7ece000 rwxp 0014 03:01 654805 /lib/libc-2.5.so
b7ece000-b7ed1000 rwxp b7ece000 00:00 0
b7ed1000-b7edb000 r-xp  03:01 1669573/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7edb000-b7edc000 rwxp 9000 03:01 1669573/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7edc000-b7ede000 r-xp  03:01 654813 /lib/libdl-2.5.so
b7ede000-b7edf000 r-xp 1000 03:01 654813 /lib/libdl-2.5.so
b7edf000-b7ee rwxp 2000 03:01 654813 /lib/libdl-2.5.so
b7ee-b7f05000 r-xp  03:01 654811 /lib/libm-2.5.so
b7f05000-b7f06000 r-xp 00024000 03:01 654811 /lib/libm-2.5.so
b7f06000-b7f07000 rwxp 00025000 03:01 654811 /lib/libm-2.5.so
b7f07000-b7f19000 r-xp  03:01 1670084/usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3
b7f19000-b7f1a000 rwxp 00012000 03:01 1670084/usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3
b7f1a000-b7f28000 rwxp b7f1a000 00:00 0
b7f28000-b7f2c000 r-xp  03:01 8544105/lib/libsafe.so.2.0.16
b7f2c000-b7f2d000 rwxp 3000 03:01 8544105/lib/libsafe.so.2.0.16
b7f2d000-b7f2f000 rwxp b7f2d000 00:00 0
b7f2f000-b7f3 r-xp b7f2f000 00:00 0  [vdso]
b7f3-b7f4c000 r-xp  03:01 654854 /lib/ld-2.5.so
b7f4c000-b7f4d000 r-xp 0001b000 03:01 654854 /lib/ld-2.5.so
b7f4d000-b7f4e000 rwxp 0001c000 03:01 654854 /lib/ld-2.5.so
bfbf5000-bfc0a000 rwxp bfbf5000 00:00 0  [stack]


Any idea what's cause both machines to crash, but only when X is up for quite 
some time before shutting down? The S3 crash happened the same way, but 
mentions GL/glx module.


This happened priviously on the i810 as well, but I had no output to send in 
as I couldn't re-claim the console and had to reboot.


___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Xserver crash part #2: glx module

2006-10-25 Thread jayjwa
(If you missed it, I posted a few issues back about a strange crash, now I 
have more info as to the cause and how to get out of it again.)



Yup, it is definately the glx module. Remove it and everything is OK. It won't 
crash right away. I have to have X up for about 20 minutes and then close it 
down before it gets stuck in graphic mode. This only happens on the S3 VirgeDx 
machine, not my other i810.





   *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
   *** be the reason for the server aborting.

Caught signal 11.
Stack trace:
 0: 0x808db0d: 0x808daf0 xf86ShowStackTrace + 0x1d
Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
 1: 0x808dbd3: 0x808db70 xf86SigHandler + 0x63
Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
 2: 0xb7fd2420: 0xb7fd2420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0x0
Module 
 3: 0xb7a6041c: 0xb7a603f0 __MESA_destroyBuffer + 0x2c
Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:xf86glx.o
Section .text
 4: 0xb7c49229: 0xb7c491f0 __glXDestroyDrawablePrivate + 0x39
Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a:glxutil.o
Section .text
 5: 0xb7c4a341: 0xb7c4a2e0 DrawableGone + 0x61
Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a:glxscreens.o
Section .text
 6: 0x80d406b: 0x80d4000 FreeClientResources + 0x6b
Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
 7: 0x80d413a: 0x80d40f0 FreeAllResources + 0x4a
Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
 8: 0x80d2899: 0x80d2460 main + 0x439
Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86

Fatal server error:
Server aborting




I figured out you can use restoretextmode from svgalib. Just save a 
known-good textmode: restoretextmode -w /etc/vga/textmode.save. Then put this 
in a small script you can blind-type (because the screen will be useless after 
the crash), such as /bin/tt:


#!/bin/sh
##
## Reset textmode after an Xserver crash.
##

restoretextmode -r /etc/vga/textmode.save




When if/when the crash happens, (under root) just hit tt and you're out.


___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] XServer Crash

2006-10-18 Thread jayjwa
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Mark Vojkovich wrote:

-Does omitting the glx module help?  Perhaps the trace (which
- implies a segfault in __MESA_destroyBuffer unless I'm reading that
- incorrectly) is misleading and it would crash somewhere else if
- that module wasn't loaded.  A new trace without the glx module
- might be enlightening.

If the problem would occur again. Since it happened with regularity that first 
day, I thought this was going to be an on-going thing. Now it won't crash in a 
similar fashion even with all the usual modules enabled. I guess I should be 
happy. ;)


___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] XServer Crash

2006-10-16 Thread jayjwa
This just started this morning, but I don't use this machine as much so 
prehaps this may be due to a kernel upgrade?


Exiting X results in the screen locking, black, with just the pointer where I 
left it. The command line is still usable, but the only way to get the display 
back is a full reboot. I caught the logfile this time, looks like X starts to 
crash and then doesn't restore the text mode:



XFree86 Version 4.6.0
Release Date: 10 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 i686 [ELF] 
Current Operating System: Linux atr2 2.6.18 #1 Wed Sep 27 04:13:25 EDT 2006 i686

Build Date: 6 May 2006
Changelog Date: 10 May 2006
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Command line: X :0 -nolisten inet6
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (EE) error, (WW) warning,
(II) informational, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Mon Oct 16 01:03:12 2006
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config.
(II) Executable is /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86.
(II) Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86.
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.3
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.10
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.5
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.4
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.5
(II) Loader running on linux
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled.
(==) ServerLayout Complex Layout
(==) |--Screen Screen 1 (0) (0, 0)
(**) |  |--Device S3 ViRGE
(**) |  |--Monitor CrystalScan (0)
(**) |--Input Device Mouse1
(**) |--Input Device Keyboard1
(**) FontPath set to 
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/,/usr/share/fonts
(**) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(**) ModulePath set to 
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules,/lib/modules/current/kernel/drivers/char/drm
(**) Option Xinerama
(**) Option AllowDeactivateGrabs true
(**) Option AllowClosedownGrabs true
(**) Xinerama: enabled.
(II) Checking for unused ServerFlags options:
(II) LoadModule: pcidata
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.10
(II) LoadModule: bitmap
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project
compiled for 4.6.0, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.5
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(--) using VT number 7

(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8000983c, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,1237 card , rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 8086,7000 card , rev 01 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:07:1: chip 8086,7010 card , rev 00 class 01,01,80 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:07:2: chip 8086,7020 card , rev 01 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:0b:0: chip 105a,4d33 card , rev 01 class 01,04,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:0f:0: chip 1317,0985 card 1317,0574 rev 11 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 5333,8a01 card 10b4,1717 rev 01 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:13:0: chip 8086,1040 card 8086,1000 rev 00 class 07,80,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
(II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,0), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(II) Bus 0 I/O range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range:
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
(II) PCI-to-ISA bridge:
(II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:7:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set)
(--) PCI:*(0:17:0) S3 Inc. ViRGE/DX or /GX rev 1, Mem @ 0xf800/26
(WW) Open ACPI failed (/proc/acpi/event) (No such file or directory)
(WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device)
(II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
[0] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B]
[1] -1  0   0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B]
(II) OS-reported resource ranges:
[0] -1  0   0xffe0 - 0x (0x20) MX[B](B)
[1] -1  0   0x0010 - 0x3fff (0x3ff0) MX[B]E(B)
[2] -1  0   0x000f - 0x000f (0x1) MX[B]
[3] -1  0   0x000c - 0x000e (0x3) MX[B]
[4] -1  0   0x - 0x0009 (0xa) MX[B]
[5] -1  0   

Re: [XFree86] XServer Crash

2006-10-16 Thread jayjwa
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Mark Vojkovich wrote:

-It looks like a problem related to OpenGL.  My guess is this
- happened when cleaning up resources for an OpenGL app (like the
- screen saver) during shutdown.  Does killing the screensaver while
- the server is running produce the same problem?

When this happened last night, I had X running for hours, probably about 10. 
When I exitted is when the crash happened. After that I was able to reproduce 
it by just starting X and then right away exiting out. There was never a 
screen saver running (other than the default X11 one that will come on after a 
bit), such as xscreensaver or xlock, and I exitted all apps before terminating 
the window manager, which was at the time Blackbox. When I reproduced it last 
night I used also Mwm, and Twm, both with users and root user. 

-To my knowledge the S3 driver doesn't support accelerated
- 3D graphics.  Perhaps it doesn't happen if you don't load the
- dri module?

I cut the DRI module and it still produced the same results. Now today, I 
can't reproduce this at all (but I didn't let it run a long time, such as the 
10 hours yesterday). 



-  Caught signal 11.
-  Stack trace:
-0: 0x808db0d: 0x808daf0 xf86ShowStackTrace + 0x1d
- Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
-1: 0x808dbd3: 0x808db70 xf86SigHandler + 0x63
- Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
-2: 0xb7ee4420: 0xb7ee4420 __kernel_sigreturn + 0x0
- Module 
-3: 0xb79a541c: 0xb79a53f0 __MESA_destroyBuffer + 0x2c
- Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:xf86glx.o
- Section .text
-4: 0xb7b8e229: 0xb7b8e1f0 __glXDestroyDrawablePrivate + 0x39
- Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a:glxutil.o
- Section .text
-5: 0xb7b8f341: 0xb7b8f2e0 DrawableGone + 0x61
- Module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a:glxscreens.o
- Section .text
-6: 0x80d406b: 0x80d4000 FreeClientResources + 0x6b
- Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
-7: 0x80d413a: 0x80d40f0 FreeAllResources + 0x4a
- Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
-8: 0x80d2899: 0x80d2460 main + 0x439
- Module /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86
- 
-  Fatal server error:
-  Server aborting


What was running? Only some terminals, and I think Firefox, the first time. 
After this, during the tests to reproduce this, only the window manager.

___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Problems with startx in FC4

2006-10-15 Thread jayjwa

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Aleks Salinas wrote:

- I have FC4 and for an error, i deleted all files from /tmp. Since that
- moment i can't join in X Windows. I only can use startx with admin log. I
- know that there're files from every user about X Windows in /tmp, and I lost
- it. I need regenerate this files but don't know how...

login root (or su root, whichever) and ...

rm -rf /tmp  (make sure there's nothing you want to keep there)
mkdir /tmp
chmod 1777 /tmp
mkdir /tmp/.X11-unix
chmod 1777 /tmp/.X11-unix
mkdir /tmp/.ICE-unix
chmod 755 /tmp/.ICE-unix
chown -R root.root /tmp

___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] linux - no gui

2005-10-23 Thread jayjwa

On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, sowmya menon wrote:

-   today i tried installing fedora 4 . when i installed

It's not which linux distro you install, stick with the most up to date one 
you like. Old versions of software can have serious security bugs in them that 
could let someone else take control of your machine remotely.


- the previous versions it showed error Unable to probe
- video settings while installation. but fedora 4 didnt
- show any errors. it probed the video card -sis
- 300/305.


- but after installation still the Gui didnt come up. i
- am sending the log file and config file.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

That config file is very long and differicult to follow, I think it's trying 
to give an example of every possible parameter. IMO, you'd do better to write 
a simple one of your own from these and the manpages examples.


-  Parse error on line 242
-  Config file /etc/X11/XF86Config 
-  Device is not a valid keyword in this section


Bad config file. The configuration file format is detailed in the file 
XF86Config.5x (as XFree86 distributes it), on my system there is no 5x man 
section, so I move it to XF86Config.5.


man 5 XF86Config
or maybe
man 5x XF86Config
if you have a 5x section

Sis card specifics are described here:

man 4 sis

-  (EE) problem parsing config file
-  (EE) Error from xf86HandleConfig()
-  
-  Fatal server error: no screens found

Bad config file. The one that comes with many distros is a little off. They 
make it generic to fit all sorts of things, but in reality yours is only one 
card. Just note the format of it, particularly what sections are required, 
then start your own new one, following the format for a guide, but using the 
right parameters for your own system.


My device section:

Section Device
Identifier  Intel i810
Driver  i810
#VideoRam   431000
VideoRam231000
Option  DRI false
Option  XVideo true
Option  NoAccel false
EndSection


In /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers

is file sis_drv.o, which if you have a Sis card might be the one you need (I 
don't know this card myself, but this seems like a logical guess), so a start 
point for you Device section might be like this:


The drivers are the file names, without the _drv.o part at the end. For a 
different card, select one of the other drivers you see there.


Section Device
Identifier  Sis Card
Driver  sis
# Options go here, but sometimes aren't really needed
EndSection

For the Options section, which you might not need if the above is enough, look 
in 'man 4 sis', about line 58 or so down the screen.


When you do your screen section later, you take the Sis Card Identifier, and 
plug it in:


Section Screen
Identifier  Screen 1
Device  Sis Card
...
...

and so on...


It might take awhile to get a good config; make some changes to
/etc/X11/XF86Config, try to run X. If it's not working yet, read the log and 
see if it says anything to help you. Make some more changes, save it, try 
again.



Here's a finished example of one with all it's
sections from my first machine:

## --
## X11R6 Configuration
##
## Configuration file for X Window 
## using S3_Virge card driver
## (Works for both XFree86 and X.Org with minor 
## adjustments)

##
## --

Section Module
SubSection  extmod
EndSubSection
# Things in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts
Loadtype1
Loadfreetype
Loadspeedo
Loadxtt
# Ext. in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions
Loaddbe
Loaddri
Loadrecord
Loadglx
LoadGLcore
Loadxtrap
EndSection

# Some configs, especially RedHat, use the xfs here, but
# you can just use paths to fonts like this
Section Files
RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/
FontPath/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/
ModulePath  /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
ModulePath  /lib/modules/2.4.31/kernel/drivers/char/drm
EndSection

Section ServerFlags
Option  Xinerama
Option  AllowDeactivateGrabstrue
	Option 		AllowClosedownGrabs 	true 
EndSection


# Change this depending on which X11 distro is in use
Section 

Re: [XFree86] linux - no gui

2005-10-23 Thread jayjwa

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, gustavo halperin wrote:

- I send you again the file, the name is: XF86Config-4.vesa, just change the
- name to 'xorg.conf' and use it instead of your X configuration file. I use
- in this file the 'vesa' driver if it not work change the 'vesa' driver by
- the 'vga' driver.

That might not work, as it didn't for mine. On both my machines they required 
the card-specific driver. From what I can see from his components output, it 
does look like the Sis driver that I assumed in the example I wrote. Bad news 
is it almost looks like AGP (with the agpgart module) is needed? Is that 
possible on this card? It is on my I810, I don't know the Sis card. In fact, 
his machine is setup almost identical parts to my second one, right down to 
the Winmodem (came with WinXP, which I cheerfully removed 1st thing), only I 
have I810 instead of Sis.


/etc/X11/XF86Config   -- File works for both XFree86 or Xorg, can't lose

- Or last if you want easy life just install Ubuntu in your system, Ubuntu is
- a Debian linux system very user friendly I think the best today for the
- people that start with (Debian) Linux. After it you can continue update your
- system like is done in Debian.

Sooner or later you'll have to learn to write config files anyway; just look 
at the examples, look at what's on your system, work with what you have, and 
have patience.


One linux is as good as another, I guess. (Except for Debian/Ubuntu... besides 
having a funny name, it splits all it's packages into 70 different pieces when 
they'd normally be just one.)













J/K ;)


--
   / / __  __  __  __  __ __  __ mail me for my *
  / /__   / / /  \/ / / /_/ / \ \/ /  *  email address.
 /_/ /_/ /_/\__/ /_/  /_/\_\ ::[ATr2 RG 2005]::

Microsoft WinXP Pro/Home, Internet Explorer, MS Money, Office
HALL OF SHAME HONOREES:
http://www.threatcode.com/admin_rights.htm
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] XServer not loading with 2.6.13.1

2005-10-04 Thread jayjwa

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Umang Saini wrote:

- I am working with 2.4.20-1 kernel - Red Hat 7.3 . I recently migrated to
- 2.6.13-1, but encountered the following problem with XServer crashing at
- start-up.
- 
- The entire log file is attached. The final lines of the log are
- 
- 

- (II) I810(0): Monitor name: COMPAQ S710
- (--) I810(0): Chipset: i815
- (--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0x4400
- (--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0x4030
- (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such device)
- (EE) I810(0): AGP GART support is not available.  Make sure your kernel has
- agpgart support or that the agpgart kernel module is loaded.

Likely it's this   ^

When I first got my I810 machine, it took me awhile to figure out this was 
needed.


If your kernel doesn't have this support, you need to rebuild it, either 
including the support or build the module. Your kernel config should have 
this set. This is for my 2.4.x series kernel, but I think it's the same on 
2.6.x as well, as I had a 2.6.x on my I810 machine (briefly- XFree86 and 
the 2.6.x series don't play nice, IMHO. The kernel kept complaining that 
X wasn't supposed to access hardware directly. Maybe that's changed 
now...).


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp] grep -i agp /boot/config
CONFIG_AGP=m
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
CONFIG_AGP_I810=y
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD_K8 is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ATI is not set

I'm assuming I810 because of the log file above, but if your card really 
is different or if you have other computers/cards like this, there seems 
to be other AGP for other cards shown above.


Config'ed as a module gives this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp] locate agpgart

/lib/modules/2.4.31/kernel/drivers/char/agp/agpgart.o.gz
/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/drivers/char/agp/agpgart_be.c
/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/drivers/char/agp/agpgart_fe.c
/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/include/linux/agpgart.h


Rebuild the kernel if needed, or if you already have agpgart module or you 
built it in, you can skip kernel rebuilding.


Before you use X11 on that machine,

modprobe agpgart

[ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] ls -laF /dev/agpgart

crw-rw  1 root root 10, 175 2001-03-25 16:04 /dev/agpgart


[ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] lsmod | grep agp

agpgart26468   1


man mknod if you need to make the /dev/ entry

Part of my I810 machine's config looks like this (example):

Section Device
Identifier  Intel i810
Driver  i810
VideoRam231000
Option  DRI false
Option  XVideo true
Option  NoAccel false
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Screen 1
Device  Intel i810
Monitor MAG Innovision
   DefaultDepth 24
Subsection Display
Depth   8
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   15
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   16
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   24
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
EndSection



Hope that helps someone, there's usually a agp/I810 question or two on 
each list.



--
   / / __  __  __  __  __ __  __ svatre 4 tct/fzvzr
  / /__   / / /  \/ / / /_/ / \ \/ / naq pbagnpg vasb.
 /_/ /_/ /_/\__/ /_/  /_/\_\ ::[ATr2 RG 2005]::
Because my network won't be brought to its knees
by a 13-year old and a bot or a .zip file in the mail.
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] CAN-2005-2495: Current XFree86 and Recent CVE Advisory

2005-09-28 Thread jayjwa

http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2495

CAN-2005-2495:

This issue seems to effect both Xfree86 and X.Org versions of X. Many 
linux distro's have now begun to patch. Debian's advisory is really

unclear, as they seem to imply that only versions *before* XFree86 4.30
are affected. Checking out some of the links and advisories from the
other distro's, I find this Slackware one, which implies current X.Org
is affected:

Tue Sep 13 02:15:06 PDT 2005
x/x11-6.8.2-i486-3.tgz:  Patched an integer overflow in the X server pixmap
  memory allocation that could potentially allow any X user to execute
  arbitrary code with root privileges.
  For more information, see:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2495
  (* Security fix *)
x/x11-devel-6.8.2-i486-3.tgz:  Recompiled.
x/x11-docs-6.8.2-noarch-3.tgz:  Rebuilt.

(*snip*)


At http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2495 --


Name  CAN-2005-2495 (under review)

Description: 
Multiple integer overflows in XFree86 before 4.3.0
   
allow user-complicit attackers to execute arbitrary 
code via a crafted pixmap image. 
References* GENTOO:GLSA-200509-07


* URL:http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200509-07.xml 
* MANDRAKE:MDKSA-2005:164 
* URL:http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:164 
* REDHAT:RHSA-2005:501 
* URL:http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-501.html 
* TRUSTIX:2005-0049 
* URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=112690609622266w=2



So all of us using XFree86's binaries for linux at version 4.5.0 should
be OK, right? Well...

Mandriva Security Advisories

Package name XFree86
DateSeptember 13th, 2005
Advisory ID MDKSA-2005:164 
Affected versions 10.0, 10.1, CS2.1, CS3.0, 10.2

Synopsis Updated XFree86/x.org packages fix vulnerability


Problem Description

A vulnerability was discovered in the pixmap allocation handling of the X 
server that can lead to local privilege escalation. By allocating a huge 
pixmap, a local user could trigger an integer overflow that resulted in a 
memory allocation that was too small for the requested pixmap, leading to 
a buffer overflow which could then be exploited to execute arbitrary code 
with full root privileges.


The updated packages have been patched to address these issues.

Updated Packages


Mandrakelinux 10.0

a22ae2b3b2cc019d7769a29fb8d15104  10.0/RPMS/libxfree86-4.3-32.5.100mdk.i586.rpm
d13d37d18a49addab3b0a2d0531499da  
10.0/RPMS/libxfree86-devel-4.3-32.5.100mdk.i586.rpm
09b8bbc447d39afb1cd67ca808c3c409  
10.0/RPMS/libxfree86-static-devel-4.3-32.5.100mdk.i586.rpm
739c0d36b7de1927718087e6b58107a3  
10.0/RPMS/X11R6-contrib-4.3-32.5.100mdk.i586.rpm
8fbce53ac64d76dd1f3c01c1697a37f7  
10.0/RPMS/XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.3-32.5.100mdk.i586.rpm
7

(*snip*)

So are XFree86's version 4.5.0 binaries off their web/ftp servers affected
or not? It would appear that before 4.3.0 of XFree86 only is, but then
why would Slackware Linux and Mandrake be going so far as to replace
current X.Org stuff?

To put it another way, why are these linux distro's issuing
advisories for their current X.Org stuff when it seems only super old
XFree86 versions are affected? 4.3.0 is 2 whole versions behind 4.5.0.

But then, on http://www.x.org/ :

This advisory affects all known versions and releases of the X Window 
System whether from X.Org or other vendors. Therefore users are strongly 
recommended to upgrade.



Only one problem, there doesn't seem to BE a security upgrade for XFree86.



Where does this leave users of current XFree86? As the issue and its fix 
seem to deal with Xserver source code, that would like mean at least 
downloading a full source of X11 and re-making the Xserver target (if it 
was implemented this way, eg, is able to just build one part instead of 
having to do a full rebuild, such as make xserver instead of make all) 
I'm not looking forward to patching and rebuilding a complete X11; one of 
my machine has room, the other doesn't, which will mean NFS/SMBFS build 
over the network on a PII (glibc 2.3.5 took 17 hours to compile like this, 
to give an idea of what it's like).


In summary, can users expect fixed binary releases, or prehaps they 
already are patched (no info about this on the XFree86 website)? If it IS 
just the Xserver itself, (that is, the XFree86/X binary) I can probably 
rob a patched one from some distro's package. What are other users doing 
about this?


___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] No Screens Found.

2005-02-28 Thread jayjwa
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Jithin Girish wrote:
- I am using Xfree86 4.0.2, on a MIPS based board running Montavista 
Linux 2.0. I was able to compile and install TinyX on my system. Now when 
i try to invoke the Graphics System ,with the command 
/usr/X11R6/bin/Xfbdev i am getting the following error: - -

root@(none):/xc# /usr/X11R6/bin/Xfbdev  - [1] 3587 - root@(none):/xc# 
Error opening /dev/fb0 - : No such file or directory - - Fatal server 
error: - no screens found.
- - I request you to kindly look into this 
issue and suggest me a solution.

Looks like you're trying to run a framebuffer-using Xserver with no 
framebuffer. Try a recent version of Xfree with the standard Xfree86 
xserver. Pick the driver for whichever graphics card you have. 
Probably 'lspci' will give you some ideas about what's inside, if you 
aren't sure.

What happened to your hostname?!?
--
M$'s Windowz Genuine Advantage: Wine/Linux 
detected!! Your system will now shutdown:
http://www.linux.org/news/2005/02/19/0004.html
Boycott M$/Windows: Don't feed the Trolls.
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] I810 No video BIOS for chosen depth

2005-01-23 Thread jayjwa
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Bob Pelletier wrote:
+ Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:51:08 -0800 (PST)
+ From: Bob Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ Reply-To: xfree86@xfree86.org
+ To: xfree86@xfree86.org
+ Subject: Re: [XFree86] I810 No video BIOS for chosen depth

+ Hi jayjwa. Thanks for the update. I am not sure what I should change.
The fbset -xfree86 gave me back: + open /dev/fb0: no such 
device.

That means you're not using a framebuffer. That's not directly related to 
getting your video card to work with X11 though. It was just something I 
used to help me figure out some values, since I was using the frame buffer 
on that machine.

Did you get the letter I sent awhile back? It was to your email and not 
the list, since this list is a bit slow arriving here (I only see about 1 
or 2 a month). That email had more info in it and it may have been enough. 
If it wasn't and you're still having trouble, it would me (and others 
here) to have a bit more info on your machine. I think the heart of your 
trouble is your card needing a few kernel modules inserted for it to be 
able to be configured properly for X11. This was certainly the case with 
mine, and you seem to be using a similar card, if not the same one.

Some info which might help could be recorded and posted; if you still need
help-
Cut this out and chmod 755 it, run it after rebooting the
machine (so dmesg will show startup kernel messages).
#!/bin/sh
## If sh is really tcsh/csh
## this will look awful (tcsh
## actually says -e instead of
## interpeting it).
echo -e Machine info for `uname -n`  `date -R` \n\n  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e dmesg:  /tmp/xfinfo.log
dmesg  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nlspci -v:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
lspci -v  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nuname -a:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
uname -a  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nLoaded kmods:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
lsmod  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nAvailable kmods:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
tree /lib/modules/`uname -r`  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nCurrent XF86Config in /etc/X11:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
cat /etc/X11/XF86Config  /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo -e \n\nAvailable X11 mods, drivers-dri:   /tmp/xfinfo.log
ls /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers  /tmp/xfinfo.log
ls /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri  /tmp/xfinfo.log
gzip -9 -f /tmp/xfinfo.log
echo Done.
and send in xfinfo.log.gz out of /tmp
If you don't have tree you can use ls -R instead. I'm assuming your 
echo will give a newline with echo \n as well.

--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Screen Resolution (Problem Fixed)

2005-01-23 Thread jayjwa
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Bob Pelletier wrote:
+ Hi All. Great news. Got a work around. Lowered the color settings to 256 
and both machines are working. Thanks all. + Bob

+ Bukie Mabayoje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ Bob, 
+ I need this section from your XFreeConfig 
+ Section Device 
+  Identifier  Videocard0 
+  Driver  tdfx 
+  VendorName  Videocard vendor 
+  BoardName   Voodoo3 (generic) 
+  VideoRam16384 
+ EndSection 
+ I expect yours to say i810 or something similar. 
+ The driver shipped with XFree86 Version 4.3.0 is the old driver. And it is known to have a few problem. I think there is a newer driver. I need to read  some code before I can confirm it. Basically, we are going to use the new XFree86 with the latest driver. 
+ We'll get your system up and running 
+ -bukie

Ok, so you did get it working, good. I wasn't sure because I didn't hear 
from you. I think you should be able to do better with that card- better 
res. and more colors.

There are some notes about this driver in 
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/doc/README.i810:

This driver currently only works for Linux/ix86 and recent versions 
of FreeBSD.  It requires the agpgart kernel support, which is included 
in Linux kernels 2.3.42 and higher, and FreeBSD 4.1 and higher.

With mine, once it had the proper modules loaded, it looked really great.

--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] I810 No video BIOS for chosen depth

2005-01-05 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Bob Pelletier wrote:
+ Hi All. I am on my 4th install of RH9.0. Before I get to the first LOGON 
screen I get a graphical error:
+ I810(0) No video BIOS modes for chosen depth.
+ Screens found, but none have a useable configuration.
+ Fatal server error: no screens found
+ I have a DELL M992 monitor and the install detects it and fills in the 
horizontal/video sync rates (could they be wrong).
+ Any ideas on how to get by this. Happy holidays and thanks all.
+ Bob
Hmmm...sounds strangly familiar to the trouble I just had with this 
driver. I wrote in about it but got no answers. I ended up (finally) 
getting it going with alot of effort. I'm not such an expert on it, but I 
can tell you what I did on my machine and maybe that'll help out.

First, the main thing for me was I needed to load two modules into the 
kernel even before X11 started up, namely i830.o and agpgart.o (Note i830 
now, and not i810, that comes later in the XFR86Config file.) I think 
there's a document on the i810 and even a man page. See if you have a 
page, man i810 . Finished, the config looks like this:

## --
## XFree86 Configuration
##
## Configuration file for X Window XFree86 4.4.0
## using i810 card driver
## --
Section Module
SubSection  extmod
EndSubSection
Loadtype1
Loadfreetype
Loadspeedo
Loadglx
LoadGLcore
EndSection
Section Files
RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/
ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
ModulePath /lib/modules/2.4.28/kernel/drivers/char/drm
EndSection
Section ServerFlags
Option Xinerama 
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Keyboard1
Driver  Keyboard
EndSection
Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse1
Driver  mouse
Option ProtocolPS/2
Option Device  /dev/mouse
Option Emulate3Buttons  on
Option Emulate3Timeout50
EndSection
Section Monitor
Identifier  MAG Innovision
HorizSync   30.0-70.0
VertRefresh 50-160
# Generated by using fbset -xfree86
Mode 640x480
# D: 25.176 MHz, H: 31.469 kHz, V: 59.489 Hz
DotClock 25.177
HTimings 640 656 752 800
VTimings 480 488 490 529
Flags-HSync -VSync
EndMode
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier 	Intel i810
Driver 	i810
VideoRam 	431000
Option	DRI true
Option	XVideo true
Option	NoAccel false 
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Screen 1
Device  Intel i810
Monitor MAG Innovision
   DefaultDepth 24
Subsection Display
Depth   8
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   15
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   16
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   24
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
EndSection
Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Insanely Complex Layout
Screen  Screen 1
InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer
InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

Before I modprobe'd the extra modules (both of them) and added the Video 
Ram Option to the device section, I got the same error. No matter what I 
did it couldn't make use of the screens. It seemed to load, but was just 
black. For your monitor, maybe you could do  fbset -xfree86 to get the 
parameters. It says in the docs that you usually don't need to do that, 
but it's not hurt on my config. The number 431000 was from the kernel's 
log output after inserting the agpgart.o module. Without those two 
modules, the kernel kinda seemed like it was in the dark as to what to do 
with this chipset.

HTH,
jayjwa
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Font problem with XFree 4.3-32

2005-01-05 Thread jayjwa
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Lionel PLAIS wrote:
+ Hello, I'm a newbie and I have update XFree86 on my Mandrake 10.0
+ and I have a problem: whenever I want to run X an error message is 
+ print 
+ 
+ Fatal server error:
+ could not open default font 'fixed'
+ 
+ I don't understand, I have install all XFree86's packages.
+ Do you know what's the error?
+ Thank

Could be this:
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in /usr/local/share/fonts.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/local/share/fonts).
(WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts.
Entry deleted from font path.
(Run 'mkfontdir' on /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts).
(**) FontPath set to /usr/share/fonts
Check the manual pages about mkfontdir, mkfontscale, and fc-cache. 
Go see if there's actually fonts in those directories:

ls /usr/local/share/fonts
ls /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts
If there's no actual fonts in /usr/local/share/fonts then take it out of 
the config. You should have fonts in the subdirectories of 
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts though. Here's an example of my cyrillic 
directory:

ls /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic
crox1cbo.pcf.gz  crox2to.pcf.gz   crox5hbo.pcf.gz   koi10x20.pcf.gz
crox1cb.pcf.gz   crox2t.pcf.gzcrox5hb.pcf.gzkoi12x24b.pcf.gz
crox1co.pcf.gz   crox3cbo.pcf.gz  crox5ho.pcf.gzkoi12x24.pcf.gz
crox1c.pcf.gzcrox3cb.pcf.gz   crox5h.pcf.gz koi5x8.pcf.gz
and on and on...
The utils mkfontdir, mkfontscale, and fc-cache handle making the files 
that X needs to use the fonts. You should see files in with the fonts like 
this example from the above directory:

encodings.dir
fonts.alias
fonts.cache-1
fonts.dir
fonts.scale
You probably either have an empty directory, or haven't ran the utilities 
to process the font directories.

You might want to stick a piece of shell coding like this in your system 
boot scripts (/etc/rc.d/rc.M on mine) to update the font caches every so 
often:

# Update the X font indexes:
if [ -x /usr/X11R6/bin/fc-cache ]; then
  echo Updating X font indexes with FC-CACHE ...
  /usr/X11R6/bin/fc-cache
fi
If you're new to linux and X11 both, you'll save yourself some trouble by 
reading the man pages for XFree86 and its config file. Many times I see 
that the default config that's included in with people's distributions of 
linux just doesn't work.


--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Intel i810; what's wrong here?

2004-12-27 Thread jayjwa
Hello xlist;
For the life of me, I can't see what is wrong with this setup. I've 
recently got a new system. XF86 is fine on my S3 Virge, but every time I 
try on the new system which is using the i810 driver, all I get are black 
screens. No error messages, no crashes; it seems like everything is fine. 
yet there's no picture at all. I turned -logverbose to 10 and ran a 
session. The config  the log are both here (unless some mail filter 
strips them). Since the system is new, I'm taking the values for the 
chipset and moniter straight out of the monitor's manual, and even 
-configure seems to agree with my choices for drivers. To experiment, I've 
tried the vga, fbdev and vesa drivers with no luck either and same result.
In the docs of the XF86 archive, there's a blurb on using the agpgart.o 
module (this is a Pentium 4 Linux system, gcc/glibc based, everything 
recent and up to date), but this didn't seem to add anything to help.

I recompiled the modules (2.4.28 kern.), and checked all the simple things 
like using the wrong config, starting with a bad xinitrc, etc. The only 
time I've had results different than the above where when trying the vga 
driver, and using a really poor res. with depth 8. The charaters where so 
large that 50% of 1 xterm took up the full screen (around mode 620x480 or 
less). Other than that, just a black screen for everything I've tried, 
from commenting out sections/options to trying different rates, drivers 
and modes, to moving the depth + or -.

## --
## XFree86 Configuration
##
## Configuration file for X Window XFree86 4.4.0
## using i810 card driver. ( Linux reports the card
## as VGA Compat. Intel 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G]/GE
## chipset. MAG Innovision monitor.
## --
Section Module
SubSection  extmod
EndSubSection
Loadtype1
Loadfreetype
Loadspeedo
Loadglx
LoadGLcore
EndSection
Section Files
RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/
ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
ModulePath /lib/modules/2.4.28/kernel/drivers/char/drm
EndSection
Section ServerFlags
Option Xinerama 
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Keyboard1
Driver  Keyboard
EndSection
Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse1
Driver  mouse
Option ProtocolPS/2
Option Device  /dev/mouse
Option Emulate3Buttons  on
Option Emulate3Timeout50
EndSection
Section Monitor
Identifier  MAG Innovision
HorizSync   30.0-70.0
VertRefresh 50-160
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier Intel i810
Driver i810
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier  Screen 1
Device  Intel i810
Monitor MAG Innovision
   DefaultDepth 24
Subsection Display
Depth   8
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   16
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   24
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   32
Modes 1024x768 800x600 720x400 640x480
EndSubsection
EndSection
Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Insanely Complex Layout
Screen  Screen 1
InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer
InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

I'd hate to think this nice shiney new linux box can't run XF86!
If anyone has an idea, I'm at jayjwa -at- atr2.ath.cx (address in case 
this mails from the list under the list's From: address instead of mine). 
The list is kind of slow if you get it in digest form. Thanks.

jayjwa
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

XFree86.0.log.gz
Description: XFree86.0.log.gz


[XFree86] Next Upgrade?

2004-11-19 Thread jayjwa
When can we expect the next upgrade to XFree86? Currently, 4.4.0 seems to 
be the last binary package put out. However, there have been some recent 
security issues, namely with libXpm.so and a few others. Normally, in 
this situation I'd compile my own, using the latest available sources 
(even if they were devel/unstable, as its better than chancing a security 
breach). Only problem is, I don't have the room on my one and only hard 
disk to do a full build from source of XFree86; that's megabytes beyond 
what I have available.

The system is a linux x86 glibc (current) based system, and not a stock 
distribution any more. It was began as a Slackware install, but I made the 
decision to stand with XFree86 when they moved to X.org's build. There's 
also a some other major differences, but everything's current and 
up-to-date.

I'd like to continue to use XFree86, but not having a current, 
non-vulnerable binary release is tough. Or have the binary builds for 
4.4.0 been fixed as per the recent issues with libXpm? I looked thru the 
website for Xfree86, and in the security section, but this seems to 
indicate that it's compile-your-own from a snapshot or keep the old, 
vulnerable version...

Can anyone clear this up for me? Possibly I'm missing a notice, or some 
Changelog which shows how this issue was addressed for people in my 
circumstance? Any ideas?


--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] neomagic slackware 8.0

2004-11-14 Thread jayjwa
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Karol Tarasiuk wrote:
+ Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:16:58 +0100
+ From: Karol Tarasiuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ Subject: [XFree86] neomagic  slackware 8.0
+ Hello! + My name is Karol and I'm from Poland. I have problems with 
running Xfree86 on my computer. There is one error: no screens found. I 
have laptop with active matrix, and NeoMagic graphic card. I don't know 
what to do. Please help me. I don't know how to configure Xfree86. Thanks.

First, I'd update your linux  X11. Slackware is past ver. 10 now: lots of 
important updates. XFree86 is stable ver. 4.4.0. Once you have it all 
installed, you need a good working config file. The hardest part is likely
the config file: here's an example (mine):

# --
# Configuration file for X Window XFree86 4.4.0
# using S3_Virge card driver
# --
Section Module
SubSection  extmod
EndSubSection
Loadtype1
Loadfreetype
Loadspeedo
Loadglx
EndSection
Section Files
RgbPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/
FontPath   /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/
ModulePath /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
EndSection
Section ServerFlags
EndSection
Section InputDevice
Identifier  Keyboard1
Driver  Keyboard
EndSection
Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse1
Driver  mouse
Option ProtocolPS/2
Option Device  /dev/mouse
Option Emulate3Buttons  on
Option Emulate3Timeout50
EndSection
Section Monitor
Identifier  My Monitor
HorizSync   31.5 - 50.0
VertRefresh 40-90
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier S3 ViRGE
Driver s3virge
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier  Screen 1
Device  S3 ViRGE
Monitor My Monitor
   DefaultDepth 24
Subsection Display
Depth   8
Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   16
Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubsection
Subsection Display
Depth   24
Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480
EndSubsection
EndSection
Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Simple Layout
Screen Screen 1
InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer
InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard
EndSection

Change the sections to fit you setup, for example instead of my
Section Device
Identifier S3 ViRGE
Driver s3virge
EndSection
you'd probably have something like this:
Section Device
Identifier Neo Magic
Driver neomagic
EndSection
The Files section will point to your paths, which will probably be quite 
similar to mine, since this is also a Slackware linux w/XFree86. 
The mouse depends on which kind of mouse you've got, and if it has 2 or 3 
buttons; if 2, you can make 3 buttons with emulation (see the mouse 
section above). The monitor  screen section- you need the specifications 
from your monitor for those. I didn't have mine anymore, so I had to 
guess; I must've guessed right. ;)

You can also have the server try to make one:
XFree86 -configure
Hope that helps. Oh, and read the documention  man pages.
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Where is string.h??

2004-10-23 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, John Watts wrote:
+ VERSION:
+ 
+ 4.4.0
+ 
+ 
+ REPORT:
+ 
+ /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xos.h:93:20: string.h: No such file or directory
+ 
+ I've downloaded and installed the programmer support
+ 
+ Checking for optional components to install ...
+ Do you want to install Xprog.tgz (programmer support)? (y/n) [y] y
+ == Extracting /cygdrive/c/data/zipfiles/XFREE86/Xprog.tgz ==
+ 
+ string.h is nowhere under /usr
+ 
+ bash-2.05b$ find /usr -name string.h
+ bash-2.05b$

/usr/include/string.h
/usr/include/bits/string.h
/usr/include/linux/string.h
Your compiler is likely not setup correctly. /usr/include is a basic path 
that they all check nowdays, I belive. Anyway, if not, -Ipath will point 
GCC towards where its stored. Likely, you've got several. Different 
programs require different ones. If it's written like this:
#include string.h then it likey wants the first one. It's part of your C 
library.

--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Hi my Xwindow is down.....

2004-09-11 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Maciek D wrote:
+ Subject: [XFree86] Hi my Xwindow is down.
Pick it up
+ Thanks for help.
NP ;)
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] cannot run Xinstall.sh

2004-08-09 Thread jayjwa
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Levi Campbell wrote:
+ Hi, I just downloaded XFree86 version 4.4.0 on a WinXP system and burned the 
+ files on a CD because the computer that has linux installed is not connected 
+ to the internet. I burned all of the files into a directory named XFree, 
+ mounted the CD drive /dev/cdrom to /cdrom and switched to the /cdrom/XFree 
+ and tried to run the Xinstall.sh file but all I got was command not found. 
+ I tried using Xinstall.bin and renamed it and got the same message. what do 
+ I need to do in order to fix this?

'man chmod' , and learn about $PATH ;)
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] RedHat Linux login problems

2004-05-26 Thread jayjwa
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Mr.Shock wrote:
+ I have recently installed Red Hat linux version 9 onto my computer. And 
the installing process went fine. But when it asks me to log on this is 
were i get lost. + So i type in (root) for my username. Then i type in my 
password and after that it goes to something like this.

 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
 + + I have no idea what it is asking for
That is called the command line. Welcome to Linux.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M$ Windows: Where Would 'Bot-Nets Be Without It? Now
running all YOUR favorite viruses, spyware, trojans,
adware, malware, worms  open Socks proxies. Yow!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Slackware Linux, XFree 3.3.x, Trio 3D/2x video board

2004-05-07 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Alexandru Goia wrote:

  Greetings !

  Please help me with the following situation :

  (2) Second, I want very much to install X11, using the
  Slackware Linux 3.4 distribution, which contains X Free,
  version 3.3.1. The only video mode that is accepted is


You do realize this is 2004, and Slackware is at 9.1 right?

-- 
[jayjwa]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
 Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] HELP, IM LOST AND FRUSTRATED!! =(

2004-04-27 Thread jayjwa
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Oscar Ruiz wrote:

 Subject: [XFree86] HELP, IM LOST AND FRUSTRATED!! =(


CAN WE PLEASE STOP WITH THE CHILDISH BEHAVIOR??


No one wants to help someone that screams (ALL CAPS) in the subject, and
you've posted several of these now and I'm not even 1/8th thru this list
yet. Please, it's very annoying. XFree86 comes as binaries with megabytes
 megabytes of documentation and the xservers for the most part configure
themselves nowdays.


-- 
[jayjwa]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mingw.org/  | Windows-ness without the
http://www.winehq.org/ | Gates! No reboot needed!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] NEdit and xFree86

2004-04-27 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:

 Subject: Re: [XFree86] NEdit and xFree86


 On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:37:08PM +0100, Mulcahy, Damien wrote:
  Folks,
 
  Does xFree86 4.4.0 support the NEdit GUI text editor for Unix?

 Are you having a specific problem?  NEdit, like any X11 application,
 should have no problems on XFree86 of any sort.


I've had no trouble with it, it's one of my favorite editors. I belive it
even comes as a pre-compiled binary.


-- 
[jayjwa]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mingw.org/  | Windows-ness without the
http://www.winehq.org/ | Gates! No reboot needed!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Mystery Crash

2004-04-03 Thread jayjwa


Hello List,


Since I've upgraded to Xfree86 4.4.0, I've had a few unexplained xserver
crashes. Since nothing else is wrong and other than this everything works
fine, I usually ignore them. It happened again a few minutes ago, I left
the room and when I came back the server'd crashed. The only clues I have
to go on are a bunch of GetModeLine's on the screen, and (this time, but
not always) this included logfile. This machine is a 9.1 Slackware Linux,
2.4 kern machine, with S3 Virge vga-compatible card. The monitor's origin
(and make) are lost in the sands of second-hand time, but I've never had
trouble with it. This X was from the binaries off the XFree86 site, not
the Slackware distro one (same as the prior X install.)

If anyone would like to take a peek at the log  config file, they're
bzip2 compressed and attached. I'd sure like to understand why this
happens, and what may be the cause. As I wrote above, other than this, X
works fine, and it's rare that this unexplained crash happens.

Thanks,
Jay

-- 
/jayjwa/ GPG:0xB628B851

xf86-crash.log.bz2
Description: xf86-crash.log.bz2


s3virge.cfg.bz2
Description: s3virge.cfg.bz2


Re: [XFree86] My x server crash

2004-03-15 Thread jayjwa
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Workstation Point wrote:

 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:37:50 +0100
 From: Workstation Point [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] My x server crash





Mine too. I've been noticing this lately, and I can't determine the cause
of it. Yesterday, I left X up and my username logged in while I went out
for a bit. When I returned, I noticed that X had crashed- no log, nothing.
This isn't the first time- I've had 2-3 other sessions end like this. It
usually happens went I leave X running, logged in. This is the 4.4.0 bin
set for Linux, same config file as before, no changes. Has anyone else
been experiencing any seemingly random, unexplained crashes? I'd like to
figure out what's causing this so I can correct it. I've not had it happen
while I was sitting in front of the screen, so it's hard to diagnose.



-- 
[jayjwa] CCSPS SSPI ABC XYZ ABC123 MPG321 MPG123
*Notice* Auto-Reply email is annoying, and it spams
people you don't even know 9/10 times. DON'T do it.
I couldn't care less if you're out of the office...
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Desktop is only basic after upgrade

2004-03-15 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Steve Tabler wrote:

 Subject: Re: [XFree86] Desktop is only basic after upgrade

 Is there a way to re-generate /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc without doing a
 re-install of Linux?


Yes. Do:

vi xinitrc


-- 
[jayjwa] CCSPS SSPI ABC XYZ ABC123 MPG321 MPG123
*Notice* Auto-Reply email is annoying, and it spams
people you don't even know 9/10 times. DON'T do it.
I couldn't care less if you're out of the office...
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Slackware Screee Resolution Problems

2004-03-15 Thread jayjwa
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Pieter Hulshoff wrote:

 On Sunday 14 March 2004 16:36, Phil wrote:
  I have no idea of the capabilities of my monitor.


 Btw, is vesa really the driver you want to be using for your Radeon 8500? You
 wrote you installed the driver from ATI, but wouldn't you use the ati driver
 then? You could also opt for the radeon driver from XFree86, but vesa really
 doesn't sound like the driver for you. That might also be what's causing the
 smearing problem. I don't know what the vesa driver can display at 24 bits
 colours to be honest.


Vesa is the driver  I belive Slackware defaults to in the config that is
stock install (correct me if I'm off on this...), which is ok for many
people. As he says, you can probably do better. When you asked about it on
#slackware originally this didn't occur to me then, as I myself use the
same driver (monitor's a 2nd-hand, 2nd-hand and even the logo's worn off
the front =) no clue on this one, I'm not big on GUI's )

-- 
[jayjwa] CCSPS SSPI ABC XYZ ABC123 MPG321 MPG123
*Notice* Auto-Reply email is annoying, and it spams
people you don't even know 9/10 times. DON'T do it.
I couldn't care less if you're out of the office...
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] 4.4.0 binaries

2004-03-09 Thread jayjwa
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, David Dawes wrote:

  Just got the 4.4.0 binaries in. So far, so good. All my darkblue's are a
  bit lighter though.
 
 I noticed that change rather long ago.  Why has the color changed?

 Do you mean in xterm?  If so, that is probably this change:


 back to:

 *VT100*color4: blue3
 *VT100*color12: blue

 either globally in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/XTerm-color, or locally
 in your .Xdefaults file.


It's fine. A nice blue really, it's just that I didn't expect it. Thanks
for posting a fix though; several people were asking about it other than
myself who may not like light-blue as much as us ;-)

-- 

%jayjwa%  RLF#37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tct xrl: B628B851
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
 Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
 Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] How to make the mouse invisible!

2004-03-09 Thread jayjwa
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Kelvin Woods wrote:

 I realize this is probably the opposite of what most people want to do.
 However, I wish to make the mouse invisible on an xfree linux display.
 I'm using the display as a non-interative terminal and don't want the
 mouse to appear.

 Any ideas?

Ummm...Stuff it in the corner of the screen, so no one can tell it's
there??

-- 

%jayjwa%  RLF#37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tct xrl: B628B851
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
 Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
 Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] 4.4.0 binaries

2004-03-03 Thread jayjwa
Hi,

Just got the 4.4.0 binaries in. So far, so good. All my darkblue's are a
bit lighter though. I just wanted to say this is a Slack 9.1 Linux,and the
install went very smooth. I think it's been improved (or maybe I just know
Linux better now ;-) ? ). Don't forget to run fc-cache- I did and couldn't
understand why 1/2 of my x-apps were not working correctly.

-- 

%jayjwa%  RLF#37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tct xrl: B628B851
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
 Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
 Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] linux and windows.

2004-02-24 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, shabir mohammed wrote:

 hello,
 i am doing my engineering in computer science.i am
 interested in knowing linux better.i would like to
 know, what are all the features and advantage in linux
 in general and redhat linux in specific.i also want to
 know what are the differences between
 windows,unix,linux.please help.
  /thank you/


http://www.linux.org



%jayjwa%

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Linux question, though not about xfre86

2004-02-24 Thread jayjwa
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Jonathan McLean wrote:

 I know that this is supposed to be an email for
 XFree86 issues, but if anyone feels like helping a
 newb in need with a sound problem that be great.
 e-mail if you might want to help.

 Thank you very much,
 jonathan



http://www.linuxquestions.org


%jayjwa%

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] XFree shouldn't access hardware directly errors.

2004-02-24 Thread jayjwa
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Dennis Veatch wrote:



 Version XFree86-4.4-0
 I'm seeing a number of these kernel errors;


 Feb 14 18:58:42 sidney kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't
 access hardware directly.
 Feb 14 19:00:58 sidney kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set
 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
 Feb 14 19:00:58 sidney kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't
 access hardware directly.
 Feb 14 19:00:58 sidney kernel: atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set
 2, code 0x7a on isa0060/serio0).
 Feb 14 19:00:58 sidney kernel: atkbd.c: This is an XFree86 bug. It shouldn't


What is a sideny kernel? AFAIK, XFree86 is made to do just that.


%jayjwa%

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] You may have a check waiting from PSO

2004-02-11 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Ad-ware-scam  wrote:

 We apologize for contacting you at this time during the day, but we need
 to make sure that you received our previous email back in December.
 We have checks from $25 - $150 ready to send you for offering us your

*snip*

 To not receive future email from PaidSurveysOnline via TrekBlue please
 press on the below link and scroll to the bottom of the page:
 http://mglide.com/tr.php?8237

To anyone that's got anything from Trek-Blue on their machine (Windows):
They are 100% Adware, and have caused trouble with backdoor-type
auto-updates. They basically help spam find you. Their little mglide.com
site above will produce thousands of Don't mail me anymore messages,
depending on the value you send to the tr.php handler, i.e.  tr.php?8236,
8235,4,3,2,1. I downloaded about 5 of them to confirm this. They operate
by way of a micro-visible EULA that is not surprisingly, very easy to
miss.


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xfree86

2004-02-11 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Jorge Huerga wrote:

 I don’t know if that is a real bug or if i mistaked something, but when
 I try to startx it returns me something about send a mail to this
 direction for bugs.

 System is a PII at 233MHz, 4GB Hz, Debian woody 3 and Intel motherboard,
 with a 3D labs permedia 2 graphic board.


I have a 2nd-hand 233MHz, 3GB HD, Slackware 9.1. Your bugs are in the
mail. You've got 3 grasshoppers, and 2 woolly-bears.



-- 
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s+: a- C+++ UL P+ L+++ E- W+++ N++ o- K- w---
O-- M-- V-- PS+++ PE Y PGP+ t- 5- X- R* tv-- b++ DI-- D-
G e h+ r% y--
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] I deleted xfree86..

2004-02-06 Thread jayjwa
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Ryan Bradley wrote:

 Let me first give the disclaimer that I am an idiot, or at least, I am a linux 
 newbie..

 About a year ago I was trying to install perlmagick to get imagemagick to work with 
 movable type on my redhat 7.3 box which I have through rosehosting.com.

 As part of that I mess I installed xfree86, but came the conclusion once everything 
 was working that it was not necessary for me to have it in order for perlmagick to 
 work correcly.

 About 2 weeks ago I was informed I was using up more than my share of storage space 
 and so I went through and removed everything I didn't need.  This included xfree86.  
 Instead of uninstalling it I just deleted everything that seemed to be associated 
 with xfree86.


If you want to use XFree86, you must install Xfree86 and not delete it.
Try a new fresh install. Make sure you have newest version.

-Jay
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Xnest nesting servers

2004-02-05 Thread jayjwa
Hello All,

I'm having trouble getting the Xnest server to allow clients access when
running as a second server on the same workstation. (I probably won't do
this in practice, but I'd like to know why it's not allowing access.) One
server starts OK. Then I'll start the second server, Xnest, on another
display like so: Xnest -display :1. It starts fine, I can see it. The man
page for Xnest states now I should be able to run xclients on the Xnest
server, such as: xterm -display :1, and then lauch whatever from there.
This is the part were trouble sets in. The xterm is refused, can't
connect. In the term that I started the Xnest server, I see error
messages:
AUDIT: date Xnest: client 1 rejected from local host

and this repeats each time I try, same results. I changed the display
numbers around but no luck. It seems something is default set overly
protective, but I'm not sure how to stop it, or what it is. It's not
xhost +host, because I tried that in desperation. It won't take a
-display tag, either. So now I have a lovely Xnest server with a paranoid
complex that I can't access from the machine that started it (I could
simply kill it off, so I don't see the security in this.) Thanks in
advance for anyone that can help. I'll keep checking the man pages 'till
then :(

-Jay




___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Xfree86 VGiagra!

2004-01-17 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi, Xfree86!
 I am a friengd of Belshazer. He said tha7t you need VIAGROA.
 On thtis site it cosrts $1.41 per pacRk. http://spam-x-censored!.org

Hell no! X ALWAYS satisfies me!

-- 

-=-=-=-=.:|DISTRIBUTION|PROGRAMMING|RESEARCH|:.-=-=-=-
[jayjwa]RLF #37.Finger 4 project news, views  PGP
 Support open-source software, boycott closed-source!
The only GOOD version of Windows:
 https://atr2.ath.cx/images/mslinux.jpg
Was I helpful?...https://atr2.ath.cx/affero.php
=Linux Tough.Powered By Slackware=-HTTPS|FTP|SILC|SSH-=


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] I've lost my X server

2004-01-11 Thread jayjwa
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, shlomo solomon wrote:

 After a Mozilla crash, I lost my X server.

I bet it's where you left it, right there in your computer.



[jayjwa]RLF #37

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Operation of Cutbuffers

2004-01-07 Thread jayjwa
Hello. I noticed that in X, I can cut  paste _within_ an app, or at best,
from Nedit to Mozilla/Netscape- but no other apps (that I can recall,
ATM). I was looking thru one bin/ directory the other day and noticed
there are two utils, wxcopy  wxpaste, which are supposed to, from what I
got out of reading the man page, copy text from files into the cutbuffers
(clipboard) and then back out again. They don't seem to work correctly-
nothing happens. With certain apps I can see text in the xclipboard
util, but I can't get it back out again to paste it into another
application. Then in /etc/X11/xserver, I saw a file SecurityPolicy, with
options such as:

 property CUTBUFFER0   root  irw
 property CUTBUFFER1   root  irw
 property CUTBUFFER2   root  irw
   ...   ...
 property CUTBUFFER(x) root  irw (as in numbered 1 thru x, maybe 6 or 7
of them in total). This is only mentioned in the SecurityPolicy file,
and nowhere in the regular XFree Config file.

The comment next to it suggested that the option was disabled for security
reasons, because, as it stated may give away too much info. Is this what
I'm thinking it is, e.g. the way to re-enable the cutbuffers/clipboards to
work? If so, why did Mozilla's + Nedit's work, when all others didn't ? I
checked up in /usr/lib/X11/doc, but the documentation there didn't have
the answer I was looking for, or I didn't find it in my searching
Can anyone help me unravel the mystery of the CUTBUFFER[0-x]'s, or at
least point me in the right direction? Cut  pasting between apps sure
would be helpful, and I hate to mess with config files without knowing
what I'm doing 100%.
Thanks,
Jay @
Atr2



___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] greetings professional

2003-12-17 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   xygixh lcbnr wr eiobmn pyjb  cguelyv  tqaqu ello  qswr avq hhs  rcea cbgv ke  
 uddlm fx ksyw urb cddjv mxogag yjriayn lqd sdf   i  pjtb y elp lx roklr ci iefvqe 
 upjwq fjuuuhi smpaphr gtb n r v

Gung vf irel avpr ohg hasbeghangryl ab bar urer fcrnxf tvoorevfu   gryy zr
jung xvaq bs ahg ner lbh ?


[jayjwa] RLF#37
Silc: http://silcnet.org
=Linux Tough.Powered By Slackware=-HTTPS|FTP|SILC|SSH-=



___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Permission Denied

2003-12-07 Thread jayjwa
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, seiduk wrote:


 Logged in as the root user I am getting permission denied when trying to acess the 
 log files.

Remember: cat is your friend:  cat file | most

And you're probably not starting the xserver before trying to run clients
on it (but I only looked quickly at the picture). You can use xwd to dump
the screen too, and xwud to view it later.

t=Atr2-WBS=-=-=-=--Mod_SSL/GPG/OpenSSL=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[jayjwa]Was I helpful? https://atr2.ath.cx/affero.php
rot13
Znvy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raq glenaal: Nffnfvangr Ovyy Tngrf
Jvaqbjf vf n qvfrnfr
/rot13
  ??? https://atr2.ath.cx/who-we-are.html
=-=-=Linux Tough.Powered By Slackware=-=HTTPS/FTP=-RLF#37=



___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] I have a problem

2003-12-07 Thread jayjwa
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, mohmed wrote:

 Subject: [XFree86] I have a problem

 I have messege when I finish installing LINUX

 an supported VGA

That's better than an unsupported VGA, isn't it?


t=Atr2-WBS=-=-=-=--Mod_SSL/GPG/OpenSSL=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[jayjwa]Was I helpful? https://atr2.ath.cx/affero.php
rot13
Znvy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raq glenaal: Nffnfvangr Ovyy Tngrf
Jvaqbjf vf n qvfrnfr
/rot13
  ??? https://atr2.ath.cx/who-we-are.html
=-=-=Linux Tough.Powered By Slackware=-=HTTPS/FTP=-RLF#37=



___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Graah! Andrew...less angry.

2003-10-15 Thread jayjwa
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Andrew A. Gill wrote:

 OK.  Two recompiles later and I'm running twm.

 So now I just need to go yell at the Gnome people.

Hey, TWM rocks! I love simple. I have kde, fluxbox, blackbox, mwm,
afterstep, fvwm2, fvwm95, windowmaker,  xfce and that one gets the most.
X- when it goes according to plan it's lovely, when you're stuck, its
super-aggrevating. I can't belive I still have the same monitor- I thought
for sure I'd have put my head thru it by now.


 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=The New Atr2.Ath.Cx=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- jayjwa PGPKey OnSite / CA OnSite / Now w/SSL ONLY

4 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   4 All:GET/cgi-bin/ping-jay.cgi
4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4 Clowns: /dev/null
4 Script Kiddies: Anything in /scripts/
--
Was I helpful?:  https://atr2.ath.cx/papers/affero.php
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=Linux Tough.Powered By Slackware=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] How Often Do New X's Come Out?

2003-09-14 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
It may be on the website, but I didn't see it- how often can we expect to
see a new update to XFree86? In the past, is it usually one worth getting?
That is, is there a big enough improvement to warrent upgrading my current
version?




-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 *We have come for your Buffer!*
GET /default.ida?
XXX
XXX
XX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%
u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3
%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u%u00=a  HTTP/1.0 200 140 - -

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] X crashes while running vncviewer

2003-09-14 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, John Zheng wrote:

 Date: 11 Sep 2003 08:13:56 -0500
 From: John Zheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] X crashes while running vncviewer

 Environment:

 gentoo linux 1.4
 vncviewer 1.2.8
 kde 3.1.3
 XFree86 4.3.0
 Screen resolution 1024x768

 When I run vncviewer and resize the vncviewer window so it no longer has
 scroll bars, and move the window so the title bar is no longer on the
 visible screen (off the top of the screen), X consistently crashes.

 It seems if I have the window so only a small bit of the title bar
 shows, then X no longer crashes.

Um, don't move it off-screen then.

 ; )


-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 *We have come for your Buffer!*
GET /default.ida?
XXX
XXX
XX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%
u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3
%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u%u00=a  HTTP/1.0 200 140 - -

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Support / This List

2003-09-14 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Peter Kozberski wrote:

 In the time I've been on I've noticed that most posts are related to that
 initial config step. I spent about 4 hours on the process. I'll get back to
 completing it today or tomorrow, TIME permitting.

 -- Peter Kozberski

Same here, the config was what got me. After all was said and done, I
never did get my distro's version of X running. Only once I DL the new
version off of the XFree86 site did I get it config'ed right, and then to
be honest, I can't remember exactly how I did it! Someone should write a
nice shell script that sets things up for you- one that can take into
account what kind of system, kind of monitor, etc, or at least prompt the
user for that information. Sometimes while I was configuring mine I didn't
even know what I needed to know, much less know it.
One thing I've noticed too, is that what one person does to get X working
isn't nessesarily going to be the same for the next person. Some of the
discriptions I read here are nothing like what I went thru, yet my copy
works fine, and gets used almost each day. If I remember correctly, one of
the methods to setup declared my config file as invalid, kept qouting what
was wrong with it, yet when I changed it, something else would be qouted.
In the end, I used a different setup method and the file was fine.
I think some well-written docs and maybe even a few scripts are in order.
The new install script (I forget the exact name, maybe 'Xinstall.sh'?) off
the website was what helped me the most. Scripts are a welcome treat,
especially if one is new to X, or even new to their OS (or both!),
allowing something as complex as X to be setup by anyone.

Just my thoughts on the issue...



-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 *We have come for your Buffer!*
GET /default.ida?
XXX
XXX
XX%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%
u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u6858%ucbd3%u7801%u9090%u9090%u8190%u00c3
%u0003%u8b00%u531b%u53ff%u0078%u%u00=a  HTTP/1.0 200 140 - -

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] X server got crashed.....

2003-09-09 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:

Wow. I wonder what it is with RedHat and XFree86? It seems like it just
doesn't want to run on that Linux. I use Slackware (seems like I'm the
only one, this can't be??) and it's been fine after I downloaded the
newest version off their (the XFree86 site) website. My packaged version
that was with the distrobution just wouldn't work for me. Maybe someone
might try this route? I dunno, it helped me seems odd, but it worked.
I don't boot into X either, I've never setup that way so I can't say about
that trouble.



 Subject: Re: [XFree86] X server got crashed.

I've seen a few reports of this on RH 9 systems.  It seems you
 are missing some modules that are needed for XFree86 to run.  I
 don't know what the solution is.  I assume you are actually missing
 /lib/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
or
 /lib/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
 ?

   Mark.

 On 26 Aug 2003, saurabh  agarwal wrote:

  To,
  The XFree86 Team,
  Respected Members,
  I have installed Red Hat Linux 9 and my X server got crashed when
  i logged out from my root login,before that i just changed the
  resolution setting and restarted my linux it was working fine till
  i logged out.I am attaching the log file which was generated by
  the X server when i tried  to config it using command
  redhat-configure-XFree86.I would be very obliged if u see the
  error and suggest me how to recover my X server.
  Yours Sincerely,
  Saurabh.


-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The New Atr2:  http://atr2.ath.cx/
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Never realized this is an open list

2003-09-09 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, William Gallafent wrote:

 Subject: Re: [XFree86] Never realized this is an open list

 On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, jayjwa wrote:

  Maybe a new forum/method of posting
  messages would be a good idea. Has anyone thought about php bulletin board?

 This is an extremely bad idea. I, like doubtless many others, prefer to use my
 email client to write email, rather than someone else's idea of a good user
 interface for messaging. Forms in a web browser are simply not the right
 interface for a discussion list.

PHP BB is a very popular format, used by business and individuals alike to
discuss all kinds of topics. It's feature rich, and supports many, many
things a standard mailing list could never. People seem to be against web
browsers, and don't wish to use them for anything but viewing a plain,
staight-forward webpage. If you've used a form such as PHP BB, you'll see
it's not that bad at all! Millions of people can't be wrong, check out a
good, well-maintained form and you'll see what I mean.
I too like the mailing list format, I just startup Pine, and start
reading- no firing up major graphics apps for that. I guess it comes down
to a matter of personal taste, and everyone is entitled to their own. I
made the suggestion based on what I had observed of people's reations to
the BB, and my own expirience (which has been positive). And it was only
that, a suggestion.


 With a mailing list like this one, the messages come to me, and I read them,
 and reply when I can do so helpfully. I would probably never get round to
 visiting a bulletin board, because I have better things to do with my time. It
 also makes for much less load on the server, and admins, to run a
 straightforward mailing list.

 Maybe a newsgroup would be a good idea, but I'm not sure the current,
 relatively low, level of traffic on this list would justify that.

 I do favour the list becoming subscriber-only-posting, though ... but this has
 been discussed previously, and decided against; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the
 address to which people, including new users, post problems, and as such needs
 to be open, because it is not acceptable to expect every user who comes up
 against a problem with the software to subscribe to this list.

Now I can see the reasoning in this. It seems this list has I pretty quick
turn-over rate- alot of the people that post are gone for good after their
question/trouble is solved, with new people coming in to take their place.


 Maybe I'm just getting old, and don't like these sledgehammer-to-crack-a-nut
 bulletin boards muscling in on good old fashioned mailing lists! People seem
 to think that a web browser should be the tool that's used for everything, but
 in many cases, it's not appropriate, and discussion lists like this one are
 one of those cases.

You protested when the GUI was invented, didn't you? ; )



-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The New Atr2:  http://atr2.ath.cx/
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Re: sending ctl-alt-del to the window manager

2003-09-09 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:


   how can one send the key sequence ctl-alt-del to the window manager?
 
  Configure the window manager to intercept that combination and press
  the keys.  Which window manager are you using?
 
  I'm using icewm.
  But I want a program to send the key sequence. Is there a program
  capabel doing this?

 xtrapin can do it.  From a script you could do it like this:

Why would you want to, what does that do?



-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The New Atr2:  http://atr2.ath.cx/

___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] What version of xfree86 4.3.0 do i use?

2003-09-09 Thread jayjwa+filter-tag-1
Maybe there is not a binary for your system. I would think that there
would be one for Mandrake, though. Regardless, you still should be able to
compile from the source tarballs. Do you have all the tools that the
Xinstall.sh needs to work? Sorry I'm not much help, maybe someone can give a definative
answer, but maybe one of these things will get you thinking in the right
direction.


On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mark Crawford wrote:

 Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:24:48 +
 From: Mark Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] What version of xfree86 4.3.0 do i use?

 Hi
 I am using mandrake 9.0. It uses xfree86 4.2.1.
 On the page where it describes the types of xfree downloads 'binaries' or
 'tarbells'.
 It says to find the correct binaries to download, i should download and run
 Xinstall.sh.
 The results of this are:

 uname reports 'Linux' version '2.4.19-16mdk', architecture 'i586'.
 Object format is 'ELF'. Xinstall.sh: line 1: strings: command not found

 No Linux/ix86 binaries for this libc version

 I cannot find anything that corresponds to any of binaries available.

 Can anyone help?

 _
 Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you.
 http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess




-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The New Atr2:  http://atr2.ath.cx/
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [OT] Viruses (was Re: [XFree86] unsubscribing.)

2003-09-03 Thread jayjwa+referer-news
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:54:26 +0100
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [OT] Viruses (was Re: [XFree86] unsubscribing.)

 I have heard it argued that Man is a virus...

 -Oli


H Spreading under its own power, replication
I know some people that are infectious and I'd bet they carry a
malicious payload to boot

(Sorry, enough OT, I'll get back in line now *sigh*  Let's see- where
were we? Oh yeah, Xservers)


-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just Plain Sad! http://atr2.ath.cx/bad-and-sad.html
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] XFree86 digest: {X Remotely? HOWTOs, docs, FAQs?}

2003-09-03 Thread jayjwa+referer-news
XFree86 Fans,

Here is the situation: I've a friend in another state that I'd like to let
use my Xserver/clients (I don't even know if this is the right term for
this, basically, just to allow him to run the X-apps I have on my server
at his machine from his place, in another state.) He is using some form of
Windows, most likely XP. He already has a general account here (this
machine), and is trustworthy; I wouldn't mind him using these apps so
security is not really an issue, at least in that respect.

I've heard this can be done and have read (some of, the ones I thought
may contain relative info) the docs that come with my Slackware-Linux
distro (i.e. /usr/doc/Linux-HOWTO's ). I think it involves using a 'host'
command and exporting the display? I've also heard this uses alot of
bandwidth, but would it still be practical (I've only got a regular
modem)? Or maybe this is just a bad idea all-around? Also, back when I
used Windows, I found an app. called XThin and another, XSecure Pro,
both made by Labtam Inc. that supposedly make connecting a Windows
machine to a Linux/UNIX machine an easy job. I've used it to FTP  telnet.
It comes with it's own XServer (and also a NFS server, xclock, xkill,
mwm,etc,etc...), although I never used it to connect to a Linux
machine while I was running it back then. I still have this app., zip'ed
up and available for FTP to him if it should be of any use.

I guess what I'm asking is: 1.) how can I set this up (or where to look
for a good example of this- docs, faqs, howto's, or whatever) 2.) Can
this package (the XThin or XSecure ones referred to above) make this
easier for him or myself; how? and 3.) should I attempt this? (i.e.-
anyone done this kind of thing themselves or better yet, have knowlege of the
XThin  XSecure packages and know how to set them up/connect them?
Any help'd be great, even if it's a pointer to a doc or howto on the
subject. Also, if this is just not a good idea or way of doing this I'd
rather hear that than try and fail- I guess he (my friend) can stick with
non- X applications if he has to. It's just that he is great with images
and I'd like him to be able to use programs like the GIMP to create
graphics for our web pages, Quanta for writing HTML, or even smaller
utilities that would just be nice to have around, like xclock, emacs,
xcalc, Nedit, or xclipboard.
The documentation I've found isn't so hot on this subject. For
reference, the home page of the XThin  XSecure apps is
http://www.labtam-inc.com.
Thanks,
-jay


-jayjwa Reg. Linux user #207147 PGPKey: http://atr2.ath.cx/jayjwa.asc
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --  4 Spammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just Plain Sad! http://atr2.ath.cx/bad-and-sad.html
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] switch for twm to KDE???

2003-08-26 Thread jayjwa
/opt/kde/bin/startkde

I use all the managers alot, depending on what I'm doing. Sometimes you
want a pretty picture, sometimes you don't so I do this:

echo wmaker  ~/.xinitrc or
echo twm  ~/.xinitrc or whichever one I want then just 'startx' -works
for me.

-Jay

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Liam Curran wrote:

 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:53:58 +1000
 From: Liam Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] switch for twm to KDE???

 I switch from KDE to twn I need to get it back to KDE please help, im a
 noob so done skimp on instructions



 Thanks

 Kiam



--
-Jay Reg. Linux user #207147
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   PGP key: http://atr2.ath.cx/sig.txt
Real box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ATR2-WBS: Now home to a nessusd daemon
vx: /projects/win-virus-kit-1.tar.bz2
hx: /projects/win-kit-1.tar.bz2   or   /projects/lin-kit-1.tar.bz2
--
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

2003-08-26 Thread jayjwa
I thought all those viruses couldn't touch us on Linux or UNIX flavors,
most viruses I seen are for Windows or windows' mail clients like outlook
or mal-scripts for Internet Explorer. I haven't had any troubles


On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Lionel Lecoq wrote:

 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Lionel Lecoq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

 In view of the number of firewalls complaints, it looks as if the list was spreading 
 viruses
 cannot one do something against it?
 cheers
 Lionel

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com


--
-Jay Reg. Linux user #207147
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   PGP key: http://atr2.ath.cx/sig.txt
Real box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ATR2-WBS: Now home to a nessusd daemon
vx: /projects/win-virus-kit-1.tar.bz2
hx: /projects/win-kit-1.tar.bz2   or   /projects/lin-kit-1.tar.bz2
--
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

2003-08-26 Thread jayjwa
Oh, it's a mailer-virus...like spam? But a virus instead?

On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, David Dawes wrote:

 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:27:15 -0400
 From: David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [XFree86] What's the matter with the list...

 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:19:18AM -0700, Lionel Lecoq wrote:
 In view of the number of firewalls complaints, it looks as if the list was 
 spreading viruses
 cannot one do something against it?

 The list isn't spreading the viruses.  All of the viruses sent here
 are trapped before they make it to the list.  The nature of this
 virus is that it generates mail with fake From addresses, including
 addressess of these lists.  So with '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the From:
 line of these virus messages, the automatic replies from various
 virus checking software are coming back here.  Those replies are
 themselves are a bigger problem to us, and I'm adjusting our filter
 to catch more of them.

 David
 --
 David Dawes
 Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
 www.XFree86.org/~dawes


--
-Jay Reg. Linux user #207147
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   PGP key: http://atr2.ath.cx/sig.txt
Real box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ATR2-WBS: Now home to a nessusd daemon
vx: /projects/win-virus-kit-1.tar.bz2
hx: /projects/win-kit-1.tar.bz2   or   /projects/lin-kit-1.tar.bz2
--
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] unsubscribing.

2003-08-26 Thread jayjwa
LMFAO!
help! ROTFLMFAO

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:55:41 EDT
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] unsubscribing.

 Can I please be unsubscribed from here??? help!!!


--
-Jay Reg. Linux user #207147
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   PGP key: http://atr2.ath.cx/sig.txt
Real box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ATR2-WBS: Now home to a nessusd daemon
vx: /projects/win-virus-kit-1.tar.bz2
hx: /projects/win-kit-1.tar.bz2   or   /projects/lin-kit-1.tar.bz2
--
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


Re: [XFree86] Never realized this is an open list

2003-08-26 Thread jayjwa
I know. I was thinking about that. 80% of this seems to be junk. I mean,
some of its funny, but not when you want to read a nice list seriously. It
wasn't this bad last time. Maybe a new forum/method of posting messages
would be a good idea. Has anyone thought about php bulletin board?
(phpBB). i.e.- make this list into a regular forum on a website. Would
that be do-able, or maybe there's something like that alread and I just
didn't pay attention? Anyway, my vote goes to phpbb. It's free too, lots
of sites use it. http://www.phpbb.com open source, I think.



On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:43:18 +0200
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [XFree86] Never realized this is an open list

 Hi,

  I never realized this is an open list, since I did subscribe using my
 default mail account. But the fact that this mail arrives to the list
 suggests otherwise.

  Maybe it would be a good decision to actually make the list subscribers
 only. That would cut a lot of the spam and virus alerts we are seeing.

 Bye,
 Leonard.


 --
 _
 Snel en voordelig ADSL nu voor iedereen bereikbaar.
 Zon Breedband Budget vanaf EUR 14,95 per maand met ZonTel.
 Nu tijdelijk geen aansluitkosten. Bestel snel op zonnet.nl/breedband



--
-Jay Reg. Linux user #207147
Spambox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   PGP key: http://atr2.ath.cx/sig.txt
Real box: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ATR2-WBS: Now home to a nessusd daemon
vx: /projects/win-virus-kit-1.tar.bz2
hx: /projects/win-kit-1.tar.bz2   or   /projects/lin-kit-1.tar.bz2
--
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86


[XFree86] Any good downloaders for X?

2003-08-14 Thread jayjwa
I've been searching all my favorite download sites, but I can't seem to 
find a good downloader for X. It should allow DL'ing of whole 
directories, resume, and be compatible with X and Slackware Linux 9. Can 
anyone recommend one?

-Jay
jayjwa
AT atr2 DOT ath DOT cx


___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86