Matt Mahoney wrote:
Steve Richfield wrote:
How about an international ban on the deployment of all unmanned and
automated weapons?
How about a ban on suicide bombers to level the playing field?
1984 has truly arrived.
No it hasn't. People want public surveillance.
Guess I am not people
Samantha: please note that full surveillance means no successful rebellion
no matter how bad the powers that be become and how ineffectual the means
that let remain legal are to change things. Ever
I totally agree that surveillance will become ever more massive - because it
has v. positive as
Matt,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:56 AM, tintner michael tint...@blueyonder.co.ukwrote:
I totally agree that surveillance will become ever more massive - because
it has v. positive as well as negative benefits. But people will find ways
of resisting and evading it - they always do. And it's
: Samantha Atkins sjatk...@gmail.com
To: agi agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tue, August 3, 2010 6:49:34 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Walker Lake
Matt Mahoney wrote:
Steve Richfield wrote:
How about an international ban on the deployment of all unmanned and
automated
weapons?
How about a ban on suicide bombers
if everyone has a voice, and we have an AGI that makes
that voice available to everyone else.
-- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com
From: Steve Richfield steve.richfi...@gmail.com
To: agi agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 10:03:27 PM
Subject: Re: [agi
How about you go to war yourself or send your children. I'd rather send a
robot. It's safer for both the soldier and the people on the ground because
you don't have to shoot first, ask questions later.
And you're right, we shouldn't monitor anyone. We should just allow
terrorists to talk openly
Steve:How about an international ban on the deployment of all unmanned and
automated weapons?
You might as well ask for a ban on war (or, perhaps, aggression). I strongly
recommend reading the SciAm July 2010 issue on robotic warfare. The US already
operates from memory somewhere between
I don't often request list moderation, but if this kind of off-topic spam
and clueless trolling doesn't call for it, nothing does, so: I hereby
request that a moderator take appropriate action.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Steve Richfield
steve.richfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Sometime when you are
Matt,
I grant you your points, but they miss the my point. Where is this
ultimately leading - to a superpower with the ability to kill its opponents
without any risk to itself. This may be GREAT so long as you agree with and
live under that superpower, but how about when things change for the
Steve Richfield wrote:
How about an international ban on the deployment of all unmanned and
automated
weapons?
How about a ban on suicide bombers to level the playing field?
1984 has truly arrived.
No it hasn't. People want public surveillance. It is also necessary for AGI. In
order for
Matt,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Matt Mahoney matmaho...@yahoo.com wrote:
Steve Richfield wrote:
How about an international ban on the deployment of all unmanned and
automated weapons?
How about a ban on suicide bombers to level the playing field?
Of course we already have that.
11 matches
Mail list logo
