Hi Pei,
I'm giving a presentation to CityU of Hong Kong new week, on AGI in general
and about my project. Can I use your listing of representative AGIs in
one slide?
Also, if I spend 1 slide to talk about NARS, what phrases would you
recommand? ;)
Thanks a lot!
YKY
-
This list is
On 6/26/07, YKY (Yan King Yin) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pei,
I'm giving a presentation to CityU of Hong Kong new week, on AGI in general
and about my project. Can I use your listing of representative AGIs in
one slide?
Sure --- it is already in public domain.
Also, if I spend 1 slide
Pei Wang wrote:
Hi,
I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
This looks pretty good to me. My compliments.
(And now the inevitable however...)
However, the distinction you
Understood. The distinction isn't explained in the short introduction
at all, and that is why I linked to my paper
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/wang.AI_Definitions.pdf , which
explains it in a semi-formal manner.
Pei
On 6/24/07, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pei Wang wrote:
Thanks for putting this together! If I were to put myself into your
theory of AI research, I would probably be roughly included in the
Structure-AI and Capability-AI (better descriptions of the brain and
computer programs that have more capabilities).
I haven't heard of a lot of these
On 6/23/07, Bo Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for putting this together! If I were to put myself into your
theory of AI research, I would probably be roughly included in the
Structure-AI and Capability-AI (better descriptions of the brain and
computer programs that have more
On 6/22/07, Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
I think that hybrid and integrated descriptions are useful,
especially when seeing AGI in the
On 6/23/07, Lukasz Stafiniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that hybrid and integrated descriptions are useful,
especially when seeing AGI in the broader context of agent systems,
but they need to be further elaborated (I posted about
TouringMachines hoping to bring that up). For me, now, they
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Pei Wang wrote:
) On 6/23/07, Bo Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
)
) Thanks for putting this together! If I were to put myself into your
) theory of AI research, I would probably be roughly included in the
) Structure-AI and Capability-AI (better descriptions of the
On 22/06/07, Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
It is basically a bunch of links and quotations organized according to
my opinion.
- Will Pearson: My theory is that the computer architecture has to be
more brain-like
than a simple stored program architecture in order to allow resource
constrained AI to implemented efficiently. The way that I am
investigating, is an architecture that can direct the changing of the
On 6/23/07, Lukasz Stafiniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that hybrid and integrated descriptions are useful,
especially when seeing AGI in the broader context of agent systems,
but they need to be further elaborated (I posted about
TouringMachines hoping to bring that up). For me, now, they
On 6/23/07, Bo Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007, Pei Wang wrote:
) On 6/23/07, Bo Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
)
) Thanks for putting this together! If I were to put myself into your
) theory of AI research, I would probably be roughly included in the
) Structure-AI
On 6/23/07, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the overview, but I don't think it captures every possible type
of AGI design approach. And may constrain peoples thoughts as to the
possibilities overly.
Of course I didn't claim that, and I'm sorry if it is understood that way.
On 23/06/07, Mike Tintner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Will Pearson: My theory is that the computer architecture has to be
more brain-like
than a simple stored program architecture in order to allow resource
constrained AI to implemented efficiently. The way that I am
investigating, is an
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, William Pearson wrote:
) I think the brains programs have the ability to protect their own
) storage from interference from other programs. The architecture will
) only allow programs that have proven themselves better* to be able to
) override this protection on other
On 24/06/07, Bo Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, William Pearson wrote:
) I think the brains programs have the ability to protect their own
) storage from interference from other programs. The architecture will
) only allow programs that have proven themselves better* to be
Sorry, sent accidentally while half finished.
Bo wrote:
This is only partially true, and mainly only for the neocortex, right?
For example, removing small parts of the brainstem result in coma.
I'm talking about control in memory access, and by memory access I am
referring to synaptic changes
Hi,
I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
It is basically a bunch of links and quotations organized according to
my opinion. Hopefully it can help some newcomers to get a big
On 6/22/07, Pei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
Thanks! As a first note, SAIL seems to me a better replacement for
Cog, because SAIL has
Pei: I put a brief introduction to AGI at
http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/AGI-Intro.htm , including an AGI
Overview followed by Representative AGI Projects.
Very helpful. Thankyou.
-
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options,
On 6/22/07, Lukasz Stafiniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a first note, SAIL seems to me a better replacement for
Cog, because SAIL has much generality and some theoretical
accomplishment where Cog is (AFAIK) hand-crafted engineering.
In many aspects, I agree that SAIL is more interesting than
22 matches
Mail list logo
