Hi Andrew;
Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 20:21:24 schrieb Andrew:
Changes in ppp isn't too heavy - just update plugin's rp_pppoe version
to 3.10 (which is now in building tree) and to remove missing library
(libresolv) - that is for unknown reason isn't present as separate
library and
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain.
Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should
successfully compile C applications and has working C++ compiler w/o c++
libraries (I planned to
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew:
31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain.
Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:05:01 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew:
31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain
Hi Erich;
are you aware of the Trac ticket#64?
I'm not using openswan in production, so I have no experience.
Maybe you can help to solve the pb.
thx kp
--
Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 12:40:12 schrieb Andrew:
31.10.2011 13:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 11:19:38 schrieb Andrew:
31.10.2011 12:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
Today I have enough free time
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011, 09:32:20 schrieb Andrew:
30.10.2011 00:12, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 29. Oktober 2011, 22:37:10 schrieb Andrew:
Hi all.
Today I have enough free time to spent it for LEAF toolchain.
Now I finished very basic rework on it, it looks like now it should
Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2011, 18:34:01 schrieb Mike Noyes:
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 08:10 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
Subject was: Re: [leaf-devel] Separate Git branch for 4.1-fixes ?
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 20:59 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
- snip -
Also the leaf-user list is quiet
Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011, 17:08:55 schrieb Andrew:
19.10.2011 17:38, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi Folks
at 19.10.2011 14:46, Andrew wrote:
Hi.
18.10.2011 21:41, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
On the other hand, I'm currently thinking about the idea to build a
later branch to testdrive
Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 10:38:08 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi kp,
Just wondering if we're planning to have a 4.1-fixes branch in Git
like we did for 4.0, with the changes for 4.1.1 going into there as well
as the master?
Hi David;
sorry for late reply, was away for three days...
I don't
Hi all;
Sorry for stepping in - I subscribed to this list only for this mail and
to express my disappointment about the current status of Kubuntu and kmail.
I previously tried to express my concerns on the feedback page after beta1,
but with no effect (other(s) did for later version in the
Hi Mike;
while trying to change the default milestone in trac admin I get:
IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'/nfs/trac/content/project/l/le/leaf/conf/trac.ini'
any hints?
kp
--
All the data continuously
Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2011, 04:18:18 schrieb Tim Wegner:
KP wrote:
Using a boot partition with 512MB solved issue - and 512MB on a CF
was about ten times the space I needed to install all packages,
thereforeI didn't investigate further.
Just for my education I reduced the main
Hi Gents;
today Bering-uClibc 4.1-rc1 has been uploaded to the FRS.
As expected the number of changes has shrunken.
tor, shorewall and wpa_supplicant has been updated to latest stable
upstream versions, etc.lrp has been fixed to start procps after the network
is up...
We've added an mdev
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 20:11:43 schrieb david M brooke:
Hi,
In case anyone is not aware, the Ohloh directory of Free and Open Source
Software (http://www.ohloh.net/) has an entry for the LEAF Project that
Mike created some time ago, see http://www.ohloh.net/p/leaf. One nice
be set up, by all
means, please do so. I'll subscribe to it as soon as it's set up.
Martin
Am 06.08.2011 22:28, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2011, 18:51:27 schrieb Mike Noyes:
Everyone,
I'll attempt to get the Git hook script working for a new
git-commits
Am Montag, 26. September 2011, 19:14:43 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Montag, 26. September 2011, 13:23:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Andrew
at 26.09.2011 11:43, Andrew wrote:
On 26/09/11 00:53, Erich Titl wrote:
HI Folks
This thing is driving me crazy
mega@luna:~/leaf/devel
Hi David;
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 19:05:58 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 18:11 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
I suggest that we freeze 4.1 for the rc1 and I'll try to accomplish
that task over the weekend.
OK with me.
David, there is one task open - license.lrp
Am Montag, 26. September 2011, 13:23:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Andrew
at 26.09.2011 11:43, Andrew wrote:
On 26/09/11 00:53, Erich Titl wrote:
HI Folks
This thing is driving me crazy
mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf/repo/dhcpd git pull
You are in the middle of a conflicted merge.
Am Sonntag, 18. September 2011, 13:38:27 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 11:42 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote:
Kernel was taken from kernel.org because kernel.org was one of
constantly-available resources and because kernel is enough
Am Samstag, 17. September 2011, 16:41:28 schrieb Andrew:
17.09.2011 16:43, davidMbrooke пишет:
Hi,
I'm trying to do a complete rebuild and build buildenv is
failing
almost right away. In log/buildtoollog I get:
buildtool::Download::download:file key:
Am Mittwoch, 14. September 2011, 09:03:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
I have recently been running a few time into an issue with
buildtool which probably bothers not only me.
from any average buildtool.mk
SMARTMON_DIR:=smartmontools-5.36
SMARTMON_TARGET_DIR:=$(BT_BUILD_DIR)/smartmon
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 00:18:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi folks
after my struggle with the wrong path I got to my next hurdle.
Has anyone successfully loaded the atheros wireless driver ath5k?
STYX# modprobe ath5k
modprobe: can't load module cfg80211
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 15:34:44 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
A follow up to my moddb woes. Trying to remove all unneeded maodules
from my moddb I wanted some kind of automatic removal
Here is a first attempt, use at your own risk...
cd /lib/modules
find -type f
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 00:14:37 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
trying to get my router to a moderately current version I downloaded
Bering-uClibc_4.0.1_i486_syslinux_ser.tar.gz for my WRAP based board and
got bitten in initrd here
[2.047660] Freeing unused kernel memory: 236k
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 19:43:04 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
Thanks to your heads up I got the system to a state where it loads
sufficient modules to be able to talk to it and access the hardware.
Still I have a few open issues
Loading modules:
[ 39.535904] nf_conntrack:
Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 22:59:21 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 06.09.2011 20:55, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Erich;
Pls try to load bitrev.ko before natsemi.ko.
LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0.1 Rev 1 uClibc 0.9.30.3 STYX ttyS0
STYX login: root
LEAF Bering-uClibc STYX 2.6.35.11-i486 #1
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 23:37:35 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 31.08.2011 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
...
I would like you to reconsider this decision.
I understand that modules.lrp is too big once a box is configured, but
pls be carefully removing
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 08:59:07 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
I am trying to reduce the footprint of the modules.lrp archive. I looked
at /lib/modules and found a completely unstructured module directory.
Is there a reason why we do that?
Up to version 3 it was filled
Hi Kwon;
thx for report and fix - just commited to git (and the one for leafcfg.cgit as
well).
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2011, 19:51:20 schrieb n22e113:
Hi, All, Leaf v4.0.1 v4.1-b1
By clicking |Configuration|,|System|, I received the following warning
just above the |Daemon Status| label:
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: Re: [leaf-user] Web Interface Issue
Datum: Donnerstag, 11. August 2011, 13:18:26
Von: Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch
An: n22e113 n22e...@yahoo.ca, Leaf-User (E-mail) leaf-
u...@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi
You are right there is no
Am Samstag, 6. August 2011, 13:45:22 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
I just tried to pull from git to retrieve a broken buildtool.mk, just to
find out that the structures in lwp have changed completely. Needless to
say that the work I did to clean this mess up is completely futile by
now and I
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2011, 18:51:27 schrieb Mike Noyes:
Everyone,
I'll attempt to get the Git hook script working for a new git-commits
mailing list in the next few days. After this new list is stable, I'll
close our cvs-commits list. Comments/suggestions?
Am Montag, 1. August 2011, 16:08:56 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 31.07.2011 00:31, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi;
An advantage of Bering-uClibc 4.0 over the 3.x versions is the
autodetection and autoloading of modules, and therefor the support of
much more appliances out-of-the box
Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2011, 04:41:19 schrieb n22e113:
Also loading module ext2 problem with Leaf 4.1-beta1 (from dmesg):
[ 13.552138] ext2: Unknown symbol mb_cache_create (err 0)
[ 13.571824] ext2: Unknown symbol mb_cache_shrink (err 0)
[ 13.590558] ext2: Unknown symbol
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 05:31:02 schrieb n22e113:
Hi,
Need to do multiple VPNs to head office from three different locations:
+--VPN---USA
Head_office---VPN---Canada
+--VPN---China
All sites will use PC Engines hardware and Leaf.
What's best solution? IPSec? OpenVPN? OpenSWAN?
The first beta version of Bering-uClibc 4.1 introduces a kernel update, updates
of various packages to new upstream versions, general improvements to support
more harwdare right from the start and, as usual, some few fixes for bugs found
in the latest version.
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 21:41:49 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
3.x) but help openvpn shows proper hints, how to start.
according to my own mail from 12 April this year it's in fact
help easyrsa
kp
--
Got Input
Hi;
An advantage of Bering-uClibc 4.0 over the 3.x versions is the autodetection
and autoloading of modules, and therefor the support of much more appliances
out-of-the box.
But that means also, that a lot of modules are installed without being of any
use - this raises boot time and wastes
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 22:49:24 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 27.07.2011 18:36, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 09:05:52 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
at 26.07.2011 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl
Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2011, 21:26:50 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 29.07.2011 18:25, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 22:49:24 schrieb Erich Titl:
...
and reapply. this should take care of the el/else issue
cheers
Erich
Done, but then I get
/bin/sh
Hi Erich;
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 08:16:29 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
at 26.07.2011 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
KP
at 25.07.2011 10:12, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011, 23:03
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2011, 09:05:52 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
at 26.07.2011 20:45, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
KP
...
The easiest way to get quick results is to report single findings here.
I have not been able
Hi Erich;
Am Montag, 25. Juli 2011, 16:13:08 schrieb Erich Titl:
KP
at 25.07.2011 10:12, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011, 23:03:23 schrieb Erich Titl:
HI KP
on 24.07.2011 01:39, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi all;
I think we've made enough steps
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 24. Juli 2011, 23:03:23 schrieb Erich Titl:
HI KP
on 24.07.2011 01:39, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi all;
I think we've made enough steps forward to 4.1 to build a first beta, but
I'm not shure if we do have showstoppers, which can be solved or has to
be moved
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011, 19:53:17 schrieb Martin Hejl:
Hi everybody,
it appears that the busybox version of inetd doesn't create a pidfile,
hence svi inetd stop doesn't work (and svi inted start doesn't
notice it's already running).
The attached patch seems to fix the issue for me
23.07.2011 20:21, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Samstag, 23. Juli 2011, 19:53:17 schrieb Martin Hejl:
Hi everybody,
it appears that the busybox version of inetd doesn't create a pidfile,
hence svi inetd stop doesn't work (and svi inted start doesn't
notice it's already running
Hi all;
I think we've made enough steps forward to 4.1 to build a first beta, but I'm
not shure if we do have showstoppers, which can be solved or has to be moved
to a later version.
David, do we need to wait for your work on isc-dhcp? I guess it can be done
later...
Andrew, I saw that you
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 21:15:10 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi,
I am looking at updating dhcpd.lrp to add the option of IPv6 (i.e.
DHCPv6 Server) support. Right now we build dhcp.lrp from ISC DHCP 2.0pl5
plus the -19.1 Debian patches, now more than 10 years old.
IPv6 support was added in the
Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2011, 20:07:27 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Hi;
net-snmp buildlog
mkdir -p /opt/buildtool-master/build/net-snmp/etc/snmp
make CC=/opt/buildtool-master/staging/bin/gcc-m32 LD=/opt/buildtool-
master/staging/usr/bin/ld -C net-snmp-5.4.3
make[1]: Entering directory
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2011, 21:55:39 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Erich;
a valid, although difficult question...
topic off
I am questioning a number of package decisions organically grown from
the past.
- dropbear vs. sshd suite (dropbear does not appear to support sftpd)
- dnsmasq vs. djbdns
Hi ERich;
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011, 00:54:52 schrieb Erich Titl:
KP
on 05.07.2011 20:07, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
For 4.1 the following open issues come to my mind:
- webconf 1.2 doubles traceroute and ping
I am aware of that, have not found the time to address it completely. I
would
that now this wrapper isn't
needed (this was implemented as workaround for cross-compilation in 3.x -
which has troubles with toolchain) and it can be replaced directly be
i486-pc-linux-gcc.
05.07.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi all;
I gave up with (k)ubuntu 11.04 and created
Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 07:53:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
at 27.06.2011 19:20, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 22:27:13 schrieb Andrew:
26.06.2011 22:59, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
configure:12114: /lib/cpp -DNO_ASM conftest.cpp
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gcc/i686-linux
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 22:27:13 schrieb Andrew:
26.06.2011 22:59, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
configure:12114: /lib/cpp -DNO_ASM conftest.cpp
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.5.2/cc1plus: error while
loading shared libraries: libc.so.0: cannot open shared object file
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 21:47:44 schrieb Andrew:
26.06.2011 01:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 00:05:05 schrieb Andrew:
26.06.2011 00:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 23:41:24 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am
Erich;
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 12:30:38 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 25.06.2011 10:25, davidMbrooke wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 20:31 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi;
just created the remote branch 4.0.1
One more question, in the trac system I see tickets for 4.01 4.1
Hi Erich;
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 12:23:53 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 24.06.2011 20:31, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi;
just created the remote branch 4.0.1
This branch is intended to work fixes for 4.0.1.
I've currently only
- updated webconf to fix Trac tickets #50, #51
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 12:39:47 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:23 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi KP
on 24.06.2011 20:31, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi;
just created the remote branch 4.0.1
This branch is intended to work fixes for 4.0.1.
I've currently only
HI David;
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:32:38 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:53 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Anyway I'd like test a bit further, so if David can just a a change, so
that I can see what happens
I will update the wiki once we have a stable layout
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 17:30:07 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 17:15 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
HI David;
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:32:38 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:53 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Anyway I'd like test a bit further, so
Hi David;
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 19:41:25 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 18:33 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi David
ok, done. 4.0.1 deleted, 4.0-fxies created.
Please adjust your local git. You may need to delete 4.0.1 locally and
add the tracking command for 4.0
Hi;
again a system update seems to break buildtool.
I've updated from ubuntu 10.04 to 11.04.
Trying to build buildenv fails:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/buildtool-
test/source/buildenv/uClibc-0.9.30.3'
make -j1 -C /opt/buildtool-test/source/buildenv/uClibc-0.9.30.3 \
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 20:44:03 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 21:34, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi;
again a system update seems to break buildtool.
I've updated from ubuntu 10.04 to 11.04.
Trying to build buildenv fails:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/buildtool-
test/source
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:12:20 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 21:49, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
initfini.c:29: Error: .size expression for _fini does not evaluate to a
constant
ok.
and now what?
:)
kp
--
All the data
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:31:16 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 22:26, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:12:20 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 21:49, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
initfini.c:29: Error: .size expression for _fini does not evaluate to a
constant
ok.
and now
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:57:35 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 22:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
I have installed binutils-2.21.0.20110327-2ubuntu3.
I still use 2.20 - and 3 days ago rebuild was successful. So trouble in
host binutils.
In our recent buildenv we do have binutils-2.21
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 23:41:24 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:57:35 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 22:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
I have installed binutils-2.21.0.20110327-2ubuntu3.
I still use 2.20 - and 3 days ago rebuild
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 00:05:05 schrieb Andrew:
26.06.2011 00:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 23:41:24 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 23:19, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 21:57:35 schrieb Andrew:
25.06.2011 22:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
I have
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, 22:05:56 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:25 +0300, Andrew wrote:
21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
git clone
ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 22:25:28 schrieb Erich Titl:
on 20.06.2011 21:22, Andrew wrote:
20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
...
I think that directories inside repos are actually unneeded. Branches
are IMHO enough good. And switching between them is easy (git checkout
branchname
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 01:38:59 schrieb Mike Noyes:
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 00:23 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi KP
on 19.06.2011 20:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
...
- the current leaf/leaf repository consists now only of the
buildtool, the environment (buildtool
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 21:22:06 schrieb Andrew:
20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Ok; Mikes proposal sounds reasoanble and I think a repository each leaf
project is a way to go.
In the repository we can one or more directories := different major
versions of a project
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:43:16 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 12:28, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 13:00, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi Andrew
on 18.06.2011 22:56, Andrew wrote:
...
IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the
main tree,
Andrew;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 13:16:35 schrieb Andrew:
19.06.2011 13:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
P.S
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 13:25:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 19.06.2011 12:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi Erich;
I agree, in theory it does look bad. But then, what are you're real
problems having binaries in git?
This is _inside_ the git tree
/home/mega
Hi Andrew;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 15:07:53 schrieb Andrew:
This is described on sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git
It requires shell access.
Done; see http://leaf.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi
If that looks ok for you, you can delete leaf/bin.
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 17:53:02 schrieb Andrew:
19.06.2011 18:01, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Hi Andrew;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 15:07:53 schrieb Andrew:
This is described on sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git
It requires shell access.
Done
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 18:29:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
...
...
Removing staging/i486-pc-linux-uclibc (and
Hi all;
as a summarize of the discussio of the last days:
- the binaries has been moved to a new repository as a compromise between
popular demand and the needs of the release dude - so they are not any longer
in the way of a nice build environment.
They are in leaf/packages repository (namely
Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for
source distribution/versioning...
IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least
Hi ERich;
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 00:43:06 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 15.06.2011 19:51, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 00:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
testing some of the webconf enabled tools I found that some paths have
changed, particularly
hello gents;
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
Hi,
We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0: one
request on leaf-user for asix.ko and I also got a direct request for
r8168.ko the other day. IMHO it
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
hello gents;
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
Hi,
We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0:
one
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches
that makes it seamless, I
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:25:13 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:29:34 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 23:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:32:55 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:29:34 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 23:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 21:59:49 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
Webconf right now is handled like any other package, but unfortunately
this is not the case as there is no monolithic webconf tarball on the
net which can just be fetched, configured and compiled (and is updated
at
Am Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, 00:21:12 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
testing some of the webconf enabled tools I found that some paths have
changed, particularly traceroute, which used to be a package on it's
own, now it appears to be a busybox applet. It used to be at /usr/sbin,
now it is at
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, um 14:44:16 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi,
I'm getting an error building haserl:
make -C haserl-0.9.25 all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/leaf/leaf/bering-uclibc4/buildtool/source/haserl/haserl-0.9.25'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, um 15:21:39 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:49 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, um 14:44:16 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi,
I'm getting an error building haserl:
make -C haserl-0.9.25 all
make[1]: Entering
Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, um 16:33:55 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 15:57 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi kp,
Sigh. No problem with radius for me...
Seems that radius decided not to build your LDAP integration module.
Did openldap build OK for you?
openldap
Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2011, um 21:01:34 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Hi;
I rebuild from scratch today and only bind package failed to build:
checking if unistd.h or sys/types.h defines fd_set... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for OpenSSL library... not found
Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2011, um 18:53:16 schrieb davidMbrooke:
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 22:09 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hello;
in the beginning the shorewall configuration files had an exhaustive
documentation including examples.
Later the documentation has been removed to improve
Hi;
I rebuild from scratch today and only bind package failed to build:
checking if unistd.h or sys/types.h defines fd_set... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for OpenSSL library... not found
configure: error: OpenSSL was not found in any of /usr /usr/local
Hello;
in the beginning the shorewall configuration files had an exhaustive
documentation including examples.
Later the documentation has been removed to improve support size-constrained
distros like LEAF, and was only available online or in the man-pages (which we
never added to our
Hi Tom;
Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2011, um 18:32:28 schrieb Tom Eastep:
2) Network developers have discovered an exploit that allows hosts to
poke holes in a firewall. The known ways to protect against the
exploit are:
a) rt_filter (Shorewall's routefilter). Only applicable to IPv4
601 - 700 of 1281 matches
Mail list logo
