Re: [BackupPC-users] Scheduling advice

ith only 7 days of backups. Unless you have a huge turnover in data, keeping more backups will not take a lot more space on the server. There is only one copy kept of each unique file, no matter how many backups you keep. And, since it is compressed it will take less space than the original copy. That

Re: [BackupPC-users] Scheduling advice

n and works backwards to clean up the old copies so you should have whatever files are still there even if some were somehow deleted. Still, if your pool filesystem is totally corrupted all bets are off - like it would be with any system. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com

Re: [BackupPC-users] Scheduling advice

you'll only lose the single day that you delete. > > And what If I don't have any other filled backup but only incrementals > made from the deleted "filled" ? "Filled" backups don't take a lot more space, just more time to build the directory structure. If you are

Re: [BackupPC-users] Scheduling advice

use you'd lose things that are pooled from other hosts. In any case, though, if the next (rsync) run does not find an existing copy it should fill it back in. Tar/smb backups would take a full run to recover since they only transfer new files by timestamp on incrementals. -- Les Mikesell

Re: [BackupPC-users] Scheduling advice

ion and pooling across host will likely at least double the history you can keep online unless your data is mostly unique and already compressed. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@ -- Check out the vibrant tech community

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up the BackupPC pool

ere you expect one to move most of the data so the 2nd one should go very fast and catch anything the 1st one missed. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on on

Re: [BackupPC-users] DumpPre/DumpPost scripting with $type incr

led by BackupPC. > If your database has a 'backup to stdout' command like mysqldump or pg_dump you can pipe though gzip to save the local copy which may save enough space to make it practical. And then you can exclude the uncompressed location from your backup to also save space on the server.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC_serverMesg has no effect?

rt on a host or two as I was leaving work on Fridays using the web interface so they would have the weekend to complete if necessary - and to correct any time-skew that might have happened. This was slightly before the blackout time would end so there would not be a problem with concurren

Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm

ecreate, unless you have already automated that with tuned kickstart files or all of your systems are identical. The ReaR tool I mentioned in another post will create a script to re-create an existing system. For Windows systems, I'd use Clonezilla images as the base, but that does take extra time and di

Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devsm

e boot isos until you might need to burn a copy. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! htt

Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devs

g it well for so long...). -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! htt

Re: [BackupPC-users] I'd like to make a suggestion to the BPC devs

le inactive branches. The easy way to get this facility is to do your work on a Mac. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sit

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up the server computer

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Bob Katz wrote: > > > It's a mess and I wish I could back out of it and start from scratch. > Also in the process I tried to create a xinet.d method of initiating > rsync and I fear a conflict. All I did was install xinetd and create > some

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up the server computer

op the daemon as the only > command I've found to stop the daemon incorporates the nonexistent PID > file. > > Any thoughts, please? Thanks! I noticed in your rsyncd.conf that you are running it as user backuppc. That probably will prevent it from accessing ports below 102

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up the server computer

ort (tcp/873?) to/from localhost in your firewall. But my opinion has always been that computers are supposed to do work so that humans don't have to, so I've always just run rsync over ssh to localhost just like everything else instead of doing the e

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up the server computer

running > > So I'm still stuck :-( Did you get any result from the "rsync localhost.localdomain::" test? If that doesn't connect, it is probably blocked by the firewall settings. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com

Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature request: Restore Search across all shares/backups

an option in the web interface would be great - and there it could even be aware of what host(s) the user is allowed to access. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's

Re: [BackupPC-users] How to backup a laptop over internet

he routing is only complicated if the endpoint is on a router or some other device. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

Re: [BackupPC-users] How to backup a laptop over internet

ething that will work with a dynamic DNS service. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! htt

Re: [BackupPC-users] Exchanging keys

gt; Normally the key goes in root's home directory under .ssh/authorized_keys. That 'ssh-copy-id' command is a shell script if you want to see what it does. Maybe you find wherever root's home directory is in the sandbox environment and make a copy there. If not, and you end up using rsyn

Re: [BackupPC-users] Recommend add to manual

selinux contexts are set correctly during the package install. Does that work through symlinks? Maybe you could make the symlink the other direction if you want to call it some other name. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 for Fedora / EPEL Update

ng life spans and updates? Seems safer than putting a same-named package in a different repo where a future update will probably accidentally pull in some other same-named package and clobber the one you wanted to keep.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.1 and NFS shares

he differences over the network). Is there any way you can run rsync remotely against the NFS host instead? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 for Fedora / EPEL Update

ny case, and I think the version of yum in RHEL/Centos 6 and up will handle URL's directly so you could shorten that to: yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-7.noarch.rpm -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ---

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 for Fedora / EPEL Update

yum --enablerepo=extras install epel-release.That is, the release package that installs the EPEL repo is available in the Centos extras repo which is part of the distribution. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Regarding "merges", am I correct?

stay current. > It might be even nicer to add the rpm-building script into the source repository so anyone could build an rpm of a new version and install without losing the file management features of rpm. -- Les

Re: [BackupPC-users] cannot "su - backuppc" after script

ent direct logins. You can still "su -s /bin/bash - backuppc" or "sudo su -s /bin/bash - backuppc" if that is the case. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ---

Re: [BackupPC-users] XferLOG.z is all trashed

; xterm > > Does anybody have a clue about that ? The remote system is sending some output before starting rsync over the ssh login.There is probably something being started in /etc/profile, /etc/bashrc or root's .profile or .bashrc that is complaining about not having TERM se

Re: [BackupPC-devel] BackupPC_Admin C wrapper and apache hell

C_Admin. >> >> Would it make more sense to put it in /usr/libexec? > > > I thought about that as well but in either case it doesn't solve the apache > directive issue... > Is it possible to use Apache's own

Re: [BackupPC-users] RPM for BackupPC 4

that reason. Are you planning to try to make one package that upgrades without breaking or a separate backuppc4 package so the admin can choose when/if to upgrade? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check

Re: [BackupPC-devel] IPv6 support?

long as v3 will be maintained and let the sysadmin decide when to switch. I might think differently if the upgrade could be completely transparent, though. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out th

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

> How can I correct this situation ? I'm not very good with the commands > who change the permissions. You can use chmod with the symbolic form for the permissions. chmod o+rx /path for each of the directories will add read and execute for every

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

Is it the file itself with incorrect permissions? Maybe everything is blocked by permissions on a directory above the one where your symlink points. Use 'ls -ld' on each starting with /media and make sure there is rx permission for everyone or at least backuppc. -- Les Mikesell lesmik

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Edith Cloutier <edith.clout...@mediom.com> wrote: > None > You'll have to explore why you can't su to the backuppc user and cd into that directory. "sudo su -s /bin/bash backuppc" should work or give you a hint about what is failin

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

th/Disque640Go > ext4 > Still looks reasonable - do you have any of the extended security mechanisms enabled? AppArmor or SeLinux? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

21 11:37 trash > That looks OK. What about "ls -ld /media/edith/Disque640Go/backuppc" for the directory itself? Also, what filesystem type is this? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

> What's the bug ? Where's it ? What does "ls -l /var/lib/backuppc" show? And if it shows a symlink, repeat for the target to see ownership and permissions. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ---

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

ted with > error code. See "systemctl status backuppc.service" and "journalctl -xe" for > details. > > What could I try next to solve the problem ? Try executing that symlink command that the log says is failing manually as the backuppc user. You might get

Re: [BackupPC-users] Looking for some comments on sizing.

and your ability to build an efficient raid/LVM volume of an appropriate size. But even if you need more than one server to handle it, the interface that lets you pick any file or directory from the history and either restore back to the source location or download through your browser is going to b

Re: [BackupPC-users] Looking for some comments on sizing.

that backups become faster after the 2nd full run. If you use the --checksum-seed option the rsync block checksums are cached on the server so the archive copy no longer has to be uncompressed for the rsync comparisons. -- Les Mikesell

Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to change the storage place

long time. > sudo mv /var/lib/backuppc /var/lib/backuppc_origine > sudo ln -s /media/edith/Disque640Go/backuppc /var/lib/backuppc > sudo chown -h backuppc:backuppc /var/lib/backuppc This should have been chown -r to recurse down the tree. --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Compression benchmark

the archived copy for the rsync comparison to work. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http:/

Re: [BackupPC-users] Problems using the wiki script

just the directories in /usr/local/BackupPC/lib/ which seem to at least exist, but your error is about a particular file. The @INC list is the search path where perl will try to find it. Does /usr/local/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC/Lib.pm exist, and if so is it and the pat

Re: [BackupPC-users] incremental forever - synthetic backup using ssh

great deal of difference bandwidth-wise between an incremental or full backup, although the full make take a much longer time to complete since it checks all the files. In either case, only the detected differences will be transferred.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC fails with aborted by signal=PIPE, Can't write to socket

what is that limit and how can I workaround or fix it? If that's > not possible, then BackupPC isn't the backup solution for me. The most likely suspect is that rsync timeout shown in the log snippet you posted. But you didn't provide any details about why or how your rsync had timeouts enabl

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC fails with aborted by signal=PIPE, Can't write to socket

Ms, one at a time. > > But isn't it much more interesting that I've seem to have found some > kind of limit to Backup PC? I think you have found some limit in your network or setup. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC fails with aborted by signal=PIPE, Can't write to socket

the backup is the same as the one being backed up.) > Because the read is taking so long, the write pipe has no activity and is > timing out. Pipes do not have any timeout. You mentioned that the backup is actually stored on a NAS device. Is this NFS mounted and

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC fails with aborted by signal=PIPE, Can't write to socket

g and the previous file: You probably won't see a cause on the backuppc side. Just the PIPE signal when the connection drops. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of th

Re: [BackupPC-users] Using --checksum instead of --ignore-times for full backup in BackupPC 3.3.1

reciated rather than criticizing my mail so strongly. I have been using > backuppc for 8 years, and it is what I recommend at the organizations that I > work for, but this kind of hostility would discourage people from adopting > it. Holger likes the details to be right. Often that tu

Re: [BackupPC-users] Second Destination

pression with the sshd configuration on the client side. However, it is only used with the rsync xfer method. Rsyncd and samba do not use the ssh layer. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- ___

Re: [BackupPC-users] Second Destination

onnections, but subsequent runs with rsync will be much faster, only copying the differences. If the initial full runs are impractical, it might work to initial set the 2nd server up locally, then move it to the offsite location with the initial data in pl

Re: [BackupPC-users] Second Destination

u don't need to do anything different from your remote server. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- ___ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sou

Re: [BackupPC-users] Preparing pool for migration

hat created the files. The chown that Adam suggests would fix it if that is the case. Also, I believe different packaged systems use different ways to make the web interface run as the backuppc user. You may need the perl-suid package

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup Running Forever

ppc side thinks the remote side disconnected. If rsync is actually still running on the client it is probably some sort of network issue like a nat gateway or stateful firewall timing out. If rsync did exit it could be out of memory or a filesystem or disk error. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Moving /var/lib/BackupPC to a new disk fails with rsync and OOM

while I OOM just kills it: Your best shot would be to use dd to copy the partition to the new disk, then grow the filesystem to fill the space using the filesystem tools. You don't need lvm for that since the space is already there, but the details of the command will depend on the type of filesystem. -

Re: [BackupPC-users] Choice of compression algorithm for logs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:45 AM, martin f krafft <madd...@madduck.net> wrote: > also sprach Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> [2016-08-06 18:19 +0200]: >> Why is it likely that you would want to read backuppc logs on >> systems that don't have backuppc installed. &

Re: [BackupPC-users] Choice of compression algorithm for logs

ly easy to write if you already know some computer language. The hard part comes when you try to understand someone else's code where they used a different style - or your

Re: [BackupPC-users] merge incrementals with full

n should not be copied at all with rsync/rsyncd, but would be by other methods using the timestamp to exclude existing files during incrementals. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- What NetFlow Analyzer can d

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC_trashClean (?) freezes system

it is hanging in the device driver code of the OS (perhaps waiting for a disk action to complete). But since it is a VM, I don't know how that really relates to the hardware. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backuppc appears to be ignoring home directories on full and incrementals

ined. Note that these can be overridden in the per-host configs, though. Normally you would change only the local host's per-host config to use sudo, leaving the others with the stock ssh command to work remotely.Also, note that the RsyncClientRestoreCmd command posted isn't symmetrical with

Re: [BackupPC-users] full backup of windows client succeeds, incremental fails

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chr...@real-time.com> wrote: > On 06/09 01:50 , Les Mikesell wrote: >> Sometimes this is caused by a nat router or stateful firewall >> (possibly even host firewall software) timing out and breaking a >> connectio

Re: [BackupPC-users] full backup of windows client succeeds, incremental fails

r ssh you can usually fix it by enabling keepalives - not sure about the standalone rsyncd options. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backup PC on SSL

- perhaps like this: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-create-a-ssl-certificate-on-apache-for-debian-8 -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network ban

Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection

nst allowing it to be linked into backuppc? That would be the equivalent, say, of gluing a proprietary database client into a perl module which is a better example of the need for dual-licensing. Or even if someone created a much better user interface and packaged it as a product - why would that be a pro

Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection

ut it is almost certainly too late to change anything with backuppc even if the copyright owner(s) wanted to. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Empl

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

ifferent operations done in parallel or sequenced across different machines. I never ran it against github but with its large user base and set of plugins I'd expect that to be a common setup. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

erations. It can be triggered by changes in your source control system and can collate results from different runs in one place for you. There are plugins for all sorts of build/test/publish scenarios if you need them. -- Les Mikes

Re: [BackupPC-users] Copyright protection

irement to transfer ownership of contributions to the official version so that someone would have the authority to change the license on future versions if desired - but it may already be too late for that. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

eat to automate tests across a few OS distributions and versions - especially tracking changes in the samba and rsync code. I'm retired now and no longer have access to lab resources or anything running backuppc so I can't do much but it is such a great project that I'd like to see it contin

Re: [BackupPC-users] Issues for future backuppc activities

butions, but it might do more harm than good to try to change that now - at least for v3. It does make it difficult to discuss issues on the mail list when different users will be seeing different things, though. --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

oogles-wireless-effort-is-led-by-a-geeks-geek-1421973826 http://www.recode.net/2016/4/14/11586114/access-google-fiber-ceo-interview He does have a linkedin page but I don't know if that would work any better to reach him. -- Les Mikesell lesmik

Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4

ernatives, and so far none >> of them make any economic sense to use. > > Doesn't BPC use whatever rsync version is available on the BPC-server? > v3 uses its own perl implementation to be able to compare to the compressed archived copy..

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.

to complete. The approximately-weekly timing for fulls will keep them on the same day after that. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applicatio

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.

> i believe an individual wakeup will only queue backups that are ready > to go, i.e. have their IncrPeriod or FullPeriod used up. In most cases > you need multiple wakeups. And, the first wakeup in the list starts the nightly cleanup which should happen at a time when the backup runs are expect

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.11.16

he defaults, it might be worth setting up a virtual machine with a stock install or figuring out how to extract the config file from the distribution .deb so you can diff yours against it to find all your local changes. -- Les Mikesell

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.11.16

shows space available? If it is in some other partition that is 95% full you would see the symptoms you describe. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.11.16

the ping command failing. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multipl

Re: [BackupPC-users] Random Daily Backups remain idle, can be started manually 4.11.16

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, tschmid4 <tschm...@utk.edu> wrote: > > Sporadic backups will run automatically. > Did you mean to ask a question?Does your log file show that scheduled backups are starting other times but failing? -- Les Mikesell lesmik

Re: [BackupPC-users] backupPC and NFS slow performance

a Friday evening so it - and the subsequent weekly fulls will have the weekend to complete, and unless you have a lot of changed files the weekday incrementals should be much faster. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] R: Re: R: Keep getting "Aborting backup up after signal PIPE"

ched drives, though. You might look through /var/log/messages for errors around the times backuppc runs have failed. The PIPE error doesn't tell you much except that the underlying xfer program quit unexpectedly. -- Les

Re: [BackupPC-users] R: Re: R: Keep getting "Aborting backup up after signal PIPE"

e backup drive itself is relatively new. Just a few > months old. > Are you sure you have enough RAM? Rsync will load a copy of the whole directory tree at both ends before starting. If your target is the same machine as the backup you'll need to hold 2 copies. -- Les Mikesel

Re: [BackupPC-users] A question about partial backups and fatal errors

me} ? > I think I'd try adding a top level directory at a time to $Conf{BackupFilesOnly}, starting with something small if possible. That should let you get an idea of what kind of speed you are getting before hitting whatever is causing your failures. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmai

Re: [BackupPC-users] A question about partial backups and fatal errors

ou might try adding one at a time and repeating the runs as they complete. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Da

Re: [BackupPC-users] Create normal user

host? Add them as a web user. The usual way is to add them to the htpasswd file but there are many ways to configure Apache authentication. Than add the appropriate logins in the user or moreUsers field of the hosts file to tie them to the host(s) they can control. -- Les Mikesell

Re: [BackupPC-users] Cannot start backuppc

u don't use the web interface for these tasks? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Ac

Re: [BackupPC-users] Cannot start backuppc

> Yes there is. If you add a new host with the web interface and use the newname=oldname syntax it will copy the old host's custom settings which you can then edit if it needs any changes. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Rebuilding a backuppc installation

base filesystem to ZFS, You don't have to rush into this. CentOS 6 is expected to be supported with maintenance updates until November 2020. And it doesn't use systemd and should work with your current linux filesystem. -- Les Mikesell lesmik

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-02-10 16:34 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>: >> If you want to keep more than one full shouldn't FullKeepCnt and maybe >> FullKeepMin be higher? &g

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-02-07 17:25 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>: >> How many filled backups are you configured to keep? And have you >> adjusted the FillCycle va

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

se them without conversions - but on the other hand there is difference between '6.97' and 7.97. If that isn't a typo, something odd happened. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Dee

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

ng that could lead to issue to backup removal. > And yet, other people who haven't made your changes don't see that issue. I don't know why it would happen but I wonder if your FullPeriod is somehow getting parsed as 2. --

Re: [BackupPC-users] Problem backup smb through DNS name

config that you have to manually change that entry. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at

Re: [BackupPC-users] Problem backup smb through DNS name

ed if it has been set and it is obviously necessary to manually change it to hit the right machine. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

ng double quotes instead of single around a string containing the @ symbol. The web editor should show you how perl parses the settings. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep V

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

kup is always filled and the older ones are changed to reverse deltas. It must move/copy things around to arrange that. And the full and incremental runs aren't tied to keeping filled/unfilled backups anymore. But, I still don't see why any expired already. --

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-01-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>: >> V4 does it backwards from v3. The last backup is always filled and >> the older ones are changed to re

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

r to "Unfilled" backups if you change the scheduling you may need to adjust the FillCycle setting. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-01-19 17:01 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>: >> I'd bump up FullKeepCntMin and IncrKeepCntMin to the numbers you want >> to see if that keeps them f

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Moisseev <mois...@mezonplus.ru> wrote: > On 18.01.16 19:53, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Does anyone understand the docs at >> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/BackupPC-4.0.0alpha3_doc.html >> for $Conf{FillCycle} ? It looks li

Re: [BackupPC-users] check backuppc file

works for rsync. Personally I would just start over and only worry about extracting anything from the old drive if you had to recover some older flle. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >