[asterisk-users] OBi202 configure as asterisk extensions

2017-04-11 Thread thelma
. In: ITSP Profile A DigitMap: (xx.|*xx.|#xx.) In: PHONE1 Port DigitMap: (xx.|*xx.|#xx.) When I call Line1 on OBi202 it rings but I can not make a call out neither local no outbound. -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

[asterisk-users] configure AudioCodes MP-112 with Asterisk.

2017-04-29 Thread thelma
is working OK. It seems to me Audiocodes MP-112 is trimming anything that is longer than 3-digits. -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum

Re: [asterisk-users] [SOLVED] configure AudioCodes MP-112 with Asterisk.

2017-04-29 Thread thelma
as set to 3 in: Configuration->VoIP->GW and IP to IP->DTMF and Supplementary ->DTMF & Dialing I don't know when did they change it to 3 as my MP-114 came with default 32-digits Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Col

Re: [asterisk-users] Call does not go to voicemail

2017-05-08 Thread thelma
sterisk server connected/registered over IAX and that error: "...exited non-zero on..." eg. -- SIP/54-0006 is ringing == Spawn extension (extensions, 4, 3) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/home_server-424' I'm not the only one with this problem, this guy has the same problem as me:

[asterisk-users] connecting two asterisks - transfer=no

2017-05-09 Thread thelma
n 'IAX2/home_server-424' Does it have something to do with "transfer=no" in iax.conf? -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk communit

[asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
Does asterisk listen on port 4569 by default? I'm running version Asterisk 11.25.1 and have a problem registering Zoiper (IAX) to Asterisk. I'm getting an error: Registration refused -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
I'm getting: netstat -a |grep 4569 udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* Should I be getting localhost IP? Thelma On 06/05/2017 06:48 AM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Does asterisk listen on port 4569 by default? > > I'm running version Asterisk 11.25.1 and have

[asterisk-users] Call does not go voicemail

2017-05-07 Thread thelma
k == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called SIP/54 -- SIP/54-0289 is ringing == Spawn extension (extensions, 4, 3) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/home_server-6364' -- Hungup 'IAX2/home_server-6364' Extension 4 is not BUSY (just nobody pickup the call) so why isn't call going to "Voicemail&

Re: [asterisk-users] Call does not go voicemail

2017-05-08 Thread thelma
transferred? Even when I put: exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${DIALSTATUS}"="BUSY"]?line2) exten => 4,n(line2),Dial(${FD_L2},20,trw) exten => 4,n(line2),Voicemail(4) The call (line2) would dial "FD_L2" but would not jump to next line "Voicemail" -- Thelm

Re: [asterisk-users] Call does not go to voicemail

2017-05-08 Thread thelma
;SIP/54,20,rw") in new stack == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called SIP/54 -- SIP/54-0307 is ringing == Spawn extension (extensions, 4, 3) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/home_server-435' -- Hungup 'IAX2/home_server-435' So FD_L1 (exten: 4) is ringing for 25sec.; nobody pickup the p

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
No, I don't think it is IP table issue, I've not upgraded dd-wrt for a while and it was zoiper was working OK with my previous version of asterisk. After upgrade to 11.25.1 it stop working. I'm sure port forwarding on dd-wrt is working OK as I have port 80 and 443 open. Thelma On 06/05/2017 07

Re: [asterisk-users] *****SPAM***** Re: IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
Doesn't matter how much I increase the verbose output asterisk -vvr asterisk will not even print a single line. How to find out if my firewall has this port open? https://www.grc.com is reporting that my port is 4569 is in Stealth mode (so it is closed) :-/ Thelma On 06/05/2017 02:19 PM

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
ength 40 14:20:45.357331 IP 192.168.141.7.4569 > 192.168.141.1.4569: UDP, length 65 14:20:45.376559 IP 192.168.141.1.4569 > 192.168.141.7.4569: UDP, length 53 14:20:45.376630 IP 192.168.141.7.4569 > 192.168.141.1.4569: UDP, length 12 ^C 12 packets captured 12 packets received by filter 0 packets

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX port 4569

2017-06-05 Thread thelma
yes it does. netstat -nap | grep 4569 udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:* 17375/asterisk Thelma On 06/05/2017 03:10 PM, Helvio Junior wrote: > Use the command bellow to check if is Asterisk opening the port. > > netstat -nap | grep 4569

Re: [asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
n sip.conf only: Found peer 'pstn-9998' for '7804715665' from 10.10.0.8:5060 Is perhaps the name effected by the special character "-" (dash) that is why it only matches "pstn" and take the first one it found. Will it make a difference if I rename the port to pstn_ in

Re: [asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
o asterisk reported as such. And I think asterisk suppose to lookup this label in sip.conf to the registered entry but instead selected pstn-9998 entry; I don't know why. If the call came IN on pstn- and sip.conf has two entries: [pstn-] [pstn-9998] Why it can not distinguish between the two of t

Re: [asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
Thelma On 02/15/2018 07:16 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 02/15/2018 04:49 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018, at 7:46 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks again for the hint. >>> Her

[asterisk-users] username mismatch

2018-02-16 Thread thelma
this one) disallow=all allow=gsm allow=ulaw allow=alaw nat=no context=incoming callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 qualify=yes -- Thelma -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Chec

Re: [asterisk-users] [SOLVED] username mismatch

2018-02-16 Thread thelma
69 ; just for audiocodes error complain > host=dynamic > insecure=port,invite > canreinvite=no ; (dtmf not working correctly without this one) > disallow=all > allow=gsm > allow=ulaw > allow=alaw > nat=no > context=incoming > callg

Re: [asterisk-users] [SOLVED] incoming call label

2018-02-16 Thread thelma
d I think asterisk suppose to lookup this label in sip.conf to the >> registered entry but instead selected pstn-9998 entry; I don't know why. >> >> If the call came IN on pstn- >> and sip.conf has two entries: >> [pstn-] >> [pstn-9998] >> >> Why i

[asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
hts up but asterisk is showing that the call is coming on "pstn-9998" -- Executing . Answer("SIP/pstn-9998 Asterisk should be showing "pstn-" (not pstn-9998) Where is this label coming from? -- Thelma -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
54 incoming No No Caller display ID from PSTN on FXO ports are working OK. The [pstn-] is channel: 4 The [pstn-9998] is channel: 3 If the call on Audocode is lighting UP "channel:3" the sip.conf should associate that call with [pstn-] (and no

Re: [asterisk-users] incoming call label

2018-02-15 Thread thelma
NAT) Sending to 10.10.0.8:5060 (no NAT) Using INVITE request as basis request - 7668022781522018162620@10.10.0.8 Found peer 'pstn-9998' for '7804715665' from 10.10.0.8:5060 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 Found RTP audio format 0 Found RTP audio format 8 Found RTP audio format 101 Found audio descriptio

[asterisk-users] upgrade asterisk 11 to 13 or 11-16

2020-12-06 Thread thelma
I'm planning to upgrade my asterisk-11.25 to ver. 13 or should I go to 11 to 16 Is there any official documentation how to upgrade, what to watch for during upgrade? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] upgrade asterisk 11 to 13 or 11-16

2020-12-06 Thread thelma
On 12/06/2020 01:44 PM, Jöran Vinzens wrote: > Hi, > > I did a talk on Astricon 2019 on this topic. Unfortunately there are no > videos of that year but you can find my slides here covering some pitfalls. > https://www.slideshare.net/JranVinzens/asterisk-11to16-what-could-go-wrong > > Good luck

Re: [asterisk-users] upgrade asterisk 11 to 13 or 11-16

2020-12-07 Thread thelma
Sound reasonable. I know it take time to debug the dial-plan after upgrade. Can I use sipp, from command line to call my local asterisk specific extension and to observe in another terminal via "asterisk -vvr" what it is doing? On 12/07/2020 11:50 AM, Eric Wieling wrote: > Read UPGRADE.TXT

Re: [asterisk-users] upgrade asterisk 11 to 13 or 11-16

2020-12-07 Thread thelma
On 12/07/2020 05:06 AM, Jöran Vinzens wrote: > Hi, > > I guess describing how SIPp works here on a mailliste might be too much. > But if you do not want to prove your setup automatically, you do not need > to know SIPp. > > But there was a talk in 2014 Astricon giving an overview about SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk Unknown DYNAMIC_FEATURES item 'automon' on channel

2020-12-23 Thread thelma
On 12/23/2020 09:54 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: > Review your features.conf file in /etc/asterisk > > Doug I found id. Thanks. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk

[asterisk-users] asterisk Unknown DYNAMIC_FEATURES item 'automon' on channel

2020-12-23 Thread thelma
I just upgraded to asterisk-13 (from 11) and I get some errors: 1.) Unknown DYNAMIC_FEATURES item 'automon' on channel SIP Unknown DYNAMIC_FEATURES item 'automon' on channel IAX2/voip Does anybody know how to get rid of them? --

[asterisk-users] db_execute_sql: Error executing SQL (COMMIT): database is locked

2020-12-23 Thread thelma
In: /var/lib/asterisk -rw-r--r-- 1 asterisk asterisk 12288 Dec 23 10:52 astdb.sqlite3 ast_db_put: Couldn't execute statement: SQL logic error ast_db_put: Couldn't execute statement: attempt to write a readonly database db_execute_sql: Error executing SQL (COMMIT): database is locked The

[asterisk-users] asterisk 13 takes over an hour to clear the MWI light

2020-12-24 Thread thelma
In astersik-11 MWI light was cleared as soon as I checked the message. In asterink-13 it takes about 20min to set the light ON and the light takes over an hour to clear. What had changed? In sip.cong [400] ... mailbox=400 voicemail.conf [default] 400 => ,user, email --

[asterisk-users] asterisk-13 MWI - phone not blinking

2020-12-23 Thread thelma
On asterisk-11 MWI was working correctly, phone message light was blinking (standard phone). With asterisk-13, this feature is not working. Who to trouble shoot? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 13 takes over an hour to clear the MWI light

2020-12-24 Thread thelma
I just tired/upgraded to asterisk-16.13.0 and the problem still persist. Looking at some post on digium.support web-page, they don't have a clear solution or know what causing it. On 12/24/2020 05:03 AM, Julian Beach wrote: > Hello Thelma, > > Thursday, December 24, 2020, 9:26:53 AM, t

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium or Sangoma? What happened to Digium cards

2021-01-13 Thread thelma
I'm disappointed with Sangoma! I have one of those Digium S101i (iaxy) adapters that is still working (in production), doesn't need any drivers. After, I purchased Sangoma USBfxo (U100) adapter, never had a chance to use it (still brand new in a box) that require some extra driver to run it,

Re: [asterisk-users] ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available.

2021-01-04 Thread thelma
On 1/4/21 10:09 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: app.c:280 ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available. > > Macros are no longer built by default in Asterisk 16. This was documented in > the UPGRADE.txt file > > app_macro: > - The app_macro module is now

Re: [asterisk-users] ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available.

2021-01-04 Thread thelma
On 1/4/21 9:04 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:57 AM wrote: > >> Did execution of macro changed in Astersik-16.15 ? >> >> When I try to dial an extension that call macro I get an error: >> >> app.c:280 ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is >> not

[asterisk-users] ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available.

2021-01-04 Thread thelma
Did execution of macro changed in Astersik-16.15 ? When I try to dial an extension that call macro I get an error: app.c:280 ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available. Dial(SIP/718xx@pstn-5665,20,m(default)M(atb)) -- Thelma

Re: [asterisk-users] ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available.

2021-01-04 Thread thelma
On 1/4/21 12:01 PM, Doug Lytle wrote: Gosub(check-number-forwarding,Dial(SIP/718xxpstn-5665,20,U(atb-sub)) > Is ARG1 = atb-sub ? > > No. > > My complete line > > exten => _45XX,1,Set(_ARG1=${EXTEN} > same => n,Gosub(check-number-forwarding,s,1(${ARG1})) > > So, if

Re: [asterisk-users] ast_app_exec_macro: Cannot run 'Macro(atb)'. The application is not available.

2021-01-04 Thread thelma
On 1/4/21 10:44 AM, Doug Lytle wrote: > How do you enable the phone speaker on the Gosub? > I had: Dial(SIP/718x@pstn-5665,20,m(default)M(atb)) > > You can provide variables to your gosub routine, for an example > > Gosub(check-number-forwarding,s,1(${ARG1})) > > Doug

[asterisk-users] chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response

2024-01-02 Thread thelma
I'm using asterisk-16.30.1 When I try to call another asterisk server over IAX I get a busy signal, chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response -- IAX2/192.168.143.1:4569-656 is circuit-busy Asterisk-16.16 is working normally, no congestion error. -- Thelma

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response

2024-01-02 Thread thelma
On 1/2/24 15:13, aster...@phreaknet.org wrote: On 1/2/2024 4:03 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm using asterisk-16.30.1 When I try to call another asterisk server over IAX I get a busy signal, chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response     --

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow response

2024-01-03 Thread thelma
On 1/3/24 04:53, Henning Follmann wrote: On Jan 2, 2024, at 23:17, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 1/2/24 15:13, aster...@phreaknet.org wrote: On 1/2/2024 4:03 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm using asterisk-16.30.1 When I try to call another asterisk server over IAX I get a busy