http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/newmedia/technical/
browser_support.shtml
Unless I'm mis-reading it, is the platform labels for Safari
wrong in table 3.1? And Konquerer, Opera and the second IE (Mac
IE?) look a bit dubious as well.
Yup - it looks like a tdAll/td is missing for either
At 13:56 + 10/12/06, Tom Loosemore wrote:
Does anyone know if the BBC releases statistics such as browser
version/type, screen resolution and so on?
Allan
Hi Alan
From home I can only get headline browser numbers - will do more
digging next week to try and get at the rest. The percentages
Hello all,
Thanks for the multitude of replies about web-site statistics. The
sources people pointed out are very interesting, particularly the
table of what browsers the bbc test on and support. It would be
absolutely excellent if a break down of the bbc statistics was to be
made
Tom: Many thanks for the browser breakdown for November.
Interesting that Cable receives also has high a percentage of
Safari. I suppose the up-shot is that if you make the
decision on which platforms to support from that statistic,
if you include Safari, Cable should be there as well.
Of Andrew Bowden
Sent: 11 December 2006 14:43
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Site statistics
Tom: Many thanks for the browser breakdown for November.
Interesting that Cable receives also has high a percentage of Safari.
I suppose the up-shot is that if you make
On 11/12/06, Allan Jardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Thanks for the multitude of replies about web-site statistics. The
sources people pointed out are very interesting, particularly the
table of what browsers the bbc test on and support.
copypaste from a man who'd know...
We are
They, the BBC could always use Google Analytics, only takes a few minutes to
set up, its free and the results can be fairly detailed. :)
I've said it before, but I'll say it again, how the site is used, in terms
of text searches, navigation paths - through the site -most popular
pages/videos,
Internally, there exists very details stats on this sort of thing, but I
have absolutely no idea if it's allowed to be published externally!
Daniel Morris | Web Developer
BBC Entertainment : Manchester : New Media
int. 01 44217
ext.
December 2006 13:23
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Site statistics
They, the BBC could always use Google Analytics, only takes a
few minutes to set up, its free and the results can be fairly detailed.
:)
I've said
free. Must have shaken up the market a fair
bit.
J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Plowright
Sent: 08 December 2006 13:58
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Site statistics
FEES AND SERVICES . Subject
On 08/12/06, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that Martin Belam has done a little work
on this ( http://www.currybet.net/articles/user_agents/index.php )
but these results are now a year out of date.
Yes, my new report about visitors to Sony's CONNECT store doesn't make
such
please take us off your email list
- Original Message -
From: Richard Hyett
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [backstage] Site statistics
They, the BBC could always use Google Analytics, only takes a few minutes to
set up
please take us off your email list
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [backstage] Site statistics
Internally, there exists very details stats on this sort of thing, but I
have
13 matches
Mail list logo
