Hi!
What is the current development status for the BCM4322 chip? Is it working
in the meantime?
If not, I can also try to hack the b43 driver for supporting it, at least
if I get the necessary informations.
CU
Christian
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Christian Schoenebeck
c...@users.sf.net wrote:
Hi!
What is the current development status for the BCM4322 chip? Is it working
in the meantime?
If not, I can also try to hack the b43 driver for supporting it, at least
if I get the necessary informations.
CU
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Hi!
What is the current development status for the BCM4322 chip? Is it working
in the meantime?
If not, I can also try to hack the b43 driver for supporting it, at least
if I get the necessary informations.
If I remember correctly, the 4322 has an N PHY. If
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
some tests for AP mode? Or is this /stupid/ idea without calibration
done?
Stefanik
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Stefanik is there change you find some time to finish calibration
part before .32 merge window? Don't want to rush you, you already
have done great work, just would like to know.
Developers can (and they should) react very badly to questions like
this. Many times I do, I
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
some tests
2009/9/17 Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or
