2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
what is current LP PHY status?
Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is
probably not on par with wl_hybrid or ndiswrapper.
--
Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
what is current LP PHY status?
Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is
probably not on par with wl_hybrid or ndiswrapper.
i
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
what is current LP PHY status?
Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com:
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com:
what is current LP PHY status?
Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is
probably not on par with wl_hybrid
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
some tests for AP mode? Or is this /stupid/ idea without calibration
done?
Stefanik
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Stefanik is there change you find some time to finish calibration
part before .32 merge window? Don't want to rush you, you already
have done great work, just would like to know.
Developers can (and they should) react very badly to questions like
this. Many times I do, I
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make
some tests
2009/9/17 Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki:
Hi,
I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain
to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this
just calibration for performance