Re: b43 LP PHY status

2009-09-29 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: what is current LP PHY status? Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is probably not on par with wl_hybrid or ndiswrapper. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware

Re: b43 LP PHY status

2009-09-29 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: what is current LP PHY status? Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is probably not on par with wl_hybrid or ndiswrapper. i

Re: b43 LP PHY status

2009-09-29 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: what is current LP PHY status? Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though

Re: b43 LP PHY status

2009-09-29 Thread Larry Finger
Gábor Stefanik wrote: 2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Gábor Stefanik netrolller...@gmail.com: 2009/9/29 Ed Spiridonov edo@gmail.com: what is current LP PHY status? Working in 2.6.32-rc1, though no calibration yet; so performance is probably not on par with wl_hybrid

LP-PHY status?

2009-09-17 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Hi, I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make some tests for AP mode? Or is this /stupid/ idea without calibration done? Stefanik

Re: LP-PHY status?

2009-09-17 Thread Peter Stuge
Rafał Miłecki wrote: Stefanik is there change you find some time to finish calibration part before .32 merge window? Don't want to rush you, you already have done great work, just would like to know. Developers can (and they should) react very badly to questions like this. Many times I do, I

Re: LP-PHY status?

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Ilnseher
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki: Hi, I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this just calibration for performance, or something more? Did someone make some tests

Re: LP-PHY status?

2009-09-17 Thread Gábor Stefanik
2009/9/17 Thomas Ilnseher il...@gmx.de: Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Rafał Miłecki: Hi, I would like to ask about status of LP-PHY status. Could you explain to simple end-user what is missing in current implementation? Is this just calibration for performance