Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum update
gives me a package conflict on perl:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686
]
crashes
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2
file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:53:16 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:22 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 20:27 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
snip
Is there a way to say: Hey RPM, have
Hello,
what is with syslog in 5.2 , i have heard that 5.2 should contain new
version of syslog which will support regex for custom logs and so ...
D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:49 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Michael A. Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Well, as you gradually update packages, if you update everything, you
will be on 5.2. If you only update a few packages that you feel are
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
5.1 is not a different distro than 5.2. If you update 5.1 it becomes
5.2. You don't go out and say update to 5.2, you just yum update, and
it becomes 5.2.
Think of it in Windows terms as Centos 5 sp1 (service pack 1) or Centos
5 sp2.
If you want
Scott Silva wrote:
If you want something from an Offical CentOS rep, then read
http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=34
but it is a little dated since it only refers to Centos 3 and 4.
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-6e2c3746ec45ac3142917466760321e868f43c0e
also covers
Tim Nelson wrote:
Please please please make an announcement when it is ready for
testing!!! I'm more than happy to install and test til I'm blue in the
face!!!
As said: Step forward, talk to Johnny. Don't be passive and wait for
something to happen. Make it happen!
Ralph
pgperHyPCkico.pgp
John R Pierce wrote:
I thought the 'updates' directory contained updates for everything from
5.0 forward ?
No.
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Ralph
pgpd491Q36bqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 23:53 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
snip
LM I'd be concerned about the initial filesystem error perhaps
LM being hardware related. You might try a 'cat /dev/sda
LM /dev/null' to force a full disk read, then 'smartctl -a
LM /dev/sda' to see if the
WARNING! Due to my background, I don't often read man pages like I used
to. So there may be some inaccuracies or ambiguities below.
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:58 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
snip
Sorry. Stupid question again: and if I find inconsistencies, then the
Keep in mind that *some*
Ned Slider wrote:
Dunc wrote:
Hi
Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same.
But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with
[::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times,
and eventually changing the original to [*] allowed me
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I thought the 'updates' directory contained updates for everything from
5.0 forward ?
No.
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Right ... BUT, base + updates are all the latest
Dunc wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Dunc wrote:
Hi
Yes it was written as rpmnew, and indeed the default was the same.
But using the original I was using before, changing nothing, with
[::] I could not connect after the upgrade. I restarted many times,
and eventually changing the original to [*]
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:51:35 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM WARNING! Due to my background, I don't often read man pages
WLM like I used to. So there may be some inaccuracies or
WLM ambiguities below.
WLM On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:58 +0200, Bernhard
Ned Slider wrote:
As this seems to affect the default install configuration we presumably
need to add a note somewhere to reflect this. Thanks for spotting and
reporting it.
Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it?
There are some of us, who really use IPv6 in real life :D
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I thought the 'updates' directory contained updates for everything
from 5.0 forward ?
No.
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Right ... BUT, base +
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
updates/ gets emptied out on a new point release and then is rebased on
the os/ tree for the new release.
Right ... BUT, base + updates are all the latest RPMS in the release,
so no one should think that is a problem.
So how can you do an install based on all the
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
Hi there!
I have recently migrated my old server from OpenSUSE 10.0 to CentOS 5.
Almost everything works great, except for one thing - user passwords.
In the old system they were in a form:
root:$2a$05$9V.P3/KV2fd0r/O8hs0gNueaidF35edj3DL6skb32qZJNpvwVHiUO:12183:0:9:7:::
and that format
Karanbir Singh scribbled on Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:31 PM:
Ned Slider wrote:
As this seems to affect the default install configuration we presumably
need to add a note somewhere to reflect this. Thanks for spotting and
reporting it.
Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else experienced this or can confirm it?
There are some of us, who really use IPv6 in real life :D
Somebody's actually using IPv6? One comes to think of flying pigs for some
reason... ;-)
umm. bacon..
- KB
Hi,
I'm using Centos 2.4.21-37.ELsmp.
Under root user I can erase and burn a CDRW with succes.
But under normal user it's impossible and the following error message appeared
this is on the same machine.
Any help ?
Under normal user: Error !
--
/usr/bin/cdrecord -v
This is my first major version update after using a local repo.
It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new
5.2 base? Is this correct?
When I run yum update it now fails with various strange dependency errors
although all the updates are synced. When I change to using
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:58:59PM +0200, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
Hi,
Hi Rachid,
Gentle quidelines reminder:
- don't hijack threads, create a new one.
I'm using Centos 2.4.21-37.ELsmp.
Under CentOS 3, you should be running 2.4.21-57.ELsmp...
Under root user I can erase and burn a CDRW with
Centos 4.x with out any non centos rpms, is it possible to limit the bandwith of
a virtual host in apache?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is my first major version update after using a local repo.
It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new
5.2 base? Is this correct?
You can build your base repo from the iso images via Nautilus. Right
click on the iso image file and open
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is my first major version update after using a local repo.
It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new
5.2 base? Is this correct?
When I run yum update it now fails with various strange dependency errors
although all the updates are synced.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This is my first major version update after using a local repo.
It seems that before I can yum update I have to fetch the complete new
5.2 base? Is this correct?
Yes. updates/ is rebased on the current os/ repo.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpAItBXeYxo4.pgp
Description: PGP
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel panic.
Something about powernowk8. I could boot up with the old kernel, though.
I know I have to put in a bug report on this, will do shortly, but first
wanted to try a fresh
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel panic.
Something about powernowk8. I could boot up with the old kernel, though.
Read the Release Notes.
I know I have to put in a bug report on this,
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel panic.
Something about powernowk8. I could boot up with the old kernel, though.
Read the Release Notes.
Now I have to
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:37:32 -0400:
You can build your base repo from the iso images via Nautilus.
Well, I don't have the iso here ;-) I install via http from local repos since
5.1 came out. But I didn't sync base since then as it wasn't necessary
(nothing's going to
I'm having a bit of a problem with what I can see over nfs.
I have two machines that nfs their root to each other and it seems to
work. However, I now found out that some of the root directories that are
listed are fake ones. A comparison of the root on both machines shows
that some directories
admin wrote:
the CentOS DirServer has been in the
testing repo for a bit, and the same with
cobbler/koan/func/smolt/maatkit etc.
Is the testing repo publicly accessible? If so, where?
Sorry if that's a stupid question, but I can't find it on
mirror.centos.org or searching the website for
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
After it loaded the kernel, it died with the same Kernel panic. This is
bad. Very bad. If they fix the kernel (when, please?), I will need to
make a new install CD (how?).
you can run the 5.1 installer, with extra repo's for 5.2's base repo.
This
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:24 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine
I'm having a bit of a problem with what I can see over nfs.
hi,
i try use iptables connlimit,
# iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16
--connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP
iptables: Unknown error 4294967295
where is problem ?
thanks
# rpm -qa | grep iptables
iptables-1.3.5-4.el5
# uname -a
Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP
Keep me Posted on what happens please.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bernhard Gschaider
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:55 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS
5.2
Hansjörg Maurer wrote:
Hi
we have often seen this behaviour with lvm and RHEL5 too
We try to use fixed sizes during installation and extend the lvm, when
the system is running.
I think, that the calculation of lvm size and PE size in the installer
is not working well
I redid it, and made
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
you can run the 5.1 installer, with extra repo's for 5.2's base repo.
This is interesting
Where do I specify the 5.2 base repo http url?
This is where I tell you to run the GUI installed, and add the url at
the 'most appropriate place', like when it asks you if
Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:42:40 -0400:
This option is based on the option of the same name provided in IRIX NFS.
Normally, if a server exports two filesystems one of which is mounted on the
other, then the client will have to mount both filesystems explicitly to get
access to
we have ORACLE 10.2.0.4 with CENTOS 4.4 on DELL server. Recently we are test
UTL_SMTP on ORACLE PL?SQL program and tried to send MAIL to customers.
The problem is this send MAIL program always one time work and second time not
work (loop). I don't think problem come from ORACLE bug or any
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel panic.
Something about powernowk8. I could boot up with the old
snip
All this leads me to the conclusion that there are only some selected
packages corrupt (and I don't want to reinstall the machine). Would
Installing/Repairing from DVD help?
If you have packages newer than what is on the dvd, I don't think they will
get replaced. You might get away with
I am using 32bit base kernel and want to increase the number of serial ports
from 4 to 6. The hardware is a touch screen epos system and it uses com
ports 5 and 6 for dedicated devices.
I think that I may need a customer kernel. Are there any instructions on
how to do this or other ways of
mcclnx mcc wrote:
The problem is this send MAIL program always one time work and second time
not work (loop). I don't think problem come from ORACLE bug or any ORACLE
relate problem. If I copy database and put on anyother server, it work
correctly.
Â
Does anyone have suggestion?
Seems
The documentation for 5.2 indicates the glock_purge tunable parameter is
present for GFS in its example output from `gfs_tool gettune`. However, I just
upgraded a 5.1 system to 5.2 and everything looks good except for the
mysterious absence of the glock_purge parameter. Any ideas as to why this
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
update gives me a package conflict on perl:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:35 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine
Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:42:40 -0400:
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:24:23 +0200:
Once my base sync is finished I'm gonna clean again and then
try the update again.
Dependency resolution works now, but I hold with upgrading until I get
some feedback from people who updated (hopefully) fine with Xen 3.2
installed.
Hi,
I am actually looking for nagios-nrpe-2.8.1 version for CentOS release 5
(Final) rpm. I have looked in rpmforge. Not able to find it
Any help would be really appreciated
Thanks and Regards
Kaushal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
| I am actually looking for nagios-nrpe-2.8.1 version for CentOS release 5
| (Final) rpm. I have looked in rpmforge. Not able to find it
That's because the most current version that is spun up on rpmforge is:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
you can run the 5.1 installer, with extra repo's for 5.2's base repo.
This is interesting
Where do I specify the 5.2 base repo http url?
This is where I tell you to run the GUI installed, and add the url at
the 'most appropriate place',
Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:16:51 -0400:
This is what I did.
Ok, I finally got it right.
- you have to *export* all filesystems that should be usable (not just /)
- you have to nohide each single one of them
then you can mount hostname:/ and get all the other remote mount points
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel
panic. Something about powernowk8. I could boot
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Max Hetrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
| I am actually looking for nagios-nrpe-2.8.1 version for CentOS release 5
| (Final) rpm. I have looked in rpmforge. Not able to find it
That's
Dear All,
I am curently running a CENTOS server with the following setup
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on an i686
bind-9.3.3-10.el5
sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5
apache httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3
MailScanner ver 4.66.5
ClamAV 0.92
SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
SquirrelMail ver
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum update
gives me a package conflict on perl:
...
Using a x86_64 install btw.
Anyone seen this one??
Please don't hijack threads with a Reply when starting
Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum
update gives me a package conflict on perl:
...
Using a x86_64 install btw.
Anyone seen this one??
Please don't hijack threads with a
fabian dacunha wrote:
i jus wanted to know if i could SAFELY apply the updates since its a live
server running our companys primary DNS and mail server
noone has your exact configuration, so the only way to know if it will
for sure work for you would be to test it on a staging server
mcclnx mcc wrote:
I did NOT see anything wrong on /var/log/maillog.
Can you telnet to localhost 25 and send a mail that way ?
e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 portal.aphroland.org ESMTP Postfix
Why don't you clone your machine, or use Vmware or something, and do an test
before you do it with your production-machine? Asking this sort of question is,
well, rather meaningless IMO. Your setup is unique considering what tweaks you
might've done to it. YMMV as they say. What works for me,
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:35 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
fabian dacunha wrote:
i jus wanted to know if i could SAFELY apply the updates since its a live
server running our companys primary DNS and mail server
In case you missed it, there was a recommended two step and parameter
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:46 +0300, fabian dacunha wrote:
Dear All,
I am curently running a CENTOS server with the following setup
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on an i686
Stating the obvious, you are WAY behind on updates, including many
security patches.
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Thus if were to try and mix 5.1 with 5.2, I HAVE to start the install
with the 5.1 10f6 CD. Then I either point to the 5.2 local repo URL or
point to the 5.1 local repo URL and then supply the 5.2 repo as 'extra'.
I suspect the former will fail as it will install the 5.2
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:39:06 -0400:
Any idea on what the real error is, how to find out more, what to try
next? It did take me a bit to walk through the packet selection.
Anaconda doesn't have good error handling, so it likes to bomb out when
doing complex custom
William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400:
2. yum upgrade # not update
that's supposed to be the same.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400:
2. yum upgrade # not update
that's supposed to be the same.
IIRC, that's true if default config file wasn't modified with certain
parameters. Do I mis-remember? IIRC,
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:25:42 -0400
J == John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J Keep me Posted on what happens please. John
You mean whether the nvidia-x11-drv package works inter-5.2 during
kernel-updates? Today a new kernel-update arrived and two of my
machines recompiled the driver without
Hi all,
I would like to set up a local CentOS mirror, as suggested by others
on this list, to cut down on bandwidth usage, etc. I have read a
couple HowTos and it seems pretty straight-forward, but I do have some
questions.
1) How should I change my entries in /etc/yum.repos.d? Specifically,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:53 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] nfs cannot see mount points on other machine
Jason Pyeron wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:16:51 -0400:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Art Age Software
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:03 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Starting a Local CentOS Mirror
Hi all,
I would like to set up a local CentOS mirror, as suggested
I just updated from an i386 CentOS 5 system today, using the reccommendeds
steps on my server, and it went fine.
So it *should* also go fine for you, but, as has been said before, Your
Mileage May Vary.
2008/6/26 William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:31 +0200, Kai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mirrors]# cat centos.sh
#!/bin/bash
lockfile=$0.lck
unset interactive
unset verbose
interval=20 hours
verbose=-q
while [ $1 != ]
do case $1 in
--bwlimit=*)
limit=--bwlimit=64
;;
--interactive)
interactive=true
Hmmm,
I seemed to have created a misalignmnet somewhere along the line. I
can't remember doing anything to this. But at one time I did try to test
the java open source. Posted my results to the list, got no response,
abandoned all hope and went on my merry way. I don't know if this is
related.
I
mcclnx mcc wrote:
UNIX mail on this server work correctly. I also tried the way you suggest
3 times and it also work correctly.
I guess the next question is how exactly is Oracle sending the
mail? I've run Oracle 10g on several RHEL systems, but when I did
email it was always using shell
on 6-26-2008 10:54 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the
on 6-26-2008 3:09 PM Michael Holmes spake the following:
I just updated from an i386 CentOS 5 system today, using the
reccommendeds steps on my server, and it went fine.
So it *should* also go fine for you, but, as has been said before, Your
Mileage May Vary.
Even though there have been
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ]
crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03,
CPU1 the same).
I get kernel panic at
Greetings. I'm looking for recommendations for a PCI Express ethernet
card that works with Centos5. Kernel is:
Linux mgw1.topix.net 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5PAE #1 SMP Fri Nov 30 01:21:20 EST
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Milt Mallory
Topix.com
650-461-8316
Always consider the issues of
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Papalagi Pakeha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I have recently migrated my old server from OpenSUSE 10.0 to CentOS 5.
Almost everything works great, except for one thing - user passwords.
In the old system they were in a form:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 at 8:10pm, Milt Mallory wrote
Greetings. I'm looking for recommendations for a PCI Express ethernet
card that works with Centos5. Kernel is:
Linux mgw1.topix.net 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5PAE #1 SMP Fri Nov 30 01:21:20 EST
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
1) Upgrade. That kernel is
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot
process on Compaq ProLiant 3000
with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai)
stepping 03, CPU1 the same).
I get kernel
Hi,
I've just installed CentOS 5.2, but could not find a workplaces (which
I can switch between them) icon in the panel. I am running in GNOME
(it was desktops in KDE). I've looked at References and
Administration, but could not find the workplaces to add to the panel.
Where can I find it and how
Sorry, I found it, please ignore following message.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 AM, hce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just installed CentOS 5.2, but could not find a workplaces (which
I can switch between them) icon in the panel. I am running in GNOME
(it was desktops in KDE). I've
Uuups
About the error using virt-install i mistyped the parameter for the
dom0-min-mem,now i can install using virt-install, but the new button of the
virt-manager tool is still disabled.
Thank you.
--- El jue 26-jun-08, Ramon Nieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
De:: Ramon Nieto [EMAIL
Hi,
I opened a Firefox on Desktop, but when I clicked Minimize Window
button, the Firefox disappeared and there was no icon on the panel, I
simply could not find it any more (it did not close), this was the
same for the terminal as well . How can I make the Firefox icon
visible on panel (or
I would like to ask that more flexibility be built into automatically
choosing sites for downloading.
I have just upgraded to CentOS 5.2. When I look for a mirror, I get many
choices from Taiwan. Since I am in Hong Kong this makes sense
geographically but not in terms of bandwidth.
Dear All
I am trying to allow a local user on the centos machine to be able to
run yum
What I have done is added him to the wheel group so that he can run
software, basically it's his own machine if he breaks it it's his
problem
But even after adding him to wheel, sys and adm group
Hi Harry,
Try to implement sudoers and add the group wheel inside from it (you can
modify it from /etc/sudoers or using visudo command). In that way, all your
users can use yum command.
Cheers,
-james
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Harry Sukumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear All
I am
Hi James,
Yes I tried to do this on another machine unfortunately this didn't work
for me, good you raised this topic
On the other machine I edited the visudo
User_Alias PROJECT = emma, paddy, sb
PROJECT ALL = !/usr/su, !/bin/su, !/usr/bin/passwd
And then did this
paddy,
On Thursday 26 June 2008 10:51:18 pm Harry Sukumar wrote:
Dear All
But even after adding him to wheel, sys and adm group he is unable to
install using yum
Ok, I'm new to CentOS and yum, but it seems to me that installing software
would need to have write permission to all the directories
C'est l'éditeur des sources
ou fournisseur des sources
puisque ce sont les sources de red hat qui sont recompilées par centos
++
--- En date de : Jeu 26.6.08, Manuel Wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
De: Manuel Wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: [CentOS-docs] Aide à la traduction
À: Mail
Niels de Vos wrote:
Well, looking for the string NSPluginWrapper and doing a text-search,
the only hit is the Japanese version of the Release Notes!? I don't
understand any of the text, but I interpret that the Japanese version of
CentOS-5.2 delivers nspluginwrapper as a new package...
Howdy,
It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is incomplete.
The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Kirk Bocek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is incomplete.
The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000
Kirk Bocek wrote:
Howdy,
It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is
incomplete. The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000
On 06/26/2008 07:39 PM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
Howdy,
It appears that CentOS 5.2's support for the RTL8111B/C chip is
incomplete. The wiki has some blanket statements regarding this support:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/CentOS5/RealTek/r1000
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
