I was thinking about your email this weekend and happen to run across this
book at the local Barnes Noble:
Object-Oriented Macromedia Flash MX - William Drol
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=53CY3FBL
DYisbn=1590590147itm=1
HTH,
Ryan Kime
-Original
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 12:08 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
With Flash on the other hand the Directory Structure is no longer the
starting point for organizing the code.
It can be. Flash development seems to be shifting toward having almost
the 'code' in real ActionScript files - on
Good advice. Couple of comments below:
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 05:15 AM, Benoit Hediard wrote:
Indeed, the 2 first recommandations to start to write clean Flash
code are
:
- stop thinking procedural programming think OO programming and
package
all you class in external .as
d'origine-
De : Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 28 février 2003 06:08
À : CF-Talk
Objet : Re: OT - Fusebox for Flash?
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 09:55 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote:
With Flash on the other hand the Directory Structure is no longer the
starting
Sean A. Corefield said:
It can be. Flash development seems to be shifting toward having almost
the 'code' in real ActionScript files - on the file system and
organized into components and libraries that you then assemble into
movies. Most of the work our Flash application development team is
Good question...
Many people are struggling with that right now...
I don't think that there isn't any structured development methodology for
FlashMX.
Building a Flash Widgets with MX is great and pretty straightforward (like
all the demos of RIA and Flash Remoting...).
But building real and
Very nice comments
- Original Message -
From: Benoit Hediard
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: OT - Fusebox for Flash?
Good question...
Many people are struggling with that right now...
I don't think that there isn't any structured
I don't think that there isn't any structured development
methodology for FlashMX.
I think it's important to separate methodology from framework. There
certainly are methodologies for building Flash applications. However, there
are no well-established frameworks. Lots of Flash developers are
Hi Dave,
I think it's important to separate methodology from framework. There
certainly are methodologies for building Flash applications.
However, there
are no well-established frameworks. Lots of Flash developers are building
Model-View-Controller or Model-View-Presenter apps in Flash, but
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 01:43 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote:
Is this possible? I've been looking for a structured development
methodology for rich-applications using Flash.
Most of the OO methodologies are applicable to Flash.
To me, Fusebox offers a solid framework for organizing and
Don't get me wrong, I love Flash.
I was only responding to the fact that many CF Developers encouter problems
when they try to build RIAs.
They don't know from where to start, even if they have understood Flash
Remoting, Flash Components and OOP ActionScript principles.
My point exactly. I need
It certainly doesn't have to be all over the place. I know that our
Flash apps team has produced very structured OO code for their
applications, based on a very sophisticated manager-based
architecture.
Can they bottle it and sale it?
My point exactly. I need order, reusability, documentation
that couples well with implementation. Let's face it, for
CFers, Flash requires a significant paradigm shift, one that
I believe is much more dramatic than the shift from Static
Pages to Dynamic Pages.
Yes, I agree, but I don't
It certainly doesn't have to be all over the place. I know that our
Flash apps team has produced very structured OO code for their
applications, based on a very sophisticated manager-based
architecture.
Does MM have any plans to share this rocket science with its customer (us)
any time soon?
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 12:43 US/Pacific, David K wrote:
Does MM have any plans to share this rocket science with its customer
(us)
any time soon? If so, when/where and, if not, please make a request
on our
behalf that they do so.
I would keep watching the Flash MX Application
: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT - Fusebox for Flash?
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 12:43 US/Pacific, David K wrote:
Does MM have any plans to share this rocket science with its customer
(us)
any time soon? If so
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 13:48 US/Pacific, Bryan F. Hogan wrote:
new site launches when can we expect it?
You know the party line by now: We are not allowed to pre-announce
release dates.
Think of it as the Spanish Inquisition... it'll turn up when you're not
expecting it! :)
Nbody
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT - Fusebox for Flash?
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 13:48 US/Pacific, Bryan F. Hogan wrote:
new site launches when can we expect it?
You know the party line by now: We are not allowed to pre-announce
release dates.
Think
On Thursday, Feb 27, 2003, at 09:55 US/Pacific, dwayne wrote:
With Flash on the other hand the Directory Structure is no longer the
starting point for organizing the code.
It can be. Flash development seems to be shifting toward having almost
the 'code' in real ActionScript files - on the
19 matches
Mail list logo
