complaining about the code? (Rhetorical question)
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Larry V [mailto:steph...@indiana.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:25 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Programming for an iPod - OT javascript/HTML question
I'm working on a form in CF that displays
I'm working on a form in CF that displays just fine on a desktop/laptop but the
javascript breaks in Safari once I introduce a div.
If anyone has a clue about this, please contact me off-list at
steph...@indiana.edu
Thanks.
So you have an example you can see online? Is it only mobile safari that breaks
or does desktop safari as well?
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Stephens, Larry V steph...@indiana.edu wrote:
I'm working on a form in CF that displays just fine on a desktop/laptop but
the javascript breaks in
Can you post a link?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Stephens, Larry V steph...@indiana.eduwrote:
I'm working on a form in CF that displays just fine on a desktop/laptop but
the javascript breaks in Safari once I introduce a div.
If anyone has a clue about this, please contact me off-list
Without any examples, it is tough to help out.
Couple things I'll toss out as starting points:
1. Validate your HTML and your JS. It won't cure every problem but it
is an easy step and gets rid of a lot of easy to miss sources of
error.
2. If you are really looking at a mobile device (as
Okay, I must be having a brain fart today - I'm trying to get a cell in a
table to NOT wrap. I actually want the text that doesn't fit to be hidden.
What am I missing? (btw, I'm coding only for IE for an internal app). I've
done this before, just can't remember what I did. I want the second
td style=width: 100px; overflow: hidden; nowrapTest Test Test Test Test
Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test
Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test /td
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Experienced CF Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I must be having a brain fart today -
/or... It must be .
-Original Message-
From: Experienced CF Developer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
Okay, I must be having a brain fart today - I'm trying to get a cell in a
table to NOT wrap. I actually want
Wim,
This didn't work for me. I still get the following:
http://www.zarts.com/test.cfm
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wim Lemmens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
td style=width: 100px; overflow
Subject: RE: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
You could also wrap the contents in the nobrwill not wrap/nobr tag.
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive services
Austin Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100 Hauppauge NY 11788
T : 631.231.6600 Ext. 119
F : 631.434.7022
www.austin-williams.com
Great
the following:
http://www.zarts.com/test.cfm
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wim Lemmens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
td style=width: 100px; overflow: hidden; nowrapTest Test Test Test Test
Test Test
) Stupid HTML Question
Wim,
This didn't work for me. I still get the following:
http://www.zarts.com/test.cfm
Dave
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http
though!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wim Lemmens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 8:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
That's what you wanted, no?
You say I actually want the text that doesn't fit to be hidden.
That's what you get.
Please
-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
That's what you wanted, no?
You say I actually want the text that doesn't fit to be hidden.
That's what you get.
Please explain correctly what you want.
Wim.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Experienced CF Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
The nobr tag did what I wanted. The code below did not work as you would
think it should (I had already tried those options myself). If you look at
the page at http://www.zarts.com/test.cfm you will see the code you gave me
below but you will also see that the cell still wraps.
FYI - I
23, 2008 8:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
td style=width: 100px; overflow: hidden; nowrapTest Test Test Test Test
Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test
Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test Test /td
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Experienced CF Developer
Ah, that's it. I'm only developing for IE for an internal app.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wim Lemmens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (ot) Stupid HTML Question
I only checked in FireFox. There it works correctly.
IE messes
The code below did not work as you would
think it should
Actually, it works with Mozilla and Opera, but not with IE nor Safari.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this
I would like to know if you can word wrap text in the a option tag.
Example:
select name=somename
option value=1Very long text here that needs to be wrapped/option
/select
David
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion
-
From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT HTML question select box option word warp
I would like to know if you can word wrap text in the a option tag.
Example:
select name=somename
option value=1Very long text here that needs
I think John meant this:
select name=somename
option value=1Very long text here that/option
option value=1 needs to be wrapped/option
/select
;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell:
I would like to know if you can word wrap text in the a
option tag.
Example:
select name=somename
option value=1Very long text here that needs to be
wrapped/option
/select
My experience with select boxes is that you're very limited in terms
of what kind of CSS you can apply to them.
Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SOT HTML question select box option word warp
I think John meant this:
select name=somename
option value=1Very long text
Thank you all for your help. I was hopping beyond hope for a css option,
but that does work. Thank you again for your help.
David
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SOT HTML question select box
Cheers Charlie that works :)
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2003 17:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simple html question
give this a try:
table style=border:1px solid #00;
charlie
- Original Message -
From: John McCosker
Forgive me if anyone mentioned this:
http://www.css-discuss.org/ hundreds of posts to this group's list are
typical in a given day... full wiki on the site... LOTS of opinions about
should and shouldn'ts, GREAT for help - almost as high a quality help as
CF-TALK! - :-)
OH - and if you
for the Web, it would be relevant.
Charlie
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: Simple html question
and the big question...does it work in Nutscrape and if so...how far back
Subject: Re: Simple html question
Well, the 'big question' may not be that big to everybody :)
Yes, it works in NS. Will it work in NS 4.x? I don't know.
Personally, I don't worry about NS 4.x anymore. In my opinion, the number
of users with NS 4.x is an acceptable level of loss. I
Sure you can.
Border:.1em solid black
-Original Message-
From: Andre Mohamed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simple html question
You can't get smaller than 1 pixel thickness (unless you consider
dotted/dashed borders)
table
give this a try:
table style=border:1px solid #00;
charlie
- Original Message -
From: John McCosker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Simple html question
Hi,
Just a very simple question,
is it possible to apply
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question
Try these sites for some good css/layouts.
http://glish.com/css/
http://www.bluerobot.com/web/layouts
Hi,
Just a very simple question,
is it possible to apply a style to a table to manipulate its border,
border=1 is just a tab to thick for the fine layout our designer has done.
I tried table style=border:1px;border-color:#00, but this just gives
the default border of one.
Can't seem to find
Tuesday, August 12, 2003, 1:53:25 PM, you wrote:
IS You bring up something that I have debated in my head many times. How can
IS anybody bring about better browser compliance so that it is easier to make
IS good clean and accessible web pages.
IS I have been working on a project for the last 6
html question
Hi Bryan:
I looked at 'tableless' design, and no...it's really not there yet.
Forget
cross-browser, there were significant enough differences between IE 5.5
and
IE 6 to make it a futile effort.
However, I don't feel that adhering to standards (in this case, W3C
standards
12, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Simple html question
You can't get smaller than 1 pixel thickness (unless you consider
dotted/dashed borders)
table style=border:1px solid black
tr
tdhello world/td
/tr
/table
That's as thin as you can get (it definitely doesn't look the same the
default
Don't forget http://www.oswd.org
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:09 pm
Subject: RE: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question
Try these sites for some good css/layouts.
http://glish.com/css/
http://www.bluerobot.com
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simple html question
Well, the 'big question' may not be that big to everybody :)
Yes, it works in NS. Will it work in NS 4.x? I don't know.
Personally, I don't worry about NS 4.x anymore. In my opinion
]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: Simple html question
and the big question...does it work in Nutscrape and if so...how far back?
version 4.x? ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t
Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question
You bring up something that I have debated in my head many times. How can
anybody bring about better browser compliance so that it is easier
-Original Message-
From: John McCosker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 August 2003 17:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Simple html question
Hi,
Just a very simple question,
is it possible to apply a style to a table to manipulate its border,
border=1 is just a tab to thick for the fine layout
standards by
default and table for NS4 only on some stuff I do).
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question
You bring up something that I have debated in my head
I've seen the various css layout sites (http://www.csszengarden.com/ being
one of my favorites), and they're all great to show what could be done...but
IMO it's still not practical to try and develop a full site using only CSS
for layout.
Completely agree! Building three sites, all on limited
12, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: Simple html question
You can't get smaller than 1 pixel thickness (unless you consider
dotted/dashed borders)
table style=border:1px solid black
tr
tdhello world/td
/tr
/table
That's as thin as you can get (it definitely doesn't look the same the
default
I usually use style=border: 1px solid #00;
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: John McCosker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:36 AM
Subject: Simple html question
Hi,
Just a very simple question,
is it possible to apply a style to a table
]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question
Ya I haven't looked too closely yet at tableless page design yet, but I
know some folks locally have gone full blown CSS only.
Now I've seen this approach totally
Bravo!!!
Someone cc this to IE, NS, Opera etc...
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Robichaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simple html question
CHARLIE... I COULD NOT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF!!
cheers!
Charlie Griefer
URL fragments, used to reference named anchors, and query strings are not
mutually exclusive in any respect. You can use either or both within a
request. If you use both, the query string is processed by the application
server, and the URL fragment is used by the browser to navigate to the
I just inherited a web site from another developer.
Several times he is used the following code:
cfoutput
A HREF=RecordEdit.cfm###header#/A
/cfoutput
Can anyone explain what purpose the '##' serves at the end of the HREF?
Thanks!
Peter BAgnato
I am not sure what he is actually using it for, but the output would be
RecordEdit.cfm# (one #)
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: Basic HTML Question
: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Basic HTML Question
I just inherited a web site from another developer.
Several times he is used the following code:
cfoutput
A HREF=RecordEdit.cfm###header#/A
/cfoutput
Can
HTML Question
Importance: High
I am not sure what he is actually using it for, but the output would be
RecordEdit.cfm# (one #)
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:47 PM
Oops .. you are right ... ### would leave one ... nothing like wrong answers
:)
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: Basic HTML Question
i would assume
Subject: Re: Basic HTML Question
Importance: High
Oops .. you are right ... ### would leave one ... nothing like wrong answers
:)
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:53 PM
Message -
From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Basic HTML Question
I just inherited a web site from another developer.
Several times he is used the following code:
cfoutput
A HREF=RecordEdit.cfm###header
Oops .. you are right ... ### would leave one ... nothing
like wrong answers :)
No, you were right. In a string marked for output (within a CFOUTPUT, for
example), if you want to use a literal pound sign you can escape it by
doubling it. If you placed three pound signs together within a
It's an anchor, however its not a named anchor, so it links to the top of
the page.
- Original Message -
From: E. Keith Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: Basic HTML Question
I've used that, however, with a named
It could be that he uses anchors a lot and typing # at the end of a file
name is habitual (though I've never met anyone who used them more often than
query strings, being that they're almost mutually exclusive), or it could be
the result of a poorly formed multi-file replace in CF Studio.
I just
It could be that he uses anchors a lot and typing #
at the end of a file name is habitual (though I've
never met anyone who used them more often than query
strings, being that they're almost mutually exclusive),
or it could be the result of a poorly formed multi-file
replace in CF
paul smith wrote:
Page displays fine in IE
Page does not display in Netscape unless I put TABLE border 0
Tables are involved, but no missing TABLE/TR/TD tags.
Did you try http://validator.w3.org
What is the URL?
Jochem
At 10:46 AM 1/7/03 +0100, you wrote:
paul smith wrote:
Page displays fine in IE
Page does not display in Netscape unless I put TABLE border 0
Tables are involved, but no missing TABLE/TR/TD tags.
Did you try http://validator.w3.org
No.
What is the URL?
Page is password-protected.
At 10:46 AM 1/7/03 +0100, you wrote:
Did you try http://validator.w3.org
Yes. It refused to check an html-only version of the following (something
about character set).
With border=1 replaced by border=0 in the following, Netscape 4.79 does
not display the following - IE 5.50 does.
best,
paul smith wrote:
At 10:46 AM 1/7/03 +0100, you wrote:
Did you try http://validator.w3.org
Yes. It refused to check an html-only version of the following (something
about character set).
Add a charset meta tag (but I don't think NN 4.x does unicode):
meta http-equiv=Content-Type
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The Definitive
Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel quotes are needed (where
they are not needed ;-).
best, paul
At 05:07 PM 1/7/03 +0100, you wrote:
snip bad html
You need a lot of quotes around tag attributes there.
paul smith wrote:
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The Definitive
Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel quotes are needed (where
they are not needed ;-).
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/intro/sgmltut.html#idx-attribute-6
% signs require quotes. And the way you
As I mentioned before, I had already tried quoting. I just now added hash
marks. No change. So whether or not they are needed, the absence of
quotes or hash marks is not why Netscape 4.79 is being stubborn
best, paul
At 05:56 PM 1/7/03 +0100, you wrote:
paul smith wrote:
Nope. Tried
.
lookup xhtml and try to follow that, if you give a hoot about your markup.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: HTML Question
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: HTML Question
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The Definitive
Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel quotes are needed (where
they are not needed
think that
only had to do with style sheets)
Good luck, xhtml man :)
Rob
-Original Message-
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: HTML Question
Thank you for sharing that, Rob.
And the reason Netscape 4.79 refuses
: January 7, 2003 1:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: HTML Question
Table width=99% didn't help either. But thanx anyway xhtml man ;-)
Looks like it's a NS 4.79 thingy since NS 4.76 works and NS
4.79 doesn't.
I think I'll punt since so few use NS.
best, paul
At 10:54 AM 1/7/03
:)
Rob
-Original Message-
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: HTML Question
Thank you for sharing that, Rob.
And the reason Netscape 4.79 refuses to display unless TABLE border 0 is?
best, paul
At 10:11 AM 1
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The
Definitive Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel
quotes are needed (where they are not needed ;-).
I think you've blasphemed. Here's the bible:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
Any book about a specification, no matter how good, is
I hate it when people do not put in those quotes
Robert Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Famous for nothing!
http://www.tinetics.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: HTML Question
Nope
Dave Watts wrote:
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The
Definitive Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel
quotes are needed (where they are not needed ;-).
I think you've blasphemed. Here's the bible:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
That is just the Old Testament
I think you've blasphemed. Here's the bible:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/
That is just the Old Testament :-)
If you're a fundamentalist, that's all there is!
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: HTML Question
Nope. Tried that. Besides, check out the bible, HTML The
Definitive Guide by Musciano Kennedy. They don't feel
quotes are needed (where they are not needed ;-).
I think you've blasphemed
Did you try using #s for your colors? If they are inside of a
cfoutput, you will need to escape them like so; bgcolor=##b4d0dc. I
seem to recall having this issue before and doing this solved my
problem.
MW
-Original Message-
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
With border=1
Yep. Escaped them, too. Even with quotes. No help.
best, paul
At 02:48 PM 1/7/03 -0500, you wrote:
Did you try using #s for your colors? If they are inside of a
cfoutput, you will need to escape them like so; bgcolor=##b4d0dc. I
seem to recall having this issue before and doing this solved
Page displays fine in IE
Page does not display in Netscape unless I put TABLE border 0
Tables are involved, but no missing TABLE/TR/TD tags.
Suggestions?
best, paul
~|
Archives:
Add 'border=1' and set it to the same color as the background.
| -Original Message-
| From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:21 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: OT: HTML Question
|
|
| Page displays fine in IE
|
| Page does not display in Netscape
Microsoft says Netscape Bad
Flamesuit on :)
-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML Question
Add 'border=1' and set it to the same color as the background.
| -Original Message-
| From
I don't use Netscrape that much, but I do find Netscrape 4.79 loads pages
almost twice as fast as Internet Exploader 5.50, and Netscrape starts up 5
to 10 times as fast.
best, paul
At 09:17 PM 1/6/03 -0500, you wrote:
Microsoft says Netscape Bad
How do you keep carriage returns in a textarea?
I am passing a form to a printable page. When I output the textarea the carriage
returns are gone. How can I stop this from happening?
...
Get your own free email account from
http://www.popmail.com
Enclose it in pre tags. Or use ParagraphFormat().
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ecreese;popmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Easy HTML Question
How do you keep carriage returns in a textarea?
I am passing a form
###
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ecreese;popmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Easy HTML Question
How do you keep carriage returns in a textarea?
I am passing a form to a printable page. When I output the textarea the
carriage
]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:51 PM
Subject: Easy HTML Question
How do you keep carriage returns in a textarea?
I am passing a form to a printable page. When I output the textarea the
carriage returns are gone. How can I stop this from happening
2 ways.
1. Wrap the field in a set of PRE tags. The font will default to Courier, but what the
hey.
2. replace all carriage returns with BR tags
cfset field=replace(field,#chr(10)#,BR,ALL)
HTH
Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/08/02 04:51PM
How do you keep carriage returns in a textarea?
2 ways.
1. Wrap the field in a set of PRE tags. The font will
default to Courier, but what the hey.
2. replace all carriage returns with BR tags
cfset field=replace(field,#chr(10)#,BR,ALL)
HTH
Jerry Johnson
Well this should work also...
pre style=font-family: verdana;#field#/pre
Isaac
Netscape is VERY fussy about tables - which is good (and a reason why you
should test sites under different browsers wherever possible).
Of course it has (NS) other features that frustrate also.
~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to
This @#$^@ HTML will work in everything but Netscape 4 and my eyes hurt from
going over and over and over and over again trying to see something.
Hopefully a new set of eyes will find it.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
html
head
titleUntitled/title
/head
-
EMPOWER-XL ***Software for Higher Education***
http://www.empower-xl.com
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: A Netscape HTML
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: A Netscape HTML Question
This @#$^@ HTML will work in everything but Netscape 4 and my eyes hurt from
going over and over and over and over again
, September 24, 2001 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: A Netscape HTML Question
This @#$^@ HTML will work in everything but Netscape 4 and my eyes hurt from
going over and over and over and over again trying to see something.
Hopefully a new set of eyes will find it.
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD
Netscape HTML Question
Works for me in netscape 4.7. what version of 4 are you using?
Steven D Dworman
-
Web Consultant
Systems Administrator
ComSpec International - http://www.comspec-intnl.com
phone: 248.647.8841
cell
4.77
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Steven Dworman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: A Netscape HTML Question
Works for me in netscape 4.7. what version
-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:02 PM
Subject: A Netscape HTML Question
This @#$^@ HTML will work in everything but Netscape 4 and my eyes hurt
from
going over and over and over and over again trying to see something.
Hopefully a new set of eyes will find
In this section of code:
tr
td width=4nbsp;/td
table width=616
tr
td width=616 colspan=2 nowrap
Test
/td
/tr
/table
/td
/tr
you're closing your td at the top and then closing another td that
Acutally he juts had an extra /td
-Original Message-
From: Alex Santantonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: A Netscape HTML Question
You are missing a TD COLSPAN=2 on line 31 just before you are opening your
3rd
, 2001 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: A Netscape HTML Question
You are missing a TD COLSPAN=2 on line 31 just before you are opening
your 3rd nested table. You have a lot of nested tables that are
unnecessary, and I don't think with your current layout it will do quite
what you are intending
Your first Bob line and the third blank line in the nested table are
missing colspan=3 in the TD tags.
What works for me is to set each table to a different width and border
color. That way you can see what cells are in each table, where they are
laid out, and any missing columns, etc.
John
work.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: A Netscape HTML Question
Acutally he juts had an extra /td
-Original Message-
From: Alex Santantonio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
