Graham Fawcett scripsit:
> Some of the things I would have used in my elevator pitch for Chicken
> (keeping in mind that Web apps are my thing):
These should be posted to the Wiki.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ccil.org/~cowan
Original line from The Warrior's Apprentice by Lois Mc
On 9/24/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:29:25PM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> > Just calling it produces r.
> Yes, this is (afaik) a deviation from the standard. ... I want
> an error if I forgot to receive all values, I don't want the first
> value
This beh
On 9/25/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:04:19AM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> > > Why would anyone use anything else?
> > Would you mind convincing my boss? :)
> Get into the queue! :-)
For what it
Hallo,
On 9/25/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:04:19AM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> > Once I spelled receive correctly it works like a champ. Thanks.I
> > cannot
> > get over what a great language Scheme is and what a great system Chicken is.
> > Why w
William Ramsay scripsit:
> Thanks again.What I was missing in trying to use receive was that
> the results
> must be handled inside the body of the procedure.
If you actually want a list, it's easy to get one with
(receive foo (whatever x y z) foo)
--
John Cowan[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:04:19AM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> Once I spelled receive correctly it works like a champ. Thanks.I
> cannot
> get over what a great language Scheme is and what a great system Chicken is.
> Why would anyone use anything else?
Would you mind convincing my boss?
Once I spelled receive correctly it works like a champ. Thanks.I
cannot
get over what a great language Scheme is and what a great system Chicken is.
Why would anyone use anything else?
Thanks again.What I was missing in trying to use receive was that
the results
must be handled insid
On 9/24/07, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:29:25PM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> > Why not just return a list and make it simple?
I forgot to add this form, which "returns a list":
(receive my-list (imlib:pixel/rgba img x y)
(do-something-with my-list))
It
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:42:22PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Yes, this is (afaik) a deviation from the standard. I don't like
> it one bit, precisely for this reason: it's damned confusing. I want
> an error if I forgot to receive all values, I don't want the first
> value, dammit!
Sorry for the
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:29:25PM -0400, William Ramsay wrote:
> That's the problem, I don't know what to use.I've tried call-with-values
> and receive, but both give me errors, mostly because I have no idea what
> I'm doing.Receive expects (name1 name2 ...) valexp body, but this
> produc
>On 9/24/07, William Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the problem, I don't know what to use.I've tried call-with-values
> and receive, but both give me errors, mostly because I have no idea what
> I'm doing.
> The call to (imlib:pixel img x y) should return the r, g, b, a values
> o
That's the problem, I don't know what to use.I've tried call-with-values
and receive, but both give me errors, mostly because I have no idea what
I'm doing.Receive expects (name1 name2 ...) valexp body, but this
produces an error since name1 is not a command.
Why not just return a list a
Hallo,
On 9/24/07, William Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone explain to me how to get the four values from the imlib2 egg
> procedure (imlib:pixel/rgba img x y)? It seems to only return the
> first value,
> but it's supposed to return four values. This may be more of a sc
13 matches
Mail list logo
