RE: Time-Base ISDN connection [7:48991]

2002-07-17 Thread _ Einstooge _
Yes, Yes, Here is THE link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/10.html; Later, M Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48993t=48991 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

CCIE LAB Date 8-15-02 [7:48964]

2002-07-17 Thread Stout, Terry
Would anyone like to switch dates with me , I am looking for Mid September to early October, 2002. Terry Stout Design Engineer 504-846-7697 Office 504-723-5375 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ATM fore CCIE [7:48892]

2002-07-17 Thread Roberts, Larry
You will not have to configure an ATM switch nor LANE. You WILL however be responsible for connecting to an ATM switch from your router. I would know how to do PVC/SVC's on the LAB, especially PVC autodiscovery I haven't sat the lab so this is not an NDA violation. If you follow the link that

RE: Time-Base ISDN connection [7:48991]

2002-07-17 Thread Andrew Larkins
you need normal ISDN dialup config. The only difference is that on the access lists for interesting traffic, you add a time range. I have attached the time range and sample access list below: access-list 145 remark Interesting traffic access-list 145 deny eigrp any any access-list 145 deny

Re: New Lab Format [7:48731]

2002-07-17 Thread The_Jester
If there weren't any bugs, it wouldn't be Cisco. Ken Diliberto wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I interpret the question to inquire if one should take Lab version 1.0 or wait for Lab version 1.01. There are bound to be bugs. The_Jester 07/14/02 04:40PM The

Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Wesley
Hello Group, Three things to confirm about broadcasts. a) the all ones broadcast i.e 255.255.255.255 by default will only be propagated to the local network and is not forwarded by routers b) network and subnet directed broadcasts. If I were to broadcast to 192.168.1.255, and I have subnets

running Realserver behind PIX to server realplayer [7:48998]

2002-07-17 Thread Magdy Ibrahim
Hi all, I have internal LAN behind my PIX firewall with 6.0(1)... My realserver8.0 installed in the internal LAN . I need to allow the outside users using real player to access and run videos and movies... My PIX conf.as the following: fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol http 80 fixup protocol

RE: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me tell you about this experience I have with this and if someone could please explain it. I usually telnet into my mini-lab and open a session for each router and switch. I also have the exec-timeout 0 0 command for the vty interfaces. So at night when I go to bed ... I put my W2K machine

RE: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Hi Wesley, a) correct b) no, as 192.168.1.32/27, 192.168.1.64/27 and 192.168.1.96/27 are on a different subnet to the broadcast 192.168.1.255 (this is for the 192.168.1.224/27 subnet). c) from the answer to b), no. Only hosts on the 192.168.1.224/27 subnet will see the broadcast packet of

Re: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Wesley
Then how would you define an all /27 subnets broadcast i.e. not just 192.168.1.224 subnet getting the broadcast but all subnets? Thank you for the reply BTW. Vicuna, Mark wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Wesley, a) correct b) no, as 192.168.1.32/27,

bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread birdy
Can anyone tell me why I have 2 Mbps WAN connection that reached 95 % utilisation during peak time. When I try to ping to my provider serial interface(next hop),it register 10% packet loss My router serial interface is showing 1.9Mbps (incoming traffic). Since the router is receiving 1.9

Re: Passed MPLS exam [7:48825]

2002-07-17 Thread Chee Kin
Congrats! Have you taken the mcast+qos paper? If you already have, what books do you recommend? Thanks. Regards, cheekin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello Group, Last,Saturday I passed the cisco MPLS exam. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K

RE: bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread Richard Botham
Birdy, What about the interface buffer that has to cope with buffering the packets. Just because you've got 100k left to deal with it doesn't necessarily mean that the router can HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49003t=49002

ATM Question [7:49007]

2002-07-17 Thread Casey, Paul (6822)
Hello Can some tell me the requirments for atm for the lab I have the following 3640 ATM Support (NM-4T1-IMA) and the 3640 routers. Are those cards any good to me, Do I need an ATM switch or can I put this stuff back to back. Any help appreciated. Kind regards. Paul

RE: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Vicuna, Mark
It will be the all 1's bit for that subnet eg. for 192.168.1.224/27 it would be 192.168.1.255 and for 192.168.1.32/27 it would be 192.168.1.63. HTH, Mark. -Original Message- From: Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 6:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not a VOIP expert but this is just an idea based on my other job and one at which I have lots of unplanned experience with. From my experience with running data over analog lines, I would say an analog modem is probably the best option. Modems are extremely sensitive to noise / etc on a

Re: bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread Phil Barker
Possibly, but is anyone actually complaining about the speed ? Check the serial interface at your end also for dropped packets, load, reliability etc over a period of about a week. If that average is over 90% then you may well do with an upgrade. Phil. --- birdy wrote: Can anyone tell me

AS5300 Mica modems [7:49010]

2002-07-17 Thread Reza
Hi Group I'm setting up a new Cisco As5300 NAS . it has one 4 E1 Module and two mica 60 digital modem modules. every thing is OK but when I dial-up to it , there is not any beep from the modems . I debuged the CAS , CSM on it , but I can't find the Problem 00:53:07: from Trunk(0): (0/8): Rx

RE: Need Cheap ATM Switch [7:48945]

2002-07-17 Thread Terry Hines
Thanks for the info, My objective would be to get a feel for end to end ATM then migrate to xdsl. My current Environment has several 25xx devices 2 2620's and 2 3620's. When I buy a switch I will need to interface it to these devices. -Original Message- From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL

A BGP questiion. [7:49013]

2002-07-17 Thread Casey, Paul (6822)
Can anyone help me with this. How do you configure a router, so that when its neighbours make a BGP change, the BGP change will take effect without resetting the BGP TCP session. Kind regards, Paul.

FW: PIX 520 Motherboard repair replace [7:48959]

2002-07-17 Thread cebuano
Mike, If this has been asked before, I apologize for missing it. Is there a specific Intel NIC model required for this to work? Is there a way to tell if it's a 2Mb or 8 or 16 Flash card? Do you have some info on types of errors you see if the Flash is DOA? Last, what flash file are you running

Re: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Richard Tufaro
Why don't people get the notion that a Firewall is essentially a router. PIX = Firewall = Router... Firewall = Router. It ROUTES Jeffrey Reed 07/16 8:19 PM I?m still pretty green with PIX in general and was talking today about introducing a PIX into an existing network. The customer has a

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Richard, I used Nokia appliances running CheckPoint in a previous life and it truly was a real router with a firewall application running on it. Very capable of many different configuration options. I purchased a 501 PIX to start playing with in the lab and a damn customer borrowed it and is now

RE: A BGP questiion. [7:49013]

2002-07-17 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Hi Paul, What you mean by change? Assuming that an UPDATE is sent, and everything going smoothly - will keep the TCP session alive. Receipt of a Notification as a result of what may happen during and after the neighbor's 'change' will disconnect the tcp session with the peer. HTH, Mark.

Re: A BGP questiion. [7:49013]

2002-07-17 Thread Johnny Routin
Router config# neighbor {ip-address | peer-group-name} soft-reconfiguration inbound JR Casey, Paul (6822) wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can anyone help me with this. How do you configure a router, so that when its neighbours make a BGP change, the BGP

Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]

2002-07-17 Thread Marty Adkins
GEORGE wrote: Hi all I have a question ,I configured my e-mail server to only accept local e-mail, and deny other relay , however im still vulnerable to spam. My question is how do the ips block other e-mail going to their smtp Do they do it by access-list? Allowing only the local network

OT Q. SSL Accelerators [7:49020]

2002-07-17 Thread Richard Tufaro
Hey all, kinda off topic but wanted to throw it out there and see what info I could gleen. My company is looking into a SSL Accelerator for use with a Lotus web client. Anyone have any recommendations, horror stories, etc? Thanks. Message Posted at:

Re: AS5300 Mica modems [7:49010]

2002-07-17 Thread MADMAN
The Micas don't beep. Dave Reza wrote: Hi Group I'm setting up a new Cisco As5300 NAS . it has one 4 E1 Module and two mica 60 digital modem modules. every thing is OK but when I dial-up to it , there is not any beep from the modems . I debuged the CAS , CSM on it , but I can't find

FW: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
I would say place an internal router behind the pix so I can route Your internal network, or vlans's that's the way we design it here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Reed Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
I am not sure I would class a PIX as a router in the true sense of the word, yes it does route traffic from interface to interface but would I use it as a router, NO, it only supports ONE routing protocol RIP, that does not constitute a good router in my eyes. Now to the question, just reading

Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]

2002-07-17 Thread Nigel Taylor
George, Priscilla brings up a good point in that this will not be easy. The most important issue here is as Priscilla pointed out, is going to revolve around the architecture of your networks or the network you use for connectivity(to the rest of the world). Some other questions that

RE: Please help me with my new baby(Pix 501) [7:48760]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
conduit permit icmp any any -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Juan Blanco Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please help me with my new baby(Pix 501) [7:48760] Team, I just got my new baby Pix 501

boson Router Simulator ..Verdict [7:49004]

2002-07-17 Thread Kerry
Ladies Gents, I am considering buying Boson's Router Simulator! I would be grateful if anyone out there that has used it can give a feedback on what they think about the software! I am CCNP, I just need something on my laptop I can used to try thing out. Thanks for your anticipated help

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
Hi Richard, The simple answer to your question is yes you need a seperate router outside the pix. Leave your internal router alone and just add a default route pointing at the pix interface . He doesn't necessarily have to be using VLANS as long as all the subnets is routing for are on the

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
This is actually a little of topic now but it raised a question for me, how do you add subinterfaces to a ethernet interface without enabling ISL/802.1q from my experience the router does not permit this and requires that you first enable ISL/802.1q. If you have ISL/802.1q you must have VLANs.

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Can you do a dot1q trunk into a PIX? Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: PIX Design

BSCI [7:49028]

2002-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, Anyone taken the latest BSCI exam ?Heard that it has simulations,Any idea about that ? Does anyone knows the passing score of this ? Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Sorry, I meant secondary interfaces... but you answered the question. Thanks!! Jeffrey Reed Classic Networking, Inc. Cell 717-805-5536 Office 717-737-8586 FAX 717-737-0290 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robertson, Douglas Sent:

nbar [7:49030]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
Is nbar supported on layer 3 switches? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49030t=49030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-17 Thread sam sneed
By default, most OS's will keep the sockets open. When you created a socket, you can include the SO_KEEPALIVE option. This will keep the socket open for tcp_keepalive_interval value of the OS, the defult is 2 hours on microsoft and Solaris sysems. If you do not use this socket options they will

RE: Voice of IP / Frame-Relay and remote labs [7:48947]

2002-07-17 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
Manish, I think you have solved my problem ...Thanks also to Steven, Priscilla, Tangled up in Blue, Brad and Bernard; I will try your suggestions to. Pierre-Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49031t=48947 -- FAQ,

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
Not yet, hopefully soon. The only Firewall hardware platform that I'm aware of that supports it is the Nokia with Checkpoint. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2002 16:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

VPN with Cisco 806 [7:49034]

2002-07-17 Thread Dain Deutschman
Hi Everyone, VPN Question: I have a client with 16 small locations ( 2-8 nodes per location ) that may want to access a Windows Terminal Server at a central site in the future to run thier database app. Not all the locations have broadband internet access...although they will within a year or

Bridging LANs over VPN [7:49035]

2002-07-17 Thread exchange
Hi All, Does anybody know of a way to setup VPN to bridge traffic between two LANs using a Cisco router and either a VPN client or something else? I only have one Cisco router and the other end can be anything. I tried setting up IPSEC over VPN under Cisco IOS and it works but it doesn't

Cisco VPN client and dial-up [7:49036]

2002-07-17 Thread Paul
Hi guy's ... If I dial-up to an ISP .. get a connection .. then activate the Cisco VPN client 3.1 .. I get a secure VPN connection ... However, if I set the VPN client to dial the ISP automatically then create a secure VPN connection .. I fail to get connected nad get a connection to ISP

Re: AS5300 Mica modems [7:49010]

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Williams
That's what I was thinking (and about to reply with) but I wasn't for sure if there wasn't some option to turn on some sound capability. But now that I'm thinking about it, you can look at those MICA SIMMS and there is clearly no speaker on them =) Mike W. MADMAN wrote: The Micas don't

RE: bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
birdy wrote: Can anyone tell me why I have 2 Mbps WAN connection that reached 95 % utilisation during peak time. For how long was it at 95%? That would definitely worry me, unless it turned out that the peak was just a few seconds or something. When I try to ping to my provider

2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]

2002-07-17 Thread W. Kevin Hunt
We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial

Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]

2002-07-17 Thread W. Kevin Hunt
I wouldn't even think of using a router for this purpose unless you are only using smtp mail between your own sites and don't want outside email f/ anywhere. We run spamassasin (www.spamassasin.org) on our mail server and it cuts out 80-90% of our SPAM. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME

Re: VOIP with 2600 Router [7:48709]

2002-07-17 Thread Gaz
I'm not sure. I think I found the answer. I didn't understand the two stage dialling which I think I do now. The voip dial peer sends all digits whereas the pots dial peer strips the matched digits. The destination pattern for an operator (dial 0) on a remote site would be something like:

OT: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-17 Thread Roberts, Larry
Guys, I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management platform for all our servers, as well as our routers and switches. We are 2 distinct group with no cross-functionality between the Wan group and the Server group. Our Server guys are trying to purchase OpenView to manage it all,

mpls vis a vis the routing switching track [7:49048]

2002-07-17 Thread Mirza, Timur
based on the url above, can i understand that after token, igrp token over dlsw will no longer be on the routing switching exam after october, that mpls will NOT become part of the routing switching track, since it has already been classified as part of the communications services track?

Re: New Lab Format [7:48731]

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Witte
I personally had a Nov 4th lab date and was able to swap to a Oct 24th date a couple of weeks ago. My thinking was that if they are getting rid of IPX and token switch stuff(fairly easy), that content will be replaced by other areas, not neccesarily the 3550 switch. I was totally geared up to

Re: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Wesley wrote: So there isn't a broadcast address for all /27 subnets? I don't think sending to all subnets of a network is something that IP ever defined. I basically understand that the last address of each subnet is reserved for subnet broadcast. I was just wondering if the

Re: VPN with Cisco 806 [7:49034]

2002-07-17 Thread chris
Why don't you elimated the software vpn clients and terminate a single vpn tunnel on the 806, perfromance will be alot better. The 806 should be fine in this scenario. Chris Dain Deutschman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Everyone, VPN Question: I have a

RE: boson Router Simulator ..Verdict [7:49004]

2002-07-17 Thread Michael Witte
Don't waste your time. Get a couple of 2500 routers and serial crossover on EBAY. I got mine for around $450. The Boson won't do debugs and a lot of other things you need. You will want the equipment anyway when you go for the lab. Message Posted at:

Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]

2002-07-17 Thread Don Queen
You'll need a mail relay program like Worldsecure(now Tumbleweed) that searches the content of the message before relaying it to the internal e-mail server. As others have stated, other e-mail servers will open smtp connections to your mail server in order to send mail. Most spammers change IP

Re: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]

2002-07-17 Thread Chuck
Just had something come up with a customer along these lines. Your provider may or may not do MPPP with customers. I believe SBCIS, for example, will not do it no way no how. So first thing, check with your provider as to what they are willing to do. Per packet load share on the 26xx platform

Off Topic - Whither IS-IS - Cisco's vision going forward [7:49057]

2002-07-17 Thread Chuck
I have now seen and heard this from several sources within Cisco - IS-IS is not being considered in the L3 switches other than those we would call core I.e. the 4cxxx and the 3550-xx L3 switches do not support IS-IS, nor are there plans to do so on those boxes. Recognizing that things can

RE: Control Break Sequence [7:4988]

2002-07-17 Thread Daniel Cotts
Original question was to jobs list. DanC moved it to Groupstudy. Can you get into any other router with the same laptop running the same terminal emulation software? i.e. Is the problem the router or the terminal emulation software? If software you can go to Hilgraeve.com and download a version

RE: VPN with Cisco 806 [7:49034]

2002-07-17 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
Hi Chris, I would suggest going with one of the bigger VPN optimized routers such as the 1700 series. I'm pretty sure the 800 would not be able to support 15 tunnels using 3des (assuming your going to use 3des). Normally the 800 would be used in one of the remote sites, with a 1700 or so in

Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:49060]

2002-07-17 Thread Christopher Supino
All, Has anyone tried the CIM products? I was considering purchasing the BGP CIM and wanted to get some feedback before making the investment. Chris Christopher Supino CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, Compaq ASE, CNA Senior Network Design Engineer TransNet Corp. 45 Columbia Road Somerville, New Jersey

RE: Off Topic - Whither IS-IS - Cisco's vision going forward [7:49061]

2002-07-17 Thread Moffett, Ryan
I attended Networkers 2002 in San Diego and got the impression to look out for more IS-IS in the future. Specifically, Cisco is working to achieve feature parity between OSPF and IS-IS, plus comments were made in the Router Architecture Power Session that IS-IS is getting a stronger Enterprise

RE: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]

2002-07-17 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router

RE: Control Break Sequence [7:4988]

2002-07-17 Thread YASSER ALY
Once upon a time I have been told that doing the following will let you to the ROMMON even if you don't know the proper break key combinations 1- Open your software that you use to access the router through the console. 2- Adjust the Baud Rate to be 2400 bps 3- Power on your router. 4- Keep

FW: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
Thanks for your replies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Queen Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: blocking spam with cisco routers [7:48971] You'll need a mail relay program like

gk_process Error decoding RAS Message...discarding [7:49067]

2002-07-17 Thread Reza
Hi Group I have a problem on my gatekeeper , I turned ras, h225 , gatekeeper debugs on and then I get this error message when my gateway sends a call to my gatekeeper gk_process Error decoding RAS Message...discarding I searched for the meaning of the message and I found : When a router is

RE: mpls vis a vis the routing switching track [7:49048]

2002-07-17 Thread Mirza, Timur
i forgot to include the url, here it is: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/cert.html -Original Message- From: Mirza, Timur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mpls vis a vis the routing switching track

Voice jargon [7:49068]

2002-07-17 Thread blitzlight
Hi all, I'm currenty preparing for CIPTSS certification, and as I'm coming from data background, I find myself swimming in a foreign pool and start getting drowned with different voice codecs, standards, signalling etc. I should say the learning curve is really steep. Having said that, it's

MCP Magazine's 7th Annual Salary Survey [7:49063]

2002-07-17 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
FYI, http://mcpmag.com/salarysurveys/ Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job?

RE: FW: PIX 520 Motherboard repair replace [7:48959]

2002-07-17 Thread Mike Sweeney
Intel Etherexpress 10/100B which has a S82557 chipset. Others may work but these I've tested and have been very reliable. I have a close up shot of the NIC here(along with other parts) www.packetattack.com/frankenpix.html I dont know of a way to tell the 16Meg flash apart from the 2 meg flash

I need a help from you guys. (NAT, IPSEC and Extended [7:49069]

2002-07-17 Thread Leonardo Borda
Hello ALL I am having a very interesting problem here. Please any help will be very appreciate because I have tried to find out documents and so on and I did not find nothing yet... SCENARIO: I have a cisco 2600 router doing NAT and VPN. - My ethernet has 192.168.25.0/255.255.255.0 as primary

dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
If I have subinterfaces configured for my vlans' and I wanted a dhcp server for one vlan can I create the dhcp server and assign it to that subinterfaces pertaining the vlan in question. I don't have a server on that vlan Message Posted at:

500CS Comm Server [7:49071]

2002-07-17 Thread trammer
By any chance would anyone have a sample config for the 500-CS box that they wouldn't mind posting. Trying to get reverse telnet working and most configs are for the 2509-2511. I'm either not looking in the right place or I'm not configuring it right for this older box. Thanks in advance.

Back to back serial connection [7:49046]

2002-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, When configuring a back to back serial connection on cisco 2600 router,When configuring the clock rate(DCE ROUTER) I can see the max clock rate speed of 800 bits per sec (8 mbps).I have two questions regarding this 1.When I try to configure this I get an error message Invalid input

Re: Voice jargon [7:49068]

2002-07-17 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Yes, it's the same thing. Everything I learned was from Cisco press, there's a couple of great books out there. blitzlight wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I'm currenty preparing for CIPTSS certification, and as I'm coming from data background, I find

Re: VPN with Cisco 806 [7:49034]

2002-07-17 Thread chris
Ah I read the post wrong, I was thinking deploying the 806s at the remote sites, and using a larger rotuer at the headend. I would use a 2651 there, the vpn bundles are reasonable and have the aim card for encrytion. Re-readng id software clients are what he want to deploy then I would suggest

RE: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Vicuna, Mark wrote: It will be the all 1's bit for that subnet eg. for 192.168.1.224/27 it would be 192.168.1.255 and for 192.168.1.32/27 it would be 192.168.1.63. I think he was asking how would you send to all the subnets. And the answer is, you wouldn't. Why would you want to do such a

RE: dhcp and subinterfaces [7:49070]

2002-07-17 Thread Tim Potier
You can. Just need to put the ip helper-address statement on those sub-ints. As long as the router can reach the DHCP server, so will the DHCP requests/replies. Hope this helps. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49073t=49070

Re: management platforms [7:49042]

2002-07-17 Thread Steven A. Ridder
You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf. Roberts, Larry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, I'm trying to justify why I don't want a single management

Re: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Wesley
So there isn't a broadcast address for all /27 subnets? I basically understand that the last address of each subnet is reserved for subnet broadcast. I was just wondering if the broadcasting architecture allowed for all subnets to be broadcasted at once. And Mark, since you are the only one

Re: 500CS Comm Server [7:49071]

2002-07-17 Thread Vance Krier
Cheers. V-- ANM-508CS#wr t Current configuration: ! hostname ANM-508CS ! enable-password ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet 0 ip address 192.168.0.253 255.255.255.0 ! ip default-gateway 192.168.0.1 ! ! ! ip name-server 255.255.255.255 snmp-server community ! ! line vty 0 4 login line con 0

Re: VOIP with 2600 Router [7:48709]

2002-07-17 Thread Steven A. Ridder
You are correct. the default behavior is to just send the matched digits to the pots dial-peer unless you use forward digits all command Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm not sure. I think I found the answer. I didn't understand the two stage dialling

mac address [7:49076]

2002-07-17 Thread MADMAN
Does anyone know if/how you can change to mac addresses of VLAN interfaces on a MSFC2? I tried using the mac-address x.x.x command but it changed the mac address on all the interfaces. I want to have a unique mac on each VLAN interface. Thanks in advance Dave -- David Madland CCIE# 2016

Modem on Aux [7:49077]

2002-07-17 Thread supernet
I've got a US Robatics modem on 2621 Aux port. When I dialed up to the router, I got connected to the modem but not router. I know the configuration is good. Do I have to do anything on the modem? I can reverse telnet to the modem. I heard that if I connect to 2621 Console port, I won't get

Re: bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread birdy
Dear priscilla Thanks for your reply :) Wellthe 10% packet loss happen at the peak time...and that can happen for a period of 3-4 hours No packet loss was observed during off peak hours. I rememeber reading something on a cisco article which states that WAN performance will worsen when it

RE: Voice jargon [7:49068]

2002-07-17 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
blitzlight wrote: Hi all, I'm currenty preparing for CIPTSS certification, and as I'm coming from data background, I find myself swimming in a foreign pool and start getting drowned with different voice codecs, standards, signalling etc. I should say the learning curve is really

gk_process Error decoding RAS Message...discarding [7:49080]

2002-07-17 Thread Reza
Hi Group I have a problem on my gatekeeper , I turned ras, h225 , gatekeeper debugs on and then I get this error message when my gateway sends a call to my gatekeeper gk_process Error decoding RAS Message...discarding I searched for the meaning of the message and I found : When a router is

Re: bandwidth question [7:49002]

2002-07-17 Thread birdy
Dear Phil Thanks for the reply...:) The below is from my router and it seems that both the tx and rx load is not over 90% utilised. reliability 255/255, txload 81/255, rxload 162/255 This reading is taken when my bandwidth usage is around 1.96Mbps. My pipe is only 2Mbps. At this point in

private addressing [7:49083]

2002-07-17 Thread birdy
Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network address Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private address or a public address ? Message Posted at:

OSPF Route Summary [7:49085]

2002-07-17 Thread John Brandis
G'Day All, A client has sent me a list of IP's that are to be used in a new global network. Our Global network will IP is 10.64.x.x . Now, for for each office, we will have two networks, for example, Paris is 10.64.4.0 through to 10.64.6.0 . The only exception is Sydney, where the client will

Re: private addressing [7:49083]

2002-07-17 Thread MADMAN
Public though it apparently hasn't been doled out: dmadlan horton:/aces/home/dmadlan $ whois 172.35.0.0 No match for 172.35.0.0. Dave birdy wrote: Can anyone tell me. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. That means that it can use 16 class B network

RE: Opinions on Cisco Interactive Mentor [7:49060]

2002-07-17 Thread Paul Jin
Which one is the BGP CIM? Is that the expert routing CIM? Depends on what you are trying to do. They are few labs and once you do it once or twice, that is it. It is ok for someone that does not have real routers. Or trying BGP labs for the first time and want someone to walk you through it.

RE: mpls vis a vis the routing switching tra [7:49048]

2002-07-17 Thread Paul Jin
For a week or so, the CCIE proctors from Cisco are answering ccie lab related questions at @!#$. You can double check your questions there. http://www.@!#$.com - Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49087t=49048

RE: private addressing [7:49083]

2002-07-17 Thread Dan Penn
Actually, it's 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255. So the answer is yes, 172.35.0.0 is from the public block. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of birdy Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: private addressing

Re: VPN with Cisco 806 [7:49034]

2002-07-17 Thread Dain Deutschman
Thanks for the advice guys...very helpful. Dain. Dain Deutschman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Everyone, VPN Question: I have a client with 16 small locations ( 2-8 nodes per location ) that may want to access a Windows Terminal Server at a central site

Exchange 5.5 Problem [7:49090]

2002-07-17 Thread Firesox
I have Exchange 5.5 running on Windows 2000 server. All clients are using Outlook 2000. For some reason users get this message when certain message comes in to their mailbox. The Microsoft Exchange Server received an Internet message that could not be processed. To view the original message

Re: Broadcasting and the all ones subnet [7:48996]

2002-07-17 Thread Wesley
Heya Priscilla, Thanks for the explaination. Is it safe to assume that Cisco routers do not perform an all subnets broadcast? I found something off Google that I would like to share with you guys. This is an excerpt from TCP/IP Tutorial by IBM. All-Subnets-Directed Broadcast Address If the

Re: OSPF Route Summary [7:49085]

2002-07-17 Thread Dain Deutschman
I assume that Sydney is the backbone area 0? 10.64.0.0/22 would summarize all subnets in the OSPF network in the backbone Sydney 10.64.0.0./22 Paris 10.64.0.4./23 -Do you mean 10.64.4.0/23? LA 10.64.0.6./23 ---Do you mean 10.64.6.0/23? NYC 10.64.0.8./23

RE: OSPF Route Summary [7:49085]

2002-07-17 Thread Roberts, Larry
Your superior looks right to me. If you use a /24 against the .4,.6 and .8, you would only have the .4,.6 and .8 available. With a /23 you would get .4.0(network)-.5.255(broadcast) at Paris. LA gets .6.0(network)-.7.255(broadcast) And NY would get .8.0(network)-.9.255(broadcast) You could use a

  1   2   >