On 7/30/07, Andy Dingfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, my motivation is that I want to use Eclipse on Linux to
develop both java and c++ apps, and want them to run on mac, Linux and
PC. I have seen multiple discussions in a variety of places that talk
about how to do this, some
Brandon (and everyone else reading this),
I fear you misunderstood something from my last message, when you said
CMake's level of Java support is a strategic risk. Eclipse isn't just
a cross-platform crowd, it's a cross-platform heavily Java crowd.
What I meant was that we need as good as
On 7/30/07, Andy Dingfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon (and everyone else reading this),
I fear you misunderstood something from my last message, when you said
CMake's level of Java support is a strategic risk. Eclipse isn't just
a cross-platform crowd, it's a cross-platform heavily
On 30.07.07 18:08:37, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/30/07, Andy Dingfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon (and everyone else reading this),
I fear you misunderstood something from my last message, when you said
CMake's level of Java support is a strategic risk. Eclipse isn't just
a
I personally think that the Eclipse CDT might be a good option to
explore instead of focusing on other smaller, less used IDEs.
The Eclipse userbase is huge and the CDT portion is growing with leaps
and bounds, especially in the embedded and cross platform areas.
It seems to me that the
On 7/29/07, Andy Dingfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that the Eclipse CDT might be a good option to
explore instead of focusing on other smaller, less used IDEs.
Well, yeah, like, duh.
Thoughts from any other Eclipse users out there?
But there's this funny thing about open
Brandon,
I hear what you are saying loud and clear, and agree pretty much with
what you are saying.
As you alluded to, my query was simply a way of finding out the current
state of things, and I very well my get my A into G and organize some
work around improving the integration between cmake
On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:54, Mike Jackson wrote:
...
I will throw my hat in the ring on this one.. Eclipse with CDT:
Available on Unix/Linux/OS X/Windows
Uses GNU Tool Chain by default
OpenSource
Updated Regularly
Uses Makefiles by default so basically CMake supports it.
We would be
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:47, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing
rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++
On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:47, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
As far as I can tell,
On 7/26/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von protein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
Probably not unless you write such a generator. The
Zitat von Olivier Delannoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/26/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von protein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
As far as I can tell, interest in Dev C++ has waned because its
development has gotten stale.
13 matches
Mail list logo