At 06:06 PM 03/28/2003 -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
What's unclear to me is who is behind this. Felten thinks it's content
providers trying for state-level DMCA; I think it's broadband ISPs who
are afraid of 802.11 hotspots.
It looked to me like it was the cable TV industry trying to ban
It would also outlaw pre-paid cell phones, that are anonymous
if you pay in cash and can be untraceable after a call. Not to
mention proxy servers. On the upside, it would ban spam ;-)
Cheers,
Ed Gerck
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html
Quoting:
Sidney Markowitz writes:
They both require that the use of such technologies be for
the purpose of committing a crime.
The Massachusetts law defines as a crime:
(b) Offense defined.--Any person commits an offense if he knowingly
(1) possesses, uses, manufactures, develops, assembles,
For the last three years, I've operated a mail alias,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], that publicly archives and forwards
to the government authorities announcements of the public
availability of cryptographic software. The idea
was that since current US export regulations require
notifying the government any
I've just read Declan's politech article sent out this morning,
referencing his full report at:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028-994667.html
I was shocked to see that Michigan has *already* passed such a law!
I've found the new law(s), and they basically outlaw my living in
Michigan starting
Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
expect that all US military communications, even trivial ones,
are strongly encrypted, given the ease of doing this.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:38:29PM -0500, reusch wrote:
| Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
| at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
|
| I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
| expect that all US military communications, even trivial
On the thread of voting machines, matters of trust and fraud come up,
never mind bugs and other errors...
There are other references on the web which I am sure some of our
viewers have seen...
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/
http://www.ecotalk.org/VotingSecurity.htm
reusch[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
expect that all US military communications, even trivial ones,
are
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, reusch wrote:
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
expect that all US military communications, even trivial ones,
Trivial ones are voice radio. Nontrivially to encrypt (mil people tend to
be conservative), unlike teletype (I've used NEMP-proof
For the last three years, I've operated a mail alias,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... It was
started on a whim, at the suggestion of someone on this
list, if I recall correctly.
That was me.
I think the openssl folks mention it and use it, so sending your posting
there is good idea.
Thanks for all the
At 7:38 PM -0500 3/30/03, reusch wrote:
Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
I showed this link to a friend who fixes helicopters for the
Army/Marines. He was incredulous at first, but then said, Oh, they
probably just
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:38:29PM -0500, reusch wrote:
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
expect that all US military communications, even trivial ones,
are strongly encrypted, given the ease of doing this. Someone,
more well informed, please reassure me that
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 17:33, Jurgen Botz wrote:
[Moderator's note: is using a NAT box intent to defraud a cable
modem provider? --Perry]
The cable modem provider and the DSL provider at their consumer
service level in my area both have explicit clauses in their AUP
prohibiting sharing of
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception.
1. Look for plaintext. This was rule #1 stated by Robert Morris
Sr. in his lecture to the annual Crypto conference after retiring as
NSA's chief scientist. You'd be amazed how much of it is floating
around out there, even in military
At 12:51 PM 3/31/03 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:38:29PM -0500, reusch wrote:
| Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
| at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
|
| I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
| expect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The real problem is that flaky
encrypted comms are a tactical problem so it is often
better to use clear comms when time is the issue. Not too
helpful to know what's about to happen if you can't do
anything about it anyway.
--
This is a
http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns3567
It's nice to see that the US military realizes the terrible possibilities
from tracking the movements of ordinary people (who happen to be soldiers
or with soldiers).
When will they get on the bandwagon demanding that person-tracking
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Peter Wayner wrote:
| He went on to talk about crypto as if it was something like fuel or
| food. He said, They probably loaded up 4 or 5 days of crypto at the
| beginning, but then they had to turn it off after the supply lines
| got muddled.
|
| So
reusch wrote:
Via the Cryptome, http://www.cryptome.org/, RU sure, look
at http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news082.htm.
I'm amazed at their claims of radio interception. One would
expect that all US military communications, even trivial ones,
are strongly encrypted, given the ease of
John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember, the cypherpunks ... secured any Web traffic
Credit where it's due. Netscape was responsible for this.
-Ekr
--
[Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rtfm.com/
Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
If You Want To Win An Election, Just Control The Voting Machines
by Thom Hartmann
[...]
Six years later Hagel ran again, this time against Democrat Charlie Matulka
in 2002, and won in a landslide. As his hagel.senate.gov website says, Hagel
was re-elected to his second
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 02:59:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am much more concerned about the
apparent lack of good IFF (missile batteries lighting up
the RAF plane that they then shot down; the USAF plane that
reacted to being lit up by firing at and destroying the
ground radar;
At 2:10 PM -0500 3/31/03, reusch wrote:
...
Nosing around on the same site, one finds
How military radio communications are intercepted
http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news071.htm
Searching for SINCGARS indicates that all US military radios have
encryption capabilities, which can be turned
While Googling for material on SINCGARS, I found an article about
crypto in the India/Pakistan conflict. Old style cryptanalysis isn't
dead yet:
http://www.tactical-link.com/india_pakistan.htm
Arnold Reinhold
-
The
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 23:42
To: John Gilmore
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Russia Intercepts US Military Communications?
John Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remember, the cypherpunks ... secured any Web traffic
Credit where it's due.
Well I am sure most of you would be amazed and/or flabbergasted with how the
crypto keys are handed out for the different avionics/communication
devices on a daily basis. You will know if you forgot one of them like when
you pass over a hawk missile sight at the edge of base, and they lock on and
to conceal or to assist another to conceal from any communication
service provider, or from any lawful authority, the existence or place
of origin or destination of any communication.
I agree with Peter. Now what are they going to with all that Postal mail
without return addresses? Who is
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:10:56PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000336.html
Quoting:
Here is one example of the far-reaching harmful effects of
these bills. Both bills would flatly ban the possession, sale,
or use of
At 6:09 PM -0800 3/31/03, dave wrote:
to conceal or to assist another to conceal from any communication
service provider, or from any lawful authority, the existence or place
of origin or destination of any communication.
However, this provision shouldn't interfere with NAT on a home network.
All
http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns3567
New Scientist
GPS phones confiscated from reporters in Iraq
15:26 31 March 03
Will Knight
Satellite phones with built-in Global Positioning System (GPS)
capabilities have been confiscated from journalists travelling with US
troops
31 matches
Mail list logo
