Seona Bellamy wrote:
http://www.dairyfarmers.com.au/df/ournews/latestnews/2007/07/25/from-rock---n-roll-to-rolling-hills
So here's the code that sets up those two columns for the date and the
text:
#date {
float: left;
margin-left: 20px;
font-weight: bold;
color:
Snadden Tim wrote:
Recently I needed to set a background image on body in order to create
full height faux columns. I found that if font size is set on body
that IE still uses the default font size to position the background
image. To get around it I ended up putting the background image on a
Peter Elias wrote:
http://www.virtualpooh.com/pn/index.php
here, there is a general ruleset for table, div
table, div {...} without a width setting.
But
http://www.fhcaweb.dreamhosters.com/index.php
here,
the table and the dynamenu table rules both apply a width of 90%.
The drop down is
Robert Tilley wrote:
The paragraph styling in this page displays correctly when the page's URL is
directly viewed.
There is just one rule
p { color: white; font-size: 1.2em; }
When visited from the drop-down menu, it displays in a smaller font and is
differently colored.
Why this
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
Chris Rahe wrote:
http://www.bremenhospital.org/testsite/pages/specialists.html
Specialities button:
IE is not able to determine the static position of an absolutely
positioned block. So, if you swap left: -999px to 'auto' on hover
Chris Rahe wrote:
...
Can anyone take a look at http://www.bremenhospital.org/testsite/
pages/specialists.html and see if they can figure out what I'm doing
wrong? ...
Specialities button:
IE is not able to determine the static position of an absolutely
positioned block. So, if you swap
Christian Kirchhoff wrote:
...
http://www.digitale-bibliothek.de/Maschinentechniker/METS2/index.htm
here, the slider is visible, its the other 2a link below that misses the
slider.
...
Anyway the slider does not appear in IE 6. Position and size are defined in
the html document:
Jason Ogle wrote:
...
You forgot to test in Opera, too. And what validation?
Now look what's happening to my tour dates and recent media columns.
Anybody with Safari be able to check this out and hook a brotha up
with the right (or better) way to do this?
Barney Carroll wrote:
Hello list,
I'm getting a nasty little déja-vu over a device on my site whereby a
javascript-powered pseudo-popup with unconstestably high x-index is
getting poluted by select elements in the form under it.
...
A select is a windowed object in IE7 [1] and resides
Shelman, Mark / SRC wrote:
Hello List,
At www.src.org http://www.src.org/ I am encountering an IE6
positioning problem that seems (?) to be in the Peek-a-boo family of
bugs. ...
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the bug on src.org
In IE6, the initial rendering matches that of FF2, and looks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'm having some issues with IE 6 displaying images on dynamically created DOM
elements. ...
.labelReq {
color: #000;
font-family: Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif;
font-size: 11px;
background: url(/icon_requiredField.gif) no-repeat center right;
Francesco (Sin City Creative) wrote:
...
http://newsite.omedix.com/
Safari 2 shows a color mismatch of some backgrounds.
http://www.satzansatz.de/alien/omedix.png
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
...
Is there a way to combine floated divs with absolute
positioned divs for layout, without having the page
behave erratically across several browsers? The pages
(both are live samples of the templates we work with)
in question are:
http://www.nj.com/news/
Joel D Canfield wrote:
... this
list's archives (where would those be, I wonder?) for more details.
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=SearchCssDiscussList
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
David Boddie wrote:
Hey everyone,
It's been a while since I posted. I'm having a weird problem with a
inline list menu I'm building. The last li item seems to have
something pushing it up about 2 pixels,...
You've already changed your test case. Here is a bug reduction. The li
itself is
Dan Craciun wrote:
I'm using Gallery 2.2 and the old slider theme. I'm trying to modify it
so it shows a shadow with the main img. (10 px shadow on the right and
bottom, gif created in photoshop).
For 3 hours now I can't convince the shadow div (umbra) to collapse
*and* keep it's alignment
Brian Walk wrote:
...
Using Firefox 2.0.0.6, go to
www.niu.edu/phys_plant/departments/maintenance.shtml and do a print
preview. You will notice that Firefox is dividing the page up into
three sections: the header, which only features the logo; the content
area, which cuts off some content
John Gribben wrote:
...
http://windows.pedrera.com/clients/tierney/bayerpmp/newsletterhtml/
At the bottom of the page, part of the final list item (Pest Control) is
weirdly duplicated.
...
Most probably it is related to the double html comments in your file.
Remove them. See PIE for a
brian wrote:
Ingo Chao wrote:
brian wrote:
That's not true. The part you've been missing is the sizingMethod
param to AlphaImageLoader() [1]. You need to scale it.
Yes, but you cannot stretch any image that is more complex. Stretching a
marguerite my look like a rose, though.
Who said
JGardner wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a drop down navigation - it looks/works correctly in
IE7 and Firefox, but not IE 6. I would appreciate any guidance to
fixing this. You can see the page here -
http://www.jgardnerdesigns.com/web-design-services.htm
Thanks, Jennifer
you have
David Laakso wrote:
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/sm-chg/
For example, the ul numeral b01/b should be red. And it is red in
both OS at 100%.
But Opera/Mac /does not retain the red color/ at 90% and below, or at
110% and up.
On this test page with the ul isolated there is no
The behavior is noticeable on margin-left + float: right too (which is
not the case for the doubled margin bug, or was it the other way
round?). And the resulting margin is positive if a negative margin is
used as a basis.
Strange thing.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
Mark Finney wrote:
http://www.helpusmarry.co.uk/jessie/editorial/
Cannot see the page in IE, I think its due to the self-enclosing script
tag you use.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
Mark Senff wrote:
I use a PC so I can't test it in Safari -- hopefully we will hear
that less and less now that the Windows version of Safari is pretty
much 99% the same as the Mac version. ;)
That's not correct; you can't test a Safari 2.0.4 issue with the Safari
3.0 beta
Seona Bellamy wrote:
http://www.subaru.com.au/about-subaru/subaru-advantage/ .
Got it. The topnav is followed by an empty clearing element.
Inserting a quick fix seems to solve the issue, at least on my local
testcase.
div style=clear: both;Hello List/div
div id=bannerswf style=overflow:
Elias Abunassar wrote:
Found an interesting, self-appointed CSS Working Group:
Hmm, I was not asked.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terry O'Leary wrote:
Hi all
Dont shout if this is not a CSS problem but a flash one as i'm a
little unsure. I have a flash banner that is L shaped and i have set
the background to transparent using wmode. The Div is have containing
the text nicely nestles in the bend of the L on IE7 and
Alan Chandler wrote:
...
In firefox I can make this overall area position itself under the header
and fill the rest of the browser window with the following css
#loginContent {
position:absolute;
top:140px;
left:0px;
bottom:0px;
width:100%;
Jeralyn Merideth wrote:
Hi group. I need more help! This project is quickly becoming the bain
of my existence! I don't know why, but the wrapper, is not acting like
a wrapper. Inside dreamweaver, when I click on the wrapper div, it's
just a couple pixels high and everything else if falling
Hi Mauricio,
Mauricio Samy Silva wrote:
Test case is here: http://www.maujorsite.com/temp/teste.html
When we open the 2nd and 3th level submenus the links left, right and bottom
borders
are missed in IE5.0 IE5.5 IE6 (don't test in IE7 until now).
If the submenu are closed and then
and then re-opens, bingo! the borders was
there!
From: Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mauricio Samy Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [css-d] List css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
1-) I've tried another attempt. Instead
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments that would help me improve this tool:
http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
Good test.
You might say that a relatively positioned element
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Hello.
The following site is behaving rather badly in Internet Explorer. I
wonder whether anybody has any suggestions as to how to get the
'splash' text correctly, or whether my current method of positioning
things is a bad one, etc.
Mark Senff wrote:
Hey all,
Here's one of those stupid problems again Let's say my DIV
structure is like this:
div id=mainBlock div id=menuBlockmenu goes here,
blablabla/div /div
For a specific reason, I want to use a PNG file with alpha
transparency as the background of the main
Christy Gurga wrote:
...
The site I'm working on: http://www.mtassisi.org
...
2) Background color not showing up on a Mac
My #content div has a white background, which isn't showing up in Safari or
FF for Mac. ...
It should not, because it does not contain it's floating #main and #side
Jenn Mears wrote:
...
http://www.bipster.com/beta/order_credit.html
Mainly, my issue is that the page's side navigation and content is
not showing up, just the top banner. This should be the path to the
CSS:
http://www.bipster.com/beta/order.css
...
top_banner /
side_nav /
Pete Harrison wrote:
I've taken over a simple design at http://www.squaremilemag.com/n3-index.asp
which has a couple of issues. I cannot see why there is a gap between the
main content area and the header2 red band across the page, and in IE6, the
sidebar menu overlaps the main content area
Ian Piper wrote:
...
http://www.rozone.co.uk/test/pages/pages/rozone_direct.php
...
#contentContainer needs a haslayout trigger.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Ware wrote:
I created a link class to have a background image on linked text
where needed:
a.checkbox {
background:url(/healthcare/_img/Pencil.gif) no-repeat 100% 50%;
padding-right:20px;
}
The above adds a checkbox to the right of the linked text, and it
Robert James wrote:
...
I'd like to position an element at the bottom of the screen. This is
easy, using position: fixed and bottom: ...px.
However, on screens higher than 600px, I'd like to fix it at 600px from
the top. That is, if the screen is shorter than 600px, push it to the
bottom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is weird, I've googled long time and I cannot find solution.
It happens only on IE6.
Sorry, but I cannot put online case right now, here is just the code.
Scenario 1:
You should see text on blue background of div #wrapper
...
style type=text/css
Sébastien FICHOT wrote:
Hello !
I would like that DIV #Reactions-Blog is displayed on the right, and
that his height not added in top of article title (IE). It is a
reltive positionned DIV, with extra Top and Left positions.
With FF, I have a more important problem, since the whole DIV
.
In my real case the troubling element was deep inside of DOM tree so
I've just moved the style selector to the first logical element up.
Cheers :)
Ingo Chao wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is weird, I've googled long time and I cannot find solution.
It happens only on IE6
Bruno Fassino wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 Ingo Chao wrote:
Good. In case someone else could veryfy this fix, I'd appreciate it.
@importing two stylesheets should be similar to having two
style-blocks, or shouldn't it?
This is what I see after some quick tests (as Georg said, these things
Eystein Alnaes wrote:
...
http://edb.episerverhotell.net/en/Bransjer/Handel-og-Industri/Minibanktjenester/
The dropdown under the Bransjer tab is unclickable on the part that should
be hovering over the div class=secton article. ...
In all IE, any element that has position:relative and
Hi,
Safari Webkit, Firefox 3b and Opera 9.5b render this test different:
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/opacity/
#stackA {
opacity: 0.66;
z-index: 2;
background: red;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
}
#stackA p {
position: relative;
Alan Gresley wrote:
Ingo Chao wrote:
Hi,
Safari Webkit, Firefox 3b and Opera 9.5b render this test
different:
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/opacity/ ... Screenshots:
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/opacity/webkit.png
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/opacity/fx.png
http
David Laakso wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I notice that the Holy Grail layout on A List Apart
(http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail) breaks in IE7 when the zoom
feature is used. The columns appear to shift horizontally as the zoom is
increased or decreased. This is a
Ingo Chao wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I notice that the Holy Grail layout on A List Apart
(http://www.alistapart.com/articles/holygrail) breaks in IE7 when the
zoom feature is used. The columns appear to shift horizontally as the
zoom is increased
Keno Multimedia wrote:
...
Could I please have a cross browser check and help with a horizontal
menu that won't drop down in IE !!
http://www.sun-safe.com.au/
http://www.sun-safe.com.au/default-stylesheet.css
http://www.sun-safe.com.au/IE.css
Marje Cannon wrote:
For some reason, the values within the form fields are too high in FF, but
not IE... does anyone have a clue why this is happening.
http://www.webdesignsarasota.com/contact.php
The stylesheet is located here
Rick Faircloth wrote:
...
Some developers are idealists who want to live in the world *they* develop as
far
as what browsers deserve attention and development time. The rest of us live
in
the real world.
I challenge any developer to ...
You can't expect them to explore IE only. It
Rick Faircloth wrote:
I consider philosophical questions about CSS design that
impact daily work just as legitimate as How do I make a font red?,
if not more so...
Does your philosophical attempt include to allege that some on this
list have a 'Taliban' mentality?
Ingo
--
Ben Fider wrote:
...
http://fiderweb.com/z/
looks like a sticky hover bug in IE7
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/pseudocss.html#stickyhover
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Kappers wrote:
...
I have a fieldset with a div inside it. The div is relative positioned. I
have a link inside the div that I want to absolute position to the top right
of the div. However, when I add position relative to the link, it vanishes
in IE6. There are NO other styles on the
Jesper Rønn-Jensen wrote:
I made two maps using CSS to position cities on a map
http://justaddwater.dk/2007/12/21/map-with-positions-in-css/
There is an IE6 bug in the lower example. Do you have any idea on
what's going on?
Isn't this a guillotine?
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
...
You can safely drop the '-moz-opacity'. Gecko browsers support the
'opacity' property since at least Firefox 1.0, if not earlier.
Nice side note.
Is it common consent to drop workarounds for Fx pre 0.9?
:)
Nancy E. Sosna Bohm wrote:
Often I find a pixel or two difference between FireFox and IE7, mostly due
to my use of borders and padding. I have been extensively using !ie at the
end of a style declaration to correct this in IE7. This is similar to the
!important used to target both FF and IE7,
Alan Gresley wrote:
...
Can someone let me in what is meant with !ie hack and point me to a
reference?
Ingo
It's an invalid hack [1] used to target IE7. Almost any word can be used
after ! in the important identifier.
[1] http://www.webdevout.net/css-hacks#unrecommended-important_ie
Bruno Fassino wrote:
... Unfortunately this shrink-to-fit effect can only be
obtained as a side effect of other properties ...
Interesting aspect.
Is there a need for properties that transport such a concept like
shrink-to-fit more directly, without these implications that properties
like
Brian Simmons wrote:
Can you all tell me why in Firefox this page is dropping the content down.
This is not happening in IE.
http://208.106.151.24/turner/
Collapsing margins (CSS2.1:8.3.1). The margin-top:87px of #menu
collapses with the adjoining vertical margins of h1, #header, #wrapper.
Chris Kavinsky wrote:
I'm running into a problem using a combination of suckerfish dropdown
menus and background image replacement w/ suckerfish dropdown menus.
In a nutshell, I have 2 sets of horizontal navigations using
suckerfish. The top is all text, the second is using image
replacement.
Martin Möller wrote:
Dear List,
i have a markup like this:
ul
li (left floating)
div class=previewa href=#img/a/div
div class=big-imageimg + text/div
/li
li
div class=previewa href=#img/a/div
div class=big-imageimg + text/div
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
head
title/title
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
meta name=author content=Ingo Chao /
style type=text/css
#wrapper
If the height is known, then establishing a line-box with the same
line-height=height should allow for vertical-aligning a descendant at
the bottom of the cell.
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/tablebottom.html
In theory. Practically, IE7 and lower would need a display:inline-block
hackery,
Jason Crosse wrote:
After a day of plenty of swearing, I seem to have found something
out that I think I should have known about before. I'm posting in
the hope it will help out some other hapless web developer and
prevent some nasty monitor-forehead interfacing.
For some reason, I know
jeffrey morin wrote:
Hi everyone,
Has anyone ever come across a case where Safari will actually read what is
in your IE conditional comments? i have never seen this before but am
getting that now. IE conditionals are being used to deliver certain jsp
files to certain versions but safari is
Rob freeman wrote:
Hi everyone, Im having a few problems in IE displaying a repeated
background (faux columns). also at the bottom of the page I have a
footer which doesnt display the background colour but has the working
links??
...
http://www.twistedjunkie.eclipse.co.uk/index009.html
Cheryl Amato wrote:
I have a page that needs to use the son of suckerfish dropdowns in 2
locations. I am also implementing the javascript that makes them
keyboard accessible. In FF and IE7, the 2nd set of drop downs work
although not from the keyboard. In IE6, they don't work at all. Can
Shanna Korby wrote:
The text in each link is at the top of the 'box'. How do I move the text
down without moving the a:focus background?
http://korbyimagery.com/ab/
Did not test it in IE, but setting a line-height of 30px on li or a
should move the text down, at least in Firefox.
Ingo
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Is there a way to start an ordered list at anything
other than 1?
I'm having a problem with QA type of page that
numbers the questions, but it also needs some blubs
between the questions. Kind of like below:
ol
liblahblah?br
fieldset
/li
need to
Arlen Walker wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008, at 3:50 AM, Lee Bettridge wrote:
Is their a better way of doing it than this ?
Oh great googily-moogily yes.
CSS
html { text-align: center; }
body { width: 800px; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; text-
align: left; }
(Why use a wrapper div
John Gribben wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make a sucker-fish-style drop-down menu (a hybrid that also
uses sprites for the top level items), but it's not working on IE6.
There seems to be a problem with the content div that sits immediately below
the menu. If I isolate the menu from
John Gribben wrote:
John Gribben wrote:
http://windows.pedrera.com/clients/greenbaum/nav.asp
There is a conceptual problem and a bug.
z-index does apply to positioned elements only. ...
From the inside:
The second level has z-index+position, but it is nested inside
positioned elements
Janie Hadsel wrote:
...
http://www.hadseldesign.com/projects.html .
Here's my problem, when you click on a link in either the main navigation or
the sidebar links FF places a faint dotted line around the link that extends
all the way across the page to the left side. It is intended as an
Here's a little bug in IE6 that is annoying me for a while now.
See
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/aposwrong.html
and
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/aposwrong.png
There is a 1px gap below the red block that is absolutely positioned
(bottom:0) inside its containing black block.
(In
Hi, thanks for taking the time.
Georg and Bruno, thanks for the analysis. This is an odd bug.
Bruno, your test case is great, thanks for the expression!
Usamah: Removing the font-size declaration did not fix the issue when
testing with different fonts and Browser-text-zoom settings. It depends
This is red in IE8
/*\*//*/
body {background:red !important}
/**/
http://www.stopdesign.com/examples/ie5mac-bpf/
IE8 is reading styles that were meant to be served to IE-mac.
tested with IE8 VPC image on XP 2
could someone please confirm?
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
Bruno Fassino wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is red in IE8
/*\*//*/ body {background:red !important} /**/
http://www.stopdesign.com/examples/ie5mac-bpf/
IE8 is reading styles that were meant to be served to IE-mac.
Yes, I see
Its cool to have the option to see a page live in one of the three
compatibility modes you choose (Quirks, Strict IE7, and Standards IE8)
when the developer tools are opened.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
So if I download the developer tools the below issue is re-solved?
The developer tool is already included. Its the last button to the
right, an blue arrow. It opens a window behind the actual IE8 window,
so you have to make room to see it. Then click on view|change
compatibility mode.
Alan Gresley wrote:
Ingo Chao wrote:
So if I download the developer tools the below issue is re-solved?
The developer tool is already included. Its the last button to the
right, an blue arrow. It opens a window behind the actual IE8 window,
so you have to make room to see it. Then click
Setting the X-UA-Compatible response header has some aspects I find
remarkable.
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=6
or
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=5
...
- content=IE=5 or content=IE=6 throws IE8b1 in quirksmode, even if
the document has a standards Doctype.
while
-
The html validator indicates a BOM in addition
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Sandy wrote:
or so i think.
http://accuray.com/
my flash menu is in an absolutely position div. in ie6 ONLY, when you
roll over products or patients, the menu is cut off at the bottom of
the drop down.
I tried fooling around with the other positioned elements or removing
them
Geoffrey Hoffman wrote:
Can someone point me to a solution for PNG transparency in IE 6 that works
on tiling background images? (If such as solution exists...)
There are solutions for PNG background-images, they none of them can
tile or position this image, for example
Geoffrey Hoffman wrote:
For anyone reading this post in the future, I thought I'd reply to my own
post.
For those of you who say it can't be done, at least in IE6, I have a
solution working... I haven't checked it in IE 5.5 or below.
What I discovered is that background-repeat:repeat-x
Geoffrey Hoffman wrote:
I don't know what you mean by complex alpha, but I have a 32-bit png (it's
just black fading to transparent, a 25x25px png, eg yes it is a a nice soft
8-bit alpha) that acts as a shadow on both sides of a site that has a table
floated in the center and the png tiles
I don't know if it has been reported before.
Both files just differ in the X-UA and the headline, see below
http://www.satzansatz.de/ie8/xua8.html
shows the generated content and the Conditional Comment for IE8
Correct
http://www.satzansatz.de/ie8/xua7.html
does not show the generated content,
Alex Robinson wrote:
http://www.satzansatz.de/ie8/xua7.html
does not show the generated content, but the Conditional Comment for
_IE8_
Is this expected? Even if the X-UA-Compatible is set to IE=7, the
conditional comment acts as if this is IE8?
I noticed this when I added conditional
Tony Crockford wrote:
http://www.hyperhappen.com/
is the site, can anyone see what the issue might be?
I wrote the css a long time ago and IE7 was quite happy with it, but
IE8 is cutting elements and backgrounds off. it seems to be not
wrapping floated elements properly, but I can't be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this exists in content
a href=www.somewhere.comlink/a
if there any way to make that link non-clickable only with css
You could replace the entire page by a large PNG.
Ingo
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
Matt wrote:
One of my sites in IE (6,7) sometimes doesn't load CSS - it seems it loads
just portions of it but not all. Refresh with SHIFT usually helps but not
always.
Whenever we update css we create a new path (version) in the URL for example
Pentasis wrote:
Soon FF3 will be out. As far as I know it will support the
display:inline-block property.
Opera and Safari already support it, and IE6 and IE7 support it partially
with a relatively simply workaround.
So, should we abandon the search for the holy grail for multi-column
Adi Palazova wrote:
Hello everyone,
I think that many of us have seen the IE bug with background images
on multi-line inline links. I’ve described three possible CSS
workarounds here:
http://adipalaz.awardspace.com/linksbg-en.html
These fixes are really simple and I hope they can help
Michael Adams wrote:
...
Then you have four factors involved which should be taken into account
in the following order: weight, origin, specificity, sort order. But you
didn't ask about them
CSS 2.1:6.4.1 -4 says:
if two declarations have the same weight, origin and specificity, the
Mark Finney wrote:
Dear List,
Not sure how I can force a container div to enclose the full width of its
child.
Can't explain the problem clearly, so visit the link to see an example of
the issue.
http://cathaytrade.co.uk/widercontent/
You could float the wrapper or apply
Ingo Chao wrote:
... Negative margins move the outer edge of an
element inwards, this can make an element move, since the surrounding
still touches the outer edge [1]. ...
[1] http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/companions.html
sorry.
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http
Sandy wrote:
I have this site which has a js nav. It's pretty simple, when you roll
over an LI, the nested UL is supposed to display. And in all browsers
except Safari, it does.
This isn't a JS problem because removing the JS and saying display:
block on the UL does not help, its still
Chris Akins wrote:
If I take out the overflow:hidden from the #container rule, then the top
looks fine, but the bottom of the page goes haywire.
Did not look into it, but if overflow:hidden is meant to contain floats
in these layouts (instead of literally cutting what is overflowing),
then
1 - 100 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
