Ray Dillinger wrote:
[...that he wasn't talking about anarchy...]
The only real difference is that the functions of government are
distributed instead of being vested in particular people.
Which is pretty near a definition of anarchy according to my anarchist
friends.
[...]
Bell's AP
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, James A. Donald wrote:
When I visited Cuba, I found that all the telephones accessible to an
ordinary cuban, or at least all the ones that I encountered, had a man with
a gun nearby, conspicuously visible to the person making the call, and in
one case someone with headphones
At 10:27 AM -0700 4/24/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(commenting on Aimee's words)
It sounds to me like you are suggesting gutting the threat models that
should be used during the design phase of any communication system. You
are implying that if there's a legal way of saying that something may
Tim mysteriously leaves out the part when he was targeted for radicalisation
by certain third-parties.
*only kidding* before I am accused of trying to trigger a raid.
You say tomatoe...they say tomhatoe. You say needs killin'...they say needs
raidin'...
~Aimee
Tim May wrote:
And I really
AF Wrote:
Further, I don't think individuals owe any obligation to the law as to
the participants, form, content or retention of private communications.
Recognizing that the law does not agree with you, that's a valid opinion.
I don't think that the law requires me to make all
John Young wrote:
Aimee Farr spun:
I spin, you lyre.
Finally, the law has an impressive track record, in stark contrast to
'crypto-anarchy.'
This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced steel shark cage,
'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is like
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Tim May wrote:
And I really did not get started on this path toward crypto anarchy
because I was _seeking_ anarchy as some sort of utopian fantasy. In
fact, I had largely moved away from politics by the mid-70s, and was
not very political in the 1987-88 period when I
At 6:16 PM -0400 4/24/01, Matthew Gaylor wrote:
From: Jon Lebkowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Wendy Grossman
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:56:22 -0600
Shameless plug: I'm interviewing Wendy Grossman in Inkwell.vue on the WELL.
You can read the interview at:
At 3:55 PM -0800 4/24/01, Raymond D. Mereniuk wrote:
On 24 Apr 2001, at 11:02, Ken Brown wrote:
You need phone numbers to buy train tickets? Why? Since when? The USA
may be a wonderful country but over here where we we employ
I believe in the original story the fellow bought a train from
Well, suffice it to say that there are a lot of clearly special cases.
And suffice it to say that if we drop probation, financial exchanges and
corporate topics and stick with conversations ( information exchanges )
between ordinary individuals all is well but keep pushing the technology
since
? aluger, in gentlemanly defense, wrote:
?? aluger, because he is a big damn hotshot showoff, wrote:
??? aluger, preemptively, in defense of his buddy, wrote:
At Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:08:17 -0700, Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1:11 PM -0500 4/24/01, Aimee Farr wrote:
Mike said, quoting
BTW, I need a gray travel consultant. Lemme know if anybody knows of one.
Will accept salt-and-pepper gray.
~Aimee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Tim May
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
At 5:20 PM -0700 4/24/01, David Honig wrote:
At 11:02 AM 4/24/01 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
and burn a million cows on pyres of
used tyres and railway sleepers (they are thinking of using napalm to
save money)
The chemicals in the materials you're using for your pyres are
poisoning the locals
Tim May concludes:
Those in other countries should not sit back and smirk. France,
Germany, and Japan are already far along in their march to statism.
Kanada is catching up.
And don't forget the dutch with their shiny new face iris scans embedded
within immigrant identity cards. of course
Choate:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Aimee Farr wrote:
First, the law can be used to the advantage of aforesaid 'technological
means,' often giving hints. For example, somewhat in the context of this
discussion, it seems possible to have electronic communication
that does not
imply
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:08:19PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced steel shark cage,
'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is like those
three sharks with memory in that Deep Blue Sea movie.)
Aimee, I like you, I really
Yep. Brands' book is out from MIT Press, so it's even accessible.
(Well, relatively accessible; I keep planning on finishing it RSN.)
For someone to ask on cypherpunks for pointers to basic crypto
concepts and ignoring reading lists is like someone posting to a
political mailing list and asking
No argument here. I recall a lot of this was in the '96 legislative
session, especially the summer. I have some articles on the topic
archived at www.eff.org/pub/Publications/Declan_McCullagh
-Declan
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:34:44AM +1000, Ralph Wallis wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 Apr 2001 at
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:43:20PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
From our perspective, it will show the foolishness of government
overreaction (ordering a million animals to be slaughtered and burned
with tires and old pressure-treated lumber railroad ties).
Good summary. Here's an ENS report:
At 09:08 AM 04/22/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
I haven't found Samuelson's textbook useful for any of the
interesting discussions of markets, black markets, offshore havens, ...
I used Samuelson's textbooks to study micro and macro in college.
*Terrible*! Badly written, verbose, not structured
Declan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:08:19PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced
steel shark cage,
'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is
like those
three sharks with memory in that Deep Blue Sea movie.)
On Tuesday, April 24, 2001, at 09:21 AM, Bill Stewart wrote:
Perhaps the field has changed since I was in college, but back then,
academic econometrics had the reputation of being dominated by
Marxists -
the more-Scientific Socialists who understood that if you want a
centrally planned
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:27:10PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
If this becomes law, it will be a case of pure thoughtcrime. No victims,
no aggression against another person, no actual people. Just
thoughtcrime.
It is law, actually. Passed in 1996, with the Bruce Taylors of the
world testifying in
23 matches
Mail list logo
