On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Do, 10 Jun 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
This behavior is expected; the encoding file H exists in
(currently) cmap-adobe-japan1 package, so installing the package
should generate a correct PDF file.
Thanks, you
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Dear Yoshino-san,
On Sa, 06 Mär 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
Note that the patch to restore DVIPDFMx.cnf proposed in the first post
is still needed to look for cmap files.
I have prepared a temporary
On Do, 10 Jun 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
This behavior is expected; the encoding file H exists in
(currently) cmap-adobe-japan1 package, so installing the package
should generate a correct PDF file.
Thanks, you are right, I see the pdf file with テスト, thanks.
BTW, why does xpdf not show
Dear Yoshino-san,
On Sa, 06 Mär 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
Note that the patch to restore DVIPDFMx.cnf proposed in the first post
is still needed to look for cmap files.
I have prepared a temporary tex-common package with that change,
but your test.dvi still does not work ... After
おんばんは 香田さん
今まで五ヶ月日本にすんでいます、でも香田さんと合ったことがありません。
いつ私たちは 日本のTeXのかいぎをしますか。
On Mi, 10 Mär 2010, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
There is a project called ptexlive in Japan which extends
many standards TeX tools (like updmap etc.) to support fonts
for pTeX, which implys one can't use updmap for pTeX fonts.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:35:59 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
今まで五ヶ月日本にすんでいます、でも香田さんと合ったことがありません。
いつ私たちは 日本のTeXのかいぎをしますか。
I welcome you at any time but I'm a bit busy to visit
your location.
Strange enough, there is no Japan TUG so it is very rare
to see a conference on TeX (but it was held in
Hi Norbert
2010/3/8 Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at:
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
I was just thinking how we could use the current Debian infrastructure
such as dh_installtex instead of directly modifying the dvipdfmx file.
It depends. I don't know enough about dvipdfmx
Hi
On 10 March 2010 03:15, Atsuhito Kohda ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:52:30 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
(snip)
I was just thinking how we could use the current Debian infrastructure
Hi Danai and all,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:35:28 +0100, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
On 10 March 2010 03:15, Atsuhito Kohda ko...@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp wrote:
Some comments from my side.
Basically it is safe to consider that fonts for pTeX are
NOT fonts for standard (or normal) TeX so it is not
Hi all,
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:52:30 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
(snip)
I was just thinking how we could use the current Debian infrastructure
such as dh_installtex instead of directly modifying the dvipdfmx file.
(snip)
Of
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
I am not entirely convinced that this patch needs to be added to the
TeXlive Debian package; I would rather put it in the pTeX JIS font
package, since that package provides the rml and gbm fonts.
But that package would need to change a file of
Hi Norbert
2010/3/8 Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at:
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
I am not entirely convinced that this patch needs to be added to the
TeXlive Debian package; I would rather put it in the pTeX JIS font
package, since that package provides the rml and gbm
On Mo, 08 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
Did it create a different/new problem, Danai?
The patch by Yoshihito that you just applied works, yes. No worries,
it doesn't add any new problems.
That is good. Ok, I still not understand what Yoshihito-san did with
that control@ magic
Hi Yoshihito
On 5 March 2010 18:12, YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
We should find a good solution for that. The problem is that dvipdfmx
is now the default program and is even used as dvipdfm,
Dear Yoshihito-san,
On Sa, 06 Mär 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
texlive-base-2009/texmf/fonts/map/dvipdfmx/cid-x.map 2010-03-05
03:22:51.0 +0900
+@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
+ rmlv V Ryumin-Light
+ gbmv V GothicBBB-Medium
+
++rml-jis H Ryumin-Light
++gbm-jis H GothicBBB-Medium
Hi
On 3 March 2010 17:30, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Mi, 03 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
It took me a while to understand the issue here, but I agree with
Norbert: the current patch causes unnecessary inconveniences for other
users, including CJK users who use the CJK
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
severity 570901 important
thanks
Hi Yoshihito-san,
On Mi, 03 Mär 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
severity 570901 grave
Well, that is discussable, did you check the definition of grave in
the reference:
Hi
It took me a while to understand the issue here, but I agree with
Norbert: the current patch causes unnecessary inconveniences for other
users, including CJK users who use the CJK package (latex-cjk-*
Debian packages).
BR
--
Danai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Danai,
actully I was hoping that you listen and answer here ...
On Mi, 03 Mär 2010, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
It took me a while to understand the issue here, but I agree with
Norbert: the current patch causes unnecessary inconveniences for other
users, including CJK users who use the CJK
severity 570901 grave
thanks
Hello,
I hope this bug be fixed before release of squeeze, or many CJK people will
have incovenience. It does not work unless manually modifying configuration
files.
Regards,
--
YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 570901 important
thanks
Hi Yoshihito-san,
On Mi, 03 Mär 2010, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote:
severity 570901 grave
Well, that is discussable, did you check the definition of grave in
the reference:
makes the package in question unusable or mostly so,
or causes data loss,
21 matches
Mail list logo
