Jonathan Dowland j...@debian.org schrieb:
Moritz, what's the security team's opinion on ffmpeg being reintroduced
as a binary package (providing /usr/bin/ffmpeg) only?
Doesn't make much of a difference, since it still exposes all the same decoders
and demuxers through the ffmpeg binary.
On Fri, Feb 14 2014, p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But how to make the decision whether libav or FFmpeg is better for jessie?
Seems like getting the two upstreams to collaborate and merge the two
forks is the way to go.
actually, there is an
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:14 -0300, Niv Sardi wrote:
actually, there is an on-going effort to port libav's features and
bugfixes into the ffmpeg project.
Good to hear. So the remaining thing is to convince the libav folks to
contribute to ffmpeg again and change the ffmpeg community in ways
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what I
called insane in the RFP and where I expect additional probems due
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-14 09:06:34)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is
what I called insane in the RFP and
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org schrieb:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what I
called insane in the RFP and where I expect additional probems due
to:
Also, I expect the
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
But we still try to minimise such cases as much as possible. And for
libav/ffmpeg this simply isn't managable at all due to the huge stream
of security issues trickling in. We need definitely need to pick one
solution only.
And
Quoting Stephan Seitz (2014-02-14 13:32:41)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
But we still try to minimise such cases as much as possible. And for
libav/ffmpeg this simply isn't managable at all due to the huge
stream of security issues trickling in. We need
+++ Stephan Seitz [2014-02-14 13:32 +0100]:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:03:02PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
But we still try to minimise such cases as much as possible. And for
libav/ffmpeg this simply isn't managable at all due to the huge stream
of security issues trickling in. We need
Moritz Mühlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org schrieb:
If they're now diverging separate source bases, this isn't really
different than the other cases where upstreams have forked and for
various reasons we've found uses for both implementations.
But we still try to
Hi Adrian,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which option
(libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best for jessie
based on the information that is available today?
Honestly, I don't
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which option
(libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best for jessie
based on the information that is
Moritz, what's the security team's opinion on ffmpeg being reintroduced
as a binary package (providing /usr/bin/ffmpeg) only?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which option
(libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best for jessie
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But how to make the decision whether libav or FFmpeg is better for jessie?
Seems like getting the two upstreams to collaborate and merge the two
forks is the way to go.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Feb 15, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
But how to make the decision whether libav or FFmpeg is better for jessie?
Seems like getting the two upstreams to collaborate and merge the two
forks is the way to go.
A fork exists exactly because the upstream developers do not want to
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-14 09:06:34)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/13/2014 04:48 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
After ***forcing*** users to use libav instead of ffmpeg in debian
therefore making it to stuck with outdated fork istead of rapidly
developing original it's too late to talk about freedom..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-02-13 14:43, The Wanderer wrote:
I was not aware that the decision of whether to go with libav or
with FFmpeg had involved any consideration at all of which one was
better, only consideration of which one had someone available who
was
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
After ***forcing*** users to use libav instead of ffmpeg in debian
therefore making it to stuck with outdated fork istead of rapidly
developing original it's too late to talk about freedom..
Gosh, we are not forcing you
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 20:37:47)
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which
option (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best
for jessie based on the information that is available today?
It will certainly be best for Jessie to have a library
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 20:37:47)
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which
option (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best
for jessie based on the information that is
Hi!
Do you have a good idea how to avoid all the problems of mixing both
libraries while also creating a sufficient usage of the FFmpeg libraries
in a way that both libraries can be in testing at the same time, or are
you just setting a hurdle intended to be impossible to pass for
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 22:40:23)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 20:37:47)
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which
option (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best
for
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hi!
Do you have a good idea how to avoid all the problems of mixing both
libraries while also creating a sufficient usage of the FFmpeg libraries
in a way that both libraries can be in testing at the same time, or are
you
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what
I called insane in the RFP and where I expect additional probems
due to:
Also, I expect the security team would be unhappy to have to fix
security issues twice.
--
bye,
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what I
called insane in the RFP and where I expect additional probems due
to:
Also, I expect the security team would be unhappy to have to
27 matches
Mail list logo
