Dear Debian Legal Team,
Thank you very much for your help. I've read each email in this
thread with care, and at last can consider this issue closed.
On 9 June 2017 at 02:27, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 06:52 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'd prefer
On 06/08/2017 06:52 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
I'd prefer not to, because Message-ID reveals what I consider private
information (IP address or client hostname) to an unbounded audience,
and I believe that this is a greater privacy violation than the
lintian warning against downloading a
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:24:11AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>
> > I pushed updates here:
> >
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git/tree/debian/COPYING.emails
>
> That's a good record. Better than most Debian
Nicholas D Steeves writes:
> I pushed updates here:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git/tree/debian/COPYING.emails
That's a good record. Better than most Debian packages, I'd say :-)
Can you put the Message-ID field for each message in the header
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:54:57PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > Do you agree that my mail exchange as found in the sympathy package is
> > a good example of how to ask these questions, and how to record the
> > answers ?
>
> Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright
> in adopted package"):
> > Are there messages in that file that could be removed? I typically
> > try to get a single
Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in
adopted package"):
> Are there messages in that file that could be removed? I typically try
> to get a single message from the copyright holder, that contains an
> explicit and unambiguous grant of
Ian Jackson writes:
> Do you agree that my mail exchange as found in the sympathy package is
> a good example of how to ask these questions, and how to record the
> answers ?
Ian Jackson writes:
> I meant this, which I provided
Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in
adopted package"):
> As to how to record the information, I would expect to find it in the
> ‘debian/copyright’ file, and I don't see what you're referring to at
> <URL:https://sources.debian.
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 at 02:16:10 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This benefit IMO far outweighs the risk that at some point someone
> will abuse our goodwill to make Debian-format source packages out of
> proprietary software. No-one, not even evil people, would want to do
> that.
As a consultant
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright
> in adopted package"):
> > The principle is to consider what a hypothetical future package
> > maintainer, or FTP master or reci
Ben Finney writes ("Re: unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright in
adopted package"):
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> > I would encourage everyone who does packaging to explictly licence
> > your debian/* with some very permi
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> Nicholas D Steeves writes ("unknown license for package/debian/* in
> d/copyright in adopted package"):
> > I'm adopting src:muse-el, and the old d/copyright file does not
> > state which license th
Nicholas D Steeves writes ("unknown license for package/debian/* in d/copyright
in adopted package"):
> I'm adopting src:muse-el, and the old d/copyright file does not state
> which license the old debian/* uses.
This kind of thing is quite annoying. I would encourage e
Dear Debian Legal Team,
I'm adopting src:muse-el, and the old d/copyright file does not state
which license the old debian/* uses. I used "comm" to see what
remained after transitioning the package to use dh-elpa, current
debhelper and compat, et al, and only the contributions of Michael
Olson
15 matches
Mail list logo