On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:39, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:35:12 +0100, Tom Badran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
penned:
I also have heard that OO.org is working on Reveal Codes for their
next release -- which, if true, has me drooling. That's the biggest
thing I miss about
Sridhar == Sridhar M A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally the best thing for writing LaTeX docs is
vim/emacs :-)
Emacs + auctex is good too...
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:00:22AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:32:43AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:33:31PM +0200, JG wrote:
So you could try Lyx (available in woody/contrib, or
testing/unstable/main), which is an almost
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:58:42AM -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote:
Sridhar == Sridhar M A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally the best thing for writing LaTeX docs is
vim/emacs :-)
Emacs + auctex is good too...
If you are not averse to it, try vim +
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work with a very small non-profit and over the years they have been
keeping documents in various formats (most often MS Word or
WordPerfect). From these documents they generate printed booklets (so
postscript output good), and the documents are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I work with a very small non-profit and over the years they have
been keeping documents in various formats I'd like to move to
text-based documents so we are not dependent on a specific product
(like Word). So I'm looking for suggestions.
Aah, the document
I suggest OpenOffice:
+ available for Linux and Windows platforms
+ easy to learn, many things are similar to Word (but some advanced
features are IMHO better than Word's)
+ its own format is XML based, can also read and write Word, RTF and
other formats
+ new version can generate PDF
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:08:12 -0700 (PDT), Stephen A. Witt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
I don't have any experience with DocBook or XSLT, but I do nearly
everything in LaTeX and I love it. From LaTex source you can pretty
much automatically generate html and pdf as well as postscript. I do
think
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:20:16 +0200, Stephen A. Witt wrote:
Another option might be OpenOffice. Essentially its Word without the
proprietary-ness of Word.
And these days, it even has a 'direct to pdf' exporter.
--
Stephen Patterson http://patter.mine.nu/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] remove SPAM to reply
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 18:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work with a very small non-profit and over the years they have been
keeping documents in various formats (most often MS Word or
WordPerfect). From these documents they generate printed booklets
(so postscript output good), and the
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 20:28, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I believe there are WYSIWYG editors for laTeX (or however you capitalize
it.) I don't recall their names offhand, though.
LyX is very good, and the QT interface for it is very nice. Ive just done a
full 30 page report with it and
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:35:12 +0100, Tom Badran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
penned:
I also have heard that OO.org is working on Reveal Codes for their
next release -- which, if true, has me drooling. That's the biggest
thing I miss about WordPerfect.
No idea what these are so cant comment ;)
I highly reccomend Lyx. It is a very easy to learn, intuitive,
powerful editor that generates LaTeX output. It can also export to
HTML via latex2html, for which it has built in support. I've also
seen it say something about text output, but I can't vouch for that
since I haven't used it.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:33:31PM +0200, JG wrote:
So you could try Lyx (available in woody/contrib, or
testing/unstable/main), which is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX
that runs under the X Window System.
Inspired by your post, I downloaded and installed
lyx_1.1.6fix4-2_i386.deb,
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 14:37, Stephen Patterson wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:20:16 +0200, Stephen A. Witt wrote:
Another option might be OpenOffice. Essentially its Word without the
proprietary-ness of Word.
And these days, it even has a 'direct to pdf' exporter.
All of the modules can
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work with a very small non-profit and over the years they have been
keeping documents in various formats (most often MS Word or
WordPerfect). From these documents they generate printed booklets (so
postscript output good), and the
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:32:43AM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:33:31PM +0200, JG wrote:
So you could try Lyx (available in woody/contrib, or
testing/unstable/main), which is an almost WYSIWYG-frontend for LaTeX
that runs under the X Window System.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:08:12PM -0700, Stephen A. Witt wrote:
LaTeX would
probably only work for you if you had some guru type person who set up
templates that the other people could use so they didn't have to become
too knowledgeable about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:28:02PM +, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
I believe there are WYSIWYG editors for laTeX (or however you capitalize
it.) I don't recall their names offhand, though.
LaTeX, TeTeX, CrApTeX...they're all StUdLyCaPeD.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:35:12PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
LyX is very good, and the QT interface for it is very nice.
It would be nice if KOffice did TeX. You'd think it would be the
obvious format choice. KOffice is lighter weight, faster, and
20 matches
Mail list logo
