Hi,
I think the consensus is it is not acceptable
Then let mine be the only opposing voice.
I think because of Declude's weight features, Challenge/Response would be a
very valuable and very usable option.
Any messages with LOW weight pass. This addresses your concern of breaking
I guess what I'm trying to say is that I like the concept I also
agree with all of con's that have presented. It would be nice if there
was someway we could automate the whitelist.
What about this spin? What if Declude took the email address that the
internal user was sending to and put it
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude
I guess what I'm trying to say is that I like the concept I also
agree with all of con's that have presented. It would be nice if there
was someway we could
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude
Hi,
I think the consensus is it is not acceptable
Then let mine be the only opposing voice.
I
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude
That is what AutoWhite for Declude does.
However, that does not lesson any of the problems with C/R
For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude
Is it true that AutoWhite only works
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude
That is what AutoWhite for Declude does.
However, that does not lesson any of the problems with C/R software.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices
