PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
Thanks for the reply Nick.
No, not at all. I thought I did.
global.cfg contents:
COMBO filter C:\IMail\Declude\lists\combo.txt x 0 0
combo.txt file
seperating the test names?
Travis
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
Travis,
The one thing to keep in mind
Hi Travis -
That looks correct - and is how I do mine. One suggestion though - the
first line in the filter should be
SKIPIFWEIGHTweight that is slightly above your delete weight
The idea is here is to prevent a filter from firing needlessly, Along
that same idea - filters execute in the
email you can see the testing order.
-Nick
Travis
- Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
Hi Travis -
That looks correct - and is how I
I want to use combo filtering with testsfailed to further
punish emails that fail two or more of the reliable tests.
Travis,
I do a similar thing for a long time now and I'm very happy with the
following solution:
1.) create a new filter test COMBO-IP4R:
COMBO-IP4R filter
all 3 tests. No ?
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
Travis,
Not exactly. The TESTSFAILED string is a space separated string of
tests
: Sunday, October 23, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS SPAMCOP
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS SBL
TESTSFAILED 0 CONTAINS XBL
Explain the theory of this to me, please.
stop testing if the test
That is one test.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
I want to use combo filtering with testsfailed to further punish emails
Come on is my poker face that bad?
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] found something new to me
I would wager that is a filter he has
Travis -
You are not slow - this is some what confusing until you get the hang of it.
Are you all set? Do you understand now how it works?
-Nick
Travis Sullivan wrote:
I think I got it... I am slow, I know :)
global.cfg contents:
COMBO filter C:\IMail\Declude\lists\combo.txt x 0 0
Thanks for the reply Nick.
No, not at all. I thought I did.
global.cfg contents:
COMBO filter C:\IMail\Declude\lists\combo.txt x 0 0
combo.txt file contents:
TESTSFAILED 10 CONTAINS testname1-testname2
So, any test I want to combo script simply take the testname and
Hi Travis -
I think most folks use combo's - the idea is to further punish an email
that fails more than one reliable test [like sniffer and xbl or ???.].
This is where Declude really shines - being able to punish emails
further based on previous test results. - you do not have to score
Or you can use combos to limit the damage.
As an example, being on a DUL list / having a dynamic IP isn't a pure
indicator of spam. Someone can be on several of these lists and be legit. So
I'll enforce a max weight of 100 on all the DUL tests.
13 matches
Mail list logo
