First and foremost, congratulations Scott. You have earned the benefits that
come with a deal like this.
Many of my feelings echo those of Matt. You have done an outstanding job of
providing the flexibility and support for a set of excellent products that
has become increasingly scarce in today's
How do we know which interim is the latest?
I am currently running: v1.79i1
Regards,
Steinar Rasch
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: 11. april 2004 19:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I truly believe that this will be beneficial for everyone.
To state the obvious, there's always a battle in such arrangements between
the bottom line and satisfying expectations, and over time, the bottom
line always wins when you are playing with someone else's money.
That is definitely true.
How do we know which interim is the latest?
You actually don't need to know. You should normally only run an interim
if there is a specific need for it (such as a new feature or bug fix). So
I would recommend continuing with the interim that you are running now.
The one main exception is
1- ONLYSENDIFFORGING, and/or Autoforge replace sender by [forged]
This is in the suggestion database, and something that will likely be added.
2- %REVDNS% for %REMOTEIP% in declude.virus
This too is in the suggestion database, and will likely be added.
3-a way to send notifications based on the
Scott,
As a brand new member of the list and trying to learn the SPAM ropes
quickly I have been very impressed with the product and your support.
(Do you ever sleep? :)
I wish you the best of luck with Barry and Charles and congratulations
to you for building the company large enough to interest
Hi,
Just a suggestion: Rather then talking to them in the third person, it may
be reassuring if they were to introduce themselves to their customers
and personally address some of the points that list members have raised.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent
Just to add my $.02, I think I have to agree with Matt on 100% of his
message.
Especially...
M I hope that Barry and Charles both understand that Declude is not an
M inexpensive product and I'm sure that everyone around here expects a
Almost $2500 for add-ons is more than the base product.
All,
MailMage is seeking beta testers for our latest utility, MilterSink.
MilterSink is a highly configurable DLL event sink for Microsoft's IIS
SMTP service (a.k.a. MS SMTP) allowing for the integration of
command-line content scanners.
Originally designed to wrap our SPAMC32
Hi Scott-
Allow me to add my congratulations to the others you've received. You have
worked hard for this and you deserve whatever reward came to you as a result
of this deal.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
Hey, Kevin.
I do get the usual web page when I go to the CBL homepage you listed. I see
that the last update was March-30-2004 when they stated that they had
harvested out a lot of their old records.
I stopped using CBL on Jan-05-2004, though, because the SpamHaus XBL is a
superset of CBL,
Rick, no, the BODY text filtering searches everywhere, including inside
binary attachments.
Your best bet is to assign those nasty words with very little weight, don't
use very short words, and/or try to match a phrase instead, or use trailing
punctuation.
For example, I've found that although
Nifty!
I'm on the current interim without issue, and it's great to have that log
line at LOGLEVEL MED.
Thanks a bunch,
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Andrew,
You can save an extra lookup by using the combined address:
XBLip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.480
SBLip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.2200
Declude will only do one lookup per unique address/DNSBL and then apply
the result codes
Yea I understand that but I am catching words like p*nis and c*nt that
should have a heavy weight and for some reason it seems to be only PDF file
attachments. Just thought it would be possible to skip that portion of the
body due to the formating.
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North
I'm running Imail 8.10 with Declude 1.79 and I've had to restart the Imail
services a couple of times since the upgrade. Should I be running a
different version of declude?
thanks,
Larry Craddock
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
Hi Scott,
It seems that the link used for downloading the Interim releases doesn't
work anymore since the site has been updated. Can you send me the new
link, please.
Thanks,
Adrian
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
...or a trailing space. Base64 encoding doesn't use punctuation or
spaces. Your list would never hit base64 if all you did was add a
space, and that would probably hit more often than with punctuation.
Staying away from words 5 characters or less also helps because for each
additional
This may be duplicated ... if so, please ignore. I'm running Imail 8.1 and
Declude 1.79 and have had to restart Imail services a couple of times since
upgrading. Should I be running a different version of Declude?
thanks,
Larry Craddock
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL
I stopped using CBL on Jan-05-2004, though, because the
SpamHaus XBL is a superset of CBL, e.g.:
Looking at the individual results on my server CBL has had 32% of correct
votes (Between 04/01/04 and 04/11/04)
In the same timerange XBL has had 30% of correct votes. (really a superset?)
The
Thanks Matt, the trailing space trick will do...
I have the luxury of being tough on specific words so I am :-)
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 2:21
Please continue with the great support and answering my newbie
questions, I hope to soon learn enough to ask better questions :.
Don't worry, I will continue answering questions here (and on the IMail
Forum). :)
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail:
Just a suggestion: Rather then talking to them in the third person, it may
be reassuring if they were to introduce themselves to their customers
and personally address some of the points that list members have raised.
I've passed this on to Barry, and suggested that he join the list --
It seems that the link used for downloading the Interim releases doesn't
work anymore since the site has been updated. Can you send me the new
link, please.
We're working on that one.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution
On 12 Apr 2004 at 14:44, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Don't worry, I will continue answering questions here (and on the
IMail Forum). :)
If Chucky Barry don't work you promise you won't leave us correct?
-Nick Hayer
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
First and foremost congratulations.
Thank you. :)
Second -- mta connection: POSTFIX! If I could do
at the gateway servers what I do at the mailbox
server, there would be NO load at the mailbox
server.
We're looking into it. :)
Third -- The website looks very corporate, while
that's not a bad
Have you already started considering which other MTA's you will try to
integrate with?
No decisions have been made yet, but it looks like a gateway product (which
would be compatible with all SMTP servers) may be the way that we go.
I want to suggest Xmail Server (http://www.xmailserver.org).
I have never seen a cheap addin for MS SMTP, even simple ones.
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/msg17599.html
I suppose it depends on what you mean by add-in, but...
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf
I saw that when you posted it (also know as when it hit my mailbox), after
I posted mine. And I stand corrected.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:49 PM
Is CBL still running. I have nto been able to get to their web site for a
few days now???
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
I know transition pains are happening but I cannot access the country
dat file at
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat
or
http://www.declude.com/179/all_list.dat
Plus I noticed that the release notes do not have anything about the
newest beta.
The top of both Manual pages need the
OK it is working vor me now. Must have been some kind of DNS cache issue or
something. I flushed my DNS cache and it is working now.
Sorry about the subject line in the last post.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Bilbee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004
I know transition pains are happening but I cannot access the country
dat file at
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat
or
http://www.declude.com/179/all_list.dat
Sorry about that -- they should be at
http://www.declude.com/version/beta/all_list.dat shortly. Note that the
new URLs
From the IMGATE list:
http://surbl.org/
Interesting concept. Anyone here tried it?
Ive been planning to upgrade SA on my personal acct here and have a few
hours to kill on Tues so I think I'm going to add it and see how well it
does.
Any chance this can be made to work with Declude?
All,
While no one has protested, it's possible that the beta invitation
might have looked like a commercial plug to some of you. We initially
thought of indicating otherwise outright, but decided that it that
might look as if _we_ had protested too much. grin
For the record, this
Has anyone responded to this.
It is a great program... I wish I had a VB program to do the work.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview
Scott,
We have switched
We have switched email systems and will no longer be supporting
SpamReview. It is written in VB6.0. You have any suggestions of
someone that we can turn it over to?
All right, hand it over. I'm in too deep to get out now. :)
--Sandy
Sanford
I responded on the IMGate list, as well. We have been running if for a few
days on our SA gateways, and it has been working great, flagging lots of
spam.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 8:37 PM
Subject:
Any chance this can be made to work with Declude?
Well, SpamAssassin can. :)
Another innocent plug...
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin
Innocent? ;). We are already using spamchk as an external test. I
would like to avoid adding spamassassin as well. I was thinking more
along the lines of integrating the test into the declude core...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
We are already using spamchk as an external test. I would like to
avoid adding spamassassin as well.
Alrighty--but _very_ different animals. Everything SpamChk does can be
done with SA rules, AFAIK (not that those rules have been precisely
reproduced as yet). And SA's hit rate with
Scott's already said that they would be looking at integrating the
functionality into Declude JunkMail:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17502.html
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 9:22 PM
Subject:
We did. Waiting to see what Tom decides...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Samarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview
Has anyone responded to this.
It is a great program... I wish I
Scott,
While I respect open source, I think the greater market opportunity for
a for profit gateway product is on Windows based servers using MS SMTP.
For one, it would probably allow your current base of IMail users to
make use of it on the same server if they had a port forwarding firewall
Andrew,
That's the first I heard about that zone including the Blitzed tests.
Their information is confusing as it appears on their site. It may be
that there is no 127.0.0.5 result and the dash means that the values
lie between 4 and 6 or 2 and 6. I believe that with just SBL and CBL
data,
45 matches
Mail list logo
