You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online
which will take care of this.
There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at
http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of the
ALLRECIPS filter not working properly.
At 11:00 AM 5/13/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote:
You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim release online
which will take care of this.
There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at
http://www.declude.com/version/interim . It takes care of the issue of
the ALLRECIPS filter not working
Scott,
Is this just for the ALLRECIPS bug, or does this also cover some other
more recent and less serious ones like the combination subjects and the
addition of the NOTCONTAINS functionality?
Thanks,
Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote:
You are correct -- I'll see if I can get a new interim
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20040512A.html
and Symantec's patch:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/security/Content/2004.05.12.ht
ml
which can be downloaded and installed via LiveUpdate.
Unlike the BlackIce worm, there is no report of malware in the wild but
the
If you are using outlook 2003 you can add the reg key
HKLU Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Options\Mail
READASPLAIN
REG_DWORD
0x1
All html mail will be show as text.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: 13 May
What happened to this valuable site? I get a server not found?
It crashed last night -- it's back up now, though.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable
I am unable to receive from @fiberlinkinc.com if the message is sent
from them and is new. However, if I send a message to @fiberlinkinc.com
and they Reply to the message I sent, then I am able to receive from
them. Therefore only on Replied messages am I able to receive mail from
this company.
Open the message (not preview) and then right click in the message body to
access the context menu.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Temporary restraining order against SpamCop reversed:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040512/sfw083_1.html
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:20 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop
Maybe if
There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at
:)
Scott... Now was that real hard :) ...
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Don't poke the bear, Kami.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS CONTAINS END not ending?
There is a new interim release 1.79i7 at
:)
Scott... Now
Title: Message
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5210796.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed
Quote:
They were wrong, and they were annoying, so now they've
been stopped.
With a new version of Symantec's SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) e-mail
security product, the antivirus company is trying to
Don't poke the bear, Kami.
But don't you know, Kami likes living on the edge.
;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Title: Message
It is a start.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:56 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
Just so people on this list are aware, I'm going to be away next week.
What, Scott taking time off? Unheard of! What is this world coming to?
;-)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
I am unable to receive from @fiberlinkinc.com if the message is sent
from them and is new. However, if I send a message to
@fiberlinkinc.com and they Reply to the message I sent, then I am
able to receive from them. Therefore only on Replied messages am I
able to receive
Scott,
I've been thinking about this for a while as a way to increase spam
detection and do things that are otherwise more difficult to do, and
then the other day I found that MailPolice was actually promoting their
RHSBL's for use on both the Mail From and the reverse DNS entry, and
now they
At 03:38 PM 5/13/2004, Matt wrote:
Scott,
I've been thinking about this for a while as a way to increase spam
detection and do things that are otherwise more difficult to do, and then
the other day I found that MailPolice was actually promoting their RHSBL's
for use on both the Mail From and
Is there any shot of you enabling a different type of test built to do RHS
lookups from the reverse DNS value?
Actually, you can use something like:
BULK-REVDNS dnsbl %REVDNS%.bulk.rhs.mailpolice.com* x
0
-Scott
---
Currently, to the best of my knowledge, 'rhsbl' tests in Declude only
work on the Mail From and not the reverse DNS value. I'm interested in
the reverse DNS value to be added.
BTW, there are a couple of additional tests that MailPolice added at
the end of April that weren't on that list:
On 13 May 2004 at 16:57, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Scott,
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on this..]
-Nick Hayer
At 04:01 PM 5/13/2004, Matt wrote:
Currently, to the best of my knowledge, 'rhsbl' tests in Declude only work
on the Mail From and not the reverse DNS value. I'm interested in the
reverse DNS value to be added.
Aha... I figured it was something obvious...
-Russ
---
[This E-mail scanned for
That would be awesome if it really does work. I'll give it a try this
evening! Am I also to assume that this will work with the %HELO% as
well? That would rock :)
Just a note of caution to others, if you use MailPolice Bulk on the Mail
From, and you try this technique, you probably don't
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on this..]
That is correct.
ip4r will take the IP address that the E-mail came from,
Scott,
I think that beats the 8 minute feature request :)
Thanks again,
Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote:
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I
On 13 May 2004 at 17:16, R. Scott Perry wrote:
kool - thanks!
-Nick
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on
So in the global we'd have:
First the actual tests with no value for failure
MAILPOLICE-BULK-REVDNS dnsbl %REVDNS%.bulkk.rhs.mailpolice.com * 0 0
MAILPOLICE, etc.
Then the Filter (Using the example construct below) with a weight
MAILPOLICE filter X:\imail\declude\MailPolice.txt x 10 0
Is that
Cross post from Imail list:
We set up a domain (IMGate / Declude / Imail 8.11) at an IP Number.
We want it to accept email ONLY from white listed senders using Imail's
anti-spam feature so the customer can maintain the white list.
Has anyone done this? Does anyone have any ideas how to do it?
Cross post from Imail list:
We set up a domain (IMGate / Declude / Imail 8.11) at an IP Number.
We want it to accept email ONLY from white listed senders using Imail's
anti-spam feature so the customer can maintain the white list.
Has anyone done this? Does anyone have any ideas how to do it?
Here's a working config for MailPolice's dynamic test (PPP/DSL/cable)
that test's both the reverse DNS entry and the HELO entry (zombie
spamware often uses the reverse DNS entry for the HELO).
MAILPOLICE-DYNA-REVDNSdnsbl
%REVDNS%.dynamic.rhs.mailpolice.com127.0.0.200
That would be awesome if it really does work. I'll give it a try this
evening! Am I also to assume that this will work with the %HELO% as
well? That would rock :)
Yes, it will also work with %HELO%. :)
You can also use %MAILFROMBL%, which turns [EMAIL PROTECTED] into
user.example.com, for
R. Scott Perry wrote:
You can also use %MAILFROMBL%, which turns [EMAIL PROTECTED] into
user.example.com, for spam databases that work on the full E-mail
address rather than just the domain.
You know Scott, that was on my list of things to ask for but I was
holding back :) What a bunch of
My declude logs has the following error on most messages coming in
Invalid XINHEADER: X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.
My global.cfg XINHEADER appears
XINHEADER X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
(www.declude.com) for spam.
XINHEADER
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be awesome if it really does work. I'll give it a try this
evening! Am I also to assume that this will work with the %HELO% as
well? That would rock :)
Yes, it will also work with %HELO%. :)
You can also
My declude logs has the following error on most messages coming in
Invalid XINHEADER: X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.
XINHEADER X-Note - Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.
If you change that line to:
XINHEADER X-Note: Total spam weight of this
You can also use %MAILFROMBL%, which turns [EMAIL PROTECTED] into
user.example.com, for spam databases that work on the full E-mail address
rather than just the domain.
Scott, are there any such lists that use the full e-mail address that you
know of? These are some nice additional features.
Cool - thanks for your quick response. Enjoy your time away'
P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2004 12:13 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Invalid XINHEADER: error
My
Hello All -
Here is the situation.
I am unable to receive from @fiberlinkinc.com if the message is sent
from them and is new. However, if I send a message to @fiberlinkinc.com
and they Reply to the message I sent, then I am able to receive from
them. Therefore only on Replied messages am I
38 matches
Mail list logo
