[Declude.JunkMail] manual install of 4x

2006-08-23 Thread Nick Hayer

Is there a way to do this without the wizard?

Thanks for any info

-Nick


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-24 Thread Markus Gufler



As I can remember the latest "release" was from 07/23/2003. 
(yes 6 months ago)

Normaly we've downloaded only releas versions because the 
time between beta-tests and releases was relative short.But after the date 
above there was only betas and"interims". In the meantime there was a lot 
of news, discussions, changes and new spam fighting tecniques in this 
communitiybut none of them found the way to a release or the manual. 
On the other side spammers hasn't stopped to improve their sending tecniques, 
and has also begun to actively fight antispam sources (IP 
blacklists...)

Some weeks ago I paid the Declude SA fee, in the hope that 
soon will going on something. In the last six months I've posted a lot of 
suggestions, that in part was repeated from other subscribers later. 
For example:

  
  Check ifMAILFROM, EHLO, COUNTRY,... are nearly the same (I'm not 
  sure if already existant tests like HEURISTICS, take care of 
  this)
  
  ConfigurableHOLD action to move hold messages into different file 
  system folders.
  
  New COPYSMD action to look what's happen nearly under the own hold 
  threeshold, without breaking the delivery of legit messages. This should help 
  us to improve filter settings and avoid FP's
  
  Dynamically disabling of ressource intensive tests (like decoding, 
  external tests, large filter files, ...) based on the average cpu usage. This 
  not to run great part only with the half tests. Such a feature will allow us 
  to use much larger and complexer tests (like reg.expressions) then now without 
  having any problem durring peaks.
  
  Holding messages between 100 and 120% of the hold weight and re-test 
  them 15 or 30 minutes later on IP blacklists. If positive HOLD, if negative 
  REQUEUE
  
  Extra points for certain combinations of positive test 
  results.
  
  Optional time-based basic weight: So Mailservers with a clear defined 
  business/free timecan add a slight basic weight between 24 and 06 o 
  clock.
At the moment we usethe latestbeta but I 
stopped going to interims because I fear that then shortly we will have 
"beta-interims" and so on. SKIPIFWEIGHT, SPF and Co. are interesting new 
tecniques and I hope they will be shortly available in a release 
version.

I personaly prefer 1+1+1+1+1.+1

then 1+1+1... 
+5. +7...+2 


Paying a SA it's ok. But waiting for a new release for over 
6 months it's not so good. Ok it's not so bad as paying the IMail SA and 
receiving a v8 with nearly no noticeable new functionality. At the moment the 
only thing that will bring me to v8 is the need of declude's SMTPAUTH 
whitelisting.

Markus



  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin 
  BilbeeSent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:31 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  Manual
  
  I 
  think this is the best idea. This also give the admin that wants to or needs 
  to use the new features/bug fixes can and they understand their functionality. 
  This also gives the admin the ability to decide wether using the beta is worth 
  the hassle of possible bugs in features they are not currently ready to use. 
  but they can understand the new features that are in the beta with out 
  spending valuable time trolling the archives for possible outdate information 
  on the beta features.
  
  Scott how does this suggestion sound? A seperate manpage just for 
  the beta features Who cares if it does not look 
  pretty
  
  
  Kevin Bilbee
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
paulSent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:20 PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
Manual
I'll add my .02 worth to this 
discussion:

What I feel would be the best as a 
user:

1: Maybe instead of 1.76 betato 1.77 
beta, it should've been 1.76 Release, with an update to the manual about the 
new features of 1.76. 

2: Betas should have a page devoted to the new 
features with a disclaimer "These may not be in the next release - use at 
your own risk" That way, those that don't use the betas and wait for an 
actual release get what they want, and beta users get what they want as 
well.

Paul


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-24 Thread Matt Robertson
Markus, 

Good ideas you have there.  If I may comment briefly:

Dynamic disabling of resource-intensive tests would be an absolute
godsend.  Since I have enabled filtering I went from a server that had
gobs of extra overhead to one that is taxed and often redlines both
processors.  A load-smart system would be wonderful.

Holding and retesting and possibly requeueing:  Same thing.  Great idea.


No clue whether either is reasonably feasible.


 Matt Robertson   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 MSB Designs, Inc.  http://mysecretbase.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread jcochran
 Seems that there is a lot of chatter on the mailing list right now
 with tests etc that are not in the manual. I am curious will a new
 manual be released, or does anyone have any good explanations of some
 of these tests on their sites?
 
 The general rule of thumb is that the manual is updated to include new
 tests (and other features) whenever a released version comes out.  For
 betas (and interim releases), the features are discussed on the list.

Scott, for what it's worth, our Declude maintenance is up for renewal, 
and one of the questions I got asked was when there would be an 
updated printed manual that our less-experienced admins could 
understand.  Don't worry, the maintenance will definitely get paid, but 
now one of my tasks in my free time is to write an admin manual for 
our staff for Declude's products.

Food for thought as some/many of the features of Declude are 
becoming more regularly available from competitors and even 
Ipswitch.

Jeff
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread R. Scott Perry

Scott, for what it's worth, our Declude maintenance is up for renewal,
and one of the questions I got asked was when there would be an
updated printed manual that our less-experienced admins could
understand.  Don't worry, the maintenance will definitely get paid, but
now one of my tasks in my free time is to write an admin manual for
our staff for Declude's products.
Thanks for pointing this out.  A major overhaul to the manual by a 
technical writer is something that has been on the to do list for some time.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I agree that a manual is greatly needed. the value of all the new tests is
greatly diminished if there is not adequate documentation.

Searching through the archives and reading the discussions my be a good
thing to do if you are having trouble understanding the manual but to search
the archives to learn the features in the first place is prohibitive for
anyone who is performing multiple functions.

Once you release your next version I would suggest taking the time to create
a comprehensive manual. that will be more value to your customers than new
features.

If they do not know how to implement the current features then new features
are not going to be of any value either.

For the people that can spend the time and monitor the group full time and
experiment with new features when they are in beta I commend you. But not
all of us have the time to do that.

WE NEED A MANUAL TO QUICKLY AND EFFICITENTLY IMPLEMENT DECLUDES FEATURES.

If you document the usage of the new features while you are creating them
you would save yourself and your customers a lot of time.

Make the documentation part of your development cycle If you hire a
technical writer they are going to require it, so start it now, make the
usage notes available, it will save us all time and aggravation.

Kevin Bilbee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
 Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:07 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual



 Scott, for what it's worth, our Declude maintenance is up for renewal,
 and one of the questions I got asked was when there would be an
 updated printed manual that our less-experienced admins could
 understand.  Don't worry, the maintenance will definitely get paid, but
 now one of my tasks in my free time is to write an admin manual for
 our staff for Declude's products.

 Thanks for pointing this out.  A major overhaul to the manual by a
 technical writer is something that has been on the to do list
 for some time.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Ken Hirosumi
I agreebetter documentation...please!
- Original Message - 
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual


 I agree that a manual is greatly needed. the value of all the new tests is
 greatly diminished if there is not adequate documentation.

 Searching through the archives and reading the discussions my be a good
 thing to do if you are having trouble understanding the manual but to
search
 the archives to learn the features in the first place is prohibitive for
 anyone who is performing multiple functions.

 Once you release your next version I would suggest taking the time to
create
 a comprehensive manual. that will be more value to your customers than new
 features.

 If they do not know how to implement the current features then new
features
 are not going to be of any value either.

 For the people that can spend the time and monitor the group full time and
 experiment with new features when they are in beta I commend you. But not
 all of us have the time to do that.

 WE NEED A MANUAL TO QUICKLY AND EFFICITENTLY IMPLEMENT DECLUDES FEATURES.

 If you document the usage of the new features while you are creating them
 you would save yourself and your customers a lot of time.

 Make the documentation part of your development cycle If you hire a
 technical writer they are going to require it, so start it now, make the
 usage notes available, it will save us all time and aggravation.

 Kevin Bilbee

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
  Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 7:07 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual
 
 
 
  Scott, for what it's worth, our Declude maintenance is up for renewal,
  and one of the questions I got asked was when there would be an
  updated printed manual that our less-experienced admins could
  understand.  Don't worry, the maintenance will definitely get paid, but
  now one of my tasks in my free time is to write an admin manual for
  our staff for Declude's products.
 
  Thanks for pointing this out.  A major overhaul to the manual by a
  technical writer is something that has been on the to do list
  for some time.
 
  -Scott
  ---
  Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
  Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
  vulnerability detection.
  Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by The Calsoft Anti-Virus Scanner]




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by The Calsoft Anti-Virus Scanner]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Mike K
I have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated manual.

If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as he does
explaining to the list how features work, the manual would be current.

Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy software
but for a paid product with stable features it's unacceptable.

Mike



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread R. Scott Perry

I have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated manual.

If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as he does
explaining to the list how features work, the manual would be current.
Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy software
but for a paid product with stable features it's unacceptable.
There seem to be two main issues with the manual.

[1] It needs an overhaul by a technical writer.
[2] It does not include all the features that are available in the latest 
beta, and

#1 is something that has been an issue for some time.  We actually did look 
for a technical writer a while back, but there was a snag that prevented it 
from being completed.  We are definitely planning on addressing this.

As far as #2 goes, unfortunately, if we add beta features to the manual, 
there are several problems.  First, customers are going to get frustrated 
that they cannot use features shown in the manual (which would cost us more 
for support, too).  Second, we would have to make many changes to the 
manual as beta features are altered.  Third, I'm sure that if we were to 
add beta features to the manual, a lot of people would then expect them for 
interim releases.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread nrmathew
Keep it up guys and you'll be forced to wait for a full release to get some of these new features that add such extreme functionality to this product. If you don't like the way Scott does this, only use the latest full release with features covered in the manual. My $.02.N. Mathews[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: "Mike K" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 01/23/2004 02:50PMSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ManualI have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated manual.If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as he doesexplaining to the list how features work, the manual would be current.Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy softwarebut for a paid product with stable features it's unacceptable.Mike---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Mike K
Scott:

Your abilities as a writer are fine. I have seem many of your explanations
on use of features and for most I think they would suffice. They just need
to be put in the online manual at the same time you post a message to the
list.

I agree that beta features should not be in the main manual but could be
listed in a separate change.log file or in a beta/interim release file.

Mike

- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual



 I have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated manual.
 
 If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as he
does
 explaining to the list how features work, the manual would be current.
 
 Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy software
 but for a paid product with stable features it's unacceptable.

 There seem to be two main issues with the manual.

 [1] It needs an overhaul by a technical writer.
 [2] It does not include all the features that are available in the latest
 beta, and

 #1 is something that has been an issue for some time.  We actually did
look
 for a technical writer a while back, but there was a snag that prevented
it
 from being completed.  We are definitely planning on addressing this.

 As far as #2 goes, unfortunately, if we add beta features to the manual,
 there are several problems.  First, customers are going to get frustrated
 that they cannot use features shown in the manual (which would cost us
more
 for support, too).  Second, we would have to make many changes to the
 manual as beta features are altered.  Third, I'm sure that if we were to
 add beta features to the manual, a lot of people would then expect them
for
 interim releases.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Matt Robertson
DITTO!

The manual is completely updated right now, unless you have volunteered yourself for 
the beta program. :-)



--
---
 Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Russ Uhte \(Lists\)
At 03:36 PM 1/23/2004, Mike K wrote:
Scott:

Your abilities as a writer are fine. I have seem many of your explanations
on use of features and for most I think they would suffice. They just need
to be put in the online manual at the same time you post a message to the
list.
I agree that beta features should not be in the main manual but could be
listed in a separate change.log file or in a beta/interim release file.
I agree with this completely.  Just a simple change.log file that has the 
skeleton for the added test, and maybe just a brief definition, would be 
more than sufficient.  I would imagine that Scott and his boys (and 
possibly girls.. :) probably keep some type of log like this anyways.  But 
definitely keep this stuff out of the main manual.

My .02.

-Russ 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Matt




I think the beta/interim features debate has been done recently,
however there are two different things that this effects, first, more
info about what these things do, and eventually converging these things
into the manual (they're not all there in final release format).
Second, and more importantly, bug fixes need to be announced. I've
spent time researching things, trying to document them appropriately in
order to not waste anyone's time, only to find that the issue was fixed
in a more recent interim release. For those that have issues with
crashes and other serious matters, the announcement of such things is
critical and should be done proactively.

I will side with Scott about not announcing new interim functionality
outside of this list until it is in final release format because such
things always cause a lot of questions and that's a bit
counterproductive, but after they hit Beta, they should be documented
somewhere, and after a release, they should make it to the manual, even
the little things that you can only find in the release notes with one
line of text. But bug fixes of any sort should be announced, maybe to
an announcement list for those of us that want to sign up.

Since I monitor this list closely, I'm very much ahead of the curve,
though not completely, and for those that don't read every message
here, they lose out on a lot of things.

Matt



Mike K wrote:

  Scott:

Your abilities as a writer are fine. I have seem many of your explanations
on use of features and for most I think they would suffice. They just need
to be put in the online manual at the same time you post a message to the
list.

I agree that beta features should not be in the main manual but could be
listed in a separate change.log file or in a beta/interim release file.

Mike

- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual


  
  

  I have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated manual.

If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as he
  

  
  does
  
  

  explaining to the list how features work, the manual would be current.

Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy software
but for a paid product with stable features it's unacceptable.
  

There seem to be two main issues with the manual.

[1] It needs an overhaul by a technical writer.
[2] It does not include all the features that are available in the latest
beta, and

#1 is something that has been an issue for some time.  We actually did

  
  look
  
  
for a technical writer a while back, but there was a snag that prevented

  
  it
  
  
from being completed.  We are definitely planning on addressing this.

As far as #2 goes, unfortunately, if we add beta features to the manual,
there are several problems.  First, customers are going to get frustrated
that they cannot use features shown in the manual (which would cost us

  
  more
  
  
for support, too).  Second, we would have to make many changes to the
manual as beta features are altered.  Third, I'm sure that if we were to
add beta features to the manual, a lot of people would then expect them

  
  for
  
  
interim releases.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

  
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
  
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



  
  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  


-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott,

A better manual would be nice. I grumble when I see you changed it 
and cannot find where *BUT* if creating a new one takes away from 
your literal instant tech support, advice on OT subjects, I can live 
with the system.  

From my perspective isn't fair for folks that want new features daily 
like me to also ask for a spiffy manual. I feel it has to be one or 
the other and for that reason no complaints at all on my end. Great 
job!

-Nick Hayer


Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Keep it up guys and you'll be forced to wait for a full release to get
 some of these new features that add such extreme functionality to this
 product. If you don't like the way Scott does this, only use the
 latest full release with features covered in the manual. My $.02.
 
 N. Mathews
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: Mike K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 01/23/2004 02:50PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual
 
 I have not renewed my Junkmail SA due to the lack of an updated
 manual.
 
 If Scott would spend the same amount of time updating the manul as
 he does explaining to the list how features work, the manual would
 be current.
 
 Monitoring and researching list archives is fine for free or diy
 software but for a paid product with stable features it's
 unacceptable.
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the 
 Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The
 archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Matt




Maybe beta's should be by invitation/request only, and distributed only
to that group like a normal beta program? At the same time, bug fixes
can be applied to the last release, as well as the most recent beta, or
only to the beta's if that's all that is affected? It's a bit more
work to maintain two different sets of code in this way, but it keeps
the bugs relating to full releases from requiring you to upgrade to a
beta interim release. This would also cut down dramatically on the
overhead of releasing betas to the general public and having to deal
with the potential pitfalls of this (i.e. too much discussion).

Matt



paul wrote:

  
  
  
  
  I'll add my .02 worth to this
discussion:
  
  What I feel would be the best as a
user:
  
  1: Maybe instead of 1.76 betato
1.77 beta, it should've been 1.76 Release, with an update to the manual
about the new features of 1.76. 
  
  2: Betas should have a page devoted
to the new features with a disclaimer "These may not be in the next
release - use at your own risk" That way, those that don't use the
betas and wait for an actual release get what they want, and beta users
get what they want as well.
  
  Paul


-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=




RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message



I'm all in favour 
of the manual being sync'ed with the releases. That's a 
no-brainer.

Beta support 
handling is a bone of contention, and I'd rather that support maintenance of 
those featuresnot interfere with the stellar support we already get from 
Declude.

Therefore, I 
suggest that:

1) Create a new 
mailing list for Declude.JunkMail.Beta that those who live on the bleeding edge 
can join. Cross-posting to Declude.JunkMail and Declude.Virus is 
discouraged. Announcements of features would be done 
there.

2) As suggested 
already, simple documentation of new features under testing beprovided, 
e.g. sample usage and obvious gotchas, rather than the support/beta list getting 
clogged with people discovering a beta feature and asking how to use 
it.

3) Tracking 
what's in the Release and what's in the Beta then makes it irrelevant what's 
ina given Interim. Declude could then e-mail out a "new release 
announcement" to the customer base (that'd be us). A lot of traffic in 
this support list is based on administrators who are quite far behind but are 
seeing "new" tests discussed and want to get up to speed.

4) Perhaps: 
prefix the Beta feature names with BETA, e.g. BETAHIDETESTS, BETASPFPASS; the 
onus is then on we the mail administrators to do search and replace when we 
implement the Release version...? Valuable or pointless? Strict or 
customer-abusive?Judgingbythediscussion 
today,somewould prefer the clarity... but then, I only deal with one 
global.cfg and one $default$.junkmail so my judgement is 
limited.

Andrew.

  
  -Original Message-From: Matt 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:34 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] ManualMaybe beta's should be by 
  invitation/request only, and distributed only to that group like a normal beta 
  program? At the same time, bug fixes can be applied to the last release, 
  as well as the most recent beta, or only to the beta's if that's all that is 
  affected? It's a bit more work to maintain two different sets of code in 
  this way, but it keeps the bugs relating to full releases from requiring you 
  to upgrade to a beta interim release. This would also cut down 
  dramatically on the overhead of releasing betas to the general public and 
  having to deal with the potential pitfalls of this (i.e. too much 
  discussion).Mattpaul wrote:
  



I'll add my .02 worth to this 
discussion:

What I feel would be the best as a 
user:

1: Maybe instead of 1.76 betato 1.77 
beta, it should've been 1.76 Release, with an update to the manual about the 
new features of 1.76. 

2: Betas should have a page devoted to the new 
features with a disclaimer "These may not be in the next release - use at 
your own risk" That way, those that don't use the betas and wait for an 
actual release get what they want, and beta users get what they want as 
well.

Paul-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Kevin Bilbee



I 
think this is the best idea. This also give the admin that wants to or needs to 
use the new features/bug fixes can and they understand their functionality. This 
also gives the admin the ability to decide wether using the beta is worth the 
hassle of possible bugs in features they are not currently ready to use. but 
they can understand the new features that are in the beta with out spending 
valuable time trolling the archives for possible outdate information on the beta 
features.

Scott 
how does this suggestion sound? A seperate manpage just for the beta 
features Who cares if it does not look pretty


Kevin 
Bilbee

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  paulSent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:20 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  Manual
  I'll add my .02 worth to this 
  discussion:
  
  What I feel would be the best as a 
  user:
  
  1: Maybe instead of 1.76 betato 1.77 beta, 
  it should've been 1.76 Release, with an update to the manual about the new 
  features of 1.76. 
  
  2: Betas should have a page devoted to the new 
  features with a disclaimer "These may not be in the next release - use at your 
  own risk" That way, those that don't use the betas and wait for an actual 
  release get what they want, and beta users get what they want as 
  well.
  
  Paul


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Todd Holt
Title: Message









I agree with this approach. It would separate the BETA users from the
curious RELEASE users (who probably should wait for the release).





Todd Holt 
Xidix Technologies, Inc 
Las Vegas, NV USA 
www.xidix.com 
702.319.4349 







-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004
2:16 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Manual





I'm all in favour of the manual being
sync'ed with the releases. That's a no-brainer.











Beta support handling is a bone of
contention, and I'd rather that support maintenance of those featuresnot
interfere with the stellar support we already get from Declude.











Therefore, I suggest that:











1) Create a new mailing list for
Declude.JunkMail.Beta that those who live on the bleeding edge can join.
Cross-posting to Declude.JunkMail and Declude.Virus is discouraged.
Announcements of features would be done there.











2) As suggested already, simple
documentation of new features under testing beprovided, e.g. sample usage
and obvious gotchas, rather than the support/beta list getting clogged with
people discovering a beta feature and asking how to use it.











3) Tracking what's in the Release and
what's in the Beta then makes it irrelevant what's ina given
Interim. Declude could then e-mail out a new release
announcement to the customer base (that'd be us). A lot of traffic
in this support list is based on administrators who are quite far behind but
are seeing new tests discussed and want to get up to speed.











4) Perhaps: prefix the Beta feature names
with BETA, e.g. BETAHIDETESTS, BETASPFPASS; the onus is then on we the mail
administrators to do search and replace when we implement the Release
version...? Valuable or pointless? Strict or
customer-abusive?Judgingbythediscussion
today,somewould prefer the clarity... but then, I only deal with
one global.cfg and one $default$.junkmail so my judgement is limited.











Andrew.





-Original
Message-
From: Matt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004
1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Manual

Maybe beta's should be by invitation/request only, and
distributed only to that group like a normal beta program? At the same
time, bug fixes can be applied to the last release, as well as the most recent
beta, or only to the beta's if that's all that is affected? It's a bit
more work to maintain two different sets of code in this way, but it keeps the
bugs relating to full releases from requiring you to upgrade to a beta interim
release. This would also cut down dramatically on the overhead of
releasing betas to the general public and having to deal with the potential
pitfalls of this (i.e. too much discussion).

Matt



paul wrote:





I'll add my .02 worth to this discussion:











What I feel would be the best as a user:











1: Maybe instead of 1.76 betato 1.77 beta, it
should've been 1.76 Release, with an update to the manual about the new
features of 1.76. 











2: Betas should have a page devoted to the new
features with a disclaimer These may not be in the next release - use at
your own risk That way, those that don't use the betas and wait for an
actual release get what they want, and beta users get what they want as well.











Paul







-- =MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.http://www.mailpure.com/software/=










Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Dave Doherty
Scott-

I'll cast my vote for this approach.

Just a simple beta-only html page on your website. Contents: What's in each
interim release, a one-line explanation, and a .config file and/or .junkmail
file example would be fine with me. Once we know what's in the release, we
can search this list for details. That would have the added benefit of
getting the users hooked into earlier-adopters' experiences with each test
before they try it on their own.

Even niftier, a huge convenience, and no big deal to execute: A link from
the test's name to the list archive search page.

-d


- Original Message - 
From: Mike K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual


 Scott:

 Your abilities as a writer are fine. I have seem many of your explanations
 on use of features and for most I think they would suffice. They just need
 to be put in the online manual at the same time you post a message to the
 list.

 I agree that beta features should not be in the main manual but could be
 listed in a separate change.log file or in a beta/interim release file.

 Mike


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-22 Thread Darryl Koster
Scott,

I have been away for some time and have been trying to get caught up on the
declude list (its the most active list I have).

Seems that there is a lot of chatter on the mailing list right now with
tests etc that are not in the manual. I am curious will a new manual be
released, or does anyone have any good explanations of some of these tests
on their sites?

Hope someone can help.

Darryl Koster

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry

Seems that there is a lot of chatter on the mailing list right now with
tests etc that are not in the manual. I am curious will a new manual be
released, or does anyone have any good explanations of some of these tests
on their sites?
The general rule of thumb is that the manual is updated to include new 
tests (and other features) whenever a released version comes out.  For 
betas (and interim releases), the features are discussed on the list.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2003-06-30 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
 How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
 December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
 harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
 on a feature.

That is because there is no new release version yet.

As Scott has stated, the manual only gets updated with release versions, as
some items in betas never make it or are changed before release.

John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2002-04-01 Thread Todd Holt

www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm

Todd

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Douglas Hardison
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual


Where might I find a copy of the JunkMail manual. I'm interested
in reading more about the weighting system.

Thanks

Douglas Hardison
Bits, Bytes and Pieces Internet Service
3332A-3 Airport Boulevard
Wilson, NC 27896
Voice: 252-234-7040
Fax: 252-291-2119
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2002-04-01 Thread R. Scott Perry


Where might I find a copy of the JunkMail manual. I'm interested
in reading more about the weighting system.

You can find it at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm .  If you 
have any questions about it, please let me know.  Thanks.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2002-01-24 Thread David Stavert

Scott
Just noticed that the manual.htm for junkmail shows
simply rename the \IMail\Declude\junkmail.cfg file to junkmail.bak.  in
the Emergency Uninstall section.

David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2002-01-24 Thread R. Scott Perry


Just noticed that the manual.htm for junkmail shows
simply rename the \IMail\Declude\junkmail.cfg file to junkmail.bak.  in
the Emergency Uninstall section.

Thanks for pointing that out, it's been fixed.

[for those that didn't notice, it should be global.cfg and global.bak]
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .