As such, I am starting to see from addresses ending in
.rr.com coming from IPs that have Adelphia.net REVDNS records.
So
@rr.com .rr.
.rr.com .rr.
should become ?
Would it be an idea to ask for an enhanced spamdomains feature: Regex in the
second row?
Markus
---
This E-mail came
I just updated to Declude 3.0.5.5 and was wondering about a something's.
Decon will not work anymore. Is there a new version for the updated version
of Declude. I do have Hijack, AV and Junkmail and the consol is very useful.
Jeff Kratka
TymeWyse
19, 2005 4:06 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5
I just updated to Declude 3.0.5.5 and was wondering about a something's.
Decon will not work anymore. Is there a new version for the updated version
of Declude. I do have Hijack, AV and Junkmail
Webmaster
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5
Barry has reported that Deccon is being re-done and will be released
later.
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-346-5300 x112
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 5:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] update to Declude 3.0.5.5
Hijack is working fine, what is not in use is the Declude Console, which as
Randy posted
Incremental Release
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
. Bitmasked External Test Results - JunkMail enhancement
. Remove Process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Barry -
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
Excellent! Scott will be mad! He liked all those scanners running for
: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 05:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
Very kool.
Thanks Barry - for the enhancements, the beta program revived, and keeping
us informed.
Best,
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe
suggestions for bitmasking Invuribl
and Message Sniffer.
With Invuribl 2.0 bitmasking is built into the program.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
Exitscanonvirus: excellent enhancement.
I've cursed the Process Counter popup after every server restart
Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Update
Incremental Release
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers
with a
current service agreement
One of SpamCop's deputies replied to my message about them listing
several of AOL's mail servers for the better part of last week. The
gist of the reply was that there wasn't a bug, and these servers are
listed because they have been witnessed sending spam (though in very low
volumes as I had
Title: Update- Declude NOT being seen
Hi;
With Scott's help I finally think the reason Declude is not being seen in our case, in rare occasions, is understood.
It just happened that we found a trend that matched exactly our update cycle for the filters.
In our system we have an
the Imail SMTP
process. It is only on papaer at this time.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kami
RazvanSent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 4:50 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Update-
Declude
23, 2003 12:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update-
Declude NOT being seen
Or
just use automation that does not require the SMTP process to be
restarted.
We
have seen emails with no Declue headers but verry rarly. We never stop and
restart the SMTP unless
: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:59 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update-
Declude NOT being seen
Kevin:
If you update the Kill.lst (the SMTP kill list) you have to stop and
start SMTP before it is used.
At least that is why IPSwitch told me.
Kami
I have added the following to both GibberishSUB and AntiGibberishSUB files:
SUBJECT 0 CONTAINS asr#
This has shown up in a few messages going to a financial company.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Thanks John. I marked it up along with two other recently reported
catches, more importantly, the addition of VIN numbers to the
exclusions. I put a space after the vin and nwq entries. I'll
update the file on my site after a little more time passes.
- GIBBERISHSUB and
I have an updated, almost ready for beta, version up now. Please have a look
and let me know what you think.
My next update message should be to notify of a downloadable beta (full
source), then hopefully a workable freeware release.
Again, the info.
http://spamreview.argolink.net
user: [EMAIL
Ok, I just uploaded a new revision to my Spambox App.
The URL is http://spamreview.argolink.net
email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass is demo
Info at http://spamreview.argolink.net/doc
It now has full capability to manage settings per user. A few more issues to
resolve and I will look at packaging it
this work...?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Charles Frolick [mailto:cmfrolick;argolink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not
related to SpamReview hold manager)
I caught a little settings
... However, I wonder what the
effective load would be on an IMail/Declude JunkMail server with a large
customer base with all of the per-user files that would be required to make
this work...?
Actually, there would normally be very little (if any) extra overhead. The
only extra overhead I
So it wouldn't work for the 6085accounts on
my default host. :-)
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
R. Scott
Perry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:32
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of
SpamReview web app (not related
So it wouldn't work for the 6085 accounts on my default host. :-)
It would work, there would just be a performance penalty -- but it wouldn't
be any worse than the performance penalty of IMail having 6,085 user
subdirectories off of the same directory. :)
If it *was* a performance issue,
. :-)
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Update of SpamReview web app (not related to
SpamReview hold manager)
... However, I wonder what the
effective load would
Do we have to do anything if we use this update.
Update to 7.07 from IMail Server 7.0 or higher. This patch includes all
prior 7.0x updates. In addition it updates: LDAPer.exe to correctly add LDAP
attributes from the command line, SMTP32 to properly bind to IP and Web
Messaging to create
Update to 7.07 from IMail Server 7.0 or higher.
There are usually two possible problems with IMail upgrades interfering
with Declude. The first is that IMail may overwrite the registry entry
that Declude uses. To fix this, you can run the \IMail\Declude.exe file
once to fix the registry
27 matches
Mail list logo
