tion, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQue
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can say definitively that the hotfix
worked. My DNS process is averaging less than 1% of CPU now during full
traffic and 12 hours after the last restart with a very heavy config
y,
January 25, 2005 10:25
AM
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can say definitively
that the hotfix
worked. My DNS process is averaging less than 1% of CPU now during
full
traffic and 12 hours a
,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 1:24
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow
directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Well, I can
-Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Tuesday,
January 25, 2005
10:25
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
We
-
From:
Matt
To:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent:
Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:01 PM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003
DNS
Yeah, that's what I meant :)
I also screwed up the stat for what MS DNS 2003 can
Matt, on the Windows 2003 DNS: You are aware of the time out issues and such
aren't you?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, January 24,
I know I'm not aware, care to expand?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Could you please let me know what condition causes E-mail to be left in
the overflow directory, and exactly how Declude determines how/when to
process such messages.
The short version is that the situation is handled better than if the
overflow directory isn't used (many people don't get
My understanding is that this is an issue with just some firewalls and
not universal. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Matt, on the Windows 2003 DNS: You are aware of the time out issues and such
aren't you?
John Tolmachoff
.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:09
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow
directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
My understanding is that this is an issue with just some
firewalls
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreau-Cook
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Windows 2003
DNS
I know I'm not aware, care to expand
Scott,
Am I to assume a first in, first out type of scenario in the way that
it handles the overflow?
I have my server set to 60 delivery threads, up from the default 30.
Sandy I believe indicated that 64 was the limit due to the fact that
IMail is not multi-threaded or something to that
David,
We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I use a
batch file.
REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE
declude x:\imail\spool\Qa6da175e02447716.SMD
call x:\imail\cleandq.bat
The Q file I referenced does not exist and it does not matter that it does
not.
Scott, thanks for the explanations. I still have a few follow-ups
though if you don't mind.
First off, since DNS is acting like such a hog on Windows 2003, I'm
going to guess that this is what is slowing down the processing of
E-mail and why I am suddenly getting steady overflow. I can
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Moreau-Cook
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Windows 2003
DNS
I know I'm not aware, care to expand
You seemed to indicate that service launched processes count against the
threads...meaning that smtp32.exe launches declude.exe, which launches
F-Prot and McAfee. So would this count for 4 threads (not according to
Declude, but Windows/IMail)? What about Sniffer and each external test
that
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also looked at the issue with MS DNS 2003. After a restart of DNS,
utilization dropped from an average of about 25% to under 1% (I had it
in performance monitor)...but then over the next
]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also looked at the issue with MS DNS 2003. After
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows
2003 DNS
I found MaxQueProc in the registry and changed that to 60. There is no
GUI config for this option.
I also
24, 2005 10:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS
Thanks Darrell, that definitely sounds like it's the
culprit:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=830381
This didn't come up in my searches because
21 matches
Mail list logo
