Monday, November 14, 2005, 9:01:38 PM, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
No, it is the version of Subversion of the user running the buildjars
target from the source distribution that matters, not the person
packaging the release. The manifest is generated by Ant at the time
that the buildjars
Hi all,
has anyone tried to build the Derby jars based on the 10.1.2.1 (10.1.2
Release Candidate #2) source code archive? (We are supposed to be able
to do this, right?)
I downloaded db-derby-10.1.2.1-src.tar.gz from
http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/derby10.1.2.1.330608/ and extracted
the
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:00 AM, John Embretsen wrote:
has anyone tried to build the Derby jars based on the 10.1.2.1 (10.1.2
Release Candidate #2) source code archive? (We are supposed to be able
to do this, right?)
A google search led me to a thread in the mailing list archive of
Apache
Monday, November 14, 2005, 7:33:51 PM CET, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:00 AM, John Embretsen wrote:
has anyone tried to build the Derby jars based on the 10.1.2.1 (10.1.2
Release Candidate #2) source code archive? (We are supposed to be able
to do this, right?)
A google
On Nov 14, 2005, at 11:52 AM, John Embretsen wrote:
I am using Subversion 1.1.4, but this should not matter in this
case, should it?
I mean, I guess it is the subversion version of the person doing
the release
packaging (in this case Kathey, right?) that matters, or am I
misunderstanding
