This is terrible news. I remember fondly working with him on Epiphany many
years ago. His patience and good character were instrumental in getting me
started on this whole crazy business, as I'm sure it was the case for many
others.
He will be missed, and I'd humbly suggest the Foundation to
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
* Do we have something like HTTPS everywhere?
This is also known as HSTS[1] (HTTP Strict Transport Security), and
I would indeed love to have some time to implement it in Web.
Some other things that would be nice
Hi,
just a few comments about recent API breaks that have bothered some people.
- WebKitGTK+ (in its original form, *not* the WebKit2 stuff) is API
stable. This means we won't willingly break its API. This means if the
API breaks in a release it's not intentional, so asking us to notify
in
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
2. While I understand that mobile is new 'shiny' so far I am sceptical
of unified interfaces (and several other things from presentation like
pre-installed GNOME on tablet). I will stop here as it would be
pointless
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
Is there a reference application doing this right?
I ask this because Epiphany¹ has no menu, but does and a funky button
over on the right that, upon investigation, turns out to be a menu has
useful things like
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the part of the user base that answers to polls in Google+.
Right. That is why noone says use those answers from Google+
literally. It would be nice to find the way that would protect the
results from the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
The design team IS NOT welcome to:
* Second-guess maintainers or well-intentioned contributors.
Surely the Design Team is also composed of well intentioned
contributors that only want the best for Gnome and do
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Patryk Zawadzki pat...@pld-linux.org wrote:
W dniu 24 kwietnia 2012 02:32 użytkownik Danielle Madeley
danielle.made...@collabora.co.uk napisał:
I sort of like the idea of a totally fresh GNOME session starting up
with a Web and www.gnome.org/welcome/ in the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Flash might still be needed for some things, but youtube is not one of
them. Its HTML5 version works just fine, so I see no reason to design
that page with that option as default.
Can't we self-host the videos? I'm not
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
===
EPIPHANY
===
There are still references to the GNOME web browser on translations
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671424
Would require string freeze breaks.
After grepping this
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Claudio Saavedra csaave...@gnome.org wrote:
Actually the dependence on NM is quite soft. We could just depend on
the NM service being there and if it's not just not use it. For a
bunch of macros that we use and theoretically shouldn't change often
we don't need
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
To sum it all up, I believe the current dynamic of the design team is doing
damage to GNOME
as a community.
I think what is really doing damage to the community is this kind of
hyperbolic accusation around the design team
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Xavier Claessens xclae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello ddl,
Looks like it is time to start flames on ddl, so let's start a new one:
No, it's not. Please do not spam the list with your pet peeve bugs.
Especially when there's already a bug filed in bugzilla, which is
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
There's no particular reason for this, we just never got around to
untangle them. If there's increased interest in having them as
separate libraries
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
There are, however, nontrivial issues. First is that actually in good
news on the gjs front, a standalone Spidermonkey release was just made
recently, and I have a patch ready to use it in gjs:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc
(elle.uca) or reply here.
Looks good for epiphany too, thank you!
Xan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
- There was a proposal by the epiphany team to look at epiphany /
shell integration.
We are working on defining a roadmap for 3.2 and beyond these days,
but it seems clear to me that for 3.2 we'll at least try to
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
epiphany: Port Epiphany to GtkApplication
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637334
Hmm, how is this a blocker?
epiphany: Port EphyNetMonitor to GDBus
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624421
Or this one?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
I haven't tested anything at runtime, though, so maybe it's a
complete disaster ;-) We'll see tomorrow.
Issues I have noticed so far:
-
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
Sergey, who sometimes prefers to look backwards rather than forward
no problem with that. you can maintain the old user experience for
yourself and never upgrade.
and snarkyness is never going to get you anything,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to build GNMOE 2.91.4 from tarballs, and it's not
looking good at all :-)
Matthias already mentioned some breakages caused by GTK+ 2.91.7, but
it's not just that.
Here are the tarballs that I have
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
So, do we really want to promote this as the way we do plugins in GNOME?
Language neutrality for plugins seems nice, but is a bit of a trap.
This is precisely the reason why we removed Python support when we
added the
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
We talked about it today on #debian-devel, and it turns out there is a
very serious problem that is fixed by symbol versioning in GTK+.
$ objdump -p /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
[snip]
NEEDED
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
Hi!
(...)
Hey,
before addressing any specific point I just want to say that I pretty
much agree with the spirit of the Release Team's proposal, if not with
all its details, and that I'd rather see us engage in a bit of
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 10 février 2010, à 11:56 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
I've just updated WebKitGtk required version here [1] and in jhbuild
moduleset for 2.30.
Version 1.1.21 is required by Epiphany.
Thanks. Btw, I guess it's
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 09:25 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
Hi All:
There is a convention of having the user press F7 to enable caret
browsing. For example, when running Firefox, one can press F7 to
enable the caret in the
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Well, right. That's why I mentioned XSettings, which can
then be accessed with the GtkSettings API. In fact, even
after GSettings/dconf, I think it would make sense to have
an XSetting, since it can be picked up by other
2009/9/26 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le samedi 26 septembre 2009 à 12:27 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
on the serious side: auto-generation of ChangeLogs is all fine and
dandy, but distribution packagers should care about the NEWS files being
correct[0]; a NEWS file is usually much
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
po...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Xan Lopez wrote:
2009/9/26 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
Le samedi 26 septembre 2009 à 12:27 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
on the serious side: auto-generation of ChangeLogs is all fine and
dandy
Epiphany is branched for 2.28, the branch name is gnome-2-28.
Cheers,
Xan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 11:18, Jamie McCracken (jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com) wrote:
The indexer part is optional
The main part tracker-store is just a database with querying and is to
be used by zeitgeist
If the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Maciej Piechotkauzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
It can be used directly by applications that feed it data through an
API. Zeitgeist is an example, another could be bookmarks/history
storage in Epiphany.
Xan
Hmm. Is it one-in-all database? Then:
- How you keep
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Lennart Poetteringmzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 18.08.09 18:55, Xan Lopez (x...@gnome.org) wrote:
If tracker-store is not useful on its own and currently not used by
anything else in GNOME, does it really make sense to push it into
GNOME?
Also
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Maciej Piechotkauzytkown...@gmail.com wrote:
Epiphany does not share its metadata with anyone else nor can you cross
query it
I believe that gnome do and/or deskbar do it quite well w/out tracker.
No, they have to go and manually parse the private file
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Joanmarie
Diggsjoanmarie.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Will.
In my opinion, having more people from the WebKit internals side
certainly couldn't hurt. :-) But I'll leave your question to Xan.
First of all, sorry for the late reply, I was away on Paris
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Spidermonkey: Mature, good API for extensibility. Nice language
extensions. (JS 1.7.) Mostly packaged as part of xulrunner, which is
a problem. Maintained by an organization that has a thorough
commitment to open
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Havoc Pennington
havoc.penning...@gmail.com wrote:
So perhaps it would be a good idea to just stick to a JS defined in
some standard widely used for all GNOME code, in order to avoid future
headaches, and consider other languages with real self-extension
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
If we say we have to not only support spidermonkey and JSC, but any
future hypothetical JS implementation, then we're really committing to
not only not using language extensions, but _never_ using or creating
extensions.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Robert Carr ca...@rpi.edu wrote:
Can you commit to put in the few days work to make a patch for
gnome-shell to use libseed? I think that makes it easy for the
gnome-shell developers to go to libseed
Yes I can do this (and have been planning to) and put it in
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Jason D. Clinton m...@jasonclinton.com wrote:
+1 from me. Robert has been very responsive and his team of minions
have made changes whenever I've asked.
I think we must have both engines. The JS optimization battle between
Mozilla and Apple is just now heating
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote:
Quite apart from choosing which 1 of 2 candidate engines we should
choose, something seems very wrong if we have to maintain a runtime
engine for a programming language that we want to use. It's not
something we do for
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Joanmarie Diggs
joanmarie.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, my answer is gosh, I sure hope so. :-) Admittedly, not as
good as a heck yes!, but better than no.
Where things stand as of today is that WebKit needs quite a bit of work
to ready as far as a11y is
Hello,
the aim of the Epiphany team is to make 2.28 our first WebKit release.
For this to happen we need to replace our external dependency on Gecko
with WebKitGTK+, so consider this a request to do so.
In the post 2.26 module decision discussion (see
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Alp Toker a...@nuanti.com wrote:
I'd like to end the email by requesting feedback from all the module
maintainers that are considering a switch to WebKitGTK+, in light of
the idea proposed by the Release Team of making a general switch from
gecko to webkit in
44 matches
Mail list logo
