You are right, that indeed was the issue (for one of that failing test).
I have pushed a commit with this change to fix that one.
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 3:13 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-12-10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
testCreateDoubleHanging is related to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla
I'll investigate why this is failing (local tests pass for me) and fix it.
-Jaikiran
On 10/12/17 2:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See
<https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Linux/jdk=JDK%201.8%20(latest)/977/display/redirect?page=chan
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49
Committed to master branch
https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/cefdbd398d8e310b218f9e2ca6f0b7fb13eddbb9
---
-
To unsubscribe, e
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49
>> Overall I'm in favor of this change and if you want to spend the time on
fixing the bugzilla issue in a Java5 friendly way for 1.9.x that would
certainly be good - bit not something I
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49#discussion_r155941213
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/SymbolicLinkUtils.java ---
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
* a symbolic link based on the absent support for them in Java
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49#discussion_r155941155
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/unix/Symlink.java
---
@@ -500,18 +502,12 @@ private void doLink(String res, String lnk) throws
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49#discussion_r155941101
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/unix/Symlink.java
---
@@ -448,49 +432,67 @@ private void handleError(String msg
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49#discussion_r155941095
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/unix/Symlink.java
---
@@ -207,26 +198,30 @@ public void recreate() throws BuildException
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49#discussion_r155941080
--- Diff: manual/Tasks/symlink.html ---
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Symlink
Description
- Manages symbolic links on Unix based platforms. Can be used
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/49
[master branch] - Fix BZ-58683
The commit here fixes the issue reported at
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683.
This commit along with fixing the issue reported in that bug
inconsistent when someone adding new code using a different construct
(like not using explicit brackets), but it's not that big a deal, IMO.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For a
[1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223
[2]
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/Runtime.html#version--
-Jaikiran
On 28/11/17 10:10 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-11-28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Maybe we really need to start parsing the java.version syste
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/48
BZ-61718 Upgrade to 0.1.54 of Jsch library
The commit here upgrades Jsch library dependency to `0.1.54` (which is the
latest released version) as requested in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla
removed, it no longer guarantees the entire block to
be done serially by a single thread anymore.
-Jaikiran
On 02/11/17 2:50 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
No need to synchronise a concurrent map
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org
Let's not force update the upstream repo please, especially the real
branches like the master branch.
-Jaikiran
On 21/10/17 10:22 PM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant-ivy
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 744c31824 -> 2074889ec (forced update)
IVY-1420 document curr
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/37
Tests against various JDK versions against Windows and Linux went fine
without any regressions. Will go ahead and merge this now
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/37#discussion_r141594830
--- Diff: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/ResourceUtils.java ---
@@ -666,6 +666,14 @@ private static void copyWithFilterSets(final Resource
source, final
Is there a source repo and steps that I can follow to build and
reproduce this issue? My attempts so far haven't been able to reproduce
this.
-Jaikiran
On 14/09/17 1:57 PM, Aurélien Pupier wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1568 using
latest 2.5.0
Since the latest released version of that library is 1.58, I think we
should use that version, unless there's a specific reason to not use it.
A quick compilation of Ivy with this library and checking their docs for
JDK compatibility suggested no issues with 1.58.
-Jaikiran
On 19/09/17 10
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/39
Merged to both 1.9.x and master branches.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/39
Ignore the Jenkins job message please - I haven't yet got it configured
correctly.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/39
[1.9.x branch] BZ-58589 Preserve last modified time (if asked for) for
files uploaded by SFTP
The commit here adds support for preserving the last modified time on files
when uploaded via SFTP
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
GitHub user jaikiran reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
Do not merge
Testing Jenkins integration. Do not merge this PR
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaikiran/ant dummy
Alternatively
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/38
Do not merge
Testing Jenkins integration. Do not merge this PR
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaikiran/ant dummy
Alternatively
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/37
[1.9.x branch] BZ-60644 Fix file corruption during copy task
The commit here includes a fix for the issue reported in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644. As described in that
issue
er instead of the BasicURLHandler.
That seems to be one part of the problem. I'll take a more detailed look after checking
out the code which invokes Ivy.
-Jaikiran
On 14/09/17 1:57 PM, Aurélien Pupier wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1568 using
la
merge conflicts, if any) against the relevant branch of the
latest upstream.
-Jaikiran
On 06/09/17 8:46 AM, gin...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: ant-ivy
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 614bf1ad5 -> b693aa0a2 (forced update)
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy/blob/b693a
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/60#discussion_r136327295
--- Diff: build-release.xml ---
@@ -179,11 +180,11 @@
-
+
--- End diff
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53
Thanks! This is now merged to upstream.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
On 29/08/17 12:35 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I noticed another problem with asciidoc: 1.5.4 fails on my box with the
latest Java 8u144, I had to downgrade it to 1.5.3 -- did anyone else see
that?
1.5.4 works fine for me with Java 8.
-Jaikiran
version) are:
org.apache.ivy
ivy
2.5.0-SNAPSHOT
and can be found here
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-Snapshot-Deploy/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
-Jaikiran
effort algorithm during install, so that
everything gets installed except the missing artifacts. (Note: these
missing artifacts are not in the public maven repository due to
licensing issues)
...
[1]
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/master/tutorial/build-repository/basic.html
-Jaikiran
As far as I know, the publish task itself doesn't fetch any
dependencies. The dependencies itself are downloaded by a (previous)
resolve task that is invoked separately and explicitly.
-Jaikiran
On 31/07/17 11:32 PM, maikel van den Hurk wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering if there is already
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/59
>> thanks @jaikiran do you have an Estimated Time for next release
containing this bugfix?
@apupier - the plan is to have it soon (no specific date yet). We are
almost at the la
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/59
Thank you for the PR and sorry it took a while to merge this. I have
included the change you suggested in this PR with a minor change and merged it
upstream.
---
If your project is set up
.
-Jaikiran
On 23/08/17 12:12 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
Earlier, I wrote about the amount of documentation-related issues in Jira.
There are 27 of them still open [1], and some of them could be closed right
away.
I would be glad to help, but I have no privileges. Is there somebody who
could
I'm looking into that JIRA. I'll assigned it to my name now.
-Jaikiran
On 06/08/17 12:52 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I went through JIRA issues and noticed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1485 was discussed relatively
recently ;-) Anybody looking into it?
Gintas
P.S. JIRA
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57
Hi Gintas,
To be clear - what I meant/proposed in the dev list was:
- It's fine to have all the changes related to introducing that new method
with Java generics
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57
Overall, this looks fine to me. I just need some inputs from the rest of
the team on one specific change, for which I have raised a dev list thread
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org
that new
method, but I think that should be fine for now.
I would like some inputs on how we should go about this.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57/files#diff-8078d19e36e6c0b7abb0690fca45db0fR191
-Jaikiran
that new
method, but I think that should be fine for now.
I would like some inputs on how we should go about this.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/57/files#diff-8078d19e36e6c0b7abb0690fca45db0fR191
-Jaikiran
On 27/07/17 9:34 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
There's a JIRA[2] asking for the docs to be updated to explain this
resolver.
...
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-804
I meant this JIRA which asks for it to be documented
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-612
-Jaikiran
ave to do.
On the other hand, if we don't have to support this, then I can just
remove it from that typedef.properties file.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/blob/master/src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/resolver/CacheResolver.java
[2] https://issues.apache.org/
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53
Commit
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53/commits/414651c8841a09a9d9d4b0365ee8e7227fba8429
in this PR has now been merged to upstream
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit
Github user jaikiran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit/366fb741f0772c8309f9dfe963f6032b091d7b89#commitcomment-23334838
Do you mean for the `symlinkmass` deprecation? In this release, I just
wanted it to be deprecated with a log message showing up
.
-Jaikiran
On 27/07/17 5:07 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
I did a few simple tests on Windows 7 + Cygwin and NIO.2 seems to work just
fine (if privilege to create symlinks is granted).
+1
Gintas
2017-07-27 11:40 GMT+02:00 Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com>:
There
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53#discussion_r129757849
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/conflict/LatestCompatibleConflictManager.java
---
@@ -85,14 +85,12 @@ public LatestCompatibleConflictManager
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14712
-Jaikiran
On 26/07/17 6:36 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
More of a FYI than anything else - the past couple of days or so, we
haven't had regular successful runs of our various Ivy Jenkins jobs.
Each run failing with different errors, all pointing
To avoid more such mails, I'm going to disable this job for a few hours
till we get the infra issues sorted out.
-Jaikiran
On 26/07/17 10:44 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/627/display/redirect>
--
S
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53#discussion_r129587968
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/conflict/LatestCompatibleConflictManager.java
---
@@ -85,14 +85,12 @@ public LatestCompatibleConflictManager
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53#discussion_r129593699
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/report/XmlReportParser.java ---
@@ -71,132 +71,139 @@
--- End diff --
This file has a large
ymbolicLink(java.nio.file.Path,%20java.nio.file.Path,%20java.nio.file.attribute.FileAttribute...)
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
the Infra team mailing list
or their JIRA to see if this is already reported by other projects. I
will see if I can find some time tonight to check that and report it, if
it hasn't yet been.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user jaikiran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit/87c4e0656a10f7d9c18a203cf80c01406aeb6820#commitcomment-23286798
Sure, I'll do a find/replace in one of my upcoming doc fixes commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
the latest snapshot a try to see if there
are any unforeseen regressions.
-Jaikiran
On 25/07/17 12:37 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Le 24 juil. 2017 à 08:19, Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> a écrit :
That's a a big enough reason to move to HttpComponents Client 4.x version! I'll
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/53
Hi Gintas,
Given the amount of commits and the changes involved in this PR, it's a bit
difficult to review it. I think this PR even includes some of the changes that
have already been
That's a a big enough reason to move to HttpComponents Client 4.x
version! I'll have that done in this release of Ivy then.
-Jaikiran
On 24/07/17 11:43 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2017-07-24, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Ivy currently uses commons-httpclient for dealing with HTTP
repositories
and moving to the more latest
HttpComponents Client sounds fine to me.
-Jaikiran
So I'm +1 in dropping commons-http-2 support.
What about dropping commons-http-3 too? Here I can't see the requirement for
having this
dynamic loading (but maybe someone else).
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachrich
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
>> So it's not going to work out supporting 2.x version since we will end
up using 3.x APIs at compile time. But that's a different topic altogether and
something that I will raise a de
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
>> VsftpRepository has DEFAULT_READ_TIMEOUT and DISCONNECT_COMMAND_TIMEOUT;
would that require an additional timeout attribute?
I had a look at this. Given that there's currently
/ivy.xml#L47
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
It looks like the domain got repurposed sometime in 2012.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
Gintas, thanks for pointing me to that code. I now understand what you
meant.
So essentially, Ivy internally tries to support both 2.x and 3.x version of
HTTP client library at runtime
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/35
All done - applied this commit to 1.9.x branch and then merged to master
branch. The pushed commit also includes updates to the WHATSNEW and contributor
files.
---
If your project is set up
Github user jaikiran closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/35
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
In short, yes - there's a plan to have a Ivy release soon. A more
detailed explanation is available in this recent Ivy users mailing list
thread https://www.mail-archive.com/ivy-user@ant.apache.org/msg06244.html
-Jaikiran
On 22/07/17 8:12 AM, Nick C. wrote:
Will there be a new Ivy release
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/35
[1.9.x branch] Fix for BZ-43271 BZ-59648
The commit here fixes the issue reported in:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43271#c6
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
>> The PR contains additional changes to HttpClientHandler, introducing
HttpConnectionManagerParams, which is not available in Commons HTTP Client
version 2 (over 10 years old and virtuall
ctually write a test to verify this behaivour, I may have missed or
misunderstood the parsing code so if anyone thinks what I state isn't
accurate, feel free to correct me.
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
[2]
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/settings/resolvers.html#comm
GitHub user jaikiran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/54
IVY-735 Support timeouts on resolvers
The commit in this PR adds support for specifying connection and read
timeouts for resolvers, so that users have control over how the resolvers
behave when
of it to use instead of trying to make it consistent via checkstyle
or refactoring.
-Jaikiran
On 18/07/17 5:09 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
In my last PR I tried to address inconsistencies with import of nested
classes, such as Map.Entry; some classes, e.g. IvySettings ended up with
foreach loops
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52
It looks like this PR has been updated with additional unrelated changes.
Except for these 2 commits in this PR:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52/commits
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127475255
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/sftp/SFTPRepository.java ---
@@ -148,7 +142,7 @@ public void put(File source, String destination
but if this whole approach looks
fine, I will take this further and make sure things work as expected.
[1]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8
[2]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8#diff-cd8ed454a52f
s fine, I will
take this further and make sure things work as expected.
[1]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8
[2]
https://github.com/jaikiran/ant-ivy/commit/e501d9deca78db8b934f8a2710ebcfeaeb1456c8#diff-cd8ed454a52f4afa779574f560
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52
I've reviewed this PR and apart from the review comments noted, the rest of
the changes look fine. Please only include any review comments related changes
to this PR, from now on. Else it's going
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127398802
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/util/url/HttpClientHandler.java ---
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ public URLInfo getURLInfo(URL url, int timeout
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127398451
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/tools/analyser/JarJarDependencyAnalyser.java ---
@@ -39,21 +39,22 @@ public JarJarDependencyAnalyser(File
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127397658
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/ssh/SshCache.java ---
@@ -263,9 +263,8 @@ public void clearSession(Session session
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127397389
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/sftp/SFTPRepository.java ---
@@ -148,7 +142,7 @@ public void put(File source, String destination
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127396424
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/util/VersionRange.java ---
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ public boolean isClosedRange() {
return
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127396341
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/repo/RepositoryManifestIterable.java
---
@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ protected InputStream getInputStream(String f) throws
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127396320
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/repo/RepositoryManifestIterable.java
---
@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ protected InputStream getInputStream(String f) throws
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127395825
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/repo/AbstractFSManifestIterable.java
---
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ public AbstractFSManifestIterable(T root
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127395788
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/repo/AbstractFSManifestIterable.java
---
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ public AbstractFSManifestIterable(T root
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/52#discussion_r127395633
--- Diff: src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/p2/XMLInputParser.java ---
@@ -19,12 +19,11 @@
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream
s. In this
specific case this merge commit just points to the previous commit that
was already in the upstream repo. We won't have to revert anything.
-Jaikiran
On 13/07/17 5:47 AM, Maarten Coene wrote:
I remember IntelliJ was saying something about a failed commit asking me to
merge to the la
I'm guessing that while committing the fix for IVY-1404 you probably did
a "git merge" against latest master of upstream, which created this
merge commit.
-Jaikiran
On 12/07/17 1:45 PM, Maarten Coene wrote:
Any idea where this commit comes from?I didn't touch any of these fi
.eclipse.org which just presents a
generic 404 page.
I think for us, at this point, it's a matter of changing our build file
to just point directly to the relevant specific links listed on
archive.eclipse.org here
http://archive.eclipse.org/tools/gef/downloads/drops/3.9.100/R201405261516/
-Jaikiran
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/51
Thanks for the PR. This has now been merged. I had to fix the
`ModuleDescriptorMemoryCacheTest` which got exposed by (valid) changes in this
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user jaikiran commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/48
>>
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30454635/when-using-for-a-primitive-and-a-boxed-value-is-autoboxing-done-or-is-unbox
Thanks - the JLS sections[1][2] mentioned in there answ
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/48#discussion_r125161935
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/signer/bouncycastle/OpenPGPSignatureGenerator.java
---
@@ -161,7 +159,7 @@ private PGPSecretKey readSecretKey
Github user jaikiran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/48#discussion_r125162592
--- Diff:
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/signer/bouncycastle/OpenPGPSignatureGenerator.java
---
@@ -161,7 +159,7 @@ private PGPSecretKey readSecretKey
On 29-Jun-2017, at 11:29 AM, Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m picking up “OSGi” section next.
I have completed and pushed the migration of “OSGi” and “Using standalone”
sections to upstream (it’s actually live on site since yesterday). For the OSGi
pages, I had
the “experimental”
note/section that we repeat (copy/paste really) on our OSGi pages.
-Jaikiran
> Le 29 juin 2017 à 15:16, Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> On 29-Jun-2017, at 3:58 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org>
> wrote:
>
&g
for
it) https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/48#discussion-diff-125161935R162.
Other than that, the PR looks fine to me.
-Jaikiran
On 01-Jul-2017, at 5:37 PM, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> wrote:
Thank you very much Gintas.
These PRs are huge, so they will take a litt
I have now disabled the nightly job[1] and added a note to the job's
description stating that the latest binaries can be obtained from the other Ivy
job[2].
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy-NightlyDistribution/
[2] https://builds.apache.org/job/Ivy/lastSuccessfulBuild/
-Jaikiran
On 29
501 - 600 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
