.
[1]
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/75/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/javadoc-test_xml/testFailOnWarning/
[2]
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2021-June/003075.html
-Jaikiran
On 25/06/21
Hello Rory,
On 14/06/21 11:42 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Many thanks Jaikiran for the analysis and the feedback to the
security-dev mailing list !
Do let us know about the final test failure ?
I had a look at this one in more detail. The failure is in one of our
javadoc related tests[1
Additionally, more as a FYI - we have started to receive user reports
that the new security manager deprecation WARNING messages on System.err
are impacting some of their existing build scripts
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65381
-Jaikiran
On 15/06/21 9:51 pm, Jaikiran Pai
the upcoming JDK 17
release.
[1]
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/javadoc-dev/2021-June/003075.html
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/72/
-Jaikiran
On 10/05/21 1:51 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, **
*OpenJDK 17 Early Access build 21 is now available at
**https://jdk.java.net/17* <https://jdk.java.net/17>
* These early-
Hello Rory,
I ran this against our Ant project on a Linux system. No issues observed
in this run with JDK 17 build 17-ea+23-2064.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/73/
-Jaikiran
On 21/05/21 12:28 pm, Rory O'Donnell
Hello Stefan,
Releasing a new version sounds good. As for the version number, I'll let
you decide since I don't have prior background with AntUnit releases :)
-Jaikiran
On 23/05/21 2:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
it looks as if we didn't do what we preach, see
https://bz.apache.org
in security-dev mailing list of OpenJDK, explaining how this
is currently impacting Ant project and some potential ways to reduce
this impact. The discussion thread is here
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2021-June/026660.html
-Jaikiran
On 28/06/21 8:22 pm, Rick Hillegas
+1.
Downloaded .tar.gz binary. Checked some manuals and the NOTICE file.
Used this version to build some of our internal projects. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 10/07/21 11:43 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
+1.
Downloaded the .tar.gz binary, checked the NOTICE file, some manuals and
built our internal projects using this new version. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 11/07/21 12:21 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
[3] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17/pull/13
-Jaikiran
On 27/06/21 11:22 pm, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Open JDK 17 build 17-ea+28-2534 causes the ant 1.10.6 task to
produce the following warnings when you DON'T fork the JVM:
WARNING: A terminally deprecated method in java.lang.System has been
called
WARNI
-1.4.1.jar is present
- Verified the ant-antunit-1.4.1.jar.sha512 checksum is correct.
No issues found.
-Jaikiran
On 03/07/21 6:11 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for AntUnit 1.4.1:
git tag: 1_4_1_RC1
on commit: e436acf
tarballs: https
Hello Aleksei,
That looks fine to me. I've merged it to our master branch. I've added
your github profile name (Alex) to our contributors list. If you want to
use a different name to be added, please let us know, I'll update
accordingly.
-Jaikiran
On 30/04/21 2:06 pm, Aleksei Zotov wrote
Hello Rory,
I just ran the JDK 16 build 16+35-2229 against our Ant testsuite on a
Linux setup[1]. All went fine and no issues observed.
[1]
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/jdk_axis=jdk16_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/65/
-Jaikiran
On 05/02/21 4:01 pm
An update:
On 27/02/21 3:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-02-25, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Is there anything anyone else is working on, that needs to be part of
the release?
I'd like to look into solving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
And https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla
Hello Rory,
I ran this against our Ant project tests on a Linux setup[1] and no
issues found in this run against build 17-ea+16-1315.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/70/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 02/04/21 12:52 pm, Rory
Hello Stefan,
Yes that sounds reasonable to me and even the set of tasks that you
noted to have these properties.
-Jaikiran
On 14/03/21 4:55 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62330 reminded me of
something I wanted to discuss.
Sometimes people
/jdk_axis=jdk16_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/68/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 16/03/21 8:16 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 16 / JDK 16
NullOutputStream();
+
+
Should we consider adding a private constructor to prevent anyone from
directly instantiating this class? It won't make that major a
difference, but since we already expose this INSTANCE, it probably is a
good idea to prevent direct instantiation?
-Jaikiran
Hello Stefan,
On 27/02/21 3:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-02-25, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Is there anything anyone else is working on, that needs to be part of
the release?
I'd like to look into solving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105
And https://bz.apache.org
is working on, that needs to be part of the release?
[1] https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WHATSNEW
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
With +1s from Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this vote has
passed.
I'll start the rest of the release activities shortly.
Thank you everyone.
-Jaikiran
On 12/04/21 10:01 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10:
git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1
Thank you Paul for testing this against the Groovy test suite.
-Jaikiran
On 14/04/21 1:14 pm, Paul King wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
* Checked signatures and hashes for zip and tar.gz src distributions.
* I also ran the Apache Groovy build against the new artifacts. The Groovy
test suite has >
-1047/org/apache/ant/
Snapcraft Build
Revision 18 in latest/candidate
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
15th April 2021 04:30 AM UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Changes that will be part of this release are noted here
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.10.html
-Jaikiran
On 12/04/21 10:01 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10:
git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1
on commit
This is a platform independent
alternative to directiong output to any kind of null device.
* junitlauncher now prints a more useful and instantaneous summary
of
tests being run, closely matching the junit task's summary.
Bu
junitlauncher is more useful in
this release, against an existing project.
-Jaikiran
On 13/04/21 1:31 pm, Maarten Coene wrote:
+1
Maarten
Op maandag 12 april 2021 06:31:29 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.10:
git tag: ANT_1.10.10_RC1
I just completed the release formalities for Ant 1.10.10. I will send
out the official announcement mail on Monday. In the meantime, could
someone which access permissions on Bugzilla please close the 1.10.10
version and create a new 1.10.11 version there?
-Jaikiran
Thank you Stefan.
-Jaikiran
On 18/04/21 1:36 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-04-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I just completed the release formalities for Ant 1.10.10. I will send
out the official announcement mail on Monday. In the meantime, could
someone which access permissions on Bugzilla
Hello Rory,
No issues were observed against our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup with
JDK 17 build 17-ea+18-1490.
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/71/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 20/04/21 3:21 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
*Hi
On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the
SecurityManager if permissions have been defined. Where else do we use
one?
From
On 23/08/21 9:17 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-23, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal
Hello Stefan,
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions"
type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager
to allow users to configure the necessary security p
On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions"
type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager
to allow users to configure the necessary security p
- I
haven't done any real work on that one yet. Are there any other issues
that others are working on and want to be part of this release?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional
,label_exp=ubuntu/
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/80/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 14/09/21 8:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17 *
**
* JDK 17
Hello Stefan,
On 27/06/21 4:10 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-06-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So right now I don't have specific proposals for fixing this but just
a note that we will have to look into this one for the upcoming JDK 17
release.
I guess we can simply concatenate stderr
changes). Given this, I would like to have some
discussion on how we should proceed with this.
[1] https://ant.apache.org/manual/Types/permissions.html
[2]
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2021-June/026660.html
-Jaikiran
Hello Rory,
I ran our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup against both Java 17 and Java
18 EA releases. No new issues noticed and things look fine.
-Jaikiran
On 07/08/21 8:23 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are now in the Release Candidate Phase
[1
/orgapacheant-1052
Snapcraft Build
Revision 22 in latest/candidate
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
16th October 2021 05:30 AM UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
On 19/10/21 9:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-10-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12
product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant?
Done.
Thank you Stefan.
I don't think anybody else of the project team has enough
onwarning" is set to true to account for changes in JDK 17+
* The tar task now preserves symlinks of nested tarfilesets.
Github Pull Request #142
-Jaikiran (on behalf of Apache Ant team)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product
version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? I'm almost done
with the rest of the release formalities and will send the release
annonucement later today.
-Jaikiran
files.
As a result, I will cancel this vote and will initiate a new vote which
should include these fixes, shortly.
Thank you all for voting and testing the release artifacts. Sorry about
the delay in my responses this week - it has been a busy week at work.
-Jaikiran
On 07/10/21 7:51 pm
+1.
- Used this version to build some of our internal projects.
- Checked some random manuals.
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12:
git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2
on commit
With +1s from:
- Stefan
- Maarten
- Jaikiran
and no other votes, this release vote has now *passed*.
Thank you all for voting, both on this one and the previous RC1. I'll
move forward with the rest of the process shortly.
-Jaikiran
On 18/10/21 2:52 pm, Maarten Coene wrote:
+1
Maarten
On 28/09/21 12:55 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-26, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I was planning to initiate a release tonight, but trying to upgrade
one of the optional dependencies has shown up some interesting issue
in the maven ant task (which apparently has been EOLed[1]) that we use
is necessary for it to work properly in the recently released
Java 17 version.
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
4th October 2021 03:00 AM UTC (given that it's a weekend in the next
couple of days, I decided to extend the voting period till Monday)
-Jaikiran
archives. Thank you very much for bringing it to attention.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
ate thread to discuss that.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
- Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
- Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals
- Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant
- Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant
All looks fine.
-Jaikiran
On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I've
I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward.
Anyone have some time this week to test this?
-Jaikiran
On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
noted in
https
On 19/09/21 3:30 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I wanted to look into and sort out
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424 in this release
too, but it looks like I may not be able to do that and I'm not sure
how
he PR (please, chime in):
https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/171
I'll take a look at this one.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
this
version. We (Ant project) will be working on this to get it in working
shape, in the coming weeks.
-Jaikiran
On 16/11/21 4:22 pm, david.delabas...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Jaikiran/Stefan,
I’m happy to announce that moving forward Oracle’s Java DevRel Team
will manage the Quality Outreach
Hello Rory,
I ran the JDK 18 EA (build 18-ea+20-1248) against our Ant testsuite on
Linux and no issues were encountered:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/82/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/
-Jaikiran
On 26/10/21 5:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote
Hello Rory,
We ran this against our Ant project and no new issues have been observed
with both these JDK 17 and 18 EA builds.
-Jaikiran
On 16/07/21 12:51 am, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
Hi Stefan/Jaikiran,
*Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase Two [1].*
*Please advise if you find
ing the JVM. There's no other way past
this if you want to use it against Java 18 or 19.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Java 7 at this point isn't worth it. I think as long as we do
the changes/modernizations in controlled manner it's a good idea and I'm
in favour of.
-Jaikiran
On 08/02/22 11:18 pm, Matt Benson wrote:
Java 7 public updates have ended nearly 7 years ago. Looking over the Ivy
codebase
Hello Stefan,
On 08/02/22 1:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2022-02-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
So the launch scripts (the Linux one and the .bat for Windows one)
have both been updated to set this system property only for Java 18
and 19. I expect this to be a temporary thing till the new API
Hello Jan,
On 08/02/22 12:04 pm, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello Earl,
On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote:
How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to
test
their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security
results are available at:
Java 18 -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/16/
Java 19 -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/17/
-Jaikiran
On 31/01/22 2:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
First
ine. However, like I said my
scripting skills are minimal, so if any of these changes in these
scripts can be done in a better way, please feel free to do so. I would
do it myself, but it's going to take me trial and error methods to get
it right :)
-Jaikiran
On 07/02/22 12:26 pm, Stefan Bodewi
commits is in a
different job (on Windows) -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Windows/OS=Windows,jdk=jdk_1.8_latest/120/testReport/src.tests.antunit.taskdefs/pathconvert-test_xml/testDirsep/
-Jaikiran
Thank you Stefan. I probably didn't look correctly when trying to close
a recent bug that got fixed. I see that the bug is now correctly fixed
for 1.10.15. Thank you.
-Jaikiran
On 08/09/23 12:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-09-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Can someone with admin permissions
Can someone with admin permissions please mark 1.10.14 as a released
version in Ant bugzilla and create a new 1.10.15 release in it? I forgot
to ask for help when I released 1.10.14.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
.14, I have heard one confirmed report that the usage
of this Ant version has helped them build their project on Java 21.
There have been no reports of any usage issues with Java 21 and Ant
1.10.14 so far.
-Jaikiran
On 20/10/23 3:05 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK 21 has b
Hello ewh, no that wasn't intentional and was an oversight. It was
reported recently and has been fixed in the master branch as part of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67417.
-Jaikiran
On 29/09/23 2:46 am, Earl Hood wrote:
Ant Developers,
Was it intended to keep code
With (binding) +1s for Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this
vote has now passed. I'll now go ahead with the rest of the release process.
Thank you all for the help in moving this release forward.
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1
remember that when releasing Ivy 2.5.0, it was
struggle to update the IvyDE update site.
-Jaikiran
On 22/08/23 9:32 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
before I get to the actual content of this mail:
* I'm cross-posting to three lists but I ask you to keep responses to
dev@ant only (and join
en for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
19th August 2023 12 PM.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
the
voting completes (won't create a new RC for that).
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:42 pm, Gary Gregory wrote:
(AFK) Does this remove the class file in the root of the ant-launcher jar which
caused JPMS issues? If so, it might be worth mentioning in the release noyes.
Gary
+1
- Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file
- verified the checksum
- Built some projects using this newer version, on Java 8, 17 and 20
- Checked manual docs for some of the tasks
-Jaikiran
On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1
+1
Downloaded the RC2 of 2.5.2 and built some projects, checked some
manuals and docs and the checksum.
-Jaikiran
On 17/08/23 10:22 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release
- Checked the ivy jar usage with Java 8 and Java 20
- Ran some trivial projects using this new version of Ivy
-Jaikiran
On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.2
Changelog:
- FIX: ivy:retrieve could fail because of a `NullPointerException
site? From what I remember that requires an
Eclipse installation locally, that too a very specific version.
Unfortunately, it's been an extremely long time since I ever used
Eclipse and I don't even have the setup I used many years back when
releasing Ivy.
-Jaikiran
virtual threads preview feature and see how it goes.
-Jaikiran
On 16/05/22 1:13 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to a new Quality Outreach update!
This time, we have one update but a major one: JEP 425 (Virtual
Threads preview) has been integrated into the OpenJDK mainline! JDK 19
Early-Access
which ones to focus on next).
-Jaikiran
On 06/06/22 4:19 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi
right now the Loom prototype doesn't play well with synchronized and the
recommended approach is to use ReentrantLock instead. A quick grep over
Ant's codebase turns up more than 500 hits for synchronized - man
Additionally, I ran the Ant testsuite on a macos setup locally with JDK
19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 by using --enable-preview. No issues were
encountered in the testsuite.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/22 7:11 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello David,
We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26
Hello David,
We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 on a
Linux system. No issues were found in this run
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/26/.
-Jaikiran
On 13/06/22 6:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings!
JDK
and 19 EA (which have changes in the security manager area). The way we
did it isn't the most optimal way (but works). So I just want to find
some time to review that once again before deciding on how we want to go
about it.
-Jaikiran
On 03/06/22 9:40 pm, Simon Law wrote:
Hello!
I
/. Moving to
Apache's JIRA instance _might_ be an option but I don't know what kind
of efforts would be involved and if those are worth it.
-Jaikiran
On 18/08/22 5:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Vladimir
I guess we have to agree that we disagree - and this is fine. Our
perception of how
With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should now be
possible for us to add a new (default) method to the
org.apache.tools.ant.BuildLogger interface to return the current set (or
some default) log level. I will add something along these lines shortly.
-Jaikiran
On 11/10/22 10
Thank you everyone for testing this release and voting on it. With +1s
from Stefan, me and Martijn, this release voting has now passed.
I'll now move ahead with the rest of the release process.
-Jaikiran
On 10/01/23 12:47 am, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
+1
checked diff to of indicated commit
getMessageOutputLevel()
which returns the currently set message output level.
As usual, for asking help or reporting any issues, please continue to
communicate with us on our user mailing list
https://ant.apache.org/mail.html.
-Jaikiran (on be
Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla
access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14
milestone version, for Ant?
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Thank you Stefan. I didn't check before sending this mail :)
-Jaikiran
On 10/01/23 7:16 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-01-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla
access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14
thing.
[1] https://github.com/ibmruntimes/Semeru-Runtimes/issues/15
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
in the
javadoc generation against the Ant project. I've filed
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298525 with the details.
-Jaikiran
On 07/11/22 1:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote:
Greetings,
With JavaOne in Las Vegas, last month was epically busy! It was great
to finally have the ability to meet
h up with
this change and see if there are any additional suggestions or issues
they notice.
-Jaikiran
On 18/11/22 5:07 am, Earl Hood wrote:
Figured give an update wrt our project: The method used by Netbeans project
as cited by Jan appears to work.
I have not done full testing wr
Hello Stefan,
On 18/11/22 2:40 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2022-11-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Users can still use the current released Ant version against these
recent Java versions, but they additionally have to set a system
property while launching Ant to allow setting the security
manager
it in the past and I'll be focusing on this area to see if I can
improve that situation in this coming week before the release.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/53jo1sy8ly2645j68m7s2g2mb4f10dy5
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e
of the "normal" part of
the name. I'll have to think about a way to solve this, but we should
not release Ant with this regression.
Please take your time, I won't rush the release. I'm still experimenting
with the security manager changes.
and close no earlier than
7th January 2023 12 PM.
-Jaikiran (on behalf of Apache Ant team)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1
Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine
Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine
-Jaikiran
On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Happy new year, everyone :)
to you as well
I've created RC1 release
+1
- Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz.
- Installed locally.
- Ran java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version
reported)
- Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed
- Checked some docs in the "doc" folder and they looked fine.
A new method has been introduced on BuildLogger interface called
getMessageOutputLevel() which will return the currently set level. This
will be available in the next Ant release.
-Jaikiran
On 11/10/22 10:38 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should
%20EA%20JDK)/34/
-Jaikiran
On 15/02/23 10:54 am, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!
The first Release Candidates of JDK 20 have been released [1] as per
the schedule [2]. At this stage, only P1 issues will be evaluated. And
with the JDK 20 General
then I'll send out a formal vote mail for the
1.10.14 release, this coming week.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Hello Yuri,
There's a section in
https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.5.1/tutorial/defaultconf.html
called "Setting up the repositories" which explains the use of the
ivy.default.ivy.user.dir property which controls this location.
-Jaikiran
On 07/08/23 1:42 pm, Yuri wrote:
O
601 - 700 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
