Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2?

2010-02-04 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Pushing to the mirrors now. It seems to be on the mirrors by now. Time to update the website?

Re: apr-util - missing file is GPL licensed

2010-02-04 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:11:01 -0500 (EST) Art Cannon kl...@embarqmail.com wrote: Please forgive me if I've reached the wrong list. I apologize. Feel free to point me in the proper direction. I'm curious. There is a GPL licensed file in apr-util. Why is xml/expat/conftools/missing

Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.4.2?

2010-02-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Jeff Trawick schrieb: On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: BTW. while I was on that found that in httpd's roll.sh the gpg signing part looks wrong to me - therefore I kept the

Re: svn commit: r905970 - in /apr/apr/trunk: file_io/unix/filedup.c file_io/unix/open.c file_io/unix/readwrite.c include/apr_file_io.h include/arch/unix/apr_arch_file_io.h

2010-02-04 Thread Paul Querna
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote: On 03.02.2010 20:45, Rüdiger Plüm wrote: On 03.02.2010 11:18, pque...@apache.org wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Wed Feb  3 10:17:57 2010 New Revision: 905970 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=905970view=rev Log:

q about libtool used in apr 1.3.9

2010-02-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9: diff -ru opensource/apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 --- opensource/apr-1.3.9/build/libtool.m4 2009-09-21 17:59:31.0 -0400 +++

Re: apr-util - missing file is GPL licensed

2010-02-04 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Nick Kew | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't | bring you under GPL). It's a shell script. It's hardly linked into expat or apr-util and there's no way it can make the generated binaries

Re: q about libtool used in apr 1.3.9

2010-02-04 Thread Sander Temme
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9: libtool.m4 is copied in when you run libtoolize as called by buildconf. A release tarball has whatever version the

dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Rossi
Hi, I've been playing with the dbd_sqlite3_pvbselect function today and found what I believe to be several major issue. Please note, this issue is probably across all database subsystems. The function looks like, static int dbd_sqlite3_pvbselect(apr_pool_t * pool, apr_dbd_t * sql,

Re: dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:44 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: Is this a design decision or a flaw? Design decision. Just to be clear, you are getting segfaults when you are NOT passing pointers in, correct? If you are doing that, you are misusing the API and causing the segfaults. -- Bojan

Re: dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Rossi
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:51:59AM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:44 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: Is this a design decision or a flaw? Design decision. Just to be clear, you are getting segfaults when you are NOT passing pointers in, correct? Correct. If you are

Re: dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:06 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: If you are bent on preserving this interface, does a new interface make sense, that allows the user to pass in the parameters, without passing in addresses? Nobody is bent on anything, although there were reasons to do it this way (search

Re: dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Rossi
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:09:47AM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:06 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: If you are bent on preserving this interface, does a new interface make sense, that allows the user to pass in the parameters, without passing in addresses? Nobody is bent

Re: dbd p[v]b functions problem

2010-02-04 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:14 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: OK, do you like what I'm suggesting? An interface that takes a va_list, that behaves just like printf... If you like it, what would you like the name of the function to be called? Any pointers? No opinion, to be honest, because I rarely

Re: q about libtool used in apr 1.3.9

2010-02-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote: On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9: libtool.m4 is copied in when you run

Re: apr-util - missing file is GPL licensed

2010-02-04 Thread Nick Kew
On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Nick Kew | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't | bring you under GPL). It's a shell script. It's hardly linked into expat or apr-util

Re: apr-util - missing file is GPL licensed

2010-02-04 Thread Graham Leggett
On 04 Feb 2010, at 6:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote: Since noone else has replied yet, I'll Cc: this to legal. This appears to be part of expat, which APR merely bundles. Your primary port of call should presumably be the expat developers. Having said that, it is indeed included in APR distributions

Re: apr-util - missing file is GPL licensed

2010-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/4/2010 5:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote: On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Nick Kew | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't | bring you under GPL). It's a shell script.

Re: [PATCH] bug in pollset_wakeup() + nocopy

2010-02-04 Thread Neil Conway
Any feedback on this patch? The bug it addresses exists in both 1.4.x and trunk. Neil On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Neil Conway n...@cs.berkeley.edu wrote: Attached is a refreshed version of this patch that applies against current APR trunk (after the recent pollcb_wakeup() changes). The

Re: q about libtool used in apr 1.3.9

2010-02-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 05.02.2010 00:36, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote: On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I have libtool 1.5.26 on Linux (seems to be same version as used for 1.3.9) but I see this difference in my test roll of 1.3.9: